| author | haftmann | 
| Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:21:45 +0100 | |
| changeset 35550 | e2bc7f8d8d51 | 
| parent 27362 | a6dc1769fdda | 
| child 39159 | 0dec18004e75 | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 8177 | 1 | (* Title: HOL/IMPP/Natural.thy | 
| 2 | ID: $Id$ | |
| 3 | Author: David von Oheimb (based on a theory by Tobias Nipkow et al), TUM | |
| 4 | Copyright 1999 TUM | |
| 5 | *) | |
| 6 | ||
| 17477 | 7 | header {* Natural semantics of commands *}
 | 
| 8 | ||
| 9 | theory Natural | |
| 10 | imports Com | |
| 11 | begin | |
| 8177 | 12 | |
| 13 | (** Execution of commands **) | |
| 14 | ||
| 15 | consts | |
| 16 | newlocs :: locals | |
| 17477 | 17 | setlocs :: "state => locals => state" | 
| 18 | getlocs :: "state => locals" | |
| 19 |   update  :: "state => vname => val => state"     ("_/[_/::=/_]" [900,0,0] 900)
 | |
| 27362 | 20 | |
| 21 | abbreviation | |
| 22 |   loc :: "state => locals"  ("_<_>" [75,0] 75) where
 | |
| 23 | "s<X> == getlocs s X" | |
| 8177 | 24 | |
| 23746 | 25 | inductive | 
| 26 |   evalc :: "[com,state,    state] => bool"  ("<_,_>/ -c-> _" [0,0,  51] 51)
 | |
| 27 | where | |
| 17477 | 28 | Skip: "<SKIP,s> -c-> s" | 
| 8177 | 29 | |
| 23746 | 30 | | Assign: "<X :== a,s> -c-> s[X::=a s]" | 
| 8177 | 31 | |
| 23746 | 32 | | Local: "<c, s0[Loc Y::= a s0]> -c-> s1 ==> | 
| 17477 | 33 | <LOCAL Y := a IN c, s0> -c-> s1[Loc Y::=s0<Y>]" | 
| 8177 | 34 | |
| 23746 | 35 | | Semi: "[| <c0,s0> -c-> s1; <c1,s1> -c-> s2 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 36 | <c0;; c1, s0> -c-> s2" | 
| 8177 | 37 | |
| 23746 | 38 | | IfTrue: "[| b s; <c0,s> -c-> s1 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 39 | <IF b THEN c0 ELSE c1, s> -c-> s1" | 
| 8177 | 40 | |
| 23746 | 41 | | IfFalse: "[| ~b s; <c1,s> -c-> s1 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 42 | <IF b THEN c0 ELSE c1, s> -c-> s1" | 
| 8177 | 43 | |
| 23746 | 44 | | WhileFalse: "~b s ==> <WHILE b DO c,s> -c-> s" | 
| 8177 | 45 | |
| 23746 | 46 | | WhileTrue: "[| b s0; <c,s0> -c-> s1; <WHILE b DO c, s1> -c-> s2 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 47 | <WHILE b DO c, s0> -c-> s2" | 
| 8177 | 48 | |
| 23746 | 49 | | Body: "<the (body pn), s0> -c-> s1 ==> | 
| 17477 | 50 | <BODY pn, s0> -c-> s1" | 
| 8177 | 51 | |
| 23746 | 52 | | Call: "<BODY pn, (setlocs s0 newlocs)[Loc Arg::=a s0]> -c-> s1 ==> | 
| 17477 | 53 | <X:=CALL pn(a), s0> -c-> (setlocs s1 (getlocs s0)) | 
| 54 | [X::=s1<Res>]" | |
| 8177 | 55 | |
| 23746 | 56 | inductive | 
| 57 |   evaln :: "[com,state,nat,state] => bool"  ("<_,_>/ -_-> _" [0,0,0,51] 51)
 | |
| 58 | where | |
| 17477 | 59 | Skip: "<SKIP,s> -n-> s" | 
| 60 | ||
| 23746 | 61 | | Assign: "<X :== a,s> -n-> s[X::=a s]" | 
| 8177 | 62 | |
| 23746 | 63 | | Local: "<c, s0[Loc Y::= a s0]> -n-> s1 ==> | 
| 17477 | 64 | <LOCAL Y := a IN c, s0> -n-> s1[Loc Y::=s0<Y>]" | 
| 65 | ||
| 23746 | 66 | | Semi: "[| <c0,s0> -n-> s1; <c1,s1> -n-> s2 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 67 | <c0;; c1, s0> -n-> s2" | 
| 8177 | 68 | |
| 23746 | 69 | | IfTrue: "[| b s; <c0,s> -n-> s1 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 70 | <IF b THEN c0 ELSE c1, s> -n-> s1" | 
| 8177 | 71 | |
| 23746 | 72 | | IfFalse: "[| ~b s; <c1,s> -n-> s1 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 73 | <IF b THEN c0 ELSE c1, s> -n-> s1" | 
| 8177 | 74 | |
| 23746 | 75 | | WhileFalse: "~b s ==> <WHILE b DO c,s> -n-> s" | 
| 17477 | 76 | |
| 23746 | 77 | | WhileTrue: "[| b s0; <c,s0> -n-> s1; <WHILE b DO c, s1> -n-> s2 |] ==> | 
| 17477 | 78 | <WHILE b DO c, s0> -n-> s2" | 
| 8177 | 79 | |
| 23746 | 80 | | Body: "<the (body pn), s0> - n-> s1 ==> | 
| 17477 | 81 | <BODY pn, s0> -Suc n-> s1" | 
| 8177 | 82 | |
| 23746 | 83 | | Call: "<BODY pn, (setlocs s0 newlocs)[Loc Arg::=a s0]> -n-> s1 ==> | 
| 17477 | 84 | <X:=CALL pn(a), s0> -n-> (setlocs s1 (getlocs s0)) | 
| 85 | [X::=s1<Res>]" | |
| 8177 | 86 | |
| 87 | ||
| 17477 | 88 | inductive_cases evalc_elim_cases: | 
| 89 | "<SKIP,s> -c-> t" "<X:==a,s> -c-> t" "<LOCAL Y:=a IN c,s> -c-> t" | |
| 90 | "<c1;;c2,s> -c-> t" "<IF b THEN c1 ELSE c2,s> -c-> t" | |
| 91 | "<BODY P,s> -c-> s1" "<X:=CALL P(a),s> -c-> s1" | |
| 8177 | 92 | |
| 17477 | 93 | inductive_cases evaln_elim_cases: | 
| 94 | "<SKIP,s> -n-> t" "<X:==a,s> -n-> t" "<LOCAL Y:=a IN c,s> -n-> t" | |
| 95 | "<c1;;c2,s> -n-> t" "<IF b THEN c1 ELSE c2,s> -n-> t" | |
| 96 | "<BODY P,s> -n-> s1" "<X:=CALL P(a),s> -n-> s1" | |
| 97 | ||
| 98 | inductive_cases evalc_WHILE_case: "<WHILE b DO c,s> -c-> t" | |
| 99 | inductive_cases evaln_WHILE_case: "<WHILE b DO c,s> -n-> t" | |
| 100 | ||
| 19803 | 101 | declare evalc.intros [intro] | 
| 102 | declare evaln.intros [intro] | |
| 103 | ||
| 104 | declare evalc_elim_cases [elim!] | |
| 105 | declare evaln_elim_cases [elim!] | |
| 106 | ||
| 107 | (* evaluation of com is deterministic *) | |
| 108 | lemma com_det [rule_format (no_asm)]: "<c,s> -c-> t ==> (!u. <c,s> -c-> u --> u=t)" | |
| 109 | apply (erule evalc.induct) | |
| 110 | apply (erule_tac [8] V = "<?c,s1> -c-> s2" in thin_rl) | |
| 24178 
4ff1dc2aa18d
turned Unify flags into configuration options (global only);
 wenzelm parents: 
23746diff
changeset | 111 | (*blast needs unify_search_bound = 40*) | 
| 19803 | 112 | apply (best elim: evalc_WHILE_case)+ | 
| 113 | done | |
| 114 | ||
| 115 | lemma evaln_evalc: "<c,s> -n-> t ==> <c,s> -c-> t" | |
| 116 | apply (erule evaln.induct) | |
| 117 | apply (tactic {* ALLGOALS (resolve_tac (thms "evalc.intros") THEN_ALL_NEW atac) *})
 | |
| 118 | done | |
| 119 | ||
| 120 | lemma Suc_le_D_lemma: "[| Suc n <= m'; (!!m. n <= m ==> P (Suc m)) |] ==> P m'" | |
| 121 | apply (frule Suc_le_D) | |
| 122 | apply blast | |
| 123 | done | |
| 124 | ||
| 125 | lemma evaln_nonstrict [rule_format]: "<c,s> -n-> t ==> !m. n<=m --> <c,s> -m-> t" | |
| 126 | apply (erule evaln.induct) | |
| 127 | apply (tactic {* ALLGOALS (EVERY'[strip_tac,TRY o etac (thm "Suc_le_D_lemma"), REPEAT o smp_tac 1]) *})
 | |
| 128 | apply (tactic {* ALLGOALS (resolve_tac (thms "evaln.intros") THEN_ALL_NEW atac) *})
 | |
| 129 | done | |
| 130 | ||
| 131 | lemma evaln_Suc: "<c,s> -n-> s' ==> <c,s> -Suc n-> s'" | |
| 132 | apply (erule evaln_nonstrict) | |
| 133 | apply auto | |
| 134 | done | |
| 135 | ||
| 136 | lemma evaln_max2: "[| <c1,s1> -n1-> t1; <c2,s2> -n2-> t2 |] ==> | |
| 137 | ? n. <c1,s1> -n -> t1 & <c2,s2> -n -> t2" | |
| 138 | apply (cut_tac m = "n1" and n = "n2" in nat_le_linear) | |
| 139 | apply (blast dest: evaln_nonstrict) | |
| 140 | done | |
| 141 | ||
| 142 | lemma evalc_evaln: "<c,s> -c-> t ==> ? n. <c,s> -n-> t" | |
| 143 | apply (erule evalc.induct) | |
| 144 | apply (tactic {* ALLGOALS (REPEAT o etac exE) *})
 | |
| 145 | apply (tactic {* TRYALL (EVERY'[datac (thm "evaln_max2") 1, REPEAT o eresolve_tac [exE, conjE]]) *})
 | |
| 146 | apply (tactic {* ALLGOALS (rtac exI THEN' resolve_tac (thms "evaln.intros") THEN_ALL_NEW atac) *})
 | |
| 147 | done | |
| 148 | ||
| 149 | lemma eval_eq: "<c,s> -c-> t = (? n. <c,s> -n-> t)" | |
| 150 | apply (fast elim: evalc_evaln evaln_evalc) | |
| 151 | done | |
| 17477 | 152 | |
| 8177 | 153 | end |