author | wenzelm |
Mon, 06 Oct 1997 19:15:22 +0200 | |
changeset 3795 | e687069e7257 |
parent 1461 | 6bcb44e4d6e5 |
child 3837 | d7f033c74b38 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
1461 | 1 |
(* Title: LCF/fix |
660 | 2 |
ID: $Id$ |
1461 | 3 |
Author: Tobias Nipkow |
660 | 4 |
Copyright 1992 University of Cambridge |
5 |
||
6 |
Fixedpoint theory |
|
7 |
*) |
|
8 |
||
0 | 9 |
signature FIX = |
10 |
sig |
|
11 |
val adm_eq: thm |
|
12 |
val adm_not_eq_tr: thm |
|
13 |
val adm_not_not: thm |
|
14 |
val not_eq_TT: thm |
|
15 |
val not_eq_FF: thm |
|
16 |
val not_eq_UU: thm |
|
17 |
val induct2: thm |
|
18 |
val induct_tac: string -> int -> tactic |
|
19 |
val induct2_tac: string*string -> int -> tactic |
|
20 |
end; |
|
21 |
||
22 |
structure Fix:FIX = |
|
23 |
struct |
|
24 |
||
442
13ac1fd0a14d
added parentheses made necessary by change of constrain's precedence
clasohm
parents:
231
diff
changeset
|
25 |
val adm_eq = prove_goal LCF.thy "adm(%x.t(x)=(u(x)::'a::cpo))" |
1461 | 26 |
(fn _ => [rewtac eq_def, |
27 |
REPEAT(rstac[adm_conj,adm_less]1)]); |
|
0 | 28 |
|
29 |
val adm_not_not = prove_goal LCF.thy "adm(P) ==> adm(%x.~~P(x))" |
|
1461 | 30 |
(fn prems => [simp_tac (LCF_ss addsimps prems) 1]); |
0 | 31 |
|
32 |
||
33 |
val tac = rtac tr_induct 1 THEN REPEAT(simp_tac LCF_ss 1); |
|
34 |
||
35 |
val not_eq_TT = prove_goal LCF.thy "ALL p. ~p=TT <-> (p=FF | p=UU)" |
|
660 | 36 |
(fn _ => [tac]) RS spec; |
0 | 37 |
|
38 |
val not_eq_FF = prove_goal LCF.thy "ALL p. ~p=FF <-> (p=TT | p=UU)" |
|
660 | 39 |
(fn _ => [tac]) RS spec; |
0 | 40 |
|
41 |
val not_eq_UU = prove_goal LCF.thy "ALL p. ~p=UU <-> (p=TT | p=FF)" |
|
660 | 42 |
(fn _ => [tac]) RS spec; |
0 | 43 |
|
44 |
val adm_not_eq_tr = prove_goal LCF.thy "ALL p::tr.adm(%x. ~t(x)=p)" |
|
660 | 45 |
(fn _ => [rtac tr_induct 1, |
46 |
REPEAT(simp_tac (LCF_ss addsimps [not_eq_TT,not_eq_FF,not_eq_UU]) 1 THEN |
|
1461 | 47 |
REPEAT(rstac [adm_disj,adm_eq] 1))]) RS spec; |
0 | 48 |
|
49 |
val adm_lemmas = [adm_not_free,adm_eq,adm_less,adm_not_less,adm_not_eq_tr, |
|
1461 | 50 |
adm_conj,adm_disj,adm_imp,adm_all]; |
0 | 51 |
|
52 |
fun induct_tac v i = res_inst_tac[("f",v)] induct i THEN |
|
1461 | 53 |
REPEAT(rstac adm_lemmas i); |
0 | 54 |
|
55 |
||
56 |
val least_FIX = prove_goal LCF.thy "f(p) = p ==> FIX(f) << p" |
|
1461 | 57 |
(fn [prem] => [induct_tac "f" 1, rtac minimal 1, strip_tac 1, |
58 |
stac (prem RS sym) 1, etac less_ap_term 1]); |
|
0 | 59 |
|
60 |
val lfp_is_FIX = prove_goal LCF.thy |
|
1461 | 61 |
"[| f(p) = p; ALL q. f(q)=q --> p << q |] ==> p = FIX(f)" |
62 |
(fn [prem1,prem2] => [rtac less_anti_sym 1, |
|
63 |
rtac (prem2 RS spec RS mp) 1, rtac FIX_eq 1, |
|
64 |
rtac least_FIX 1, rtac prem1 1]); |
|
0 | 65 |
|
66 |
val ffix = read_instantiate [("f","f::?'a=>?'a")] FIX_eq; |
|
67 |
val gfix = read_instantiate [("f","g::?'a=>?'a")] FIX_eq; |
|
68 |
val ss = LCF_ss addsimps [ffix,gfix]; |
|
69 |
||
70 |
val FIX_pair = prove_goal LCF.thy |
|
71 |
"<FIX(f),FIX(g)> = FIX(%p.<f(FST(p)),g(SND(p))>)" |
|
72 |
(fn _ => [rtac lfp_is_FIX 1, simp_tac ss 1, |
|
1461 | 73 |
strip_tac 1, simp_tac (LCF_ss addsimps [PROD_less]) 1, |
74 |
rtac conjI 1, rtac least_FIX 1, etac subst 1, rtac (FST RS sym) 1, |
|
75 |
rtac least_FIX 1, etac subst 1, rtac (SND RS sym) 1]); |
|
0 | 76 |
|
77 |
val FIX_pair_conj = rewrite_rule (map mk_meta_eq [PROD_eq,FST,SND]) FIX_pair; |
|
78 |
||
79 |
val FIX1 = FIX_pair_conj RS conjunct1; |
|
80 |
val FIX2 = FIX_pair_conj RS conjunct2; |
|
81 |
||
82 |
val induct2 = prove_goal LCF.thy |
|
1461 | 83 |
"[| adm(%p.P(FST(p),SND(p))); P(UU::'a,UU::'b);\ |
84 |
\ ALL x y. P(x,y) --> P(f(x),g(y)) |] ==> P(FIX(f),FIX(g))" |
|
85 |
(fn prems => [EVERY1 |
|
86 |
[res_inst_tac [("f","f"),("g","g")] (standard(FIX1 RS ssubst)), |
|
87 |
res_inst_tac [("f","f"),("g","g")] (standard(FIX2 RS ssubst)), |
|
88 |
res_inst_tac [("f","%x. <f(FST(x)),g(SND(x))>")] induct, |
|
89 |
rstac prems, simp_tac ss, rstac prems, |
|
90 |
simp_tac (LCF_ss addsimps [expand_all_PROD]), rstac prems]]); |
|
0 | 91 |
|
92 |
fun induct2_tac (f,g) i = res_inst_tac[("f",f),("g",g)] induct2 i THEN |
|
1461 | 93 |
REPEAT(rstac adm_lemmas i); |
0 | 94 |
|
95 |
end; |
|
96 |
||
97 |
open Fix; |