| author | wenzelm | 
| Wed, 02 May 2012 22:37:50 +0200 | |
| changeset 47863 | ec5d54029664 | 
| parent 47397 | d654c73e4b12 | 
| child 55414 | eab03e9cee8a | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 46238 
9ace9e5b79be
renaming theory AList_Impl back to AList (reverting 1fec5b365f9b; AList with distinct key invariant is called DAList)
 bulwahn parents: 
46171diff
changeset | 1 | (* Title: HOL/Library/AList.thy | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 2 | Author: Norbert Schirmer, Tobias Nipkow, Martin Wildmoser, TU Muenchen | 
| 19234 | 3 | *) | 
| 4 | ||
| 44897 
787983a08bfb
moving connection of association lists to Mappings into a separate theory
 bulwahn parents: 
39921diff
changeset | 5 | header {* Implementation of Association Lists *}
 | 
| 19234 | 6 | |
| 46238 
9ace9e5b79be
renaming theory AList_Impl back to AList (reverting 1fec5b365f9b; AList with distinct key invariant is called DAList)
 bulwahn parents: 
46171diff
changeset | 7 | theory AList | 
| 45990 
b7b905b23b2a
incorporated More_Set and More_List into the Main body -- to be consolidated later
 haftmann parents: 
45884diff
changeset | 8 | imports Main | 
| 19234 | 9 | begin | 
| 10 | ||
| 22740 | 11 | text {*
 | 
| 12 | The operations preserve distinctness of keys and | |
| 13 |   function @{term "clearjunk"} distributes over them. Since 
 | |
| 14 |   @{term clearjunk} enforces distinctness of keys it can be used
 | |
| 15 | to establish the invariant, e.g. for inductive proofs. | |
| 16 | *} | |
| 19234 | 17 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 18 | subsection {* @{text update} and @{text updates} *}
 | 
| 19323 | 19 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 20 | primrec update :: "'key \<Rightarrow> 'val \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 22740 | 21 | "update k v [] = [(k, v)]" | 
| 22 | | "update k v (p#ps) = (if fst p = k then (k, v) # ps else p # update k v ps)" | |
| 19234 | 23 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 24 | lemma update_conv': "map_of (update k v al) = (map_of al)(k\<mapsto>v)" | 
| 39302 
d7728f65b353
renamed lemmas: ext_iff -> fun_eq_iff, set_ext_iff -> set_eq_iff, set_ext -> set_eqI
 nipkow parents: 
39198diff
changeset | 25 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff) | 
| 23373 | 26 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 27 | corollary update_conv: "map_of (update k v al) k' = ((map_of al)(k\<mapsto>v)) k'" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 28 | by (simp add: update_conv') | 
| 19234 | 29 | |
| 30 | lemma dom_update: "fst ` set (update k v al) = {k} \<union> fst ` set al"
 | |
| 31 | by (induct al) auto | |
| 32 | ||
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 33 | lemma update_keys: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 34 | "map fst (update k v al) = | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 35 | (if k \<in> set (map fst al) then map fst al else map fst al @ [k])" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 36 | by (induct al) simp_all | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 37 | |
| 19234 | 38 | lemma distinct_update: | 
| 39 | assumes "distinct (map fst al)" | |
| 40 | shows "distinct (map fst (update k v al))" | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 41 | using assms by (simp add: update_keys) | 
| 19234 | 42 | |
| 43 | lemma update_filter: | |
| 23281 | 44 | "a\<noteq>k \<Longrightarrow> update k v [q\<leftarrow>ps . fst q \<noteq> a] = [q\<leftarrow>update k v ps . fst q \<noteq> a]" | 
| 19234 | 45 | by (induct ps) auto | 
| 46 | ||
| 47 | lemma update_triv: "map_of al k = Some v \<Longrightarrow> update k v al = al" | |
| 48 | by (induct al) auto | |
| 49 | ||
| 50 | lemma update_nonempty [simp]: "update k v al \<noteq> []" | |
| 51 | by (induct al) auto | |
| 52 | ||
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 53 | lemma update_eqD: "update k v al = update k v' al' \<Longrightarrow> v = v'" | 
| 20503 | 54 | proof (induct al arbitrary: al') | 
| 19234 | 55 | case Nil thus ?case | 
| 56 | by (cases al') (auto split: split_if_asm) | |
| 57 | next | |
| 58 | case Cons thus ?case | |
| 59 | by (cases al') (auto split: split_if_asm) | |
| 60 | qed | |
| 61 | ||
| 62 | lemma update_last [simp]: "update k v (update k v' al) = update k v al" | |
| 63 | by (induct al) auto | |
| 64 | ||
| 65 | text {* Note that the lists are not necessarily the same:
 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 66 |         @{term "update k v (update k' v' []) = [(k', v'), (k, v)]"} and 
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 67 |         @{term "update k' v' (update k v []) = [(k, v), (k', v')]"}.*}
 | 
| 19234 | 68 | lemma update_swap: "k\<noteq>k' | 
| 69 | \<Longrightarrow> map_of (update k v (update k' v' al)) = map_of (update k' v' (update k v al))" | |
| 39302 
d7728f65b353
renamed lemmas: ext_iff -> fun_eq_iff, set_ext_iff -> set_eq_iff, set_ext -> set_eqI
 nipkow parents: 
39198diff
changeset | 70 | by (simp add: update_conv' fun_eq_iff) | 
| 19234 | 71 | |
| 72 | lemma update_Some_unfold: | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 73 | "map_of (update k v al) x = Some y \<longleftrightarrow> | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 74 | x = k \<and> v = y \<or> x \<noteq> k \<and> map_of al x = Some y" | 
| 19234 | 75 | by (simp add: update_conv' map_upd_Some_unfold) | 
| 76 | ||
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 77 | lemma image_update [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 78 | "x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> map_of (update x y al) ` A = map_of al ` A" | 
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 79 | by (simp add: update_conv') | 
| 19234 | 80 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 81 | definition updates :: "'key list \<Rightarrow> 'val list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 82 | "updates ks vs = fold (prod_case update) (zip ks vs)" | 
| 19234 | 83 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 84 | lemma updates_simps [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 85 | "updates [] vs ps = ps" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 86 | "updates ks [] ps = ps" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 87 | "updates (k#ks) (v#vs) ps = updates ks vs (update k v ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 88 | by (simp_all add: updates_def) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 89 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 90 | lemma updates_key_simp [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 91 | "updates (k # ks) vs ps = | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 92 | (case vs of [] \<Rightarrow> ps | v # vs \<Rightarrow> updates ks vs (update k v ps))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 93 | by (cases vs) simp_all | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 94 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 95 | lemma updates_conv': "map_of (updates ks vs al) = (map_of al)(ks[\<mapsto>]vs)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 96 | proof - | 
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 97 | have "map_of \<circ> fold (prod_case update) (zip ks vs) = | 
| 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 98 | fold (\<lambda>(k, v) f. f(k \<mapsto> v)) (zip ks vs) \<circ> map_of" | 
| 39921 | 99 | by (rule fold_commute) (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff update_conv') | 
| 47397 
d654c73e4b12
no preference wrt. fold(l/r); prefer fold rather than foldr for iterating over lists in generated code
 haftmann parents: 
46507diff
changeset | 100 | then show ?thesis by (auto simp add: updates_def fun_eq_iff map_upds_fold_map_upd foldl_conv_fold split_def) | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 101 | qed | 
| 19234 | 102 | |
| 103 | lemma updates_conv: "map_of (updates ks vs al) k = ((map_of al)(ks[\<mapsto>]vs)) k" | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 104 | by (simp add: updates_conv') | 
| 19234 | 105 | |
| 106 | lemma distinct_updates: | |
| 107 | assumes "distinct (map fst al)" | |
| 108 | shows "distinct (map fst (updates ks vs al))" | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 109 | proof - | 
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 110 | have "distinct (fold | 
| 37458 | 111 | (\<lambda>(k, v) al. if k \<in> set al then al else al @ [k]) | 
| 112 | (zip ks vs) (map fst al))" | |
| 113 | by (rule fold_invariant [of "zip ks vs" "\<lambda>_. True"]) (auto intro: assms) | |
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 114 | moreover have "map fst \<circ> fold (prod_case update) (zip ks vs) = | 
| 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 115 | fold (\<lambda>(k, v) al. if k \<in> set al then al else al @ [k]) (zip ks vs) \<circ> map fst" | 
| 39921 | 116 | by (rule fold_commute) (simp add: update_keys split_def prod_case_beta comp_def) | 
| 39302 
d7728f65b353
renamed lemmas: ext_iff -> fun_eq_iff, set_ext_iff -> set_eq_iff, set_ext -> set_eqI
 nipkow parents: 
39198diff
changeset | 117 | ultimately show ?thesis by (simp add: updates_def fun_eq_iff) | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 118 | qed | 
| 19234 | 119 | |
| 120 | lemma updates_append1[simp]: "size ks < size vs \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 121 | updates (ks@[k]) vs al = update k (vs!size ks) (updates ks vs al)" | |
| 20503 | 122 | by (induct ks arbitrary: vs al) (auto split: list.splits) | 
| 19234 | 123 | |
| 124 | lemma updates_list_update_drop[simp]: | |
| 125 | "\<lbrakk>size ks \<le> i; i < size vs\<rbrakk> | |
| 126 | \<Longrightarrow> updates ks (vs[i:=v]) al = updates ks vs al" | |
| 20503 | 127 | by (induct ks arbitrary: al vs i) (auto split:list.splits nat.splits) | 
| 19234 | 128 | |
| 129 | lemma update_updates_conv_if: " | |
| 130 | map_of (updates xs ys (update x y al)) = | |
| 131 | map_of (if x \<in> set(take (length ys) xs) then updates xs ys al | |
| 132 | else (update x y (updates xs ys al)))" | |
| 133 | by (simp add: updates_conv' update_conv' map_upd_upds_conv_if) | |
| 134 | ||
| 135 | lemma updates_twist [simp]: | |
| 136 | "k \<notin> set ks \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 137 | map_of (updates ks vs (update k v al)) = map_of (update k v (updates ks vs al))" | |
| 46507 | 138 | by (simp add: updates_conv' update_conv') | 
| 19234 | 139 | |
| 140 | lemma updates_apply_notin[simp]: | |
| 141 | "k \<notin> set ks ==> map_of (updates ks vs al) k = map_of al k" | |
| 142 | by (simp add: updates_conv) | |
| 143 | ||
| 144 | lemma updates_append_drop[simp]: | |
| 145 | "size xs = size ys \<Longrightarrow> updates (xs@zs) ys al = updates xs ys al" | |
| 20503 | 146 | by (induct xs arbitrary: ys al) (auto split: list.splits) | 
| 19234 | 147 | |
| 148 | lemma updates_append2_drop[simp]: | |
| 149 | "size xs = size ys \<Longrightarrow> updates xs (ys@zs) al = updates xs ys al" | |
| 20503 | 150 | by (induct xs arbitrary: ys al) (auto split: list.splits) | 
| 19234 | 151 | |
| 23373 | 152 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 153 | subsection {* @{text delete} *}
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 154 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 155 | definition delete :: "'key \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 156 | delete_eq: "delete k = filter (\<lambda>(k', _). k \<noteq> k')" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 157 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 158 | lemma delete_simps [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 159 | "delete k [] = []" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 160 | "delete k (p#ps) = (if fst p = k then delete k ps else p # delete k ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 161 | by (auto simp add: delete_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 162 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 163 | lemma delete_conv': "map_of (delete k al) = (map_of al)(k := None)" | 
| 39302 
d7728f65b353
renamed lemmas: ext_iff -> fun_eq_iff, set_ext_iff -> set_eq_iff, set_ext -> set_eqI
 nipkow parents: 
39198diff
changeset | 164 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff) | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 165 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 166 | corollary delete_conv: "map_of (delete k al) k' = ((map_of al)(k := None)) k'" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 167 | by (simp add: delete_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 168 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 169 | lemma delete_keys: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 170 | "map fst (delete k al) = removeAll k (map fst al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 171 | by (simp add: delete_eq removeAll_filter_not_eq filter_map split_def comp_def) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 172 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 173 | lemma distinct_delete: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 174 | assumes "distinct (map fst al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 175 | shows "distinct (map fst (delete k al))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 176 | using assms by (simp add: delete_keys distinct_removeAll) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 177 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 178 | lemma delete_id [simp]: "k \<notin> fst ` set al \<Longrightarrow> delete k al = al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 179 | by (auto simp add: image_iff delete_eq filter_id_conv) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 180 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 181 | lemma delete_idem: "delete k (delete k al) = delete k al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 182 | by (simp add: delete_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 183 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 184 | lemma map_of_delete [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 185 | "k' \<noteq> k \<Longrightarrow> map_of (delete k al) k' = map_of al k'" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 186 | by (simp add: delete_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 187 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 188 | lemma delete_notin_dom: "k \<notin> fst ` set (delete k al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 189 | by (auto simp add: delete_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 190 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 191 | lemma dom_delete_subset: "fst ` set (delete k al) \<subseteq> fst ` set al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 192 | by (auto simp add: delete_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 193 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 194 | lemma delete_update_same: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 195 | "delete k (update k v al) = delete k al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 196 | by (induct al) simp_all | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 197 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 198 | lemma delete_update: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 199 | "k \<noteq> l \<Longrightarrow> delete l (update k v al) = update k v (delete l al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 200 | by (induct al) simp_all | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 201 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 202 | lemma delete_twist: "delete x (delete y al) = delete y (delete x al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 203 | by (simp add: delete_eq conj_commute) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 204 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 205 | lemma length_delete_le: "length (delete k al) \<le> length al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 206 | by (simp add: delete_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 207 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 208 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 209 | subsection {* @{text restrict} *}
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 210 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 211 | definition restrict :: "'key set \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 212 | restrict_eq: "restrict A = filter (\<lambda>(k, v). k \<in> A)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 213 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 214 | lemma restr_simps [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 215 | "restrict A [] = []" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 216 | "restrict A (p#ps) = (if fst p \<in> A then p # restrict A ps else restrict A ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 217 | by (auto simp add: restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 218 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 219 | lemma restr_conv': "map_of (restrict A al) = ((map_of al)|` A)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 220 | proof | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 221 | fix k | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 222 | show "map_of (restrict A al) k = ((map_of al)|` A) k" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 223 | by (induct al) (simp, cases "k \<in> A", auto) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 224 | qed | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 225 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 226 | corollary restr_conv: "map_of (restrict A al) k = ((map_of al)|` A) k" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 227 | by (simp add: restr_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 228 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 229 | lemma distinct_restr: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 230 | "distinct (map fst al) \<Longrightarrow> distinct (map fst (restrict A al))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 231 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 232 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 233 | lemma restr_empty [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 234 |   "restrict {} al = []" 
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 235 | "restrict A [] = []" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 236 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 237 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 238 | lemma restr_in [simp]: "x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> map_of (restrict A al) x = map_of al x" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 239 | by (simp add: restr_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 240 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 241 | lemma restr_out [simp]: "x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> map_of (restrict A al) x = None" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 242 | by (simp add: restr_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 243 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 244 | lemma dom_restr [simp]: "fst ` set (restrict A al) = fst ` set al \<inter> A" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 245 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 246 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 247 | lemma restr_upd_same [simp]: "restrict (-{x}) (update x y al) = restrict (-{x}) al"
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 248 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 249 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 250 | lemma restr_restr [simp]: "restrict A (restrict B al) = restrict (A\<inter>B) al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 251 | by (induct al) (auto simp add: restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 252 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 253 | lemma restr_update[simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 254 | "map_of (restrict D (update x y al)) = | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 255 |   map_of ((if x \<in> D then (update x y (restrict (D-{x}) al)) else restrict D al))"
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 256 | by (simp add: restr_conv' update_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 257 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 258 | lemma restr_delete [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 259 | "(delete x (restrict D al)) = | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 260 |     (if x \<in> D then restrict (D - {x}) al else restrict D al)"
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 261 | apply (simp add: delete_eq restrict_eq) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 262 | apply (auto simp add: split_def) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 263 | proof - | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 264 | have "\<And>y. y \<noteq> x \<longleftrightarrow> x \<noteq> y" by auto | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 265 | then show "[p \<leftarrow> al. fst p \<in> D \<and> x \<noteq> fst p] = [p \<leftarrow> al. fst p \<in> D \<and> fst p \<noteq> x]" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 266 | by simp | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 267 | assume "x \<notin> D" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 268 | then have "\<And>y. y \<in> D \<longleftrightarrow> y \<in> D \<and> x \<noteq> y" by auto | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 269 | then show "[p \<leftarrow> al . fst p \<in> D \<and> x \<noteq> fst p] = [p \<leftarrow> al . fst p \<in> D]" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 270 | by simp | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 271 | qed | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 272 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 273 | lemma update_restr: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 274 |  "map_of (update x y (restrict D al)) = map_of (update x y (restrict (D-{x}) al))"
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 275 | by (simp add: update_conv' restr_conv') (rule fun_upd_restrict) | 
| 19234 | 276 | |
| 45867 | 277 | lemma update_restr_conv [simp]: | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 278 | "x \<in> D \<Longrightarrow> | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 279 |  map_of (update x y (restrict D al)) = map_of (update x y (restrict (D-{x}) al))"
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 280 | by (simp add: update_conv' restr_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 281 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 282 | lemma restr_updates [simp]: " | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 283 | \<lbrakk> length xs = length ys; set xs \<subseteq> D \<rbrakk> | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 284 | \<Longrightarrow> map_of (restrict D (updates xs ys al)) = | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 285 | map_of (updates xs ys (restrict (D - set xs) al))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 286 | by (simp add: updates_conv' restr_conv') | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 287 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 288 | lemma restr_delete_twist: "(restrict A (delete a ps)) = delete a (restrict A ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 289 | by (induct ps) auto | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 290 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 291 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 292 | subsection {* @{text clearjunk} *}
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 293 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 294 | function clearjunk  :: "('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 295 | "clearjunk [] = []" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 296 | | "clearjunk (p#ps) = p # clearjunk (delete (fst p) ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 297 | by pat_completeness auto | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 298 | termination by (relation "measure length") | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 299 | (simp_all add: less_Suc_eq_le length_delete_le) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 300 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 301 | lemma map_of_clearjunk: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 302 | "map_of (clearjunk al) = map_of al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 303 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) | 
| 39302 
d7728f65b353
renamed lemmas: ext_iff -> fun_eq_iff, set_ext_iff -> set_eq_iff, set_ext -> set_eqI
 nipkow parents: 
39198diff
changeset | 304 | (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff) | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 305 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 306 | lemma clearjunk_keys_set: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 307 | "set (map fst (clearjunk al)) = set (map fst al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 308 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 309 | (simp_all add: delete_keys) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 310 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 311 | lemma dom_clearjunk: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 312 | "fst ` set (clearjunk al) = fst ` set al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 313 | using clearjunk_keys_set by simp | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 314 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 315 | lemma distinct_clearjunk [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 316 | "distinct (map fst (clearjunk al))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 317 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 318 | (simp_all del: set_map add: clearjunk_keys_set delete_keys) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 319 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 320 | lemma ran_clearjunk: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 321 | "ran (map_of (clearjunk al)) = ran (map_of al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 322 | by (simp add: map_of_clearjunk) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 323 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 324 | lemma ran_map_of: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 325 | "ran (map_of al) = snd ` set (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 326 | proof - | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 327 | have "ran (map_of al) = ran (map_of (clearjunk al))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 328 | by (simp add: ran_clearjunk) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 329 | also have "\<dots> = snd ` set (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 330 | by (simp add: ran_distinct) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 331 | finally show ?thesis . | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 332 | qed | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 333 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 334 | lemma clearjunk_update: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 335 | "clearjunk (update k v al) = update k v (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 336 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 337 | (simp_all add: delete_update) | 
| 19234 | 338 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 339 | lemma clearjunk_updates: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 340 | "clearjunk (updates ks vs al) = updates ks vs (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 341 | proof - | 
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 342 | have "clearjunk \<circ> fold (prod_case update) (zip ks vs) = | 
| 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 343 | fold (prod_case update) (zip ks vs) \<circ> clearjunk" | 
| 39921 | 344 | by (rule fold_commute) (simp add: clearjunk_update prod_case_beta o_def) | 
| 39302 
d7728f65b353
renamed lemmas: ext_iff -> fun_eq_iff, set_ext_iff -> set_eq_iff, set_ext -> set_eqI
 nipkow parents: 
39198diff
changeset | 345 | then show ?thesis by (simp add: updates_def fun_eq_iff) | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 346 | qed | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 347 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 348 | lemma clearjunk_delete: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 349 | "clearjunk (delete x al) = delete x (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 350 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) (auto simp add: delete_idem delete_twist) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 351 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 352 | lemma clearjunk_restrict: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 353 | "clearjunk (restrict A al) = restrict A (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 354 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) (auto simp add: restr_delete_twist) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 355 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 356 | lemma distinct_clearjunk_id [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 357 | "distinct (map fst al) \<Longrightarrow> clearjunk al = al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 358 | by (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct) auto | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 359 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 360 | lemma clearjunk_idem: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 361 | "clearjunk (clearjunk al) = clearjunk al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 362 | by simp | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 363 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 364 | lemma length_clearjunk: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 365 | "length (clearjunk al) \<le> length al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 366 | proof (induct al rule: clearjunk.induct [case_names Nil Cons]) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 367 | case Nil then show ?case by simp | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 368 | next | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 369 | case (Cons kv al) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 370 | moreover have "length (delete (fst kv) al) \<le> length al" by (fact length_delete_le) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 371 | ultimately have "length (clearjunk (delete (fst kv) al)) \<le> length al" by (rule order_trans) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 372 | then show ?case by simp | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 373 | qed | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 374 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 375 | lemma delete_map: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 376 | assumes "\<And>kv. fst (f kv) = fst kv" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 377 | shows "delete k (map f ps) = map f (delete k ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 378 | by (simp add: delete_eq filter_map comp_def split_def assms) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 379 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 380 | lemma clearjunk_map: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 381 | assumes "\<And>kv. fst (f kv) = fst kv" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 382 | shows "clearjunk (map f ps) = map f (clearjunk ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 383 | by (induct ps rule: clearjunk.induct [case_names Nil Cons]) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 384 | (simp_all add: clearjunk_delete delete_map assms) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 385 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 386 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 387 | subsection {* @{text map_ran} *}
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 388 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 389 | definition map_ran :: "('key \<Rightarrow> 'val \<Rightarrow> 'val) \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 390 | "map_ran f = map (\<lambda>(k, v). (k, f k v))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 391 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 392 | lemma map_ran_simps [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 393 | "map_ran f [] = []" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 394 | "map_ran f ((k, v) # ps) = (k, f k v) # map_ran f ps" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 395 | by (simp_all add: map_ran_def) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 396 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 397 | lemma dom_map_ran: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 398 | "fst ` set (map_ran f al) = fst ` set al" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 399 | by (simp add: map_ran_def image_image split_def) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 400 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 401 | lemma map_ran_conv: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 402 | "map_of (map_ran f al) k = Option.map (f k) (map_of al k)" | 
| 19234 | 403 | by (induct al) auto | 
| 404 | ||
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 405 | lemma distinct_map_ran: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 406 | "distinct (map fst al) \<Longrightarrow> distinct (map fst (map_ran f al))" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 407 | by (simp add: map_ran_def split_def comp_def) | 
| 19234 | 408 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 409 | lemma map_ran_filter: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 410 | "map_ran f [p\<leftarrow>ps. fst p \<noteq> a] = [p\<leftarrow>map_ran f ps. fst p \<noteq> a]" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 411 | by (simp add: map_ran_def filter_map split_def comp_def) | 
| 19234 | 412 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 413 | lemma clearjunk_map_ran: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 414 | "clearjunk (map_ran f al) = map_ran f (clearjunk al)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 415 | by (simp add: map_ran_def split_def clearjunk_map) | 
| 19234 | 416 | |
| 23373 | 417 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 418 | subsection {* @{text merge} *}
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 419 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 420 | definition merge :: "('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list" where
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 421 | "merge qs ps = foldr (\<lambda>(k, v). update k v) ps qs" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 422 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 423 | lemma merge_simps [simp]: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 424 | "merge qs [] = qs" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 425 | "merge qs (p#ps) = update (fst p) (snd p) (merge qs ps)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 426 | by (simp_all add: merge_def split_def) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 427 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 428 | lemma merge_updates: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 429 | "merge qs ps = updates (rev (map fst ps)) (rev (map snd ps)) qs" | 
| 47397 
d654c73e4b12
no preference wrt. fold(l/r); prefer fold rather than foldr for iterating over lists in generated code
 haftmann parents: 
46507diff
changeset | 430 | by (simp add: merge_def updates_def foldr_conv_fold zip_rev zip_map_fst_snd) | 
| 19234 | 431 | |
| 432 | lemma dom_merge: "fst ` set (merge xs ys) = fst ` set xs \<union> fst ` set ys" | |
| 20503 | 433 | by (induct ys arbitrary: xs) (auto simp add: dom_update) | 
| 19234 | 434 | |
| 435 | lemma distinct_merge: | |
| 436 | assumes "distinct (map fst xs)" | |
| 437 | shows "distinct (map fst (merge xs ys))" | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 438 | using assms by (simp add: merge_updates distinct_updates) | 
| 19234 | 439 | |
| 440 | lemma clearjunk_merge: | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 441 | "clearjunk (merge xs ys) = merge (clearjunk xs) ys" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 442 | by (simp add: merge_updates clearjunk_updates) | 
| 19234 | 443 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 444 | lemma merge_conv': | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 445 | "map_of (merge xs ys) = map_of xs ++ map_of ys" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 446 | proof - | 
| 46133 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 447 | have "map_of \<circ> fold (prod_case update) (rev ys) = | 
| 
d9fe85d3d2cd
incorporated canonical fold combinator on lists into body of List theory; refactored passages on List.fold(l/r)
 haftmann parents: 
45990diff
changeset | 448 | fold (\<lambda>(k, v) m. m(k \<mapsto> v)) (rev ys) \<circ> map_of" | 
| 39921 | 449 | by (rule fold_commute) (simp add: update_conv' prod_case_beta split_def fun_eq_iff) | 
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 450 | then show ?thesis | 
| 47397 
d654c73e4b12
no preference wrt. fold(l/r); prefer fold rather than foldr for iterating over lists in generated code
 haftmann parents: 
46507diff
changeset | 451 | by (simp add: merge_def map_add_map_of_foldr foldr_conv_fold fun_eq_iff) | 
| 19234 | 452 | qed | 
| 453 | ||
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 454 | corollary merge_conv: | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 455 | "map_of (merge xs ys) k = (map_of xs ++ map_of ys) k" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 456 | by (simp add: merge_conv') | 
| 19234 | 457 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 458 | lemma merge_empty: "map_of (merge [] ys) = map_of ys" | 
| 19234 | 459 | by (simp add: merge_conv') | 
| 460 | ||
| 461 | lemma merge_assoc[simp]: "map_of (merge m1 (merge m2 m3)) = | |
| 462 | map_of (merge (merge m1 m2) m3)" | |
| 463 | by (simp add: merge_conv') | |
| 464 | ||
| 465 | lemma merge_Some_iff: | |
| 466 | "(map_of (merge m n) k = Some x) = | |
| 467 | (map_of n k = Some x \<or> map_of n k = None \<and> map_of m k = Some x)" | |
| 468 | by (simp add: merge_conv' map_add_Some_iff) | |
| 469 | ||
| 45605 | 470 | lemmas merge_SomeD [dest!] = merge_Some_iff [THEN iffD1] | 
| 19234 | 471 | |
| 472 | lemma merge_find_right[simp]: "map_of n k = Some v \<Longrightarrow> map_of (merge m n) k = Some v" | |
| 473 | by (simp add: merge_conv') | |
| 474 | ||
| 475 | lemma merge_None [iff]: | |
| 476 | "(map_of (merge m n) k = None) = (map_of n k = None \<and> map_of m k = None)" | |
| 477 | by (simp add: merge_conv') | |
| 478 | ||
| 479 | lemma merge_upd[simp]: | |
| 480 | "map_of (merge m (update k v n)) = map_of (update k v (merge m n))" | |
| 481 | by (simp add: update_conv' merge_conv') | |
| 482 | ||
| 483 | lemma merge_updatess[simp]: | |
| 484 | "map_of (merge m (updates xs ys n)) = map_of (updates xs ys (merge m n))" | |
| 485 | by (simp add: updates_conv' merge_conv') | |
| 486 | ||
| 487 | lemma merge_append: "map_of (xs@ys) = map_of (merge ys xs)" | |
| 488 | by (simp add: merge_conv') | |
| 489 | ||
| 23373 | 490 | |
| 34975 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 491 | subsection {* @{text compose} *}
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 492 | |
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 493 | function compose :: "('key \<times> 'a) list \<Rightarrow> ('a \<times> 'b) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'b) list" where
 | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 494 | "compose [] ys = []" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 495 | | "compose (x#xs) ys = (case map_of ys (snd x) | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 496 | of None \<Rightarrow> compose (delete (fst x) xs) ys | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 497 | | Some v \<Rightarrow> (fst x, v) # compose xs ys)" | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 498 | by pat_completeness auto | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 499 | termination by (relation "measure (length \<circ> fst)") | 
| 
f099b0b20646
more correspondence lemmas between related operations; tuned some proofs
 haftmann parents: 
32960diff
changeset | 500 | (simp_all add: less_Suc_eq_le length_delete_le) | 
| 19234 | 501 | |
| 502 | lemma compose_first_None [simp]: | |
| 503 | assumes "map_of xs k = None" | |
| 504 | shows "map_of (compose xs ys) k = None" | |
| 23373 | 505 | using assms by (induct xs ys rule: compose.induct) | 
| 22916 | 506 | (auto split: option.splits split_if_asm) | 
| 19234 | 507 | |
| 508 | lemma compose_conv: | |
| 509 | shows "map_of (compose xs ys) k = (map_of ys \<circ>\<^sub>m map_of xs) k" | |
| 22916 | 510 | proof (induct xs ys rule: compose.induct) | 
| 511 | case 1 then show ?case by simp | |
| 19234 | 512 | next | 
| 22916 | 513 | case (2 x xs ys) show ?case | 
| 19234 | 514 | proof (cases "map_of ys (snd x)") | 
| 22916 | 515 | case None with 2 | 
| 19234 | 516 | have hyp: "map_of (compose (delete (fst x) xs) ys) k = | 
| 517 | (map_of ys \<circ>\<^sub>m map_of (delete (fst x) xs)) k" | |
| 518 | by simp | |
| 519 | show ?thesis | |
| 520 | proof (cases "fst x = k") | |
| 521 | case True | |
| 522 | from True delete_notin_dom [of k xs] | |
| 523 | have "map_of (delete (fst x) xs) k = None" | |
| 32960 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 524 | by (simp add: map_of_eq_None_iff) | 
| 19234 | 525 | with hyp show ?thesis | 
| 32960 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 526 | using True None | 
| 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 527 | by simp | 
| 19234 | 528 | next | 
| 529 | case False | |
| 530 | from False have "map_of (delete (fst x) xs) k = map_of xs k" | |
| 32960 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 531 | by simp | 
| 19234 | 532 | with hyp show ?thesis | 
| 32960 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 533 | using False None | 
| 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 534 | by (simp add: map_comp_def) | 
| 19234 | 535 | qed | 
| 536 | next | |
| 537 | case (Some v) | |
| 22916 | 538 | with 2 | 
| 19234 | 539 | have "map_of (compose xs ys) k = (map_of ys \<circ>\<^sub>m map_of xs) k" | 
| 540 | by simp | |
| 541 | with Some show ?thesis | |
| 542 | by (auto simp add: map_comp_def) | |
| 543 | qed | |
| 544 | qed | |
| 545 | ||
| 546 | lemma compose_conv': | |
| 547 | shows "map_of (compose xs ys) = (map_of ys \<circ>\<^sub>m map_of xs)" | |
| 548 | by (rule ext) (rule compose_conv) | |
| 549 | ||
| 550 | lemma compose_first_Some [simp]: | |
| 551 | assumes "map_of xs k = Some v" | |
| 552 | shows "map_of (compose xs ys) k = map_of ys v" | |
| 23373 | 553 | using assms by (simp add: compose_conv) | 
| 19234 | 554 | |
| 555 | lemma dom_compose: "fst ` set (compose xs ys) \<subseteq> fst ` set xs" | |
| 22916 | 556 | proof (induct xs ys rule: compose.induct) | 
| 557 | case 1 thus ?case by simp | |
| 19234 | 558 | next | 
| 22916 | 559 | case (2 x xs ys) | 
| 19234 | 560 | show ?case | 
| 561 | proof (cases "map_of ys (snd x)") | |
| 562 | case None | |
| 22916 | 563 | with "2.hyps" | 
| 19234 | 564 | have "fst ` set (compose (delete (fst x) xs) ys) \<subseteq> fst ` set (delete (fst x) xs)" | 
| 565 | by simp | |
| 566 | also | |
| 567 | have "\<dots> \<subseteq> fst ` set xs" | |
| 568 | by (rule dom_delete_subset) | |
| 569 | finally show ?thesis | |
| 570 | using None | |
| 571 | by auto | |
| 572 | next | |
| 573 | case (Some v) | |
| 22916 | 574 | with "2.hyps" | 
| 19234 | 575 | have "fst ` set (compose xs ys) \<subseteq> fst ` set xs" | 
| 576 | by simp | |
| 577 | with Some show ?thesis | |
| 578 | by auto | |
| 579 | qed | |
| 580 | qed | |
| 581 | ||
| 582 | lemma distinct_compose: | |
| 583 | assumes "distinct (map fst xs)" | |
| 584 | shows "distinct (map fst (compose xs ys))" | |
| 23373 | 585 | using assms | 
| 22916 | 586 | proof (induct xs ys rule: compose.induct) | 
| 587 | case 1 thus ?case by simp | |
| 19234 | 588 | next | 
| 22916 | 589 | case (2 x xs ys) | 
| 19234 | 590 | show ?case | 
| 591 | proof (cases "map_of ys (snd x)") | |
| 592 | case None | |
| 22916 | 593 | with 2 show ?thesis by simp | 
| 19234 | 594 | next | 
| 595 | case (Some v) | |
| 22916 | 596 | with 2 dom_compose [of xs ys] show ?thesis | 
| 19234 | 597 | by (auto) | 
| 598 | qed | |
| 599 | qed | |
| 600 | ||
| 601 | lemma compose_delete_twist: "(compose (delete k xs) ys) = delete k (compose xs ys)" | |
| 22916 | 602 | proof (induct xs ys rule: compose.induct) | 
| 603 | case 1 thus ?case by simp | |
| 19234 | 604 | next | 
| 22916 | 605 | case (2 x xs ys) | 
| 19234 | 606 | show ?case | 
| 607 | proof (cases "map_of ys (snd x)") | |
| 608 | case None | |
| 22916 | 609 | with 2 have | 
| 19234 | 610 | hyp: "compose (delete k (delete (fst x) xs)) ys = | 
| 611 | delete k (compose (delete (fst x) xs) ys)" | |
| 612 | by simp | |
| 613 | show ?thesis | |
| 614 | proof (cases "fst x = k") | |
| 615 | case True | |
| 616 | with None hyp | |
| 617 | show ?thesis | |
| 32960 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 618 | by (simp add: delete_idem) | 
| 19234 | 619 | next | 
| 620 | case False | |
| 621 | from None False hyp | |
| 622 | show ?thesis | |
| 32960 
69916a850301
eliminated hard tabulators, guessing at each author's individual tab-width;
 wenzelm parents: 
30663diff
changeset | 623 | by (simp add: delete_twist) | 
| 19234 | 624 | qed | 
| 625 | next | |
| 626 | case (Some v) | |
| 22916 | 627 | with 2 have hyp: "compose (delete k xs) ys = delete k (compose xs ys)" by simp | 
| 19234 | 628 | with Some show ?thesis | 
| 629 | by simp | |
| 630 | qed | |
| 631 | qed | |
| 632 | ||
| 633 | lemma compose_clearjunk: "compose xs (clearjunk ys) = compose xs ys" | |
| 22916 | 634 | by (induct xs ys rule: compose.induct) | 
| 19234 | 635 | (auto simp add: map_of_clearjunk split: option.splits) | 
| 636 | ||
| 637 | lemma clearjunk_compose: "clearjunk (compose xs ys) = compose (clearjunk xs) ys" | |
| 638 | by (induct xs rule: clearjunk.induct) | |
| 639 | (auto split: option.splits simp add: clearjunk_delete delete_idem | |
| 640 | compose_delete_twist) | |
| 641 | ||
| 642 | lemma compose_empty [simp]: | |
| 643 | "compose xs [] = []" | |
| 22916 | 644 | by (induct xs) (auto simp add: compose_delete_twist) | 
| 19234 | 645 | |
| 646 | lemma compose_Some_iff: | |
| 647 | "(map_of (compose xs ys) k = Some v) = | |
| 648 | (\<exists>k'. map_of xs k = Some k' \<and> map_of ys k' = Some v)" | |
| 649 | by (simp add: compose_conv map_comp_Some_iff) | |
| 650 | ||
| 651 | lemma map_comp_None_iff: | |
| 652 | "(map_of (compose xs ys) k = None) = | |
| 653 | (map_of xs k = None \<or> (\<exists>k'. map_of xs k = Some k' \<and> map_of ys k' = None)) " | |
| 654 | by (simp add: compose_conv map_comp_None_iff) | |
| 655 | ||
| 45869 | 656 | subsection {* @{text map_entry} *}
 | 
| 657 | ||
| 658 | fun map_entry :: "'key \<Rightarrow> ('val \<Rightarrow> 'val) \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list"
 | |
| 659 | where | |
| 660 | "map_entry k f [] = []" | |
| 661 | | "map_entry k f (p # ps) = (if fst p = k then (k, f (snd p)) # ps else p # map_entry k f ps)" | |
| 662 | ||
| 663 | lemma map_of_map_entry: | |
| 664 | "map_of (map_entry k f xs) = (map_of xs)(k := case map_of xs k of None => None | Some v' => Some (f v'))" | |
| 665 | by (induct xs) auto | |
| 666 | ||
| 667 | lemma dom_map_entry: | |
| 668 | "fst ` set (map_entry k f xs) = fst ` set xs" | |
| 669 | by (induct xs) auto | |
| 670 | ||
| 671 | lemma distinct_map_entry: | |
| 672 | assumes "distinct (map fst xs)" | |
| 673 | shows "distinct (map fst (map_entry k f xs))" | |
| 674 | using assms by (induct xs) (auto simp add: dom_map_entry) | |
| 675 | ||
| 45868 | 676 | subsection {* @{text map_default} *}
 | 
| 677 | ||
| 678 | fun map_default :: "'key \<Rightarrow> 'val \<Rightarrow> ('val \<Rightarrow> 'val) \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list \<Rightarrow> ('key \<times> 'val) list"
 | |
| 679 | where | |
| 680 | "map_default k v f [] = [(k, v)]" | |
| 681 | | "map_default k v f (p # ps) = (if fst p = k then (k, f (snd p)) # ps else p # map_default k v f ps)" | |
| 682 | ||
| 683 | lemma map_of_map_default: | |
| 684 | "map_of (map_default k v f xs) = (map_of xs)(k := case map_of xs k of None => Some v | Some v' => Some (f v'))" | |
| 685 | by (induct xs) auto | |
| 686 | ||
| 687 | lemma dom_map_default: | |
| 688 | "fst ` set (map_default k v f xs) = insert k (fst ` set xs)" | |
| 689 | by (induct xs) auto | |
| 690 | ||
| 691 | lemma distinct_map_default: | |
| 692 | assumes "distinct (map fst xs)" | |
| 693 | shows "distinct (map fst (map_default k v f xs))" | |
| 694 | using assms by (induct xs) (auto simp add: dom_map_default) | |
| 695 | ||
| 46171 
19f68d7671f0
proper hiding of facts and constants in AList_Impl and AList theory
 bulwahn parents: 
46133diff
changeset | 696 | hide_const (open) update updates delete restrict clearjunk merge compose map_entry | 
| 45884 | 697 | |
| 19234 | 698 | end |