equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
246 |
246 |
247 lemma not_essential_cong: |
247 lemma not_essential_cong: |
248 assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = g x) (at z)" "z = z'" |
248 assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = g x) (at z)" "z = z'" |
249 shows "not_essential f z \<longleftrightarrow> not_essential g z'" |
249 shows "not_essential f z \<longleftrightarrow> not_essential g z'" |
250 unfolding not_essential_def using assms filterlim_cong is_pole_cong by fastforce |
250 unfolding not_essential_def using assms filterlim_cong is_pole_cong by fastforce |
|
251 |
|
252 lemma not_essential_compose_iff: |
|
253 assumes "filtermap g (at z) = at z'" |
|
254 shows "not_essential (f \<circ> g) z = not_essential f z'" |
|
255 unfolding not_essential_def filterlim_def filtermap_compose assms is_pole_compose_iff[OF assms] |
|
256 by blast |
251 |
257 |
252 lemma isolated_singularity_at_cong: |
258 lemma isolated_singularity_at_cong: |
253 assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = g x) (at z)" "z = z'" |
259 assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = g x) (at z)" "z = z'" |
254 shows "isolated_singularity_at f z \<longleftrightarrow> isolated_singularity_at g z'" |
260 shows "isolated_singularity_at f z \<longleftrightarrow> isolated_singularity_at g z'" |
255 proof - |
261 proof - |
360 using \<open>n>m\<close> |
366 using \<open>n>m\<close> |
361 by (auto simp add: Lim_ident_at intro!:tendsto_powr_complex_0 tendsto_eq_intros) |
367 by (auto simp add: Lim_ident_at intro!:tendsto_powr_complex_0 tendsto_eq_intros) |
362 ultimately have "(f' \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F" unfolding F_def |
368 ultimately have "(f' \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F" unfolding F_def |
363 by (simp add: continuous_within) |
369 by (simp add: continuous_within) |
364 moreover have "(g \<longlongrightarrow> g z) F" |
370 moreover have "(g \<longlongrightarrow> g z) F" |
365 using holomorphic_on_imp_continuous_on[OF g_holo,unfolded continuous_on_def] \<open>r>0\<close> |
371 unfolding F_def |
366 unfolding F_def by auto |
372 using \<open>r>0\<close> centre_in_ball continuous_on_def g_holo holomorphic_on_imp_continuous_on by blast |
367 ultimately show " ((\<lambda>w. f' w * g w) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F" using tendsto_mult by fastforce |
373 ultimately show " ((\<lambda>w. f' w * g w) \<longlongrightarrow> 0) F" using tendsto_mult by fastforce |
368 qed |
374 qed |
369 moreover have "(h \<longlongrightarrow> h z) (at z within ball z r)" |
375 moreover have "(h \<longlongrightarrow> h z) (at z within ball z r)" |
370 using holomorphic_on_imp_continuous_on[OF h_holo] |
376 using holomorphic_on_imp_continuous_on[OF h_holo] |
371 by (auto simp add:continuous_on_def \<open>r>0\<close>) |
377 by (auto simp add:continuous_on_def \<open>r>0\<close>) |
1056 |
1062 |
1057 lemma analytic_at_imp_no_pole: "f analytic_on {z} \<Longrightarrow> \<not>is_pole f z" |
1063 lemma analytic_at_imp_no_pole: "f analytic_on {z} \<Longrightarrow> \<not>is_pole f z" |
1058 using analytic_at not_is_pole_holomorphic by blast |
1064 using analytic_at not_is_pole_holomorphic by blast |
1059 |
1065 |
1060 lemma not_essential_const [singularity_intros]: "not_essential (\<lambda>_. c) z" |
1066 lemma not_essential_const [singularity_intros]: "not_essential (\<lambda>_. c) z" |
1061 unfolding not_essential_def by (rule exI[of _ c]) auto |
1067 by blast |
1062 |
1068 |
1063 lemma not_essential_uminus [singularity_intros]: |
1069 lemma not_essential_uminus [singularity_intros]: |
1064 assumes f_ness: "not_essential f z" |
1070 assumes f_ness: "not_essential f z" |
1065 assumes f_iso:"isolated_singularity_at f z" |
1071 assumes f_iso:"isolated_singularity_at f z" |
1066 shows "not_essential (\<lambda>w. -f w) z" |
1072 shows "not_essential (\<lambda>w. -f w) z" |