--- a/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_proof.ML Tue Nov 06 11:20:56 2012 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_proof.ML Tue Nov 06 11:20:56 2012 +0100
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
signature ATP_PROOF =
sig
type ('a, 'b) ho_term = ('a, 'b) ATP_Problem.ho_term
+ type formula_role = ATP_Problem.formula_role
type ('a, 'b, 'c, 'd) formula = ('a, 'b, 'c, 'd) ATP_Problem.formula
type 'a problem = 'a ATP_Problem.problem
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@
datatype 'a step =
Definition_Step of step_name * 'a * 'a |
- Inference_Step of step_name * 'a * string * step_name list
+ Inference_Step of step_name * formula_role * 'a * string * step_name list
type 'a proof = ('a, 'a, ('a, 'a) ho_term, 'a) formula step list
@@ -213,12 +214,12 @@
datatype 'a step =
Definition_Step of step_name * 'a * 'a |
- Inference_Step of step_name * 'a * string * step_name list
+ Inference_Step of step_name * formula_role * 'a * string * step_name list
type 'a proof = ('a, 'a, ('a, 'a) ho_term, 'a) formula step list
fun step_name (Definition_Step (name, _, _)) = name
- | step_name (Inference_Step (name, _, _, _)) = name
+ | step_name (Inference_Step (name, _, _, _, _)) = name
(**** PARSING OF TSTP FORMAT ****)
@@ -374,6 +375,15 @@
fun commute_eq (AAtom (ATerm ((s, []), tms))) = AAtom (ATerm ((s, []), rev tms))
| commute_eq _ = raise Fail "expected equation"
+fun role_of_tptp_string "axiom" = Axiom
+ | role_of_tptp_string "definition" = Definition
+ | role_of_tptp_string "lemma" = Lemma
+ | role_of_tptp_string "hypothesis" = Hypothesis
+ | role_of_tptp_string "conjecture" = Conjecture
+ | role_of_tptp_string "negated_conjecture" = Negated_Conjecture
+ | role_of_tptp_string "plain" = Plain
+ | role_of_tptp_string _ = Unknown
+
(* Syntax: (cnf|fof|tff|thf)\(<num>, <formula_role>,
<formula> <extra_arguments>\).
The <num> could be an identifier, but we assume integers. *)
@@ -407,16 +417,18 @@
phi), "", [])
| Inference_Source (rule, deps) => (((num, []), phi), rule, deps)
fun mk_step () =
- Inference_Step (name, phi, rule, map (rpair []) deps)
+ Inference_Step (name, role_of_tptp_string role, phi, rule,
+ map (rpair []) deps)
in
- case role of
- "definition" =>
+ case role_of_tptp_string role of
+ Definition =>
(case phi of
AConn (AIff, [phi1 as AAtom _, phi2]) =>
Definition_Step (name, phi1, phi2)
| AAtom (ATerm (("equal", []), _)) =>
(* Vampire's equality proxy axiom *)
- Inference_Step (name, phi, rule, map (rpair []) deps)
+ Inference_Step (name, Definition, phi, rule,
+ map (rpair []) deps)
| _ => mk_step ())
| _ => mk_step ()
end)
@@ -462,7 +474,8 @@
-- Scan.option (Scan.this_string "derived from formulae "
|-- Scan.repeat (scan_general_id --| Scan.option ($$ " ")))
>> (fn ((((num, rule), deps), u), names) =>
- Inference_Step ((num, these names), u, rule, map (rpair []) deps))) x
+ Inference_Step ((num, these names), Unknown, u, rule,
+ map (rpair []) deps))) x
val satallax_coreN = "__satallax_core" (* arbitrary *)
val z3_tptp_coreN = "__z3_tptp_core" (* arbitrary *)
@@ -471,12 +484,14 @@
fun parse_z3_tptp_line x =
(scan_general_id --| $$ "," --| $$ "[" -- parse_dependencies --| $$ "]"
>> (fn (name, names) =>
- Inference_Step (("", name :: names), dummy_phi, z3_tptp_coreN, []))) x
+ Inference_Step (("", name :: names), Unknown, dummy_phi,
+ z3_tptp_coreN, []))) x
(* Syntax: <name> *)
fun parse_satallax_line x =
(scan_general_id --| Scan.option ($$ " ")
- >> (fn s => Inference_Step ((s, [s]), dummy_phi, satallax_coreN, []))) x
+ >> (fn s => Inference_Step ((s, [s]), Unknown, dummy_phi, satallax_coreN,
+ []))) x
fun parse_line problem =
parse_tstp_line problem || parse_spass_line || parse_z3_tptp_line
@@ -499,8 +514,9 @@
| clean_up_dependencies seen
((step as Definition_Step (name, _, _)) :: steps) =
step :: clean_up_dependencies (name :: seen) steps
- | clean_up_dependencies seen (Inference_Step (name, u, rule, deps) :: steps) =
- Inference_Step (name, u, rule,
+ | clean_up_dependencies seen
+ (Inference_Step (name, role, u, rule, deps) :: steps) =
+ Inference_Step (name, role, u, rule,
map_filter (fn dep => find_first (is_same_atp_step dep) seen) deps) ::
clean_up_dependencies (name :: seen) steps
@@ -516,8 +532,8 @@
fun map_term_names_in_step f (Definition_Step (name, phi1, phi2)) =
Definition_Step (name, map_term_names_in_formula f phi1,
map_term_names_in_formula f phi2)
- | map_term_names_in_step f (Inference_Step (name, phi, rule, deps)) =
- Inference_Step (name, map_term_names_in_formula f phi, rule, deps)
+ | map_term_names_in_step f (Inference_Step (name, role, phi, rule, deps)) =
+ Inference_Step (name, role, map_term_names_in_formula f phi, rule, deps)
fun map_term_names_in_atp_proof f = map (map_term_names_in_step f)
fun nasty_name pool s = s |> Symtab.lookup pool |> the_default s