src/HOL/Hyperreal/Taylor.thy
changeset 28952 15a4b2cf8c34
parent 28948 1860f016886d
child 28953 48cd567f6940
--- a/src/HOL/Hyperreal/Taylor.thy	Wed Dec 03 09:53:58 2008 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,134 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      HOL/Hyperreal/Taylor.thy
-    ID:         $Id$
-    Author:     Lukas Bulwahn, Bernhard Haeupler, Technische Universitaet Muenchen
-*)
-
-header {* Taylor series *}
-
-theory Taylor
-imports MacLaurin
-begin
-
-text {*
-We use MacLaurin and the translation of the expansion point @{text c} to @{text 0}
-to prove Taylor's theorem.
-*}
-
-lemma taylor_up: 
-  assumes INIT: "n>0" "diff 0 = f"
-  and DERIV: "(\<forall> m t. m < n & a \<le> t & t \<le> b \<longrightarrow> DERIV (diff m) t :> (diff (Suc m) t))"
-  and INTERV: "a \<le> c" "c < b" 
-  shows "\<exists> t. c < t & t < b & 
-    f b = setsum (%m. (diff m c / real (fact m)) * (b - c)^m) {0..<n} +
-      (diff n t / real (fact n)) * (b - c)^n"
-proof -
-  from INTERV have "0 < b-c" by arith
-  moreover 
-  from INIT have "n>0" "((\<lambda>m x. diff m (x + c)) 0) = (\<lambda>x. f (x + c))" by auto
-  moreover
-  have "ALL m t. m < n & 0 <= t & t <= b - c --> DERIV (%x. diff m (x + c)) t :> diff (Suc m) (t + c)"
-  proof (intro strip)
-    fix m t
-    assume "m < n & 0 <= t & t <= b - c"
-    with DERIV and INTERV have "DERIV (diff m) (t + c) :> diff (Suc m) (t + c)" by auto
-    moreover
-    from DERIV_ident and DERIV_const have "DERIV (%x. x + c) t :> 1+0" by (rule DERIV_add)
-    ultimately have "DERIV (%x. diff m (x + c)) t :> diff (Suc m) (t + c) * (1+0)"
-      by (rule DERIV_chain2)
-    thus "DERIV (%x. diff m (x + c)) t :> diff (Suc m) (t + c)" by simp
-  qed
-  ultimately 
-  have EX:"EX t>0. t < b - c & 
-    f (b - c + c) = (SUM m = 0..<n. diff m (0 + c) / real (fact m) * (b - c) ^ m) +
-      diff n (t + c) / real (fact n) * (b - c) ^ n" 
-    by (rule Maclaurin)
-  show ?thesis
-  proof -
-    from EX obtain x where 
-      X: "0 < x & x < b - c & 
-        f (b - c + c) = (\<Sum>m = 0..<n. diff m (0 + c) / real (fact m) * (b - c) ^ m) +
-          diff n (x + c) / real (fact n) * (b - c) ^ n" ..
-    let ?H = "x + c"
-    from X have "c<?H & ?H<b \<and> f b = (\<Sum>m = 0..<n. diff m c / real (fact m) * (b - c) ^ m) +
-      diff n ?H / real (fact n) * (b - c) ^ n"
-      by fastsimp
-    thus ?thesis by fastsimp
-  qed
-qed
-
-lemma taylor_down:
-  assumes INIT: "n>0" "diff 0 = f"
-  and DERIV: "(\<forall> m t. m < n & a \<le> t & t \<le> b \<longrightarrow> DERIV (diff m) t :> (diff (Suc m) t))"
-  and INTERV: "a < c" "c \<le> b"
-  shows "\<exists> t. a < t & t < c & 
-    f a = setsum (% m. (diff m c / real (fact m)) * (a - c)^m) {0..<n} +
-      (diff n t / real (fact n)) * (a - c)^n" 
-proof -
-  from INTERV have "a-c < 0" by arith
-  moreover 
-  from INIT have "n>0" "((\<lambda>m x. diff m (x + c)) 0) = (\<lambda>x. f (x + c))" by auto
-  moreover
-  have "ALL m t. m < n & a-c <= t & t <= 0 --> DERIV (%x. diff m (x + c)) t :> diff (Suc m) (t + c)"
-  proof (rule allI impI)+
-    fix m t
-    assume "m < n & a-c <= t & t <= 0"
-    with DERIV and INTERV have "DERIV (diff m) (t + c) :> diff (Suc m) (t + c)" by auto 
-    moreover
-    from DERIV_ident and DERIV_const have "DERIV (%x. x + c) t :> 1+0" by (rule DERIV_add)
-    ultimately have "DERIV (%x. diff m (x + c)) t :> diff (Suc m) (t + c) * (1+0)" by (rule DERIV_chain2)
-    thus "DERIV (%x. diff m (x + c)) t :> diff (Suc m) (t + c)" by simp
-  qed
-  ultimately 
-  have EX: "EX t>a - c. t < 0 &
-    f (a - c + c) = (SUM m = 0..<n. diff m (0 + c) / real (fact m) * (a - c) ^ m) +
-      diff n (t + c) / real (fact n) * (a - c) ^ n" 
-    by (rule Maclaurin_minus)
-  show ?thesis
-  proof -
-    from EX obtain x where X: "a - c < x & x < 0 &
-      f (a - c + c) = (SUM m = 0..<n. diff m (0 + c) / real (fact m) * (a - c) ^ m) +
-        diff n (x + c) / real (fact n) * (a - c) ^ n" ..
-    let ?H = "x + c"
-    from X have "a<?H & ?H<c \<and> f a = (\<Sum>m = 0..<n. diff m c / real (fact m) * (a - c) ^ m) +
-      diff n ?H / real (fact n) * (a - c) ^ n"
-      by fastsimp
-    thus ?thesis by fastsimp
-  qed
-qed
-
-lemma taylor:
-  assumes INIT: "n>0" "diff 0 = f"
-  and DERIV: "(\<forall> m t. m < n & a \<le> t & t \<le> b \<longrightarrow> DERIV (diff m) t :> (diff (Suc m) t))"
-  and INTERV: "a \<le> c " "c \<le> b" "a \<le> x" "x \<le> b" "x \<noteq> c" 
-  shows "\<exists> t. (if x<c then (x < t & t < c) else (c < t & t < x)) &
-    f x = setsum (% m. (diff m c / real (fact m)) * (x - c)^m) {0..<n} +
-      (diff n t / real (fact n)) * (x - c)^n" 
-proof (cases "x<c")
-  case True
-  note INIT
-  moreover from DERIV and INTERV
-  have "\<forall>m t. m < n \<and> x \<le> t \<and> t \<le> b \<longrightarrow> DERIV (diff m) t :> diff (Suc m) t"
-    by fastsimp
-  moreover note True
-  moreover from INTERV have "c \<le> b" by simp
-  ultimately have EX: "\<exists>t>x. t < c \<and> f x =
-    (\<Sum>m = 0..<n. diff m c / real (fact m) * (x - c) ^ m) +
-      diff n t / real (fact n) * (x - c) ^ n"
-    by (rule taylor_down)
-  with True show ?thesis by simp
-next
-  case False
-  note INIT
-  moreover from DERIV and INTERV
-  have "\<forall>m t. m < n \<and> a \<le> t \<and> t \<le> x \<longrightarrow> DERIV (diff m) t :> diff (Suc m) t"
-    by fastsimp
-  moreover from INTERV have "a \<le> c" by arith
-  moreover from False and INTERV have "c < x" by arith
-  ultimately have EX: "\<exists>t>c. t < x \<and> f x =
-    (\<Sum>m = 0..<n. diff m c / real (fact m) * (x - c) ^ m) +
-      diff n t / real (fact n) * (x - c) ^ n" 
-    by (rule taylor_up)
-  with False show ?thesis by simp
-qed
-
-end