--- a/src/ZF/AC/AC15_WO6.ML Wed Jan 16 15:04:37 2002 +0100
+++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,292 +0,0 @@
-(* Title: ZF/AC/AC15_WO6.ML
- ID: $Id$
- Author: Krzysztof Grabczewski
-
-The proofs needed to state that AC10, ..., AC15 are equivalent to the rest.
-We need the following:
-
-WO1 ==> AC10(n) ==> AC11 ==> AC12 ==> AC15 ==> WO6
-
-In order to add the formulations AC13 and AC14 we need:
-
-AC10(succ(n)) ==> AC13(n) ==> AC14 ==> AC15
-
-or
-
-AC1 ==> AC13(1); AC13(m) ==> AC13(n) ==> AC14 ==> AC15 (m le n)
-
-So we don't have to prove all implications of both cases.
-Moreover we don't need to prove AC13(1) ==> AC1 and AC11 ==> AC14 as
-Rubin & Rubin do.
-*)
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* Lemmas used in the proofs in which the conclusion is AC13, AC14 *)
-(* or AC15 *)
-(* - cons_times_nat_not_Finite *)
-(* - ex_fun_AC13_AC15 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw [lepoll_def] "A\\<noteq>0 ==> B lepoll A*B";
-by (etac not_emptyE 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [("x","\\<lambda>z \\<in> B. <x,z>")] exI 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSIs [snd_conv, lam_injective]) 1);
-qed "lepoll_Sigma";
-
-Goal "0\\<notin>A ==> \\<forall>B \\<in> {cons(0,x*nat). x \\<in> A}. ~Finite(B)";
-by (rtac ballI 1);
-by (etac RepFunE 1);
-by (hyp_subst_tac 1);
-by (rtac notI 1);
-by (dresolve_tac [subset_consI RS subset_imp_lepoll RS lepoll_Finite] 1);
-by (resolve_tac [lepoll_Sigma RS lepoll_Finite RS (nat_not_Finite RS notE)] 1
- THEN (assume_tac 2));
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "cons_times_nat_not_Finite";
-
-Goal "[| Union(C)=A; a \\<in> A |] ==> \\<exists>B \\<in> C. a \\<in> B & B \\<subseteq> A";
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-val lemma1 = result();
-
-Goalw [pairwise_disjoint_def]
- "[| pairwise_disjoint(A); B \\<in> A; C \\<in> A; a \\<in> B; a \\<in> C |] ==> B=C";
-by (dtac IntI 1 THEN (assume_tac 1));
-by (dres_inst_tac [("A","B Int C")] not_emptyI 1);
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-val lemma2 = result();
-
-Goalw [sets_of_size_between_def]
- "\\<forall>B \\<in> {cons(0, x*nat). x \\<in> A}. pairwise_disjoint(f`B) & \
-\ sets_of_size_between(f`B, 2, n) & Union(f`B)=B \
-\ ==> \\<forall>B \\<in> A. \\<exists>! u. u \\<in> f`cons(0, B*nat) & u \\<subseteq> cons(0, B*nat) & \
-\ 0 \\<in> u & 2 lepoll u & u lepoll n";
-by (rtac ballI 1);
-by (etac ballE 1);
-by (Fast_tac 2);
-by (REPEAT (etac conjE 1));
-by (dresolve_tac [consI1 RSN (2, lemma1)] 1);
-by (etac bexE 1);
-by (rtac ex1I 1);
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-by (REPEAT (etac conjE 1));
-by (rtac lemma2 1 THEN (REPEAT (assume_tac 1)));
-val lemma3 = result();
-
-Goalw [lepoll_def] "[| A lepoll i; Ord(i) |] ==> {P(a). a \\<in> A} lepoll i";
-by (etac exE 1);
-by (res_inst_tac
- [("x", "\\<lambda>x \\<in> RepFun(A, P). LEAST j. \\<exists>a \\<in> A. x=P(a) & f`a=j")] exI 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [("d", "%y. P(converse(f)`y)")] lam_injective 1);
-by (etac RepFunE 1);
-by (forward_tac [inj_is_fun RS apply_type] 1 THEN (assume_tac 1));
-by (fast_tac (claset() addIs [LeastI2]
- addSEs [Ord_in_Ord, inj_is_fun RS apply_type]) 1);
-by (etac RepFunE 1);
-by (rtac LeastI2 1);
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSEs [Ord_in_Ord, inj_is_fun RS apply_type]) 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addEs [sym, left_inverse RS ssubst]) 1);
-val lemma4 = result();
-
-Goal "[| n \\<in> nat; B \\<in> A; u(B) \\<subseteq> cons(0, B*nat); 0 \\<in> u(B); 2 lepoll u(B); \
-\ u(B) lepoll succ(n) |] \
-\ ==> (\\<lambda>x \\<in> A. {fst(x). x \\<in> u(x)-{0}})`B \\<noteq> 0 & \
-\ (\\<lambda>x \\<in> A. {fst(x). x \\<in> u(x)-{0}})`B \\<subseteq> B & \
-\ (\\<lambda>x \\<in> A. {fst(x). x \\<in> u(x)-{0}})`B lepoll n";
-by (Asm_simp_tac 1);
-by (rtac conjI 1);
-by (fast_tac (empty_cs addSDs [RepFun_eq_0_iff RS iffD1]
- addDs [lepoll_Diff_sing]
- addEs [lepoll_trans RS succ_lepoll_natE, ssubst]
- addSIs [notI, lepoll_refl, nat_0I]) 1);
-by (rtac conjI 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSIs [fst_type] addSEs [consE]) 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSEs [equalityE,
- Diff_lepoll RS (nat_into_Ord RSN (2, lemma4))]) 1);
-val lemma5 = result();
-
-Goal "[| \\<exists>f. \\<forall>B \\<in> {cons(0, x*nat). x \\<in> A}. \
-\ pairwise_disjoint(f`B) & \
-\ sets_of_size_between(f`B, 2, succ(n)) & \
-\ Union(f`B)=B; n \\<in> nat |] \
-\ ==> \\<exists>f. \\<forall>B \\<in> A. f`B \\<noteq> 0 & f`B \\<subseteq> B & f`B lepoll n";
-by (fast_tac (empty_cs addSDs [lemma3, theI] addDs [bspec]
- addSEs [exE, conjE]
- addIs [exI, ballI, lemma5]) 1);
-qed "ex_fun_AC13_AC15";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* The target proofs *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC10(n) ==> AC11 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "[| n \\<in> nat; 1 le n; AC10(n) |] ==> AC11";
-by (rtac bexI 1 THEN (assume_tac 2));
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "AC10_AC11";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC11 ==> AC12 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "AC11 ==> AC12";
-by (fast_tac (FOL_cs addSEs [bexE] addIs [bexI]) 1);
-qed "AC11_AC12";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC12 ==> AC15 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "AC12 ==> AC15";
-by Safe_tac;
-by (etac allE 1);
-by (etac impE 1);
-by (etac cons_times_nat_not_Finite 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSIs [ex_fun_AC13_AC15]) 1);
-qed "AC12_AC15";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC15 ==> WO6 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goal "Ord(x) ==> (\\<Union>a<x. F(a)) = (\\<Union>a \\<in> x. F(a))";
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSIs [ltI] addSDs [ltD]) 1);
-qed "OUN_eq_UN";
-
-val [prem] = goal thy "\\<forall>x \\<in> Pow(A)-{0}. f`x\\<noteq>0 & f`x \\<subseteq> x & f`x lepoll m ==> \
-\ (\\<Union>i<LEAST x. HH(f,A,x)={A}. HH(f,A,i)) = A";
-by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Ord_Least RS OUN_eq_UN]) 1);
-by (rtac equalityI 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSDs [less_Least_subset_x]) 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSDs [prem RS bspec]
- addSIs [f_subsets_imp_UN_HH_eq_x RS (Diff_eq_0_iff RS iffD1)]) 1);
-val lemma1 = result();
-
-val [prem] = goal thy "\\<forall>x \\<in> Pow(A)-{0}. f`x\\<noteq>0 & f`x \\<subseteq> x & f`x lepoll m ==> \
-\ \\<forall>x<LEAST x. HH(f,A,x)={A}. HH(f,A,x) lepoll m";
-by (rtac oallI 1);
-by (dresolve_tac [ltD RS less_Least_subset_x] 1);
-by (ftac HH_subset_imp_eq 1);
-by (etac ssubst 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addIs [prem RS ballE]
- addSDs [HH_subset_x_imp_subset_Diff_UN RS not_emptyI2]) 1);
-val lemma2 = result();
-
-Goalw [AC15_def, WO6_def] "AC15 ==> WO6";
-by (rtac allI 1);
-by (eres_inst_tac [("x","Pow(A)-{0}")] allE 1);
-by (etac impE 1);
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-by (REPEAT (eresolve_tac [bexE,conjE,exE] 1));
-by (rtac bexI 1 THEN (assume_tac 2));
-by (rtac conjI 1 THEN (assume_tac 1));
-by (res_inst_tac [("x","LEAST i. HH(f,A,i)={A}")] exI 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [("x","\\<lambda>j \\<in> (LEAST i. HH(f,A,i)={A}). HH(f,A,j)")] exI 1);
-by (Asm_full_simp_tac 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSIs [Ord_Least, lam_type RS domain_of_fun]
- addSEs [less_Least_subset_x, lemma1, lemma2]) 1);
-qed "AC15_WO6";
-
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* The proof needed in the first case, not in the second *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC10(n) ==> AC13(n-1) if 2 le n *)
-(* *)
-(* Because of the change to the formal definition of AC10(n) we prove *)
-(* the following obviously equivalent theorem \\<in> *)
-(* AC10(n) implies AC13(n) for (1 le n) *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "[| n \\<in> nat; 1 le n; AC10(n) |] ==> AC13(n)";
-by Safe_tac;
-by (fast_tac (empty_cs addSEs [allE, cons_times_nat_not_Finite RSN (2, impE),
- ex_fun_AC13_AC15]) 1);
-qed "AC10_AC13";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* The proofs needed in the second case, not in the first *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC1 ==> AC13(1) *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "AC1 ==> AC13(1)";
-by (rtac allI 1);
-by (etac allE 1);
-by (rtac impI 1);
-by (mp_tac 1);
-by (etac exE 1);
-by (res_inst_tac [("x","\\<lambda>x \\<in> A. {f`x}")] exI 1);
-by (asm_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps
- [singleton_eqpoll_1 RS eqpoll_imp_lepoll,
- singletonI RS not_emptyI]) 1);
-qed "AC1_AC13";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC13(m) ==> AC13(n) for m \\<subseteq> n *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "[| m le n; AC13(m) |] ==> AC13(n)";
-by (dtac le_imp_lepoll 1);
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSEs [lepoll_trans]) 1);
-qed "AC13_mono";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* The proofs necessary for both cases *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC13(n) ==> AC14 if 1 \\<subseteq> n *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "[| n \\<in> nat; 1 le n; AC13(n) |] ==> AC14";
-by (fast_tac (FOL_cs addIs [bexI]) 1);
-qed "AC13_AC14";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC14 ==> AC15 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw AC_defs "AC14 ==> AC15";
-by (Fast_tac 1);
-qed "AC14_AC15";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* The redundant proofs; however cited by Rubin & Rubin *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC13(1) ==> AC1 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goal "[| A\\<noteq>0; A lepoll 1 |] ==> \\<exists>a. A={a}";
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSEs [not_emptyE, lepoll_1_is_sing]) 1);
-qed "lemma_aux";
-
-Goal "\\<forall>B \\<in> A. f(B)\\<noteq>0 & f(B)<=B & f(B) lepoll 1 \
-\ ==> (\\<lambda>x \\<in> A. THE y. f(x)={y}) \\<in> (\\<Pi>X \\<in> A. X)";
-by (rtac lam_type 1);
-by (dtac bspec 1 THEN (assume_tac 1));
-by (REPEAT (etac conjE 1));
-by (eresolve_tac [lemma_aux RS exE] 1 THEN (assume_tac 1));
-by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [the_element]) 1);
-val lemma = result();
-
-Goalw AC_defs "AC13(1) ==> AC1";
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSEs [lemma]) 1);
-qed "AC13_AC1";
-
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-(* AC11 ==> AC14 *)
-(* ********************************************************************** *)
-
-Goalw [AC11_def, AC14_def] "AC11 ==> AC14";
-by (fast_tac (claset() addSIs [AC10_AC13]) 1);
-qed "AC11_AC14";