--- a/doc-src/TutorialI/Inductive/document/AB.tex Fri May 18 17:18:43 2001 +0200
+++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/Inductive/document/AB.tex Sat May 19 12:19:23 2001 +0200
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
\isacommand{by}{\isacharparenleft}force\ simp\ add{\isacharcolon}min{\isacharunderscore}less{\isacharunderscore}iff{\isacharunderscore}disj\ split\ add{\isacharcolon}\ nat{\isacharunderscore}diff{\isacharunderscore}split{\isacharparenright}%
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
We conclude this section with a comparison of our proof with
-Hopcroft and Ullman's \cite[p.\ts81]{HopcroftUllman}. For a start, the texbook
+Hopcroft and Ullman's \cite[p.\ts81]{HopcroftUllman}. For a start, the textbook
grammar, for no good reason, excludes the empty word, thus complicating
matters just a little bit: they have 8 instead of our 7 productions.