--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/document/NS_Public.tex Thu Jul 26 17:16:02 2012 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,517 @@
+%
+\begin{isabellebody}%
+\def\isabellecontext{NS{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Public}%
+%
+\isadelimtheory
+%
+\endisadelimtheory
+%
+\isatagtheory
+%
+\endisatagtheory
+{\isafoldtheory}%
+%
+\isadelimtheory
+%
+\endisadelimtheory
+%
+\isamarkupsection{Modelling the Protocol \label{sec:modelling}%
+}
+\isamarkuptrue%
+%
+\begin{figure}
+\begin{isabelle}
+\isacommand{inductive{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}set}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public\ {\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}event\ list\ set{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+\ \ \isakeyword{where}\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\ \ \ Nil{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\ {\isaliteral{7C}{\isacharbar}}\ Fake{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}evsf\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ X\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ synth\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evsf{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Says\ Spy\ B\ X\ \ {\isaliteral{23}{\isacharhash}}\ evsf\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\ {\isaliteral{7C}{\isacharbar}}\ NS{\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}evs{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ Nonce\ NA\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ used\ evs{\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Says\ A\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{23}{\isacharhash}}\ evs{\isadigit{1}}\ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ \ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\ {\isaliteral{7C}{\isacharbar}}\ NS{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}evs{\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ Nonce\ NB\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ used\ evs{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Says\ A{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Says\ B\ A\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{23}{\isacharhash}}\ evs{\isadigit{2}}\ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ \ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\isanewline
+\ {\isaliteral{7C}{\isacharbar}}\ NS{\isadigit{3}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}evs{\isadigit{3}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Says\ A\ \ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isadigit{3}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ Says\ B{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}\ A\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isadigit{3}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Says\ A\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{23}{\isacharhash}}\ evs{\isadigit{3}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
+\end{isabelle}
+\caption{An Inductive Protocol Definition}\label{fig:ns_public}
+\end{figure}
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptext}%
+Let us formalize the Needham-Schroeder public-key protocol, as corrected by
+Lowe:
+\begin{alignat*%
+}{2}
+ &1.&\quad A\to B &: \comp{Na,A}\sb{Kb} \\
+ &2.&\quad B\to A &: \comp{Na,Nb,B}\sb{Ka} \\
+ &3.&\quad A\to B &: \comp{Nb}\sb{Kb}
+\end{alignat*%
+}
+
+Each protocol step is specified by a rule of an inductive definition. An
+event trace has type \isa{event\ list}, so we declare the constant
+\isa{ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public} to be a set of such traces.
+
+Figure~\ref{fig:ns_public} presents the inductive definition. The
+\isa{Nil} rule introduces the empty trace. The \isa{Fake} rule models the
+adversary's sending a message built from components taken from past
+traffic, expressed using the functions \isa{synth} and
+\isa{analz}.
+The next three rules model how honest agents would perform the three
+protocol steps.
+
+Here is a detailed explanation of rule \isa{NS{\isadigit{2}}}.
+A trace containing an event of the form
+\begin{isabelle}%
+\ \ \ \ \ Says\ A{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
+\end{isabelle}
+may be extended by an event of the form
+\begin{isabelle}%
+\ \ \ \ \ Says\ B\ A\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
+\end{isabelle}
+where \isa{NB} is a fresh nonce: \isa{Nonce\ NB\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ used\ evs{\isadigit{2}}}.
+Writing the sender as \isa{A{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}} indicates that \isa{B} does not
+know who sent the message. Calling the trace variable \isa{evs{\isadigit{2}}} rather
+than simply \isa{evs} helps us know where we are in a proof after many
+case-splits: every subgoal mentioning \isa{evs{\isadigit{2}}} involves message~2 of the
+protocol.
+
+Benefits of this approach are simplicity and clarity. The semantic model
+is set theory, proofs are by induction and the translation from the informal
+notation to the inductive rules is straightforward.%
+\end{isamarkuptext}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+%
+\isamarkupsection{Proving Elementary Properties \label{sec:regularity}%
+}
+\isamarkuptrue%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptext}%
+Secrecy properties can be hard to prove. The conclusion of a typical
+secrecy theorem is
+\isa{X\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}}. The difficulty arises from
+having to reason about \isa{analz}, or less formally, showing that the spy
+can never learn~\isa{X}. Much easier is to prove that \isa{X} can never
+occur at all. Such \emph{regularity} properties are typically expressed
+using \isa{parts} rather than \isa{analz}.
+
+The following lemma states that \isa{A}'s private key is potentially
+known to the spy if and only if \isa{A} belongs to the set \isa{bad} of
+compromised agents. The statement uses \isa{parts}: the very presence of
+\isa{A}'s private key in a message, whether protected by encryption or
+not, is enough to confirm that \isa{A} is compromised. The proof, like
+nearly all protocol proofs, is by induction over traces.%
+\end{isamarkuptext}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ Spy{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}see{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}priK\ {\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}simp{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}evs\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Key\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}priK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ simp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}all{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
+\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
+The induction yields five subgoals, one for each rule in the definition of
+\isa{ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public}. The idea is to prove that the protocol property holds initially
+(rule \isa{Nil}), is preserved by each of the legitimate protocol steps (rules
+\isa{NS{\isadigit{1}}}--\isa{{\isadigit{3}}}), and even is preserved in the face of anything the
+spy can do (rule \isa{Fake}).
+
+The proof is trivial. No legitimate protocol rule sends any keys
+at all, so only \isa{Fake} is relevant. Indeed, simplification leaves
+only the \isa{Fake} case, as indicated by the variable name \isa{evsf}:
+\begin{isabelle}%
+\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}evsf\ X{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ }{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}evsf\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ \ }{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Key\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}priK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evsf{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ \ }X\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ synth\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evsf{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ }{\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Key\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}priK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}insert\ X\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evsf{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ }{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
+\end{isabelle}%
+\end{isamarkuptxt}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+\isacommand{by}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ blast%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptext}%
+The \isa{Fake} case is proved automatically. If
+\isa{priK\ A} is in the extended trace then either (1) it was already in the
+original trace or (2) it was
+generated by the spy, who must have known this key already.
+Either way, the induction hypothesis applies.
+
+\emph{Unicity} lemmas are regularity lemmas stating that specified items
+can occur only once in a trace. The following lemma states that a nonce
+cannot be used both as $Na$ and as $Nb$ unless
+it is known to the spy. Intuitively, it holds because honest agents
+always choose fresh values as nonces; only the spy might reuse a value,
+and he doesn't know this particular value. The proof script is short:
+induction, simplification, \isa{blast}. The first line uses the rule
+\isa{rev{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}mp} to prepare the induction by moving two assumptions into the
+induction formula.%
+\end{isamarkuptext}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ no{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}nonce{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NS{\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NS{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ C{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}NA{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ D{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ evs\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Nonce\ NA\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ rev{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}mp{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ erule\ rev{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}mp{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ simp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}all{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}blast\ intro{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ analz{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}insertI{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{2B}{\isacharplus}}\isanewline
+\isacommand{done}\isamarkupfalse%
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptext}%
+The following unicity lemma states that, if \isa{NA} is secret, then its
+appearance in any instance of message~1 determines the other components.
+The proof is similar to the previous one.%
+\end{isamarkuptext}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ unique{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NA{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}Crypt{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ Crypt{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ parts{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ \ Nonce\ NA\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ evs\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ A{\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}A{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C616E643E}{\isasymand}}\ B{\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}B{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isamarkupsection{Proving Secrecy Theorems \label{sec:secrecy}%
+}
+\isamarkuptrue%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptext}%
+The secrecy theorems for Bob (the second participant) are especially
+important because they fail for the original protocol. The following
+theorem states that if Bob sends message~2 to Alice, and both agents are
+uncompromised, then Bob's nonce will never reach the spy.%
+\end{isamarkuptext}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+\isacommand{theorem}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ Spy{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}not{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}see{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NB\ {\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}dest{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\isanewline
+\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}Says\ B\ A\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ B\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ evs\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Nonce\ NB\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
+To prove it, we must formulate the induction properly (one of the
+assumptions mentions~\isa{evs}), apply induction, and simplify:%
+\end{isamarkuptxt}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ rev{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}mp{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ erule\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ simp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}all{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
+\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
+The proof states are too complicated to present in full.
+Let's examine the simplest subgoal, that for message~1. The following
+event has just occurred:
+\[ 1.\quad A'\to B' : \comp{Na',A'}\sb{Kb'} \]
+The variables above have been primed because this step
+belongs to a different run from that referred to in the theorem
+statement --- the theorem
+refers to a past instance of message~2, while this subgoal
+concerns message~1 being sent just now.
+In the Isabelle subgoal, instead of primed variables like $B'$ and $Na'$
+we have \isa{Ba} and~\isa{NAa}:
+\begin{isabelle}%
+\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}evs{\isadigit{1}}\ NAa\ Ba{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ }{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ B\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ evs{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ \ }Says\ B\ A\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ \ }{\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymlongrightarrow}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ \ }Nonce\ NB\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}knows\ Spy\ evs{\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ \ }Nonce\ NAa\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ used\ evs{\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ }{\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Ba\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ bad\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymlongrightarrow}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ }Says\ B\ A\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ }{\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isadigit{1}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymlongrightarrow}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ \ \ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ }NB\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F7465713E}{\isasymnoteq}}\ NAa%
+\end{isabelle}
+The simplifier has used a
+default simplification rule that does a case
+analysis for each encrypted message on whether or not the decryption key
+is compromised.
+\begin{isabelle}%
+analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}insert\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ K\ X{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ H{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\isanewline
+{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}if\ Key\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}invKey\ K{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ analz\ H\isanewline
+\isaindent{{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}}then\ insert\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ K\ X{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}analz\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}insert\ X\ H{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
+\isaindent{{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}}else\ insert\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ K\ X{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}analz\ H{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\rulename{analz{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Crypt{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}if}%
+\end{isabelle}
+The simplifier has also used \isa{Spy{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}see{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}priK}, proved in
+{\S}\ref{sec:regularity} above, to yield \isa{Ba\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ bad}.
+
+Recall that this subgoal concerns the case
+where the last message to be sent was
+\[ 1.\quad A'\to B' : \comp{Na',A'}\sb{Kb'}. \]
+This message can compromise $Nb$ only if $Nb=Na'$ and $B'$ is compromised,
+allowing the spy to decrypt the message. The Isabelle subgoal says
+precisely this, if we allow for its choice of variable names.
+Proving \isa{NB\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F7465713E}{\isasymnoteq}}\ NAa} is easy: \isa{NB} was
+sent earlier, while \isa{NAa} is fresh; formally, we have
+the assumption \isa{Nonce\ NAa\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ used\ evs{\isadigit{1}}}.
+
+Note that our reasoning concerned \isa{B}'s participation in another
+run. Agents may engage in several runs concurrently, and some attacks work
+by interleaving the messages of two runs. With model checking, this
+possibility can cause a state-space explosion, and for us it
+certainly complicates proofs. The biggest subgoal concerns message~2. It
+splits into several cases, such as whether or not the message just sent is
+the very message mentioned in the theorem statement.
+Some of the cases are proved by unicity, others by
+the induction hypothesis. For all those complications, the proofs are
+automatic by \isa{blast} with the theorem \isa{no{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}nonce{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NS{\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NS{\isadigit{2}}}.
+
+The remaining theorems about the protocol are not hard to prove. The
+following one asserts a form of \emph{authenticity}: if
+\isa{B} has sent an instance of message~2 to~\isa{A} and has received the
+expected reply, then that reply really originated with~\isa{A}. The
+proof is a simple induction.%
+\end{isamarkuptxt}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+\isacommand{theorem}\isamarkupfalse%
+\ B{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}trusts{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}NS{\isadigit{3}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\isanewline
+\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}Says\ B\ A\ \ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ A{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ B{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ Says\ A{\isaliteral{27}{\isacharprime}}\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
+\ \ \ A\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ B\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6E6F74696E3E}{\isasymnotin}}\ bad{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ \ evs\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ ns{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}public{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
+\ \ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Says\ A\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Nonce\ NB{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\isatagproof
+%
+\endisatagproof
+{\isafoldproof}%
+%
+\isadelimproof
+%
+\endisadelimproof
+%
+\begin{isamarkuptext}%
+From similar assumptions, we can prove that \isa{A} started the protocol
+run by sending an instance of message~1 involving the nonce~\isa{NA}\@.
+For this theorem, the conclusion is
+\begin{isabelle}%
+Says\ A\ B\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Crypt\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}pubK\ B{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C62726163653E}{\isasymlbrace}}Nonce\ NA{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ Agent\ A{\isaliteral{5C3C7262726163653E}{\isasymrbrace}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ set\ evs%
+\end{isabelle}
+Analogous theorems can be proved for~\isa{A}, stating that nonce~\isa{NA}
+remains secret and that message~2 really originates with~\isa{B}. Even the
+flawed protocol establishes these properties for~\isa{A};
+the flaw only harms the second participant.
+
+\medskip
+
+Detailed information on this protocol verification technique can be found
+elsewhere~\cite{paulson-jcs}, including proofs of an Internet
+protocol~\cite{paulson-tls}. We must stress that the protocol discussed
+in this chapter is trivial. There are only three messages; no keys are
+exchanged; we merely have to prove that encrypted data remains secret.
+Real world protocols are much longer and distribute many secrets to their
+participants. To be realistic, the model has to include the possibility
+of keys being lost dynamically due to carelessness. If those keys have
+been used to encrypt other sensitive information, there may be cascading
+losses. We may still be able to establish a bound on the losses and to
+prove that other protocol runs function
+correctly~\cite{paulson-yahalom}. Proofs of real-world protocols follow
+the strategy illustrated above, but the subgoals can
+be much bigger and there are more of them.
+\index{protocols!security|)}%
+\end{isamarkuptext}%
+\isamarkuptrue%
+%
+\isadelimtheory
+%
+\endisadelimtheory
+%
+\isatagtheory
+%
+\endisatagtheory
+{\isafoldtheory}%
+%
+\isadelimtheory
+%
+\endisadelimtheory
+\end{isabellebody}%
+%%% Local Variables:
+%%% mode: latex
+%%% TeX-master: "root"
+%%% End: