--- a/src/HOL/Probability/Fin_Map.thy Mon Nov 19 16:14:18 2012 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Probability/Fin_Map.thy Mon Nov 19 12:29:02 2012 +0100
@@ -1284,17 +1284,16 @@
assumes "finite J"
shows "(\<lambda>m. compose J m f) \<in> measurable (PiM (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M)) (PiM J (\<lambda>_. M))"
proof (rule measurable_PiM)
- show "(\<lambda>m. compose J m f)
- \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M)) \<rightarrow>
- (J \<rightarrow> space M) \<inter> extensional J"
+ show "(\<lambda>m. compose J m f) \<in> space (Pi\<^isub>M (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M)) \<rightarrow> (J \<rightarrow>\<^isub>E space M)"
proof safe
fix x and i
assume x: "x \<in> space (PiM (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M))" "i \<in> J"
with inj show "compose J x f i \<in> space M"
by (auto simp: space_PiM compose_def)
next
- fix x assume "x \<in> space (PiM (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M))"
- show "(compose J x f) \<in> extensional J" by (rule compose_extensional)
+ fix x i assume "i \<notin> J"
+ with compose_extensional[of J x f]
+ show "compose J x f i = undefined" by (auto simp: extensional_def)
qed
next
fix S X
@@ -1303,7 +1302,7 @@
have "(\<lambda>m. compose J m f) -` prod_emb J (\<lambda>_. M) S (Pi\<^isub>E S X) \<inter>
space (Pi\<^isub>M (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M)) = prod_emb (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M) (f ` S) (Pi\<^isub>E (f ` S) (\<lambda>b. X (f' b)))"
using assms inv S sets_into_space[OF P]
- by (force simp: prod_emb_iff compose_def space_PiM extensional_def Pi_def intro: imageI)
+ by (force simp: prod_emb_iff compose_def space_PiM extensional_def Pi_def PiE_def intro: imageI)
also have "\<dots> \<in> sets (Pi\<^isub>M (f ` J) (\<lambda>_. M))"
proof
from S show "f ` S \<subseteq> f ` J" by auto
@@ -1379,7 +1378,7 @@
assumes "\<And>i. space (M i) = UNIV"
shows "inj_on fm (space (Pi\<^isub>M J M))"
using assms
- apply (auto simp: fm_def space_PiM)
+ apply (auto simp: fm_def space_PiM PiE_def)
apply (rule comp_inj_on)
apply (rule inj_on_compose_f')
apply (rule finmap_of_inj_on_extensional_finite)
@@ -1409,7 +1408,7 @@
by (auto simp: mf_def extensional_def compose_def)
moreover
have "x \<in> extensional J" using assms sets_into_space
- by (force simp: space_PiM)
+ by (force simp: space_PiM PiE_def)
moreover
{ fix i assume "i \<in> J"
hence "mf (fm x) i = x i"
@@ -1472,13 +1471,13 @@
lemma mapmeasure_PiF:
assumes s1: "space M = space (Pi\<^isub>M J (\<lambda>_. N))"
- assumes s2: "sets M = (Pi\<^isub>M J (\<lambda>_. N))"
+ assumes s2: "sets M = sets (Pi\<^isub>M J (\<lambda>_. N))"
assumes "space N = UNIV"
assumes "X \<in> sets (PiF (Collect finite) (\<lambda>_. N))"
shows "emeasure (mapmeasure M (\<lambda>_. N)) X = emeasure M ((fm -` X \<inter> extensional J))"
using assms
by (auto simp: measurable_eqI[OF s1 refl s2 refl] mapmeasure_def emeasure_distr
- fm_measurable space_PiM)
+ fm_measurable space_PiM PiE_def)
lemma mapmeasure_PiM:
fixes N::"'c measure"