src/HOL/Data_Structures/Balance_List.thy
changeset 63829 6a05c8cbf7de
parent 63828 ca467e73f912
child 63830 2ea3725a34bd
--- a/src/HOL/Data_Structures/Balance_List.thy	Fri Sep 09 13:39:21 2016 +0200
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
-(* Tobias Nipkow *)
-
-section \<open>Creating a Balanced Tree from a List\<close>
-
-theory Balance_List
-imports
-  "~~/src/HOL/Library/Tree"
-  "~~/src/HOL/Library/Log_Nat"
-begin
-
-fun bal :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a tree * 'a list" where
-"bal xs n = (if n=0 then (Leaf,xs) else
- (let m = n div 2;
-      (l, ys) = bal xs m;
-      (r, zs) = bal (tl ys) (n-1-m)
-  in (Node l (hd ys) r, zs)))"
-
-declare bal.simps[simp del]
-
-definition "balance xs = fst (bal xs (length xs))"
-
-lemma bal_inorder:
-  "\<lbrakk> bal xs n = (t,ys); n \<le> length xs \<rbrakk>
-  \<Longrightarrow> inorder t = take n xs \<and> ys = drop n xs"
-proof(induction xs n arbitrary: t ys rule: bal.induct)
-  case (1 xs n) show ?case
-  proof cases
-    assume "n = 0" thus ?thesis using 1 by (simp add: bal.simps)
-  next
-    assume [arith]: "n \<noteq> 0"
-    let ?n1 = "n div 2" let ?n2 = "n - 1 - ?n1"
-    from "1.prems" obtain l r xs' where
-      b1: "bal xs ?n1 = (l,xs')" and
-      b2: "bal (tl xs') ?n2 = (r,ys)" and
-      t: "t = \<langle>l, hd xs', r\<rangle>"
-      using bal.simps[of xs n] by(auto simp: Let_def split: prod.splits)
-    have IH1: "inorder l = take ?n1 xs \<and> xs' = drop ?n1 xs"
-      using b1 "1.prems" by(intro "1.IH"(1)) auto
-    have IH2: "inorder r = take ?n2 (tl xs') \<and> ys = drop ?n2 (tl xs')"
-      using b1 b2 IH1 "1.prems" by(intro "1.IH"(2)) auto
-    have "drop (n div 2) xs \<noteq> []" using "1.prems"(2) by simp
-    hence "hd (drop ?n1 xs) # take ?n2 (tl (drop ?n1 xs)) = take (?n2 + 1) (drop ?n1 xs)"
-      by (metis Suc_eq_plus1 take_Suc)
-    hence *: "inorder t = take n xs" using t IH1 IH2
-      using take_add[of ?n1 "?n2+1" xs] by(simp)
-    have "n - n div 2 + n div 2 = n" by simp
-    hence "ys = drop n xs" using IH1 IH2 by (simp add: drop_Suc[symmetric])
-    thus ?thesis using * by blast
-  qed
-qed
-
-corollary balance_inorder: "inorder(balance xs) = xs"
-using bal_inorder[of xs "length xs"]
-by (metis balance_def order_refl prod.collapse take_all)
-
-lemma bal_height: "bal xs n = (t,ys) \<Longrightarrow> height t = floorlog 2 n"
-proof(induction xs n arbitrary: t ys rule: bal.induct)
-  case (1 xs n) show ?case
-  proof cases
-    assume "n = 0" thus ?thesis
-      using "1.prems" by (simp add: floorlog_def bal.simps)
-  next
-    assume [arith]: "n \<noteq> 0"
-    from "1.prems" obtain l r xs' where
-      b1: "bal xs (n div 2) = (l,xs')" and
-      b2: "bal (tl xs') (n - 1 - n div 2) = (r,ys)" and
-      t: "t = \<langle>l, hd xs', r\<rangle>"
-      using bal.simps[of xs n] by(auto simp: Let_def split: prod.splits)
-    let ?log1 = "floorlog 2 (n div 2)"
-    let ?log2 = "floorlog 2 (n - 1 - n div 2)"
-    have IH1: "height l = ?log1" using "1.IH"(1) b1 by simp
-    have IH2: "height r = ?log2" using "1.IH"(2) b1 b2 by simp
-    have "n div 2 \<ge> n - 1 - n div 2" by arith
-    hence le: "?log2 \<le> ?log1" by(simp add:floorlog_mono)
-    have "height t = max ?log1 ?log2 + 1" by (simp add: t IH1 IH2)
-    also have "\<dots> = ?log1 + 1" using le by (simp add: max_absorb1)
-    also have "\<dots> = floorlog 2 n" by (simp add: compute_floorlog)
-    finally show ?thesis .
-  qed
-qed
-
-lemma bal_min_height:
-  "bal xs n = (t,ys) \<Longrightarrow> min_height t = floorlog 2 (n + 1) - 1"
-proof(induction xs n arbitrary: t ys rule: bal.induct)
-  case (1 xs n) show ?case
-  proof cases
-    assume "n = 0" thus ?thesis
-      using "1.prems" by (simp add: floorlog_def bal.simps)
-  next
-    assume [arith]: "n \<noteq> 0"
-    from "1.prems" obtain l r xs' where
-      b1: "bal xs (n div 2) = (l,xs')" and
-      b2: "bal (tl xs') (n - 1 - n div 2) = (r,ys)" and
-      t: "t = \<langle>l, hd xs', r\<rangle>"
-      using bal.simps[of xs n] by(auto simp: Let_def split: prod.splits)
-    let ?log1 = "floorlog 2 (n div 2 + 1) - 1"
-    let ?log2 = "floorlog 2 (n - 1 - n div 2 + 1) - 1"
-    let ?log2' = "floorlog 2 (n - n div 2) - 1"
-    have "n - 1 - n div 2 + 1 = n - n div 2" by arith
-    hence IH2: "min_height r = ?log2'" using "1.IH"(2) b1 b2 by simp
-    have IH1: "min_height l = ?log1" using "1.IH"(1) b1 by simp
-    have *: "floorlog 2 (n - n div 2) \<ge> 1" by (simp add: floorlog_def)
-    have "n div 2 + 1 \<ge> n - n div 2" by arith
-    with * have le: "?log2' \<le> ?log1" by(simp add: floorlog_mono diff_le_mono)
-    have "min_height t = min ?log1 ?log2' + 1" by (simp add: t IH1 IH2)
-    also have "\<dots> = ?log2' + 1" using le by (simp add: min_absorb2)
-    also have "\<dots> = floorlog 2 (n - n div 2)" by(simp add: floorlog_def)
-    also have "n - n div 2 = (n+1) div 2" by arith
-    also have "floorlog 2 \<dots> = floorlog 2 (n+1) - 1"
-      by (simp add: compute_floorlog)
-    finally show ?thesis .
-  qed
-qed
-
-lemma balanced_bal:
-  assumes "bal xs n = (t,ys)" shows "balanced t"
-proof -
-  have "floorlog 2 n \<le> floorlog 2 (n+1)" by (rule floorlog_mono) auto
-  thus ?thesis
-    using bal_height[OF assms] bal_min_height[OF assms] by arith
-qed
-
-corollary balanced_balance: "balanced (balance xs)"
-by (metis balance_def balanced_bal prod.collapse)
-
-end