--- a/doc-src/IsarRef/Thy/document/Generic.tex Mon Feb 27 15:36:24 2012 +0100
+++ b/doc-src/IsarRef/Thy/document/Generic.tex Mon Feb 27 15:39:47 2012 +0100
@@ -531,11 +531,11 @@
\cite{isabelle-implementation}).
\item \hyperlink{method.cut-tac}{\mbox{\isa{cut{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}tac}}} inserts facts into the proof state as
- assumption of a subgoal, see also \verb|Tactic.cut_facts_tac| in
- \cite{isabelle-implementation}. Note that the scope of schematic
- variables is spread over the main goal statement. Instantiations
- may be given as well, see also ML tactic \verb|cut_inst_tac| in
- \cite{isabelle-implementation}.
+ assumption of a subgoal; instantiations may be given as well. Note
+ that the scope of schematic variables is spread over the main goal
+ statement and rule premises are turned into new subgoals. This is
+ in contrast to the regular method \hyperlink{method.insert}{\mbox{\isa{insert}}} which inserts
+ closed rule statements.
\item \hyperlink{method.thin-tac}{\mbox{\isa{thin{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}tac}}}~\isa{{\isaliteral{5C3C7068693E}{\isasymphi}}} deletes the specified premise
from a subgoal. Note that \isa{{\isaliteral{5C3C7068693E}{\isasymphi}}} may contain schematic