--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/FOL/simpdata.ML Thu Sep 16 12:20:38 1993 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+(* Title: FOL/simpdata
+ ID: $Id$
+ Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
+ Copyright 1991 University of Cambridge
+
+Simplification data for FOL
+*)
+
+(*** Rewrite rules ***)
+
+fun int_prove_fun s =
+ (writeln s; prove_goal IFOL.thy s
+ (fn prems => [ (cut_facts_tac prems 1), (Int.fast_tac 1) ]));
+
+val conj_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["P & True <-> P", "True & P <-> P",
+ "P & False <-> False", "False & P <-> False",
+ "P & P <-> P",
+ "P & ~P <-> False", "~P & P <-> False",
+ "(P & Q) & R <-> P & (Q & R)"];
+
+val disj_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["P | True <-> True", "True | P <-> True",
+ "P | False <-> P", "False | P <-> P",
+ "P | P <-> P",
+ "(P | Q) | R <-> P | (Q | R)"];
+
+val not_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["~ False <-> True", "~ True <-> False"];
+
+val imp_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["(P --> False) <-> ~P", "(P --> True) <-> True",
+ "(False --> P) <-> True", "(True --> P) <-> P",
+ "(P --> P) <-> True", "(P --> ~P) <-> ~P"];
+
+val iff_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["(True <-> P) <-> P", "(P <-> True) <-> P",
+ "(P <-> P) <-> True",
+ "(False <-> P) <-> ~P", "(P <-> False) <-> ~P"];
+
+val quant_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["(ALL x.P) <-> P", "(EX x.P) <-> P"];
+
+(*These are NOT supplied by default!*)
+val distrib_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["~(P|Q) <-> ~P & ~Q",
+ "P & (Q | R) <-> P&Q | P&R", "(Q | R) & P <-> Q&P | R&P",
+ "(P | Q --> R) <-> (P --> R) & (Q --> R)"];
+
+val P_Imp_P_iff_T = int_prove_fun "P ==> (P <-> True)";
+
+fun make_iff_T th = th RS P_Imp_P_iff_T;
+
+val refl_iff_T = make_iff_T refl;
+
+val notFalseI = int_prove_fun "~False";
+
+(* Conversion into rewrite rules *)
+
+val not_P_imp_P_iff_F = int_prove_fun "~P ==> (P <-> False)";
+
+fun mk_meta_eq th = case concl_of th of
+ _ $ (Const("op <->",_)$_$_) => th RS iff_reflection
+ | _ $ (Const("op =",_)$_$_) => th RS eq_reflection
+ | _ $ (Const("Not",_)$_) => (th RS not_P_imp_P_iff_F) RS iff_reflection
+ | _ => (make_iff_T th) RS iff_reflection;
+
+fun atomize th = case concl_of th of (*The operator below is Trueprop*)
+ _ $ (Const("op -->",_) $ _ $ _) => atomize(th RS mp)
+ | _ $ (Const("op &",_) $ _ $ _) => atomize(th RS conjunct1) @
+ atomize(th RS conjunct2)
+ | _ $ (Const("All",_) $ _) => atomize(th RS spec)
+ | _ $ (Const("True",_)) => []
+ | _ $ (Const("False",_)) => []
+ | _ => [th];
+
+fun mk_rew_rules th = map mk_meta_eq (atomize th);
+
+structure Induction = InductionFun(struct val spec=IFOL.spec end);
+
+val IFOL_rews =
+ [refl_iff_T] @ conj_rews @ disj_rews @ not_rews @
+ imp_rews @ iff_rews @ quant_rews;
+
+open Simplifier Induction;
+
+val IFOL_ss = empty_ss
+ setmksimps mk_rew_rules
+ setsolver
+ (fn prems => resolve_tac (TrueI::refl::iff_refl::notFalseI::prems))
+ setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac
+ addsimps IFOL_rews
+ addcongs [imp_cong RS iff_reflection];
+
+(*Classical version...*)
+fun prove_fun s =
+ (writeln s; prove_goal FOL.thy s
+ (fn prems => [ (cut_facts_tac prems 1), (Cla.fast_tac FOL_cs 1) ]));
+
+val cla_rews = map prove_fun
+ ["P | ~P", "~P | P",
+ "~ ~ P <-> P", "(~P --> P) <-> P"];
+
+val FOL_ss = IFOL_ss addsimps cla_rews;
+
+(*** case splitting ***)
+
+val split_tac =
+ let val eq_reflection2 = prove_goal FOL.thy "x==y ==> x=y"
+ (fn [prem] => [rewtac prem, rtac refl 1])
+ val iff_reflection2 = prove_goal FOL.thy "x==y ==> x<->y"
+ (fn [prem] => [rewtac prem, rtac iff_refl 1])
+ val [iffD] = [eq_reflection2,iff_reflection2] RL [iffD2]
+ in fn splits => mk_case_split_tac iffD (map mk_meta_eq splits) end;