src/FOLP/ex/cla.ML

--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/FOLP/ex/cla.ML	Thu Sep 16 12:20:38 1993 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,360 @@
+(*  Title: 	FOLP/ex/cla
+    ID:         $Id$
+    Author: 	Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
+    Copyright   1993  University of Cambridge
+
+Classical First-Order Logic
+*)
+
+writeln"File FOL/ex/cla.";
+
+open Cla;    (*in case structure Int is open!*)
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (P --> Q | R) --> (P-->Q) | (P-->R)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*If and only if*)
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (P<->Q) <-> (Q<->P)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ~ (P <-> ~P)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+
+(*Sample problems from 
+  F. J. Pelletier, 
+  Seventy-Five Problems for Testing Automatic Theorem Provers,
+  J. Automated Reasoning 2 (1986), 191-216.
+  Errata, JAR 4 (1988), 236-236.
+
+The hardest problems -- judging by experience with several theorem provers,
+including matrix ones -- are 34 and 43.
+*)
+
+writeln"Pelletier's examples";
+(*1*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (P-->Q)  <->  (~Q --> ~P)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*2*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ~ ~ P  <->  P";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*3*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ~(P-->Q) --> (Q-->P)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*4*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (~P-->Q)  <->  (~Q --> P)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*5*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ((P|Q)-->(P|R)) --> (P|(Q-->R))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*6*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : P | ~ P";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*7*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : P | ~ ~ ~ P";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*8.  Peirce's law*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ((P-->Q) --> P)  -->  P";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*9*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ((P|Q) & (~P|Q) & (P| ~Q)) --> ~ (~P | ~Q)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*10*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (Q-->R) & (R-->P&Q) & (P-->Q|R) --> (P<->Q)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*11.  Proved in each direction (incorrectly, says Pelletier!!)  *)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : P<->P";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*12.  "Dijkstra's law"*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ((P <-> Q) <-> R)  <->  (P <-> (Q <-> R))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*13.  Distributive law*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : P | (Q & R)  <-> (P | Q) & (P | R)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*14*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (P <-> Q) <-> ((Q | ~P) & (~Q|P))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*15*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (P --> Q) <-> (~P | Q)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*16*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (P-->Q) | (Q-->P)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+(*17*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ((P & (Q-->R))-->S) <-> ((~P | Q | S) & (~P | ~R | S))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Classical Logic: examples with quantifiers";
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x) & Q(x)) <-> (ALL x. P(x))  &  (ALL x. Q(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result(); 
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX x. P-->Q(x))  <->  (P --> (EX x.Q(x)))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result(); 
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX x.P(x)-->Q)  <->  (ALL x.P(x)) --> Q";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result(); 
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x.P(x)) | Q  <->  (ALL x. P(x) | Q)";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result(); 
+
+writeln"Problems requiring quantifier duplication";
+
+(*Needs multiple instantiation of ALL.*)
+(*
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x)-->P(f(x)))  &  P(d)-->P(f(f(f(d))))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+*)
+(*Needs double instantiation of the quantifier*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : EX x. P(x) --> P(a) & P(b)";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : EX z. P(z) --> (ALL x. P(x))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+
+
+writeln"Hard examples with quantifiers";
+
+writeln"Problem 18";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : EX y. ALL x. P(y)-->P(x)";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result(); 
+
+writeln"Problem 19";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : EX x. ALL y z. (P(y)-->Q(z)) --> (P(x)-->Q(x))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 20";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x y. EX z. ALL w. (P(x)&Q(y)-->R(z)&S(w)))     \
+\   --> (EX x y. P(x) & Q(y)) --> (EX z. R(z))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1); 
+result();
+(*
+writeln"Problem 21";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX x. P-->Q(x)) & (EX x. Q(x)-->P) --> (EX x. P<->Q(x))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+*)
+writeln"Problem 22";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P <-> Q(x))  -->  (P <-> (ALL x. Q(x)))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 23";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P | Q(x))  <->  (P | (ALL x. Q(x)))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_cs 1);  
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 24";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ~(EX x. S(x)&Q(x)) & (ALL x. P(x) --> Q(x)|R(x)) &  \
+\    ~(EX x.P(x)) --> (EX x.Q(x)) & (ALL x. Q(x)|R(x) --> S(x))  \
+\   --> (EX x. P(x)&R(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1); 
+result();
+(*
+writeln"Problem 25";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX x. P(x)) &  \
+\       (ALL x. L(x) --> ~ (M(x) & R(x))) &  \
+\       (ALL x. P(x) --> (M(x) & L(x))) &   \
+\       ((ALL x. P(x)-->Q(x)) | (EX x. P(x)&R(x)))  \
+\   --> (EX x. Q(x)&P(x))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_cs 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 26";
+goal FOLP.thy "?u : ((EX x. p(x)) <-> (EX x. q(x))) &	\
+\     (ALL x. ALL y. p(x) & q(y) --> (r(x) <-> s(y)))	\
+\ --> ((ALL x. p(x)-->r(x)) <-> (ALL x. q(x)-->s(x)))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+*)
+writeln"Problem 27";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX x. P(x) & ~Q(x)) &   \
+\             (ALL x. P(x) --> R(x)) &   \
+\             (ALL x. M(x) & L(x) --> P(x)) &   \
+\             ((EX x. R(x) & ~ Q(x)) --> (ALL x. L(x) --> ~ R(x)))  \
+\         --> (ALL x. M(x) --> ~L(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 28.  AMENDED";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x) --> (ALL x. Q(x))) &   \
+\       ((ALL x. Q(x)|R(x)) --> (EX x. Q(x)&S(x))) &  \
+\       ((EX x.S(x)) --> (ALL x. L(x) --> M(x)))  \
+\   --> (ALL x. P(x) & L(x) --> M(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);  
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 29.  Essentially the same as Principia Mathematica *11.71";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX x. P(x)) & (EX y. Q(y))  \
+\   --> ((ALL x. P(x)-->R(x)) & (ALL y. Q(y)-->S(y))   <->     \
+\        (ALL x y. P(x) & Q(y) --> R(x) & S(y)))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1); 
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 30";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x) | Q(x) --> ~ R(x)) & \
+\       (ALL x. (Q(x) --> ~ S(x)) --> P(x) & R(x))  \
+\   --> (ALL x. S(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);  
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 31";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ~(EX x.P(x) & (Q(x) | R(x))) & \
+\       (EX x. L(x) & P(x)) & \
+\       (ALL x. ~ R(x) --> M(x))  \
+\   --> (EX x. L(x) & M(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 32";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x) & (Q(x)|R(x))-->S(x)) & \
+\       (ALL x. S(x) & R(x) --> L(x)) & \
+\       (ALL x. M(x) --> R(x))  \
+\   --> (ALL x. P(x) & M(x) --> L(x))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 33";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(a) & (P(x)-->P(b))-->P(c))  <->    \
+\    (ALL x. (~P(a) | P(x) | P(c)) & (~P(a) | ~P(b) | P(c)))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 35";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : EX x y. P(x,y) -->  (ALL u v. P(u,v))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 36";
+goal FOLP.thy
+"?p : (ALL x. EX y. J(x,y)) & \
+\     (ALL x. EX y. G(x,y)) & \
+\     (ALL x y. J(x,y) | G(x,y) --> (ALL z. J(y,z) | G(y,z) --> H(x,z)))   \
+\ --> (ALL x. EX y. H(x,y))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 37";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL z. EX w. ALL x. EX y. \
+\          (P(x,z)-->P(y,w)) & P(y,z) & (P(y,w) --> (EX u.Q(u,w)))) & \
+\       (ALL x z. ~P(x,z) --> (EX y. Q(y,z))) & \
+\       ((EX x y. Q(x,y)) --> (ALL x. R(x,x)))  \
+\   --> (ALL x. EX y. R(x,y))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 39";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : ~ (EX x. ALL y. F(y,x) <-> ~F(y,y))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 40.  AMENDED";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (EX y. ALL x. F(x,y) <-> F(x,x)) -->  \
+\             ~(ALL x. EX y. ALL z. F(z,y) <-> ~ F(z,x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 41";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL z. EX y. ALL x. f(x,y) <-> f(x,z) & ~ f(x,x))	\
+\         --> ~ (EX z. ALL x. f(x,z))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 44";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. f(x) -->					\
+\             (EX y. g(y) & h(x,y) & (EX y. g(y) & ~ h(x,y))))  &   	\
+\             (EX x. j(x) & (ALL y. g(y) --> h(x,y)))			\
+\             --> (EX x. j(x) & ~f(x))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problems (mainly) involving equality or functions";
+
+writeln"Problem 48";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (a=b | c=d) & (a=c | b=d) --> a=d | b=c";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 50";  
+(*What has this to do with equality?*)
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(a,x) | (ALL y.P(x,y))) --> (EX x. ALL y.P(x,y))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 56";
+goal FOLP.thy
+ "?p : (ALL x. (EX y. P(y) & x=f(y)) --> P(x)) <-> (ALL x. P(x) --> P(f(x)))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 57";
+goal FOLP.thy
+"?p : P(f(a,b), f(b,c)) & P(f(b,c), f(a,c)) & \
+\     (ALL x y z. P(x,y) & P(y,z) --> P(x,z))    -->   P(f(a,b), f(a,c))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 58  NOT PROVED AUTOMATICALLY";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x y. f(x)=g(y)) --> (ALL x y. f(f(x))=f(g(y)))";
+val f_cong = read_instantiate [("t","f")] subst_context;
+by (fast_tac (FOLP_cs addIs [f_cong]) 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 59";
+goal FOLP.thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x) <-> ~P(f(x))) --> (EX x. P(x) & ~P(f(x)))";
+by (best_tac FOLP_dup_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Problem 60";
+goal FOLP.thy
+"?p : ALL x. P(x,f(x)) <-> (EX y. (ALL z. P(z,y) --> P(z,f(x))) & P(x,y))";
+by (fast_tac FOLP_cs 1);
+result();
+
+writeln"Reached end of file.";