Admin/website/faq.html
changeset 16233 e634d33deb86
child 16240 95cc0e8f8a17
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/Admin/website/faq.html	Sat Jun 04 10:26:08 2005 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+<?xml version='1.0' encoding='iso-8859-1' ?>
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
+<?cvs id="$Id$"?>
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
+
+<head>
+    <title>Isabelle FAQ</title>
+    <?include file="//include/htmlheader.include.html"?>
+</head>
+
+<body class="main">
+    <?include file="//include/header.include.html"?>
+    <div class="hr"><hr/></div>
+    <?include file="//include/navigation.include.html"?>
+    <div class="hr"><hr/></div>
+    <div id="content">
+
+    <h2>General Questions</h2>
+
+    <dl class="faq">
+
+      <dt>What is Isabelle?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Isabelle is a popular generic theorem proving environment developed
+          at Cambridge University (<a href=
+          "http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/lcp/">Larry Paulson</a>) and TU Munich
+          (<a href="http://www.in.tum.de/~nipkow/">Tobias Nipkow</a>). See the
+          <a href="http://isabelle.in.tum.de/">Isabelle homepage</a> for more
+          information.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Where can I find documentation?</dt>
+    
+      <dd><a href="http://isabelle.in.tum.de/docs.html">This way, please</a>.
+          Also have a look at the <a href=
+          "http://isabelle.in.tum.de/library/">theory library</a>.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Is it available for download?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Yes, it is available from <a href=
+          "http://isabelle.in.tum.de/dist/">several mirror sites</a>. It should run
+          on most recent Unix systems (Solaris, Linux, MacOS X, etc.).</dd>
+    
+</dl>
+      <h2>Syntax</h2>
+
+    <dl class="faq">
+    
+      <dt>There are lots of arrows in Isabelle. What's the difference between
+          <tt>-&gt;</tt>, <tt>=&gt;</tt>, <tt>--&gt;</tt>, and <tt>==&gt;</tt>
+          ?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Isabelle uses the <tt>=&gt;</tt> arrow for the function type
+          (contrary to most functional languages which use <tt>-&gt;</tt>). So
+          <tt>a =&gt; b</tt> is the type of a function that takes an element of
+          <tt>a</tt> as input and gives you an element of <tt>b</tt> as output. The
+          long arrow <tt>--&gt;</tt> and <tt>==&gt;</tt> are object and meta level
+          implication. Roughly speaking, the meta level implication should only be
+          used when stating theorems where it separates the assumptions from the
+          conclusion. Whenever you need an implication inside a HOL formula, use
+          <code>--&gt;</code>.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Where do I have to put those double quotes?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Isabelle distinguishes between <em>inner</em> and <em>outer</em>
+          syntax. The outer syntax comes from the Isabelle framework, the inner
+          syntax is the one in between quotation marks and comes from the object
+          logic (in this case HOL). With time the distinction between the two
+          becomes obvious, but in the beginning the following rules of thumb may
+          work: types should be inside quotation marks, formulas and lemmas should
+          be inside quotation marks, rules and equations (e.g. for definitions)
+          should be inside quotation marks, commands like <tt>lemma</tt>,
+          <tt>consts</tt>, <tt>primrec</tt>, <tt>constdefs</tt>, <tt>apply</tt>,
+          <tt>done</tt> are without quotation marks, as are the names of constants
+          in constant definitions (<tt>consts</tt> and <tt>constdefs</tt>)</dd>
+    
+      <dt>What is <tt>"No such constant: _case_syntax"</tt> supposed to tell
+          me?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>You get this message if you use a case construct on a datatype and
+          have a typo in the names of the constructor patterns or if the order of
+          the constructors in the case pattern is different from the order in which
+          they where defined (in the datatype definition).</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Why doesn't Isabelle understand my equation?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Isabelle's equality <tt>=</tt> binds relatively strongly, so an
+          equation like <tt>a = b &amp; c</tt> might not be what you intend.
+          Isabelle parses it as <tt>(a = b) &amp; c</tt>. If you want it the other
+          way around, you must set explicit parentheses as in <tt>a = (b &amp;
+          c)</tt>. This also applies to e.g. <tt>primrec</tt> definitions (see
+          below).</dd>
+    
+      <dt>What does it mean "not a proper equation"?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Most commonly this is an instance of the question above. The
+          <tt>primrec</tt> command (and others) expect equations as input, and
+          since equality binds strongly in Isabelle, something like <tt>f x = b
+          &amp; c</tt> is not what you might expect it to be: Isabelle parses it as
+          <tt>(f x = b) &amp; c</tt> (which is indeed not a proper equation). To
+          turn it into an equation you must set explicit parentheses: <tt>f x = (b
+          &amp; c)</tt>.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>What does it mean "<tt>Not a meta-equality (==)</tt>"?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>This usually occurs if you use <tt>=</tt> for <tt>constdefs</tt>. The
+          <tt>constdefs</tt> and <tt>defs</tt> commands expect not equations, but
+          meta equivalences. Just use the <tt>\&lt;equiv&gt;</tt> or <tt>==</tt>
+          signs instead of <tt>=</tt>.</dd>
+    
+</dl>
+      <h2>Proving</h2>
+
+    <dl class="faq">
+    
+      <dt>What does "empty result sequence" mean?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>It means that the applied proof method (or tactic) was unsuccessful.
+          It did not transform the goal in any way, or simply just failed to do
+          anything. You must try another tactic (or give the one you used more
+          hints or lemmas to work with)</dd>
+    
+      <dt>The Simplifier doesn't want to apply my rule, what's wrong?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Most commonly this is a typing problem. The rule you want to apply
+          may require a more special (or just plain different) type from what you
+          have in the current goal. Use the ProofGeneral menu <tt>Isabelle/Isar
+          -&gt; Settings -&gt; Show Types</tt> and the <tt>thm</tt> command on the
+          rule you want to apply to find out if the types are what you expect them
+          to be (also take a look at the types in your goal). <tt>Show Sorts</tt>,
+          <tt>Show Constants</tt>, and <tt>Trace Simplifier</tt> in the same menu
+          may also be helpful.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>If I do <tt>auto</tt>, it leaves me a goal <tt>False</tt>. Is my
+          theorem wrong?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Not necessarily. It just means that <tt>auto</tt> transformed the
+          goal into something that is not provable any more. That could be due to
+          <tt>auto</tt> doing something stupid, or e.g. due to some earlier step in
+          the proof that lost important information. It is of course also possible
+          that the goal was never provable in the first place.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Why does <tt>lemma "1+1=2"</tt> fail?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>Because it is not necessarily true. Isabelle does not assume that 1
+          and 2 are natural numbers. Try <tt>"(1::nat)+1=2"</tt> instead.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Can Isabelle find counterexamples?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>
+            <p>For arithmetic goals, <code>arith</code> finds counterexamples. For
+            executable goals, <code>quickcheck</code> tries to find a
+            counterexample. For goals of a more logical nature (including
+            quantifiers, sets and inductive definitions) <code>refute</code>
+            searches for a countermodel.</p>
+    
+            <p>Otherwise, negate the proposition and instantiate (some) variables
+            with concrete values. You may also need additional assumptions about
+            these values. For example, <tt>True &amp; False ~= True | False</tt> is
+            a counterexample of <tt>A &amp; B = A | B</tt>, and <tt>A = ~B ==&gt; A
+            &amp; B ~= A | B</tt> is another one. Sometimes Isabelle can help you
+            to find the counterexample: just negate the proposition and do
+            <tt>auto</tt> or <tt>simp</tt>. If lucky, you are left with the
+            assumptions you need for the counterexample to work.</p>
+          </dd>
+    
+</dl>
+      <h2>Interface</h2>
+
+    <dl class="faq">
+    
+      <dt>ProofGeneral appears to hang when Isabelle is started.</dt>
+      <dd><p>This may be because of UTF-8 issues e.g. in Red Hat 8.0/9.0, Suse
+      9.0/9.1</p>
+      <p>RedHat 8 and later has glibc 2.2 and UTF8 encoded output may be turned on
+      in default locale. Unfortunately Proof General relies on 8-bit characters
+      which are UTF8 prefixes in the output of proof assistants (inc Coq,
+      Isabelle). These prefix characters are not flushed to stdout individually. As
+      a workaround we must find a way to disable interpretation of UTF8 in the C
+      libraries that Coq and friends use.</p>
+    
+      <p>Doing this inside PG/Emacs seems tricky; locale settings are set/inherited
+      in strange ways. One solution is to run the Emacs process itself with an
+      altered locale setting, for example, starting XEmacs by typing:</p>
+    
+      <p><tt>$ LC_CTYPE=en_GB Isabelle &amp;</tt></p>
+    
+      <p>The supplied proofgeneral script makes this setting if it sees the string
+      UTF in the current value of LC_CTYPE. Depending on your distribution, this
+      variable might also be called <tt>LANG</tt>.</p>
+    
+      <p>Alternatively you can set LC_CTYPE or LANG inside a file ~/.i18n, which
+      will be read by the shell. This will affect all applications, though. [
+      suggestions for a better workaround inside Emacs would be welcome ]</p>
+    
+      <p>NB: a related issue is warnings from x-symbol: "Emacs language environment
+      and system locale specify different encoding, I'll assume `iso-8859-1'". This
+      warning appears to be mainly harmless. Notice that the variable
+      `buffer-file-coding-system' may determine the format that files are saved
+      in.</p></dd>
+    
+      <dt>X-Symbol doesn't seem to work. What can I do?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>The most common reason why X-Symbol doesn't work is: it's not
+          switched on yet. Assuming you are using ProofGeneral and have installed
+          the X-Symbol package, you still need to turn X-Symbol on in ProofGeneral:
+          select the menu items <tt>Proof-General -&gt; Options -&gt; X-Symbol</tt>
+          and (if you want to save the setting for future sessions) select
+          <tt>Options -&gt; Save Options</tt> in XEmacs.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>How do I input those X-Symbols anyway?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>There are lots of ways to input x-symbols. The one that always works
+          is writing it out in plain text (e.g. for the 'and' symbol type
+          <tt>\&lt;and&gt;</tt>). For common symbols you can try to "paint them in
+          ASCII" and if the xsymbol package recognizes them it will automatically
+          convert them into their graphical representation. Examples:
+          <tt>--&gt;</tt> is converted into the long single arrow, <tt>/\</tt> is
+          converted into the 'and' symbol, the sequence <tt>=_</tt> into the
+          equivalence sign, <tt>&lt;_</tt> into less-or-equal, <tt>[|</tt> into
+          opening semantic brackets, and so on. For greek characters, the
+          <code>rotate</code> command works well: to input &alpha; type
+          <code>a</code> and then <code>C-.</code> (control and <code>.</code>).
+          You can also display the grid-of-characters in the x-symbol menu to get
+          an overview of the available graphical representations (not all of them
+          already have a meaning in Isabelle, though).</dd>
+    
+</dl>
+      <h2>System</h2>
+
+    <dl class="faq">
+    
+      <dt>I want to generate one of those flashy LaTeX documents. How?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>You will need to work with the <tt>isatool</tt> command for this (in
+          a Unix shell). The easiest way to get to a document is the following: use
+          <tt>isatool mkdir</tt> to set up a new directory. The command will also
+          create a file called <tt>IsaMakefile</tt> in the current directory. Put
+          your theory file(s) into the new directory and edit the file
+          <tt>ROOT.ML</tt> in there (following the comments) to tell Isabelle which
+          of the theories to load (and in which order). Go back to the parent
+          directory (where the <tt>IsaMakefile</tt> is) and type <tt>isatool
+          make</tt>. Isabelle should then process your theories and tell you where
+          to find the finished document. For more information on generating
+          documents see the Isabelle Tutorial, Chapter 4.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>I have a large formalization with many theories. Must I process all
+          of them all of the time?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>No, you can tell Isabelle to build a so-called heap image. This heap
+          image can contain your preloaded theories. To get one, set up a directory
+          with a <tt>ROOT.ML</tt> file (as for generating a document) and use the
+          command <tt>isatool usedir -b HOL MyImage</tt> in that directory to
+          create an image <tt>MyImage</tt> using the parent logic <tt>HOL</tt>. You
+          should then be able to invoke Isabelle with <tt>Isabelle -l MyImage</tt>
+          and have everything that is loaded in ROOT.ML instantly available.</dd>
+    
+      <dt>Does Isabelle run on Windows?</dt>
+    
+      <dd>After a fashion, yes, but Isabelle is not being developed for
+          Windows. See the <a href="dist/installation_notes_cygwin.html">installation notes</a> for windows.
+          If the approach presented there is not sufficient for your purpose, consider a
+          dualboot Windows/Linux system.</dd>
+
+    </dl>
+
+    </div>
+    <div class="hr"><hr/></div>
+    <?include file="//include/footer.include.html"?>
+</body>
+
+</html>