doc-src/TutorialI/Recdef/document/Induction.tex
changeset 9698 f0740137a65d
parent 9689 751fde5307e4
child 9719 c753196599f9
--- a/doc-src/TutorialI/Recdef/document/Induction.tex	Mon Aug 28 14:09:33 2000 +0200
+++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/Recdef/document/Induction.tex	Mon Aug 28 15:13:55 2000 +0200
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 \end{isabellepar}%
 The rest is pure simplification:%
 \end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isacommand{by}\ simp\_all%
+\isacommand{by}\ simp{\isacharunderscore}all%
 \begin{isamarkuptext}%
 Try proving the above lemma by structural induction, and you find that you
 need an additional case distinction. What is worse, the names of variables