Modified datatype com.
Added (part of) relative completeness proof for Hoare logic.
(* Title: FOLP/ex/quant.ML
ID: $Id$
Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
Copyright 1991 University of Cambridge
First-Order Logic: quantifier examples (intuitionistic and classical)
Needs declarations of the theory "thy" and the tactic "tac"
*)
writeln"File FOLP/ex/quant.ML";
goal thy "?p : (ALL x y.P(x,y)) --> (ALL y x.P(x,y))";
by tac;
result();
goal thy "?p : (EX x y.P(x,y)) --> (EX y x.P(x,y))";
by tac;
result();
(*Converse is false*)
goal thy "?p : (ALL x.P(x)) | (ALL x.Q(x)) --> (ALL x. P(x) | Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
goal thy "?p : (ALL x. P-->Q(x)) <-> (P--> (ALL x.Q(x)))";
by tac;
result();
goal thy "?p : (ALL x.P(x)-->Q) <-> ((EX x.P(x)) --> Q)";
by tac;
result();
writeln"Some harder ones";
goal thy "?p : (EX x. P(x) | Q(x)) <-> (EX x.P(x)) | (EX x.Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
(*6 secs*)
(*Converse is false*)
goal thy "?p : (EX x. P(x)&Q(x)) --> (EX x.P(x)) & (EX x.Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
writeln"Basic test of quantifier reasoning";
(*TRUE*)
goal thy "?p : (EX y. ALL x. Q(x,y)) --> (ALL x. EX y. Q(x,y))";
by tac;
result();
goal thy "?p : (ALL x. Q(x)) --> (EX x. Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
writeln"The following should fail, as they are false!";
goal thy "?p : (ALL x. EX y. Q(x,y)) --> (EX y. ALL x. Q(x,y))";
by tac handle ERROR => writeln"Failed, as expected";
(*Check that subgoals remain: proof failed.*)
getgoal 1;
goal thy "?p : (EX x. Q(x)) --> (ALL x. Q(x))";
by tac handle ERROR => writeln"Failed, as expected";
getgoal 1;
goal thy "?p : P(?a) --> (ALL x.P(x))";
by tac handle ERROR => writeln"Failed, as expected";
(*Check that subgoals remain: proof failed.*)
getgoal 1;
goal thy
"?p : (P(?a) --> (ALL x.Q(x))) --> (ALL x. P(x) --> Q(x))";
by tac handle ERROR => writeln"Failed, as expected";
getgoal 1;
writeln"Back to things that are provable...";
goal thy "?p : (ALL x.P(x)-->Q(x)) & (EX x.P(x)) --> (EX x.Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
(*An example of why exI should be delayed as long as possible*)
goal thy "?p : (P --> (EX x.Q(x))) & P --> (EX x.Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
goal thy "?p : (ALL x. P(x)-->Q(f(x))) & (ALL x. Q(x)-->R(g(x))) & P(d) --> R(?a)";
by tac;
(*Verify that no subgoals remain.*)
uresult();
goal thy "?p : (ALL x. Q(x)) --> (EX x. Q(x))";
by tac;
result();
writeln"Some slow ones";
(*Principia Mathematica *11.53 *)
goal thy "?p : (ALL x y. P(x) --> Q(y)) <-> ((EX x. P(x)) --> (ALL y. Q(y)))";
by tac;
result();
(*6 secs*)
(*Principia Mathematica *11.55 *)
goal thy "?p : (EX x y. P(x) & Q(x,y)) <-> (EX x. P(x) & (EX y. Q(x,y)))";
by tac;
result();
(*9 secs*)
(*Principia Mathematica *11.61 *)
goal thy "?p : (EX y. ALL x. P(x) --> Q(x,y)) --> (ALL x. P(x) --> (EX y. Q(x,y)))";
by tac;
result();
(*3 secs*)
writeln"Reached end of file.";