(* Title: HOL/Lifting.thy
Author: Brian Huffman and Ondrej Kuncar
Author: Cezary Kaliszyk and Christian Urban
*)
header {* Lifting package *}
theory Lifting
imports Plain Equiv_Relations Transfer
keywords
"print_quotmaps" "print_quotients" :: diag and
"lift_definition" :: thy_goal and
"setup_lifting" :: thy_decl
uses
("Tools/Lifting/lifting_info.ML")
("Tools/Lifting/lifting_term.ML")
("Tools/Lifting/lifting_def.ML")
("Tools/Lifting/lifting_setup.ML")
begin
subsection {* Function map *}
notation map_fun (infixr "--->" 55)
lemma map_fun_id:
"(id ---> id) = id"
by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
subsection {* Quotient Predicate *}
definition
"Quotient R Abs Rep T \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>a. Abs (Rep a) = a) \<and>
(\<forall>a. R (Rep a) (Rep a)) \<and>
(\<forall>r s. R r s \<longleftrightarrow> R r r \<and> R s s \<and> Abs r = Abs s) \<and>
T = (\<lambda>x y. R x x \<and> Abs x = y)"
lemma QuotientI:
assumes "\<And>a. Abs (Rep a) = a"
and "\<And>a. R (Rep a) (Rep a)"
and "\<And>r s. R r s \<longleftrightarrow> R r r \<and> R s s \<and> Abs r = Abs s"
and "T = (\<lambda>x y. R x x \<and> Abs x = y)"
shows "Quotient R Abs Rep T"
using assms unfolding Quotient_def by blast
context
fixes R Abs Rep T
assumes a: "Quotient R Abs Rep T"
begin
lemma Quotient_abs_rep: "Abs (Rep a) = a"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by simp
lemma Quotient_rep_reflp: "R (Rep a) (Rep a)"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by blast
lemma Quotient_rel:
"R r r \<and> R s s \<and> Abs r = Abs s \<longleftrightarrow> R r s" -- {* orientation does not loop on rewriting *}
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by blast
lemma Quotient_cr_rel: "T = (\<lambda>x y. R x x \<and> Abs x = y)"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by blast
lemma Quotient_refl1: "R r s \<Longrightarrow> R r r"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by fast
lemma Quotient_refl2: "R r s \<Longrightarrow> R s s"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by fast
lemma Quotient_rel_rep: "R (Rep a) (Rep b) \<longleftrightarrow> a = b"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by metis
lemma Quotient_rep_abs: "R r r \<Longrightarrow> R (Rep (Abs r)) r"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by blast
lemma Quotient_rel_abs: "R r s \<Longrightarrow> Abs r = Abs s"
using a unfolding Quotient_def
by blast
lemma Quotient_symp: "symp R"
using a unfolding Quotient_def using sympI by (metis (full_types))
lemma Quotient_transp: "transp R"
using a unfolding Quotient_def using transpI by (metis (full_types))
lemma Quotient_part_equivp: "part_equivp R"
by (metis Quotient_rep_reflp Quotient_symp Quotient_transp part_equivpI)
end
lemma identity_quotient: "Quotient (op =) id id (op =)"
unfolding Quotient_def by simp
lemma Quotient_alt_def:
"Quotient R Abs Rep T \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>a b. T a b \<longrightarrow> Abs a = b) \<and>
(\<forall>b. T (Rep b) b) \<and>
(\<forall>x y. R x y \<longleftrightarrow> T x (Abs x) \<and> T y (Abs y) \<and> Abs x = Abs y)"
apply safe
apply (simp (no_asm_use) only: Quotient_def, fast)
apply (simp (no_asm_use) only: Quotient_def, fast)
apply (simp (no_asm_use) only: Quotient_def, fast)
apply (simp (no_asm_use) only: Quotient_def, fast)
apply (simp (no_asm_use) only: Quotient_def, fast)
apply (simp (no_asm_use) only: Quotient_def, fast)
apply (rule QuotientI)
apply simp
apply metis
apply simp
apply (rule ext, rule ext, metis)
done
lemma Quotient_alt_def2:
"Quotient R Abs Rep T \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>a b. T a b \<longrightarrow> Abs a = b) \<and>
(\<forall>b. T (Rep b) b) \<and>
(\<forall>x y. R x y \<longleftrightarrow> T x (Abs y) \<and> T y (Abs x))"
unfolding Quotient_alt_def by (safe, metis+)
lemma fun_quotient:
assumes 1: "Quotient R1 abs1 rep1 T1"
assumes 2: "Quotient R2 abs2 rep2 T2"
shows "Quotient (R1 ===> R2) (rep1 ---> abs2) (abs1 ---> rep2) (T1 ===> T2)"
using assms unfolding Quotient_alt_def2
unfolding fun_rel_def fun_eq_iff map_fun_apply
by (safe, metis+)
lemma apply_rsp:
fixes f g::"'a \<Rightarrow> 'c"
assumes q: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1 T1"
and a: "(R1 ===> R2) f g" "R1 x y"
shows "R2 (f x) (g y)"
using a by (auto elim: fun_relE)
lemma apply_rsp':
assumes a: "(R1 ===> R2) f g" "R1 x y"
shows "R2 (f x) (g y)"
using a by (auto elim: fun_relE)
lemma apply_rsp'':
assumes "Quotient R Abs Rep T"
and "(R ===> S) f f"
shows "S (f (Rep x)) (f (Rep x))"
proof -
from assms(1) have "R (Rep x) (Rep x)" by (rule Quotient_rep_reflp)
then show ?thesis using assms(2) by (auto intro: apply_rsp')
qed
subsection {* Quotient composition *}
lemma Quotient_compose:
assumes 1: "Quotient R1 Abs1 Rep1 T1"
assumes 2: "Quotient R2 Abs2 Rep2 T2"
shows "Quotient (T1 OO R2 OO conversep T1) (Abs2 \<circ> Abs1) (Rep1 \<circ> Rep2) (T1 OO T2)"
proof -
from 1 have Abs1: "\<And>a b. T1 a b \<Longrightarrow> Abs1 a = b"
unfolding Quotient_alt_def by simp
from 1 have Rep1: "\<And>b. T1 (Rep1 b) b"
unfolding Quotient_alt_def by simp
from 2 have Abs2: "\<And>a b. T2 a b \<Longrightarrow> Abs2 a = b"
unfolding Quotient_alt_def by simp
from 2 have Rep2: "\<And>b. T2 (Rep2 b) b"
unfolding Quotient_alt_def by simp
from 2 have R2:
"\<And>x y. R2 x y \<longleftrightarrow> T2 x (Abs2 x) \<and> T2 y (Abs2 y) \<and> Abs2 x = Abs2 y"
unfolding Quotient_alt_def by simp
show ?thesis
unfolding Quotient_alt_def
apply simp
apply safe
apply (drule Abs1, simp)
apply (erule Abs2)
apply (rule relcomppI)
apply (rule Rep1)
apply (rule Rep2)
apply (rule relcomppI, assumption)
apply (drule Abs1, simp)
apply (clarsimp simp add: R2)
apply (rule relcomppI, assumption)
apply (drule Abs1, simp)+
apply (clarsimp simp add: R2)
apply (drule Abs1, simp)+
apply (clarsimp simp add: R2)
apply (rule relcomppI, assumption)
apply (rule relcomppI [rotated])
apply (erule conversepI)
apply (drule Abs1, simp)+
apply (simp add: R2)
done
qed
lemma equivp_reflp2:
"equivp R \<Longrightarrow> reflp R"
by (erule equivpE)
subsection {* Invariant *}
definition invariant :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
where "invariant R = (\<lambda>x y. R x \<and> x = y)"
lemma invariant_to_eq:
assumes "invariant P x y"
shows "x = y"
using assms by (simp add: invariant_def)
lemma fun_rel_eq_invariant:
shows "((invariant R) ===> S) = (\<lambda>f g. \<forall>x. R x \<longrightarrow> S (f x) (g x))"
by (auto simp add: invariant_def fun_rel_def)
lemma invariant_same_args:
shows "invariant P x x \<equiv> P x"
using assms by (auto simp add: invariant_def)
lemma UNIV_typedef_to_Quotient:
assumes "type_definition Rep Abs UNIV"
and T_def: "T \<equiv> (\<lambda>x y. x = Rep y)"
shows "Quotient (op =) Abs Rep T"
proof -
interpret type_definition Rep Abs UNIV by fact
from Abs_inject Rep_inverse Abs_inverse T_def show ?thesis
by (fastforce intro!: QuotientI fun_eq_iff)
qed
lemma UNIV_typedef_to_equivp:
fixes Abs :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b"
and Rep :: "'b \<Rightarrow> 'a"
assumes "type_definition Rep Abs (UNIV::'a set)"
shows "equivp (op=::'a\<Rightarrow>'a\<Rightarrow>bool)"
by (rule identity_equivp)
lemma typedef_to_Quotient:
assumes "type_definition Rep Abs S"
and T_def: "T \<equiv> (\<lambda>x y. x = Rep y)"
shows "Quotient (invariant (\<lambda>x. x \<in> S)) Abs Rep T"
proof -
interpret type_definition Rep Abs S by fact
from Rep Abs_inject Rep_inverse Abs_inverse T_def show ?thesis
by (auto intro!: QuotientI simp: invariant_def fun_eq_iff)
qed
lemma typedef_to_part_equivp:
assumes "type_definition Rep Abs S"
shows "part_equivp (invariant (\<lambda>x. x \<in> S))"
proof (intro part_equivpI)
interpret type_definition Rep Abs S by fact
show "\<exists>x. invariant (\<lambda>x. x \<in> S) x x" using Rep by (auto simp: invariant_def)
next
show "symp (invariant (\<lambda>x. x \<in> S))" by (auto intro: sympI simp: invariant_def)
next
show "transp (invariant (\<lambda>x. x \<in> S))" by (auto intro: transpI simp: invariant_def)
qed
lemma open_typedef_to_Quotient:
assumes "type_definition Rep Abs {x. P x}"
and T_def: "T \<equiv> (\<lambda>x y. x = Rep y)"
shows "Quotient (invariant P) Abs Rep T"
proof -
interpret type_definition Rep Abs "{x. P x}" by fact
from Rep Abs_inject Rep_inverse Abs_inverse T_def show ?thesis
by (auto intro!: QuotientI simp: invariant_def fun_eq_iff)
qed
lemma open_typedef_to_part_equivp:
assumes "type_definition Rep Abs {x. P x}"
shows "part_equivp (invariant P)"
proof (intro part_equivpI)
interpret type_definition Rep Abs "{x. P x}" by fact
show "\<exists>x. invariant P x x" using Rep by (auto simp: invariant_def)
next
show "symp (invariant P)" by (auto intro: sympI simp: invariant_def)
next
show "transp (invariant P)" by (auto intro: transpI simp: invariant_def)
qed
text {* Generating transfer rules for quotients. *}
context
fixes R Abs Rep T
assumes 1: "Quotient R Abs Rep T"
begin
lemma Quotient_right_unique: "right_unique T"
using 1 unfolding Quotient_alt_def right_unique_def by metis
lemma Quotient_right_total: "right_total T"
using 1 unfolding Quotient_alt_def right_total_def by metis
lemma Quotient_rel_eq_transfer: "(T ===> T ===> op =) R (op =)"
using 1 unfolding Quotient_alt_def fun_rel_def by simp
lemma Quotient_abs_induct:
assumes "\<And>y. R y y \<Longrightarrow> P (Abs y)" shows "P x"
using 1 assms unfolding Quotient_def by metis
end
text {* Generating transfer rules for total quotients. *}
context
fixes R Abs Rep T
assumes 1: "Quotient R Abs Rep T" and 2: "reflp R"
begin
lemma Quotient_bi_total: "bi_total T"
using 1 2 unfolding Quotient_alt_def bi_total_def reflp_def by auto
lemma Quotient_id_abs_transfer: "(op = ===> T) (\<lambda>x. x) Abs"
using 1 2 unfolding Quotient_alt_def reflp_def fun_rel_def by simp
end
text {* Generating transfer rules for a type defined with @{text "typedef"}. *}
context
fixes Rep Abs A T
assumes type: "type_definition Rep Abs A"
assumes T_def: "T \<equiv> (\<lambda>(x::'a) (y::'b). x = Rep y)"
begin
lemma typedef_bi_unique: "bi_unique T"
unfolding bi_unique_def T_def
by (simp add: type_definition.Rep_inject [OF type])
lemma typedef_right_total: "right_total T"
unfolding right_total_def T_def by simp
lemma typedef_rep_transfer: "(T ===> op =) (\<lambda>x. x) Rep"
unfolding fun_rel_def T_def by simp
lemma typedef_transfer_All: "((T ===> op =) ===> op =) (Ball A) All"
unfolding T_def fun_rel_def
by (metis type_definition.Rep [OF type]
type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type])
lemma typedef_transfer_Ex: "((T ===> op =) ===> op =) (Bex A) Ex"
unfolding T_def fun_rel_def
by (metis type_definition.Rep [OF type]
type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type])
lemma typedef_transfer_bforall:
"((T ===> op =) ===> op =)
(transfer_bforall (\<lambda>x. x \<in> A)) transfer_forall"
unfolding transfer_bforall_def transfer_forall_def Ball_def [symmetric]
by (rule typedef_transfer_All)
end
text {* Generating transfer rules for a type copy. *}
lemma copy_type_bi_total:
assumes type: "type_definition Rep Abs UNIV"
assumes T_def: "T \<equiv> (\<lambda>x y. x = Rep y)"
shows "bi_total T"
unfolding bi_total_def T_def
by (metis type_definition.Abs_inverse [OF type] UNIV_I)
text {* Generating the correspondence rule for a constant defined with
@{text "lift_definition"}. *}
lemma Quotient_to_transfer:
assumes "Quotient R Abs Rep T" and "R c c" and "c' \<equiv> Abs c"
shows "T c c'"
using assms by (auto dest: Quotient_cr_rel)
subsection {* ML setup *}
text {* Auxiliary data for the lifting package *}
use "Tools/Lifting/lifting_info.ML"
setup Lifting_Info.setup
declare [[map "fun" = (fun_rel, fun_quotient)]]
use "Tools/Lifting/lifting_term.ML"
use "Tools/Lifting/lifting_def.ML"
use "Tools/Lifting/lifting_setup.ML"
hide_const (open) invariant
end