(* Title: HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML
Author: David von Oheimb (based on a lecture on Lambda Prolog by Nadathur)
*)
set Proof.show_main_goal;
structure Prolog =
struct
exception not_HOHH;
fun isD t = case t of
Const("Trueprop",_)$t => isD t
| Const("op &" ,_)$l$r => isD l andalso isD r
| Const("op -->",_)$l$r => isG l andalso isD r
| Const( "==>",_)$l$r => isG l andalso isD r
| Const("All",_)$Abs(s,_,t) => isD t
| Const("all",_)$Abs(s,_,t) => isD t
| Const("op |",_)$_$_ => false
| Const("Ex" ,_)$_ => false
| Const("not",_)$_ => false
| Const("True",_) => false
| Const("False",_) => false
| l $ r => isD l
| Const _ (* rigid atom *) => true
| Bound _ (* rigid atom *) => true
| Free _ (* rigid atom *) => true
| _ (* flexible atom,
anything else *) => false
and
isG t = case t of
Const("Trueprop",_)$t => isG t
| Const("op &" ,_)$l$r => isG l andalso isG r
| Const("op |" ,_)$l$r => isG l andalso isG r
| Const("op -->",_)$l$r => isD l andalso isG r
| Const( "==>",_)$l$r => isD l andalso isG r
| Const("All",_)$Abs(_,_,t) => isG t
| Const("all",_)$Abs(_,_,t) => isG t
| Const("Ex" ,_)$Abs(_,_,t) => isG t
| Const("True",_) => true
| Const("not",_)$_ => false
| Const("False",_) => false
| _ (* atom *) => true;
val check_HOHH_tac1 = PRIMITIVE (fn thm =>
if isG (concl_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
val check_HOHH_tac2 = PRIMITIVE (fn thm =>
if forall isG (prems_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
fun check_HOHH thm = (if isD (concl_of thm) andalso forall isG (prems_of thm)
then thm else raise not_HOHH);
fun atomizeD ctxt thm = let
fun at thm = case concl_of thm of
_$(Const("All" ,_)$Abs(s,_,_))=> at(thm RS
(read_instantiate ctxt [(("x", 0), "?" ^ (if s="P" then "PP" else s))] spec))
| _$(Const("op &",_)$_$_) => at(thm RS conjunct1)@at(thm RS conjunct2)
| _$(Const("op -->",_)$_$_) => at(thm RS mp)
| _ => [thm]
in map zero_var_indexes (at thm) end;
val atomize_ss =
Simplifier.theory_context @{theory} empty_ss
setmksimps (mksimps mksimps_pairs)
addsimps [
all_conj_distrib, (* "(! x. P x & Q x) = ((! x. P x) & (! x. Q x))" *)
imp_conjL RS sym, (* "(D :- G1 :- G2) = (D :- G1 & G2)" *)
imp_conjR, (* "(D1 & D2 :- G) = ((D1 :- G) & (D2 :- G))" *)
imp_all]; (* "((!x. D) :- G) = (!x. D :- G)" *)
(*val hyp_resolve_tac = Subgoal.FOCUS_PREMS (fn {prems, ...} =>
resolve_tac (maps atomizeD prems) 1);
-- is nice, but cannot instantiate unknowns in the assumptions *)
fun hyp_resolve_tac i st = let
fun ap (Const("All",_)$Abs(_,_,t))=(case ap t of (k,a,t) => (k+1,a ,t))
| ap (Const("op -->",_)$_$t) =(case ap t of (k,_,t) => (k,true ,t))
| ap t = (0,false,t);
(*
fun rep_goal (Const ("all",_)$Abs (_,_,t)) = rep_goal t
| rep_goal (Const ("==>",_)$s$t) =
(case rep_goal t of (l,t) => (s::l,t))
| rep_goal t = ([] ,t);
val (prems, Const("Trueprop", _)$concl) = rep_goal
(#3(dest_state (st,i)));
*)
val subgoal = #3(dest_state (st,i));
val prems = Logic.strip_assums_hyp subgoal;
val concl = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl subgoal);
fun drot_tac k i = DETERM (rotate_tac k i);
fun spec_tac 0 i = all_tac
| spec_tac k i = EVERY' [dtac spec, drot_tac ~1, spec_tac (k-1)] i;
fun dup_spec_tac k i = if k = 0 then all_tac else EVERY'
[DETERM o (etac all_dupE), drot_tac ~2, spec_tac (k-1)] i;
fun same_head _ (Const (x,_)) (Const (y,_)) = x = y
| same_head k (s$_) (t$_) = same_head k s t
| same_head k (Bound i) (Bound j) = i = j + k
| same_head _ _ _ = true;
fun mapn f n [] = []
| mapn f n (x::xs) = f n x::mapn f (n+1) xs;
fun pres_tac (k,arrow,t) n i = drot_tac n i THEN (
if same_head k t concl
then dup_spec_tac k i THEN
(if arrow then etac mp i THEN drot_tac (~n) i else atac i)
else no_tac);
val ptacs = mapn (fn n => fn t =>
pres_tac (ap (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop t)) n i) 0 prems;
in Library.foldl (op APPEND) (no_tac, ptacs) st end;
fun ptac ctxt prog = let
val proga = List.concat (map (atomizeD ctxt) prog) (* atomize the prog *)
in (REPEAT_DETERM1 o FIRST' [
rtac TrueI, (* "True" *)
rtac conjI, (* "[| P; Q |] ==> P & Q" *)
rtac allI, (* "(!!x. P x) ==> ! x. P x" *)
rtac exI, (* "P x ==> ? x. P x" *)
rtac impI THEN' (* "(P ==> Q) ==> P --> Q" *)
asm_full_simp_tac atomize_ss THEN' (* atomize the asms *)
(REPEAT_DETERM o (etac conjE)) (* split the asms *)
])
ORELSE' resolve_tac [disjI1,disjI2] (* "P ==> P | Q","Q ==> P | Q"*)
ORELSE' ((resolve_tac proga APPEND' hyp_resolve_tac)
THEN' (fn _ => check_HOHH_tac2))
end;
fun prolog_tac ctxt prog =
check_HOHH_tac1 THEN
DEPTH_SOLVE (ptac ctxt (map check_HOHH prog) 1);
val prog_HOHH = [];
end;