(* $Id$ *)
theory Class
imports "../Nominal"
begin
section {* Term-Calculus from Urban's PhD *}
atom_decl name coname
text {* types *}
nominal_datatype ty =
PR "string"
| NOT "ty"
| AND "ty" "ty" ("_ AND _" [100,100] 100)
| OR "ty" "ty" ("_ OR _" [100,100] 100)
| IMP "ty" "ty" ("_ IMP _" [100,100] 100)
instance ty :: size ..
nominal_primrec
"size (PR s) = (1::nat)"
"size (NOT T) = 1 + size T"
"size (T1 AND T2) = 1 + size T1 + size T2"
"size (T1 OR T2) = 1 + size T1 + size T2"
"size (T1 IMP T2) = 1 + size T1 + size T2"
by (rule TrueI)+
lemma ty_cases:
fixes T::ty
shows "(\<exists>s. T=PR s) \<or> (\<exists>T'. T=NOT T') \<or> (\<exists>S U. T=S OR U) \<or> (\<exists>S U. T=S AND U) \<or> (\<exists>S U. T=S IMP U)"
by (induct T rule:ty.weak_induct) (auto)
lemma fresh_ty:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
and T::"ty"
shows "a\<sharp>T" and "x\<sharp>T"
by (nominal_induct T rule: ty.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_string)
text {* terms *}
nominal_datatype trm =
Ax "name" "coname"
| Cut "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" ("Cut <_>._ (_)._" [100,100,100,100] 100)
| NotR "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" "coname" ("NotR (_)._ _" [100,100,100] 100)
| NotL "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "name" ("NotL <_>._ _" [100,100,100] 100)
| AndR "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "coname" ("AndR <_>._ <_>._ _" [100,100,100,100,100] 100)
| AndL1 "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" "name" ("AndL1 (_)._ _" [100,100,100] 100)
| AndL2 "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" "name" ("AndL2 (_)._ _" [100,100,100] 100)
| OrR1 "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "coname" ("OrR1 <_>._ _" [100,100,100] 100)
| OrR2 "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "coname" ("OrR2 <_>._ _" [100,100,100] 100)
| OrL "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" "name" ("OrL (_)._ (_)._ _" [100,100,100,100,100] 100)
| ImpR "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>(\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm)" "coname" ("ImpR (_).<_>._ _" [100,100,100,100] 100)
| ImpL "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" "name" ("ImpL <_>._ (_)._ _" [100,100,100,100,100] 100)
text {* named terms *}
nominal_datatype ntrm = Na "\<guillemotleft>name\<guillemotright>trm" ("((_):_)" [100,100] 100)
text {* conamed terms *}
nominal_datatype ctrm = Co "\<guillemotleft>coname\<guillemotright>trm" ("(<_>:_)" [100,100] 100)
text {* renaming functions *}
consts
nrename :: "trm \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> trm" ("_[_\<turnstile>n>_]" [100,100,100] 100)
crename :: "trm \<Rightarrow> coname \<Rightarrow> coname \<Rightarrow> trm" ("_[_\<turnstile>c>_]" [100,100,100] 100)
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "(d::coname,e::coname)")
"(Ax x a)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = (if a=d then Ax x e else Ax x a)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(d,e,N);x\<sharp>M\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Cut <a>.M (x).N)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = Cut <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) (x).(N[d\<turnstile>c>e])"
"(NotR (x).M a)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = (if a=d then NotR (x).(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) e else NotR (x).(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) a)"
"a\<sharp>(d,e) \<Longrightarrow> (NotL <a>.M x)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = (NotL <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) x)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(d,e,N,c);b\<sharp>(d,e,M,c);b\<noteq>a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c)[d\<turnstile>c>e] =
(if c=d then AndR <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) <b>.(N[d \<turnstile>c>e]) e else AndR <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) <b>.(N[d\<turnstile>c>e]) c)"
"x\<sharp>y \<Longrightarrow> (AndL1 (x).M y)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = AndL1 (x).(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) y"
"x\<sharp>y \<Longrightarrow> (AndL2 (x).M y)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = AndL2 (x).(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) y"
"a\<sharp>(d,e,b) \<Longrightarrow> (OrR1 <a>.M b)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = (if b=d then OrR1 <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) e else OrR1 <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) b)"
"a\<sharp>(d,e,b) \<Longrightarrow> (OrR2 <a>.M b)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = (if b=d then OrR2 <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) e else OrR2 <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) b)"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z);y\<sharp>(M,z);y\<noteq>x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (OrL (x).M (y).N z)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = OrL (x).(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) (y).(N[d\<turnstile>c>e]) z"
"a\<sharp>(d,e,b) \<Longrightarrow> (ImpR (x).<a>.M b)[d\<turnstile>c>e] =
(if b=d then ImpR (x).<a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) e else ImpR (x).<a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) b)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(d,e,N);x\<sharp>(M,y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpL <a>.M (x).N y)[d\<turnstile>c>e] = ImpL <a>.(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) (x).(N[d\<turnstile>c>e]) y"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)+
apply(fresh_guess)+
done
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "(u::name,v::name)")
"(Ax x a)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = (if x=u then Ax v a else Ax x a)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>N;x\<sharp>(u,v,M)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Cut <a>.M (x).N)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = Cut <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v])"
"x\<sharp>(u,v) \<Longrightarrow> (NotR (x).M a)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = NotR (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) a"
"(NotL <a>.M x)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = (if x=u then NotL <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) v else NotL <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) x)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,c);b\<sharp>(M,c);b\<noteq>a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = AndR <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) <b>.(N[u\<turnstile>n>v]) c"
"x\<sharp>(u,v,y) \<Longrightarrow> (AndL1 (x).M y)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = (if y=u then AndL1 (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) v else AndL1 (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) y)"
"x\<sharp>(u,v,y) \<Longrightarrow> (AndL2 (x).M y)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = (if y=u then AndL2 (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) v else AndL2 (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) y)"
"a\<sharp>b \<Longrightarrow> (OrR1 <a>.M b)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = OrR1 <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) b"
"a\<sharp>b \<Longrightarrow> (OrR2 <a>.M b)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = OrR2 <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) b"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(u,v,N,z);y\<sharp>(u,v,M,z);y\<noteq>x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (OrL (x).M (y).N z)[u\<turnstile>n>v] =
(if z=u then OrL (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (y).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v]) v else OrL (x).(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (y).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v]) z)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>b; x\<sharp>(u,v)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpR (x).<a>.M b)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = ImpR (x).<a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) b"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>N;x\<sharp>(u,v,M,y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpL <a>.M (x).N y)[u\<turnstile>n>v] =
(if y=u then ImpL <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v]) v else ImpL <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v]) y)"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fs_name1 fs_coname1)+
apply(fresh_guess)+
done
lemmas eq_bij = pt_bij[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst] pt_bij[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst]
lemma crename_name_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "pi\<bullet>(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) = (pi\<bullet>M)[(pi\<bullet>d)\<turnstile>c>(pi\<bullet>e)]"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: d e rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_bij eq_bij)
done
lemma crename_coname_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "pi\<bullet>(M[d\<turnstile>c>e]) = (pi\<bullet>M)[(pi\<bullet>d)\<turnstile>c>(pi\<bullet>e)]"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: d e rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_bij eq_bij)
done
lemma nrename_name_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "pi\<bullet>(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) = (pi\<bullet>M)[(pi\<bullet>x)\<turnstile>n>(pi\<bullet>y)]"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_bij eq_bij)
done
lemma nrename_coname_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "pi\<bullet>(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) = (pi\<bullet>M)[(pi\<bullet>x)\<turnstile>n>(pi\<bullet>y)]"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_bij eq_bij)
done
lemmas rename_eqvts = crename_name_eqvt crename_coname_eqvt
nrename_name_eqvt nrename_coname_eqvt
lemma nrename_fresh:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>M"
shows "M[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M"
using a
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: trm.inject fresh_atm abs_fresh fin_supp abs_supp)
lemma crename_fresh:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>M"
shows "M[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M"
using a
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: a b rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: trm.inject fresh_atm abs_fresh)
lemma nrename_nfresh:
fixes x::"name"
shows "x\<sharp>y\<Longrightarrow>x\<sharp>M[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma crename_nfresh:
fixes x::"name"
shows "x\<sharp>M\<Longrightarrow>x\<sharp>M[a\<turnstile>c>b]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: a b rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma crename_cfresh:
fixes a::"coname"
shows "a\<sharp>b\<Longrightarrow>a\<sharp>M[a\<turnstile>c>b]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: a b rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma nrename_cfresh:
fixes c::"coname"
shows "c\<sharp>M\<Longrightarrow>c\<sharp>M[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma nrename_nfresh':
fixes x::"name"
shows "x\<sharp>(M,z,y)\<Longrightarrow>x\<sharp>M[z\<turnstile>n>y]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: x z y rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma crename_cfresh':
fixes a::"coname"
shows "a\<sharp>(M,b,c)\<Longrightarrow>a\<sharp>M[b\<turnstile>c>c]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: a b c rule: trm.induct)
(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma nrename_rename:
assumes a: "x'\<sharp>M"
shows "([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)[x'\<turnstile>n>y]= M[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x x' y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_bij fresh_atm fresh_prod fresh_right calc_atm abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma crename_rename:
assumes a: "a'\<sharp>M"
shows "([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)[a'\<turnstile>c>b]= M[a\<turnstile>c>b]"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a a' b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_bij fresh_atm fresh_prod fresh_right calc_atm abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemmas rename_fresh = nrename_fresh crename_fresh
nrename_nfresh crename_nfresh crename_cfresh nrename_cfresh
nrename_nfresh' crename_cfresh'
nrename_rename crename_rename
lemma better_nrename_Cut:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(u,v)"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = Cut <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v])"
proof -
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,a,x,u,v)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a,x,u,v)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq1: "(Cut <a>.M (x).N) = (Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N))"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
have "(Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N))[u\<turnstile>n>v] =
Cut <a'>.(([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)[u\<turnstile>n>v])"
using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v])" using fs1 fs2 a
apply -
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod rename_eqvts)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
done
finally show "(Cut <a>.M (x).N)[u\<turnstile>n>v] = Cut <a>.(M[u\<turnstile>n>v]) (x).(N[u\<turnstile>n>v])" using eq1
by simp
qed
lemma better_crename_Cut:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(b,c)"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N)[b\<turnstile>c>c] = Cut <a>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>c]) (x).(N[b\<turnstile>c>c])"
proof -
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,a,x,b,c)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a,x,b,c)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq1: "(Cut <a>.M (x).N) = (Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N))"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
have "(Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N))[b\<turnstile>c>c] =
Cut <a'>.(([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)[b\<turnstile>c>c]) (x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)[b\<turnstile>c>c])"
using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>c]) (x).(N[b\<turnstile>c>c])" using fs1 fs2 a
apply -
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod rename_eqvts)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
done
finally show "(Cut <a>.M (x).N)[b\<turnstile>c>c] = Cut <a>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>c]) (x).(N[b\<turnstile>c>c])" using eq1
by simp
qed
lemma crename_id:
shows "M[a\<turnstile>c>a] = M"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: a rule: trm.induct) (auto)
lemma nrename_id:
shows "M[x\<turnstile>n>x] = M"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: x rule: trm.induct) (auto)
lemma nrename_swap:
shows "x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> [(x,y)]\<bullet>M = M[y\<turnstile>n>x]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
(simp_all add: calc_atm fresh_atm trm.inject alpha abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma crename_swap:
shows "a\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> [(a,b)]\<bullet>M = M[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
by (nominal_induct M avoiding: a b rule: trm.induct)
(simp_all add: calc_atm fresh_atm trm.inject alpha abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
lemma crename_ax:
assumes a: "M[a\<turnstile>c>b] = Ax x c" "c\<noteq>a" "c\<noteq>b"
shows "M = Ax x c"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a b x c rule: trm.induct)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject split: if_splits)
done
lemma nrename_ax:
assumes a: "M[x\<turnstile>n>y] = Ax z a" "z\<noteq>x" "z\<noteq>y"
shows "M = Ax z a"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y z a rule: trm.induct)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject split: if_splits)
done
text {* substitution functions *}
lemma fresh_perm_coname:
fixes c::"coname"
and pi::"coname prm"
and M::"trm"
assumes a: "c\<sharp>pi" "c\<sharp>M"
shows "c\<sharp>(pi\<bullet>M)"
using a
apply -
apply(simp add: fresh_left)
apply(simp add: at_prm_fresh[OF at_coname_inst] fresh_list_rev)
done
lemma fresh_perm_name:
fixes x::"name"
and pi::"name prm"
and M::"trm"
assumes a: "x\<sharp>pi" "x\<sharp>M"
shows "x\<sharp>(pi\<bullet>M)"
using a
apply -
apply(simp add: fresh_left)
apply(simp add: at_prm_fresh[OF at_name_inst] fresh_list_rev)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_NotL:
assumes a: "x'\<sharp>P" "x'\<sharp>M"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x') = Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x'"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_name_inst)
apply(rule at_name_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(c,P,a,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_NotL[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x')=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x'))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x')=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x'))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule fresh_perm_name)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule fresh_perm_name)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp add: at_prm_fresh[OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_AndL1:
assumes a: "z'\<sharp>P" "z'\<sharp>M" "z'\<sharp>x"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z') = Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z'"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_name_inst)
apply(rule at_name_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(c,P,x,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_AndL1[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z')=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z'))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z')=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z'))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,x,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>x,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 at_prm_fresh[OF at_name_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,x,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>x,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_AndL2:
assumes a: "z'\<sharp>P" "z'\<sharp>M" "z'\<sharp>x"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z') = Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z'"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_name_inst)
apply(rule at_name_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(c,P,x,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_AndL2[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z')=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z'))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z')=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z'))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,x,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>x,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 at_prm_fresh[OF at_name_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,x,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>x,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_OrL:
assumes a: "z'\<sharp>P" "z'\<sharp>M" "z'\<sharp>N" "z'\<sharp>u" "z'\<sharp>x"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).M (u).N z') = Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).M (u).N z'"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_name_inst)
apply(rule at_name_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(c,P,x,M,u,N)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_OrL[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).M (u).N z')=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).M (u).N z'))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).M (u).N z')=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).M (u).N z'))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,N,x,u,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>N,pi1\<bullet>x,pi1\<bullet>u,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL at_prm_fresh[OF at_name_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,N,x,u,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>N,pi2\<bullet>x,pi2\<bullet>u,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_ImpL:
assumes a: "z'\<sharp>P" "z'\<sharp>M" "z'\<sharp>N" "z'\<sharp>x"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z') = Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z'"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_name_inst)
apply(rule at_name_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(c,P,x,M,N)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_ImpL[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z')=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z'))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z')=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z'))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,N,x,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>N,pi1\<bullet>x,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL at_prm_fresh[OF at_name_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::name. n\<sharp>(P,M,N,x,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>N,pi2\<bullet>x,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_NotR:
assumes a: "a'\<sharp>P" "a'\<sharp>M"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(NotR (y).M a') (x).P) = Cut <a'>.(NotR (y).M a') (x).P"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_coname_inst)
apply(rule at_coname_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(x,P,y,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_NotR[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(NotR (y).M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(NotR (y).M a') (x).P))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(NotR (y).M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(NotR (y).M a') (x).P))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR at_prm_fresh[OF at_coname_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_AndR:
assumes a: "a'\<sharp>P" "a'\<sharp>M" "a'\<sharp>N" "a'\<sharp>b" "a'\<sharp>c"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <b>.M <c>.N a') (x).P) = Cut <a'>.(AndR <b>.M <c>.N a') (x).P"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_coname_inst)
apply(rule at_coname_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(x,P,b,M,c,N)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_AndR[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <b>.M <c>.N a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <b>.M <c>.N a') (x).P))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <b>.M <c>.N a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <b>.M <c>.N a') (x).P))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,N,b,c,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>N,pi1\<bullet>b,pi1\<bullet>c,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,N,b,c,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>N,pi2\<bullet>b,pi2\<bullet>c,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR at_prm_fresh[OF at_coname_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_OrR1:
assumes a: "a'\<sharp>P" "a'\<sharp>M" "a'\<sharp>b"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR1 <b>.M a') (x).P) = Cut <a'>.(OrR1 <b>.M a') (x).P"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_coname_inst)
apply(rule at_coname_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(x,P,b,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_OrR1[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR1 <b>.M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR1 <b>.M a') (x).P))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR1 <b>.M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR1 <b>.M a') (x).P))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,b,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>b,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,b,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>b,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 at_prm_fresh[OF at_coname_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_OrR2:
assumes a: "a'\<sharp>P" "a'\<sharp>M" "a'\<sharp>b"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR2 <b>.M a') (x).P) = Cut <a'>.(OrR2 <b>.M a') (x).P"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_coname_inst)
apply(rule at_coname_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(x,P,b,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_OrR2[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR2 <b>.M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR2 <b>.M a') (x).P))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR2 <b>.M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(OrR2 <b>.M a') (x).P))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,b,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>b,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,b,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>b,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 at_prm_fresh[OF at_coname_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
lemma fresh_fun_simp_ImpR:
assumes a: "a'\<sharp>P" "a'\<sharp>M" "a'\<sharp>b"
shows "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(ImpR (y).<b>.M a') (x).P) = Cut <a'>.(ImpR (y).<b>.M a') (x).P"
using a
apply -
apply(rule fresh_fun_app)
apply(rule pt_coname_inst)
apply(rule at_coname_inst)
apply(finite_guess)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(x,P,y,b,M)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(rule_tac x="n" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_guess)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)
done
lemma fresh_fun_ImpR[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(ImpR (y).<b>.M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi1\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(ImpR (y).<b>.M a') (x).P))"
and "pi2\<bullet>fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(ImpR (y).<b>.M a') (x).P)=
fresh_fun (pi2\<bullet>(\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(ImpR (y).<b>.M a') (x).P))"
apply -
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,b,pi1\<bullet>P,pi1\<bullet>M,pi1\<bullet>b,pi1)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>n::coname. n\<sharp>(P,M,b,pi2\<bullet>P,pi2\<bullet>M,pi2\<bullet>b,pi2)")
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR at_prm_fresh[OF at_coname_inst])
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(simp add: fin_supp)
done
consts
substn :: "trm \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> coname \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> trm" ("_{_:=<_>._}" [100,100,100,100] 100)
substc :: "trm \<Rightarrow> coname \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> trm" ("_{_:=(_)._}" [100,100,100,100] 100)
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "(y::name,c::coname,P::trm)")
"(Ax x a){y:=<c>.P} = (if x=y then Cut <c>.P (y).Ax y a else Ax x a)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(c,P,N);x\<sharp>(y,P,M)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Cut <a>.M (x).N){y:=<c>.P} =
(if M=Ax y a then Cut <c>.P (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}) else Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}))"
"x\<sharp>(y,P) \<Longrightarrow> (NotR (x).M a){y:=<c>.P} = NotR (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) a"
"a\<sharp>(c,P) \<Longrightarrow> (NotL <a>.M x){y:=<c>.P} =
(if x=y then fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) x') else NotL <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) x)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(c,P,N,d);b\<sharp>(c,P,M,d);b\<noteq>a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
(AndR <a>.M <b>.N d){y:=<c>.P} = AndR <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) <b>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) d"
"x\<sharp>(y,P,z) \<Longrightarrow> (AndL1 (x).M z){y:=<c>.P} =
(if z=y then fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) z')
else AndL1 (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) z)"
"x\<sharp>(y,P,z) \<Longrightarrow> (AndL2 (x).M z){y:=<c>.P} =
(if z=y then fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) z')
else AndL2 (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) z)"
"a\<sharp>(c,P,b) \<Longrightarrow> (OrR1 <a>.M b){y:=<c>.P} = OrR1 <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b"
"a\<sharp>(c,P,b) \<Longrightarrow> (OrR2 <a>.M b){y:=<c>.P} = OrR2 <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(y,N,P,z);u\<sharp>(y,M,P,z);x\<noteq>u\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (OrL (x).M (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} =
(if z=y then fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z')
else OrL (x).(M{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(b,c,P); x\<sharp>(y,P)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpR (x).<a>.M b){y:=<c>.P} = ImpR (x).<a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,c,P);x\<sharp>(y,P,M,z)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpL <a>.M (x).N z){y:=<c>.P} =
(if y=z then fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z')
else ImpL <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z)"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1,x3,y2)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1,x3,y2)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x3,P,y1,y2)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::name. x\<sharp>(x3,P,y1,y2)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(fresh_guess)+
done
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "(d::name,z::coname,P::trm)")
"(Ax x a){d:=(z).P} = (if d=a then Cut <a>.(Ax x a) (z).P else Ax x a)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(d,P,N);x\<sharp>(z,P,M)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Cut <a>.M (x).N){d:=(z).P} =
(if N=Ax x d then Cut <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) (z).P else Cut <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) (x).(N{d:=(z).P}))"
"x\<sharp>(z,P) \<Longrightarrow> (NotR (x).M a){d:=(z).P} =
(if d=a then fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.NotR (x).(M{d:=(z).P}) a' (z).P) else NotR (x).(M{d:=(z).P}) a)"
"a\<sharp>(d,P) \<Longrightarrow> (NotL <a>.M x){d:=(z).P} = NotL <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) x"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(P,c,N,d);b\<sharp>(P,c,M,d);b\<noteq>a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c){d:=(z).P} =
(if d=c then fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) <b>.(N{d:=(z).P}) a') (z).P)
else AndR <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) <b>.(N{d:=(z).P}) c)"
"x\<sharp>(y,z,P) \<Longrightarrow> (AndL1 (x).M y){d:=(z).P} = AndL1 (x).(M{d:=(z).P}) y"
"x\<sharp>(y,P,z) \<Longrightarrow> (AndL2 (x).M y){d:=(z).P} = AndL2 (x).(M{d:=(z).P}) y"
"a\<sharp>(d,P,b) \<Longrightarrow> (OrR1 <a>.M b){d:=(z).P} =
(if d=b then fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR1 <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) a' (z).P) else OrR1 <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) b)"
"a\<sharp>(d,P,b) \<Longrightarrow> (OrR2 <a>.M b){d:=(z).P} =
(if d=b then fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR2 <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) a' (z).P) else OrR2 <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) b)"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z,P,u);y\<sharp>(M,z,P,u);x\<noteq>y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (OrL (x).M (y).N u){d:=(z).P} =
OrL (x).(M{d:=(z).P}) (y).(N{d:=(z).P}) u"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(b,d,P); x\<sharp>(z,P)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpR (x).<a>.M b){d:=(z).P} =
(if d=b then fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) a' (z).P)
else ImpR (x).<a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) b)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,d,P);x\<sharp>(y,z,P,M)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (ImpL <a>.M (x).N y){d:=(z).P} =
ImpL <a>.(M{d:=(z).P}) (x).(N{d:=(z).P}) y"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fs_name1 fs_coname1)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1,x3,y2)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1,x3,y2)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,x2,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x::coname. x\<sharp>(x1,P,x2,y1)", erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh', simp add: fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp)+
apply(fresh_guess add: abs_fresh fresh_prod)+
done
lemma csubst_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>(M{c:=(x).N}) = (pi1\<bullet>M){(pi1\<bullet>c):=(pi1\<bullet>x).(pi1\<bullet>N)}"
and "pi2\<bullet>(M{c:=(x).N}) = (pi2\<bullet>M){(pi2\<bullet>c):=(pi2\<bullet>x).(pi2\<bullet>N)}"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eq_bij fresh_bij eqvts)
apply(perm_simp)+
done
lemma nsubst_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>(M{x:=<c>.N}) = (pi1\<bullet>M){(pi1\<bullet>x):=<(pi1\<bullet>c)>.(pi1\<bullet>N)}"
and "pi2\<bullet>(M{x:=<c>.N}) = (pi2\<bullet>M){(pi2\<bullet>x):=<(pi2\<bullet>c)>.(pi2\<bullet>N)}"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eq_bij fresh_bij eqvts)
apply(perm_simp)+
done
lemma supp_subst1:
shows "supp (M{y:=<c>.P}) \<subseteq> ((supp M) - {y}) \<union> (supp P)"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: y P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)+
done
lemma supp_subst2:
shows "supp (M{y:=<c>.P}) \<subseteq> supp (M) \<union> ((supp P) - {c})"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: y P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)+
done
lemma supp_subst3:
shows "supp (M{c:=(x).P}) \<subseteq> ((supp M) - {c}) \<union> (supp P)"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
done
lemma supp_subst4:
shows "supp (M{c:=(x).P}) \<subseteq> (supp M) \<union> ((supp P) - {x})"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
done
lemma supp_subst5:
shows "(supp M - {y}) \<subseteq> supp (M{y:=<c>.P})"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: y P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)
done
lemma supp_subst6:
shows "(supp M) \<subseteq> ((supp (M{y:=<c>.P}))::coname set)"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: y P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{y:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(blast)
done
lemma supp_subst7:
shows "(supp M - {c}) \<subseteq> supp (M{c:=(x).P})"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)
done
lemma supp_subst8:
shows "(supp M) \<subseteq> ((supp (M{c:=(x).P}))::name set)"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x P c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_def abs_supp trm.supp supp_atm fin_supp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(blast)+
done
lemmas subst_supp = supp_subst1 supp_subst2 supp_subst3 supp_subst4
supp_subst5 supp_subst6 supp_subst7 supp_subst8
lemma subst_fresh:
fixes x::"name"
and c::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>P \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M{x:=<c>.P}"
and "b\<sharp>P \<Longrightarrow> b\<sharp>M{b:=(y).P}"
and "x\<sharp>(M,P) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M{y:=<c>.P}"
and "x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M{c:=(x).P}"
and "x\<sharp>(M,P) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M{c:=(y).P}"
and "b\<sharp>(M,P) \<Longrightarrow> b\<sharp>M{c:=(y).P}"
and "b\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> b\<sharp>M{y:=<b>.P}"
and "b\<sharp>(M,P) \<Longrightarrow> b\<sharp>M{y:=<c>.P}"
apply -
apply(insert subst_supp)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_def supp_prod)
apply(blast)+
done
lemma forget:
shows "x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> M{x:=<c>.P} = M"
and "c\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> M{c:=(x).P} = M"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
done
lemma substc_rename1:
assumes a: "c\<sharp>(M,a)"
shows "M{a:=(x).N} = ([(c,a)]\<bullet>M){c:=(x).N}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: c a x N rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z d)
then show ?case by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm trm.inject alpha)
next
case NotL
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
next
case (NotR y M d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{d:=(x).N},([(c,d)]\<bullet>M){c:=(x).N})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (AndR c1 M c2 M' c3)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{c3:=(x).N},
M'{c3:=(x).N},c1,c2,c3,([(c,c3)]\<bullet>M){c:=(x).N},([(c,c3)]\<bullet>M'){c:=(x).N})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(simp add: fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_left)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_left)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
done
next
case AndL1
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
next
case AndL2
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
next
case (OrR1 d M e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{e:=(x).N},([(c,e)]\<bullet>M){c:=(x).N},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrR2 d M e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{e:=(x).N},([(c,e)]\<bullet>M){c:=(x).N},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrL x1 M x2 M' x3)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case ImpL
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case (ImpR y d M e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{e:=(x).N},([(c,e)]\<bullet>M){c:=(x).N},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (Cut d M y M')
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
qed
lemma substc_rename2:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>(N,x)"
shows "M{a:=(x).N} = M{a:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: a x y N rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z d)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left)
next
case NotL
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left)
next
case (NotR y M d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{d:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)},[(y,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (AndR c1 M c2 M' c3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac
"\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{c3:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)},M'{c3:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)},[(y,x)]\<bullet>N,c1,c2,c3)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_fresh perm_swap fresh_left)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case AndL1
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case AndL2
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case (OrR1 d M e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{e:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)},[(y,x)]\<bullet>N,d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrR2 d M e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{e:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)},[(y,x)]\<bullet>N,d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrL x1 M x2 M' x3)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case ImpL
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case (ImpR y d M e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(N,M{e:=(y).([(y,x)]\<bullet>N)},[(y,x)]\<bullet>N,d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (Cut d M y M')
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left perm_swap)
qed
lemma substn_rename3:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>(M,x)"
shows "M{x:=<a>.N} = ([(y,x)]\<bullet>M){y:=<a>.N}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: a x y N rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z d)
then show ?case by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm trm.inject alpha)
next
case NotR
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
next
case (NotL d M z)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<a>.N},([(y,x)]\<bullet>M){y:=<a>.N})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndR c1 M c2 M' c3)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case OrR1
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
next
case OrR2
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
next
case (AndL1 u M v)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<a>.N},([(y,x)]\<bullet>M){y:=<a>.N},u,v)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndL2 u M v)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<a>.N},([(y,x)]\<bullet>M){y:=<a>.N},u,v)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (OrL x1 M x2 M' x3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac
"\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<a>.N},M'{x:=<a>.N},([(y,x)]\<bullet>M){y:=<a>.N},([(y,x)]\<bullet>M'){y:=<a>.N},x1,x2)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case ImpR
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_left abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod)
next
case (ImpL d M v M' u)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac
"\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{u:=<a>.N},M'{u:=<a>.N},([(y,u)]\<bullet>M){y:=<a>.N},([(y,u)]\<bullet>M'){y:=<a>.N},d,v)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (Cut d M y M')
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
qed
lemma substn_rename4:
assumes a: "c\<sharp>(N,a)"
shows "M{x:=<a>.N} = M{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c a N rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z d)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left)
next
case NotR
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left)
next
case (NotL d M y)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},[(c,a)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (OrL x1 M x2 M' x3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac
"\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},M'{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},[(c,a)]\<bullet>N,x1,x2,x3)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_fresh perm_swap fresh_left)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case OrR1
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case OrR2
then show ?case by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case (AndL1 u M v)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},[(c,a)]\<bullet>N,u,v)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndL2 u M v)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},[(c,a)]\<bullet>N,u,v)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndR c1 M c2 M' c3)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case ImpR
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
next
case (ImpL d M y M' u)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(N,M{u:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},M'{u:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>N)},[(c,a)]\<bullet>N,y,u)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha perm_swap fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (Cut d M y M')
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: calc_atm trm.inject alpha fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left perm_swap)
qed
lemma subst_rename5:
assumes a: "c'\<sharp>(c,N)" "x'\<sharp>(x,M)"
shows "M{x:=<c>.N} = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M){x':=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>N)}"
proof -
have "M{x:=<c>.N} = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M){x':=<c>.N}" using a by (simp add: substn_rename3)
also have "\<dots> = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M){x':=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>N)}" using a by (simp add: substn_rename4)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma subst_rename6:
assumes a: "c'\<sharp>(c,M)" "x'\<sharp>(x,N)"
shows "M{c:=(x).N} = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M){c':=(x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)}"
proof -
have "M{c:=(x).N} = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M){c':=(x).N}" using a by (simp add: substc_rename1)
also have "\<dots> = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M){c':=(x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)}" using a by (simp add: substc_rename2)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemmas subst_rename = substc_rename1 substc_rename2 substn_rename3 substn_rename4 subst_rename5 subst_rename6
lemma better_Cut_substn[simp]:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>[c].P" "x\<sharp>(y,P)"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){y:=<c>.P} =
(if M=Ax y a then Cut <c>.P (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}) else Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}))"
proof -
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,c,P,x,y)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,c,P,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq1: "(Cut <a>.M (x).N) = (Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N))"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
have eq2: "(M=Ax y a) = (([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)=Ax y a')"
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
have "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){y:=<c>.P} = (Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)){y:=<c>.P}"
using eq1 by simp
also have "\<dots> = (if ([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)=Ax y a' then Cut <c>.P (x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>N){y:=<c>.P})
else Cut <a'>.(([(a',a)]\<bullet>M){y:=<c>.P}) (x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>N){y:=<c>.P}))"
using fs1 fs2 by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> =(if M=Ax y a then Cut <c>.P (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}) else Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(N{y:=<c>.P}))"
using fs1 fs2 a
apply -
apply(simp only: eq2[symmetric])
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp_all add: alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod subst_fresh)
apply(simp_all add: eqvts perm_fresh_fresh calc_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_Cut_substc[simp]:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(c,P)" "x\<sharp>[y].P"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){c:=(y).P} =
(if N=Ax x c then Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (y).P else Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x).(N{c:=(y).P}))"
proof -
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,c,P,x,y)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,c,P,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq1: "(Cut <a>.M (x).N) = (Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N))"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
have eq2: "(N=Ax x c) = (([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)=Ax x' c)"
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
have "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){c:=(y).P} = (Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)){c:=(y).P}"
using eq1 by simp
also have "\<dots> = (if ([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)=Ax x' c then Cut <a'>.(([(a',a)]\<bullet>M){c:=(y).P}) (y).P
else Cut <a'>.(([(a',a)]\<bullet>M){c:=(y).P}) (x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>N){c:=(y).P}))"
using fs1 fs2 by (simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm trm.inject)
also have "\<dots> =(if N=Ax x c then Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (y).P else Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x).(N{c:=(y).P}))"
using fs1 fs2 a
apply -
apply(simp only: eq2[symmetric])
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp_all add: alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod subst_fresh)
apply(simp_all add: eqvts perm_fresh_fresh calc_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_Cut_substn':
assumes a: "a\<sharp>[c].P" "y\<sharp>(N,x)" "M\<noteq>Ax y a"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){y:=<c>.P} = Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x).N"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <a>.M (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac"y\<sharp>([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma better_NotR_substc:
assumes a: "d\<sharp>M"
shows "(NotR (x).M d){d:=(z).P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.NotR (x).M a' (z).P)"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "NotR (x).M d = NotR (c).([(c,x)]\<bullet>M) d")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_left, auto)
done
lemma better_NotL_substn:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>M"
shows "(NotL <a>.M y){y:=<c>.P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').NotL <a>.M x')"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "NotL <a>.M y = NotL <ca>.([(ca,a)]\<bullet>M) y")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_left, auto)
done
lemma better_AndL1_substn:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>[x].M"
shows "(AndL1 (x).M y){y:=<c>.P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).M z')"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "AndL1 (x).M y = AndL1 (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>M) y")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
done
lemma better_AndL2_substn:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>[x].M"
shows "(AndL2 (x).M y){y:=<c>.P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).M z')"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "AndL2 (x).M y = AndL2 (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>M) y")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
done
lemma better_AndR_substc:
assumes a: "c\<sharp>([a].M,[b].N)"
shows "(AndR <a>.M <b>.N c){c:=(z).P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <a>.M <b>.N a') (z).P)"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "AndR <a>.M <b>.N c = AndR <ca>.([(ca,a)]\<bullet>M) <caa>.([(caa,b)]\<bullet>N) c")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule forget)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule forget)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh)[1]
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
done
lemma better_OrL_substn:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>([y].M,[z].N)"
shows "(OrL (y).M (z).N x){x:=<c>.P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (y).M (z).N z')"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "OrL (y).M (z).N x = OrL (ca).([(ca,y)]\<bullet>M) (caa).([(caa,z)]\<bullet>N) x")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule forget)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule forget)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh)[1]
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
done
lemma better_OrR1_substc:
assumes a: "d\<sharp>[a].M"
shows "(OrR1 <a>.M d){d:=(z).P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR1 <a>.M a' (z).P)"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "OrR1 <a>.M d = OrR1 <c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>M) d")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
done
lemma better_OrR2_substc:
assumes a: "d\<sharp>[a].M"
shows "(OrR2 <a>.M d){d:=(z).P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR2 <a>.M a' (z).P)"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "OrR2 <a>.M d = OrR2 <c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>M) d")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
done
lemma better_ImpR_substc:
assumes a: "d\<sharp>[a].M"
shows "(ImpR (x).<a>.M d){d:=(z).P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.ImpR (x).<a>.M a' (z).P)"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "ImpR (x).<a>.M d = ImpR (ca).<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>[(ca,x)]\<bullet>M) d")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_perm)
done
lemma better_ImpL_substn:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>(M,[x].N)"
shows "(ImpL <a>.M (x).N y){y:=<c>.P} = fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.M (x).N z')"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "ImpL <a>.M (x).N y = ImpL <ca>.([(ca,a)]\<bullet>M) (caa).([(caa,x)]\<bullet>N) y")
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm forget abs_fresh)[1]
apply(rule_tac f="fresh_fun" in arg_cong)
apply(simp add: expand_fun_eq)
apply(rule allI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(rule forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_perm)
done
lemma freshn_after_substc:
fixes x::"name"
assumes a: "x\<sharp>M{c:=(y).P}"
shows "x\<sharp>M"
using a supp_subst8
apply(simp add: fresh_def)
apply(blast)
done
lemma freshn_after_substn:
fixes x::"name"
assumes a: "x\<sharp>M{y:=<c>.P}" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "x\<sharp>M"
using a
using a supp_subst5
apply(simp add: fresh_def)
apply(blast)
done
lemma freshc_after_substc:
fixes a::"coname"
assumes a: "a\<sharp>M{c:=(y).P}" "a\<noteq>c"
shows "a\<sharp>M"
using a supp_subst7
apply(simp add: fresh_def)
apply(blast)
done
lemma freshc_after_substn:
fixes a::"coname"
assumes a: "a\<sharp>M{y:=<c>.P}"
shows "a\<sharp>M"
using a supp_subst6
apply(simp add: fresh_def)
apply(blast)
done
lemma substn_crename_comm:
assumes a: "c\<noteq>a" "c\<noteq>b"
shows "M{x:=<c>.P}[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.(P[a\<turnstile>c>b])}"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,x,c)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.P (x).Ax x a = Cut <c>.P (x').Ax x' a")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha trm.inject calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha trm.inject calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: crename_id)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_ax)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],x,trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],name1,trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],name1,trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<c>.P},trm2{x:=<c>.P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],name1,name2,
trm1[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]},trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},trm2{name2:=<c>.P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],name1,
trm1[a\<turnstile>c>b]{name2:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]},trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]{name2:=<c>.P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
done
lemma substc_crename_comm:
assumes a: "c\<noteq>a" "c\<noteq>b"
shows "M{c:=(x).P}[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{c:=(x).(P[a\<turnstile>c>b])}"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule crename_ax)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(a,b,trm{coname:=(x).P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],x,trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{coname:=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,coname2,a,b,trm1{coname3:=(x).P},trm2{coname3:=(x).P},
P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],x,trm1[a\<turnstile>c>b]{coname3:=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]},trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]{coname3:=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],a,b,
trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{coname2:=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],a,b,
trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{coname2:=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,P[a\<turnstile>c>b],a,b,
trm[a\<turnstile>c>b]{coname2:=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
done
lemma substn_nrename_comm:
assumes a: "x\<noteq>y" "x\<noteq>z"
shows "M{x:=<c>.P}[y\<turnstile>n>z] = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.(P[y\<turnstile>n>z])}"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P y z rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(drule nrename_ax)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(y,z,trm{x:=<c>.P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],x,trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],name1,trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]},y,z)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(y,z,trm{x:=<c>.P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],name1,trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<c>.P},trm2{x:=<c>.P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],name1,name2,y,z,
trm1[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]},trm2[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},trm2{name2:=<c>.P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],y,z,name1,
trm1[y\<turnstile>n>z]{name2:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]},trm2[y\<turnstile>n>z]{name2:=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
done
lemma substc_nrename_comm:
assumes a: "x\<noteq>y" "x\<noteq>z"
shows "M{c:=(x).P}[y\<turnstile>n>z] = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x).(P[y\<turnstile>n>z])}"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P y z rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule nrename_ax)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule nrename_ax)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(y,z,trm{coname:=(x).P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],x,trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{coname:=(x).P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,coname2,y,z,trm1{coname3:=(x).P},trm2{coname3:=(x).P},
P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],x,trm1[y\<turnstile>n>z]{coname3:=(x).P[y\<turnstile>n>z]},trm2[y\<turnstile>n>z]{coname3:=(x).P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],y,z,
trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{coname2:=(x).P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],y,z,
trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{coname2:=(x).P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(coname1,trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,P[y\<turnstile>n>z],y,z,
trm[y\<turnstile>n>z]{coname2:=(x).P[y\<turnstile>n>z]})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
done
lemma substn_crename_comm':
assumes a: "a\<noteq>c" "a\<sharp>P"
shows "M{x:=<c>.P}[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof -
assume a1: "a\<noteq>c"
assume a2: "a\<sharp>P"
obtain c'::"coname" where fs2: "c'\<sharp>(c,P,a,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq: "M{x:=<c>.P} = M{x:=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp)
done
have eq': "M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P} = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp)
done
have eq2: "([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)" using fs2 a2 a1
apply -
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
have "M{x:=<c>.P}[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M{x:=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)}[a\<turnstile>c>b]" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c'>.(([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)[a\<turnstile>c>b])}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule substn_crename_comm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c'>.(([(c',c)]\<bullet>P))}" using eq2 by simp
also have "\<dots> = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{x:=<c>.P}" using eq' by simp
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma substc_crename_comm':
assumes a: "c\<noteq>a" "c\<noteq>b" "a\<sharp>P"
shows "M{c:=(x).P}[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{c:=(x).P}"
using a
proof -
assume a1: "c\<noteq>a"
assume a1': "c\<noteq>b"
assume a2: "a\<sharp>P"
obtain c'::"coname" where fs2: "c'\<sharp>(c,M,a,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq: "M{c:=(x).P} = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M){c':=(x).P}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp)
done
have eq': "([(c',c)]\<bullet>(M[a\<turnstile>c>b])){c':=(x).P} = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{c:=(x).P}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename[symmetric])
apply(simp add: rename_fresh)
done
have eq2: "([(c',c)]\<bullet>M)[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>(M[a\<turnstile>c>b]))" using fs2 a2 a1 a1'
apply -
apply(simp add: rename_eqvts)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
have "M{c:=(x).P}[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M){c':=(x).P}[a\<turnstile>c>b]" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M)[a\<turnstile>c>b]{c':=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule substc_crename_comm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>(M[a\<turnstile>c>b])){c':=(x).P[a\<turnstile>c>b]}" using eq2 by simp
also have "\<dots> = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>(M[a\<turnstile>c>b])){c':=(x).P}" using a2 by (simp add: rename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{c:=(x).P}" using eq' by simp
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma substn_nrename_comm':
assumes a: "x\<noteq>y" "x\<noteq>z" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "M{x:=<c>.P}[y\<turnstile>n>z] = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof -
assume a1: "x\<noteq>y"
assume a1': "x\<noteq>z"
assume a2: "y\<sharp>P"
obtain x'::"name" where fs2: "x'\<sharp>(x,M,y,z)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq: "M{x:=<c>.P} = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M){x':=<c>.P}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp)
done
have eq': "([(x',x)]\<bullet>(M[y\<turnstile>n>z])){x':=<c>.P} = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename[symmetric])
apply(simp add: rename_fresh)
done
have eq2: "([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)[y\<turnstile>n>z] = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>(M[y\<turnstile>n>z]))" using fs2 a2 a1 a1'
apply -
apply(simp add: rename_eqvts)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
have "M{x:=<c>.P}[y\<turnstile>n>z] = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M){x':=<c>.P}[y\<turnstile>n>z]" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x':=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule substn_nrename_comm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>(M[y\<turnstile>n>z])){x':=<c>.P[y\<turnstile>n>z]}" using eq2 by simp
also have "\<dots> = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>(M[y\<turnstile>n>z])){x':=<c>.P}" using a2 by (simp add: rename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{x:=<c>.P}" using eq' by simp
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma substc_nrename_comm':
assumes a: "x\<noteq>y" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "M{c:=(x).P}[y\<turnstile>n>z] = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x).P}"
using a
proof -
assume a1: "x\<noteq>y"
assume a2: "y\<sharp>P"
obtain x'::"name" where fs2: "x'\<sharp>(x,P,y,z)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
have eq: "M{c:=(x).P} = M{c:=(x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>P)}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp)
done
have eq': "M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x).P} = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>P)}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp)
done
have eq2: "([(x',x)]\<bullet>P)[y\<turnstile>n>z] = ([(x',x)]\<bullet>P)" using fs2 a2 a1
apply -
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
have "M{c:=(x).P}[y\<turnstile>n>z] = M{c:=(x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>P)}[y\<turnstile>n>z]" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>P)[y\<turnstile>n>z])}"
using fs2
apply -
apply(rule substc_nrename_comm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x').(([(x',x)]\<bullet>P))}" using eq2 by simp
also have "\<dots> = M[y\<turnstile>n>z]{c:=(x).P}" using eq' by simp
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemmas subst_comm = substn_crename_comm substc_crename_comm
substn_nrename_comm substc_nrename_comm
lemmas subst_comm' = substn_crename_comm' substc_crename_comm'
substn_nrename_comm' substc_nrename_comm'
text {* typing contexts *}
types
ctxtn = "(name\<times>ty) list"
ctxtc = "(coname\<times>ty) list"
inductive
validc :: "ctxtc \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
vc1[intro]: "validc []"
| vc2[intro]: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>\<Delta>; validc \<Delta>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> validc ((a,T)#\<Delta>)"
equivariance validc
inductive
validn :: "ctxtn \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
vn1[intro]: "validn []"
| vn2[intro]: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>\<Gamma>; validn \<Gamma>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> validn ((x,T)#\<Gamma>)"
equivariance validn
lemma fresh_ctxt:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
and \<Gamma>::"ctxtn"
and \<Delta>::"ctxtc"
shows "a\<sharp>\<Gamma>" and "x\<sharp>\<Delta>"
proof -
show "a\<sharp>\<Gamma>" by (induct \<Gamma>) (auto simp add: fresh_list_nil fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_ty)
next
show "x\<sharp>\<Delta>" by (induct \<Delta>) (auto simp add: fresh_list_nil fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_ty)
qed
text {* cut-reductions *}
declare abs_perm[eqvt]
inductive
fin :: "trm \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
[intro]: "fin (Ax x a) x"
| [intro]: "x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> fin (NotL <a>.M x) x"
| [intro]: "y\<sharp>[x].M \<Longrightarrow> fin (AndL1 (x).M y) y"
| [intro]: "y\<sharp>[x].M \<Longrightarrow> fin (AndL2 (x).M y) y"
| [intro]: "\<lbrakk>z\<sharp>[x].M;z\<sharp>[y].N\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> fin (OrL (x).M (y).N z) z"
| [intro]: "\<lbrakk>y\<sharp>M;y\<sharp>[x].N\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> fin (ImpL <a>.M (x).N y) y"
equivariance fin
lemma fin_Ax_elim:
assumes a: "fin (Ax x a) y"
shows "x=y"
using a
apply(erule_tac fin.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fin_NotL_elim:
assumes a: "fin (NotL <a>.M x) y"
shows "x=y \<and> x\<sharp>M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fin.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "y\<sharp>[aa].Ma")
apply(drule sym)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma fin_AndL1_elim:
assumes a: "fin (AndL1 (x).M y) z"
shows "z=y \<and> z\<sharp>[x].M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fin.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fin_AndL2_elim:
assumes a: "fin (AndL2 (x).M y) z"
shows "z=y \<and> z\<sharp>[x].M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fin.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fin_OrL_elim:
assumes a: "fin (OrL (x).M (y).N u) z"
shows "z=u \<and> z\<sharp>[x].M \<and> z\<sharp>[y].N"
using a
apply(erule_tac fin.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fin_ImpL_elim:
assumes a: "fin (ImpL <a>.M (x).N z) y"
shows "z=y \<and> z\<sharp>M \<and> z\<sharp>[x].N"
using a
apply(erule_tac fin.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "y\<sharp>[aa].Ma")
apply(drule sym)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma fin_rest_elims:
shows "fin (Cut <a>.M (x).N) y \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fin (NotR (x).M c) y \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fin (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c) y \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fin (OrR1 <a>.M b) y \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fin (OrR2 <a>.M b) y \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fin (ImpR (x).<a>.M b) y \<Longrightarrow> False"
by (erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)+
lemmas fin_elims = fin_Ax_elim fin_NotL_elim fin_AndL1_elim fin_AndL2_elim fin_OrL_elim
fin_ImpL_elim fin_rest_elims
lemma fin_rename:
shows "fin M x \<Longrightarrow> fin ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) x'"
by (induct rule: fin.induct)
(auto simp add: calc_atm simp add: fresh_left abs_fresh)
lemma not_fin_subst1:
assumes a: "\<not>(fin M x)"
shows "\<not>(fin (M{c:=(y).P}) x)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c y P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(y).P},P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(y).P},trm2{coname3:=(y).P},P,coname1,coname2,coname3,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(y).P},trm2{coname3:=(y).P},P,coname1,coname2,coname3,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(drule fin_AndL1_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(subgoal_tac "name2\<sharp>[name1]. trm")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(drule fin_AndL2_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(subgoal_tac "name2\<sharp>[name1].trm")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).P},coname1,P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).P},coname1,P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(drule fin_OrL_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)+
apply(subgoal_tac "name3\<sharp>[name1].trm1 \<and> name3\<sharp>[name2].trm2")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).P},coname1,P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(drule fin_ImpL_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)+
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>[name1].trm2")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma not_fin_subst2:
assumes a: "\<not>(fin M x)"
shows "\<not>(fin (M{y:=<c>.P}) x)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c y P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fin_NotL_elim)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fin_AndL1_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "name2\<sharp>[name1]. trm")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fin_AndL2_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "name2\<sharp>[name1].trm")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},trm2{y:=<c>.P},name1,name2,P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fin_OrL_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "name3\<sharp>[name1].trm1 \<and> name3\<sharp>[name2].trm2")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::name. a'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},trm2{name2:=<c>.P},name1,P,x)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fin_ImpL_elim)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(drule freshn_after_substn)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>[name1].trm2")
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma fin_subst1:
assumes a: "fin M x" "x\<noteq>y" "x\<sharp>P"
shows "fin (M{y:=<c>.P}) x"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fin_elims simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(rule fin.intros, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh, simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
lemma fin_subst2:
assumes a: "fin M y" "x\<noteq>y" "y\<sharp>P" "M\<noteq>Ax y c"
shows "fin (M{c:=(x).P}) y"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
done
lemma fin_substn_nrename:
assumes a: "fin M x" "x\<noteq>y" "x\<sharp>P"
shows "M[x\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P} = Cut <c>.P (x).(M{y:=<c>.P})"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(drule fin_Ax_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_NotL_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z::name. z\<sharp>(trm,y,x,P,trm[x\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(drule fin_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_AndL1_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z::name. z\<sharp>(name2,name1,P,trm[name2\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P},y,P,trm)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(drule fin_AndL2_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z::name. z\<sharp>(name2,name1,P,trm[name2\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P},y,P,trm)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(drule fin_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_OrL_elim)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z::name. z\<sharp>(name3,name2,name1,P,trm1[name3\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P},trm2[name3\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P},y,P,trm1,trm2)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
apply(drule fin_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fin_ImpL_elim)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z::name. z\<sharp>(name1,x,P,trm1[x\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P},trm2[x\<turnstile>n>y]{y:=<c>.P},y,P,trm1,trm2)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: nsubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(rule exists_fresh')
apply(rule fin_supp)
done
inductive
fic :: "trm \<Rightarrow> coname \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
[intro]: "fic (Ax x a) a"
| [intro]: "a\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> fic (NotR (x).M a) a"
| [intro]: "\<lbrakk>c\<sharp>[a].M;c\<sharp>[b].N\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> fic (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c) c"
| [intro]: "b\<sharp>[a].M \<Longrightarrow> fic (OrR1 <a>.M b) b"
| [intro]: "b\<sharp>[a].M \<Longrightarrow> fic (OrR2 <a>.M b) b"
| [intro]: "\<lbrakk>b\<sharp>[a].M\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> fic (ImpR (x).<a>.M b) b"
equivariance fic
lemma fic_Ax_elim:
assumes a: "fic (Ax x a) b"
shows "a=b"
using a
apply(erule_tac fic.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fic_NotR_elim:
assumes a: "fic (NotR (x).M a) b"
shows "a=b \<and> b\<sharp>M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fic.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "b\<sharp>[xa].Ma")
apply(drule sym)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma fic_OrR1_elim:
assumes a: "fic (OrR1 <a>.M b) c"
shows "b=c \<and> c\<sharp>[a].M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fic.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fic_OrR2_elim:
assumes a: "fic (OrR2 <a>.M b) c"
shows "b=c \<and> c\<sharp>[a].M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fic.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fic_AndR_elim:
assumes a: "fic (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c) d"
shows "c=d \<and> d\<sharp>[a].M \<and> d\<sharp>[b].N"
using a
apply(erule_tac fic.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fic_ImpR_elim:
assumes a: "fic (ImpR (x).<a>.M b) c"
shows "b=c \<and> b\<sharp>[a].M"
using a
apply(erule_tac fic.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>[xa].[aa].Ma")
apply(drule sym)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma fic_rest_elims:
shows "fic (Cut <a>.M (x).N) d \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fic (NotL <a>.M x) d \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fic (OrL (x).M (y).N z) d \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fic (AndL1 (x).M y) d \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fic (AndL2 (x).M y) d \<Longrightarrow> False"
and "fic (ImpL <a>.M (x).N y) d \<Longrightarrow> False"
by (erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)+
lemmas fic_elims = fic_Ax_elim fic_NotR_elim fic_OrR1_elim fic_OrR2_elim fic_AndR_elim
fic_ImpR_elim fic_rest_elims
lemma fic_rename:
shows "fic M a \<Longrightarrow> fic ([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) a'"
by (induct rule: fic.induct)
(auto simp add: calc_atm simp add: fresh_left abs_fresh)
lemma not_fic_subst1:
assumes a: "\<not>(fic M a)"
shows "\<not>(fic (M{y:=<c>.P}) a)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a c y P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{y:=<c>.P},trm2{y:=<c>.P},P,name1,name2,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},trm2{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,name2,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
done
lemma not_fic_subst2:
assumes a: "\<not>(fic M a)"
shows "\<not>(fic (M{c:=(y).P}) a)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a c y P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(y).P},P,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule freshc_after_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(y).P},trm2{coname3:=(y).P},P,coname1,coname2,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(drule freshc_after_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).P},P,coname1,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).P},P,coname1,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).P},P,coname1,a)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
done
lemma fic_subst1:
assumes a: "fic M a" "a\<noteq>b" "a\<sharp>P"
shows "fic (M{b:=(x).P}) a"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x b a P rule: trm.induct)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp add: fic.intros)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
done
lemma fic_subst2:
assumes a: "fic M a" "c\<noteq>a" "a\<sharp>P" "M\<noteq>Ax x a"
shows "fic (M{x:=<c>.P}) a"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x a c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
done
lemma fic_substc_crename:
assumes a: "fic M a" "a\<noteq>b" "a\<sharp>P"
shows "M[a\<turnstile>c>b]{b:=(y).P} = Cut <a>.(M{b:=(y).P}) (y).P"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a b y P rule: trm.induct)
apply(drule fic_Ax_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha calc_atm fresh_atm trm.inject)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_NotR_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: csubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: crename_fresh)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_AndR_elim)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm subst_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: csubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: csubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(drule fic_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_OrR1_elim)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: csubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(drule fic_OrR2_elim)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: csubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(drule fic_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule fic_ImpR_elim)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: csubst_eqvt calc_atm)
apply(simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(drule fic_rest_elims)
apply(simp)
done
inductive
l_redu :: "trm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l _" [100,100] 100)
where
LAxR: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>M; a\<sharp>b; fic M a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).(Ax x b) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M[a\<turnstile>c>b]"
| LAxL: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>M; x\<sharp>y; fin M x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.(Ax y a) (x).M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
| LNot: "\<lbrakk>y\<sharp>(M,N); x\<sharp>(N,y); a\<sharp>(M,N,b); b\<sharp>M; y\<noteq>x; b\<noteq>a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
Cut <a>.(NotR (x).M a) (y).(NotL <b>.N y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b>.N (x).M"
| LAnd1: "\<lbrakk>b\<sharp>([a1].M1,[a2].M2,N,a1,a2); y\<sharp>([x].N,M1,M2,x); x\<sharp>(M1,M2); a1\<sharp>(M2,N); a2\<sharp>(M1,N); a1\<noteq>a2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
Cut <b>.(AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b) (y).(AndL1 (x).N y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a1>.M1 (x).N"
| LAnd2: "\<lbrakk>b\<sharp>([a1].M1,[a2].M2,N,a1,a2); y\<sharp>([x].N,M1,M2,x); x\<sharp>(M1,M2); a1\<sharp>(M2,N); a2\<sharp>(M1,N); a1\<noteq>a2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
Cut <b>.(AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b) (y).(AndL2 (x).N y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a2>.M2 (x).N"
| LOr1: "\<lbrakk>b\<sharp>([a].M,N1,N2,a); y\<sharp>([x1].N1,[x2].N2,M,x1,x2); x1\<sharp>(M,N2); x2\<sharp>(M,N1); a\<sharp>(N1,N2); x1\<noteq>x2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
Cut <b>.(OrR1 <a>.M b) (y).(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a>.M (x1).N1"
| LOr2: "\<lbrakk>b\<sharp>([a].M,N1,N2,a); y\<sharp>([x1].N1,[x2].N2,M,x1,x2); x1\<sharp>(M,N2); x2\<sharp>(M,N1); a\<sharp>(N1,N2); x1\<noteq>x2\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
Cut <b>.(OrR2 <a>.M b) (y).(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a>.M (x2).N2"
| LImp: "\<lbrakk>z\<sharp>(N,[y].P,[x].M,y,x); b\<sharp>([a].M,[c].N,P,c,a); x\<sharp>(N,[y].P,y);
c\<sharp>(P,[a].M,b,a); a\<sharp>([c].N,P); y\<sharp>(N,[x].M)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
Cut <b>.(ImpR (x).<a>.M b) (z).(ImpL <c>.N (y).P z) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.N (x).M) (y).P"
equivariance l_redu
lemma l_redu_eqvt':
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>M) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l (pi1\<bullet>M') \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
and "(pi2\<bullet>M) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l (pi2\<bullet>M') \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
apply -
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi1" in l_redu.eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi2" in l_redu.eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp)
done
nominal_inductive l_redu
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh fresh_atm rename_fresh fresh_prod abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(force)+
done
lemma fresh_l_redu:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M' \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M'"
and "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M' \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>M'"
apply -
apply(induct rule: l_redu.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(case_tac "xa=x")
apply(simp add: rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)+
apply(induct rule: l_redu.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh rename_fresh)
apply(case_tac "aa=a")
apply(simp add: rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)+
done
lemma better_LAxR_intro[intro]:
shows "fic M a \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).(Ax x b) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M[a\<turnstile>c>b]"
proof -
assume fin: "fic M a"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(a,M,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.M (x).(Ax x b) = Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').(Ax x' b)"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l ([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)[a'\<turnstile>c>b]" using fs1 fs2 fin
by (auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fic_rename)
also have "\<dots> = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]" using fs1 fs2 by (simp add: crename_rename)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LAxL_intro[intro]:
shows "fin M x \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.(Ax y a) (x).M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof -
assume fin: "fin M x"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(y,M,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(a,M)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.(Ax y a) (x).M = Cut <a'>.(Ax y a') (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l ([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)[x'\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs1 fs2 fin
by (auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fin_rename)
also have "\<dots> = M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs1 fs2 by (simp add: nrename_rename)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LNot_intro[intro]:
shows "\<lbrakk>y\<sharp>N; a\<sharp>M\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.(NotR (x).M a) (y).(NotL <b>.N y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b>.N (x).M"
proof -
assume fs: "y\<sharp>N" "a\<sharp>M"
obtain x'::"name" where f1: "x'\<sharp>(y,N,M,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain y'::"name" where f2: "y'\<sharp>(y,N,M,x,x')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where f3: "a'\<sharp>(a,M,N,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b'::"coname" where f4: "b'\<sharp>(a,M,N,b,a')" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.(NotR (x).M a) (y).(NotL <b>.N y)
= Cut <a'>.(NotR (x).([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) a') (y').(NotL <b>.([(y',y)]\<bullet>N) y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4
by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.(NotR (x).M a') (y').(NotL <b>.N y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 fs by (perm_simp)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.(NotR (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) a') (y').(NotL <b'>.([(b',b)]\<bullet>N) y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4
by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b'>.([(b',b)]\<bullet>N) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 fs
by (auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b>.N (x).M"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LAnd1_intro[intro]:
shows "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>([b1].M1,[b2].M2); y\<sharp>[x].N\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.(AndR <b1>.M1 <b2>.M2 a) (y).(AndL1 (x).N y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b1>.M1 (x).N"
proof -
assume fs: "a\<sharp>([b1].M1,[b2].M2)" "y\<sharp>[x].N"
obtain x'::"name" where f1: "x'\<sharp>(y,N,M1,M2,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain y'::"name" where f2: "y'\<sharp>(y,N,M1,M2,x,x')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where f3: "a'\<sharp>(a,M1,M2,N,b1,b2)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b1'::"coname" where f4:"b1'\<sharp>(a,M1,M2,N,b1,b2,a')" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b2'::"coname" where f5:"b2'\<sharp>(a,M1,M2,N,b1,b2,a',b1')" by (rule exists_fresh(2),rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.(AndR <b1>.M1 <b2>.M2 a) (y).(AndL1 (x).N y)
= Cut <a'>.(AndR <b1>.M1 <b2>.M2 a') (y').(AndL1 (x).N y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.(AndR <b1'>.([(b1',b1)]\<bullet>M1) <b2'>.([(b2',b2)]\<bullet>M2) a')
(y').(AndL1 (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N) y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b1'>.([(b1',b1)]\<bullet>M1) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply -
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b1>.M1 (x).N"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LAnd2_intro[intro]:
shows "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>([b1].M1,[b2].M2); y\<sharp>[x].N\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.(AndR <b1>.M1 <b2>.M2 a) (y).(AndL2 (x).N y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b2>.M2 (x).N"
proof -
assume fs: "a\<sharp>([b1].M1,[b2].M2)" "y\<sharp>[x].N"
obtain x'::"name" where f1: "x'\<sharp>(y,N,M1,M2,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain y'::"name" where f2: "y'\<sharp>(y,N,M1,M2,x,x')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where f3: "a'\<sharp>(a,M1,M2,N,b1,b2)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b1'::"coname" where f4:"b1'\<sharp>(a,M1,M2,N,b1,b2,a')" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b2'::"coname" where f5:"b2'\<sharp>(a,M1,M2,N,b1,b2,a',b1')" by (rule exists_fresh(2),rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.(AndR <b1>.M1 <b2>.M2 a) (y).(AndL2 (x).N y)
= Cut <a'>.(AndR <b1>.M1 <b2>.M2 a') (y').(AndL2 (x).N y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.(AndR <b1'>.([(b1',b1)]\<bullet>M1) <b2'>.([(b2',b2)]\<bullet>M2) a')
(y').(AndL2 (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N) y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <b2'>.([(b2',b2)]\<bullet>M2) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply -
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b2>.M2 (x).N"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LOr1_intro[intro]:
shows "\<lbrakk>y\<sharp>([x1].N1,[x2].N2); b\<sharp>[a].M\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> Cut <b>.(OrR1 <a>.M b) (y).(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a>.M (x1).N1"
proof -
assume fs: "y\<sharp>([x1].N1,[x2].N2)" "b\<sharp>[a].M"
obtain y'::"name" where f1: "y'\<sharp>(y,M,N1,N2,x1,x2)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain x1'::"name" where f2: "x1'\<sharp>(y,M,N1,N2,x1,x2,y')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain x2'::"name" where f3: "x2'\<sharp>(y,M,N1,N2,x1,x2,y',x1')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where f4: "a'\<sharp>(a,N1,N2,M,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b'::"coname" where f5: "b'\<sharp>(a,N1,N2,M,b,a')" by (rule exists_fresh(2),rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <b>.(OrR1 <a>.M b) (y).(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y)
= Cut <b'>.(OrR1 <a>.M b') (y').(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b'>.(OrR1 <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) b')
(y').(OrL (x1').([(x1',x1)]\<bullet>N1) (x2').([(x2',x2)]\<bullet>N2) y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x1').([(x1',x1)]\<bullet>N1)"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply -
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.M (x1).N1"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LOr2_intro[intro]:
shows "\<lbrakk>y\<sharp>([x1].N1,[x2].N2); b\<sharp>[a].M\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> Cut <b>.(OrR2 <a>.M b) (y).(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a>.M (x2).N2"
proof -
assume fs: "y\<sharp>([x1].N1,[x2].N2)" "b\<sharp>[a].M"
obtain y'::"name" where f1: "y'\<sharp>(y,M,N1,N2,x1,x2)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain x1'::"name" where f2: "x1'\<sharp>(y,M,N1,N2,x1,x2,y')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain x2'::"name" where f3: "x2'\<sharp>(y,M,N1,N2,x1,x2,y',x1')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where f4: "a'\<sharp>(a,N1,N2,M,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b'::"coname" where f5: "b'\<sharp>(a,N1,N2,M,b,a')" by (rule exists_fresh(2),rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <b>.(OrR2 <a>.M b) (y).(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y)
= Cut <b'>.(OrR2 <a>.M b') (y').(OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b'>.(OrR2 <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) b')
(y').(OrL (x1').([(x1',x1)]\<bullet>N1) (x2').([(x2',x2)]\<bullet>N2) y')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x2').([(x2',x2)]\<bullet>N2)"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply -
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.M (x2).N2"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_LImp_intro[intro]:
shows "\<lbrakk>z\<sharp>(N,[y].P); b\<sharp>[a].M; a\<sharp>N\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> Cut <b>.(ImpR (x).<a>.M b) (z).(ImpL <c>.N (y).P z) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.N (x).M) (y).P"
proof -
assume fs: "z\<sharp>(N,[y].P)" "b\<sharp>[a].M" "a\<sharp>N"
obtain y'::"name" where f1: "y'\<sharp>(y,M,N,P,z,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain x'::"name" where f2: "x'\<sharp>(y,M,N,P,z,x,y')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain z'::"name" where f3: "z'\<sharp>(y,M,N,P,z,x,y',x')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where f4: "a'\<sharp>(a,N,P,M,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain b'::"coname" where f5: "b'\<sharp>(a,N,P,M,b,c,a')" by (rule exists_fresh(2),rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain c'::"coname" where f6: "c'\<sharp>(a,N,P,M,b,c,a',b')" by (rule exists_fresh(2),rule fin_supp, blast)
have " Cut <b>.(ImpR (x).<a>.M b) (z).(ImpL <c>.N (y).P z)
= Cut <b'>.(ImpR (x).<a>.M b') (z').(ImpL <c>.N (y).P z')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(perm_simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_left fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: perm_fresh_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b'>.(ImpR (x').<a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>([(x',x)]\<bullet>M)) b')
(z').(ImpL <c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>N) (y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>P) z')"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 fs
apply(rule_tac sym)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm calc_atm fresh_left abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm calc_atm fresh_left abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm calc_atm fresh_left abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l Cut <a'>.(Cut <c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>N) (x').([(a',a)]\<bullet>[(x',x)]\<bullet>M)) (y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>P)"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 fs
apply -
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm fresh_atm)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.N (x).M) (y).P"
using f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 fs
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(perm_simp add: alpha)
apply(perm_simp add: alpha)
apply(perm_simp add: alpha)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac pi="[(a',a)]" in pt_bij4[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: abs_perm calc_atm)
apply(perm_simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(perm_simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma alpha_coname:
fixes M::"trm"
and a::"coname"
assumes a: "[a].M = [b].N" "c\<sharp>(a,b,M,N)"
shows "M = [(a,c)]\<bullet>[(b,c)]\<bullet>N"
using a
apply(auto simp add: alpha_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(drule sym)
apply(perm_simp)
done
lemma alpha_name:
fixes M::"trm"
and x::"name"
assumes a: "[x].M = [y].N" "z\<sharp>(x,y,M,N)"
shows "M = [(x,z)]\<bullet>[(y,z)]\<bullet>N"
using a
apply(auto simp add: alpha_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(drule sym)
apply(perm_simp)
done
lemma alpha_name_coname:
fixes M::"trm"
and x::"name"
and a::"coname"
assumes a: "[x].[b].M = [y].[c].N" "z\<sharp>(x,y,M,N)" "a\<sharp>(b,c,M,N)"
shows "M = [(x,z)]\<bullet>[(b,a)]\<bullet>[(c,a)]\<bullet>[(y,z)]\<bullet>N"
using a
apply(auto simp add: alpha_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm
abs_supp fin_supp abs_fresh abs_perm fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(drule sym)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp)
done
lemma Cut_l_redu_elim:
assumes a: "Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l R"
shows "(\<exists>b. R = M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) \<or> (\<exists>y. R = N[x\<turnstile>n>y]) \<or>
(\<exists>y M' b N'. M = NotR (y).M' a \<and> N = NotL <b>.N' x \<and> R = Cut <b>.N' (y).M' \<and> fic M a \<and> fin N x) \<or>
(\<exists>b M1 c M2 y N'. M = AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a \<and> N = AndL1 (y).N' x \<and> R = Cut <b>.M1 (y).N'
\<and> fic M a \<and> fin N x) \<or>
(\<exists>b M1 c M2 y N'. M = AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a \<and> N = AndL2 (y).N' x \<and> R = Cut <c>.M2 (y).N'
\<and> fic M a \<and> fin N x) \<or>
(\<exists>b N' z M1 y M2. M = OrR1 <b>.N' a \<and> N = OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x \<and> R = Cut <b>.N' (z).M1
\<and> fic M a \<and> fin N x) \<or>
(\<exists>b N' z M1 y M2. M = OrR2 <b>.N' a \<and> N = OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x \<and> R = Cut <b>.N' (y).M2
\<and> fic M a \<and> fin N x) \<or>
(\<exists>z b M' c N1 y N2. M = ImpR (z).<b>.M' a \<and> N = ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 x \<and>
R = Cut <b>.(Cut <c>.N1 (z).M') (y).N2 \<and> b\<sharp>(c,N1) \<and> fic M a \<and> fin N x)"
using a
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases)
apply(rule disjI1)
(* ax case *)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="b" in exI)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
(* ax case *)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="y" in exI)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(thin_tac "[a].M = [aa].Ax y aa")
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: rename_fresh)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
(* not case *)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac c="c" in alpha_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule refl)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_left)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="ca" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_left)[1]
apply(case_tac "y=x")
apply(perm_simp)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(case_tac "aa=a")
apply(perm_simp)
apply(perm_simp)
(* and1 case *)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac c="c" in alpha_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule_tac s="a" and t="[(a,c)]\<bullet>[(b,c)]\<bullet>b" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="ca" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,ca)]\<bullet>[(y,ca)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
(* and2 case *)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac c="c" in alpha_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="a" and t="[(a,c)]\<bullet>[(b,c)]\<bullet>b" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="ca" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,ca)]\<bullet>[(y,ca)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
(* or1 case *)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac c="c" in alpha_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="a" and t="[(a,c)]\<bullet>[(b,c)]\<bullet>b" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="ca" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,ca)]\<bullet>[(y,ca)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
(* or2 case *)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac c="c" in alpha_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="a" and t="[(a,c)]\<bullet>[(b,c)]\<bullet>b" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="ca" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,ca)]\<bullet>[(y,ca)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(y,cb)]\<bullet>y" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
(* imp-case *)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac c="ca" in alpha_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="a" and t="[(a,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>b" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cb" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cb)]\<bullet>[(z,cb)]\<bullet>z" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac z="cc" in alpha_name)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac s="x" and t="[(x,cc)]\<bullet>[(z,cc)]\<bullet>z" in subst)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule refl)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm abs_fresh alpha perm_fresh_fresh split: if_splits)[1]
apply(perm_simp)+
done
inductive
c_redu :: "trm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c _" [100,100] 100)
where
left[intro]: "\<lbrakk>\<not>fic M a; a\<sharp>N; x\<sharp>M\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M{a:=(x).N}"
| right[intro]: "\<lbrakk>\<not>fin N x; a\<sharp>N; x\<sharp>M\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c N{x:=<a>.M}"
equivariance c_redu
nominal_inductive c_redu
by (simp_all add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
lemma better_left[intro]:
shows "\<not>fic M a \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M{a:=(x).N}"
proof -
assume not_fic: "\<not>fic M a"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(N,M,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(a,M,N)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c ([(a',a)]\<bullet>M){a':=(x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)}" using fs1 fs2 not_fic
apply -
apply(rule left)
apply(clarify)
apply(drule_tac a'="a" in fic_rename)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)+
done
also have "\<dots> = M{a:=(x).N}" using fs1 fs2
by (simp add: subst_rename[symmetric] fresh_atm fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_right[intro]:
shows "\<not>fin N x \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c N{x:=<a>.M}"
proof -
assume not_fin: "\<not>fin N x"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(N,M,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(a,M,N)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c ([(x',x)]\<bullet>N){x':=<a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M)}" using fs1 fs2 not_fin
apply -
apply(rule right)
apply(clarify)
apply(drule_tac x'="x" in fin_rename)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)+
done
also have "\<dots> = N{x:=<a>.M}" using fs1 fs2
by (simp add: subst_rename[symmetric] fresh_atm fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma fresh_c_redu:
fixes x::"name"
and c::"coname"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M' \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M'"
and "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M' \<Longrightarrow> c\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> c\<sharp>M'"
apply -
apply(induct rule: c_redu.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh rename_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(induct rule: c_redu.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh rename_fresh subst_fresh)
done
inductive
a_redu :: "trm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a _" [100,100] 100)
where
al_redu[intro]: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M' \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
| ac_redu[intro]: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M' \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
| a_Cut_l: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>N; x\<sharp>M; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <a>.M' (x).N"
| a_Cut_r: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>N; x\<sharp>M; N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <a>.M (x).N'"
| a_NotL[intro]: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> NotL <a>.M x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a NotL <a>.M' x"
| a_NotR[intro]: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> NotR (x).M a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a NotR (x).M' a"
| a_AndR_l: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,c); b\<sharp>(M,c); b\<noteq>a; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndR <a>.M' <b>.N c"
| a_AndR_r: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,c); b\<sharp>(M,c); b\<noteq>a; N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndR <a>.M <b>.N' c"
| a_AndL1: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>y; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> AndL1 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndL1 (x).M' y"
| a_AndL2: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>y; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> AndL2 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndL2 (x).M' y"
| a_OrL_l: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z); y\<sharp>(M,z); y\<noteq>x; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrL (x).M' (y).N z"
| a_OrL_r: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z); y\<sharp>(M,z); y\<noteq>x; N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrL (x).M (y).N' z"
| a_OrR1: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>b; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> OrR1 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrR1 <a>.M' b"
| a_OrR2: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>b; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> OrR2 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrR2 <a>.M' b"
| a_ImpL_l: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>N; x\<sharp>(M,y); M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (x).N y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpL <a>.M' (x).N y"
| a_ImpL_r: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>N; x\<sharp>(M,y); N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (x).N y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpL <a>.M (x).N' y"
| a_ImpR: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>b; M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> ImpR (x).<a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpR (x).<a>.M' b"
lemma fresh_a_redu:
fixes x::"name"
and c::"coname"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M'"
and "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> c\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> c\<sharp>M'"
apply -
apply(induct rule: a_redu.induct)
apply(simp add: fresh_l_redu)
apply(simp add: fresh_c_redu)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(induct rule: a_redu.induct)
apply(simp add: fresh_l_redu)
apply(simp add: fresh_c_redu)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
done
equivariance a_redu
nominal_inductive a_redu
by (simp_all add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod abs_supp fin_supp fresh_a_redu)
lemma better_CutL_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <a>.M' (x).N"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M') (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.M' (x).N"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_CutR_intro[intro]:
shows "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N' \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <a>.M (x).N'"
proof -
assume red: "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N)"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N')" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.M (x).N'"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_AndRL_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndR <a>.M' <b>.N c"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain b'::"coname" where fs1: "b'\<sharp>(M,N,a,b,c)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a,b,c,b')" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "AndR <a>.M <b>.N c = AndR <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) <b'>.([(b',b)]\<bullet>N) c"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndR <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M') <b'>.([(b',b)]\<bullet>N) c" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = AndR <a>.M' <b>.N c"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_AndRR_intro[intro]:
shows "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N' \<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndR <a>.M <b>.N' c"
proof -
assume red: "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'"
obtain b'::"coname" where fs1: "b'\<sharp>(M,N,a,b,c)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a,b,c,b')" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "AndR <a>.M <b>.N c = AndR <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) <b'>.([(b',b)]\<bullet>N) c"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndR <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) <b'>.([(b',b)]\<bullet>N') c" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = AndR <a>.M <b>.N' c"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_AndL1_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> AndL1 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndL1 (x).M' y"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,y,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "AndL1 (x).M y = AndL1 (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) y"
using fs1 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndL1 (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M') y" using fs1 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = AndL1 (x).M' y"
using fs1 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_AndL2_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> AndL2 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndL2 (x).M' y"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,y,x)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "AndL2 (x).M y = AndL2 (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) y"
using fs1 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a AndL2 (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M') y" using fs1 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = AndL2 (x).M' y"
using fs1 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_OrLL_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrL (x).M' (y).N z"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,x,y,z)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain y'::"name" where fs2: "y'\<sharp>(M,N,x,y,z,x')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "OrL (x).M (y).N z = OrL (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) (y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>N) z"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrL (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M') (y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>N) z" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = OrL (x).M' (y).N z"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_OrLR_intro[intro]:
shows "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N' \<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrL (x).M (y).N' z"
proof -
assume red: "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,x,y,z)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain y'::"name" where fs2: "y'\<sharp>(M,N,x,y,z,x')" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "OrL (x).M (y).N z = OrL (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) (y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>N) z"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrL (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>M) (y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>N') z" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = OrL (x).M (y).N' z"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_OrR1_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> OrR1 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrR1 <a>.M' b"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain a'::"coname" where fs1: "a'\<sharp>(M,b,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "OrR1 <a>.M b = OrR1 <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) b"
using fs1 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrR1 <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M') b" using fs1 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = OrR1 <a>.M' b"
using fs1 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_OrR2_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> OrR2 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrR2 <a>.M' b"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain a'::"coname" where fs1: "a'\<sharp>(M,b,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "OrR2 <a>.M b = OrR2 <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) b"
using fs1 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a OrR2 <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M') b" using fs1 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = OrR2 <a>.M' b"
using fs1 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_ImpLL_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (x).N y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpL <a>.M' (x).N y"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,x,y)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "ImpL <a>.M (x).N y = ImpL <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N) y"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpL <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M') (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N) y" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = ImpL <a>.M' (x).N y"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_ImpLR_intro[intro]:
shows "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N' \<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (x).N y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpL <a>.M (x).N' y"
proof -
assume red: "N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N'"
obtain x'::"name" where fs1: "x'\<sharp>(M,N,x,y)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,N,a)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "ImpL <a>.M (x).N y = ImpL <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N) y"
using fs1 fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpL <a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) (x').([(x',x)]\<bullet>N') y" using fs1 fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = ImpL <a>.M (x).N' y"
using fs1 fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma better_ImpR_intro[intro]:
shows "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> ImpR (x).<a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpR (x).<a>.M' b"
proof -
assume red: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
obtain a'::"coname" where fs2: "a'\<sharp>(M,a,b)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "ImpR (x).<a>.M b = ImpR (x).<a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M) b"
using fs2 by (rule_tac sym, auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a ImpR (x).<a'>.([(a',a)]\<bullet>M') b" using fs2 red
by (auto intro: a_redu.intros simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> = ImpR (x).<a>.M' b"
using fs2 red by (auto simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_atm fresh_prod calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
text {* axioms do not reduce *}
lemma ax_do_not_l_reduce:
shows "Ax x a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M \<Longrightarrow> False"
by (erule_tac l_redu.cases) (simp_all add: trm.inject)
lemma ax_do_not_c_reduce:
shows "Ax x a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M \<Longrightarrow> False"
by (erule_tac c_redu.cases) (simp_all add: trm.inject)
lemma ax_do_not_a_reduce:
shows "Ax x a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M \<Longrightarrow> False"
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(drule ax_do_not_l_reduce)
apply(simp)
apply(drule ax_do_not_c_reduce)
apply(simp)
done
lemma a_redu_NotL_elim:
assumes a: "NotL <a>.M x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = NotL <a>.M' x \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
done
lemma a_redu_NotR_elim:
assumes a: "NotR (x).M a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = NotR (x).M' a \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
done
lemma a_redu_AndR_elim:
assumes a: "AndR <a>.M <b>.N c\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "(\<exists>M'. R = AndR <a>.M' <b>.N c \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM') \<or> (\<exists>N'. R = AndR <a>.M <b>.N' c \<and> N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aN')"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rotate_tac 6)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rotate_tac 6)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,ba)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(b,baa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
done
lemma a_redu_AndL1_elim:
assumes a: "AndL1 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = AndL1 (x).M' y \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 2)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
done
lemma a_redu_AndL2_elim:
assumes a: "AndL2 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = AndL2 (x).M' y \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 2)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
done
lemma a_redu_OrL_elim:
assumes a: "OrL (x).M (y).N z\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "(\<exists>M'. R = OrL (x).M' (y).N z \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM') \<or> (\<exists>N'. R = OrL (x).M (y).N' z \<and> N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aN')"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rotate_tac 6)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rotate_tac 6)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,ya)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,yaa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
done
lemma a_redu_OrR1_elim:
assumes a: "OrR1 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = OrR1 <a>.M' b \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 2)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
done
lemma a_redu_OrR2_elim:
assumes a: "OrR2 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = OrR2 <a>.M' b \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 2)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: perm_swap)
done
lemma a_redu_ImpL_elim:
assumes a: "ImpL <a>.M (y).N z\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "(\<exists>M'. R = ImpL <a>.M' (y).N z \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM') \<or> (\<exists>N'. R = ImpL <a>.M (y).N' z \<and> N\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aN')"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rotate_tac 5)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rotate_tac 5)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M')" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="([(y,xa)]\<bullet>N'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: perm_swap fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu)[1]
done
lemma a_redu_ImpR_elim:
assumes a: "ImpR (x).<a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = ImpR (x).<a>.M' b \<and> M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>aM'"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(rotate_tac 2)
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac l_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha a_redu.eqvt abs_perm abs_fresh)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule perm_compose)
apply(simp add: calc_atm perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule perm_compose)
apply(simp add: calc_atm perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule perm_compose)
apply(simp add: calc_atm perm_swap)
apply(rule_tac x="([(a,aaa)]\<bullet>[(x,xaa)]\<bullet>M'a)" in exI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left alpha a_redu.eqvt calc_atm fresh_a_redu perm_swap)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule perm_compose)
apply(simp add: calc_atm perm_swap)
done
text {* Transitive Closure*}
abbreviation
a_star_redu :: "trm \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* _" [100,100] 100)
where
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<equiv> (a_redu)^** M M'"
lemma a_starI:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a by blast
lemma a_starE:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
shows "M = M' \<or> (\<exists>N. M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N \<and> N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M')"
using a
by (induct) (auto)
lemma a_star_refl:
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M"
by blast
lemma a_star_trans[trans]:
assumes a1: "M1\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M2"
and a2: "M2\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M3"
shows "M1 \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M3"
using a2 a1
by (induct) (auto)
text {* congruence rules for \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* *}
lemma ax_do_not_a_star_reduce:
shows "Ax x a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M \<Longrightarrow> M = Ax x a"
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_reduce)
apply(simp)
done
lemma a_star_CutL:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.M' (x).N"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_CutR:
"N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.M (x).N'"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_Cut:
"\<lbrakk>M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'; N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.M' (x).N'"
by (blast intro!: a_star_CutL a_star_CutR intro: rtranclp_trans)
lemma a_star_NotR:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> NotR (x).M a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotR (x).M' a"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_NotL:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> NotL <a>.M x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotL <a>.M' x"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_AndRL:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndR <a>.M' <b>.N c"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_AndRR:
"N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndR <a>.M <b>.N' c"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_AndR:
"\<lbrakk>M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'; N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndR <a>.M' <b>.N' c"
by (blast intro!: a_star_AndRL a_star_AndRR intro: rtranclp_trans)
lemma a_star_AndL1:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> AndL1 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL1 (x).M' y"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_AndL2:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> AndL2 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL2 (x).M' y"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_OrLL:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrL (x).M' (y).N z"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_OrLR:
"N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrL (x).M (y).N' z"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_OrL:
"\<lbrakk>M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'; N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrL (x).M' (y).N' z"
by (blast intro!: a_star_OrLL a_star_OrLR intro: rtranclp_trans)
lemma a_star_OrR1:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> OrR1 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR1 <a>.M' b"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_OrR2:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> OrR2 <a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR2 <a>.M' b"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_ImpLL:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpL <a>.M' (y).N z"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_ImpLR:
"N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpL <a>.M (y).N' z"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemma a_star_ImpL:
"\<lbrakk>M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'; N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> ImpL <a>.M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpL <a>.M' (y).N' z"
by (blast intro!: a_star_ImpLL a_star_ImpLR intro: rtranclp_trans)
lemma a_star_ImpR:
"M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> ImpR (x).<a>.M b \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpR (x).<a>.M' b"
by (induct set: rtranclp) (blast intro: rtranclp.rtrancl_into_rtrancl)+
lemmas a_star_congs = a_star_Cut a_star_NotR a_star_NotL a_star_AndR a_star_AndL1 a_star_AndL2
a_star_OrL a_star_OrR1 a_star_OrR2 a_star_ImpL a_star_ImpR
lemma a_star_redu_NotL_elim:
assumes a: "NotL <a>.M x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = NotL <a>.M' x \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_NotL_elim)
apply(auto)
done
lemma a_star_redu_NotR_elim:
assumes a: "NotR (x).M a \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = NotR (x).M' a \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_NotR_elim)
apply(auto)
done
lemma a_star_redu_AndR_elim:
assumes a: "AndR <a>.M <b>.N c\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "(\<exists>M' N'. R = AndR <a>.M' <b>.N' c \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<and> N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N')"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_AndR_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_AndL1_elim:
assumes a: "AndL1 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = AndL1 (x).M' y \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_AndL1_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_AndL2_elim:
assumes a: "AndL2 (x).M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = AndL2 (x).M' y \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_AndL2_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_OrL_elim:
assumes a: "OrL (x).M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "(\<exists>M' N'. R = OrL (x).M' (y).N' z \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<and> N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N')"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_OrL_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_OrR1_elim:
assumes a: "OrR1 <a>.M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = OrR1 <a>.M' y \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_OrR1_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_OrR2_elim:
assumes a: "OrR2 <a>.M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = OrR2 <a>.M' y \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_OrR2_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_ImpR_elim:
assumes a: "ImpR (x).<a>.M y \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "\<exists>M'. R = ImpR (x).<a>.M' y \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_ImpR_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
lemma a_star_redu_ImpL_elim:
assumes a: "ImpL <a>.M (y).N z \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* R"
shows "(\<exists>M' N'. R = ImpL <a>.M' (y).N' z \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<and> N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N')"
using a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto)
apply(drule a_redu_ImpL_elim)
apply(auto simp add: alpha trm.inject)
done
text {* Substitution *}
lemma subst_not_fin1:
shows "\<not>fin(M{x:=<c>.P}) x"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<c>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{x:=<c>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<c>.P},P,name1,trm2{name2:=<c>.P})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
done
lemma subst_not_fin2:
assumes a: "\<not>fin M y"
shows "\<not>fin(M{c:=(x).P}) y"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x c P y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(simp add: fin.intros)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,coname1,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(simp add: fin.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(simp add: fin.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(simp add: fin.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(drule fin_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(drule freshn_after_substc)
apply(simp add: fin.intros abs_fresh)
done
lemma subst_not_fic1:
shows "\<not>fic (M{a:=(x).P}) a"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a x P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(x).P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(x).P},P,trm2{coname3:=(x).P},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(x).P},P,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)
done
lemma subst_not_fic2:
assumes a: "\<not>fic M a"
shows "\<not>fic(M{x:=<b>.P}) a"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x a P b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.P},P)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<b>.P},P,name1,trm2{x:=<b>.P},name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule freshc_after_substn)
apply(simp add: fic.intros abs_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<b>.P},trm2{name2:=<b>.P},P,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(drule fic_elims, simp)
done
text {* Reductions *}
lemma fin_l_reduce:
assumes a: "fin M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
shows "fin M' x"
using b a
apply(induct)
apply(erule fin.cases)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rotate_tac 3)
apply(erule fin.cases)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)+
done
lemma fin_c_reduce:
assumes a: "fin M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'"
shows "fin M' x"
using b a
apply(induct)
apply(erule fin.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)+
done
lemma fin_a_reduce:
assumes a: "fin M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
shows "fin M' x"
using a b
apply(induct)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_reduce)
apply(simp)
apply(drule a_redu_NotL_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_AndL1_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_AndL2_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_OrL_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_ImpL_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
done
lemma fin_a_star_reduce:
assumes a: "fin M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
shows "fin M' x"
using b a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto simp add: fin_a_reduce)
done
lemma fic_l_reduce:
assumes a: "fic M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
shows "fic M' x"
using b a
apply(induct)
apply(erule fic.cases)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rotate_tac 3)
apply(erule fic.cases)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)+
done
lemma fic_c_reduce:
assumes a: "fic M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'"
shows "fic M' x"
using b a
apply(induct)
apply(erule fic.cases, simp_all add: trm.inject)+
done
lemma fic_a_reduce:
assumes a: "fic M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
shows "fic M' x"
using a b
apply(induct)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_reduce)
apply(simp)
apply(drule a_redu_NotR_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_AndR_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_OrR1_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_OrR2_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(drule a_redu_ImpR_elim)
apply(auto)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(force simp add: abs_fresh fresh_a_redu)
done
lemma fic_a_star_reduce:
assumes a: "fic M x"
and b: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
shows "fic M' x"
using b a
apply(induct set: rtranclp)
apply(auto simp add: fic_a_reduce)
done
text {* substitution properties *}
lemma subst_with_ax1:
shows "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: x a y rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z b x a y)
show "(Ax z b){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z b)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof (cases "z=x")
case True
assume eq: "z=x"
have "(Ax z b){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = Cut <a>.Ax y a (x).Ax x b" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax x b)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by blast
finally show "Ax z b{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z b)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using eq by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "z\<noteq>x"
then show "(Ax z b){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z b)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using neq by simp
qed
next
case (Cut b M z N x a y)
have fs: "b\<sharp>x" "b\<sharp>a" "b\<sharp>y" "b\<sharp>N" "z\<sharp>x" "z\<sharp>a" "z\<sharp>y" "z\<sharp>M" by fact+
have ih1: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have ih2: "N{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
show "(Cut <b>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.M (z).N)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof (cases "M = Ax x b")
case True
assume eq: "M = Ax x b"
have "(Cut <b>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = Cut <a>.Ax y a (z).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a})" using fs eq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.Ax y a (z).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y])" using ih2 a_star_congs by blast
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) (z).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y])" using eq
by (simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_atm)
finally show "(Cut <b>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.M (z).N)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "M \<noteq> Ax x b"
have "(Cut <b>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = Cut <b>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (z).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a})"
using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <b>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) (z).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y])" using ih1 ih2 a_star_congs by blast
finally show "(Cut <b>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.M (z).N)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
qed
next
case (NotR z M b x a y)
have fs: "z\<sharp>x" "z\<sharp>a" "z\<sharp>y" "z\<sharp>b" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have "(NotR (z).M b){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = NotR (z).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) b" using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotR (z).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) b" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(NotR (z).M b){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotR (z).M b)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
next
case (NotL b M z x a y)
have fs: "b\<sharp>x" "b\<sharp>a" "b\<sharp>y" "b\<sharp>z" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
show "(NotL <b>.M z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotL <b>.M z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof(cases "z=x")
case True
assume eq: "z=x"
obtain x'::"name" where new: "x'\<sharp>(Ax y a,M{x:=<a>.Ax y a})" by (rule exists_fresh(1)[OF fs_name1])
have "(NotL <b>.M z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <a>.Ax y a (x').NotL <b>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) x')"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.Ax y a (x').NotL <b>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) x'"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotL <b>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) x')[x'\<turnstile>n>y]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(auto)
done
also have "\<dots> = NotL <b>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) y" using new by (simp add: nrename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotL <b>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) y" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (NotL <b>.M z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using eq by simp
finally show "(NotL <b>.M z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotL <b>.M z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "z\<noteq>x"
have "(NotL <b>.M z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = NotL <b>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) z" using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotL <b>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) z" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(NotL <b>.M z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotL <b>.M z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using neq by simp
qed
next
case (AndR c M d N e x a y)
have fs: "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>y" "d\<sharp>x" "d\<sharp>a" "d\<sharp>y" "d\<noteq>c" "c\<sharp>N" "c\<sharp>e" "d\<sharp>M" "d\<sharp>e" by fact+
have ih1: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have ih2: "N{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = AndR <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) <d>.(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) e"
using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndR <c>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) <d>.(N[x\<turnstile>n>y]) e" using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndR <c>.M <d>.N e)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
using fs by simp
next
case (AndL1 u M v x a y)
have fs: "u\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>y" "u\<sharp>v" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
show "(AndL1 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL1 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof(cases "v=x")
case True
assume eq: "v=x"
obtain v'::"name" where new: "v'\<sharp>(Ax y a,M{x:=<a>.Ax y a},u)" by (rule exists_fresh(1)[OF fs_name1])
have "(AndL1 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>v'. Cut <a>.Ax y a (v').AndL1 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v')"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.Ax y a (v').AndL1 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v'"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL1 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v')[v'\<turnstile>n>y]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = AndL1 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) y" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm nrename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL1 (u).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) y" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (AndL1 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(AndL1 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL1 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "v\<noteq>x"
have "(AndL1 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = AndL1 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v" using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL1 (u).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) v" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(AndL1 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL1 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs neq by simp
qed
next
case (AndL2 u M v x a y)
have fs: "u\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>y" "u\<sharp>v" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
show "(AndL2 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL2 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof(cases "v=x")
case True
assume eq: "v=x"
obtain v'::"name" where new: "v'\<sharp>(Ax y a,M{x:=<a>.Ax y a},u)" by (rule exists_fresh(1)[OF fs_name1])
have "(AndL2 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>v'. Cut <a>.Ax y a (v').AndL2 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v')"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.Ax y a (v').AndL2 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v'"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL2 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v')[v'\<turnstile>n>y]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = AndL2 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) y" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm nrename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL2 (u).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) y" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (AndL2 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(AndL2 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL2 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "v\<noteq>x"
have "(AndL2 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = AndL2 (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v" using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL2 (u).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) v" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(AndL2 (u).M v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL2 (u).M v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs neq by simp
qed
next
case (OrR1 c M d x a y)
have fs: "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>y" "c\<sharp>d" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have "(OrR1 <c>.M d){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = OrR1 <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) d" using fs by (simp add: fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR1 <c>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) d" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(OrR1 <c>.M d){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR1 <c>.M d)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
next
case (OrR2 c M d x a y)
have fs: "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>y" "c\<sharp>d" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have "(OrR2 <c>.M d){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = OrR2 <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) d" using fs by (simp add: fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR2 <c>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) d" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(OrR2 <c>.M d){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR2 <c>.M d)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
next
case (OrL u M v N z x a y)
have fs: "u\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>y" "v\<sharp>x" "v\<sharp>a" "v\<sharp>y" "v\<noteq>u" "u\<sharp>N" "u\<sharp>z" "v\<sharp>M" "v\<sharp>z" by fact+
have ih1: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have ih2: "N{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
show "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrL (u).M (v).N z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof(cases "z=x")
case True
assume eq: "z=x"
obtain z'::"name" where new: "z'\<sharp>(Ax y a,M{x:=<a>.Ax y a},N{x:=<a>.Ax y a},u,v,y,a)"
by (rule exists_fresh(1)[OF fs_name1])
have "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <a>.Ax y a (z').OrL (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (v).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) z')"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.Ax y a (z').OrL (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (v).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) z'"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrL (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (v).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) z')[z'\<turnstile>n>y]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = OrL (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (v).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) y" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm nrename_fresh subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrL (u).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) (v).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y]) y"
using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (OrL (u).M (v).N z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrL (u).M (v).N z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "z\<noteq>x"
have "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = OrL (u).(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (v).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) z"
using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrL (u).(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) (v).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y]) z"
using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrL (u).M (v).N z)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs neq by simp
qed
next
case (ImpR z c M d x a y)
have fs: "z\<sharp>x" "z\<sharp>a" "z\<sharp>y" "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>y" "z\<sharp>d" "c\<sharp>d" by fact+
have ih: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = ImpR (z).<c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) d" using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpR (z).<c>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) d" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpR (z).<c>.M d)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
next
case (ImpL c M u N v x a y)
have fs: "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>y" "u\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>y" "c\<sharp>N" "c\<sharp>v" "u\<sharp>M" "u\<sharp>v" by fact+
have ih1: "M{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
have ih2: "N{x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[x\<turnstile>n>y]" by fact
show "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpL <c>.M (u).N v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
proof(cases "v=x")
case True
assume eq: "v=x"
obtain v'::"name" where new: "v'\<sharp>(Ax y a,M{x:=<a>.Ax y a},N{x:=<a>.Ax y a},y,a,u)"
by (rule exists_fresh(1)[OF fs_name1])
have "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>v'. Cut <a>.Ax y a (v').ImpL <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (u).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v')"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.Ax y a (v').ImpL <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (u).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v'"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpL <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (u).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v')[v'\<turnstile>n>y]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = ImpL <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (u).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) y" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm trm.inject alpha rename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpL <c>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) (u).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y]) y"
using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (ImpL <c>.M (u).N v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpL <c>.M (u).N v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]" using fs by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "v\<noteq>x"
have "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} = ImpL <c>.(M{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) (u).(N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}) v"
using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpL <c>.(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) (u).(N[x\<turnstile>n>y]) v"
using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){x:=<a>.Ax y a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpL <c>.M (u).N v)[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
using fs neq by simp
qed
qed
lemma subst_with_ax2:
shows "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: b a x rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z c b a x)
show "(Ax z c){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof (cases "c=b")
case True
assume eq: "c=b"
have "(Ax z c){b:=(x).Ax x a} = Cut <b>.Ax z c (x).Ax x a" using eq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq by blast
finally show "(Ax z c){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "c\<noteq>b"
then show "(Ax z c){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Ax z c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by simp
qed
next
case (Cut c M z N b a x)
have fs: "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>N" "z\<sharp>b" "z\<sharp>a" "z\<sharp>x" "z\<sharp>M" by fact+
have ih1: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have ih2: "N{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
show "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <c>.M (z).N)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof (cases "N = Ax z b")
case True
assume eq: "N = Ax z b"
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(x).Ax x a} = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) (x).Ax x a" using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) (x).Ax x a" using ih1 a_star_congs by blast
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) (z).(N[b\<turnstile>c>a])" using eq fs
by (simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_atm)
finally show "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <c>.M (z).N)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "N \<noteq> Ax z b"
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(x).Ax x a} = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) (z).(N{b:=(x).Ax x a})"
using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) (z).(N[b\<turnstile>c>a])" using ih1 ih2 a_star_congs by blast
finally show "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <c>.M (z).N)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs by simp
qed
next
case (NotR z M c b a x)
have fs: "z\<sharp>b" "z\<sharp>a" "z\<sharp>x" "z\<sharp>c" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
show "(NotR (z).M c){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotR (z).M c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof (cases "c=b")
case True
assume eq: "c=b"
obtain a'::"coname" where new: "a'\<sharp>(Ax x a,M{b:=(x).Ax x a})" by (rule exists_fresh(2)[OF fs_coname1])
have "(NotR (z).M c){b:=(x).Ax x a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.NotR (z).M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a)"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.NotR (z).M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotR (z).(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) a')[a'\<turnstile>c>a]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp)
done
also have "\<dots> = NotR (z).(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) a" using new by (simp add: crename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotR (z).(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) a" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (NotR (z).M c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq by simp
finally show "(NotR (z).M c){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotR (z).M c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "c\<noteq>b"
have "(NotR (z).M c){b:=(x).Ax x a} = NotR (z).(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) c" using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotR (z).(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) c" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(NotR (z).M c){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotR (z).M c)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using neq by simp
qed
next
case (NotL c M z b a x)
have fs: "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>z" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have "(NotL <c>.M z){b:=(x).Ax x a} = NotL <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) z" using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* NotL <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) z" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(NotL <c>.M z){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (NotL <c>.M z)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs by simp
next
case (AndR c M d N e b a x)
have fs: "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "d\<sharp>b" "d\<sharp>a" "d\<sharp>x" "d\<noteq>c" "c\<sharp>N" "c\<sharp>e" "d\<sharp>M" "d\<sharp>e" by fact+
have ih1: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have ih2: "N{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
show "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndR <c>.M <d>.N e)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof(cases "e=b")
case True
assume eq: "e=b"
obtain e'::"coname" where new: "e'\<sharp>(Ax x a,M{b:=(x).Ax x a},N{b:=(x).Ax x a},c,d)"
by (rule exists_fresh(2)[OF fs_coname1])
have "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){b:=(x).Ax x a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>e'. Cut <e'>.AndR <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) <d>.(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) e' (x).Ax x a)"
using eq fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <e'>.AndR <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) <d>.(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) e' (x).Ax x a"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndR <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) <d>.(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) e')[e'\<turnstile>c>a]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = AndR <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) <d>.(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) a" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh crename_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndR <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) <d>.(N[b\<turnstile>c>a]) a" using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (AndR <c>.M <d>.N e)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndR <c>.M <d>.N e)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "e\<noteq>b"
have "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){b:=(x).Ax x a} = AndR <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) <d>.(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) e"
using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndR <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) <d>.(N[b\<turnstile>c>a]) e" using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(AndR <c>.M <d>.N e){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndR <c>.M <d>.N e)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
using fs neq by simp
qed
next
case (AndL1 u M v b a x)
have fs: "u\<sharp>b" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>v" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have "(AndL1 (u).M v){b:=(x).Ax x a} = AndL1 (u).(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) v" using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL1 (u).(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) v" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(AndL1 (u).M v){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL1 (u).M v)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs by simp
next
case (AndL2 u M v b a x)
have fs: "u\<sharp>b" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>v" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have "(AndL2 (u).M v){b:=(x).Ax x a} = AndL2 (u).(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) v" using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* AndL2 (u).(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) v" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(AndL2 (u).M v){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (AndL2 (u).M v)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs by simp
next
case (OrR1 c M d b a x)
have fs: "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>d" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
show "(OrR1 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR1 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof(cases "d=b")
case True
assume eq: "d=b"
obtain a'::"coname" where new: "a'\<sharp>(Ax x a,M{b:=(x).Ax x a},c,x,a)"
by (rule exists_fresh(2)[OF fs_coname1])
have "(OrR1 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR1 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a)" using fs eq by (simp)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.OrR1 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR1 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a')[a'\<turnstile>c>a]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = OrR1 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm crename_fresh subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR1 <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) a" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (OrR1 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(OrR1 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR1 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "d\<noteq>b"
have "(OrR1 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} = OrR1 <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) d" using fs neq by (simp)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR1 <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) d" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(OrR1 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR1 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs neq by simp
qed
next
case (OrR2 c M d b a x)
have fs: "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>d" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
show "(OrR2 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR2 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof(cases "d=b")
case True
assume eq: "d=b"
obtain a'::"coname" where new: "a'\<sharp>(Ax x a,M{b:=(x).Ax x a},c,x,a)"
by (rule exists_fresh(2)[OF fs_coname1])
have "(OrR2 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR2 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a)" using fs eq by (simp)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.OrR2 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR2 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a')[a'\<turnstile>c>a]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = OrR2 <c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm crename_fresh subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR2 <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) a" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (OrR2 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(OrR2 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR2 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "d\<noteq>b"
have "(OrR2 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} = OrR2 <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) d" using fs neq by (simp)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrR2 <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) d" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(OrR2 <c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrR2 <c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs neq by simp
qed
next
case (OrL u M v N z b a x)
have fs: "u\<sharp>b" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>x" "v\<sharp>b" "v\<sharp>a" "v\<sharp>x" "v\<noteq>u" "u\<sharp>N" "u\<sharp>z" "v\<sharp>M" "v\<sharp>z" by fact+
have ih1: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have ih2: "N{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){b:=(x).Ax x a} = OrL (u).(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) (v).(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) z"
using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* OrL (u).(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) (v).(N[b\<turnstile>c>a]) z" using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(OrL (u).M (v).N z){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (OrL (u).M (v).N z)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using fs by simp
next
case (ImpR z c M d b a x)
have fs: "z\<sharp>b" "z\<sharp>a" "z\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "z\<sharp>d" "c\<sharp>d" by fact+
have ih: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
show "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpR (z).<c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
proof(cases "b=d")
case True
assume eq: "b=d"
obtain a'::"coname" where new: "a'\<sharp>(Ax x a,M{b:=(x).Ax x a},x,a,c)"
by (rule exists_fresh(2)[OF fs_coname1])
have "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} =
fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.ImpR z.<c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a)" using fs eq by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a'>.ImpR z.<c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a' (x).Ax x a"
using new by (simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpR z.<c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a')[a'\<turnstile>c>a]"
using new
apply(rule_tac a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.intros)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp_all add: abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = ImpR z.<c>.M{b:=(x).Ax x a} a" using fs new
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod crename_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpR z.<c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) a" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
also have "\<dots> = (ImpR z.<c>.M b)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq fs by simp
finally show "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpR (z).<c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using eq by simp
next
case False
assume neq: "b\<noteq>d"
have "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} = ImpR (z).<c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) d" using fs neq by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpR (z).<c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) d" using ih by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(ImpR (z).<c>.M d){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpR (z).<c>.M d)[b\<turnstile>c>a]" using neq fs by simp
qed
next
case (ImpL c M u N v b a x)
have fs: "c\<sharp>b" "c\<sharp>a" "c\<sharp>x" "u\<sharp>b" "u\<sharp>a" "u\<sharp>x" "c\<sharp>N" "c\<sharp>v" "u\<sharp>M" "u\<sharp>v" by fact+
have ih1: "M{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have ih2: "N{b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N[b\<turnstile>c>a]" by fact
have "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){b:=(x).Ax x a} = ImpL <c>.(M{b:=(x).Ax x a}) (u).(N{b:=(x).Ax x a}) v"
using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* ImpL <c>.(M[b\<turnstile>c>a]) (u).(N[b\<turnstile>c>a]) v"
using ih1 ih2 by (auto intro: a_star_congs)
finally show "(ImpL <c>.M (u).N v){b:=(x).Ax x a} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (ImpL <c>.M (u).N v)[b\<turnstile>c>a]"
using fs by simp
qed
text {* substitution lemmas *}
lemma not_Ax1:
shows "\<not>(b\<sharp>M) \<Longrightarrow> M{b:=(y).Q} \<noteq> Ax x a"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: b y Q x a rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(y).Q},Q)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname:=(y).Q},Q)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(y).Q},Q,trm2{coname3:=(y).Q},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(y).Q},Q,trm2{coname3:=(y).Q},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm1{coname3:=(y).Q},Q,trm2{coname3:=(y).Q},coname1,coname2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).Q},Q,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).Q},Q,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).Q},Q,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).Q},Q,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).Q},Q,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::coname. x'\<sharp>(trm{coname2:=(y).Q},Q,coname1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
lemma not_Ax2:
shows "\<not>(x\<sharp>M) \<Longrightarrow> M{x:=<b>.Q} \<noteq> Ax y a"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: b y Q x a rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.Q},Q)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.Q},Q)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.Q},Q,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.Q},Q,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.Q},Q,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm{x:=<b>.Q},Q,name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<b>.Q},Q,trm2{x:=<b>.Q},name1,name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<b>.Q},Q,trm2{x:=<b>.Q},name1,name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{x:=<b>.Q},Q,trm2{x:=<b>.Q},name1,name2)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<b>.Q},Q,trm2{name2:=<b>.Q},name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<b>.Q},Q,trm2{name2:=<b>.Q},name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(trm1{name2:=<b>.Q},Q,trm2{name2:=<b>.Q},name1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
lemma interesting_subst1:
assumes a: "x\<noteq>y" "x\<sharp>P" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "N{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<c>.P} = N{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct N avoiding: x y c P rule: trm.induct)
case Ax
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject)
next
case (Cut d M u M' x' y' c P)
from prems show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "y'\<sharp>M")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "x'\<sharp>M")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
done
next
case NotR
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget)
next
case (NotL d M u)
then show ?case
apply (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{y:=<c>.P},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{x:=<c>.Ax y c},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},Ax y c,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndR d1 M d2 M' d3)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case (AndL1 u M d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{y:=<c>.P},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},u,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,Ax y c,M{x:=<c>.Ax y c},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},u,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndL2 u M d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{y:=<c>.P},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},u,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,Ax y c,M{x:=<c>.Ax y c},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},u,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case OrR1
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case OrR2
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case (OrL x1 M x2 M' x3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{y:=<c>.P},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},
M'{y:=<c>.P},M'{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},x1,x2,x3,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(force)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,Ax y c,M{x:=<c>.Ax y c},M{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},
M'{x:=<c>.Ax y c},M'{x:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},x1,x2,x3,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(force)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case ImpR
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case (ImpL a M x1 M' x2)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{x2:=<c>.P},M{x:=<c>.Ax x2 c}{x2:=<c>.P},
M'{x2:=<c>.P},M'{x:=<c>.Ax x2 c}{x2:=<c>.P},x1,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(force)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,Ax y c,M{x2:=<c>.Ax y c},M{x2:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},
M'{x2:=<c>.Ax y c},M'{x2:=<c>.Ax y c}{y:=<c>.P},x1,x2,x3,y,x)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
qed
lemma interesting_subst1':
assumes a: "x\<noteq>y" "x\<sharp>P" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "N{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<c>.P} = N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}{y:=<c>.P}"
proof -
show ?thesis
proof (cases "c=a")
case True then show ?thesis using a by (simp add: interesting_subst1)
next
case False then show ?thesis using a
apply -
apply(subgoal_tac "N{x:=<a>.Ax y a} = N{x:=<c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>Ax y a)}")
apply(simp add: interesting_subst1 calc_atm)
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
qed
qed
lemma interesting_subst2:
assumes a: "a\<noteq>b" "a\<sharp>P" "b\<sharp>P"
shows "N{a:=(y).P}{b:=(y).P} = N{b:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct N avoiding: a b y P rule: trm.induct)
case Ax
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject)
next
case (Cut d M u M' x' y' c P)
from prems show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(auto)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(case_tac "x'\<sharp>M'")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "y'\<sharp>M'")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax1)
done
next
case NotL
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget)
next
case (NotR u M d)
then show ?case
apply (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(b,P,M{d:=(y).P},M{b:=(y).Ax y d}{d:=(y).P},u,y)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(P,M{d:=(y).Ax y a},M{d:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P},Ax y a,y,d)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (AndR d1 M d2 M' d3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(P,M{d3:=(y).P},M{b:=(y).Ax y d3}{d3:=(y).P},
M'{d3:=(y).P},M'{b:=(y).Ax y d3}{d3:=(y).P},d1,d2,d3,b,y)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(force)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(P,Ax y a,M{d3:=(y).Ax y a},M{d3:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P},
M'{d3:=(y).Ax y a},M'{d3:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P},d1,d2,d3,y,b)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(force)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (AndL1 u M d)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case (AndL2 u M d)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case (OrR1 d M e)
then show ?case
apply (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(b,P,M{e:=(y).P},M{b:=(y).Ax y e}{e:=(y).P},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(b,P,Ax y a,M{e:=(y).Ax y a},M{e:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrR2 d M e)
then show ?case
apply (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(b,P,M{e:=(y).P},M{b:=(y).Ax y e}{e:=(y).P},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(b,P,Ax y a,M{e:=(y).Ax y a},M{e:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P},d,e)")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrL x1 M x2 M' x3)
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case ImpL
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
next
case (ImpR u e M d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm forget trm.inject subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(b,e,d,P,M{d:=(y).P},M{b:=(y).Ax y d}{d:=(y).P})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(e,d,P,Ax y a,M{d:=(y).Ax y a},M{d:=(y).Ax y a}{a:=(y).P})")
apply(erule exE, simp only: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
qed
lemma interesting_subst2':
assumes a: "a\<noteq>b" "a\<sharp>P" "b\<sharp>P"
shows "N{a:=(y).P}{b:=(y).P} = N{b:=(z).Ax z a}{a:=(y).P}"
proof -
show ?thesis
proof (cases "z=y")
case True then show ?thesis using a by (simp add: interesting_subst2)
next
case False then show ?thesis using a
apply -
apply(subgoal_tac "N{b:=(z).Ax z a} = N{b:=(y).([(y,z)]\<bullet>Ax z a)}")
apply(simp add: interesting_subst2 calc_atm)
apply(rule subst_rename)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
qed
qed
lemma subst_subst1:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(Q,b)" "x\<sharp>(y,P,Q)" "b\<sharp>Q" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "M{x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: x a P b y Q rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z c)
have fs: "a\<sharp>(Q,b)" "x\<sharp>(y,P,Q)" "b\<sharp>Q" "y\<sharp>P" by fact+
{ assume asm: "z=x \<and> c=b"
have "(Ax x b){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <a>.P (x).Ax x b){b:=(y).Q}" using fs by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q"
using fs by (simp_all add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).(Q{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" using fs by (simp add: forget)
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.Ax x b (y).Q){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using fs asm by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = (Ax x b){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using fs by simp
finally have "(Ax z c){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using asm by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "z\<noteq>x \<and> c=b"
have "(Ax z c){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}" using asm by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b>.Ax z c (y).Q" using fs asm by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <b>.(Ax z c{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (y).(Q{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})"
using fs asm by (simp add: forget)
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.Ax z c (y).Q){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using asm fs
by (auto simp add: trm.inject subst_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using asm fs by simp
finally have "(Ax z c){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "z=x \<and> c\<noteq>b"
have "(Ax z c){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <a>.P (x).Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}" using fs asm by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (x).Ax z c" using fs asm by (auto simp add: trm.inject abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = (Ax z c){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using fs asm by simp
also have "\<dots> = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using asm by auto
finally have "(Ax z c){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "z\<noteq>x \<and> c\<noteq>b"
have "(Ax z c){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Ax z c){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using asm by auto
}
ultimately show ?case by blast
next
case (Cut c M z N)
{ assume asm: "M = Ax x c \<and> N = Ax z b"
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <a>.P (z).(N{x:=<a>.P})){b:=(y).Q}"
using asm prems by simp
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.P (z).N){b:=(y).Q}" using asm prems by (simp add: fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q)" using asm prems by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
finally have eq1: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q)" by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})} = (Cut <c>.M (y).Q){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using prems asm by (simp add: fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).(Q{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" using asm prems
by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q" using asm prems by (simp add: forget)
finally have eq2: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})} = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q"
by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using eq1 eq2 by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M \<noteq> Ax x c \<and> N = Ax z b"
have neq: "M{b:=(y).Q} \<noteq> Ax x c"
proof (cases "b\<sharp>M")
case True then show ?thesis using asm by (simp add: forget)
next
case False then show ?thesis by (simp add: not_Ax1)
qed
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <c>.(M{x:=<a>.P}) (z).(N{x:=<a>.P})){b:=(y).Q}"
using asm prems by simp
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <c>.(M{x:=<a>.P}) (z).N){b:=(y).Q}" using asm prems by (simp add: fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q" using asm prems by (simp add: abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}}) (y).Q" using asm prems by simp
finally
have eq1: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}}) (y).Q"
by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})} =
(Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}) (y).Q){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using asm prems by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (y).(Q{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})"
using asm prems neq by (auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (y).Q" using asm prems by (simp add: forget)
finally have eq2: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}
= Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (y).Q" by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using eq1 eq2 by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M = Ax x c \<and> N \<noteq> Ax z b"
have neq: "N{x:=<a>.P} \<noteq> Ax z b"
proof (cases "x\<sharp>N")
case True then show ?thesis using asm by (simp add: forget)
next
case False then show ?thesis by (simp add: not_Ax2)
qed
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <a>.P (z).(N{x:=<a>.P})){b:=(y).Q}"
using asm prems by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q})" using asm prems neq
by (simp add: abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" using asm prems by simp
finally have eq1: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q}
= Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}
= (Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q})){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using asm prems by auto
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <c>.M (z).(N{b:=(y).Q})){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using asm prems by (auto simp add: fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})"
using asm prems by (simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
finally
have eq2: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}
= Cut <a>.(P{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using eq1 eq2 by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M \<noteq> Ax x c \<and> N \<noteq> Ax z b"
have neq1: "N{x:=<a>.P} \<noteq> Ax z b"
proof (cases "x\<sharp>N")
case True then show ?thesis using asm by (simp add: forget)
next
case False then show ?thesis by (simp add: not_Ax2)
qed
have neq2: "M{b:=(y).Q} \<noteq> Ax x c"
proof (cases "b\<sharp>M")
case True then show ?thesis using asm by (simp add: forget)
next
case False then show ?thesis by (simp add: not_Ax1)
qed
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <c>.(M{x:=<a>.P}) (z).(N{x:=<a>.P})){b:=(y).Q}"
using asm prems by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q})" using asm prems neq1
by (simp add: abs_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})"
using asm prems by simp
finally have eq1: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q}
= Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})} =
(Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q})){x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}" using asm neq1 prems by simp
also have "\<dots> = Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})"
using asm neq2 prems by (simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
finally have eq2: "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})} =
Cut <c>.(M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}) (z).(N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})})" by simp
have "(Cut <c>.M (z).N){x:=<a>.P}{b:=(y).Q} = (Cut <c>.M (z).N){b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.(P{b:=(y).Q})}"
using eq1 eq2 by simp
}
ultimately show ?case by blast
next
case (NotR z M c)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(M{c:=(y).Q},M{c:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{c:=(y).Q}},Q,a,P,c,y)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (NotL c M z)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{x:=<a>.P},P{b:=(y).Q},M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}},y,Q)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndR c1 M c2 N c3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(Q,M{c3:=(y).Q},M{c3:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{c3:=(y).Q}},c2,c3,a,
P{c3:=(y).Q},N{c3:=(y).Q},N{c3:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{c3:=(y).Q}},c1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (AndL1 z1 M z2)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{x:=<a>.P},P{b:=(y).Q},z1,y,Q,M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndL2 z1 M z2)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{x:=<a>.P},P{b:=(y).Q},z1,y,Q,M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (OrL z1 M z2 N z3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,M{x:=<a>.P},M{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}},z2,z3,a,y,Q,
P{b:=(y).Q},N{x:=<a>.P},N{b:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}},z1)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (OrR1 c1 M c2)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(Q,M{c2:=(y).Q},a,P{c2:=(y).Q},c1,
M{c2:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{c2:=(y).Q}})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrR2 c1 M c2)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(Q,M{c2:=(y).Q},a,P{c2:=(y).Q},c1,
M{c2:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{c2:=(y).Q}})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2 abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (ImpR z c M d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(Q,M{d:=(y).Q},a,P{d:=(y).Q},c,
M{d:=(y).Q}{x:=<a>.P{d:=(y).Q}})")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm subst_fresh forget abs_fresh)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (ImpL c M z N u)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z'::name. z'\<sharp>(P,P{b:=(y).Q},M{u:=<a>.P},N{u:=<a>.P},y,Q,
M{b:=(y).Q}{u:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}},N{b:=(y).Q}{u:=<a>.P{b:=(y).Q}},z)")
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm subst_fresh forget)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
qed
lemma subst_subst2:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(b,P,N)" "x\<sharp>(y,P,M)" "b\<sharp>(M,N)" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "M{a:=(x).N}{y:=<b>.P} = M{y:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M avoiding: a x N y b P rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z c)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
next
case (Cut d M' u M'')
then show ?case
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod trm.inject abs_fresh)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "a\<sharp>M'")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "y\<sharp>M''")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "y\<sharp>M''")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
apply(case_tac "a\<sharp>M'")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "y\<sharp>M''")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
done
next
case (NotR z M' d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(y,P,N,N{y:=<b>.P},M'{d:=(x).N},M'{y:=<b>.P}{d:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (NotL d M' z)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(z,y,P,N,N{y:=<b>.P},M'{y:=<b>.P},M'{y:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndR d M' e M'' f)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>a'::coname. a'\<sharp>(P,b,d,e,N,N{y:=<b>.P},M'{f:=(x).N},M''{f:=(x).N},
M'{y:=<b>.P}{f:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}},M''{y:=<b>.P}{f:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (AndL1 z M' u)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,b,z,u,x,N,M'{y:=<b>.P},M'{y:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndL2 z M' u)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(P,b,z,u,x,N,M'{y:=<b>.P},M'{y:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (OrL u M' v M'' w)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z'::name. z'\<sharp>(P,b,u,w,v,N,N{y:=<b>.P},M'{y:=<b>.P},M''{y:=<b>.P},
M'{y:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}},M''{y:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (OrR1 e M' f)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(P,b,e,f,x,N,N{y:=<b>.P},
M'{f:=(x).N},M'{y:=<b>.P}{f:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (OrR2 e M' f)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(P,b,e,f,x,N,N{y:=<b>.P},
M'{f:=(x).N},M'{y:=<b>.P}{f:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrR2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
done
next
case (ImpR x e M' f)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>c'::coname. c'\<sharp>(P,b,e,f,x,N,N{y:=<b>.P},
M'{f:=(x).N},M'{y:=<b>.P}{f:=(x).N{y:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpR)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm trm.inject alpha abs_fresh fin_supp abs_supp)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(2)[OF fs_coname1])
apply(simp add: fresh_atm trm.inject alpha abs_fresh fin_supp abs_supp)
done
next
case (ImpL e M' v M'' w)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget trm.inject)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>z'::name. z'\<sharp>(P,b,e,w,v,N,N{y:=<b>.P},M'{w:=<b>.P},M''{w:=<b>.P},
M'{w:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{w:=<b>.P}},M''{w:=<b>.P}{a:=(x).N{w:=<b>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
qed
lemma subst_subst3:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(P,N,c)" "c\<sharp>(M,N)" "x\<sharp>(y,P,M)" "y\<sharp>(P,x)" "M\<noteq>Ax y a"
shows "N{x:=<a>.M}{y:=<c>.P} = N{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.(M{y:=<c>.P})}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct N avoiding: x y a c M P rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z c)
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (Cut d M' u M'')
then show ?case
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod trm.inject abs_fresh)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(subgoal_tac "P \<noteq> Ax x c")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(clarify)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "x\<sharp>M'")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "y\<sharp>M'")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax2)
done
next
case NotR
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (NotL d M' u)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(y,P,M,M{y:=<c>.P},M'{x:=<a>.M},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(x,y,P,M,M'{y:=<c>.P},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_NotL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "P \<noteq> Ax x c")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: forget trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(clarify)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case AndR
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (AndL1 u M' v)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(u,y,v,P,M,M{y:=<c>.P},M'{x:=<a>.M},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(x,y,u,v,P,M,M'{y:=<c>.P},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "P \<noteq> Ax x c")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: forget trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(clarify)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case (AndL2 u M' v)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(u,y,v,P,M,M{y:=<c>.P},M'{x:=<a>.M},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(x,y,u,v,P,M,M'{y:=<c>.P},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_AndL2)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac "P \<noteq> Ax x c")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: forget trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(clarify)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case OrR1
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case OrR2
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (OrL x1 M' x2 M'' x3)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(y,P,M,M{y:=<c>.P},M'{x:=<a>.M},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}},
x1,x2,x3,M''{x:=<a>.M},M''{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(x,y,P,M,M'{y:=<c>.P},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}},
x1,x2,x3,M''{y:=<c>.P},M''{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_OrL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: forget trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
next
case ImpR
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (ImpL d M' x1 M'' x2)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(y,P,M,M{y:=<c>.P},M'{x2:=<a>.M},M'{y:=<c>.P}{x2:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}},
x1,x2,M''{x2:=<a>.M},M''{y:=<c>.P}{x2:=<a>.M{y:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
apply(subgoal_tac "\<exists>x'::name. x'\<sharp>(x,y,P,M,M'{x2:=<c>.P},M'{x2:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{x2:=<c>.P}},
x1,x2,M''{x2:=<c>.P},M''{x2:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.M{x2:=<c>.P}})")
apply(erule exE, simp add: fresh_prod)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp add: fresh_fun_simp_ImpL)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: forget trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substn.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule exists_fresh'(1)[OF fs_name1])
done
qed
lemma subst_subst4:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(P,N,y)" "y\<sharp>(M,N)" "a\<sharp>(c,P,M)" "c\<sharp>(P,a)" "M\<noteq>Ax x c"
shows "N{a:=(x).M}{c:=(y).P} = N{c:=(y).P}{a:=(x).(M{c:=(y).P})}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct N avoiding: x y a c M P rule: trm.induct)
case (Ax z c)
then show ?case
by (auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (Cut d M' u M'')
then show ?case
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod trm.inject abs_fresh)
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(subgoal_tac "P \<noteq> Ax y a")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(clarify)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "a\<sharp>M''")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax1)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod subst_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "c\<sharp>M''")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: not_Ax1)
done
next
case NotL
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (NotR u M' d)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm subst_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
next
case AndL1
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case AndL2
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (AndR d M e M' f)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
done
next
case OrL
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (OrR1 d M' e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
done
next
case (OrR2 d M' e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
done
next
case ImpL
then show ?case
by(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
next
case (ImpR u d M' e)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod forget)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha forget)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule substc.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)[1]
done
qed
text {* Reduction *}
lemma fin_not_Cut:
assumes a: "fin M x"
shows "\<not>(\<exists>a M' x N'. M = Cut <a>.M' (x).N')"
using a
by (induct) (auto)
lemma fresh_not_fin:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>M"
shows "\<not>fin M x"
proof -
have "fin M x \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> False" by (induct rule: fin.induct) (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
with a show "\<not>fin M x" by blast
qed
lemma fresh_not_fic:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>M"
shows "\<not>fic M a"
proof -
have "fic M a \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>M \<Longrightarrow> False" by (induct rule: fic.induct) (auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
with a show "\<not>fic M a" by blast
qed
lemma c_redu_subst1:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'" "c\<sharp>M" "y\<sharp>P"
shows "M{y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'{y:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct avoiding: y c P rule: c_redu.strong_induct)
case (left M a N x)
then show ?case
apply -
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(force)
apply(auto)
apply(subgoal_tac "M{a:=(x).N}{y:=<c>.P} = M{y:=<c>.P}{a:=(x).(N{y:=<c>.P})}")(*A*)
apply(simp)
apply(rule c_redu.intros)
apply(rule not_fic_subst1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_subst2)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
done
next
case (right N x a M)
then show ?case
apply -
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
(* case M = Ax y a *)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "N{x:=<a>.Ax y a}{y:=<c>.P} = N{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<c>.P}")
apply(simp)
apply(rule c_redu.right)
apply(rule not_fin_subst2)
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule interesting_subst1')
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* case M \<noteq> Ax y a*)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "N{x:=<a>.M}{y:=<c>.P} = N{y:=<c>.P}{x:=<a>.(M{y:=<c>.P})}")
apply(simp)
apply(rule c_redu.right)
apply(rule not_fin_subst2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_subst3)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
qed
lemma c_redu_subst2:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'" "c\<sharp>P" "y\<sharp>M"
shows "M{c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'{c:=(y).P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct avoiding: y c P rule: c_redu.strong_induct)
case (right N x a M)
then show ?case
apply -
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(force)
apply(auto)
apply(subgoal_tac "N{x:=<a>.M}{c:=(y).P} = N{c:=(y).P}{x:=<a>.(M{c:=(y).P})}")(*A*)
apply(simp)
apply(rule c_redu.intros)
apply(rule not_fin_subst1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_subst1)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
done
next
case (left M a N x)
then show ?case
apply -
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
(* case N = Ax x c *)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "M{a:=(x).Ax x c}{c:=(y).P} = M{c:=(y).P}{a:=(y).P}")
apply(simp)
apply(rule c_redu.left)
apply(rule not_fic_subst2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule interesting_subst2')
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* case M \<noteq> Ax y a*)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "M{a:=(x).N}{c:=(y).P} = M{c:=(y).P}{a:=(x).(N{c:=(y).P})}")
apply(simp)
apply(rule c_redu.left)
apply(rule not_fic_subst2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule subst_subst4)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
done
qed
lemma c_redu_subst1':
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'"
shows "M{y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'{y:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof -
obtain y'::"name" where fs1: "y'\<sharp>(M,M',P,P,y)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain c'::"coname" where fs2: "c'\<sharp>(M,M',P,P,c)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "M{y:=<c>.P} = ([(y',y)]\<bullet>M){y':=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)}" using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule_tac y="y'" in subst_rename(3))
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_rename(4))
apply(simp)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c ([(y',y)]\<bullet>M'){y':=<c'>.([(c',c)]\<bullet>P)}" using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule c_redu_subst1)
apply(simp add: c_redu.eqvt a)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
done
also have "\<dots> = M'{y:=<c>.P}" using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule_tac y="y'" in subst_rename(3))
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_rename(4))
apply(simp)
done
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma c_redu_subst2':
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'"
shows "M{c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'{c:=(y).P}"
using a
proof -
obtain y'::"name" where fs1: "y'\<sharp>(M,M',P,P,y)" by (rule exists_fresh(1), rule fin_supp, blast)
obtain c'::"coname" where fs2: "c'\<sharp>(M,M',P,P,c)" by (rule exists_fresh(2), rule fin_supp, blast)
have "M{c:=(y).P} = ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M){c':=(y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>P)}" using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule_tac c="c'" in subst_rename(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_rename(2))
apply(simp)
done
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c ([(c',c)]\<bullet>M'){c':=(y').([(y',y)]\<bullet>P)}" using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule c_redu_subst2)
apply(simp add: c_redu.eqvt a)
apply(simp_all add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
done
also have "\<dots> = M'{c:=(y).P}" using fs1 fs2
apply -
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule_tac c="c'" in subst_rename(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_rename(2))
apply(simp)
done
finally show ?thesis by simp
qed
lemma aux1:
assumes a: "M = M'" "M' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M''"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M''"
using a by simp
lemma aux2:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'" "M' = M''"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M''"
using a by simp
lemma aux3:
assumes a: "M = M'" "M' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M''"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M''"
using a by simp
lemma aux4:
assumes a: "M = M'"
shows "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
using a by blast
lemma l_redu_subst1:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
shows "M{y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{y:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M M' avoiding: y c P rule: l_redu.strong_induct)
case LAxR
then show ?case
apply -
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule fic_subst2)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(rule subst_comm')
apply(simp_all)
done
next
case LAxL
then show ?case
apply -
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule fin_substn_nrename)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule aux2)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule fin_subst1)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule subst_comm')
apply(simp_all)
done
next
case (LNot v M N u a b)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "N\<noteq>Ax y b"
have "(Cut <a>.NotR (u).M a (v).NotL <b>.N v){y:=<c>.P} =
(Cut <a>.NotR (u).(M{y:=<c>.P}) a (v).NotL <b>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) v)" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l (Cut <b>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(M{y:=<c>.P}))" using prems
by (auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.N (u).M){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally have ?thesis by auto
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "N=Ax y b"
have "(Cut <a>.NotR (u).M a (v).NotL <b>.N v){y:=<c>.P} =
(Cut <a>.NotR (u).(M{y:=<c>.P}) a (v).NotL <b>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) v)" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(M{y:=<c>.P}))" using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.(Cut <c>.P (y).Ax y b) (u).(M{y:=<c>.P}))" using prems
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.(P[c\<turnstile>c>b]) (u).(M{y:=<c>.P}))"
proof (cases "fic P c")
case True
assume "fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutL_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fic P c"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax2)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.N (u).M){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally have "(Cut <a>.NotR (u).M a (v).NotL <b>.N v){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.N (u).M){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LAnd1 b a1 M1 a2 M2 N z u)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "M1\<noteq>Ax y a1"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{y:=<c>.P}) <a2>.(M2{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).AndL1 (u).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a1>.(M1{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M1=Ax y a1"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{y:=<c>.P}) <a2>.(M2{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).AndL1 (u).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a1>.(M1{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a1>.(Cut <c>.P (y). Ax y a1) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a1>.P[c\<turnstile>c>a1] (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
proof (cases "fic P c")
case True
assume "fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutL_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fic P c"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax2)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LAnd2 b a1 M1 a2 M2 N z u)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "M2\<noteq>Ax y a2"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{y:=<c>.P}) <a2>.(M2{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).AndL2 (u).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a2>.(M2{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M2=Ax y a2"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{y:=<c>.P}) <a2>.(M2{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).AndL2 (u).(N{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a2>.(M2{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a2>.(Cut <c>.P (y). Ax y a2) (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a2>.P[c\<turnstile>c>a2] (u).(N{y:=<c>.P})"
proof (cases "fic P c")
case True
assume "fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutL_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fic P c"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax2)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LOr1 b a M N1 N2 z x1 x2 y c P)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "M\<noteq>Ax y a"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P}) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M=Ax y a"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P}) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.P (y). Ax y a) (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.P[c\<turnstile>c>a] (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P})"
proof (cases "fic P c")
case True
assume "fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutL_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fic P c"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax2)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LOr2 b a M N1 N2 z x1 x2 y c P)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "M\<noteq>Ax y a"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P}) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M=Ax y a"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{y:=<c>.P}) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.P (y). Ax y a) (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.P[c\<turnstile>c>a] (x2).(N2{y:=<c>.P})"
proof (cases "fic P c")
case True
assume "fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutL_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fic P c"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax2)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LImp z N u Q x M b a d y c P)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "N\<noteq>Ax y d"
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).ImpL <d>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(Q{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(M{y:=<c>.P})) (u).(Q{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a*
(Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "N=Ax y d"
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){y:=<c>.P} =
Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{y:=<c>.P}) b (z).ImpL <d>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) (u).(Q{y:=<c>.P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{y:=<c>.P}) (x).(M{y:=<c>.P})) (u).(Q{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(Cut <c>.P (y).Ax y d) (x).(M{y:=<c>.P})) (u).(Q{y:=<c>.P})"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(P[c\<turnstile>c>d]) (x).(M{y:=<c>.P})) (u).(Q{y:=<c>.P})"
proof (cases "fic P c")
case True
assume "fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutL_intro)
apply(rule a_Cut_l)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fic P c"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax2)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){y:=<c>.P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a*
(Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){y:=<c>.P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
qed
lemma l_redu_subst2:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
shows "M{c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{c:=(y).P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct M M' avoiding: y c P rule: l_redu.strong_induct)
case LAxR
then show ?case
apply -
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule fic_substc_crename)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule aux2)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule fic_subst1)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule subst_comm')
apply(simp_all)
done
next
case LAxL
then show ?case
apply -
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule fin_subst2)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(rule subst_comm')
apply(simp_all)
done
next
case (LNot v M N u a b)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "M\<noteq>Ax u c"
have "(Cut <a>.NotR (u).M a (v).NotL <b>.N v){c:=(y).P} =
(Cut <a>.NotR (u).(M{c:=(y).P}) a (v).NotL <b>.(N{c:=(y).P}) v)" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l (Cut <b>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(M{c:=(y).P}))" using prems
by (auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh)
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.N (u).M){c:=(y).P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally have ?thesis by auto
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M=Ax u c"
have "(Cut <a>.NotR (u).M a (v).NotL <b>.N v){c:=(y).P} =
(Cut <a>.NotR (u).(M{c:=(y).P}) a (v).NotL <b>.(N{c:=(y).P}) v)" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(M{c:=(y).P}))" using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Cut <c>.(Ax u c) (y).P))" using prems
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(P[y\<turnstile>n>u]))"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutR_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <b>.N (u).M){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally have "(Cut <a>.NotR (u).M a (v).NotL <b>.N v){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <b>.N (u).M){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LAnd1 b a1 M1 a2 M2 N z u)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "N\<noteq>Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) b (z).AndL1 (u).(N{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) (u).(N{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){c:=(y).P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "N=Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) b (z).AndL1 (u).(N{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) (u).(N{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Cut <c>.(Ax u c) (y).P)"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) (u).(P[y\<turnstile>n>u])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutR_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL1 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a1>.M1 (u).N){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LAnd2 b a1 M1 a2 M2 N z u)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "N\<noteq>Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) b (z).AndL2 (u).(N{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) (u).(N{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){c:=(y).P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "N=Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.(M1{c:=(y).P}) <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) b (z).AndL2 (u).(N{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) (u).(N{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Cut <c>.(Ax u c) (y).P)"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a2>.(M2{c:=(y).P}) (u).(P[y\<turnstile>n>u])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutR_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.AndR <a1>.M1 <a2>.M2 b (z).AndL2 (u).N z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a2>.M2 (u).N){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LOr1 b a M N1 N2 z x1 x2 y c P)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "N1\<noteq>Ax x1 c"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(N2{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x1).(N1{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){c:=(y).P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "N1=Ax x1 c"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(N2{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x1).(N1{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x1).(Cut <c>.(Ax x1 c) (y).P)"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x1).(P[y\<turnstile>n>x1])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutR_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR1 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x1).N1){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LOr2 b a M N1 N2 z x1 x2 y c P)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "N2\<noteq>Ax x2 c"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(N2{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(N2{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){c:=(y).P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "N2=Ax x2 c"
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).OrL (x1).(N1{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(N2{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(N2{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(Cut <c>.(Ax x2 c) (y).P)"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) (x2).(P[y\<turnstile>n>x2])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule better_CutR_intro)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.OrR2 <a>.M b (z).OrL (x1).N1 (x2).N2 z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* (Cut <a>.M (x2).N2){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
next
case (LImp z N u Q x M b a d y c P)
then show ?case
proof -
{ assume asm: "M\<noteq>Ax x c \<and> Q\<noteq>Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).ImpL <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(M{c:=(y).P})) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}" using prems
by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm)
finally
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a*
(Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M=Ax x c \<and> Q\<noteq>Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).ImpL <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(M{c:=(y).P})) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(Cut <c>.Ax x c (y).P)) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P})"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(P[y\<turnstile>n>x])) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P})"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(simp add: nrename_swap)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a*
(Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M\<noteq>Ax x c \<and> Q=Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).ImpL <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(M{c:=(y).P})) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(M{c:=(y).P})) (u).(Cut <c>.Ax u c (y).P)"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(M{c:=(y).P})) (u).(P[y\<turnstile>n>u])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: nrename_swap)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a*
(Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
moreover
{ assume asm: "M=Ax x c \<and> Q=Ax u c"
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} =
Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.(M{c:=(y).P}) b (z).ImpL <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P}) z"
using prems by (simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod)
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(M{c:=(y).P})) (u).(Q{c:=(y).P})"
using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(auto intro: l_redu.intros simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
done
also have "\<dots> = Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(Cut <c>.Ax x c (y).P)) (u).(Cut <c>.Ax u c (y).P)"
using prems by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(Cut <c>.Ax x c (y).P)) (u).(P[y\<turnstile>n>u])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.(N{c:=(y).P}) (x).(P[y\<turnstile>n>x])) (u).(P[y\<turnstile>n>u])"
proof (cases "fin P y")
case True
assume "fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
done
next
case False
assume "\<not>fin P y"
then show ?thesis using prems
apply -
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: subst_with_ax1)
done
qed
also have "\<dots> = (Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}" using prems
apply -
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm trm.inject)
apply(simp add: nrename_swap)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm trm.inject)
apply(simp add: nrename_swap)
done
finally
have "(Cut <b>.ImpR (x).<a>.M b (z).ImpL <d>.N (u).Q z){c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a*
(Cut <a>.(Cut <d>.N (x).M) (u).Q){c:=(y).P}"
by simp
}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
qed
lemma a_redu_subst1:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
shows "M{y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{y:=<c>.P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct avoiding: y c P rule: a_redu.strong_induct)
case al_redu
then show ?case by (simp only: l_redu_subst1)
next
case ac_redu
then show ?case
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.ac_redu)
apply(simp only: c_redu_subst1')
done
next
case (a_Cut_l a N x M M' y c P)
then show ?case
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_reduce)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="P" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule_tac M'="P[c\<turnstile>c>a]" in a_star_CutL)
apply(case_tac "fic P c")
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(simp)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_left)
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_with_ax2)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: crename_swap)
apply(rule impI)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case (a_Cut_r a N x M M' y c P)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_NotL
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_NotL)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_NotL)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_NotR
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_NotR)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_AndR_l
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_AndR_r
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_AndL1
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_AndL1)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_AndL1)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_AndL2
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_AndL2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_AndL2)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_OrR1
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_OrR1)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_OrR2
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_OrR2)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_OrL_l
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_OrL_r
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_ImpR
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_ImpR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_ImpL_r
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_ImpL_l
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(rule a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)
done
qed
lemma a_redu_subst2:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
shows "M{c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{c:=(y).P}"
using a
proof(nominal_induct avoiding: y c P rule: a_redu.strong_induct)
case al_redu
then show ?case by (simp only: l_redu_subst2)
next
case ac_redu
then show ?case
apply -
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule a_redu.ac_redu)
apply(simp only: c_redu_subst2')
done
next
case (a_Cut_r a N x M M' y c P)
then show ?case
apply(simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_reduce)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="P" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule_tac N'="P[y\<turnstile>n>x]" in a_star_CutR)
apply(case_tac "fin P y")
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(simp)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule ac_redu)
apply(rule better_right)
apply(simp)
apply(rule subst_with_ax1)
apply(rule aux4)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: nrename_swap)
apply(rule impI)
apply(rule a_star_CutR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case (a_Cut_l a N x M M' y c P)
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_NotR
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_NotR)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_NotR)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_NotL
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_NotL)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_AndR_l
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_AndR_r
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_AndL1
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_AndL1)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_AndL2
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_AndL2)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_OrR1
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_OrR1)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_OrR1)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_OrR2
then show ?case
apply(auto)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_OrR2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule a_star_OrR2)
apply(auto)[1]
done
next
case a_OrL_l
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_OrL_r
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_ImpR
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_fresh)
apply(rule a_star_CutL)
apply(rule a_star_ImpR)
apply(auto)
apply(rule a_star_ImpR)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_ImpL_l
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)
done
next
case a_ImpL_r
then show ?case
apply(auto simp add: subst_fresh fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)
done
qed
lemma a_star_subst1:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
shows "M{y:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{y:=<c>.P}"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(blast)
apply(drule_tac y="y" and c="c" and P="P" in a_redu_subst1)
apply(auto)
done
lemma a_star_subst2:
assumes a: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
shows "M{c:=(y).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{c:=(y).P}"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(blast)
apply(drule_tac y="y" and c="c" and P="P" in a_redu_subst2)
apply(auto)
done
text {* Candidates and SN *}
text {* SNa *}
inductive
SNa :: "trm \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
SNaI: "(\<And>M'. M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> SNa M') \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
lemma SNa_induct[consumes 1]:
assumes major: "SNa M"
assumes hyp: "\<And>M'. SNa M' \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>M''. M'\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'' \<longrightarrow> P M'' \<Longrightarrow> P M')"
shows "P M"
apply (rule major[THEN SNa.induct])
apply (rule hyp)
apply (rule SNaI)
apply (blast)+
done
lemma double_SNa_aux:
assumes a_SNa: "SNa a"
and b_SNa: "SNa b"
and hyp: "\<And>x z.
(\<And>y. x\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a y \<Longrightarrow> SNa y) \<Longrightarrow>
(\<And>y. x\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a y \<Longrightarrow> P y z) \<Longrightarrow>
(\<And>u. z\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a u \<Longrightarrow> SNa u) \<Longrightarrow>
(\<And>u. z\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a u \<Longrightarrow> P x u) \<Longrightarrow> P x z"
shows "P a b"
proof -
from a_SNa
have r: "\<And>b. SNa b \<Longrightarrow> P a b"
proof (induct a rule: SNa.induct)
case (SNaI x)
note SNa' = this
have "SNa b" by fact
thus ?case
proof (induct b rule: SNa.induct)
case (SNaI y)
show ?case
apply (rule hyp)
apply (erule SNa')
apply (erule SNa')
apply (rule SNa.SNaI)
apply (erule SNaI)+
done
qed
qed
from b_SNa show ?thesis by (rule r)
qed
lemma double_SNa:
"\<lbrakk>SNa a; SNa b; \<forall>x z. ((\<forall>y. x\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>ay \<longrightarrow> P y z) \<and> (\<forall>u. z\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a u \<longrightarrow> P x u)) \<longrightarrow> P x z\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P a b"
apply(rule_tac double_SNa_aux)
apply(assumption)+
apply(blast)
done
lemma a_preserves_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M" "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'"
shows "SNa M'"
using a
by (erule_tac SNa.cases) (simp)
lemma a_star_preserves_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M" and b: "M\<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
shows "SNa M'"
using b a
by (induct) (auto simp add: a_preserves_SNa)
lemma Ax_in_SNa:
shows "SNa (Ax x a)"
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
done
lemma NotL_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (NotL <a>.M x)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(subgoal_tac "NotL <a>.([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a) x = NotL <aa>.M'a x")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
done
lemma NotR_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (NotR (x).M a)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="NotR (x).([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a) a" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
done
lemma AndL1_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (AndL1 (x).M y)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="AndL1 x.([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a) y" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
done
lemma AndL2_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (AndL2 (x).M y)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="AndL2 x.([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a) y" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
done
lemma OrR1_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (OrR1 <a>.M b)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="OrR1 <a>.([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a) b" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
done
lemma OrR2_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (OrR2 <a>.M b)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="OrR2 <a>.([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a) b" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ImpR_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (ImpR (x).<a>.M b)"
using a
apply(induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(erule a_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule l_redu.cases, auto)
apply(erule c_redu.cases, auto)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject alpha abs_fresh abs_perm calc_atm)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="ImpR (x).<a>.([(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'a) b" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="ImpR (x).<a>.([(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a) b" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu abs_fresh abs_perm calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(simp add: a_redu.eqvt)
apply(rule_tac s="ImpR (x).<a>.([(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M'a) b" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_a_redu abs_fresh abs_perm calc_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
done
lemma AndR_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M" "SNa N"
shows "SNa (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c)"
apply(rule_tac a="M" and b="N" in double_SNa)
apply(rule a)+
apply(auto)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule a_redu_AndR_elim)
apply(auto)
done
lemma OrL_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M" "SNa N"
shows "SNa (OrL (x).M (y).N z)"
apply(rule_tac a="M" and b="N" in double_SNa)
apply(rule a)+
apply(auto)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule a_redu_OrL_elim)
apply(auto)
done
lemma ImpL_in_SNa:
assumes a: "SNa M" "SNa N"
shows "SNa (ImpL <a>.M (y).N z)"
apply(rule_tac a="M" and b="N" in double_SNa)
apply(rule a)+
apply(auto)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule a_redu_ImpL_elim)
apply(auto)
done
lemma SNa_eqvt:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "SNa M \<Longrightarrow> SNa (pi1\<bullet>M)"
and "SNa M \<Longrightarrow> SNa (pi2\<bullet>M)"
apply -
apply(induct rule: SNa.induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule_tac pi="(rev pi1)" in a_redu.eqvt(1))
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi1)\<bullet>M'" in meta_spec)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(induct rule: SNa.induct)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule_tac pi="(rev pi2)" in a_redu.eqvt(2))
apply(rotate_tac 1)
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi2)\<bullet>M'" in meta_spec)
apply(perm_simp)
done
text {* set operators *}
constdefs
AXIOMSn::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
"AXIOMSn B \<equiv> { (x):(Ax y b) | x y b. True }"
AXIOMSc::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
"AXIOMSc B \<equiv> { <a>:(Ax y b) | a y b. True }"
BINDINGn::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
"BINDINGn B X \<equiv> { (x):M | x M. \<forall>a P. <a>:P\<in>X \<longrightarrow> SNa (M{x:=<a>.P})}"
BINDINGc::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
"BINDINGc B X \<equiv> { <a>:M | a M. \<forall>x P. (x):P\<in>X \<longrightarrow> SNa (M{a:=(x).P})}"
lemma BINDINGn_decreasing:
shows "X\<subseteq>Y \<Longrightarrow> BINDINGn B Y \<subseteq> BINDINGn B X"
by (simp add: BINDINGn_def) (blast)
lemma BINDINGc_decreasing:
shows "X\<subseteq>Y \<Longrightarrow> BINDINGc B Y \<subseteq> BINDINGc B X"
by (simp add: BINDINGc_def) (blast)
consts
NOTRIGHT::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
nominal_primrec
"NOTRIGHT (NOT B) X = { <a>:NotR (x).M a | a x M. fic (NotR (x).M a) a \<and> (x):M \<in> X }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma NOTRIGHT_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(NOTRIGHT (NOT B) X)) = NOTRIGHT (NOT B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<a>:NotR (xa).M a)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma NOTRIGHT_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(NOTRIGHT (NOT B) X)) = NOTRIGHT (NOT B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<((rev pi)\<bullet>a)>:NotR ((rev pi)\<bullet>xa).((rev pi)\<bullet>M) ((rev pi)\<bullet>a)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
NOTLEFT::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
nominal_primrec
"NOTLEFT (NOT B) X = { (x):NotL <a>.M x | a x M. fin (NotL <a>.M x) x \<and> <a>:M \<in> X }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma NOTLEFT_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(NOTLEFT (NOT B) X)) = NOTLEFT (NOT B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(((rev pi)\<bullet>xa)):NotL <((rev pi)\<bullet>a)>.((rev pi)\<bullet>M) ((rev pi)\<bullet>xa)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma NOTLEFT_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(NOTLEFT (NOT B) X)) = NOTLEFT (NOT B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(((rev pi)\<bullet>xa)):NotL <((rev pi)\<bullet>a)>.((rev pi)\<bullet>M) ((rev pi)\<bullet>xa)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
ANDRIGHT::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
nominal_primrec
"ANDRIGHT (B AND C) X Y =
{ <c>:AndR <a>.M <b>.N c | c a b M N. fic (AndR <a>.M <b>.N c) c \<and> <a>:M \<in> X \<and> <b>:N \<in> Y }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma ANDRIGHT_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ANDRIGHT (A AND B) X Y)) = ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<b>:N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<c>:AndR <a>.M <b>.N c)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma ANDRIGHT_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ANDRIGHT (A AND B) X Y)) = ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<b>:N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<c>:AndR <a>.M <b>.N c)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
ANDLEFT1::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
nominal_primrec
"ANDLEFT1 (B AND C) X = { (y):AndL1 (x).M y | x y M. fin (AndL1 (x).M y) y \<and> (x):M \<in> X }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma ANDLEFT1_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) X)) = ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((y):AndL1 (xa).M y)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma ANDLEFT1_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) X)) = ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((y):AndL1 (xa).M y)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
ANDLEFT2::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
nominal_primrec
"ANDLEFT2 (B AND C) X = { (y):AndL2 (x).M y | x y M. fin (AndL2 (x).M y) y \<and> (x):M \<in> X }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma ANDLEFT2_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) X)) = ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((y):AndL2 (xa).M y)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma ANDLEFT2_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) X)) = ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((y):AndL2 (xa).M y)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
ORLEFT::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
nominal_primrec
"ORLEFT (B OR C) X Y =
{ (z):OrL (x).M (y).N z | x y z M N. fin (OrL (x).M (y).N z) z \<and> (x):M \<in> X \<and> (y):N \<in> Y }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma ORLEFT_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ORLEFT (A OR B) X Y)) = ORLEFT (A OR B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>z" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(y):N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((z):OrL (xa).M (y).N z)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>z" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma ORLEFT_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ORLEFT (A OR B) X Y)) = ORLEFT (A OR B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>z" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(y):N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((z):OrL (xa).M (y).N z)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>z" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
ORRIGHT1::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
nominal_primrec
"ORRIGHT1 (B OR C) X = { <b>:OrR1 <a>.M b | a b M. fic (OrR1 <a>.M b) b \<and> <a>:M \<in> X }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma ORRIGHT1_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) X)) = ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<b>:OrR1 <a>.M b)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma ORRIGHT1_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) X)) = ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<b>:OrR1 <a>.M b)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
ORRIGHT2::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
nominal_primrec
"ORRIGHT2 (B OR C) X = { <b>:OrR2 <a>.M b | a b M. fic (OrR2 <a>.M b) b \<and> <a>:M \<in> X }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma ORRIGHT2_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) X)) = ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<b>:OrR2 <a>.M b)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma ORRIGHT2_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) X)) = ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (pi\<bullet>X)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<b>:OrR2 <a>.M b)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
consts
IMPRIGHT::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
nominal_primrec
"IMPRIGHT (B IMP C) X Y Z U=
{ <b>:ImpR (x).<a>.M b | x a b M. fic (ImpR (x).<a>.M b) b
\<and> (\<forall>z P. x\<sharp>(z,P) \<and> (z):P \<in> Z \<longrightarrow> (x):(M{a:=(z).P}) \<in> X)
\<and> (\<forall>c Q. a\<sharp>(c,Q) \<and> <c>:Q \<in> U \<longrightarrow> <a>:(M{x:=<c>.Q}) \<in> Y)}"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma IMPRIGHT_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) X Y Z U)) = IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y) (pi\<bullet>Z) (pi\<bullet>U)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):(M{a:=((rev pi)\<bullet>z).((rev pi)\<bullet>P)})" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:(M{xb:=<((rev pi)\<bullet>c)>.((rev pi)\<bullet>Q)})" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<b>:ImpR xa.<a>.M b)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(rule_tac x="(z):P" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt fresh_right)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(rule_tac x="<c>:Q" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
done
lemma IMPRIGHT_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) X Y Z U)) = IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y) (pi\<bullet>Z) (pi\<bullet>U)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):(M{a:=((rev pi)\<bullet>z).((rev pi)\<bullet>P)})" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:(M{xb:=<((rev pi)\<bullet>c)>.((rev pi)\<bullet>Q)})" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>(<b>:ImpR xa.<a>.M b)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule_tac x="(z):P" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt fresh_right)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_right)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule_tac x="<c>:Q" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt fresh_right)
done
consts
IMPLEFT::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
nominal_primrec
"IMPLEFT (B IMP C) X Y =
{ (y):ImpL <a>.M (x).N y | x a y M N. fin (ImpL <a>.M (x).N y) y \<and> <a>:M \<in> X \<and> (x):N \<in> Y }"
apply(rule TrueI)+
done
lemma IMPLEFT_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(IMPLEFT (A IMP B) X Y)) = IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((y):ImpL <a>.M (xa).N y)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma IMPLEFT_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(IMPLEFT (A IMP B) X Y)) = IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (pi\<bullet>X) (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule_tac x="<a>:M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(xb):N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>((y):ImpL <a>.M (xa).N y)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>N" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in fin.eqvt(2))
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
done
lemma sum_cases:
shows "(\<exists>y. x=Inl y) \<or> (\<exists>y. x=Inr y)"
apply(rule_tac s="x" in sumE)
apply(auto)
done
function
NEGc::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set \<Rightarrow> ctrm set"
and
NEGn::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set \<Rightarrow> ntrm set"
where
"NEGc (PR A) X = AXIOMSc (PR A) \<union> BINDINGc (PR A) X"
| "NEGc (NOT C) X = AXIOMSc (NOT C) \<union> BINDINGc (NOT C) X
\<union> NOTRIGHT (NOT C) (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C))"
| "NEGc (C AND D) X = AXIOMSc (C AND D) \<union> BINDINGc (C AND D) X
\<union> ANDRIGHT (C AND D) (NEGc C (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C))) (NEGc D (lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D)))"
| "NEGc (C OR D) X = AXIOMSc (C OR D) \<union> BINDINGc (C OR D) X
\<union> ORRIGHT1 (C OR D) (NEGc C (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C)))
\<union> ORRIGHT2 (C OR D) (NEGc D (lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D)))"
| "NEGc (C IMP D) X = AXIOMSc (C IMP D) \<union> BINDINGc (C IMP D) X
\<union> IMPRIGHT (C IMP D) (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C)) (NEGc D (lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D)))
(lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D)) (NEGc C (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C)))"
| "NEGn (PR A) X = AXIOMSn (PR A) \<union> BINDINGn (PR A) X"
| "NEGn (NOT C) X = AXIOMSn (NOT C) \<union> BINDINGn (NOT C) X
\<union> NOTLEFT (NOT C) (NEGc C (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C)))"
| "NEGn (C AND D) X = AXIOMSn (C AND D) \<union> BINDINGn (C AND D) X
\<union> ANDLEFT1 (C AND D) (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C))
\<union> ANDLEFT2 (C AND D) (lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D))"
| "NEGn (C OR D) X = AXIOMSn (C OR D) \<union> BINDINGn (C OR D) X
\<union> ORLEFT (C OR D) (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C)) (lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D))"
| "NEGn (C IMP D) X = AXIOMSn (C IMP D) \<union> BINDINGn (C IMP D) X
\<union> IMPLEFT (C IMP D) (NEGc C (lfp (NEGn C \<circ> NEGc C))) (lfp (NEGn D \<circ> NEGc D))"
using ty_cases sum_cases
apply(auto simp add: ty.inject)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(auto simp add: ty.inject)
apply(rotate_tac 10)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(auto simp add: ty.inject)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
apply(rotate_tac 10)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(auto simp add: ty.inject)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
done
termination
apply(relation "measure (sum_case (size\<circ>fst) (size\<circ>fst))")
apply(simp_all)
done
text {* Candidates *}
lemma test1:
shows "x\<in>(X\<union>Y) = (x\<in>X \<or> x\<in>Y)"
by blast
lemma test2:
shows "x\<in>(X\<inter>Y) = (x\<in>X \<and> x\<in>Y)"
by blast
lemma big_inter_eqvt:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and X::"('a::pt_name) set set"
and pi2::"coname prm"
and Y::"('b::pt_coname) set set"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(\<Inter> X)) = \<Inter> (pi1\<bullet>X)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(\<Inter> Y)) = \<Inter> (pi2\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi1)\<bullet>x" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule ballI)
apply(drule_tac x="pi1\<bullet>xa" in spec)
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi1)\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi2)\<bullet>x" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule ballI)
apply(drule_tac x="pi2\<bullet>xa" in spec)
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi2)\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
done
lemma lfp_eqvt:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and f::"'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a::pt_name) set"
and pi2::"coname prm"
and g::"'b set \<Rightarrow> ('b::pt_coname) set"
shows "pi1\<bullet>(lfp f) = lfp (pi1\<bullet>f)"
and "pi2\<bullet>(lfp g) = lfp (pi2\<bullet>g)"
apply(simp add: lfp_def)
apply(simp add: Inf_set_eq)
apply(simp add: big_inter_eqvt)
apply(simp add: pt_Collect_eqvt[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(subgoal_tac "{u. (pi1\<bullet>f) u \<subseteq> u} = {u. ((rev pi1)\<bullet>((pi1\<bullet>f) u)) \<subseteq> ((rev pi1)\<bullet>u)}")
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule Collect_cong)
apply(rule iffI)
apply(rule subseteq_eqvt(1)[THEN iffD1])
apply(simp add: perm_bool)
apply(drule subseteq_eqvt(1)[THEN iffD2])
apply(simp add: perm_bool)
apply(simp add: lfp_def)
apply(simp add: Inf_set_eq)
apply(simp add: big_inter_eqvt)
apply(simp add: pt_Collect_eqvt[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(subgoal_tac "{u. (pi2\<bullet>g) u \<subseteq> u} = {u. ((rev pi2)\<bullet>((pi2\<bullet>g) u)) \<subseteq> ((rev pi2)\<bullet>u)}")
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule Collect_cong)
apply(rule iffI)
apply(rule subseteq_eqvt(2)[THEN iffD1])
apply(simp add: perm_bool)
apply(drule subseteq_eqvt(2)[THEN iffD2])
apply(simp add: perm_bool)
done
abbreviation
CANDn::"ty \<Rightarrow> ntrm set" ("\<parallel>'(_')\<parallel>" [60] 60)
where
"\<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<equiv> lfp (NEGn B \<circ> NEGc B)"
abbreviation
CANDc::"ty \<Rightarrow> ctrm set" ("\<parallel><_>\<parallel>" [60] 60)
where
"\<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<equiv> NEGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
lemma NEGn_decreasing:
shows "X\<subseteq>Y \<Longrightarrow> NEGn B Y \<subseteq> NEGn B X"
by (nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
(auto dest: BINDINGn_decreasing)
lemma NEGc_decreasing:
shows "X\<subseteq>Y \<Longrightarrow> NEGc B Y \<subseteq> NEGc B X"
by (nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
(auto dest: BINDINGc_decreasing)
lemma mono_NEGn_NEGc:
shows "mono (NEGn B \<circ> NEGc B)"
and "mono (NEGc B \<circ> NEGn B)"
proof -
have "\<forall>X Y. X\<subseteq>Y \<longrightarrow> NEGn B (NEGc B X) \<subseteq> NEGn B (NEGc B Y)"
proof (intro strip)
fix X::"ntrm set" and Y::"ntrm set"
assume "X\<subseteq>Y"
then have "NEGc B Y \<subseteq> NEGc B X" by (simp add: NEGc_decreasing)
then show "NEGn B (NEGc B X) \<subseteq> NEGn B (NEGc B Y)" by (simp add: NEGn_decreasing)
qed
then show "mono (NEGn B \<circ> NEGc B)" by (simp add: mono_def)
next
have "\<forall>X Y. X\<subseteq>Y \<longrightarrow> NEGc B (NEGn B X) \<subseteq> NEGc B (NEGn B Y)"
proof (intro strip)
fix X::"ctrm set" and Y::"ctrm set"
assume "X\<subseteq>Y"
then have "NEGn B Y \<subseteq> NEGn B X" by (simp add: NEGn_decreasing)
then show "NEGc B (NEGn B X) \<subseteq> NEGc B (NEGn B Y)" by (simp add: NEGc_decreasing)
qed
then show "mono (NEGc B \<circ> NEGn B)" by (simp add: mono_def)
qed
lemma NEG_simp:
shows "\<parallel><B>\<parallel> = NEGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and "\<parallel>(B)\<parallel> = NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
proof -
show "\<parallel><B>\<parallel> = NEGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by simp
next
have "\<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<equiv> lfp (NEGn B \<circ> NEGc B)" by simp
then have "\<parallel>(B)\<parallel> = (NEGn B \<circ> NEGc B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" using mono_NEGn_NEGc def_lfp_unfold by blast
then show "\<parallel>(B)\<parallel> = NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by simp
qed
lemma NEG_elim:
shows "M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> M \<in> NEGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and "N \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> N \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using NEG_simp by (blast)+
lemma NEG_intro:
shows "M \<in> NEGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
and "N \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> N \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
using NEG_simp by (blast)+
lemma NEGc_simps:
shows "NEGc (PR A) (\<parallel>(PR A)\<parallel>) = AXIOMSc (PR A) \<union> BINDINGc (PR A) (\<parallel>(PR A)\<parallel>)"
and "NEGc (NOT C) (\<parallel>(NOT C)\<parallel>) = AXIOMSc (NOT C) \<union> BINDINGc (NOT C) (\<parallel>(NOT C)\<parallel>)
\<union> (NOTRIGHT (NOT C) (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>))"
and "NEGc (C AND D) (\<parallel>(C AND D)\<parallel>) = AXIOMSc (C AND D) \<union> BINDINGc (C AND D) (\<parallel>(C AND D)\<parallel>)
\<union> (ANDRIGHT (C AND D) (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><D>\<parallel>))"
and "NEGc (C OR D) (\<parallel>(C OR D)\<parallel>) = AXIOMSc (C OR D) \<union> BINDINGc (C OR D) (\<parallel>(C OR D)\<parallel>)
\<union> (ORRIGHT1 (C OR D) (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>)) \<union> (ORRIGHT2 (C OR D) (\<parallel><D>\<parallel>))"
and "NEGc (C IMP D) (\<parallel>(C IMP D)\<parallel>) = AXIOMSc (C IMP D) \<union> BINDINGc (C IMP D) (\<parallel>(C IMP D)\<parallel>)
\<union> (IMPRIGHT (C IMP D) (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><D>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(D)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>))"
by (simp_all only: NEGc.simps)
lemma AXIOMS_in_CANDs:
shows "AXIOMSn B \<subseteq> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and "AXIOMSc B \<subseteq> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
proof -
have "AXIOMSn B \<subseteq> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
by (nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct) (auto)
then show "AXIOMSn B \<subseteq> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" using NEG_simp by blast
next
have "AXIOMSc B \<subseteq> NEGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
by (nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct) (auto)
then show "AXIOMSc B \<subseteq> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" using NEG_simp by blast
qed
lemma Ax_in_CANDs:
shows "(y):Ax x a \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
and "<b>:Ax x a \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
proof -
have "(y):Ax x a \<in> AXIOMSn B" by (auto simp add: AXIOMSn_def)
also have "AXIOMSn B \<subseteq> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" by (rule AXIOMS_in_CANDs)
finally show "(y):Ax x a \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" by simp
next
have "<b>:Ax x a \<in> AXIOMSc B" by (auto simp add: AXIOMSc_def)
also have "AXIOMSc B \<subseteq> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" by (rule AXIOMS_in_CANDs)
finally show "<b>:Ax x a \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" by simp
qed
lemma AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "M \<in> AXIOMSn B \<Longrightarrow> (pi\<bullet>M) \<in> AXIOMSn B"
and "N \<in> AXIOMSc B \<Longrightarrow> (pi\<bullet>N) \<in> AXIOMSc B"
apply(auto simp add: AXIOMSn_def AXIOMSc_def)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(simp)
done
lemma AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "M \<in> AXIOMSn B \<Longrightarrow> (pi\<bullet>M) \<in> AXIOMSn B"
and "N \<in> AXIOMSc B \<Longrightarrow> (pi\<bullet>N) \<in> AXIOMSc B"
apply(auto simp add: AXIOMSn_def AXIOMSc_def)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>b" in exI)
apply(simp)
done
lemma AXIOMS_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>AXIOMSn B) = AXIOMSn B"
and "(pi\<bullet>AXIOMSc B) = AXIOMSc B"
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1a[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_name(1))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_name(1))
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1a[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_name(2))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_name(2))
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
done
lemma AXIOMS_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>AXIOMSn B) = AXIOMSn B"
and "(pi\<bullet>AXIOMSc B) = AXIOMSc B"
apply(auto)
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1a[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_coname(1))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_coname(1))
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1a[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule_tac pi="pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_coname(2))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="rev pi" in AXIOMS_eqvt_aux_coname(2))
apply(simp add: pt_set_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
done
lemma BINDING_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(BINDINGn B X)) = BINDINGn B (pi\<bullet>X)"
and "(pi\<bullet>(BINDINGc B Y)) = BINDINGc B (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: BINDINGn_def BINDINGc_def perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac ?pi1.0="pi" in SNa_eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi\<bullet>xa):(rev pi\<bullet>M)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(force)
apply(drule_tac ?pi1.0="rev pi" in SNa_eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac ?pi1.0="pi" in SNa_eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="<(rev pi\<bullet>a)>:(rev pi\<bullet>M)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(force)
apply(drule_tac ?pi1.0="rev pi" in SNa_eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
done
lemma BINDING_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(BINDINGn B X)) = BINDINGn B (pi\<bullet>X)"
and "(pi\<bullet>(BINDINGc B Y)) = BINDINGc B (pi\<bullet>Y)"
apply(auto simp add: BINDINGn_def BINDINGc_def perm_set_eq)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>xb" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac ?pi2.0="pi" in SNa_eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="(rev pi\<bullet>xa):(rev pi\<bullet>M)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>xa" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(force)
apply(drule_tac ?pi2.0="rev pi" in SNa_eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(rev pi)\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac ?pi2.0="pi" in SNa_eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
apply(rule_tac x="<(rev pi\<bullet>a)>:(rev pi\<bullet>M)" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="rev pi\<bullet>M" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="pi\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(force)
apply(drule_tac ?pi2.0="rev pi" in SNa_eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
done
lemma CAND_eqvt_name:
fixes pi::"name prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and "(pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
proof (nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
case (PR X)
{ case 1 show ?case
apply -
apply(simp add: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp add: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp add: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name)
apply(perm_simp)
done
next
case 2 show ?case
apply -
apply(simp only: NEGc_simps)
apply(simp add: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name)
apply(simp add: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp add: comp_def)
apply(simp add: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp add: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name)
apply(perm_simp)
done
}
next
case (NOT B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name NOTRIGHT_eqvt_name NOTLEFT_eqvt_name)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name NOTRIGHT_eqvt_name ih1 ih2 g)
}
next
case (AND A B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih3: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih4: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name ANDRIGHT_eqvt_name
ANDLEFT2_eqvt_name ANDLEFT1_eqvt_name)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name
ANDRIGHT_eqvt_name ANDLEFT1_eqvt_name ANDLEFT2_eqvt_name ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4 g)
}
next
case (OR A B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih3: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih4: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name ORRIGHT1_eqvt_name
ORRIGHT2_eqvt_name ORLEFT_eqvt_name)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name
ORRIGHT1_eqvt_name ORRIGHT2_eqvt_name ORLEFT_eqvt_name ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4 g)
}
next
case (IMP A B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih3: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih4: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name IMPRIGHT_eqvt_name IMPLEFT_eqvt_name)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_name BINDING_eqvt_name
IMPRIGHT_eqvt_name IMPLEFT_eqvt_name ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4 g)
}
qed
lemma CAND_eqvt_coname:
fixes pi::"coname prm"
shows "(pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and "(pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
proof (nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
case (PR X)
{ case 1 show ?case
apply -
apply(simp add: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp add: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp add: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname)
apply(perm_simp)
done
next
case 2 show ?case
apply -
apply(simp only: NEGc_simps)
apply(simp add: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp add: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp add: comp_def)
apply(simp add: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp add: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname)
apply(perm_simp)
done
}
next
case (NOT B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname
NOTRIGHT_eqvt_coname NOTLEFT_eqvt_coname)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname
NOTRIGHT_eqvt_coname ih1 ih2 g)
}
next
case (AND A B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih3: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih4: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname ANDRIGHT_eqvt_coname
ANDLEFT2_eqvt_coname ANDLEFT1_eqvt_coname)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname
ANDRIGHT_eqvt_coname ANDLEFT1_eqvt_coname ANDLEFT2_eqvt_coname ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4 g)
}
next
case (OR A B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih3: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih4: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname ORRIGHT1_eqvt_coname
ORRIGHT2_eqvt_coname ORLEFT_eqvt_coname)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname
ORRIGHT1_eqvt_coname ORRIGHT2_eqvt_coname ORLEFT_eqvt_coname ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4 g)
}
next
case (IMP A B)
have ih1: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih2: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih3: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by fact
have ih4: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) = (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by fact
have g: "pi\<bullet>(\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>) = (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(simp only: lfp_eqvt)
apply(simp only: comp_def)
apply(simp only: perm_fun_def [where 'a="ntrm \<Rightarrow> bool"])
apply(simp only: NEGc.simps NEGn.simps)
apply(simp only: union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname IMPRIGHT_eqvt_coname
IMPLEFT_eqvt_coname)
apply(perm_simp add: ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4)
done
{ case 1 show ?case by (rule g)
next
case 2 show ?case
by (simp only: NEGc_simps union_eqvt AXIOMS_eqvt_coname BINDING_eqvt_coname
IMPRIGHT_eqvt_coname IMPLEFT_eqvt_coname ih1 ih2 ih3 ih4 g)
}
qed
text {* Elimination rules for the set-operators *}
lemma BINDINGc_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "\<forall>x P. ((x):P)\<in>(\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<longrightarrow> SNa (M{a:=(x).P})"
using a
apply(auto simp add: BINDINGc_def)
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac ?pi2.0="[(a,aa)]" in SNa_eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp add: csubst_eqvt)
done
lemma BINDINGn_elim:
assumes a: "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
shows "\<forall>c P. (<c>:P)\<in>(\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<longrightarrow> SNa (M{x:=<c>.P})"
using a
apply(auto simp add: BINDINGn_def)
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject alpha)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule_tac ?pi1.0="[(x,xa)]" in SNa_eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt)
done
lemma NOTRIGHT_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> NOTRIGHT (NOT B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
obtains x' M' where "M = NotR (x').M' a" and "fic (NotR (x').M' a) a" and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
done
lemma NOTLEFT_elim:
assumes a: "(x):M \<in> NOTLEFT (NOT B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
obtains a' M' where "M = NotL <a'>.M' x" and "fin (NotL <a'>.M' x) x" and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ANDRIGHT_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> ANDRIGHT (B AND C) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>)"
obtains d' M' e' N' where "M = AndR <d'>.M' <e'>.N' a" and "fic (AndR <d'>.M' <e'>.N' a) a"
and "<d'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" and "<e'>:N' \<in> (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" and x="<a>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "c=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,c)]" and x="<aa>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "c=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and x="<a>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" and x="<a>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "aa=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "c=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,b)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,c)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "c=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,aa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,aa)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "aa=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(b,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,c)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "c=b")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,c)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" and x="<b>:N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ANDLEFT1_elim:
assumes a: "(x):M \<in> ANDLEFT1 (B AND C) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
obtains x' M' where "M = AndL1 (x').M' x" and "fin (AndL1 (x').M' x) x" and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "y=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ANDLEFT2_elim:
assumes a: "(x):M \<in> ANDLEFT2 (B AND C) (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>)"
obtains x' M' where "M = AndL2 (x').M' x" and "fin (AndL2 (x').M' x) x" and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "y=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ORRIGHT1_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> ORRIGHT1 (B OR C) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
obtains a' M' where "M = OrR1 <a'>.M' a" and "fic (OrR1 <a'>.M' a) a" and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "b=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ORRIGHT2_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> ORRIGHT2 (B OR C) (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>)"
obtains a' M' where "M = OrR2 <a'>.M' a" and "fic (OrR2 <a'>.M' a) a" and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "b=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp)
done
lemma ORLEFT_elim:
assumes a: "(x):M \<in> ORLEFT (B OR C) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>)"
obtains y' M' z' N' where "M = OrL (y').M' (z').N' x" and "fin (OrL (y').M' (z').N' x) x"
and "(y'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" and "(z'):N' \<in> (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" and x="(x):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "z=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,z)]" and x="(xa):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "z=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="(x):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" and x="(x):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "xa=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "z=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,z)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "z=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,xa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,xa)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "xa=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(y,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(y,z)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "z=y")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,z)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" and x="(y):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
done
lemma IMPRIGHT_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> IMPRIGHT (B IMP C) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><C>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
obtains x' a' M' where "M = ImpR (x').<a'>.M' a" and "fic (ImpR (x').<a'>.M' a) a"
and "\<forall>z P. x'\<sharp>(z,P) \<and> (z):P \<in> \<parallel>(C)\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> (x'):(M'{a':=(z).P}) \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
and "\<forall>c Q. a'\<sharp>(c,Q) \<and> <c>:Q \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> <a'>:(M'{x':=<c>.Q}) \<in> \<parallel><C>\<parallel>"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="(x):M{a:=(z).([(a,b)]\<bullet>P)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm csubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(rotate_tac 2)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="<a>:M{x:=<([(a,b)]\<bullet>c)>.([(a,b)]\<bullet>Q)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="(x):M{a:=(z).([(a,b)]\<bullet>P)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm csubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="<a>:M{x:=<([(a,b)]\<bullet>c)>.([(a,b)]\<bullet>Q)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "b=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and x="(x):M{aa:=(z).([(a,aa)]\<bullet>P)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm csubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and x="<aa>:M{x:=<([(a,aa)]\<bullet>c)>.([(a,aa)]\<bullet>Q)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="(x):M{aa:=(z).([(a,b)]\<bullet>P)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm csubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,b)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" and x="<aa>:M{x:=<([(a,b)]\<bullet>c)>.([(a,b)]\<bullet>Q)}"
in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: nsubst_eqvt CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
done
lemma IMPLEFT_elim:
assumes a: "(x):M \<in> IMPLEFT (B IMP C) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(C)\<parallel>)"
obtains x' a' M' N' where "M = ImpL <a'>.M' (x').N' x" and "fin (ImpL <a'>.M' (x').N' x) x"
and "<a'>:M' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" and "(x'):N' \<in> \<parallel>(C)\<parallel>"
using a
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject alpha abs_fresh calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(x):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" and x="(xa):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "y=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="<a>:M" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="(xa):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>M" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(x,y)]\<bullet>N" in meta_spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(xa):N" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(simp)
done
lemma CANDs_alpha:
shows "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> [a].M = [b].N \<Longrightarrow> <b>:N \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
and "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> [x].M = [y].N \<Longrightarrow> (y):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
apply(auto simp add: alpha)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
done
lemma CAND_NotR_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:NotR (x).M a \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "<a>:NotR (x).M a \<notin> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B'. B = NOT B' \<and> (x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(B')\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSc_def ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
done
lemma CAND_NotL_elim_aux:
assumes a: "(x):NotL <a>.M x \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "(x):NotL <a>.M x \<notin> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B'. B = NOT B' \<and> <a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B'>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSn_def ntrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
done
lemmas CAND_NotL_elim = CAND_NotL_elim_aux[OF NEG_elim(2)]
lemma CAND_AndR_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:AndR <b>.M <c>.N a \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "<a>:AndR <b>.M <c>.N a \<notin> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 AND B2 \<and> <b>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B1>\<parallel>) \<and> <c>:N \<in> (\<parallel><B2>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSc_def ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<a>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<a>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<a>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "a=ba")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,ca)]" and x="<ba>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "ca=ba")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and x="<ba>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<ba>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ca)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "ca=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<a>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ca)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "ca=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "a=ba")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,ca)]" and x="<ba>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "ca=ba")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and x="<ba>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and x="<ba>:Na" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
done
lemma CAND_OrR1_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:OrR1 <b>.M a \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "<a>:OrR1 <b>.M a \<notin> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 OR B2 \<and> <b>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B1>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSc_def ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ba)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "ba=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
done
lemma CAND_OrR2_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:OrR2 <b>.M a \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "<a>:OrR2 <b>.M a \<notin> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 OR B2 \<and> <b>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B2>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSc_def ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ba)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "ba=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_coname calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
done
lemma CAND_OrL_elim_aux:
assumes a: "(x):(OrL (y).M (z).N x) \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "(x):(OrL (y).M (z).N x) \<notin> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 OR B2 \<and> (y):M \<in> (\<parallel>(B1)\<parallel>) \<and> (z):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B2)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSn_def ntrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(x):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(x):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(x):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "x=ya")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ya,za)]" and x="(ya):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "za=ya")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ya)]" and x="(ya):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(ya):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,za)]" and x="(xa):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "za=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="(xa):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(xa):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(x):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,za)]" and x="(xa):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "za=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="(xa):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(xa):Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "x=ya")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ya,za)]" and x="(ya):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "za=ya")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ya)]" and x="(ya):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,za)]" and x="(ya):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
done
lemmas CAND_OrL_elim = CAND_OrL_elim_aux[OF NEG_elim(2)]
lemma CAND_AndL1_elim_aux:
assumes a: "(x):(AndL1 (y).M x) \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "(x):(AndL1 (y).M x) \<notin> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 AND B2 \<and> (y):M \<in> (\<parallel>(B1)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSn_def ntrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ya)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ya)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "ya=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ya)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
done
lemmas CAND_AndL1_elim = CAND_AndL1_elim_aux[OF NEG_elim(2)]
lemma CAND_AndL2_elim_aux:
assumes a: "(x):(AndL2 (y).M x) \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "(x):(AndL2 (y).M x) \<notin> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 AND B2 \<and> (y):M \<in> (\<parallel>(B2)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSn_def ntrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ya)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ya)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(case_tac "ya=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ya)]" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(auto simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm intro: CANDs_alpha)
done
lemmas CAND_AndL2_elim = CAND_AndL2_elim_aux[OF NEG_elim(2)]
lemma CAND_ImpL_elim_aux:
assumes a: "(x):(ImpL <a>.M (z).N x) \<in> NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "(x):(ImpL <a>.M (z).N x) \<notin> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 IMP B2 \<and> <a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B1>\<parallel>) \<and> (z):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B2)\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSn_def ntrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(x):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="<aa>:Ma" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "x=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,y)]" and x="(xa):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "y=xa")
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" and x="(xa):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" and x="(xa):Nb" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name calc_atm)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha)[1]
done
lemmas CAND_ImpL_elim = CAND_ImpL_elim_aux[OF NEG_elim(2)]
lemma CAND_ImpR_elim:
assumes a: "<a>:ImpR (x).<b>.M a \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "<a>:ImpR (x).<b>.M a \<notin> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "\<exists>B1 B2. B = B1 IMP B2 \<and>
(\<forall>z P. x\<sharp>(z,P) \<and> (z):P \<in> \<parallel>(B2)\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> (x):(M{b:=(z).P}) \<in> \<parallel>(B1)\<parallel>) \<and>
(\<forall>c Q. b\<sharp>(c,Q) \<and> <c>:Q \<in> \<parallel><B1>\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> <b>:(M{x:=<c>.Q}) \<in> \<parallel><B2>\<parallel>)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp_all add: ty.inject AXIOMSc_def ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(auto intro: CANDs_alpha simp add: trm.inject calc_atm abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod fresh_bij)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="ca" and z="c" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(aa,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(aa,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="cb" and z="ca" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(aa,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(aa,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="ca" and z="c" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(ba,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(ba,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="cb" and z="ca" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(ba,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(ba,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="ca" and z="c" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(ba,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(ba,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ba)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ba)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "ba=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="ca" and z="c" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(a,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(a,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="ca" and z="c" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(aa,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,c)]\<bullet>[(aa,ca)]\<bullet>[(b,ca)]\<bullet>[(x,c)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty2)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,ca)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,c)]" and X="\<parallel>(ty1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="cb" and z="ca" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(ba,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(aa,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(ba,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ba)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,ba)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ba,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "ba=aa")
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="cb" and z="ca" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(a,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(a,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(drule_tac a="cb" and z="ca" in alpha_name_coname)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(aa,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(a,ba)]\<bullet>[(xa,ca)]\<bullet>[(aa,cb)]\<bullet>[(b,cb)]\<bullet>[(x,ca)]\<bullet>Q" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel><ty1>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,ba)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(xa,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(aa,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(b,cb)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,ca)]" and X="\<parallel><ty2>\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(perm_simp add: CAND_eqvt_name CAND_eqvt_coname csubst_eqvt nsubst_eqvt)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
done
text {* Main lemma 1 *}
lemma AXIOMS_imply_SNa:
shows "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc B \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
and "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn B \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
apply -
apply(auto simp add: AXIOMSn_def AXIOMSc_def ntrm.inject ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(rule Ax_in_SNa)+
done
lemma BINDING_imply_SNa:
shows "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
and "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
apply -
apply(auto simp add: BINDINGn_def BINDINGc_def ntrm.inject ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="Ax x a" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
apply(drule a_star_preserves_SNa)
apply(rule subst_with_ax2)
apply(simp add: crename_id)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="Ax x aa" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
apply(drule a_star_preserves_SNa)
apply(rule subst_with_ax2)
apply(simp add: crename_id SNa_eqvt)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="Ax x a" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
apply(drule a_star_preserves_SNa)
apply(rule subst_with_ax1)
apply(simp add: nrename_id)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="Ax xa a" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
apply(drule a_star_preserves_SNa)
apply(rule subst_with_ax1)
apply(simp add: nrename_id SNa_eqvt)
done
lemma CANDs_imply_SNa:
shows "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
and "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M"
proof(induct B arbitrary: a x M rule: ty.weak_induct)
case (PR X)
{ case 1
have "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (PR X) \<union> BINDINGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (PR X)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
next
case 2
have "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (PR X) \<union> BINDINGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (PR X)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
}
next
case (NOT B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
{ case 1
have "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><NOT B>\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (NOT B) (\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (NOT B) \<union> BINDINGc (NOT B) (\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>) \<union> NOTRIGHT (NOT B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (NOT B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (NOT B) (\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> NOTRIGHT (NOT B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain x' M' where eq: "M = NotR (x').M' a" and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
using NOTRIGHT_elim by blast
then have "SNa M'" using ih2 by blast
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: NotR_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
next
case 2
have "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(NOT B)\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (NOT B) (\<parallel><NOT B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (NOT B) \<union> BINDINGn (NOT B) (\<parallel><NOT B>\<parallel>) \<union> NOTLEFT (NOT B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
by (simp only: NEGn.simps)
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (NOT B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (NOT B) (\<parallel><NOT B>\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> NOTLEFT (NOT B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' M' where eq: "M = NotL <a'>.M' x" and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using NOTLEFT_elim by blast
then have "SNa M'" using ih1 by blast
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: NotL_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
}
next
case (AND A B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih3: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih4: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
{ case 1
have "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A AND B) \<union> BINDINGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)
\<union> ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A AND B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' M' b' N' where eq: "M = AndR <a'>.M' <b'>.N' a"
and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" and "<b'>:N' \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
by (erule_tac ANDRIGHT_elim, blast)
then have "SNa M'" and "SNa N'" using ih1 ih3 by blast+
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: AndR_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
next
case 2
have "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A AND B) \<union> BINDINGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)
\<union> ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) \<union> ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
by (simp only: NEGn.simps)
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A AND B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)"
then obtain x' M' where eq: "M = AndL1 (x').M' x" and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)"
using ANDLEFT1_elim by blast
then have "SNa M'" using ih2 by blast
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: AndL1_in_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain x' M' where eq: "M = AndL2 (x').M' x" and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
using ANDLEFT2_elim by blast
then have "SNa M'" using ih4 by blast
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: AndL2_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
}
next
case (OR A B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih3: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih4: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
{ case 1
have "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A OR B) \<union> BINDINGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)
\<union> ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) \<union> ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A OR B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' M' where eq: "M = OrR1 <a'>.M' a"
and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)"
by (erule_tac ORRIGHT1_elim, blast)
then have "SNa M'" using ih1 by blast
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: OrR1_in_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' M' where eq: "M = OrR2 <a'>.M' a" and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using ORRIGHT2_elim by blast
then have "SNa M'" using ih3 by blast
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: OrR2_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
next
case 2
have "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A OR B) \<union> BINDINGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)
\<union> ORLEFT (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
by (simp only: NEGn.simps)
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A OR B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> ORLEFT (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain x' M' y' N' where eq: "M = OrL (x').M' (y').N' x"
and "(x'):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" and "(y'):N' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
by (erule_tac ORLEFT_elim, blast)
then have "SNa M'" and "SNa N'" using ih2 ih4 by blast+
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: OrL_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
}
next
case (IMP A B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih3: "\<And>a M. <a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
have ih4: "\<And>x M. (x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> SNa M" by fact
{ case 1
have "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A IMP B) \<union> BINDINGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)
\<union> IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A IMP B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)"
then obtain x' a' M' where eq: "M = ImpR (x').<a'>.M' a"
and imp: "\<forall>z P. x'\<sharp>(z,P) \<and> (z):P \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> (x'):(M'{a':=(z).P}) \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>"
by (erule_tac IMPRIGHT_elim, blast)
obtain z::"name" where fs: "z\<sharp>x'" by (rule_tac exists_fresh, rule fin_supp, blast)
have "(z):Ax z a'\<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" by (simp add: Ax_in_CANDs)
with imp fs have "(x'):(M'{a':=(z).Ax z a'}) \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" by (simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
then have "SNa (M'{a':=(z).Ax z a'})" using ih2 by blast
moreover
have "M'{a':=(z).Ax z a'} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'[a'\<turnstile>c>a']" by (simp add: subst_with_ax2)
ultimately have "SNa (M'[a'\<turnstile>c>a'])" by (simp add: a_star_preserves_SNa)
then have "SNa M'" by (simp add: crename_id)
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: ImpR_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
next
case 2
have "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A IMP B) \<union> BINDINGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)
\<union> IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
by (simp only: NEGn.simps)
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A IMP B)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp add: AXIOMS_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)"
then have "SNa M" by (simp only: BINDING_imply_SNa)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' M' y' N' where eq: "M = ImpL <a'>.M' (y').N' x"
and "<a'>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" and "(y'):N' \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
by (erule_tac IMPLEFT_elim, blast)
then have "SNa M'" and "SNa N'" using ih1 ih4 by blast+
then have "SNa M" using eq by (simp add: ImpL_in_SNa)
}
ultimately show "SNa M" by blast
}
qed
text {* Main lemma 2 *}
lemma AXIOMS_preserved:
shows "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc B \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc B"
and "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn B \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn B"
apply(simp_all add: AXIOMSc_def AXIOMSn_def)
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject ctrm.inject alpha)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_star_reduce)
apply(auto)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_star_reduce)
apply(auto)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_star_reduce)
apply(auto)
apply(drule ax_do_not_a_star_reduce)
apply(auto)
done
lemma BINDING_preserved:
shows "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
proof -
assume red: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
assume asm: "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
{
fix x::"name" and P::"trm"
from asm have "((x):P) \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> SNa (M{a:=(x).P})" by (simp add: BINDINGc_elim)
moreover
have "M{a:=(x).P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{a:=(x).P}" using red by (simp add: a_star_subst2)
ultimately
have "((x):P) \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> SNa (M'{a:=(x).P})" by (simp add: a_star_preserves_SNa)
}
then show "<a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by (auto simp add: BINDINGc_def)
next
assume red: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'"
assume asm: "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
{
fix c::"coname" and P::"trm"
from asm have "(<c>:P) \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> SNa (M{x:=<c>.P})" by (simp add: BINDINGn_elim)
moreover
have "M{x:=<c>.P} \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'{x:=<c>.P}" using red by (simp add: a_star_subst1)
ultimately
have "(<c>:P) \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> SNa (M'{x:=<c>.P})" by (simp add: a_star_preserves_SNa)
}
then show "(x):M' \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by (auto simp add: BINDINGn_def)
qed
lemma CANDs_preserved:
shows "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
and "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M' \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
proof(nominal_induct B arbitrary: a x M M' rule: ty.induct)
case (PR X)
{ case 1
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (PR X) \<union> BINDINGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (PR X)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (PR X)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp add: BINDING_preserved)
}
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (PR X) \<union> BINDINGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "<a>:M' \<in> NEGc (PR X) (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "<a>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
next
case 2
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (PR X) \<union> BINDINGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (PR X)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (PR X)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> BINDINGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (PR X) \<union> BINDINGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "(x):M' \<in> NEGn (PR X) (\<parallel><PR X>\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "(x):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(PR X)\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
}
next
case (IMP A B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" by fact
have ih3: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih4: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" by fact
{ case 1
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A IMP B) \<union> BINDINGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)
\<union> IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A IMP B)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (A IMP B)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)"
then obtain x' a' N' where eq: "M = ImpR (x').<a'>.N' a" and fic: "fic (ImpR (x').<a'>.N' a) a"
and imp1: "\<forall>z P. x'\<sharp>(z,P) \<and> (z):P \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> (x'):(N'{a':=(z).P}) \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>"
and imp2: "\<forall>c Q. a'\<sharp>(c,Q) \<and> <c>:Q \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> <a'>:(N'{x':=<c>.Q}) \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
using IMPRIGHT_elim by blast
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = ImpR (x').<a'>.N'' a" and red: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_ImpR_elim by (blast)
from imp1 have "\<forall>z P. x'\<sharp>(z,P) \<and> (z):P \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> (x'):(N''{a':=(z).P}) \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" using red ih2
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="P" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac a_star_subst2)
apply(blast)
done
moreover
from imp2 have "\<forall>c Q. a'\<sharp>(c,Q) \<and> <c>:Q \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel> \<longrightarrow> <a'>:(N''{x':=<c>.Q}) \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" using red ih3
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="Q" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac a_star_subst1)
apply(blast)
done
moreover
from fic have "fic M' a" using eq asm by (simp add: fic_a_star_reduce)
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" using eq' by auto
}
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (A IMP B) \<union> BINDINGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)
\<union> IMPRIGHT (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "<a>:M' \<in> NEGc (A IMP B) (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "<a>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
next
case 2
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A IMP B) \<union> BINDINGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)
\<union> IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A IMP B)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (A IMP B)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> BINDINGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' T' y' N' where eq: "M = ImpL <a'>.T' (y').N' x"
and fin: "fin (ImpL <a'>.T' (y').N' x) x"
and imp1: "<a'>:T' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" and imp2: "(y'):N' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
by (erule_tac IMPLEFT_elim, blast)
from eq asm obtain T'' N'' where eq': "M' = ImpL <a'>.T'' (y').N'' x"
and red1: "T' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* T''" and red2: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_ImpL_elim by blast
from fin have "fin M' x" using eq asm by (simp add: fin_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp1 red1 have "<a'>:T'' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" using ih1 by simp
moreover
from imp2 red2 have "(y'):N'' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" using ih4 by simp
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (A IMP B) \<union> BINDINGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)
\<union> IMPLEFT (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "(x):M' \<in> NEGn (A IMP B) (\<parallel><A IMP B>\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "(x):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(A IMP B)\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
}
next
case (AND A B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" by fact
have ih3: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih4: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" by fact
{ case 1
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A AND B) \<union> BINDINGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)
\<union> ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A AND B)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (A AND B)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' T' b' N' where eq: "M = AndR <a'>.T' <b'>.N' a"
and fic: "fic (AndR <a'>.T' <b'>.N' a) a"
and imp1: "<a'>:T' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" and imp2: "<b'>:N' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
using ANDRIGHT_elim by blast
from eq asm obtain T'' N'' where eq': "M' = AndR <a'>.T'' <b'>.N'' a"
and red1: "T' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* T''" and red2: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_AndR_elim by blast
from fic have "fic M' a" using eq asm by (simp add: fic_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp1 red1 have "<a'>:T'' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" using ih1 by simp
moreover
from imp2 red2 have "<b'>:N'' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" using ih3 by simp
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (A AND B) \<union> BINDINGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)
\<union> ANDRIGHT (A AND B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "<a>:M' \<in> NEGc (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "<a>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
next
case 2
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A AND B) \<union> BINDINGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)
\<union> ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) \<union> ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A AND B)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (A AND B)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> BINDINGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)"
then obtain y' N' where eq: "M = AndL1 (y').N' x"
and fin: "fin (AndL1 (y').N' x) x" and imp: "(y'):N' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>"
by (erule_tac ANDLEFT1_elim, blast)
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = AndL1 (y').N'' x" and red1: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_AndL1_elim by blast
from fin have "fin M' x" using eq asm by (simp add: fin_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp red1 have "(y'):N'' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" using ih2 by simp
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain y' N' where eq: "M = AndL2 (y').N' x"
and fin: "fin (AndL2 (y').N' x) x" and imp: "(y'):N' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
by (erule_tac ANDLEFT2_elim, blast)
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = AndL2 (y').N'' x" and red1: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_AndL2_elim by blast
from fin have "fin M' x" using eq asm by (simp add: fin_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp red1 have "(y'):N'' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" using ih4 by simp
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (A AND B) \<union> BINDINGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)
\<union> ANDLEFT1 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) \<union> ANDLEFT2 (A AND B) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "(x):M' \<in> NEGn (A AND B) (\<parallel><A AND B>\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "(x):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(A AND B)\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
}
next
case (OR A B)
have ih1: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" by fact
have ih3: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih4: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" by fact
{ case 1
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A OR B) \<union> BINDINGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)
\<union> ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) \<union> ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (A OR B)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (A OR B)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' N' where eq: "M = OrR1 <a'>.N' a"
and fic: "fic (OrR1 <a'>.N' a) a" and imp1: "<a'>:N' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>"
using ORRIGHT1_elim by blast
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = OrR1 <a'>.N'' a" and red1: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_OrR1_elim by blast
from fic have "fic M' a" using eq asm by (simp add: fic_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp1 red1 have "<a'>:N'' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" using ih1 by simp
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' N' where eq: "M = OrR2 <a'>.N' a"
and fic: "fic (OrR2 <a'>.N' a) a" and imp1: "<a'>:N' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
using ORRIGHT2_elim by blast
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = OrR2 <a'>.N'' a" and red1: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_OrR2_elim by blast
from fic have "fic M' a" using eq asm by (simp add: fic_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp1 red1 have "<a'>:N'' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>" using ih3 by simp
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (A OR B) \<union> BINDINGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)
\<union> ORRIGHT1 (A OR B) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>) \<union> ORRIGHT2 (A OR B) (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "<a>:M' \<in> NEGc (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "<a>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
next
case 2
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A OR B) \<union> BINDINGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)
\<union> ORLEFT (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (A OR B)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (A OR B)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> BINDINGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> ORLEFT (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
then obtain y' T' z' N' where eq: "M = OrL (y').T' (z').N' x"
and fin: "fin (OrL (y').T' (z').N' x) x"
and imp1: "(y'):T' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" and imp2: "(z'):N' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
by (erule_tac ORLEFT_elim, blast)
from eq asm obtain T'' N'' where eq': "M' = OrL (y').T'' (z').N'' x"
and red1: "T' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* T''" and red2: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_OrL_elim by blast
from fin have "fin M' x" using eq asm by (simp add: fin_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp1 red1 have "(y'):T'' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" using ih2 by simp
moreover
from imp2 red2 have "(z'):N'' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>" using ih4 by simp
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> ORLEFT (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (A OR B) \<union> BINDINGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)
\<union> ORLEFT (A OR B) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>) (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "(x):M' \<in> NEGn (A OR B) (\<parallel><A OR B>\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "(x):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(A OR B)\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
}
next
case (NOT A)
have ih1: "\<And>a M M'. \<lbrakk><a>:M \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" by fact
have ih2: "\<And>x M M'. \<lbrakk>(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>; M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" by fact
{ case 1
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>" by fact
then have "<a>:M \<in> NEGc (NOT A) (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)" by simp
then have "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (NOT A) \<union> BINDINGc (NOT A) (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)
\<union> NOTRIGHT (NOT A) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc (NOT A)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (NOT A)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc (NOT A) (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)"
then have "<a>:M' \<in> BINDINGc (NOT A) (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "<a>:M \<in> NOTRIGHT (NOT A) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)"
then obtain y' N' where eq: "M = NotR (y').N' a"
and fic: "fic (NotR (y').N' a) a" and imp: "(y'):N' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>"
using NOTRIGHT_elim by blast
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = NotR (y').N'' a" and red: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_NotR_elim by blast
from fic have "fic M' a" using eq asm by (simp add: fic_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp red have "(y'):N'' \<in> \<parallel>(A)\<parallel>" using ih2 by simp
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> NOTRIGHT (NOT A) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "<a>:M' \<in> AXIOMSc (NOT A) \<union> BINDINGc (NOT A) (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)
\<union> NOTRIGHT (NOT A) (\<parallel>(A)\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "<a>:M' \<in> NEGc (NOT A) (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "<a>:M' \<in> (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
next
case 2
have asm: "M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M'" by fact
have "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>" by fact
then have "(x):M \<in> NEGn (NOT A) (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
then have "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (NOT A) \<union> BINDINGn (NOT A) (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)
\<union> NOTLEFT (NOT A) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by simp
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn (NOT A)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (NOT A)" using asm by (simp only: AXIOMS_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> BINDINGn (NOT A) (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)"
then have "(x):M' \<in> BINDINGn (NOT A) (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)" using asm by (simp only: BINDING_preserved)
}
moreover
{ assume "(x):M \<in> NOTLEFT (NOT A) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)"
then obtain a' N' where eq: "M = NotL <a'>.N' x"
and fin: "fin (NotL <a'>.N' x) x" and imp: "<a'>:N' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>"
by (erule_tac NOTLEFT_elim, blast)
from eq asm obtain N'' where eq': "M' = NotL <a'>.N'' x" and red1: "N' \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* N''"
using a_star_redu_NotL_elim by blast
from fin have "fin M' x" using eq asm by (simp add: fin_a_star_reduce)
moreover
from imp red1 have "<a'>:N'' \<in> \<parallel><A>\<parallel>" using ih1 by simp
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> NOTLEFT (NOT A) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" using eq' by (simp, blast)
}
ultimately have "(x):M' \<in> AXIOMSn (NOT A) \<union> BINDINGn (NOT A) (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)
\<union> NOTLEFT (NOT A) (\<parallel><A>\<parallel>)" by blast
then have "(x):M' \<in> NEGn (NOT A) (\<parallel><NOT A>\<parallel>)" by simp
then show "(x):M' \<in> (\<parallel>(NOT A)\<parallel>)" using NEG_simp by blast
}
qed
lemma CANDs_preserved_single:
shows "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> <a>:M' \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
and "(x):M \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel> \<Longrightarrow> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M' \<Longrightarrow> (x):M' \<in> \<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
by (auto simp add: a_starI CANDs_preserved)
lemma fic_CANDS:
assumes a: "\<not>fic M a"
and b: "<a>:M \<in> \<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
shows "<a>:M \<in> AXIOMSc B \<or> <a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
using a b
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,c)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ctrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,b)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
lemma fin_CANDS_aux:
assumes a: "\<not>fin M x"
and b: "(x):M \<in> (NEGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>))"
shows "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn B \<or> (x):M \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using a b
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,z)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: ntrm.inject)[1]
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,y)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
lemma fin_CANDS:
assumes a: "\<not>fin M x"
and b: "(x):M \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "(x):M \<in> AXIOMSn B \<or> (x):M \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
apply(rule fin_CANDS_aux)
apply(rule a)
apply(rule NEG_elim)
apply(rule b)
done
lemma BINDING_implies_CAND:
shows "<c>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> <c>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
and "(x):N \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>) \<Longrightarrow> (x):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
apply -
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(rule NEG_intro)
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(auto)
done
text {* 3rd Main Lemma *}
lemma Cut_a_redu_elim:
assumes a: "Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a R"
shows "(\<exists>M'. R = Cut <a>.M' (x).N \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M') \<or>
(\<exists>N'. R = Cut <a>.M (x).N' \<and> N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N') \<or>
(Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c R) \<or>
(Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l R)"
using a
apply(erule_tac a_redu.cases)
apply(simp_all)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule_tac x="[(a,aa)]\<bullet>M'" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>N'" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_a_redu)
apply(rule_tac x="[(x,xa)]\<bullet>N'" in exI)
apply(perm_simp add: fresh_left calc_atm a_redu.eqvt fresh_a_redu)
done
lemma Cut_c_redu_elim:
assumes a: "Cut <a>.M (x).N \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c R"
shows "(R = M{a:=(x).N} \<and> \<not>fic M a) \<or>
(R = N{x:=<a>.M} \<and> \<not>fin N x)"
using a
apply(erule_tac c_redu.cases)
apply(simp_all)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(auto simp add: alpha)[1]
apply(simp add: subst_rename fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: subst_rename fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_rename fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(a,aa)]" in fic.eqvt(2))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(auto simp add: alpha)[1]
apply(simp add: subst_rename fresh_atm)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: subst_rename fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: subst_rename fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(x,xa)]" in fin.eqvt(1))
apply(perm_simp)
done
lemma not_fic_crename_aux:
assumes a: "fic M c" "c\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "fic (M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) c"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fic_elims intro!: fic.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh)
done
lemma not_fic_crename:
assumes a: "\<not>(fic (M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) c)" "c\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "\<not>(fic M c)"
using a
apply(auto dest: not_fic_crename_aux)
done
lemma not_fin_crename_aux:
assumes a: "fin M y"
shows "fin (M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) y"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fin_elims intro!: fin.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh)
done
lemma not_fin_crename:
assumes a: "\<not>(fin (M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) y)"
shows "\<not>(fin M y)"
using a
apply(auto dest: not_fin_crename_aux)
done
lemma crename_fresh_interesting1:
fixes c::"coname"
assumes a: "c\<sharp>(M[a\<turnstile>c>b])" "c\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "c\<sharp>M"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma crename_fresh_interesting2:
fixes x::"name"
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(M[a\<turnstile>c>b])"
shows "x\<sharp>M"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
done
lemma fic_crename:
assumes a: "fic (M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) c" "c\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "fic M c"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fic_elims intro!: fic.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh
split: if_splits)
apply(auto dest: crename_fresh_interesting1 simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma fin_crename:
assumes a: "fin (M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) x"
shows "fin M x"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fin_elims intro!: fin.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh
split: if_splits)
apply(auto dest: crename_fresh_interesting2 simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma crename_Cut:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = Cut <c>.M (x).N" "c\<sharp>(a,b,N,R)" "x\<sharp>(M,R)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = Cut <c>.M' (x).N' \<and> M'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> x\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c x M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_NotR:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = NotR (x).N c" "x\<sharp>R" "c\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = NotR (x).N' c) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_NotR':
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = NotR (x).N c" "x\<sharp>R" "c\<sharp>a"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = NotR (x).N' c) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N) \<or> (\<exists>N'. (R = NotR (x).N' a) \<and> b=c \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh alpha trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_NotR_aux:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = NotR (x).N c"
shows "(a=c \<and> a=b) \<or> (a\<noteq>c)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_NotL:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = NotL <c>.N y" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = NotL <c>.N' y) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c y N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_AndL1:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = AndL1 (x).N y" "x\<sharp>R"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = AndL1 (x).N' y) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b x y N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_AndL2:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = AndL2 (x).N y" "x\<sharp>R"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = AndL2 (x).N' y) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b x y N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_AndR_aux:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = AndR <c>.M <d>.N e"
shows "(a=e \<and> a=b) \<or> (a\<noteq>e)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d e M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_AndR:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = AndR <c>.M <d>.N e" "c\<sharp>(a,b,d,e,N,R)" "d\<sharp>(a,b,c,e,M,R)" "e\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = AndR <c>.M' <d>.N' e \<and> M'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> d\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d e M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname2,d)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname2,d)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname2,d)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_AndR':
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = AndR <c>.M <d>.N e" "c\<sharp>(a,b,d,e,N,R)" "d\<sharp>(a,b,c,e,M,R)" "e\<sharp>a"
shows "(\<exists>M' N'. R = AndR <c>.M' <d>.N' e \<and> M'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> d\<sharp>M') \<or>
(\<exists>M' N'. R = AndR <c>.M' <d>.N' a \<and> b=e \<and> M'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> d\<sharp>M')"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d e M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)[1]
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)[1]
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)[1]
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm trm.inject alpha)[1]
apply(case_tac "coname3=a")
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname2,d)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm trm.inject alpha split: if_splits)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[a\<turnstile>c>e]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname2,d)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm trm.inject alpha split: if_splits)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_OrR1_aux:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrR1 <c>.M e"
shows "(a=e \<and> a=b) \<or> (a\<noteq>e)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c e M rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_OrR1:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrR1 <c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)" "d\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = OrR1 <c>.N' d) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_OrR1':
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrR1 <c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)" "d\<sharp>a"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = OrR1 <c>.N' d) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N) \<or>
(\<exists>N'. (R = OrR1 <c>.N' a) \<and> b=d \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_OrR2_aux:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrR2 <c>.M e"
shows "(a=e \<and> a=b) \<or> (a\<noteq>e)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c e M rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_OrR2:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrR2 <c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)" "d\<sharp>(a,b)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = OrR2 <c>.N' d) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_OrR2':
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrR2 <c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)" "d\<sharp>a"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = OrR2 <c>.N' d) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N) \<or>
(\<exists>N'. (R = OrR2 <c>.N' a) \<and> b=d \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_OrL:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = OrL (x).M (y).N z" "x\<sharp>(y,z,N,R)" "y\<sharp>(x,z,M,R)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = OrL (x).M' (y).N' z \<and> M'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N \<and> x\<sharp>N' \<and> y\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b x y z M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name2,y)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,x)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,x)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(name2,y)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_ImpL:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ImpL <c>.M (y).N z" "c\<sharp>(a,b,N,R)" "y\<sharp>(z,M,R)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = ImpL <c>.M' (y).N' z \<and> M'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = M \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> y\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b c y z M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,y)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,y)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[a\<turnstile>c>b]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_ImpR_aux:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ImpR (x).<c>.M e"
shows "(a=e \<and> a=b) \<or> (a\<noteq>e)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x a b c e M rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_ImpR:
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ImpR (x).<c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)" "d\<sharp>(a,b)" "x\<sharp>R"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = ImpR (x).<c>.N' d) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: a b x c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>[(coname1, c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_supp fin_supp abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_ImpR':
assumes a: "R[a\<turnstile>c>b] = ImpR (x).<c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,a,b)" "x\<sharp>R" "d\<sharp>a"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = ImpR (x).<c>.N' d) \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N) \<or>
(\<exists>N'. (R = ImpR (x).<c>.N' a) \<and> b=d \<and> N'[a\<turnstile>c>b] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x a b c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject abs_perm calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma crename_ax2:
assumes a: "N[a\<turnstile>c>b] = Ax x c"
shows "\<exists>d. N = Ax x d"
using a
apply(nominal_induct N avoiding: a b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma crename_interesting1:
assumes a: "distinct [a,b,c]"
shows "M[a\<turnstile>c>c][c\<turnstile>c>b] = M[c\<turnstile>c>b][a\<turnstile>c>b]"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a c b rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: rename_fresh simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(blast)
apply(rotate_tac 12)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
done
lemma crename_interesting2:
assumes a: "a\<noteq>c" "a\<noteq>d" "a\<noteq>b" "c\<noteq>d" "b\<noteq>c"
shows "M[a\<turnstile>c>b][c\<turnstile>c>d] = M[c\<turnstile>c>d][a\<turnstile>c>b]"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a c b d rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: rename_fresh simp add: trm.inject alpha)
done
lemma crename_interesting3:
shows "M[a\<turnstile>c>c][x\<turnstile>n>y] = M[x\<turnstile>n>y][a\<turnstile>c>c]"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a c x y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: rename_fresh simp add: trm.inject alpha)
done
lemma crename_credu:
assumes a: "(M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'"
shows "\<exists>M0. M0[a\<turnstile>c>b]=M' \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M0"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M\<equiv>"M[a\<turnstile>c>b]" M' avoiding: M a b rule: c_redu.strong_induct)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x="M'{a:=(x).N'}" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_comm fresh_prod)
apply(rule c_redu.intros)
apply(auto dest: not_fic_crename)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x="N'{x:=<a>.M'}" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_comm fresh_prod)
apply(rule c_redu.intros)
apply(auto dest: not_fin_crename)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
done
lemma crename_lredu:
assumes a: "(M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
shows "\<exists>M0. M0[a\<turnstile>c>b]=M' \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M0"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M\<equiv>"M[a\<turnstile>c>b]" M' avoiding: M a b rule: l_redu.strong_induct)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(case_tac "aa=ba")
apply(simp add: crename_id)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(assumption)
apply(frule crename_ax2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "d=aa")
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="M'[a\<turnstile>c>aa]" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule crename_interesting1)
apply(simp)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto dest: fic_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="M'[a\<turnstile>c>b]" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule crename_interesting2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto dest: fic_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(case_tac "aa=b")
apply(simp add: crename_id)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(assumption)
apply(frule crename_ax2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "d=aa")
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="N'[x\<turnstile>n>y]" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_interesting3)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* LNot *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_NotR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_NotL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <b>.N'b (x).N'a" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LAnd1 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_AndR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_AndL1)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a1>.M'a (x).N'a" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LAnd2 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_AndR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_AndL2)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a2>.N'b (x).N'a" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LOr1 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_OrL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_OrR1)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.N' (x1).M'a" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LOr2 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_OrL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_OrR2)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.N' (x2).N'a" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* ImpL *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_ImpL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_ImpR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.M'a (x).N') (y).N'a" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: crename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
done
lemma crename_aredu:
assumes a: "(M[a\<turnstile>c>b]) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'" "a\<noteq>b"
shows "\<exists>M0. M0[a\<turnstile>c>b]=M' \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M0"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M\<equiv>"M[a\<turnstile>c>b]" M' avoiding: M a b rule: a_redu.strong_induct)
apply(simp)
apply(drule crename_lredu)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(drule crename_credu)
apply(blast)
(* Cut *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.M0 (x).N'" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule crename_fresh_interesting2)
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.M' (x).M0" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule crename_fresh_interesting1)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
(* NotL *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_NotL)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="NotL <a>.M0 x" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* NotR *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule crename_NotR_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_NotR')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="NotR (x).M0 a" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="NotR (x).M0 aa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* AndR *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule crename_AndR_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_AndR')
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ba" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndR <a>.M0 <b>.N' c" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndR <a>.M0 <b>.N' aa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule crename_AndR_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_AndR')
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ba" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndR <a>.M' <b>.M0 c" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndR <a>.M' <b>.M0 aa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
(* AndL1 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_AndL1)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndL1 (x).M0 y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* AndL2 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_AndL2)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndL2 (x).M0 y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* OrL *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_OrL)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrL (x).M0 (y).N' z" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_OrL)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrL (x).M' (y).M0 z" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* OrR1 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule crename_OrR1_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_OrR1')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ba" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrR1 <a>.M0 b" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrR1 <a>.M0 aa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* OrR2 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule crename_OrR2_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_OrR2')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ba" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrR2 <a>.M0 b" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrR2 <a>.M0 aa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* ImpL *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_ImpL)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpL <a>.M0 (x).N' y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule crename_ImpL)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpL <a>.M' (x).M0 y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
(* ImpR *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule crename_ImpR_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule crename_ImpR')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ba" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpR (x).<a>.M0 b" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="aa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpR (x).<a>.M0 aa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
done
lemma SNa_preserved_renaming1:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "SNa (M[a\<turnstile>c>b])"
using a
apply(induct rule: SNa_induct)
apply(case_tac "a=b")
apply(simp add: crename_id)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule crename_aredu)
apply(blast)+
done
lemma nrename_interesting1:
assumes a: "distinct [x,y,z]"
shows "M[x\<turnstile>n>z][z\<turnstile>n>y] = M[z\<turnstile>n>y][x\<turnstile>n>y]"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y z rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: rename_fresh simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(blast)
apply(blast)
apply(rotate_tac 12)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(blast)
apply(rotate_tac 11)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(blast)
done
lemma nrename_interesting2:
assumes a: "x\<noteq>z" "x\<noteq>u" "x\<noteq>y" "z\<noteq>u" "y\<noteq>z"
shows "M[x\<turnstile>n>y][z\<turnstile>n>u] = M[z\<turnstile>n>u][x\<turnstile>n>y]"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y z u rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: rename_fresh simp add: trm.inject alpha)
done
lemma not_fic_nrename_aux:
assumes a: "fic M c"
shows "fic (M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) c"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c x y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fic_elims intro!: fic.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh)
done
lemma not_fic_nrename:
assumes a: "\<not>(fic (M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) c)"
shows "\<not>(fic M c)"
using a
apply(auto dest: not_fic_nrename_aux)
done
lemma fin_nrename:
assumes a: "fin M z" "z\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "fin (M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) z"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y z rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fin_elims intro!: fin.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh
split: if_splits)
done
lemma nrename_fresh_interesting1:
fixes z::"name"
assumes a: "z\<sharp>(M[x\<turnstile>n>y])" "z\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "z\<sharp>M"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y z rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
done
lemma nrename_fresh_interesting2:
fixes c::"coname"
assumes a: "c\<sharp>(M[x\<turnstile>n>y])"
shows "c\<sharp>M"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)
done
lemma fin_nrename2:
assumes a: "fin (M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) z" "z\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "fin M z"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x y z rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fin_elims intro!: fin.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh
split: if_splits)
apply(auto dest: nrename_fresh_interesting1 simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
lemma nrename_Cut:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = Cut <c>.M (z).N" "c\<sharp>(N,R)" "z\<sharp>(x,y,M,R)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = Cut <c>.M' (z).N' \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> z\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: c y x z M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: alpha fresh_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,z)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_NotR:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = NotR (z).N c" "z\<sharp>(R,x,y)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = NotR (z).N' c) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x y c z N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,z)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_NotL:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = NotL <c>.N z" "c\<sharp>R" "z\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = NotL <c>.N' z) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x y c z N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_NotL':
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = NotL <c>.N u" "c\<sharp>R" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = NotL <c>.N' u) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N) \<or> (\<exists>N'. (R = NotL <c>.N' x) \<and> y=u \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y u c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh alpha trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_NotL_aux:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = NotL <c>.N u"
shows "(x=u \<and> x=y) \<or> (x\<noteq>u)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y u c x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma nrename_AndL1:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndL1 (z).N u" "z\<sharp>(R,x,y)" "u\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = AndL1 (z).N' u) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: z u x y N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,z)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_AndL1':
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndL1 (v).N u" "v\<sharp>(R,u,x,y)" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = AndL1 (v).N' u) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N) \<or> (\<exists>N'. (R = AndL1 (v).N' x) \<and> y=u \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y u v x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh alpha trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,v)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,v)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_AndL1_aux:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndL1 (v).N u"
shows "(x=u \<and> x=y) \<or> (x\<noteq>u)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y u v x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma nrename_AndL2:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndL2 (z).N u" "z\<sharp>(R,x,y)" "u\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = AndL2 (z).N' u) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: z u x y N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,z)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_AndL2':
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndL2 (v).N u" "v\<sharp>(R,u,x,y)" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "(\<exists>N'. (R = AndL2 (v).N' u) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N) \<or> (\<exists>N'. (R = AndL2 (v).N' x) \<and> y=u \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y u v x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh alpha trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,v)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,v)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_AndL2_aux:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndL2 (v).N u"
shows "(x=u \<and> x=y) \<or> (x\<noteq>u)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y u v x N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma nrename_AndR:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = AndR <c>.M <d>.N e" "c\<sharp>(d,e,N,R)" "d\<sharp>(c,e,M,R)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = AndR <c>.M' <d>.N' e \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> d\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x y c d e M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname2,d)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[x\<turnstile>n>y]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_OrR1:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = OrR1 <c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,d)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = OrR1 <c>.N' d) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x y c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_OrR2:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = OrR2 <c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,d)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = OrR2 <c>.N' d) \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: x y c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname1,c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_OrL:
assumes a: "R[u\<turnstile>n>v] = OrL (x).M (y).N z" "x\<sharp>(y,z,u,v,N,R)" "y\<sharp>(x,z,u,v,M,R)" "z\<sharp>(u,v)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = OrL (x).M' (y).N' z \<and> M'[u\<turnstile>n>v] = M \<and> N'[u\<turnstile>n>v] = N \<and> x\<sharp>N' \<and> y\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: u v x y z M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,x)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(name2,y)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[u\<turnstile>n>v]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_OrL':
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = OrL (v).M (w).N u" "v\<sharp>(R,N,u,x,y)" "w\<sharp>(R,M,u,x,y)" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "(\<exists>M' N'. (R = OrL (v).M' (w).N' u) \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N) \<or>
(\<exists>M' N'. (R = OrL (v).M' (w).N' x) \<and> y=u \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y x u v w M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh alpha trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,v)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name2,w)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[x\<turnstile>n>u]" in sym)
apply(drule_tac pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,v)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name2,w)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[x\<turnstile>n>y]" in sym)
apply(drule_tac pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_OrL_aux:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = OrL (v).M (w).N u"
shows "(x=u \<and> x=y) \<or> (x\<noteq>u)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y x w u v M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma nrename_ImpL:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = ImpL <c>.M (u).N z" "c\<sharp>(N,R)" "u\<sharp>(y,x,z,M,R)" "z\<sharp>(x,y)"
shows "\<exists>M' N'. R = ImpL <c>.M' (u).N' z \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N \<and> c\<sharp>N' \<and> u\<sharp>M'"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: u x c y z M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,u)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[x\<turnstile>n>y]" in sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma nrename_ImpL':
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = ImpL <c>.M (w).N u" "c\<sharp>(R,N)" "w\<sharp>(R,M,u,x,y)" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "(\<exists>M' N'. (R = ImpL <c>.M' (w).N' u) \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N) \<or>
(\<exists>M' N'. (R = ImpL <c>.M' (w).N' x) \<and> y=u \<and> M'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = M \<and> N'[x\<turnstile>n>y] = N)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y x u c w M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_fresh alpha trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,w)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[x\<turnstile>n>u]" in sym)
apply(drule_tac pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(coname,c)]\<bullet>trm1" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name1,w)]\<bullet>trm2" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac s="trm2[x\<turnstile>n>y]" in sym)
apply(drule_tac pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_ImpL_aux:
assumes a: "R[x\<turnstile>n>y] = ImpL <c>.M (w).N u"
shows "(x=u \<and> x=y) \<or> (x\<noteq>u)"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: y x w u c M N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
done
lemma nrename_ImpR:
assumes a: "R[u\<turnstile>n>v] = ImpR (x).<c>.N d" "c\<sharp>(R,d)" "x\<sharp>(R,u,v)"
shows "\<exists>N'. (R = ImpR (x).<c>.N' d) \<and> N'[u\<turnstile>n>v] = N"
using a
apply(nominal_induct R avoiding: u v x c d N rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_perm alpha abs_fresh trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(rule_tac x="[(name,x)]\<bullet>[(coname1, c)]\<bullet>trm" in exI)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_supp fin_supp abs_fresh fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst,OF at_coname_inst])
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst,OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: eqvts calc_atm)
done
lemma nrename_credu:
assumes a: "(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M'"
shows "\<exists>M0. M0[x\<turnstile>n>y]=M' \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>c M0"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M\<equiv>"M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" M' avoiding: M x y rule: c_redu.strong_induct)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x="M'{a:=(x).N'}" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_comm fresh_prod)
apply(rule c_redu.intros)
apply(auto dest: not_fic_nrename)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)
apply(rule_tac x="N'{x:=<a>.M'}" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh subst_comm fresh_prod)
apply(rule c_redu.intros)
apply(auto)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" and y="y" in fin_nrename)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh)
done
lemma nrename_ax2:
assumes a: "N[x\<turnstile>n>y] = Ax z c"
shows "\<exists>z. N = Ax z c"
using a
apply(nominal_induct N avoiding: x y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto split: if_splits)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
done
lemma fic_nrename:
assumes a: "fic (M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) c"
shows "fic M c"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: c x y rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto dest!: fic_elims intro!: fic.intros simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm rename_fresh abs_fresh
split: if_splits)
apply(auto dest: nrename_fresh_interesting2 simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma nrename_lredu:
assumes a: "(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M'"
shows "\<exists>M0. M0[x\<turnstile>n>y]=M' \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>l M0"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M\<equiv>"M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" M' avoiding: M x y rule: l_redu.strong_induct)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(case_tac "xa=y")
apply(simp add: nrename_id)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(assumption)
apply(frule nrename_ax2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "z=xa")
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="M'[a\<turnstile>c>b]" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule crename_interesting3)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto dest: fic_nrename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(case_tac "xa=ya")
apply(simp add: nrename_id)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(assumption)
apply(frule nrename_ax2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(case_tac "z=xa")
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="N'[x\<turnstile>n>xa]" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule nrename_interesting1)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto dest: fin_nrename2 simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule_tac x="N'[x\<turnstile>n>y]" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule nrename_interesting2)
apply(simp_all)
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto dest: fin_nrename2 simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* LNot *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_NotR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_NotL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <b>.N'b (x).N'a" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LAnd1 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_AndR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_AndL1)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a1>.M'a (x).N'b" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LAnd2 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_AndR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_AndL2)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a2>.N'a (x).N'b" in exI)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LOr1 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_OrL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_OrR1)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.N' (x1).M'a" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* LOr2 *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_OrL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_OrR2)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.N' (x2).N'a" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
(* ImpL *)
apply(auto dest: fin_crename simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_ImpL)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_ImpR)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.(Cut <c>.M'a (x).N') (y).N'a" in exI)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule l_redu.intros)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting1)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod intro: nrename_fresh_interesting2)[1]
done
lemma nrename_aredu:
assumes a: "(M[x\<turnstile>n>y]) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M'" "x\<noteq>y"
shows "\<exists>M0. M0[x\<turnstile>n>y]=M' \<and> M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a M0"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M\<equiv>"M[x\<turnstile>n>y]" M' avoiding: M x y rule: a_redu.strong_induct)
apply(simp)
apply(drule nrename_lredu)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(drule nrename_credu)
apply(blast)
(* Cut *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.M0 (x).N'" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(drule nrename_fresh_interesting2)
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule nrename_fresh_interesting1)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_Cut)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="Cut <a>.M' (x).M0" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: fresh_a_redu)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
(* NotL *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_NotL_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_NotL')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="NotL <a>.M0 x" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="NotL <a>.M0 xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* NotR *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_NotR)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="NotR (x).M0 a" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* AndR *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_AndR)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndR <a>.M0 <b>.N' c" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_AndR)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndR <a>.M' <b>.M0 c" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* AndL1 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_AndL1_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_AndL1')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ya" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndL1 (x).M0 y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndL1 (x).M0 xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* AndL2 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_AndL2_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_AndL2')
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ya" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndL2 (x).M0 y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="AndL2 (x).M0 xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* OrL *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_OrL_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_OrL')
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ya" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrL (x).M0 (y).N' z" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrL (x).M0 (y).N' xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_OrL_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_OrL')
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ya" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrL (x).M' (y).M0 z" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrL (x).M' (y).M0 xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrR1 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_OrR1)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrR1 <a>.M0 b" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* OrR2 *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_OrR2)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="OrR2 <a>.M0 b" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
(* ImpL *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_ImpL_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_ImpL')
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ya" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpL <a>.M0 (x).N' y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpL <a>.M0 (x).N' xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(drule sym)
apply(frule nrename_ImpL_aux)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule nrename_ImpL')
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ya" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpL <a>.M' (x).M0 y" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpL <a>.M' (x).M0 xa" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(auto intro: fresh_a_redu)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: fresh_prod abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
(* ImpR *)
apply(drule sym)
apply(drule nrename_ImpR)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="xa" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in meta_spec)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule_tac x="ImpR (x).<a>.M0 b" in exI)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_atm)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
done
lemma SNa_preserved_renaming2:
assumes a: "SNa N"
shows "SNa (N[x\<turnstile>n>y])"
using a
apply(induct rule: SNa_induct)
apply(case_tac "x=y")
apply(simp add: nrename_id)
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule nrename_aredu)
apply(blast)+
done
text {* helper-stuff to set up the induction *}
abbreviation
SNa_set :: "trm set"
where
"SNa_set \<equiv> {M. SNa M}"
abbreviation
A_Redu_set :: "(trm\<times>trm) set"
where
"A_Redu_set \<equiv> {(N,M)| M N. M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N}"
lemma SNa_elim:
assumes a: "SNa M"
shows "(\<forall>M. (\<forall>N. M \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a N \<longrightarrow> P N)\<longrightarrow> P M) \<longrightarrow> P M"
using a
by (induct rule: SNa.induct) (blast)
lemma wf_SNa_restricted:
shows "wf (A_Redu_set \<inter> (UNIV <*> SNa_set))"
apply(unfold wf_def)
apply(intro strip)
apply(case_tac "SNa x")
apply(simp (no_asm_use))
apply(drule_tac P="P" in SNa_elim)
apply(erule mp)
apply(blast)
(* other case *)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(erule mp)
apply(fast)
done
constdefs
SNa_Redu :: "(trm \<times> trm) set"
"SNa_Redu \<equiv> A_Redu_set \<inter> (UNIV <*> SNa_set)"
lemma wf_SNa_Redu:
shows "wf SNa_Redu"
apply(unfold SNa_Redu_def)
apply(rule wf_SNa_restricted)
done
lemma wf_measure_triple:
shows "wf ((measure size) <*lex*> SNa_Redu <*lex*> SNa_Redu)"
by (auto intro: wf_SNa_Redu)
lemma my_wf_induct_triple:
assumes a: " wf(r1 <*lex*> r2 <*lex*> r3)"
and b: "\<And>x. \<lbrakk>\<And>y. ((fst y,fst (snd y),snd (snd y)),(fst x,fst (snd x), snd (snd x)))
\<in> (r1 <*lex*> r2 <*lex*> r3) \<longrightarrow> P y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P x"
shows "P x"
using a
apply(induct x rule: wf_induct_rule)
apply(rule b)
apply(simp)
done
lemma my_wf_induct_triple':
assumes a: " wf(r1 <*lex*> r2 <*lex*> r3)"
and b: "\<And>x1 x2 x3. \<lbrakk>\<And>y1 y2 y3. ((y1,y2,y3),(x1,x2,x3)) \<in> (r1 <*lex*> r2 <*lex*> r3) \<longrightarrow> P (y1,y2,y3)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> P (x1,x2,x3)"
shows "P (x1,x2,x3)"
apply(rule_tac my_wf_induct_triple[OF a])
apply(case_tac x)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac b)
apply(simp)
apply(rule b)
apply(blast)
done
lemma my_wf_induct_triple'':
assumes a: " wf(r1 <*lex*> r2 <*lex*> r3)"
and b: "\<And>x1 x2 x3. \<lbrakk>\<And>y1 y2 y3. ((y1,y2,y3),(x1,x2,x3)) \<in> (r1 <*lex*> r2 <*lex*> r3) \<longrightarrow> P y1 y2 y3\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> P x1 x2 x3"
shows "P x1 x2 x3"
apply(rule_tac my_wf_induct_triple'[where P="\<lambda>(x1,x2,x3). P x1 x2 x3", simplified])
apply(rule a)
apply(rule b)
apply(auto)
done
lemma excluded_m:
assumes a: "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)" "(x):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "(<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<or> (x):N \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>))
\<or>\<not>(<a>:M \<in> BINDINGc B (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>) \<or> (x):N \<in> BINDINGn B (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>))"
by (blast)
lemma tricky_subst:
assumes a1: "b\<sharp>(c,N)"
and a2: "z\<sharp>(x,P)"
and a3: "M\<noteq>Ax z b"
shows "(Cut <c>.N (z).M){b:=(x).P} = Cut <c>.N (z).(M{b:=(x).P})"
using a1 a2 a3
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.N (z).M = Cut <ca>.([(ca,c)]\<bullet>N) (z).M")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "b\<sharp>([(ca,c)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
text {* 3rd lemma *}
lemma CUT_SNa_aux:
assumes a1: "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
and a2: "SNa M"
and a3: "(x):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
and a4: "SNa N"
shows "SNa (Cut <a>.M (x).N)"
using a1 a2 a3 a4
apply(induct B M N arbitrary: a x rule: my_wf_induct_triple''[OF wf_measure_triple])
apply(rule SNaI)
apply(drule Cut_a_redu_elim)
apply(erule disjE)
(* left-inner reduction *)
apply(erule exE)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x3" in meta_spec)
apply(drule conjunct2)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(simp add: SNa_Redu_def)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_preserved_single)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: a_preserves_SNa)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
(* right-inner reduction *)
apply(erule exE)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="x1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="x2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule conjunct2)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(simp add: SNa_Redu_def)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_preserved_single)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_preserved_single)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: a_preserves_SNa)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(******** c-reduction *********)
apply(drule Cut_c_redu_elim)
(* c-left reduction*)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule_tac B="x1" in fic_CANDS)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
(* in AXIOMSc *)
apply(simp add: AXIOMSc_def)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp add: ctrm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "fic (Ax y b) b")(*A*)
apply(simp)
(*A*)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "fic (Ax ([(a,aa)]\<bullet>y) a) a")(*B*)
apply(simp)
(*B*)
apply(auto)[1]
(* in BINDINGc *)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(simp)
(* c-right reduction*)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule_tac B="x1" in fin_CANDS)
apply(simp)
apply(erule disjE)
(* in AXIOMSc *)
apply(simp add: AXIOMSn_def)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp add: ntrm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "fin (Ax xa b) xa")(*A*)
apply(simp)
(*A*)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "fin (Ax x ([(x,xa)]\<bullet>b)) x")(*B*)
apply(simp)
(*B*)
apply(auto)[1]
(* in BINDINGc *)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(simp)
(*********** l-reductions ************)
apply(drule Cut_l_redu_elim)
apply(erule disjE)
(* ax1 *)
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: SNa_preserved_renaming1)
apply(erule disjE)
(* ax2 *)
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp add: SNa_preserved_renaming2)
apply(erule disjE)
(* LNot *)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(auto)[1]
apply(frule_tac excluded_m)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(* one of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="NotL <b>.N' x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_NotR_substc)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.NotR (y).M'a a' (x).NotL <b>.N' x)
= Cut <c>.NotR (y).M'a c (x).NotL <b>.N' x")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.NotR (y).M'a c (x).NotL <b>.N' x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.N' (y).M'a")
apply(simp only: a_preserves_SNa)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LNot_intro)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* other case of in BINDING *)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="NotR (y).M'a a" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_NotL_substn)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <a>.NotR (y).M'a a (x').NotL <b>.N' x')
= Cut <a>.NotR (y).M'a a (c).NotL <b>.N' c")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.NotR (y).M'a a (c).NotL <b>.N' c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.N' (y).M'a")
apply(simp only: a_preserves_SNa)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LNot_intro)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* none of them in BINDING *)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule CAND_NotR_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)
apply(frule CAND_NotL_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp only: ty.inject)
apply(drule_tac x="B'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 13)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 13)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 13)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 13)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* LAnd1 case *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(auto)[1]
apply(frule_tac excluded_m)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(* one of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="AndL1 (y).N' x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_AndR_substc)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a' (x).AndL1 (y).N' x)
= Cut <ca>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 ca (x).AndL1 (y).N' x")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <ca>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 ca (x).AndL1 (y).N' x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.M1 (y).N'")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAnd1_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* other case of in BINDING *)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_AndL1_substn)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <a>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a (z').AndL1 (y).N' z')
= Cut <a>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a (ca).AndL1 (y).N' ca")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a (ca).AndL1 (y).N' ca \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.M1 (y).N'")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAnd1_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* none of them in BINDING *)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule CAND_AndR_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)
apply(frule CAND_AndL1_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp only: ty.inject)
apply(drule_tac x="B1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* LAnd2 case *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(auto)[1]
apply(frule_tac excluded_m)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(* one of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="AndL2 (y).N' x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_AndR_substc)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a' (x).AndL2 (y).N' x)
= Cut <ca>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 ca (x).AndL2 (y).N' x")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <ca>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 ca (x).AndL2 (y).N' x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <c>.M2 (y).N'")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAnd2_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* other case of in BINDING *)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_AndL2_substn)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <a>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a (z').AndL2 (y).N' z')
= Cut <a>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a (ca).AndL2 (y).N' ca")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.AndR <b>.M1 <c>.M2 a (ca).AndL2 (y).N' ca \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <c>.M2 (y).N'")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAnd2_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* none of them in BINDING *)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule CAND_AndR_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)
apply(frule CAND_AndL2_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp only: ty.inject)
apply(drule_tac x="B2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* LOr1 case *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(auto)[1]
apply(frule_tac excluded_m)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(* one of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_OrR1_substc)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR1 <b>.N' a' (x).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x)
= Cut <c>.OrR1 <b>.N' c (x).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.OrR1 <b>.N' c (x).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.N' (z).M1")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LOr1_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* other case of in BINDING *)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="OrR1 <b>.N' a" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_OrL_substn)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <a>.OrR1 <b>.N' a (z').OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 z')
= Cut <a>.OrR1 <b>.N' a (c).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 c")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.OrR1 <b>.N' a (c).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.N' (z).M1")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LOr1_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* none of them in BINDING *)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule CAND_OrR1_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(frule CAND_OrL_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp only: ty.inject)
apply(drule_tac x="B1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M1" in meta_spec)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(drule_tac x="z" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* LOr2 case *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(auto)[1]
apply(frule_tac excluded_m)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(* one of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_OrR2_substc)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR2 <b>.N' a' (x).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x)
= Cut <c>.OrR2 <b>.N' c (x).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.OrR2 <b>.N' c (x).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.N' (y).M2")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LOr2_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* other case of in BINDING *)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="OrR2 <b>.N' a" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_OrL_substn)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <a>.OrR2 <b>.N' a (z').OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 z')
= Cut <a>.OrR2 <b>.N' a (c).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 c")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.OrR2 <b>.N' a (c).OrL (z).M1 (y).M2 c \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a Cut <b>.N' (y).M2")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LOr2_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* none of them in BINDING *)
apply(simp)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule CAND_OrR2_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(frule CAND_OrL_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp only: ty.inject)
apply(drule_tac x="B2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N'" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M2" in meta_spec)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 15)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* LImp case *)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(auto)[1]
apply(frule_tac excluded_m)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule disjE)
(* one of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule disjE)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGc_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="x" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 x" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_ImpR_substc)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.ImpR (z).<b>.M'a a' (x).ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 x)
= Cut <ca>.ImpR (z).<b>.M'a ca (x).ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 x")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <ca>.ImpR (z).<b>.M'a ca (x).ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 x \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a
Cut <b>.Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a (y).N2")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LImp_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp)
(* other case of in BINDING *)
apply(drule fin_elims)
apply(drule fic_elims)
apply(simp)
apply(drule BINDINGn_elim)
apply(drule_tac x="a" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="ImpR (z).<b>.M'a a" in spec)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: better_ImpL_substn)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <a>.ImpR (z).<b>.M'a a (z').ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 z')
= Cut <a>.ImpR (z).<b>.M'a a (ca).ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 ca")
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.ImpR (z).<b>.M'a a (ca).ImpL <c>.N1 (y).N2 ca \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a
Cut <b>.Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a (y).N2")
apply(auto intro: a_preserves_SNa)[1]
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LImp_intro)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(simp)
(* none of them in BINDING *)
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule CAND_ImpL_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(frule CAND_ImpR_elim) (* check here *)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(simp only: ty.inject)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(case_tac "M'a=Ax z b")
(* case Ma = Ax z b *)
apply(rule_tac t="Cut <b>.(Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a) (y).N2" and s="Cut <b>.(M'a{z:=<c>.N1}) (y).N2" in subst)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N1" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule_tac x="B2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="M'a{z:=<c>.N1}" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule conjunct1)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(rotate_tac 17)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(rotate_tac 17)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* case Ma \<noteq> Ax z b *)
apply(subgoal_tac "<b>:Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a \<in> \<parallel><B2>\<parallel>") (* lemma *)
apply(frule_tac meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="B2" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N2" in meta_spec)
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(rotate_tac 20)
apply(drule_tac x="b" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 20)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 20)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(rotate_tac 20)
apply(drule_tac x="y" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 20)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rotate_tac 20)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(* lemma *)
apply(subgoal_tac "<b>:Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a \<in> BINDINGc B2 (\<parallel>(B2)\<parallel>)") (* second lemma *)
apply(simp add: BINDING_implies_CAND)
(* second lemma *)
apply(simp (no_asm) add: BINDINGc_def)
apply(rule exI)+
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule refl)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(rule_tac t="Cut <c>.N1 (z).M'a" and s="Cut <c>.N1 (ca).([(ca,z)]\<bullet>M'a)" in subst)
apply(simp add: trm.inject alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule_tac t="(Cut <c>.N1 (ca).([(ca,z)]\<bullet>M'a)){b:=(xa).P}"
and s="Cut <c>.N1 (ca).(([(ca,z)]\<bullet>M'a){b:=(xa).P})" in subst)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule tricky_subst)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(clarify)
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
apply(drule_tac x="B1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="N1" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="([(ca,z)]\<bullet>M'a){b:=(xa).P}" in meta_spec)
apply(drule conjunct1)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp)
apply(rotate_tac 19)
apply(drule_tac x="c" in spec)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(rotate_tac 19)
apply(drule_tac x="ca" in spec)
apply(subgoal_tac "(ca):([(ca,z)]\<bullet>M'a){b:=(xa).P} \<in> \<parallel>(B1)\<parallel>")(*A*)
apply(drule mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule mp)
apply(simp add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
apply(assumption)
(*A*)
apply(drule_tac x="[(ca,z)]\<bullet>xa" in spec)
apply(drule_tac x="[(ca,z)]\<bullet>P" in spec)
apply(rotate_tac 19)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_left)
apply(drule mp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm)[1]
apply(rule conjI)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm)[1]
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ca,z)]" and x="(xa):P" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name)
apply(drule_tac pi="[(ca,z)]" and X="\<parallel>(B1)\<parallel>" in pt_set_bij2[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: CAND_eqvt_name csubst_eqvt)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: calc_atm)
done
(* parallel substitution *)
lemma CUT_SNa:
assumes a1: "<a>:M \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
and a2: "(x):N \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
shows "SNa (Cut <a>.M (x).N)"
using a1 a2
apply -
apply(rule CUT_SNa_aux[OF a1])
apply(simp_all add: CANDs_imply_SNa)
done
fun
findn :: "(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>name\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>trm) option"
where
"findn [] x = None"
| "findn ((y,c,P)#\<theta>n) x = (if y=x then Some (c,P) else findn \<theta>n x)"
lemma findn_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>findn \<theta>n x) = findn (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>n) (pi1\<bullet>x)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>findn \<theta>n x) = findn (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>n) (pi2\<bullet>x)"
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: perm_bij)
done
lemma findn_fresh:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>\<theta>n"
shows "findn \<theta>n x = None"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
fun
findc :: "(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(name\<times>trm) option"
where
"findc [] x = None"
| "findc ((c,y,P)#\<theta>c) a = (if a=c then Some (y,P) else findc \<theta>c a)"
lemma findc_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>findc \<theta>c a) = findc (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>c) (pi1\<bullet>a)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>findc \<theta>c a) = findc (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>c) (pi2\<bullet>a)"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: perm_bij)
done
lemma findc_fresh:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "findc \<theta>c a = None"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
abbreviation
nmaps :: "(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list \<Rightarrow> name \<Rightarrow> (coname\<times>trm) option \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ nmaps _ to _" [55,55,55] 55)
where
"\<theta>n nmaps x to P \<equiv> (findn \<theta>n x) = P"
abbreviation
cmaps :: "(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list \<Rightarrow> coname \<Rightarrow> (name\<times>trm) option \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ cmaps _ to _" [55,55,55] 55)
where
"\<theta>c cmaps a to P \<equiv> (findc \<theta>c a) = P"
lemma nmaps_fresh:
shows "\<theta>n nmaps x to Some (c,P) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>\<theta>n \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>(c,P)"
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "aa=x")
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "aa=x")
apply(auto)
done
lemma cmaps_fresh:
shows "\<theta>c cmaps a to Some (y,P) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>\<theta>c \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>(y,P)"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
done
lemma nmaps_false:
shows "\<theta>n nmaps x to Some (c,P) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>\<theta>n \<Longrightarrow> False"
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma cmaps_false:
shows "\<theta>c cmaps c to Some (x,P) \<Longrightarrow> c\<sharp>\<theta>c \<Longrightarrow> False"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
fun
lookupa :: "name\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm"
where
"lookupa x a [] = Ax x a"
| "lookupa x a ((c,y,P)#\<theta>c) = (if a=c then Cut <a>.Ax x a (y).P else lookupa x a \<theta>c)"
lemma lookupa_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(lookupa x a \<theta>c)) = lookupa (pi1\<bullet>x) (pi1\<bullet>a) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>c)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(lookupa x a \<theta>c)) = lookupa (pi2\<bullet>x) (pi2\<bullet>a) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>c)"
apply -
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
done
lemma lookupa_fire:
assumes a: "\<theta>c cmaps a to Some (y,P)"
shows "(lookupa x a \<theta>c) = Cut <a>.Ax x a (y).P"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c arbitrary: x a y P)
apply(auto)
done
fun
lookupb :: "name\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>trm\<Rightarrow>trm"
where
"lookupb x a [] c P = Cut <c>.P (x).Ax x a"
| "lookupb x a ((d,y,N)#\<theta>c) c P = (if a=d then Cut <c>.P (y).N else lookupb x a \<theta>c c P)"
lemma lookupb_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(lookupb x a \<theta>c c P)) = lookupb (pi1\<bullet>x) (pi1\<bullet>a) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>c) (pi1\<bullet>c) (pi1\<bullet>P)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(lookupb x a \<theta>c c P)) = lookupb (pi2\<bullet>x) (pi2\<bullet>a) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>c) (pi2\<bullet>c) (pi2\<bullet>P)"
apply -
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
done
fun
lookup :: "name\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm"
where
"lookup x a [] \<theta>c = lookupa x a \<theta>c"
| "lookup x a ((y,c,P)#\<theta>n) \<theta>c = (if x=y then (lookupb x a \<theta>c c P) else lookup x a \<theta>n \<theta>c)"
lemma lookup_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(lookup x a \<theta>n \<theta>c)) = lookup (pi1\<bullet>x) (pi1\<bullet>a) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>n) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>c)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(lookup x a \<theta>n \<theta>c)) = lookup (pi2\<bullet>x) (pi2\<bullet>a) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>n) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>c)"
apply -
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
done
fun
lookupc :: "name\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm"
where
"lookupc x a [] = Ax x a"
| "lookupc x a ((y,c,P)#\<theta>n) = (if x=y then P[c\<turnstile>c>a] else lookupc x a \<theta>n)"
lemma lookupc_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(lookupc x a \<theta>n)) = lookupc (pi1\<bullet>x) (pi1\<bullet>a) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>n)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(lookupc x a \<theta>n)) = lookupc (pi2\<bullet>x) (pi2\<bullet>a) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>n)"
apply -
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
done
fun
lookupd :: "name\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm"
where
"lookupd x a [] = Ax x a"
| "lookupd x a ((c,y,P)#\<theta>c) = (if a=c then P[y\<turnstile>n>x] else lookupd x a \<theta>c)"
lemma lookupd_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(lookupd x a \<theta>n)) = lookupd (pi1\<bullet>x) (pi1\<bullet>a) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>n)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(lookupd x a \<theta>n)) = lookupd (pi2\<bullet>x) (pi2\<bullet>a) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>n)"
apply -
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts)
done
lemma lookupa_fresh:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "lookupa y a \<theta>c = Ax y a"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupa_csubst:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "Cut <a>.Ax y a (x).P = (lookupa y a \<theta>c){a:=(x).P}"
using a by (simp add: lookupa_fresh)
lemma lookupa_freshness:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(\<theta>c,c) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>lookupa y c \<theta>c"
and "x\<sharp>(\<theta>c,y) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>lookupa y c \<theta>c"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons abs_fresh fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupa_unicity:
assumes a: "lookupa x a \<theta>c= Ax y b" "b\<sharp>\<theta>c" "y\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "x=y \<and> a=b"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
done
lemma lookupb_csubst:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(\<theta>c,c,N)"
shows "Cut <c>.N (x).P = (lookupb y a \<theta>c c N){a:=(x).P}"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule sym)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.N (y).Ax y a = Cut <caa>.([(caa,c)]\<bullet>N) (ca).Ax ca a")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "a\<sharp>([(caa,c)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: alpha calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupb_freshness:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(\<theta>c,c,b,P) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>lookupb y c \<theta>c b P"
and "x\<sharp>(\<theta>c,y,P) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>lookupb y c \<theta>c b P"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons abs_fresh fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupb_unicity:
assumes a: "lookupb x a \<theta>c c P = Ax y b" "b\<sharp>(\<theta>c,c,P)" "y\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "x=y \<and> a=b"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
done
lemma lookupb_lookupa:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "lookupb x c \<theta>c a P = (lookupa x c \<theta>c){x:=<a>.P}"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <c>.Ax x c (aa).b = Cut <ca>.Ax x ca (caa).([(caa,aa)]\<bullet>b)")
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>([(caa,aa)]\<bullet>b)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(simp add: alpha calc_atm fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha calc_atm fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
lemma lookup_csubst:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)"
shows "lookup y c \<theta>n ((a,x,P)#\<theta>c) = (lookup y c \<theta>n \<theta>c){a:=(x).P}"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons)
apply(simp add: lookupa_csubst)
apply(simp add: lookupa_freshness forget fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(rule lookupb_csubst)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: lookupb_freshness forget fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
lemma lookup_fresh:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)"
shows "lookup x c \<theta>n \<theta>c = lookupa x c \<theta>c"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookup_unicity:
assumes a: "lookup x a \<theta>n \<theta>c= Ax y b" "b\<sharp>(\<theta>c,\<theta>n)" "y\<sharp>(\<theta>c,\<theta>n)"
shows "x=y \<and> a=b"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(drule lookupa_unicity)
apply(simp)+
apply(drule lookupa_unicity)
apply(simp)+
apply(case_tac "x=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(drule lookupb_unicity)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "x=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(drule lookupb_unicity)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
done
lemma lookup_freshness:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(c,\<theta>c,\<theta>n) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>lookup y c \<theta>n \<theta>c"
and "x\<sharp>(y,\<theta>c,\<theta>n) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>lookup y c \<theta>n \<theta>c"
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod lookupa_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod lookupa_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod lookupb_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm fresh_prod lookupb_freshness)
done
lemma lookupc_freshness:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(\<theta>c,c) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>lookupc y c \<theta>c"
and "x\<sharp>(\<theta>c,y) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>lookupc y c \<theta>c"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupc_fresh:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>\<theta>n"
shows "lookupc y a \<theta>n = Ax y a"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupc_nmaps:
assumes a: "\<theta>n nmaps x to Some (c,P)"
shows "lookupc x a \<theta>n = P[c\<turnstile>c>a]"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto)
done
lemma lookupc_unicity:
assumes a: "lookupc y a \<theta>n = Ax x b" "x\<sharp>\<theta>n"
shows "y=x"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)
apply(case_tac "y=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>(ba[aa\<turnstile>c>a])")
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp)
done
lemma lookupd_fresh:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "lookupd y a \<theta>c = Ax y a"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupd_unicity:
assumes a: "lookupd y a \<theta>c = Ax y b" "b\<sharp>\<theta>c"
shows "a=b"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)
apply(case_tac "a=aa")
apply(auto)
apply(subgoal_tac "b\<sharp>(ba[aa\<turnstile>n>y])")
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp)
done
lemma lookupd_freshness:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(\<theta>c,c) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>lookupd y c \<theta>c"
and "x\<sharp>(\<theta>c,y) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>lookupd y c \<theta>c"
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_list_cons abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule rename_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookupd_cmaps:
assumes a: "\<theta>c cmaps a to Some (x,P)"
shows "lookupd y a \<theta>c = P[x\<turnstile>n>y]"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto)
done
consts
stn :: "trm\<Rightarrow>(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm"
stc :: "trm\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm"
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "\<theta>n::(name\<times>coname\<times>trm)")
"stn (Ax x a) \<theta>n = lookupc x a \<theta>n"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,\<theta>n);x\<sharp>(M,\<theta>n)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stn (Cut <a>.M (x).N) \<theta>n = (Cut <a>.M (x).N)"
"x\<sharp>\<theta>n \<Longrightarrow> stn (NotR (x).M a) \<theta>n = (NotR (x).M a)"
"a\<sharp>\<theta>n \<Longrightarrow>stn (NotL <a>.M x) \<theta>n = (NotL <a>.M x)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,d,b,\<theta>n);b\<sharp>(M,d,a,\<theta>n)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stn (AndR <a>.M <b>.N d) \<theta>n = (AndR <a>.M <b>.N d)"
"x\<sharp>(z,\<theta>n) \<Longrightarrow> stn (AndL1 (x).M z) \<theta>n = (AndL1 (x).M z)"
"x\<sharp>(z,\<theta>n) \<Longrightarrow> stn (AndL2 (x).M z) \<theta>n = (AndL2 (x).M z)"
"a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>n) \<Longrightarrow> stn (OrR1 <a>.M b) \<theta>n = (OrR1 <a>.M b)"
"a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>n) \<Longrightarrow> stn (OrR2 <a>.M b) \<theta>n = (OrR2 <a>.M b)"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z,u,\<theta>n);u\<sharp>(M,z,x,\<theta>n)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stn (OrL (x).M (u).N z) \<theta>n = (OrL (x).M (u).N z)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>n);x\<sharp>\<theta>n\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stn (ImpR (x).<a>.M b) \<theta>n = (ImpR (x).<a>.M b)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,\<theta>n);x\<sharp>(M,z,\<theta>n)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stn (ImpL <a>.M (x).N z) \<theta>n = (ImpL <a>.M (x).N z)"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)+
apply(fresh_guess)+
done
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "\<theta>c::(coname\<times>name\<times>trm)")
"stc (Ax x a) \<theta>c = lookupd x a \<theta>c"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,\<theta>c);x\<sharp>(M,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stc (Cut <a>.M (x).N) \<theta>c = (Cut <a>.M (x).N)"
"x\<sharp>\<theta>c \<Longrightarrow> stc (NotR (x).M a) \<theta>c = (NotR (x).M a)"
"a\<sharp>\<theta>c \<Longrightarrow> stc (NotL <a>.M x) \<theta>c = (NotL <a>.M x)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,d,b,\<theta>c);b\<sharp>(M,d,a,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stc (AndR <a>.M <b>.N d) \<theta>c = (AndR <a>.M <b>.N d)"
"x\<sharp>(z,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> stc (AndL1 (x).M z) \<theta>c = (AndL1 (x).M z)"
"x\<sharp>(z,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> stc (AndL2 (x).M z) \<theta>c = (AndL2 (x).M z)"
"a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> stc (OrR1 <a>.M b) \<theta>c = (OrR1 <a>.M b)"
"a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> stc (OrR2 <a>.M b) \<theta>c = (OrR2 <a>.M b)"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z,u,\<theta>c);u\<sharp>(M,z,x,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stc (OrL (x).M (u).N z) \<theta>c = (OrL (x).M (u).N z)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>c);x\<sharp>\<theta>c\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stc (ImpR (x).<a>.M b) \<theta>c = (ImpR (x).<a>.M b)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,\<theta>c);x\<sharp>(M,z,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> stc (ImpL <a>.M (x).N z) \<theta>c = (ImpL <a>.M (x).N z)"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)+
apply(fresh_guess)+
done
lemma stn_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(stn M \<theta>n)) = stn (pi1\<bullet>M) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>n)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(stn M \<theta>n)) = stn (pi2\<bullet>M) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>n)"
apply -
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>n rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts fresh_bij fresh_prod eq_bij fresh_atm)
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>n rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts fresh_bij fresh_prod eq_bij fresh_atm)
done
lemma stc_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(stc M \<theta>c)) = stc (pi1\<bullet>M) (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>c)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(stc M \<theta>c)) = stc (pi2\<bullet>M) (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>c)"
apply -
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts fresh_bij fresh_prod eq_bij fresh_atm)
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eqvts fresh_bij fresh_prod eq_bij fresh_atm)
done
lemma stn_fresh:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(\<theta>n,M) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>stn M \<theta>n"
and "x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,M) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>stn M \<theta>n"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>n a x rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
done
lemma stc_fresh:
fixes a::"coname"
and x::"name"
shows "a\<sharp>(\<theta>c,M) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>stc M \<theta>c"
and "x\<sharp>(\<theta>c,M) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>stc M \<theta>c"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>c a x rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
done
lemma option_case_eqvt1[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
and B::"(name\<times>trm) option"
and r::"trm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(case B of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> s x P | None \<Rightarrow> r)) =
(case (pi1\<bullet>B) of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> (pi1\<bullet>s) x P | None \<Rightarrow> (pi1\<bullet>r))"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(case B of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> s x P| None \<Rightarrow> r)) =
(case (pi2\<bullet>B) of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> (pi2\<bullet>s) x P | None \<Rightarrow> (pi2\<bullet>r))"
apply(cases "B")
apply(auto)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(cases "B")
apply(auto)
apply(perm_simp)
done
lemma option_case_eqvt2[eqvt_force]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
and B::"(coname\<times>trm) option"
and r::"trm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(case B of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> s x P | None \<Rightarrow> r)) =
(case (pi1\<bullet>B) of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> (pi1\<bullet>s) x P | None \<Rightarrow> (pi1\<bullet>r))"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(case B of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> s x P| None \<Rightarrow> r)) =
(case (pi2\<bullet>B) of Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> (pi2\<bullet>s) x P | None \<Rightarrow> (pi2\<bullet>r))"
apply(cases "B")
apply(auto)
apply(perm_simp)
apply(cases "B")
apply(auto)
apply(perm_simp)
done
consts
psubst :: "(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>trm\<Rightarrow>trm" ("_,_<_>" [100,100,100] 100)
nominal_primrec (freshness_context: "(\<theta>n::(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list,\<theta>c::(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list)")
"\<theta>n,\<theta>c<Ax x a> = lookup x a \<theta>n \<theta>c"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,\<theta>n,\<theta>c);x\<sharp>(M,\<theta>n,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<theta>n,\<theta>c<Cut <a>.M (x).N> =
Cut <a>.(if \<exists>x. M=Ax x a then stn M \<theta>n else \<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>)
(x).(if \<exists>a. N=Ax x a then stc N \<theta>c else \<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>)"
"x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> \<theta>n,\<theta>c<NotR (x).M a> =
(case (findc \<theta>c a) of
Some (u,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.NotR (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) a' (u).P)
| None \<Rightarrow> NotR (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) a)"
"a\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> \<theta>n,\<theta>c<NotL <a>.M x> =
(case (findn \<theta>n x) of
Some (c,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>x'. Cut <c>.P (x').(NotL <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) x'))
| None \<Rightarrow> NotL <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) x)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,c,\<theta>n,\<theta>c);b\<sharp>(M,c,\<theta>n,\<theta>c);b\<noteq>a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<AndR <a>.M <b>.N c>) =
(case (findc \<theta>c c) of
Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.(AndR <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) <b>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>) a') (x).P)
| None \<Rightarrow> AndR <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) <b>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>) c)"
"x\<sharp>(z,\<theta>n,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<AndL1 (x).M z>) =
(case (findn \<theta>n z) of
Some (c,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL1 (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) z')
| None \<Rightarrow> AndL1 (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) z)"
"x\<sharp>(z,\<theta>n,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<AndL2 (x).M z>) =
(case (findn \<theta>n z) of
Some (c,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').AndL2 (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) z')
| None \<Rightarrow> AndL2 (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) z)"
"\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(N,z,\<theta>n,\<theta>c);u\<sharp>(M,z,\<theta>n,\<theta>c);x\<noteq>u\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<OrL (x).M (u).N z>) =
(case (findn \<theta>n z) of
Some (c,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').OrL (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) (u).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>) z')
| None \<Rightarrow> OrL (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) (u).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>) z)"
"a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>n,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<OrR1 <a>.M b>) =
(case (findc \<theta>c b) of
Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR1 <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) a' (x).P)
| None \<Rightarrow> OrR1 <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) b)"
"a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>n,\<theta>c) \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<OrR2 <a>.M b>) =
(case (findc \<theta>c b) of
Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.OrR2 <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) a' (x).P)
| None \<Rightarrow> OrR2 <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) b)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(b,\<theta>n,\<theta>c); x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<ImpR (x).<a>.M b>) =
(case (findc \<theta>c b) of
Some (z,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>a'. Cut <a'>.ImpR (x).<a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) a' (z).P)
| None \<Rightarrow> ImpR (x).<a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) b)"
"\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(N,\<theta>n,\<theta>c); x\<sharp>(z,M,\<theta>n,\<theta>c)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<ImpL <a>.M (x).N z>) =
(case (findn \<theta>n z) of
Some (c,P) \<Rightarrow> fresh_fun (\<lambda>z'. Cut <c>.P (z').ImpL <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>) z')
| None \<Rightarrow> ImpL <a>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>) z)"
apply(finite_guess)+
apply(rule TrueI)+
apply(simp add: abs_fresh stc_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh stn_fresh)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x3")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x3")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x5")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x5")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule_tac x="x3" in cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x3")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x3")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x3")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x3")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x5")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x5")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule_tac a="x3" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x4")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c x4")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule_tac x="x2" in cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x5")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n x5")
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp (no_asm))
apply(drule_tac a="x3" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(fresh_guess)+
done
lemma case_cong:
assumes a: "B1=B2" "x1=x2" "y1=y2"
shows "(case B1 of None \<Rightarrow> x1 | Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> y1 x P) = (case B2 of None \<Rightarrow> x2 | Some (x,P) \<Rightarrow> y2 x P)"
using a
apply(auto)
done
lemma find_maps:
shows "\<theta>c cmaps a to (findc \<theta>c a)"
and "\<theta>n nmaps x to (findn \<theta>n x)"
apply(auto)
done
lemma psubst_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "pi1\<bullet>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) = (pi1\<bullet>\<theta>n),(pi1\<bullet>\<theta>c)<(pi1\<bullet>M)>"
and "pi2\<bullet>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) = (pi2\<bullet>\<theta>n),(pi2\<bullet>\<theta>c)<(pi2\<bullet>M)>"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>n \<theta>c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: eq_bij fresh_bij eqvts perm_pi_simp)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
apply(rule case_cong)
apply(rule find_maps)
apply(simp)
apply(perm_simp add: eqvts)
done
lemma ax_psubst:
assumes a: "\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M> = Ax x a"
and b: "a\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)" "x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)"
shows "M = Ax x a"
using a b
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<theta>n \<theta>c rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
apply(drule lookup_unicity)
apply(simp)+
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname3")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name3")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp)
done
lemma better_Cut_substc1:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(P,b)" "b\<sharp>N"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){b:=(y).P} = Cut <a>.(M{b:=(y).P}) (x).N"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>M) (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(subgoal_tac"b\<sharp>([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
done
lemma better_Cut_substc2:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(y,P)" "b\<sharp>(a,M)" "N\<noteq>Ax x b"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){b:=(y).P} = Cut <a>.M (x).(N{b:=(y).P})"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>M) (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_name_inst, OF at_name_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac"b\<sharp>([(c,a)]\<bullet>M)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
done
lemma better_Cut_substn1:
assumes a: "y\<sharp>(x,N)" "a\<sharp>(b,P)" "M\<noteq>Ax y a"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){y:=<b>.P} = Cut <a>.(M{y:=<b>.P}) (x).N"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>M) (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm fresh_atm fresh_prod)
apply(subgoal_tac"y\<sharp>([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(perm_simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_left calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
done
lemma better_Cut_substn2:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(P,y)" "y\<sharp>M"
shows "(Cut <a>.M (x).N){y:=<b>.P} = Cut <a>.M (x).(N{y:=<b>.P})"
using a
apply -
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(subgoal_tac "Cut <a>.M (x).N = Cut <c>.([(c,a)]\<bullet>M) (ca).([(ca,x)]\<bullet>N)")
apply(simp)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(drule pt_bij1[OF pt_coname_inst, OF at_coname_inst])
apply(simp add: calc_atm fresh_atm)
apply(subgoal_tac"y\<sharp>([(c,a)]\<bullet>M)")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(perm_simp)
apply(simp add: fresh_left calc_atm)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha eqvts calc_atm fresh_prod fresh_atm subst_fresh)[1]
done
lemma psubst_fresh_name:
fixes x::"name"
assumes a: "x\<sharp>\<theta>n" "x\<sharp>\<theta>c" "x\<sharp>M"
shows "x\<sharp>\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: x \<theta>n \<theta>c rule: trm.induct)
apply(simp add: lookup_freshness)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(simp add: lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname3")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name3")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
done
lemma psubst_fresh_coname:
fixes a::"coname"
assumes a: "a\<sharp>\<theta>n" "a\<sharp>\<theta>c" "a\<sharp>M"
shows "a\<sharp>\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a \<theta>n \<theta>c rule: trm.induct)
apply(simp add: lookup_freshness)
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(simp add: lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname3")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name3")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh abs_supp fin_supp fresh_prod fresh_atm cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(auto simp add: abs_fresh)[1]
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm nmaps_fresh)
done
lemma psubst_csubst:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)"
shows "\<theta>n,((a,x,P)#\<theta>c)<M> = ((\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>){a:=(x).P})"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a x \<theta>n \<theta>c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: lookup_csubst)
apply(simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: lookupd_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "a\<sharp>lookupc xa coname \<theta>n")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha nrename_swap fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: lookupd_unicity)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "a\<sharp>lookupc xa coname \<theta>n")
apply(subgoal_tac "a\<sharp>lookupd name aa \<theta>c")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(drule ax_psubst)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "a\<sharp>lookupc xa coname \<theta>n")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha)
apply(simp add: alpha nrename_swap fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: lookupd_fresh)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: lookupd_unicity)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "a\<sharp>lookupd name aa \<theta>c")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(drule ax_psubst)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
(* NotR *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule cmaps_false)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* NotL *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* AndR *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname3")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule cmaps_false)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* AndL1 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* AndL2 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrR1 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule cmaps_false)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrR2 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule cmaps_false)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrL *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name3")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons psubst_fresh_name fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_name fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* ImpR *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule cmaps_false)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc1)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* ImpL *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons psubst_fresh_coname psubst_fresh_name fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh subst_fresh)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substc2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname psubst_fresh_name fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
done
lemma psubst_nsubst:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c)"
shows "((x,a,P)#\<theta>n),\<theta>c<M> = ((\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>){x:=<a>.P})"
using a
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: a x \<theta>n \<theta>c P rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: lookup_fresh)
apply(rule lookupb_lookupa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule forget)
apply(rule lookup_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(auto simp add: lookupc_freshness fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp add: lookupc_fresh)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp add: lookupd_fresh)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>lookupd name aa \<theta>c")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha crename_swap fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: lookupc_unicity)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>lookupc xa coname \<theta>n")
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>lookupd name aa \<theta>c")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: trm.inject)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp add: alpha crename_swap fresh_atm)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: lookupc_fresh)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: lookupc_unicity)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>lookupc xa coname \<theta>n")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule lookupc_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(drule ax_psubst)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
apply(rule impI)
apply(subgoal_tac "x\<sharp>lookupd name aa \<theta>c")
apply(simp add: forget)
apply(rule lookupd_freshness)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(rule impI)
apply(drule ax_psubst)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
(* NotR *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn1)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* NotL *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule nmaps_false)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nmaps_fresh)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
(* AndR *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname3")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn1)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* AndL1 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule nmaps_false)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* AndL2 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule nmaps_false)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrR1 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn1)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrR2 *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn1)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* OrL *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name3")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons psubst_fresh_name fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule nmaps_false)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_name fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* ImpR *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findc \<theta>c coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn1)
apply(simp add: cmaps_fresh)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
(* ImpL *)
apply(simp)
apply(case_tac "findn \<theta>n name2")
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons psubst_fresh_coname psubst_fresh_name fresh_atm fresh_prod)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod)[1]
apply(drule nmaps_false)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule trans)
apply(rule better_Cut_substn2)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nmaps_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_fresh_coname psubst_fresh_name fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
done
definition
ncloses :: "(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>(name\<times>ty) list \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ ncloses _" [55,55] 55)
where
"\<theta>n ncloses \<Gamma> \<equiv> \<forall>x B. ((x,B) \<in> set \<Gamma> \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>c P. \<theta>n nmaps x to Some (c,P) \<and> <c>:P \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)))"
definition
ccloses :: "(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>ty) list \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ ccloses _" [55,55] 55)
where
"\<theta>c ccloses \<Delta> \<equiv> \<forall>a B. ((a,B) \<in> set \<Delta> \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x P. \<theta>c cmaps a to Some (x,P) \<and> (x):P \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)))"
lemma ncloses_elim:
assumes a: "(x,B) \<in> set \<Gamma>"
and b: "\<theta>n ncloses \<Gamma>"
shows "\<exists>c P. \<theta>n nmaps x to Some (c,P) \<and> <c>:P \<in> (\<parallel><B>\<parallel>)"
using a b by (auto simp add: ncloses_def)
lemma ccloses_elim:
assumes a: "(a,B) \<in> set \<Delta>"
and b: "\<theta>c ccloses \<Delta>"
shows "\<exists>x P. \<theta>c cmaps a to Some (x,P) \<and> (x):P \<in> (\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>)"
using a b by (auto simp add: ccloses_def)
lemma ncloses_subset:
assumes a: "\<theta>n ncloses \<Gamma>"
and b: "set \<Gamma>' \<subseteq> set \<Gamma>"
shows "\<theta>n ncloses \<Gamma>'"
using a b by (auto simp add: ncloses_def)
lemma ccloses_subset:
assumes a: "\<theta>c ccloses \<Delta>"
and b: "set \<Delta>' \<subseteq> set \<Delta>"
shows "\<theta>c ccloses \<Delta>'"
using a b by (auto simp add: ccloses_def)
lemma validc_fresh:
fixes a::"coname"
and \<Delta>::"(coname\<times>ty) list"
assumes a: "a\<sharp>\<Delta>"
shows "\<not>(\<exists>B. (a,B)\<in>set \<Delta>)"
using a
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma validn_fresh:
fixes x::"name"
and \<Gamma>::"(name\<times>ty) list"
assumes a: "x\<sharp>\<Gamma>"
shows "\<not>(\<exists>B. (x,B)\<in>set \<Gamma>)"
using a
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma ccloses_extend:
assumes a: "\<theta>c ccloses \<Delta>" "a\<sharp>\<Delta>" "a\<sharp>\<theta>c" "(x):P\<in>\<parallel>(B)\<parallel>"
shows "(a,x,P)#\<theta>c ccloses (a,B)#\<Delta>"
using a
apply(simp add: ccloses_def)
apply(drule validc_fresh)
apply(auto)
done
lemma ncloses_extend:
assumes a: "\<theta>n ncloses \<Gamma>" "x\<sharp>\<Gamma>" "x\<sharp>\<theta>n" "<a>:P\<in>\<parallel><B>\<parallel>"
shows "(x,a,P)#\<theta>n ncloses (x,B)#\<Gamma>"
using a
apply(simp add: ncloses_def)
apply(drule validn_fresh)
apply(auto)
done
text {* typing relation *}
inductive
typing :: "ctxtn \<Rightarrow> trm \<Rightarrow> ctxtc \<Rightarrow> bool" ("_ \<turnstile> _ \<turnstile> _" [100,100,100] 100)
where
TAx: "\<lbrakk>validn \<Gamma>;validc \<Delta>; (x,B)\<in>set \<Gamma>; (a,B)\<in>set \<Delta>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> Ax x a \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
| TNotR: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>\<Gamma>; ((x,B)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>; set \<Delta>' = {(a,NOT B)}\<union>set \<Delta>; validc \<Delta>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> NotR (x).M a \<turnstile> \<Delta>'"
| TNotL: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>\<Delta>; \<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,B)#\<Delta>); set \<Gamma>' = {(x,NOT B)} \<union> set \<Gamma>; validn \<Gamma>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma>' \<turnstile> NotL <a>.M x \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
| TAndL1: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,y); ((x,B1)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>; set \<Gamma>' = {(y,B1 AND B2)} \<union> set \<Gamma>; validn \<Gamma>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma>' \<turnstile> AndL1 (x).M y \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
| TAndL2: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,y); ((x,B2)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>; set \<Gamma>' = {(y,B1 AND B2)} \<union> set \<Gamma>; validn \<Gamma>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma>' \<turnstile> AndL2 (x).M y \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
| TAndR: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(\<Delta>,N,c); b\<sharp>(\<Delta>,M,c); a\<noteq>b; \<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,B)#\<Delta>); \<Gamma> \<turnstile> N \<turnstile> ((b,C)#\<Delta>);
set \<Delta>' = {(c,B AND C)}\<union>set \<Delta>; validc \<Delta>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> AndR <a>.M <b>.N c \<turnstile> \<Delta>'"
| TOrL: "\<lbrakk>x\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,N,z); y\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,M,z); x\<noteq>y; ((x,B)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>; ((y,C)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> N \<turnstile> \<Delta>;
set \<Gamma>' = {(z,B OR C)} \<union> set \<Gamma>; validn \<Gamma>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma>' \<turnstile> OrL (x).M (y).N z \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
| TOrR1: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(\<Delta>,b); \<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,B1)#\<Delta>); set \<Delta>' = {(b,B1 OR B2)}\<union>set \<Delta>; validc \<Delta>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> OrR1 <a>.M b \<turnstile> \<Delta>'"
| TOrR2: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(\<Delta>,b); \<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,B2)#\<Delta>); set \<Delta>' = {(b,B1 OR B2)}\<union>set \<Delta>; validc \<Delta>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> OrR2 <a>.M b \<turnstile> \<Delta>'"
| TImpL: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(\<Delta>,N); x\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,M,y); \<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,B)#\<Delta>); ((x,C)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> N \<turnstile> \<Delta>;
set \<Gamma>' = {(y,B IMP C)} \<union> set \<Gamma>; validn \<Gamma>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma>' \<turnstile> ImpL <a>.M (x).N y \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
| TImpR: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(\<Delta>,b); x\<sharp>\<Gamma>; ((x,B)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,C)#\<Delta>); set \<Delta>' = {(b,B IMP C)}\<union>set \<Delta>; validc \<Delta>'\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> ImpR (x).<a>.M b \<turnstile> \<Delta>'"
| TCut: "\<lbrakk>a\<sharp>(\<Delta>,N); x\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,M); \<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> ((a,B)#\<Delta>); ((x,B)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> N \<turnstile> \<Delta>\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<Gamma> \<turnstile> Cut <a>.M (x).N \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
equivariance typing
lemma fresh_set_member:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>L \<Longrightarrow> e\<in>set L \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>e"
and "a\<sharp>L \<Longrightarrow> e\<in>set L \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>e"
by (induct L) (auto simp add: fresh_list_cons)
lemma fresh_subset:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>L \<Longrightarrow> set L' \<subseteq> set L \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>L'"
and "a\<sharp>L \<Longrightarrow> set L' \<subseteq> set L \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>L'"
apply(induct L' arbitrary: L)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_list_nil intro: fresh_set_member)
done
lemma fresh_subset_ext:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>L \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>e \<Longrightarrow> set L' \<subseteq> set (e#L) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>L'"
and "a\<sharp>L \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>e \<Longrightarrow> set L' \<subseteq> set (e#L) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>L'"
apply(induct L' arbitrary: L)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_list_nil intro: fresh_set_member)
done
lemma fresh_under_insert:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
and \<Gamma>::"ctxtn"
and \<Delta>::"ctxtc"
shows "x\<sharp>\<Gamma> \<Longrightarrow> x\<noteq>y \<Longrightarrow> set \<Gamma>' = insert (y,B) (set \<Gamma>) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>\<Gamma>'"
and "a\<sharp>\<Delta> \<Longrightarrow> a\<noteq>c \<Longrightarrow> set \<Delta>' = insert (c,B) (set \<Delta>) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>\<Delta>'"
apply(rule fresh_subset_ext(1))
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_ty)
apply(rule fresh_subset_ext(2))
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_ty)
done
nominal_inductive typing
apply (simp_all add: abs_fresh fresh_atm fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_ty fresh_ctxt
fresh_list_append abs_supp fin_supp)
apply(auto intro: fresh_under_insert)
done
lemma validn_elim:
assumes a: "validn ((x,B)#\<Gamma>)"
shows "validn \<Gamma> \<and> x\<sharp>\<Gamma>"
using a
apply(erule_tac validn.cases)
apply(auto)
done
lemma validc_elim:
assumes a: "validc ((a,B)#\<Delta>)"
shows "validc \<Delta> \<and> a\<sharp>\<Delta>"
using a
apply(erule_tac validc.cases)
apply(auto)
done
lemma context_fresh:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>\<Gamma> \<Longrightarrow> \<not>(\<exists>B. (x,B)\<in>set \<Gamma>)"
and "a\<sharp>\<Delta> \<Longrightarrow> \<not>(\<exists>B. (a,B)\<in>set \<Delta>)"
apply -
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma typing_implies_valid:
assumes a: "\<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
shows "validn \<Gamma> \<and> validc \<Delta>"
using a
apply(nominal_induct rule: typing.strong_induct)
apply(auto dest: validn_elim validc_elim)
done
lemma ty_perm:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
and B::"ty"
shows "pi1\<bullet>B=B" and "pi2\<bullet>B=B"
apply(nominal_induct B rule: ty.induct)
apply(auto simp add: perm_string)
done
lemma ctxt_perm:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
and \<Gamma>::"ctxtn"
and \<Delta>::"ctxtc"
shows "pi2\<bullet>\<Gamma>=\<Gamma>" and "pi1\<bullet>\<Delta>=\<Delta>"
apply -
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm ty_perm)
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: calc_atm ty_perm)
done
lemma typing_Ax_elim1:
assumes a: "\<Gamma> \<turnstile> Ax x a \<turnstile> ((a,B)#\<Delta>)"
shows "(x,B)\<in>set \<Gamma>"
using a
apply(erule_tac typing.cases)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto)
apply(auto dest: validc_elim context_fresh)
done
lemma typing_Ax_elim2:
assumes a: "((x,B)#\<Gamma>) \<turnstile> Ax x a \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
shows "(a,B)\<in>set \<Delta>"
using a
apply(erule_tac typing.cases)
apply(simp_all add: trm.inject)
apply(auto dest!: validn_elim context_fresh)
done
lemma psubst_Ax_aux:
assumes a: "\<theta>c cmaps a to Some (y,N)"
shows "lookupb x a \<theta>c c P = Cut <c>.P (y).N"
using a
apply(induct \<theta>c)
apply(auto)
done
lemma psubst_Ax:
assumes a: "\<theta>n nmaps x to Some (c,P)"
and b: "\<theta>c cmaps a to Some (y,N)"
shows "\<theta>n,\<theta>c<Ax x a> = Cut <c>.P (y).N"
using a b
apply(induct \<theta>n)
apply(auto simp add: psubst_Ax_aux)
done
lemma psubst_Cut:
assumes a: "\<forall>x. M\<noteq>Ax x c"
and b: "\<forall>a. N\<noteq>Ax x a"
and c: "c\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c,N)" "x\<sharp>(\<theta>n,\<theta>c,M)"
shows "\<theta>n,\<theta>c<Cut <c>.M (x).N> = Cut <c>.(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>) (x).(\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>)"
using a b c
apply(simp)
done
lemma all_CAND:
assumes a: "\<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
and b: "\<theta>n ncloses \<Gamma>"
and c: "\<theta>c ccloses \<Delta>"
shows "SNa (\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>)"
using a b c
proof(nominal_induct avoiding: \<theta>n \<theta>c rule: typing.strong_induct)
case (TAx \<Gamma> \<Delta> x B a \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply -
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(erule conjE)+
apply(rule_tac s="Cut <c>.P (xa).Pa" and t="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<Ax x a>" in subst)
apply(rule sym)
apply(simp only: psubst_Ax)
apply(simp add: CUT_SNa)
done
next
case (TNotR x \<Gamma> B M \<Delta> \<Delta>' a \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(a,NOT B) \<in> set \<Delta>'")
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="NOT B" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="(x,aa,Pa)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TNotL a \<Delta> \<Gamma> M B \<Gamma>' x \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(x,NOT B) \<in> set \<Gamma>'")
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="NOT B" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule NEG_intro)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="ca" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TAndL1 x \<Gamma> y B1 M \<Delta> \<Gamma>' B2 \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(y,B1 AND B2) \<in> set \<Gamma>'")
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B1 AND B2" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule NEG_intro)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="ca" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="(x,a,Pa)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TAndL2 x \<Gamma> y B2 M \<Delta> \<Gamma>' B1 \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(y,B1 AND B2) \<in> set \<Gamma>'")
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B1 AND B2" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule NEG_intro)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="ca" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="(x,a,Pa)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TAndR a \<Delta> N c b M \<Gamma> B C \<Delta>' \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(c,B AND C) \<in> set \<Delta>'")
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B AND C" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="ca" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="b" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(b,xa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TOrL x \<Gamma> N z y M B \<Delta> C \<Gamma>' \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(z,B OR C) \<in> set \<Gamma>'")
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B OR C" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule NEG_intro)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="ca" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="(x,a,Pa)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule_tac x="y" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(rotate_tac 14)
apply(drule_tac x="(y,a,Pa)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TOrR1 a \<Delta> b \<Gamma> M B1 \<Delta>' B2 \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(b,B1 OR B2) \<in> set \<Delta>'")
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B1 OR B2" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI1)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TOrR2 a \<Delta> b \<Gamma> M B2 \<Delta>' B1 \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(b,B1 OR B2) \<in> set \<Delta>'")
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B1 OR B2" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TImpL a \<Delta> N x \<Gamma> M y B C \<Gamma>' \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(y,B IMP C) \<in> set \<Gamma>'")
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B IMP C" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule NEG_intro)
apply(simp (no_asm))
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="ca" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp del: NEGc.simps add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(rotate_tac 12)
apply(drule_tac x="(x,aa,Pa)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(rule ncloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TImpR a \<Delta> b x \<Gamma> B M C \<Delta>' \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(b,B IMP C) \<in> set \<Delta>'")
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(simp)
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B IMP C" in CUT_SNa)
apply(simp)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule disjI2)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="c" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule conjI)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_csubst[symmetric])
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,((a,z,Pa)#\<theta>c)<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(rule_tac t="\<theta>n,((a,z,Pa)#\<theta>c)<M>{x:=<aa>.Pb}" and
s="((x,aa,Pb)#\<theta>n),((a,z,Pa)#\<theta>c)<M>" in subst)
apply(rule psubst_nsubst)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_cons)
apply(drule_tac x="(x,aa,Pb)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,z,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(auto intro: fresh_subset simp del: NEGc.simps)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric])
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="((x,ca,Q)#\<theta>n),\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(rule_tac t="((x,ca,Q)#\<theta>n),\<theta>c<M>{a:=(xaa).Pa}" and
s="((x,ca,Q)#\<theta>n),((a,xaa,Pa)#\<theta>c)<M>" in subst)
apply(rule psubst_csubst)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_cons)
apply(drule_tac x="(x,ca,Q)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xaa,Pa)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(rule ccloses_subset)
apply(assumption)
apply(blast)
apply(auto intro: fresh_subset simp del: NEGc.simps)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(blast)
done
next
case (TCut a \<Delta> N x \<Gamma> M B \<theta>n \<theta>c)
then show ?case
apply -
apply(case_tac "\<forall>y. M\<noteq>Ax y a")
apply(case_tac "\<forall>c. N\<noteq>Ax x c")
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac B="B" in CUT_SNa)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)
apply(rule allI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_csubst[symmetric]) (*?*)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,P)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)
apply(rule allI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric]) (*?*)
apply(rotate_tac 11)
apply(drule_tac x="(x,aa,P)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule_tac meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
(* cases at least one axiom *)
apply(simp (no_asm_use))
apply(erule exE)
apply(simp del: psubst.simps)
apply(drule typing_Ax_elim2)
apply(auto simp add: trm.inject)[1]
apply(rule_tac B="B" in CUT_SNa)
(* left term *)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGc_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="a" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<M>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)+
apply(rule impI)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="(a,xa,P)#\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ccloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp add: psubst_csubst[symmetric]) (*?*)
(* right term -axiom *)
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule_tac y="x" in lookupd_cmaps)
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(x):P[xa\<turnstile>n>x] = (xa):P")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: ntrm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
(* M is axiom *)
apply(simp)
apply(auto)[1]
(* both are axioms *)
apply(rule_tac B="B" in CUT_SNa)
apply(drule typing_Ax_elim1)
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule_tac a="a" in lookupc_nmaps)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "<a>:P[c\<turnstile>c>a] = <c>:P")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: ctrm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
apply(drule typing_Ax_elim2)
apply(drule ccloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule_tac y="x" in lookupd_cmaps)
apply(drule cmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "(x):P[xa\<turnstile>n>x] = (xa):P")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: ntrm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule nrename_swap)
apply(simp)
(* N is not axioms *)
apply(rule_tac B="B" in CUT_SNa)
(* left term *)
apply(drule typing_Ax_elim1)
apply(drule ncloses_elim)
apply(assumption)
apply(erule exE)+
apply(erule conjE)
apply(frule_tac a="a" in lookupc_nmaps)
apply(drule_tac a="a" in nmaps_fresh)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "<a>:P[c\<turnstile>c>a] = <c>:P")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: ctrm.inject)
apply(simp add: alpha fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule sym)
apply(rule crename_swap)
apply(simp)
apply(rule BINDING_implies_CAND)
apply(unfold BINDINGn_def)
apply(simp)
apply(rule_tac x="x" in exI)
apply(rule_tac x="\<theta>n,\<theta>c<N>" in exI)
apply(simp)
apply(rule allI)
apply(rule allI)
apply(rule impI)
apply(simp add: psubst_nsubst[symmetric]) (*?*)
apply(rotate_tac 10)
apply(drule_tac x="(x,aa,P)#\<theta>n" in meta_spec)
apply(drule_tac x="\<theta>c" in meta_spec)
apply(drule meta_mp)
apply(rule ncloses_extend)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
apply(drule_tac meta_mp)
apply(assumption)
apply(assumption)
done
qed
consts
"idn" :: "(name\<times>ty) list\<Rightarrow>coname\<Rightarrow>(name\<times>coname\<times>trm) list"
primrec
"idn [] a = []"
"idn (p#\<Gamma>) a = ((fst p),a,Ax (fst p) a)#(idn \<Gamma> a)"
consts
"idc" :: "(coname\<times>ty) list\<Rightarrow>name\<Rightarrow>(coname\<times>name\<times>trm) list"
primrec
"idc [] x = []"
"idc (p#\<Delta>) x = ((fst p),x,Ax x (fst p))#(idc \<Delta> x)"
lemma idn_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(idn \<Gamma> a)) = idn (pi1\<bullet>\<Gamma>) (pi1\<bullet>a)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(idn \<Gamma> a)) = idn (pi2\<bullet>\<Gamma>) (pi2\<bullet>a)"
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto)
done
lemma idc_eqvt[eqvt]:
fixes pi1::"name prm"
and pi2::"coname prm"
shows "(pi1\<bullet>(idc \<Delta> x)) = idc (pi1\<bullet>\<Delta>) (pi1\<bullet>x)"
and "(pi2\<bullet>(idc \<Delta> x)) = idc (pi2\<bullet>\<Delta>) (pi2\<bullet>x)"
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto)
done
lemma ccloses_id:
shows "(idc \<Delta> x) ccloses \<Delta>"
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: ccloses_def)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
done
lemma ncloses_id:
shows "(idn \<Gamma> a) ncloses \<Gamma>"
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: ncloses_def)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
apply(rule Ax_in_CANDs)
done
lemma fresh_idn:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>\<Gamma> \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> a"
and "a\<sharp>(\<Gamma>,b) \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> b"
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_list_nil fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
lemma fresh_idc:
fixes x::"name"
and a::"coname"
shows "x\<sharp>(\<Delta>,y) \<Longrightarrow> x\<sharp>idc \<Delta> y"
and "a\<sharp>\<Delta> \<Longrightarrow> a\<sharp>idc \<Delta> y"
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_list_nil fresh_atm fresh_prod)
done
lemma idc_cmaps:
assumes a: "idc \<Delta> y cmaps b to Some (x,M)"
shows "M=Ax x b"
using a
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "b=a")
apply(auto)
done
lemma idn_nmaps:
assumes a: "idn \<Gamma> a nmaps x to Some (b,M)"
shows "M=Ax x b"
using a
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto)
apply(case_tac "aa=x")
apply(auto)
done
lemma lookup1:
assumes a: "x\<sharp>(idn \<Gamma> b)"
shows "lookup x a (idn \<Gamma> b) \<theta>c = lookupa x a \<theta>c"
using a
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookup2:
assumes a: "\<not>(x\<sharp>(idn \<Gamma> b))"
shows "lookup x a (idn \<Gamma> b) \<theta>c = lookupb x a \<theta>c b (Ax x b)"
using a
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_nil)
done
lemma lookup3:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(idc \<Delta> y)"
shows "lookupa x a (idc \<Delta> y) = Ax x a"
using a
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm)
done
lemma lookup4:
assumes a: "\<not>(a\<sharp>(idc \<Delta> y))"
shows "lookupa x a (idc \<Delta> y) = Cut <a>.(Ax x a) (y).Ax y a"
using a
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_nil)
done
lemma lookup5:
assumes a: "a\<sharp>(idc \<Delta> y)"
shows "lookupb x a (idc \<Delta> y) c P = Cut <c>.P (x).Ax x a"
using a
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_nil)
done
lemma lookup6:
assumes a: "\<not>(a\<sharp>(idc \<Delta> y))"
shows "lookupb x a (idc \<Delta> y) c P = Cut <c>.P (y).Ax y a"
using a
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_nil)
done
lemma lookup7:
shows "lookupc x a (idn \<Gamma> b) = Ax x a"
apply(induct \<Gamma>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_nil)
done
lemma lookup8:
shows "lookupd x a (idc \<Delta> y) = Ax x a"
apply(induct \<Delta>)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_list_cons fresh_prod fresh_atm fresh_list_nil)
done
lemma id_redu:
shows "(idn \<Gamma> x),(idc \<Delta> a)<M> \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M"
apply(nominal_induct M avoiding: \<Gamma> \<Delta> x a rule: trm.induct)
apply(auto)
(* Ax *)
apply(case_tac "name\<sharp>(idn \<Gamma> x)")
apply(simp add: lookup1)
apply(case_tac "coname\<sharp>(idc \<Delta> a)")
apply(simp add: lookup3)
apply(simp add: lookup4)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: lookup2)
apply(case_tac "coname\<sharp>(idc \<Delta> a)")
apply(simp add: lookup5)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: lookup6)
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp)
(* Cut *)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc psubst_fresh_name psubst_fresh_coname fresh_atm fresh_prod )[1]
apply(simp add: lookup7 lookup8)
apply(simp add: lookup7 lookup8)
apply(simp add: a_star_Cut)
apply(simp add: lookup7 lookup8)
apply(simp add: a_star_Cut)
apply(simp add: a_star_Cut)
(* NotR *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findc (idc \<Delta> a) coname")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_NotR)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idc_cmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp add: crename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_NotR)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* NotL *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findn (idn \<Gamma> x) name")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_NotL)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idn_nmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(assumption)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_NotL)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* AndR *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findc (idc \<Delta> a) coname3")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_AndR)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idc_cmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm1>")
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm2>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc psubst_fresh_name crename_fresh fresh_atm fresh_prod )[1]
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: crename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_AndR)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* AndL1 *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findn (idn \<Gamma> x) name2")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_AndL1)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idn_nmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_AndL1)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* AndL2 *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findn (idn \<Gamma> x) name2")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_AndL2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idn_nmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_AndL2)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* OrR1 *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findc (idc \<Delta> a) coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_OrR1)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idc_cmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: crename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_OrR1)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* OrR2 *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findc (idc \<Delta> a) coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_OrR2)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idc_cmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: crename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_OrR2)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* OrL *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findn (idn \<Gamma> x) name3")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_OrL)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idn_nmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm1>")
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm2>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_OrL)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* ImpR *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findc (idc \<Delta> a) coname2")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_ImpR)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "coname")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idc_cmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxR_intro)
apply(rule fic.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule crename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: crename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_ImpR)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
(* ImpL *)
apply(simp add: fresh_idn fresh_idc)
apply(case_tac "findn (idn \<Gamma> x) name2")
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: a_star_ImpL)
apply(auto)[1]
apply(generate_fresh "name")
apply(fresh_fun_simp)
apply(drule idn_nmaps)
apply(simp)
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm1>")
apply(subgoal_tac "c\<sharp>idn \<Gamma> x,idc \<Delta> a<trm2>")
apply(rule a_star_trans)
apply(rule a_starI)
apply(rule al_redu)
apply(rule better_LAxL_intro)
apply(rule fin.intros)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(simp add: abs_fresh)
apply(rule aux3)
apply(rule nrename.simps)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule psubst_fresh_coname)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp add: fresh_atm)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(auto simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)[1]
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp add: fresh_prod fresh_atm)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(simp add: nrename_fresh)
apply(simp add: a_star_ImpL)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
apply(rule psubst_fresh_name)
apply(rule fresh_idn)
apply(simp)
apply(rule fresh_idc)
apply(simp)
apply(simp)
done
theorem ALL_SNa:
assumes a: "\<Gamma> \<turnstile> M \<turnstile> \<Delta>"
shows "SNa M"
proof -
have "(idc \<Delta> x) ccloses \<Delta>" by (simp add: ccloses_id)
moreover
have "(idn \<Gamma> a) ncloses \<Gamma>" by (simp add: ncloses_id)
ultimately have "SNa ((idn \<Gamma> a),(idc \<Delta> x)<M>)" using a by (simp add: all_CAND)
moreover
have "((idn \<Gamma> a),(idc \<Delta> x)<M>) \<longrightarrow>\<^isub>a* M" by (simp add: id_redu)
ultimately show "SNa M" by (simp add: a_star_preserves_SNa)
qed
end