(* ID: $Id$
Author: L C Paulson and Claire Quigley
Copyright 2004 University of Cambridge
*)
(***************************************************************************)
(* Code to deal with the transfer of proofs from a prover process *)
(***************************************************************************)
signature RES_RECONSTRUCT =
sig
val checkEProofFound:
TextIO.instream * TextIO.outstream * Posix.Process.pid *
string * Proof.context * thm * int * string Vector.vector -> bool
val checkVampProofFound:
TextIO.instream * TextIO.outstream * Posix.Process.pid *
string * Proof.context * thm * int * string Vector.vector -> bool
val checkSpassProofFound:
TextIO.instream * TextIO.outstream * Posix.Process.pid *
string * Proof.context * thm * int * string Vector.vector -> bool
val signal_parent:
TextIO.outstream * Posix.Process.pid * string * string -> unit
end;
structure ResReconstruct =
struct
val trace_path = Path.basic "atp_trace";
fun trace s = if !Output.debugging then File.append (File.tmp_path trace_path) s
else ();
(*Full proof reconstruction wanted*)
val full = ref true;
val recon_sorts = ref false;
val modulus = ref 1; (*keep every nth proof line*)
(**** PARSING OF TSTP FORMAT ****)
(*Syntax trees, either termlist or formulae*)
datatype stree = Int of int | Br of string * stree list;
fun atom x = Br(x,[]);
fun scons (x,y) = Br("cons", [x,y]);
val listof = foldl scons (atom "nil");
(*Strings enclosed in single quotes, e.g. filenames*)
val quoted = $$"'" |-- Scan.repeat (~$$"'") --| $$"'" >> implode;
(*Intended for $true and $false*)
fun tf s = "c_" ^ str (Char.toUpper (String.sub(s,0))) ^ String.extract(s,1,NONE);
val truefalse = $$"$" |-- Symbol.scan_id >> (atom o tf);
(*Integer constants, typically proof line numbers*)
fun is_digit s = Char.isDigit (String.sub(s,0));
val integer = Scan.many1 is_digit >> (valOf o Int.fromString o implode);
(*Generalized FO terms, which include filenames, numbers, etc.*)
fun termlist x = (term -- Scan.repeat ($$"," |-- term) >> op::) x
and term x = (quoted >> atom || integer>>Int || truefalse ||
Symbol.scan_id -- Scan.optional ($$"(" |-- termlist --| $$")") [] >> Br ||
$$"(" |-- term --| $$")" ||
$$"[" |-- termlist --| $$"]" >> listof) x;
fun negate t = Br("c_Not", [t]);
fun equate (t1,t2) = Br("c_equal", [t1,t2]);
(*Apply equal or not-equal to a term*)
fun syn_equal (t, NONE) = t
| syn_equal (t1, SOME (NONE, t2)) = equate (t1,t2)
| syn_equal (t1, SOME (SOME _, t2)) = negate (equate (t1,t2));
(*Literals can involve negation, = and !=.*)
val literal = $$"~" |-- term >> negate ||
(term -- Scan.option (Scan.option ($$"!") --| $$"=" -- term) >> syn_equal) ;
val literals = literal -- Scan.repeat ($$"|" |-- literal) >> op:: ;
(*Clause: a list of literals separated by the disjunction sign*)
val clause = $$"(" |-- literals --| $$")";
val annotations = $$"," |-- term -- Scan.option ($$"," |-- termlist);
(*<cnf_annotated> ::=Ęcnf(<name>,<formula_role>,<cnf_formula><annotations>).
The <name> could be an identifier, but we assume integers.*)
val tstp_line = (Scan.this_string "cnf" -- $$"(") |--
integer --| $$"," -- Symbol.scan_id --| $$"," --
clause -- Scan.option annotations --| $$ ")";
(**** DUPLICATE of Susanto's code to remove ASCII armouring from names in proof files ****)
(*original file: Isabelle_ext.sml*)
val A_min_spc = Char.ord #"A" - Char.ord #" ";
fun cList2int chs = getOpt (Int.fromString (String.implode (rev chs)), 0);
(*why such a tiny range?*)
fun check_valid_int x =
let val val_x = cList2int x
in (length x = 3) andalso (val_x >= 123) andalso (val_x <= 126)
end;
fun normalise_s s [] st_ sti =
String.implode(rev(
if st_
then if null sti
then (#"_" :: s)
else if check_valid_int sti
then (Char.chr (cList2int sti) :: s)
else (sti @ (#"_" :: s))
else s))
| normalise_s s (#"_"::cs) st_ sti =
if st_
then let val s' = if null sti
then (#"_"::s)
else if check_valid_int sti
then (Char.chr (cList2int sti) :: s)
else (sti @ (#"_" :: s))
in normalise_s s' cs false []
end
else normalise_s s cs true []
| normalise_s s (c::cs) true sti =
if (Char.isDigit c)
then normalise_s s cs true (c::sti)
else let val s' = if null sti
then if ((c >= #"A") andalso (c<= #"P"))
then ((Char.chr(Char.ord c - A_min_spc))::s)
else (c :: (#"_" :: s))
else if check_valid_int sti
then (Char.chr (cList2int sti) :: s)
else (sti @ (#"_" :: s))
in normalise_s s' cs false []
end
| normalise_s s (c::cs) _ _ = normalise_s (c::s) cs false [];
(*This version does not look for standard prefixes first.*)
fun normalise_string s = normalise_s [] (String.explode s) false [];
(**** INTERPRETATION OF TSTP SYNTAX TREES ****)
exception STREE of stree;
(*If string s has the prefix s1, return the result of deleting it.*)
fun strip_prefix s1 s =
if String.isPrefix s1 s then SOME (normalise_string (String.extract (s, size s1, NONE)))
else NONE;
(*Invert the table of translations between Isabelle and ATPs*)
val type_const_trans_table_inv =
Symtab.make (map swap (Symtab.dest ResClause.type_const_trans_table));
fun invert_type_const c =
case Symtab.lookup type_const_trans_table_inv c of
SOME c' => c'
| NONE => c;
fun make_tvar b = TVar(("'" ^ b, 0), HOLogic.typeS);
fun make_var (b,T) = Var((b,0),T);
(*Type variables are given the basic sort, HOL.type. Some will later be constrained
by information from type literals, or by type inference.*)
fun type_of_stree t =
case t of
Int _ => raise STREE t
| Br (a,ts) =>
let val Ts = map type_of_stree ts
in
case strip_prefix ResClause.tconst_prefix a of
SOME b => Type(invert_type_const b, Ts)
| NONE =>
if not (null ts) then raise STREE t (*only tconsts have type arguments*)
else
case strip_prefix ResClause.tfree_prefix a of
SOME b => TFree("'" ^ b, HOLogic.typeS)
| NONE =>
case strip_prefix ResClause.tvar_prefix a of
SOME b => make_tvar b
| NONE => make_tvar a (*Variable from the ATP, say X1*)
end;
(*Invert the table of translations between Isabelle and ATPs*)
val const_trans_table_inv =
Symtab.update ("fequal", "op =")
(Symtab.make (map swap (Symtab.dest ResClause.const_trans_table)));
fun invert_const c =
case Symtab.lookup const_trans_table_inv c of
SOME c' => c'
| NONE => c;
(*The number of type arguments of a constant, zero if it's monomorphic*)
fun num_typargs thy s = length (Sign.const_typargs thy (s, Sign.the_const_type thy s));
(*Generates a constant, given its type arguments*)
fun const_of thy (a,Ts) = Const(a, Sign.const_instance thy (a,Ts));
(*First-order translation. No types are known for variables. HOLogic.typeT should allow
them to be inferred.*)
fun term_of_stree args thy t =
case t of
Int _ => raise STREE t
| Br ("hBOOL",[t]) => term_of_stree [] thy t (*ignore hBOOL*)
| Br ("hAPP",[t,u]) => term_of_stree (u::args) thy t
| Br (a,ts) =>
case strip_prefix ResClause.const_prefix a of
SOME "equal" =>
list_comb(Const ("op =", HOLogic.typeT), List.map (term_of_stree [] thy) ts)
| SOME b =>
let val c = invert_const b
val nterms = length ts - num_typargs thy c
val us = List.map (term_of_stree [] thy) (List.take(ts,nterms) @ args)
(*Extra args from hAPP come AFTER any arguments given directly to the
constant.*)
val Ts = List.map type_of_stree (List.drop(ts,nterms))
in list_comb(const_of thy (c, Ts), us) end
| NONE => (*a variable, not a constant*)
let val T = HOLogic.typeT
val opr = (*a Free variable is typically a Skolem function*)
case strip_prefix ResClause.fixed_var_prefix a of
SOME b => Free(b,T)
| NONE =>
case strip_prefix ResClause.schematic_var_prefix a of
SOME b => make_var (b,T)
| NONE => make_var (a,T) (*Variable from the ATP, say X1*)
in list_comb (opr, List.map (term_of_stree [] thy) (ts@args)) end;
(*Type class literal applied to a type. Returns triple of polarity, class, type.*)
fun constraint_of_stree pol (Br("c_Not",[t])) = constraint_of_stree (not pol) t
| constraint_of_stree pol t = case t of
Int _ => raise STREE t
| Br (a,ts) =>
(case (strip_prefix ResClause.class_prefix a, map type_of_stree ts) of
(SOME b, [T]) => (pol, b, T)
| _ => raise STREE t);
(** Accumulate type constraints in a clause: negative type literals **)
fun addix (key,z) = Vartab.map_default (key,[]) (cons z);
fun add_constraint ((false, cl, TFree(a,_)), vt) = addix ((a,~1),cl) vt
| add_constraint ((false, cl, TVar(ix,_)), vt) = addix (ix,cl) vt
| add_constraint (_, vt) = vt;
(*False literals (which E includes in its proofs) are deleted*)
val nofalses = filter (not o equal HOLogic.false_const);
(*Final treatment of the list of "real" literals from a clause.*)
fun finish [] = HOLogic.true_const (*No "real" literals means only type information*)
| finish lits =
case nofalses lits of
[] => HOLogic.false_const (*The empty clause, since we started with real literals*)
| xs => foldr1 HOLogic.mk_disj (rev xs);
(*Accumulate sort constraints in vt, with "real" literals in lits.*)
fun lits_of_strees ctxt (vt, lits) [] = (vt, finish lits)
| lits_of_strees ctxt (vt, lits) (t::ts) =
lits_of_strees ctxt (add_constraint (constraint_of_stree true t, vt), lits) ts
handle STREE _ =>
lits_of_strees ctxt (vt, term_of_stree [] (ProofContext.theory_of ctxt) t :: lits) ts;
(*Update TVars/TFrees with detected sort constraints.*)
fun fix_sorts vt =
let fun tysubst (Type (a, Ts)) = Type (a, map tysubst Ts)
| tysubst (TVar (xi, s)) = TVar (xi, getOpt (Vartab.lookup vt xi, s))
| tysubst (TFree (x, s)) = TFree (x, getOpt (Vartab.lookup vt (x,~1), s))
fun tmsubst (Const (a, T)) = Const (a, tysubst T)
| tmsubst (Free (a, T)) = Free (a, tysubst T)
| tmsubst (Var (xi, T)) = Var (xi, tysubst T)
| tmsubst (t as Bound _) = t
| tmsubst (Abs (a, T, t)) = Abs (a, tysubst T, tmsubst t)
| tmsubst (t $ u) = tmsubst t $ tmsubst u;
in fn t => if Vartab.is_empty vt then t else tmsubst t end;
(*Interpret a list of syntax trees as a clause, given by "real" literals and sort constraints.
vt0 holds the initial sort constraints, from the conjecture clauses.*)
fun clause_of_strees ctxt vt0 ts =
let val (vt, dt) = lits_of_strees ctxt (vt0,[]) ts in
singleton (ProofContext.infer_types ctxt) (TypeInfer.constrain (fix_sorts vt dt) HOLogic.boolT)
end;
(*Quantification over a list of Vars. FIXME: for term.ML??*)
fun list_all_var ([], t: term) = t
| list_all_var ((v as Var(ix,T)) :: vars, t) =
(all T) $ Abs(string_of_indexname ix, T, abstract_over (v, list_all_var (vars,t)));
fun gen_all_vars t = list_all_var (term_vars t, t);
fun ints_of_stree_aux (Int n, ns) = n::ns
| ints_of_stree_aux (Br(_,ts), ns) = foldl ints_of_stree_aux ns ts;
fun ints_of_stree t = ints_of_stree_aux (t, []);
fun decode_tstp ctxt vt0 (name, role, ts, annots) =
let val deps = case annots of NONE => [] | SOME (source,_) => ints_of_stree source
in (name, role, clause_of_strees ctxt vt0 ts, deps) end;
fun dest_tstp ((((name, role), ts), annots), chs) =
case chs of
"."::_ => (name, role, ts, annots)
| _ => error ("TSTP line not terminated by \".\": " ^ implode chs);
(** Global sort constraints on TFrees (from tfree_tcs) are positive unit clauses. **)
fun add_tfree_constraint ((true, cl, TFree(a,_)), vt) = addix ((a,~1),cl) vt
| add_tfree_constraint (_, vt) = vt;
fun tfree_constraints_of_clauses vt [] = vt
| tfree_constraints_of_clauses vt ([lit]::tss) =
(tfree_constraints_of_clauses (add_tfree_constraint (constraint_of_stree true lit, vt)) tss
handle STREE _ => (*not a positive type constraint: ignore*)
tfree_constraints_of_clauses vt tss)
| tfree_constraints_of_clauses vt (_::tss) = tfree_constraints_of_clauses vt tss;
(**** Translation of TSTP files to Isar Proofs ****)
fun decode_tstp_list ctxt tuples =
let val vt0 = tfree_constraints_of_clauses Vartab.empty (map #3 tuples)
in map (decode_tstp ctxt vt0) tuples end;
(*FIXME: simmilar function in res_atp. Move to HOLogic?*)
fun dest_disj_aux (Const ("op |", _) $ t $ t') disjs = dest_disj_aux t (dest_disj_aux t' disjs)
| dest_disj_aux t disjs = t::disjs;
fun dest_disj t = dest_disj_aux t [];
(** Finding a matching assumption. The literals may be permuted, and variable names
may disagree. We have to try all combinations of literals (quadratic!) and
match up the variable names consistently. **)
fun strip_alls_aux n (Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) =
strip_alls_aux (n+1) (subst_bound (Var ((a,n), T), t))
| strip_alls_aux _ t = t;
val strip_alls = strip_alls_aux 0;
exception MATCH_LITERAL;
(*Ignore types: they are not to be trusted...*)
fun match_literal (t1$u1) (t2$u2) env =
match_literal t1 t2 (match_literal u1 u2 env)
| match_literal (Abs (_,_,t1)) (Abs (_,_,t2)) env =
match_literal t1 t2 env
| match_literal (Bound i1) (Bound i2) env =
if i1=i2 then env else raise MATCH_LITERAL
| match_literal (Const(a1,_)) (Const(a2,_)) env =
if a1=a2 then env else raise MATCH_LITERAL
| match_literal (Free(a1,_)) (Free(a2,_)) env =
if a1=a2 then env else raise MATCH_LITERAL
| match_literal (Var(ix1,_)) (Var(ix2,_)) env = insert (op =) (ix1,ix2) env
| match_literal _ _ env = raise MATCH_LITERAL;
(*Checking that all variable associations are unique. The list env contains no
repetitions, but does it contain say (x,y) and (y,y)? *)
fun good env =
let val (xs,ys) = ListPair.unzip env
in not (has_duplicates (op=) xs orelse has_duplicates (op=) ys) end;
(*Match one list of literals against another, ignoring types and the order of
literals. Sorting is unreliable because we don't have types or variable names.*)
fun matches_aux _ [] [] = true
| matches_aux env (lit::lits) ts =
let fun match1 us [] = false
| match1 us (t::ts) =
let val env' = match_literal lit t env
in (good env' andalso matches_aux env' lits (us@ts)) orelse
match1 (t::us) ts
end
handle MATCH_LITERAL => match1 (t::us) ts
in match1 [] ts end;
(*Is this length test useful?*)
fun matches (lits1,lits2) =
length lits1 = length lits2 andalso
matches_aux [] (map Envir.eta_contract lits1) (map Envir.eta_contract lits2);
fun permuted_clause t =
let val lits = dest_disj t
fun perm [] = NONE
| perm (ctm::ctms) =
if matches (lits, dest_disj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (strip_alls ctm)))
then SOME ctm else perm ctms
in perm end;
fun have_or_show "show " lname = "show \""
| have_or_show have lname = have ^ lname ^ ": \""
(*ctms is a list of conjecture clauses as yielded by Isabelle. Those returned by the
ATP may have their literals reordered.*)
fun isar_lines ctxt ctms =
let val string_of = ProofContext.string_of_term ctxt
fun doline have (lname, t, []) = (*No deps: it's a conjecture clause, with no proof.*)
(case permuted_clause t ctms of
SOME u => "assume " ^ lname ^ ": \"" ^ string_of u ^ "\"\n"
| NONE => "assume? " ^ lname ^ ": \"" ^ string_of t ^ "\"\n") (*no match!!*)
| doline have (lname, t, deps) =
have_or_show have lname ^ string_of (gen_all_vars (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)) ^
"\"\n by (metis " ^ space_implode " " deps ^ ")\n"
fun dolines [(lname, t, deps)] = [doline "show " (lname, t, deps)]
| dolines ((lname, t, deps)::lines) = doline "have " (lname, t, deps) :: dolines lines
in setmp show_sorts (!recon_sorts) dolines end;
fun notequal t (_,t',_) = not (t aconv t');
(*No "real" literals means only type information*)
fun eq_types t = t aconv HOLogic.true_const;
fun replace_dep (old:int, new) dep = if dep=old then new else [dep];
fun replace_deps (old:int, new) (lno, t, deps) =
(lno, t, foldl (op union_int) [] (map (replace_dep (old, new)) deps));
(*Discard axioms; consolidate adjacent lines that prove the same clause, since they differ
only in type information.*)
fun add_prfline ((lno, "axiom", t, []), lines) = (*axioms are not proof lines*)
if eq_types t (*must be clsrel/clsarity: type information, so delete refs to it*)
then map (replace_deps (lno, [])) lines
else
(case take_prefix (notequal t) lines of
(_,[]) => lines (*no repetition of proof line*)
| (pre, (lno',t',deps')::post) => (*repetition: replace later line by earlier one*)
pre @ map (replace_deps (lno', [lno])) post)
| add_prfline ((lno, role, t, []), lines) = (*no deps: conjecture clause*)
(lno, t, []) :: lines
| add_prfline ((lno, role, t, deps), lines) =
if eq_types t then (lno, t, deps) :: lines
(*Type information will be deleted later; skip repetition test.*)
else (*FIXME: Doesn't this code risk conflating proofs involving different types??*)
case take_prefix (notequal t) lines of
(_,[]) => (lno, t, deps) :: lines (*no repetition of proof line*)
| (pre, (lno',t',deps')::post) =>
(lno, t', deps) :: (*repetition: replace later line by earlier one*)
(pre @ map (replace_deps (lno', [lno])) post);
(*Recursively delete empty lines (type information) from the proof.*)
fun add_nonnull_prfline ((lno, t, []), lines) = (*no dependencies, so a conjecture clause*)
if eq_types t (*must be type information, tfree_tcs, clsrel, clsarity: delete refs to it*)
then delete_dep lno lines
else (lno, t, []) :: lines
| add_nonnull_prfline ((lno, t, deps), lines) = (lno, t, deps) :: lines
and delete_dep lno lines = foldr add_nonnull_prfline [] (map (replace_deps (lno, [])) lines);
fun bad_free (Free (a,_)) = String.isPrefix "llabs_" a orelse String.isPrefix "sko_" a
| bad_free _ = false;
(*TVars are forbidden in goals. Also, we don't want lines with <2 dependencies.
To further compress proofs, setting modulus:=n deletes every nth line, and nlines
counts the number of proof lines processed so far.
Deleted lines are replaced by their own dependencies. Note that the "add_nonnull_prfline"
phase may delete some dependencies, hence this phase comes later.*)
fun add_wanted_prfline ((lno, t, []), (nlines, lines)) =
(nlines, (lno, t, []) :: lines) (*conjecture clauses must be kept*)
| add_wanted_prfline (line, (nlines, [])) = (nlines, [line]) (*final line must be kept*)
| add_wanted_prfline ((lno, t, deps), (nlines, lines)) =
if eq_types t orelse not (null (term_tvars t)) orelse
length deps < 2 orelse nlines mod !modulus <> 0 orelse
exists bad_free (term_frees t)
then (nlines+1, map (replace_deps (lno, deps)) lines) (*Delete line*)
else (nlines+1, (lno, t, deps) :: lines);
(*Replace numeric proof lines by strings, either from thm_names or sequential line numbers*)
fun stringify_deps thm_names deps_map [] = []
| stringify_deps thm_names deps_map ((lno, t, deps) :: lines) =
if lno <= Vector.length thm_names (*axiom*)
then (Vector.sub(thm_names,lno-1), t, []) :: stringify_deps thm_names deps_map lines
else let val lname = Int.toString (length deps_map)
fun fix lno = if lno <= Vector.length thm_names
then SOME(Vector.sub(thm_names,lno-1))
else AList.lookup op= deps_map lno;
in (lname, t, List.mapPartial fix (distinct (op=) deps)) ::
stringify_deps thm_names ((lno,lname)::deps_map) lines
end;
val proofstart = "\nproof (neg_clausify)\n";
fun isar_header [] = proofstart
| isar_header ts = proofstart ^ "fix " ^ space_implode " " ts ^ "\n";
fun decode_tstp_file cnfs ctxt th sgno thm_names =
let val tuples = map (dest_tstp o tstp_line o explode) cnfs
val nonnull_lines =
foldr add_nonnull_prfline []
(foldr add_prfline [] (decode_tstp_list ctxt tuples))
val (_,lines) = foldr add_wanted_prfline (0,[]) nonnull_lines
val (ccls,fixes) = ResAxioms.neg_conjecture_clauses th sgno
val ccls = map forall_intr_vars ccls
in
app (fn th => Output.debug (fn () => string_of_thm th)) ccls;
isar_header (map #1 fixes) ^
String.concat (isar_lines ctxt (map prop_of ccls) (stringify_deps thm_names [] lines))
end;
(*Could use split_lines, but it can return blank lines...*)
val lines = String.tokens (equal #"\n");
val nospaces = String.translate (fn c => if Char.isSpace c then "" else str c);
val txt_path = Path.ext "txt" o Path.explode o nospaces;
fun signal_success probfile toParent ppid msg =
let val _ = trace ("\nReporting Success for " ^ probfile ^ "\n" ^ msg)
in
(*We write the proof to a file because sending very long lines may fail...*)
File.write (txt_path probfile) msg;
TextIO.output (toParent, "Success.\n");
TextIO.output (toParent, probfile ^ "\n");
TextIO.flushOut toParent;
Posix.Process.kill(Posix.Process.K_PROC ppid, Posix.Signal.usr2)
end;
fun tstp_extract proofextract probfile toParent ppid ctxt th sgno thm_names =
let val cnfs = filter (String.isPrefix "cnf(") (map nospaces (lines proofextract))
in
signal_success probfile toParent ppid
(decode_tstp_file cnfs ctxt th sgno thm_names)
end;
(**** retrieve the axioms that were used in the proof ****)
(*Get names of axioms used. Axioms are indexed from 1, while the vector is indexed from 0*)
fun get_axiom_names (thm_names: string vector) step_nums =
let fun is_axiom n = n <= Vector.length thm_names
fun index i = Vector.sub(thm_names, i-1)
val axnums = List.filter is_axiom step_nums
val axnames = sort_distinct string_ord (map index axnums)
in
if length axnums = length step_nums then "UNSOUND!!" :: axnames
else axnames
end
(*String contains multiple lines. We want those of the form
"253[0:Inp] et cetera..."
A list consisting of the first number in each line is returned. *)
fun get_spass_linenums proofstr =
let val toks = String.tokens (not o Char.isAlphaNum)
fun inputno (ntok::"0"::"Inp"::_) = Int.fromString ntok
| inputno _ = NONE
val lines = String.tokens (fn c => c = #"\n") proofstr
in List.mapPartial (inputno o toks) lines end
fun get_axiom_names_spass proofstr thm_names =
get_axiom_names thm_names (get_spass_linenums proofstr);
fun not_comma c = c <> #",";
(*A valid TSTP axiom line has the form cnf(NNN,axiom,...) where NNN is a positive integer.*)
fun parse_tstp_line s =
let val ss = Substring.full (unprefix "cnf(" (nospaces s))
val (intf,rest) = Substring.splitl not_comma ss
val (rolef,rest) = Substring.splitl not_comma (Substring.triml 1 rest)
(*We only allow negated_conjecture because the line number will be removed in
get_axiom_names above, while suppressing the UNSOUND warning*)
val ints = if Substring.string rolef mem_string ["axiom","negated_conjecture"]
then Substring.string intf
else "error"
in Int.fromString ints end
handle Fail _ => NONE;
fun get_axiom_names_tstp proofstr thm_names =
get_axiom_names thm_names (List.mapPartial parse_tstp_line (split_lines proofstr));
(*String contains multiple lines. We want those of the form
"*********** [448, input] ***********".
A list consisting of the first number in each line is returned. *)
fun get_vamp_linenums proofstr =
let val toks = String.tokens (not o Char.isAlphaNum)
fun inputno [ntok,"input"] = Int.fromString ntok
| inputno _ = NONE
val lines = String.tokens (fn c => c = #"\n") proofstr
in List.mapPartial (inputno o toks) lines end
fun get_axiom_names_vamp proofstr thm_names =
get_axiom_names thm_names (get_vamp_linenums proofstr);
fun rules_to_metis [] = "metis"
| rules_to_metis xs = "(metis " ^ space_implode " " xs ^ ")"
(*The signal handler in watcher.ML must be able to read the output of this.*)
fun prover_lemma_list_aux getax proofstr probfile toParent ppid thm_names =
(trace ("\n\nGetting lemma names. proofstr is " ^ proofstr ^
" num of clauses is " ^ string_of_int (Vector.length thm_names));
signal_success probfile toParent ppid
("Try this command: \n apply " ^ rules_to_metis (getax proofstr thm_names))
)
handle e => (*FIXME: exn handler is too general!*)
(trace ("\nprover_lemma_list_aux: In exception handler: " ^ Toplevel.exn_message e);
TextIO.output (toParent, "Translation failed for the proof: " ^
String.toString proofstr ^ "\n");
TextIO.output (toParent, probfile);
TextIO.flushOut toParent;
Posix.Process.kill(Posix.Process.K_PROC ppid, Posix.Signal.usr2));
val e_lemma_list = prover_lemma_list_aux get_axiom_names_tstp;
val vamp_lemma_list = prover_lemma_list_aux get_axiom_names_vamp;
val spass_lemma_list = prover_lemma_list_aux get_axiom_names_spass;
(**** Extracting proofs from an ATP's output ****)
(*Return everything in s that comes before the string t*)
fun cut_before t s =
let val (s1,s2) = Substring.position t (Substring.full s)
in if Substring.size s2 = 0 then error "cut_before: string not found"
else Substring.string s2
end;
val start_E = "# Proof object starts here."
val end_E = "# Proof object ends here."
val start_V6 = "%================== Proof: ======================"
val end_V6 = "%============== End of proof. =================="
val start_V8 = "=========== Refutation =========="
val end_V8 = "======= End of refutation ======="
val end_SPASS = "Formulae used in the proof"
(*********************************************************************************)
(* Inspect the output of an ATP process to see if it has found a proof, *)
(* and if so, transfer output to the input pipe of the main Isabelle process *)
(*********************************************************************************)
(*Returns "true" if it successfully returns a lemma list, otherwise "false", but this
return value is currently never used!*)
fun startTransfer endS (fromChild, toParent, ppid, probfile, ctxt, th, sgno, thm_names) =
let fun transferInput currentString =
(case TextIO.inputLine fromChild of
NONE => (*end of file?*)
(trace ("\n extraction_failed. End bracket: " ^ endS ^
"\naccumulated text: " ^ currentString);
false)
| SOME thisLine =>
if String.isPrefix endS thisLine
then let val proofextract = currentString ^ cut_before endS thisLine
val lemma_list = if endS = end_V8 then vamp_lemma_list
else if endS = end_SPASS then spass_lemma_list
else e_lemma_list
in
trace ("\nExtracted proof:\n" ^ proofextract);
if !full andalso String.isPrefix "cnf(" proofextract
then tstp_extract proofextract probfile toParent ppid ctxt th sgno thm_names
else lemma_list proofextract probfile toParent ppid thm_names;
true
end
else transferInput (currentString^thisLine))
in
transferInput ""
end
(*The signal handler in watcher.ML must be able to read the output of this.*)
fun signal_parent (toParent, ppid, msg, probfile) =
(TextIO.output (toParent, msg);
TextIO.output (toParent, probfile ^ "\n");
TextIO.flushOut toParent;
trace ("\nSignalled parent: " ^ msg ^ probfile);
Posix.Process.kill(Posix.Process.K_PROC ppid, Posix.Signal.usr2);
(*Give the parent time to respond before possibly sending another signal*)
OS.Process.sleep (Time.fromMilliseconds 600));
(*FIXME: once TSTP output is produced by all ATPs, these three functions can be combined.*)
(*Called from watcher. Returns true if the Vampire process has returned a verdict.*)
fun checkVampProofFound (arg as (fromChild, toParent, ppid, probfile, ctxt, th, sgno, thm_names)) =
(case TextIO.inputLine fromChild of
NONE => (trace "\nNo proof output seen"; false)
| SOME thisLine =>
if String.isPrefix start_V8 thisLine
then startTransfer end_V8 arg
else if (String.isPrefix "Satisfiability detected" thisLine) orelse
(String.isPrefix "Refutation not found" thisLine)
then (signal_parent (toParent, ppid, "Failure\n", probfile);
true)
else checkVampProofFound arg);
(*Called from watcher. Returns true if the E process has returned a verdict.*)
fun checkEProofFound (arg as (fromChild, toParent, ppid, probfile, ctxt, th, sgno, thm_names)) =
(case TextIO.inputLine fromChild of
NONE => (trace "\nNo proof output seen"; false)
| SOME thisLine =>
if String.isPrefix start_E thisLine
then startTransfer end_E arg
else if String.isPrefix "# Problem is satisfiable" thisLine
then (signal_parent (toParent, ppid, "Invalid\n", probfile);
true)
else if String.isPrefix "# Cannot determine problem status within resource limit" thisLine
then (signal_parent (toParent, ppid, "Failure\n", probfile);
true)
else checkEProofFound arg);
(*Called from watcher. Returns true if the SPASS process has returned a verdict.*)
fun checkSpassProofFound (arg as (fromChild, toParent, ppid, probfile, ctxt, th, sgno, thm_names)) =
(case TextIO.inputLine fromChild of
NONE => (trace "\nNo proof output seen"; false)
| SOME thisLine =>
if String.isPrefix "Here is a proof" thisLine
then startTransfer end_SPASS arg
else if thisLine = "SPASS beiseite: Completion found.\n"
then (signal_parent (toParent, ppid, "Invalid\n", probfile);
true)
else if thisLine = "SPASS beiseite: Ran out of time.\n" orelse
thisLine = "SPASS beiseite: Maximal number of loops exceeded.\n"
then (signal_parent (toParent, ppid, "Failure\n", probfile);
true)
else checkSpassProofFound arg);
end;