doc-src/TutorialI/Misc/prime_def.thy
author wenzelm
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:44:11 +0200
changeset 16860 43abdba4da5c
parent 16417 9bc16273c2d4
permissions -rw-r--r--
* Pure/library.ML: several combinators for linear functional transformations; * Pure/library.ML: canonical list combinators fold, fold_rev, and fold_yield; * Pure/term.ML: combinators fold_atyps, fold_aterms, fold_term_types, fold_types;

(*<*)
theory prime_def imports Main begin;
consts prime :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
(*>*)
text{*
\begin{warn}
A common mistake when writing definitions is to introduce extra free
variables on the right-hand side.  Consider the following, flawed definition
(where @{text"dvd"} means ``divides''):
@{term[display,quotes]"prime(p) == 1 < p & (m dvd p --> (m=1 | m=p))"}
\par\noindent\hangindent=0pt
Isabelle rejects this ``definition'' because of the extra @{term"m"} on the
right-hand side, which would introduce an inconsistency (why?). 
The correct version is
@{term[display,quotes]"prime(p) == 1 < p & (!m. m dvd p --> (m=1 | m=p))"}
\end{warn}
*}
(*<*)
end
(*>*)