(* Title: HOL/Presburger.thy
Author: Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
*)
header {* Decision Procedure for Presburger Arithmetic *}
theory Presburger
imports Groebner_Basis SetInterval
uses
"Tools/Qelim/cooper_data.ML"
"Tools/Qelim/generated_cooper.ML"
("Tools/Qelim/cooper.ML")
("Tools/Qelim/presburger.ML")
begin
setup CooperData.setup
subsection{* The @{text "-\<infinity>"} and @{text "+\<infinity>"} Properties *}
lemma minf:
"\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x<z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. (P x \<and> Q x) = (P' x \<and> Q' x)"
"\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x<z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. (P x \<or> Q x) = (P' x \<or> Q' x)"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x = t) = False"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x \<noteq> t) = True"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x < t) = True"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x \<le> t) = True"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x > t) = False"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x \<ge> t) = False"
"\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'a::{linorder,plus,Ring_and_Field.dvd})<z. (d dvd x + s) = (d dvd x + s)"
"\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'a::{linorder,plus,Ring_and_Field.dvd})<z. (\<not> d dvd x + s) = (\<not> d dvd x + s)"
"\<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. F = F"
by ((erule exE, erule exE,rule_tac x="min z za" in exI,simp)+, (rule_tac x="t" in exI,fastsimp)+) simp_all
lemma pinf:
"\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x>z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. (P x \<and> Q x) = (P' x \<and> Q' x)"
"\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x>z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. (P x \<or> Q x) = (P' x \<or> Q' x)"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x = t) = False"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x \<noteq> t) = True"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x < t) = False"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x \<le> t) = False"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x > t) = True"
"\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x \<ge> t) = True"
"\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'a::{linorder,plus,Ring_and_Field.dvd})>z. (d dvd x + s) = (d dvd x + s)"
"\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'a::{linorder,plus,Ring_and_Field.dvd})>z. (\<not> d dvd x + s) = (\<not> d dvd x + s)"
"\<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. F = F"
by ((erule exE, erule exE,rule_tac x="max z za" in exI,simp)+,(rule_tac x="t" in exI,fastsimp)+) simp_all
lemma inf_period:
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x k. P x = P (x - k*D); \<forall>x k. Q x = Q (x - k*D)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (P x \<and> Q x) = (P (x - k*D) \<and> Q (x - k*D))"
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x k. P x = P (x - k*D); \<forall>x k. Q x = Q (x - k*D)\<rbrakk>
\<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (P x \<or> Q x) = (P (x - k*D) \<or> Q (x - k*D))"
"(d::'a::{comm_ring,Ring_and_Field.dvd}) dvd D \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (d dvd x + t) = (d dvd (x - k*D) + t)"
"(d::'a::{comm_ring,Ring_and_Field.dvd}) dvd D \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (\<not>d dvd x + t) = (\<not>d dvd (x - k*D) + t)"
"\<forall>x k. F = F"
apply (auto elim!: dvdE simp add: algebra_simps)
unfolding mult_assoc [symmetric] left_distrib [symmetric] left_diff_distrib [symmetric]
unfolding dvd_def mult_commute [of d]
by auto
subsection{* The A and B sets *}
lemma bset:
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j \<in> {1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - D) ;
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x - D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j) \<longrightarrow> (P x \<and> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x - D) \<and> Q (x - D))"
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - D) ;
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x - D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (P x \<or> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x - D) \<or> Q (x - D))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0; t - 1\<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D = t))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t \<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<noteq> t))"
"D>0 \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D < t))"
"D>0 \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<le> t))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t \<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D > t))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t - 1 \<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<ge> t))"
"d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x - D) + t))"
"d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not> d dvd (x - D) + t))"
"\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j) \<longrightarrow> F \<longrightarrow> F"
proof (blast, blast)
assume dp: "D > 0" and tB: "t - 1\<in> B"
show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D = t))"
apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="1"],erule ballE[where x="t - 1"])
apply algebra using dp tB by simp_all
next
assume dp: "D > 0" and tB: "t \<in> B"
show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<noteq> t))"
apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="D"],erule ballE[where x="t"])
apply algebra
using dp tB by simp_all
next
assume dp: "D > 0" thus "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D < t))" by arith
next
assume dp: "D > 0" thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<le> t)" by arith
next
assume dp: "D > 0" and tB:"t \<in> B"
{fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j" and g: "x > t" and ng: "\<not> (x - D) > t"
hence "x -t \<le> D" and "1 \<le> x - t" by simp+
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x - t = j" by auto
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = t + j" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
with nob tB have "False" by simp}
thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D > t)" by blast
next
assume dp: "D > 0" and tB:"t - 1\<in> B"
{fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j" and g: "x \<ge> t" and ng: "\<not> (x - D) \<ge> t"
hence "x - (t - 1) \<le> D" and "1 \<le> x - (t - 1)" by simp+
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x - (t - 1) = j" by auto
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = (t - 1) + j" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
with nob tB have "False" by simp}
thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<ge> t)" by blast
next
assume d: "d dvd D"
{fix x assume H: "d dvd x + t" with d have "d dvd (x - D) + t" by algebra}
thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x - D) + t)" by simp
next
assume d: "d dvd D"
{fix x assume H: "\<not>(d dvd x + t)" with d have "\<not> d dvd (x - D) + t"
by (clarsimp simp add: dvd_def,erule_tac x= "ka + k" in allE,simp add: algebra_simps)}
thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd (x - D) + t)" by auto
qed blast
lemma aset:
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + D) ;
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x + D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j) \<longrightarrow> (P x \<and> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x + D) \<and> Q (x + D))"
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + D) ;
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x + D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (P x \<or> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x + D) \<or> Q (x + D))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0; t + 1\<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D = t))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t \<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<noteq> t))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0; t\<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int). (\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D < t))"
"\<lbrakk>D>0; t + 1 \<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<le> t))"
"D>0 \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D > t))"
"D>0 \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<ge> t))"
"d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x + D) + t))"
"d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not> d dvd (x + D) + t))"
"\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j) \<longrightarrow> F \<longrightarrow> F"
proof (blast, blast)
assume dp: "D > 0" and tA: "t + 1 \<in> A"
show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D = t))"
apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="1"],erule ballE[where x="t + 1"])
using dp tA by simp_all
next
assume dp: "D > 0" and tA: "t \<in> A"
show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<noteq> t))"
apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="D"],erule ballE[where x="t"])
using dp tA by simp_all
next
assume dp: "D > 0" thus "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D > t))" by arith
next
assume dp: "D > 0" thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<ge> t)" by arith
next
assume dp: "D > 0" and tA:"t \<in> A"
{fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j" and g: "x < t" and ng: "\<not> (x + D) < t"
hence "t - x \<le> D" and "1 \<le> t - x" by simp+
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. t - x = j" by auto
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = t - j" by (auto simp add: algebra_simps)
with nob tA have "False" by simp}
thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D < t)" by blast
next
assume dp: "D > 0" and tA:"t + 1\<in> A"
{fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j" and g: "x \<le> t" and ng: "\<not> (x + D) \<le> t"
hence "(t + 1) - x \<le> D" and "1 \<le> (t + 1) - x" by (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. (t + 1) - x = j" by auto
hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = (t + 1) - j" by (auto simp add: algebra_simps)
with nob tA have "False" by simp}
thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<le> t)" by blast
next
assume d: "d dvd D"
{fix x assume H: "d dvd x + t" with d have "d dvd (x + D) + t"
by (clarsimp simp add: dvd_def,rule_tac x= "ka + k" in exI,simp add: algebra_simps)}
thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x + D) + t)" by simp
next
assume d: "d dvd D"
{fix x assume H: "\<not>(d dvd x + t)" with d have "\<not>d dvd (x + D) + t"
by (clarsimp simp add: dvd_def,erule_tac x= "ka - k" in allE,simp add: algebra_simps)}
thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd (x + D) + t)" by auto
qed blast
subsection{* Cooper's Theorem @{text "-\<infinity>"} and @{text "+\<infinity>"} Version *}
subsubsection{* First some trivial facts about periodic sets or predicates *}
lemma periodic_finite_ex:
assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and modd: "ALL x k. P x = P(x - k*d)"
shows "(EX x. P x) = (EX j : {1..d}. P j)"
(is "?LHS = ?RHS")
proof
assume ?LHS
then obtain x where P: "P x" ..
have "x mod d = x - (x div d)*d" by(simp add:zmod_zdiv_equality mult_ac eq_diff_eq)
hence Pmod: "P x = P(x mod d)" using modd by simp
show ?RHS
proof (cases)
assume "x mod d = 0"
hence "P 0" using P Pmod by simp
moreover have "P 0 = P(0 - (-1)*d)" using modd by blast
ultimately have "P d" by simp
moreover have "d : {1..d}" using dpos by(simp add:atLeastAtMost_iff)
ultimately show ?RHS ..
next
assume not0: "x mod d \<noteq> 0"
have "P(x mod d)" using dpos P Pmod by(simp add:pos_mod_sign pos_mod_bound)
moreover have "x mod d : {1..d}"
proof -
from dpos have "0 \<le> x mod d" by(rule pos_mod_sign)
moreover from dpos have "x mod d < d" by(rule pos_mod_bound)
ultimately show ?thesis using not0 by(simp add:atLeastAtMost_iff)
qed
ultimately show ?RHS ..
qed
qed auto
subsubsection{* The @{text "-\<infinity>"} Version*}
lemma decr_lemma: "0 < (d::int) \<Longrightarrow> x - (abs(x-z)+1) * d < z"
by(induct rule: int_gr_induct,simp_all add:int_distrib)
lemma incr_lemma: "0 < (d::int) \<Longrightarrow> z < x + (abs(x-z)+1) * d"
by(induct rule: int_gr_induct, simp_all add:int_distrib)
theorem int_induct[case_names base step1 step2]:
assumes
base: "P(k::int)" and step1: "\<And>i. \<lbrakk>k \<le> i; P i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(i+1)" and
step2: "\<And>i. \<lbrakk>k \<ge> i; P i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P(i - 1)"
shows "P i"
proof -
have "i \<le> k \<or> i\<ge> k" by arith
thus ?thesis using prems int_ge_induct[where P="P" and k="k" and i="i"] int_le_induct[where P="P" and k="k" and i="i"] by blast
qed
lemma decr_mult_lemma:
assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and minus: "\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - d)" and knneg: "0 <= k"
shows "ALL x. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - k*d)"
using knneg
proof (induct rule:int_ge_induct)
case base thus ?case by simp
next
case (step i)
{fix x
have "P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - i * d)" using step.hyps by blast
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> P(x - (i + 1) * d)" using minus[THEN spec, of "x - i * d"]
by (simp add:int_distrib OrderedGroup.diff_diff_eq[symmetric])
ultimately have "P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - (i + 1) * d)" by blast}
thus ?case ..
qed
lemma minusinfinity:
assumes dpos: "0 < d" and
P1eqP1: "ALL x k. P1 x = P1(x - k*d)" and ePeqP1: "EX z::int. ALL x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x = P1 x)"
shows "(EX x. P1 x) \<longrightarrow> (EX x. P x)"
proof
assume eP1: "EX x. P1 x"
then obtain x where P1: "P1 x" ..
from ePeqP1 obtain z where P1eqP: "ALL x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x = P1 x)" ..
let ?w = "x - (abs(x-z)+1) * d"
from dpos have w: "?w < z" by(rule decr_lemma)
have "P1 x = P1 ?w" using P1eqP1 by blast
also have "\<dots> = P(?w)" using w P1eqP by blast
finally have "P ?w" using P1 by blast
thus "EX x. P x" ..
qed
lemma cpmi:
assumes dp: "0 < D" and p1:"\<exists>z. \<forall> x< z. P x = P' x"
and nb:"\<forall>x.(\<forall> j\<in> {1..D}. \<forall>(b::int) \<in> B. x \<noteq> b+j) --> P (x) --> P (x - D)"
and pd: "\<forall> x k. P' x = P' (x-k*D)"
shows "(\<exists>x. P x) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1..D} . P' j) | (\<exists> j \<in> {1..D}.\<exists> b\<in> B. P (b+j)))"
(is "?L = (?R1 \<or> ?R2)")
proof-
{assume "?R2" hence "?L" by blast}
moreover
{assume H:"?R1" hence "?L" using minusinfinity[OF dp pd p1] periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd] by simp}
moreover
{ fix x
assume P: "P x" and H: "\<not> ?R2"
{fix y assume "\<not> (\<exists>j\<in>{1..D}. \<exists>b\<in>B. P (b + j))" and P: "P y"
hence "~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. y = b+j)" by auto
with nb P have "P (y - D)" by auto }
hence "ALL x.~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. P(b+j)) --> P (x) --> P (x - D)" by blast
with H P have th: " \<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - D)" by auto
from p1 obtain z where z: "ALL x. x < z --> (P x = P' x)" by blast
let ?y = "x - (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)*D"
have zp: "0 <= (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)" by arith
from dp have yz: "?y < z" using decr_lemma[OF dp] by simp
from z[rule_format, OF yz] decr_mult_lemma[OF dp th zp, rule_format, OF P] have th2: " P' ?y" by auto
with periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd]
have "?R1" by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
subsubsection {* The @{text "+\<infinity>"} Version*}
lemma plusinfinity:
assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and
P1eqP1: "\<forall>x k. P' x = P'(x - k*d)" and ePeqP1: "\<exists> z. \<forall> x>z. P x = P' x"
shows "(\<exists> x. P' x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> x. P x)"
proof
assume eP1: "EX x. P' x"
then obtain x where P1: "P' x" ..
from ePeqP1 obtain z where P1eqP: "\<forall>x>z. P x = P' x" ..
let ?w' = "x + (abs(x-z)+1) * d"
let ?w = "x - (-(abs(x-z) + 1))*d"
have ww'[simp]: "?w = ?w'" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
from dpos have w: "?w > z" by(simp only: ww' incr_lemma)
hence "P' x = P' ?w" using P1eqP1 by blast
also have "\<dots> = P(?w)" using w P1eqP by blast
finally have "P ?w" using P1 by blast
thus "EX x. P x" ..
qed
lemma incr_mult_lemma:
assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and plus: "ALL x::int. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + d)" and knneg: "0 <= k"
shows "ALL x. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + k*d)"
using knneg
proof (induct rule:int_ge_induct)
case base thus ?case by simp
next
case (step i)
{fix x
have "P x \<longrightarrow> P (x + i * d)" using step.hyps by blast
also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> P(x + (i + 1) * d)" using plus[THEN spec, of "x + i * d"]
by (simp add:int_distrib zadd_ac)
ultimately have "P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + (i + 1) * d)" by blast}
thus ?case ..
qed
lemma cppi:
assumes dp: "0 < D" and p1:"\<exists>z. \<forall> x> z. P x = P' x"
and nb:"\<forall>x.(\<forall> j\<in> {1..D}. \<forall>(b::int) \<in> A. x \<noteq> b - j) --> P (x) --> P (x + D)"
and pd: "\<forall> x k. P' x= P' (x-k*D)"
shows "(\<exists>x. P x) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1..D} . P' j) | (\<exists> j \<in> {1..D}.\<exists> b\<in> A. P (b - j)))" (is "?L = (?R1 \<or> ?R2)")
proof-
{assume "?R2" hence "?L" by blast}
moreover
{assume H:"?R1" hence "?L" using plusinfinity[OF dp pd p1] periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd] by simp}
moreover
{ fix x
assume P: "P x" and H: "\<not> ?R2"
{fix y assume "\<not> (\<exists>j\<in>{1..D}. \<exists>b\<in>A. P (b - j))" and P: "P y"
hence "~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : A. y = b - j)" by auto
with nb P have "P (y + D)" by auto }
hence "ALL x.~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : A. P(b-j)) --> P (x) --> P (x + D)" by blast
with H P have th: " \<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x + D)" by auto
from p1 obtain z where z: "ALL x. x > z --> (P x = P' x)" by blast
let ?y = "x + (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)*D"
have zp: "0 <= (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)" by arith
from dp have yz: "?y > z" using incr_lemma[OF dp] by simp
from z[rule_format, OF yz] incr_mult_lemma[OF dp th zp, rule_format, OF P] have th2: " P' ?y" by auto
with periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd]
have "?R1" by blast}
ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
lemma simp_from_to: "{i..j::int} = (if j < i then {} else insert i {i+1..j})"
apply(simp add:atLeastAtMost_def atLeast_def atMost_def)
apply(fastsimp)
done
theorem unity_coeff_ex: "(\<exists>(x::'a::{semiring_0,Ring_and_Field.dvd}). P (l * x)) \<equiv> (\<exists>x. l dvd (x + 0) \<and> P x)"
apply (rule eq_reflection [symmetric])
apply (rule iffI)
defer
apply (erule exE)
apply (rule_tac x = "l * x" in exI)
apply (simp add: dvd_def)
apply (rule_tac x = x in exI, simp)
apply (erule exE)
apply (erule conjE)
apply simp
apply (erule dvdE)
apply (rule_tac x = k in exI)
apply simp
done
lemma zdvd_mono: assumes not0: "(k::int) \<noteq> 0"
shows "((m::int) dvd t) \<equiv> (k*m dvd k*t)"
using not0 by (simp add: dvd_def)
lemma uminus_dvd_conv: "(d dvd (t::int)) \<equiv> (-d dvd t)" "(d dvd (t::int)) \<equiv> (d dvd -t)"
by simp_all
text {* \bigskip Theorems for transforming predicates on nat to predicates on @{text int}*}
lemma all_nat: "(\<forall>x::nat. P x) = (\<forall>x::int. 0 <= x \<longrightarrow> P (nat x))"
by (simp split add: split_nat)
lemma ex_nat: "(\<exists>x::nat. P x) = (\<exists>x::int. 0 <= x \<and> P (nat x))"
apply (auto split add: split_nat)
apply (rule_tac x="int x" in exI, simp)
apply (rule_tac x = "nat x" in exI,erule_tac x = "nat x" in allE, simp)
done
lemma zdiff_int_split: "P (int (x - y)) =
((y \<le> x \<longrightarrow> P (int x - int y)) \<and> (x < y \<longrightarrow> P 0))"
by (case_tac "y \<le> x", simp_all add: zdiff_int)
lemma number_of1: "(0::int) <= number_of n \<Longrightarrow> (0::int) <= number_of (Int.Bit0 n) \<and> (0::int) <= number_of (Int.Bit1 n)"
by simp
lemma number_of2: "(0::int) <= Numeral0" by simp
lemma Suc_plus1: "Suc n = n + 1" by simp
text {*
\medskip Specific instances of congruence rules, to prevent
simplifier from looping. *}
theorem imp_le_cong: "(0 <= x \<Longrightarrow> P = P') \<Longrightarrow> (0 <= (x::int) \<longrightarrow> P) = (0 <= x \<longrightarrow> P')" by simp
theorem conj_le_cong: "(0 <= x \<Longrightarrow> P = P') \<Longrightarrow> (0 <= (x::int) \<and> P) = (0 <= x \<and> P')"
by (simp cong: conj_cong)
lemma int_eq_number_of_eq:
"(((number_of v)::int) = (number_of w)) = iszero ((number_of (v + (uminus w)))::int)"
by (rule eq_number_of_eq)
declare dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[symmetric, presburger]
declare mod_1[presburger]
declare mod_0[presburger]
declare mod_by_1[presburger]
declare zmod_zero[presburger]
declare zmod_self[presburger]
declare mod_self[presburger]
declare mod_by_0[presburger]
declare mod_div_trivial[presburger]
declare div_mod_equality2[presburger]
declare div_mod_equality[presburger]
declare mod_div_equality2[presburger]
declare mod_div_equality[presburger]
declare mod_mult_self1[presburger]
declare mod_mult_self2[presburger]
declare zdiv_zmod_equality2[presburger]
declare zdiv_zmod_equality[presburger]
declare mod2_Suc_Suc[presburger]
lemma [presburger]: "(a::int) div 0 = 0" and [presburger]: "a mod 0 = a"
by simp_all
use "Tools/Qelim/cooper.ML"
oracle linzqe_oracle = Coopereif.cooper_oracle
use "Tools/Qelim/presburger.ML"
declaration {* fn _ =>
arith_tactic_add
(mk_arith_tactic "presburger" (fn ctxt => fn i => fn st =>
(warning "Trying Presburger arithmetic ...";
Presburger.cooper_tac true [] [] ctxt i st)))
*}
method_setup presburger = {*
let
fun keyword k = Scan.lift (Args.$$$ k -- Args.colon) >> K ()
fun simple_keyword k = Scan.lift (Args.$$$ k) >> K ()
val addN = "add"
val delN = "del"
val elimN = "elim"
val any_keyword = keyword addN || keyword delN || simple_keyword elimN
val thms = Scan.repeat (Scan.unless any_keyword Attrib.multi_thm) >> flat;
in
fn src => Method.syntax
((Scan.optional (simple_keyword elimN >> K false) true) --
(Scan.optional (keyword addN |-- thms) []) --
(Scan.optional (keyword delN |-- thms) [])) src
#> (fn (((elim, add_ths), del_ths),ctxt) =>
Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' (Presburger.cooper_tac elim add_ths del_ths ctxt))
end
*} "Cooper's algorithm for Presburger arithmetic"
lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod 2 = (1::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod 2 = Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod (Suc (Suc 0)) = (1::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod (Suc (Suc 0)) = Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod 2 = (1::int) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
lemma zdvd_period:
fixes a d :: int
assumes advdd: "a dvd d"
shows "a dvd (x + t) \<longleftrightarrow> a dvd ((x + c * d) + t)"
using advdd
apply -
apply (rule iffI)
by algebra+
end