(* Title: HOL/Tools/SMT2/z3_new_isar.ML
Author: Jasmin Blanchette, TU Muenchen
Z3 proofs as generic ATP proofs for Isar proof reconstruction.
*)
signature Z3_NEW_ISAR =
sig
val atp_proof_of_z3_proof: Proof.context -> thm list -> term list -> term ->
(string * term) list -> int list -> int -> (int * string) list -> Z3_New_Proof.z3_step list ->
(term, string) ATP_Proof.atp_step list
end;
structure Z3_New_Isar: Z3_NEW_ISAR =
struct
open ATP_Util
open ATP_Problem
open ATP_Proof
open ATP_Proof_Reconstruct
val z3_apply_def_rule = Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule Z3_New_Proof.Apply_Def
val z3_hypothesis_rule = Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule Z3_New_Proof.Hypothesis
val z3_intro_def_rule = Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule Z3_New_Proof.Intro_Def
val z3_lemma_rule = Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule Z3_New_Proof.Lemma
fun inline_z3_defs _ [] = []
| inline_z3_defs defs ((name, role, t, rule, deps) :: lines) =
if rule = z3_intro_def_rule then
let val def = t |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> swap in
inline_z3_defs (insert (op =) def defs)
(map (replace_dependencies_in_line (name, [])) lines)
end
else if rule = z3_apply_def_rule then
inline_z3_defs defs (map (replace_dependencies_in_line (name, [])) lines)
else
(name, role, Term.subst_atomic defs t, rule, deps) :: inline_z3_defs defs lines
fun add_z3_hypotheses [] = I
| add_z3_hypotheses hyps =
HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
#> curry s_imp (Library.foldr1 s_conj (map HOLogic.dest_Trueprop hyps))
#> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
fun inline_z3_hypotheses _ _ [] = []
| inline_z3_hypotheses hyp_names hyps ((name, role, t, rule, deps) :: lines) =
if rule = z3_hypothesis_rule then
inline_z3_hypotheses (name :: hyp_names) (AList.map_default (op =) (t, []) (cons name) hyps)
lines
else
let val deps' = subtract (op =) hyp_names deps in
if rule = z3_lemma_rule then
(name, role, t, rule, deps') :: inline_z3_hypotheses hyp_names hyps lines
else
let
val add_hyps = filter_out (null o inter (op =) deps o snd) hyps
val t' = add_z3_hypotheses (map fst add_hyps) t
val deps' = subtract (op =) hyp_names deps
val hyps' = fold (AList.update (op =) o apsnd (insert (op =) name)) add_hyps hyps
in
(name, role, t', rule, deps') :: inline_z3_hypotheses hyp_names hyps' lines
end
end
fun simplify_bool ((all as Const (@{const_name All}, _)) $ Abs (s, T, t)) =
let val t' = simplify_bool t in
if loose_bvar1 (t', 0) then all $ Abs (s, T, t') else t'
end
| simplify_bool (@{const Not} $ t) = s_not (simplify_bool t)
| simplify_bool (@{const conj} $ t $ u) = s_conj (simplify_bool t, simplify_bool u)
| simplify_bool (@{const disj} $ t $ u) = s_disj (simplify_bool t, simplify_bool u)
| simplify_bool (@{const implies} $ t $ u) = s_imp (simplify_bool t, simplify_bool u)
| simplify_bool (@{const HOL.eq (bool)} $ t $ u) = s_iff (simplify_bool t, simplify_bool u)
| simplify_bool (t as Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ u $ v) =
if u aconv v then @{const True} else t
| simplify_bool (t $ u) = simplify_bool t $ simplify_bool u
| simplify_bool (Abs (s, T, t)) = Abs (s, T, simplify_bool t)
| simplify_bool t = t
(* It is not entirely clear why this should be necessary, especially for abstractions variables. *)
val unskolemize_names =
Term.map_abs_vars (perhaps (try Name.dest_skolem))
#> Term.map_aterms (perhaps (try (fn Free (s, T) => Free (Name.dest_skolem s, T))))
fun atp_proof_of_z3_proof ctxt rewrite_rules hyp_ts concl_t fact_helper_ts prem_ids conjecture_id
fact_helper_ids proof =
let
val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
fun steps_of (Z3_New_Proof.Z3_Step {id, rule, prems, concl, ...}) =
let
val sid = string_of_int id
val concl' =
concl
|> Raw_Simplifier.rewrite_term thy rewrite_rules []
|> Object_Logic.atomize_term thy
|> simplify_bool
|> unskolemize_names
|> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
fun standard_step role =
((sid, []), role, concl', Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule rule,
map (fn id => (string_of_int id, [])) prems)
in
(case rule of
Z3_New_Proof.Asserted =>
let
val ss = the_list (AList.lookup (op =) fact_helper_ids id)
val name0 = (sid ^ "a", ss)
val (role0, concl0) =
(case ss of
[s] => (Axiom, the (AList.lookup (op =) fact_helper_ts s))
| _ =>
if id = conjecture_id then
(Conjecture, concl_t)
else
(Hypothesis,
(case find_index (curry (op =) id) prem_ids of
~1 => concl
| i => nth hyp_ts i)))
val normalize_prems =
SMT2_Normalize.case_bool_entry :: SMT2_Normalize.special_quant_table @
SMT2_Normalize.abs_min_max_table
|> map_filter (fn (c, th) =>
if exists_Const (curry (op =) c o fst) concl0 then
let val s = short_thm_name ctxt th in SOME (s, [s]) end
else
NONE)
in
(if role0 = Axiom then []
else [(name0, role0, concl0, Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule rule, [])]) @
[((sid, []), Plain, concl', Z3_New_Proof.string_of_rule Z3_New_Proof.Rewrite,
name0 :: normalize_prems)]
end
| Z3_New_Proof.Rewrite => [standard_step Lemma]
| Z3_New_Proof.Rewrite_Star => [standard_step Lemma]
| Z3_New_Proof.Skolemize => [standard_step Lemma]
| Z3_New_Proof.Th_Lemma _ => [standard_step Lemma]
| _ => [standard_step Plain])
end
in
proof
|> maps steps_of
|> inline_z3_defs []
|> inline_z3_hypotheses [] []
end
end;