| author | wenzelm |
| Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:54:50 +0100 | |
| changeset 46716 | c45a4427db39 |
| parent 46577 | e5438c5797ae |
| child 46912 | e0cd5c4df8e6 |
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
(* Title: HOL/UNITY/Extend.thy Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Copyright 1998 University of Cambridge Extending of state setsExtending of state sets function f (forget) maps the extended state to the original state function g (forgotten) maps the extended state to the "extending part" *) header{*Extending State Sets*} theory Extend imports Guar begin definition (*MOVE to Relation.thy?*) Restrict :: "[ 'a set, ('a*'b) set] => ('a*'b) set" where "Restrict A r = r \<inter> (A <*> UNIV)" definition good_map :: "['a*'b => 'c] => bool" where "good_map h <-> surj h & (\<forall>x y. fst (inv h (h (x,y))) = x)" (*Using the locale constant "f", this is f (h (x,y))) = x*) definition extend_set :: "['a*'b => 'c, 'a set] => 'c set" where "extend_set h A = h ` (A <*> UNIV)" definition project_set :: "['a*'b => 'c, 'c set] => 'a set" where "project_set h C = {x. \<exists>y. h(x,y) \<in> C}" definition extend_act :: "['a*'b => 'c, ('a*'a) set] => ('c*'c) set" where "extend_act h = (%act. \<Union>(s,s') \<in> act. \<Union>y. {(h(s,y), h(s',y))})" definition project_act :: "['a*'b => 'c, ('c*'c) set] => ('a*'a) set" where "project_act h act = {(x,x'). \<exists>y y'. (h(x,y), h(x',y')) \<in> act}" definition extend :: "['a*'b => 'c, 'a program] => 'c program" where "extend h F = mk_program (extend_set h (Init F), extend_act h ` Acts F, project_act h -` AllowedActs F)" definition (*Argument C allows weak safety laws to be projected*) project :: "['a*'b => 'c, 'c set, 'c program] => 'a program" where "project h C F = mk_program (project_set h (Init F), project_act h ` Restrict C ` Acts F, {act. Restrict (project_set h C) act : project_act h ` Restrict C ` AllowedActs F})" locale Extend = fixes f :: "'c => 'a" and g :: "'c => 'b" and h :: "'a*'b => 'c" (*isomorphism between 'a * 'b and 'c *) and slice :: "['c set, 'b] => 'a set" assumes good_h: "good_map h" defines f_def: "f z == fst (inv h z)" and g_def: "g z == snd (inv h z)" and slice_def: "slice Z y == {x. h(x,y) \<in> Z}" (** These we prove OUTSIDE the locale. **) subsection{*Restrict*} (*MOVE to Relation.thy?*) lemma Restrict_iff [iff]: "((x,y): Restrict A r) = ((x,y): r & x \<in> A)" by (unfold Restrict_def, blast) lemma Restrict_UNIV [simp]: "Restrict UNIV = id" apply (rule ext) apply (auto simp add: Restrict_def) done lemma Restrict_empty [simp]: "Restrict {} r = {}" by (auto simp add: Restrict_def) lemma Restrict_Int [simp]: "Restrict A (Restrict B r) = Restrict (A \<inter> B) r" by (unfold Restrict_def, blast) lemma Restrict_triv: "Domain r \<subseteq> A ==> Restrict A r = r" by (unfold Restrict_def, auto) lemma Restrict_subset: "Restrict A r \<subseteq> r" by (unfold Restrict_def, auto) lemma Restrict_eq_mono: "[| A \<subseteq> B; Restrict B r = Restrict B s |] ==> Restrict A r = Restrict A s" by (unfold Restrict_def, blast) lemma Restrict_imageI: "[| s \<in> RR; Restrict A r = Restrict A s |] ==> Restrict A r \<in> Restrict A ` RR" by (unfold Restrict_def image_def, auto) lemma Domain_Restrict [simp]: "Domain (Restrict A r) = A \<inter> Domain r" by blast lemma Image_Restrict [simp]: "(Restrict A r) `` B = r `` (A \<inter> B)" by blast (*Possibly easier than reasoning about "inv h"*) lemma good_mapI: assumes surj_h: "surj h" and prem: "!! x x' y y'. h(x,y) = h(x',y') ==> x=x'" shows "good_map h" apply (simp add: good_map_def) apply (safe intro!: surj_h) apply (rule prem) apply (subst surjective_pairing [symmetric]) apply (subst surj_h [THEN surj_f_inv_f]) apply (rule refl) done lemma good_map_is_surj: "good_map h ==> surj h" by (unfold good_map_def, auto) (*A convenient way of finding a closed form for inv h*) lemma fst_inv_equalityI: assumes surj_h: "surj h" and prem: "!! x y. g (h(x,y)) = x" shows "fst (inv h z) = g z" by (metis UNIV_I f_inv_into_f pair_collapse prem surj_h) subsection{*Trivial properties of f, g, h*} lemma (in Extend) f_h_eq [simp]: "f(h(x,y)) = x" by (simp add: f_def good_h [unfolded good_map_def, THEN conjunct2]) lemma (in Extend) h_inject1 [dest]: "h(x,y) = h(x',y') ==> x=x'" apply (drule_tac f = f in arg_cong) apply (simp add: f_def good_h [unfolded good_map_def, THEN conjunct2]) done lemma (in Extend) h_f_g_equiv: "h(f z, g z) == z" by (simp add: f_def g_def good_h [unfolded good_map_def, THEN conjunct1, THEN surj_f_inv_f]) lemma (in Extend) h_f_g_eq: "h(f z, g z) = z" by (simp add: h_f_g_equiv) lemma (in Extend) split_extended_all: "(!!z. PROP P z) == (!!u y. PROP P (h (u, y)))" proof assume allP: "\<And>z. PROP P z" fix u y show "PROP P (h (u, y))" by (rule allP) next assume allPh: "\<And>u y. PROP P (h(u,y))" fix z have Phfgz: "PROP P (h (f z, g z))" by (rule allPh) show "PROP P z" by (rule Phfgz [unfolded h_f_g_equiv]) qed subsection{*@{term extend_set}: basic properties*} lemma project_set_iff [iff]: "(x \<in> project_set h C) = (\<exists>y. h(x,y) \<in> C)" by (simp add: project_set_def) lemma extend_set_mono: "A \<subseteq> B ==> extend_set h A \<subseteq> extend_set h B" by (unfold extend_set_def, blast) lemma (in Extend) mem_extend_set_iff [iff]: "z \<in> extend_set h A = (f z \<in> A)" apply (unfold extend_set_def) apply (force intro: h_f_g_eq [symmetric]) done lemma (in Extend) extend_set_strict_mono [iff]: "(extend_set h A \<subseteq> extend_set h B) = (A \<subseteq> B)" by (unfold extend_set_def, force) lemma extend_set_empty [simp]: "extend_set h {} = {}" by (unfold extend_set_def, auto) lemma (in Extend) extend_set_eq_Collect: "extend_set h {s. P s} = {s. P(f s)}" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_sing: "extend_set h {x} = {s. f s = x}" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_inverse [simp]: "project_set h (extend_set h C) = C" by (unfold extend_set_def, auto) lemma (in Extend) extend_set_project_set: "C \<subseteq> extend_set h (project_set h C)" apply (unfold extend_set_def) apply (auto simp add: split_extended_all, blast) done lemma (in Extend) inj_extend_set: "inj (extend_set h)" apply (rule inj_on_inverseI) apply (rule extend_set_inverse) done lemma (in Extend) extend_set_UNIV_eq [simp]: "extend_set h UNIV = UNIV" apply (unfold extend_set_def) apply (auto simp add: split_extended_all) done subsection{*@{term project_set}: basic properties*} (*project_set is simply image!*) lemma (in Extend) project_set_eq: "project_set h C = f ` C" by (auto intro: f_h_eq [symmetric] simp add: split_extended_all) (*Converse appears to fail*) lemma (in Extend) project_set_I: "!!z. z \<in> C ==> f z \<in> project_set h C" by (auto simp add: split_extended_all) subsection{*More laws*} (*Because A and B could differ on the "other" part of the state, cannot generalize to project_set h (A \<inter> B) = project_set h A \<inter> project_set h B *) lemma (in Extend) project_set_extend_set_Int: "project_set h ((extend_set h A) \<inter> B) = A \<inter> (project_set h B)" by auto (*Unused, but interesting?*) lemma (in Extend) project_set_extend_set_Un: "project_set h ((extend_set h A) \<union> B) = A \<union> (project_set h B)" by auto lemma project_set_Int_subset: "project_set h (A \<inter> B) \<subseteq> (project_set h A) \<inter> (project_set h B)" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_Un_distrib: "extend_set h (A \<union> B) = extend_set h A \<union> extend_set h B" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_Int_distrib: "extend_set h (A \<inter> B) = extend_set h A \<inter> extend_set h B" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_INT_distrib: "extend_set h (INTER A B) = (\<Inter>x \<in> A. extend_set h (B x))" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_Diff_distrib: "extend_set h (A - B) = extend_set h A - extend_set h B" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_set_Union: "extend_set h (Union A) = (\<Union>X \<in> A. extend_set h X)" by blast lemma (in Extend) extend_set_subset_Compl_eq: "(extend_set h A \<subseteq> - extend_set h B) = (A \<subseteq> - B)" by (unfold extend_set_def, auto) subsection{*@{term extend_act}*} (*Can't strengthen it to ((h(s,y), h(s',y')) \<in> extend_act h act) = ((s, s') \<in> act & y=y') because h doesn't have to be injective in the 2nd argument*) lemma (in Extend) mem_extend_act_iff [iff]: "((h(s,y), h(s',y)) \<in> extend_act h act) = ((s, s') \<in> act)" by (unfold extend_act_def, auto) (*Converse fails: (z,z') would include actions that changed the g-part*) lemma (in Extend) extend_act_D: "(z, z') \<in> extend_act h act ==> (f z, f z') \<in> act" by (unfold extend_act_def, auto) lemma (in Extend) extend_act_inverse [simp]: "project_act h (extend_act h act) = act" by (unfold extend_act_def project_act_def, blast) lemma (in Extend) project_act_extend_act_restrict [simp]: "project_act h (Restrict C (extend_act h act)) = Restrict (project_set h C) act" by (unfold extend_act_def project_act_def, blast) lemma (in Extend) subset_extend_act_D: "act' \<subseteq> extend_act h act ==> project_act h act' \<subseteq> act" by (unfold extend_act_def project_act_def, force) lemma (in Extend) inj_extend_act: "inj (extend_act h)" apply (rule inj_on_inverseI) apply (rule extend_act_inverse) done lemma (in Extend) extend_act_Image [simp]: "extend_act h act `` (extend_set h A) = extend_set h (act `` A)" by (unfold extend_set_def extend_act_def, force) lemma (in Extend) extend_act_strict_mono [iff]: "(extend_act h act' \<subseteq> extend_act h act) = (act'<=act)" by (unfold extend_act_def, auto) declare (in Extend) inj_extend_act [THEN inj_eq, iff] (*This theorem is (extend_act h act' = extend_act h act) = (act'=act) *) lemma Domain_extend_act: "Domain (extend_act h act) = extend_set h (Domain act)" by (unfold extend_set_def extend_act_def, force) lemma (in Extend) extend_act_Id [simp]: "extend_act h Id = Id" apply (unfold extend_act_def) apply (force intro: h_f_g_eq [symmetric]) done lemma (in Extend) project_act_I: "!!z z'. (z, z') \<in> act ==> (f z, f z') \<in> project_act h act" apply (unfold project_act_def) apply (force simp add: split_extended_all) done lemma (in Extend) project_act_Id [simp]: "project_act h Id = Id" by (unfold project_act_def, force) lemma (in Extend) Domain_project_act: "Domain (project_act h act) = project_set h (Domain act)" apply (unfold project_act_def) apply (force simp add: split_extended_all) done subsection{*extend*} text{*Basic properties*} lemma Init_extend [simp]: "Init (extend h F) = extend_set h (Init F)" by (unfold extend_def, auto) lemma Init_project [simp]: "Init (project h C F) = project_set h (Init F)" by (unfold project_def, auto) lemma (in Extend) Acts_extend [simp]: "Acts (extend h F) = (extend_act h ` Acts F)" by (simp add: extend_def insert_Id_image_Acts) lemma (in Extend) AllowedActs_extend [simp]: "AllowedActs (extend h F) = project_act h -` AllowedActs F" by (simp add: extend_def insert_absorb) lemma Acts_project [simp]: "Acts(project h C F) = insert Id (project_act h ` Restrict C ` Acts F)" by (auto simp add: project_def image_iff) lemma (in Extend) AllowedActs_project [simp]: "AllowedActs(project h C F) = {act. Restrict (project_set h C) act \<in> project_act h ` Restrict C ` AllowedActs F}" apply (simp (no_asm) add: project_def image_iff) apply (subst insert_absorb) apply (auto intro!: bexI [of _ Id] simp add: project_act_def) done lemma (in Extend) Allowed_extend: "Allowed (extend h F) = project h UNIV -` Allowed F" by (auto simp add: Allowed_def) lemma (in Extend) extend_SKIP [simp]: "extend h SKIP = SKIP" apply (unfold SKIP_def) apply (rule program_equalityI, auto) done lemma project_set_UNIV [simp]: "project_set h UNIV = UNIV" by auto lemma project_set_Union: "project_set h (Union A) = (\<Union>X \<in> A. project_set h X)" by blast (*Converse FAILS: the extended state contributing to project_set h C may not coincide with the one contributing to project_act h act*) lemma (in Extend) project_act_Restrict_subset: "project_act h (Restrict C act) \<subseteq> Restrict (project_set h C) (project_act h act)" by (auto simp add: project_act_def) lemma (in Extend) project_act_Restrict_Id_eq: "project_act h (Restrict C Id) = Restrict (project_set h C) Id" by (auto simp add: project_act_def) lemma (in Extend) project_extend_eq: "project h C (extend h F) = mk_program (Init F, Restrict (project_set h C) ` Acts F, {act. Restrict (project_set h C) act \<in> project_act h ` Restrict C ` (project_act h -` AllowedActs F)})" apply (rule program_equalityI) apply simp apply (simp add: image_eq_UN) apply (simp add: project_def) done lemma (in Extend) extend_inverse [simp]: "project h UNIV (extend h F) = F" apply (simp (no_asm_simp) add: project_extend_eq image_eq_UN subset_UNIV [THEN subset_trans, THEN Restrict_triv]) apply (rule program_equalityI) apply (simp_all (no_asm)) apply (subst insert_absorb) apply (simp (no_asm) add: bexI [of _ Id]) apply auto apply (rename_tac "act") apply (rule_tac x = "extend_act h act" in bexI, auto) done lemma (in Extend) inj_extend: "inj (extend h)" apply (rule inj_on_inverseI) apply (rule extend_inverse) done lemma (in Extend) extend_Join [simp]: "extend h (F\<squnion>G) = extend h F\<squnion>extend h G" apply (rule program_equalityI) apply (simp (no_asm) add: extend_set_Int_distrib) apply (simp add: image_Un, auto) done lemma (in Extend) extend_JN [simp]: "extend h (JOIN I F) = (\<Squnion>i \<in> I. extend h (F i))" apply (rule program_equalityI) apply (simp (no_asm) add: extend_set_INT_distrib) apply (simp add: image_UN, auto) done (** These monotonicity results look natural but are UNUSED **) lemma (in Extend) extend_mono: "F \<le> G ==> extend h F \<le> extend h G" by (force simp add: component_eq_subset) lemma (in Extend) project_mono: "F \<le> G ==> project h C F \<le> project h C G" by (simp add: component_eq_subset, blast) lemma (in Extend) all_total_extend: "all_total F ==> all_total (extend h F)" by (simp add: all_total_def Domain_extend_act) subsection{*Safety: co, stable*} lemma (in Extend) extend_constrains: "(extend h F \<in> (extend_set h A) co (extend_set h B)) = (F \<in> A co B)" by (simp add: constrains_def) lemma (in Extend) extend_stable: "(extend h F \<in> stable (extend_set h A)) = (F \<in> stable A)" by (simp add: stable_def extend_constrains) lemma (in Extend) extend_invariant: "(extend h F \<in> invariant (extend_set h A)) = (F \<in> invariant A)" by (simp add: invariant_def extend_stable) (*Projects the state predicates in the property satisfied by extend h F. Converse fails: A and B may differ in their extra variables*) lemma (in Extend) extend_constrains_project_set: "extend h F \<in> A co B ==> F \<in> (project_set h A) co (project_set h B)" by (auto simp add: constrains_def, force) lemma (in Extend) extend_stable_project_set: "extend h F \<in> stable A ==> F \<in> stable (project_set h A)" by (simp add: stable_def extend_constrains_project_set) subsection{*Weak safety primitives: Co, Stable*} lemma (in Extend) reachable_extend_f: "p \<in> reachable (extend h F) ==> f p \<in> reachable F" apply (erule reachable.induct) apply (auto intro: reachable.intros simp add: extend_act_def image_iff) done lemma (in Extend) h_reachable_extend: "h(s,y) \<in> reachable (extend h F) ==> s \<in> reachable F" by (force dest!: reachable_extend_f) lemma (in Extend) reachable_extend_eq: "reachable (extend h F) = extend_set h (reachable F)" apply (unfold extend_set_def) apply (rule equalityI) apply (force intro: h_f_g_eq [symmetric] dest!: reachable_extend_f, clarify) apply (erule reachable.induct) apply (force intro: reachable.intros)+ done lemma (in Extend) extend_Constrains: "(extend h F \<in> (extend_set h A) Co (extend_set h B)) = (F \<in> A Co B)" by (simp add: Constrains_def reachable_extend_eq extend_constrains extend_set_Int_distrib [symmetric]) lemma (in Extend) extend_Stable: "(extend h F \<in> Stable (extend_set h A)) = (F \<in> Stable A)" by (simp add: Stable_def extend_Constrains) lemma (in Extend) extend_Always: "(extend h F \<in> Always (extend_set h A)) = (F \<in> Always A)" by (simp (no_asm_simp) add: Always_def extend_Stable) (** Safety and "project" **) (** projection: monotonicity for safety **) lemma project_act_mono: "D \<subseteq> C ==> project_act h (Restrict D act) \<subseteq> project_act h (Restrict C act)" by (auto simp add: project_act_def) lemma (in Extend) project_constrains_mono: "[| D \<subseteq> C; project h C F \<in> A co B |] ==> project h D F \<in> A co B" apply (auto simp add: constrains_def) apply (drule project_act_mono, blast) done lemma (in Extend) project_stable_mono: "[| D \<subseteq> C; project h C F \<in> stable A |] ==> project h D F \<in> stable A" by (simp add: stable_def project_constrains_mono) (*Key lemma used in several proofs about project and co*) lemma (in Extend) project_constrains: "(project h C F \<in> A co B) = (F \<in> (C \<inter> extend_set h A) co (extend_set h B) & A \<subseteq> B)" apply (unfold constrains_def) apply (auto intro!: project_act_I simp add: ball_Un) apply (force intro!: project_act_I dest!: subsetD) (*the <== direction*) apply (unfold project_act_def) apply (force dest!: subsetD) done lemma (in Extend) project_stable: "(project h UNIV F \<in> stable A) = (F \<in> stable (extend_set h A))" apply (unfold stable_def) apply (simp (no_asm) add: project_constrains) done lemma (in Extend) project_stable_I: "F \<in> stable (extend_set h A) ==> project h C F \<in> stable A" apply (drule project_stable [THEN iffD2]) apply (blast intro: project_stable_mono) done lemma (in Extend) Int_extend_set_lemma: "A \<inter> extend_set h ((project_set h A) \<inter> B) = A \<inter> extend_set h B" by (auto simp add: split_extended_all) (*Strange (look at occurrences of C) but used in leadsETo proofs*) lemma project_constrains_project_set: "G \<in> C co B ==> project h C G \<in> project_set h C co project_set h B" by (simp add: constrains_def project_def project_act_def, blast) lemma project_stable_project_set: "G \<in> stable C ==> project h C G \<in> stable (project_set h C)" by (simp add: stable_def project_constrains_project_set) subsection{*Progress: transient, ensures*} lemma (in Extend) extend_transient: "(extend h F \<in> transient (extend_set h A)) = (F \<in> transient A)" by (auto simp add: transient_def extend_set_subset_Compl_eq Domain_extend_act) lemma (in Extend) extend_ensures: "(extend h F \<in> (extend_set h A) ensures (extend_set h B)) = (F \<in> A ensures B)" by (simp add: ensures_def extend_constrains extend_transient extend_set_Un_distrib [symmetric] extend_set_Diff_distrib [symmetric]) lemma (in Extend) leadsTo_imp_extend_leadsTo: "F \<in> A leadsTo B ==> extend h F \<in> (extend_set h A) leadsTo (extend_set h B)" apply (erule leadsTo_induct) apply (simp add: leadsTo_Basis extend_ensures) apply (blast intro: leadsTo_Trans) apply (simp add: leadsTo_UN extend_set_Union) done subsection{*Proving the converse takes some doing!*} lemma (in Extend) slice_iff [iff]: "(x \<in> slice C y) = (h(x,y) \<in> C)" by (simp (no_asm) add: slice_def) lemma (in Extend) slice_Union: "slice (Union S) y = (\<Union>x \<in> S. slice x y)" by auto lemma (in Extend) slice_extend_set: "slice (extend_set h A) y = A" by auto lemma (in Extend) project_set_is_UN_slice: "project_set h A = (\<Union>y. slice A y)" by auto lemma (in Extend) extend_transient_slice: "extend h F \<in> transient A ==> F \<in> transient (slice A y)" by (unfold transient_def, auto) (*Converse?*) lemma (in Extend) extend_constrains_slice: "extend h F \<in> A co B ==> F \<in> (slice A y) co (slice B y)" by (auto simp add: constrains_def) lemma (in Extend) extend_ensures_slice: "extend h F \<in> A ensures B ==> F \<in> (slice A y) ensures (project_set h B)" apply (auto simp add: ensures_def extend_constrains extend_transient) apply (erule_tac [2] extend_transient_slice [THEN transient_strengthen]) apply (erule extend_constrains_slice [THEN constrains_weaken], auto) done lemma (in Extend) leadsTo_slice_project_set: "\<forall>y. F \<in> (slice B y) leadsTo CU ==> F \<in> (project_set h B) leadsTo CU" apply (simp (no_asm) add: project_set_is_UN_slice) apply (blast intro: leadsTo_UN) done lemma (in Extend) extend_leadsTo_slice [rule_format]: "extend h F \<in> AU leadsTo BU ==> \<forall>y. F \<in> (slice AU y) leadsTo (project_set h BU)" apply (erule leadsTo_induct) apply (blast intro: extend_ensures_slice) apply (blast intro: leadsTo_slice_project_set leadsTo_Trans) apply (simp add: leadsTo_UN slice_Union) done lemma (in Extend) extend_leadsTo: "(extend h F \<in> (extend_set h A) leadsTo (extend_set h B)) = (F \<in> A leadsTo B)" apply safe apply (erule_tac [2] leadsTo_imp_extend_leadsTo) apply (drule extend_leadsTo_slice) apply (simp add: slice_extend_set) done lemma (in Extend) extend_LeadsTo: "(extend h F \<in> (extend_set h A) LeadsTo (extend_set h B)) = (F \<in> A LeadsTo B)" by (simp add: LeadsTo_def reachable_extend_eq extend_leadsTo extend_set_Int_distrib [symmetric]) subsection{*preserves*} lemma (in Extend) project_preserves_I: "G \<in> preserves (v o f) ==> project h C G \<in> preserves v" by (auto simp add: preserves_def project_stable_I extend_set_eq_Collect) (*to preserve f is to preserve the whole original state*) lemma (in Extend) project_preserves_id_I: "G \<in> preserves f ==> project h C G \<in> preserves id" by (simp add: project_preserves_I) lemma (in Extend) extend_preserves: "(extend h G \<in> preserves (v o f)) = (G \<in> preserves v)" by (auto simp add: preserves_def extend_stable [symmetric] extend_set_eq_Collect) lemma (in Extend) inj_extend_preserves: "inj h ==> (extend h G \<in> preserves g)" by (auto simp add: preserves_def extend_def extend_act_def stable_def constrains_def g_def) subsection{*Guarantees*} lemma (in Extend) project_extend_Join: "project h UNIV ((extend h F)\<squnion>G) = F\<squnion>(project h UNIV G)" apply (rule program_equalityI) apply (simp add: project_set_extend_set_Int) apply (auto simp add: image_eq_UN) done lemma (in Extend) extend_Join_eq_extend_D: "(extend h F)\<squnion>G = extend h H ==> H = F\<squnion>(project h UNIV G)" apply (drule_tac f = "project h UNIV" in arg_cong) apply (simp add: project_extend_Join) done (** Strong precondition and postcondition; only useful when the old and new state sets are in bijection **) lemma (in Extend) ok_extend_imp_ok_project: "extend h F ok G ==> F ok project h UNIV G" apply (auto simp add: ok_def) apply (drule subsetD) apply (auto intro!: rev_image_eqI) done lemma (in Extend) ok_extend_iff: "(extend h F ok extend h G) = (F ok G)" apply (simp add: ok_def, safe) apply (force+) done lemma (in Extend) OK_extend_iff: "OK I (%i. extend h (F i)) = (OK I F)" apply (unfold OK_def, safe) apply (drule_tac x = i in bspec) apply (drule_tac [2] x = j in bspec) apply (force+) done lemma (in Extend) guarantees_imp_extend_guarantees: "F \<in> X guarantees Y ==> extend h F \<in> (extend h ` X) guarantees (extend h ` Y)" apply (rule guaranteesI, clarify) apply (blast dest: ok_extend_imp_ok_project extend_Join_eq_extend_D guaranteesD) done lemma (in Extend) extend_guarantees_imp_guarantees: "extend h F \<in> (extend h ` X) guarantees (extend h ` Y) ==> F \<in> X guarantees Y" apply (auto simp add: guar_def) apply (drule_tac x = "extend h G" in spec) apply (simp del: extend_Join add: extend_Join [symmetric] ok_extend_iff inj_extend [THEN inj_image_mem_iff]) done lemma (in Extend) extend_guarantees_eq: "(extend h F \<in> (extend h ` X) guarantees (extend h ` Y)) = (F \<in> X guarantees Y)" by (blast intro: guarantees_imp_extend_guarantees extend_guarantees_imp_guarantees) end