| author | wenzelm | 
| Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:54:50 +0100 | |
| changeset 46716 | c45a4427db39 | 
| parent 37936 | 1e4c5015a72e | 
| child 46911 | 6d2a2f0e904e | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
(* Title: HOL/UNITY/Simple/Token.thy Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory Copyright 1998 University of Cambridge *) header {*The Token Ring*} theory Token imports "../WFair" begin text{*From Misra, "A Logic for Concurrent Programming" (1994), sections 5.2 and 13.2.*} subsection{*Definitions*} datatype pstate = Hungry | Eating | Thinking --{*process states*} record state = token :: "nat" proc :: "nat => pstate" definition HasTok :: "nat => state set" where "HasTok i == {s. token s = i}" definition H :: "nat => state set" where "H i == {s. proc s i = Hungry}" definition E :: "nat => state set" where "E i == {s. proc s i = Eating}" definition T :: "nat => state set" where "T i == {s. proc s i = Thinking}" locale Token = fixes N and F and nodeOrder and "next" defines nodeOrder_def: "nodeOrder j == measure(%i. ((j+N)-i) mod N) \<inter> {..<N} \<times> {..<N}" and next_def: "next i == (Suc i) mod N" assumes N_positive [iff]: "0<N" and TR2: "F \<in> (T i) co (T i \<union> H i)" and TR3: "F \<in> (H i) co (H i \<union> E i)" and TR4: "F \<in> (H i - HasTok i) co (H i)" and TR5: "F \<in> (HasTok i) co (HasTok i \<union> -(E i))" and TR6: "F \<in> (H i \<inter> HasTok i) leadsTo (E i)" and TR7: "F \<in> (HasTok i) leadsTo (HasTok (next i))" lemma HasToK_partition: "[| s \<in> HasTok i; s \<in> HasTok j |] ==> i=j" by (unfold HasTok_def, auto) lemma not_E_eq: "(s \<notin> E i) = (s \<in> H i | s \<in> T i)" apply (simp add: H_def E_def T_def) apply (case_tac "proc s i", auto) done lemma (in Token) token_stable: "F \<in> stable (-(E i) \<union> (HasTok i))" apply (unfold stable_def) apply (rule constrains_weaken) apply (rule constrains_Un [OF constrains_Un [OF TR2 TR4] TR5]) apply (auto simp add: not_E_eq) apply (simp_all add: H_def E_def T_def) done subsection{*Progress under Weak Fairness*} lemma (in Token) wf_nodeOrder: "wf(nodeOrder j)" apply (unfold nodeOrder_def) apply (rule wf_measure [THEN wf_subset], blast) done lemma (in Token) nodeOrder_eq: "[| i<N; j<N |] ==> ((next i, i) \<in> nodeOrder j) = (i \<noteq> j)" apply (unfold nodeOrder_def next_def) apply (auto simp add: mod_Suc mod_geq) apply (auto split add: nat_diff_split simp add: linorder_neq_iff mod_geq) done text{*From "A Logic for Concurrent Programming", but not used in Chapter 4. Note the use of @{text case_tac}. Reasoning about leadsTo takes practice!*} lemma (in Token) TR7_nodeOrder: "[| i<N; j<N |] ==> F \<in> (HasTok i) leadsTo ({s. (token s, i) \<in> nodeOrder j} \<union> HasTok j)" apply (case_tac "i=j") apply (blast intro: subset_imp_leadsTo) apply (rule TR7 [THEN leadsTo_weaken_R]) apply (auto simp add: HasTok_def nodeOrder_eq) done text{*Chapter 4 variant, the one actually used below.*} lemma (in Token) TR7_aux: "[| i<N; j<N; i\<noteq>j |] ==> F \<in> (HasTok i) leadsTo {s. (token s, i) \<in> nodeOrder j}" apply (rule TR7 [THEN leadsTo_weaken_R]) apply (auto simp add: HasTok_def nodeOrder_eq) done lemma (in Token) token_lemma: "({s. token s < N} \<inter> token -` {m}) = (if m<N then token -` {m} else {})" by auto text{*Misra's TR9: the token reaches an arbitrary node*} lemma (in Token) leadsTo_j: "j<N ==> F \<in> {s. token s < N} leadsTo (HasTok j)" apply (rule leadsTo_weaken_R) apply (rule_tac I = "-{j}" and f = token and B = "{}" in wf_nodeOrder [THEN bounded_induct]) apply (simp_all (no_asm_simp) add: token_lemma vimage_Diff HasTok_def) prefer 2 apply blast apply clarify apply (rule TR7_aux [THEN leadsTo_weaken]) apply (auto simp add: HasTok_def nodeOrder_def) done text{*Misra's TR8: a hungry process eventually eats*} lemma (in Token) token_progress: "j<N ==> F \<in> ({s. token s < N} \<inter> H j) leadsTo (E j)" apply (rule leadsTo_cancel1 [THEN leadsTo_Un_duplicate]) apply (rule_tac [2] TR6) apply (rule psp [OF leadsTo_j TR3, THEN leadsTo_weaken], blast+) done end