Removed ~10000 hack in function idx that can lead to inconsistencies
when unifying terms with a large number of abstractions.
(*<*)
theory Tree2 = Tree:
(*>*)
text{*\noindent In Exercise~\ref{ex:Tree} we defined a function
@{term"flatten"} from trees to lists. The straightforward version of
@{term"flatten"} is based on @{text"@"} and is thus, like @{term"rev"},
quadratic. A linear time version of @{term"flatten"} again reqires an extra
argument, the accumulator: *}
consts flatten2 :: "'a tree \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> 'a list"
(*<*)
primrec
"flatten2 Tip xs = xs"
"flatten2 (Node l x r) xs = flatten2 l (x#(flatten2 r xs))"
(*>*)
text{*\noindent Define @{term"flatten2"} and prove
*}
(*<*)
lemma [simp]: "!xs. flatten2 t xs = flatten t @ xs";
apply(induct_tac t);
by(auto);
(*>*)
lemma "flatten2 t [] = flatten t";
(*<*)
by(simp);
end
(*>*)