(* Title: HOL/Quotient_Examples/Int_Pow.thy
Author: Ondrej Kuncar
Author: Lars Noschinski
*)
theory Int_Pow
imports Main "HOL-Algebra.Group"
begin
(*
This file demonstrates how to restore Lifting/Transfer enviromenent.
We want to define int_pow (a power with an integer exponent) by directly accessing
the representation type "nat * nat" that was used to define integers.
*)
context monoid
begin
(* first some additional lemmas that are missing in monoid *)
lemma Units_nat_pow_Units [intro, simp]:
"a \<in> Units G \<Longrightarrow> a [^] (c :: nat) \<in> Units G" by (induct c) auto
lemma Units_r_cancel [simp]:
"[| z \<in> Units G; x \<in> carrier G; y \<in> carrier G |] ==>
(x \<otimes> z = y \<otimes> z) = (x = y)"
proof
assume eq: "x \<otimes> z = y \<otimes> z"
and G: "z \<in> Units G" "x \<in> carrier G" "y \<in> carrier G"
then have "x \<otimes> (z \<otimes> inv z) = y \<otimes> (z \<otimes> inv z)"
by (simp add: m_assoc[symmetric] Units_closed del: Units_r_inv)
with G show "x = y" by simp
next
assume eq: "x = y"
and G: "z \<in> Units G" "x \<in> carrier G" "y \<in> carrier G"
then show "x \<otimes> z = y \<otimes> z" by simp
qed
lemma inv_mult_units:
"[| x \<in> Units G; y \<in> Units G |] ==> inv (x \<otimes> y) = inv y \<otimes> inv x"
proof -
assume G: "x \<in> Units G" "y \<in> Units G"
then have "x \<in> carrier G" "y \<in> carrier G" by auto
with G have "inv (x \<otimes> y) \<otimes> (x \<otimes> y) = (inv y \<otimes> inv x) \<otimes> (x \<otimes> y)"
by (simp add: m_assoc) (simp add: m_assoc [symmetric])
with G show ?thesis by (simp del: Units_l_inv)
qed
lemma mult_same_comm:
assumes [simp, intro]: "a \<in> Units G"
shows "a [^] (m::nat) \<otimes> inv (a [^] (n::nat)) = inv (a [^] n) \<otimes> a [^] m"
proof (cases "m\<ge>n")
have [simp]: "a \<in> carrier G" using \<open>a \<in> _\<close> by (rule Units_closed)
case True
then obtain k where *:"m = k + n" and **:"m = n + k" by (metis le_iff_add add.commute)
have "a [^] (m::nat) \<otimes> inv (a [^] (n::nat)) = a [^] k"
using * by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc)
also have "\<dots> = inv (a [^] n) \<otimes> a [^] m"
using ** by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc[symmetric])
finally show ?thesis .
next
have [simp]: "a \<in> carrier G" using \<open>a \<in> _\<close> by (rule Units_closed)
case False
then obtain k where *:"n = k + m" and **:"n = m + k"
by (metis le_iff_add add.commute nat_le_linear)
have "a [^] (m::nat) \<otimes> inv (a [^] (n::nat)) = inv(a [^] k)"
using * by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc[symmetric] inv_mult_units)
also have "\<dots> = inv (a [^] n) \<otimes> a [^] m"
using ** by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc inv_mult_units)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma mult_inv_same_comm:
"a \<in> Units G \<Longrightarrow> inv (a [^] (m::nat)) \<otimes> inv (a [^] (n::nat)) = inv (a [^] n) \<otimes> inv (a [^] m)"
by (simp add: inv_mult_units[symmetric] nat_pow_mult ac_simps Units_closed)
context
includes int.lifting (* restores Lifting/Transfer for integers *)
begin
lemma int_pow_rsp:
assumes eq: "(b::nat) + e = d + c"
assumes a_in_G [simp, intro]: "a \<in> Units G"
shows "a [^] b \<otimes> inv (a [^] c) = a [^] d \<otimes> inv (a [^] e)"
proof(cases "b\<ge>c")
have [simp]: "a \<in> carrier G" using \<open>a \<in> _\<close> by (rule Units_closed)
case True
then obtain n where "b = n + c" by (metis le_iff_add add.commute)
then have "d = n + e" using eq by arith
from \<open>b = _\<close> have "a [^] b \<otimes> inv (a [^] c) = a [^] n"
by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc)
also from \<open>d = _\<close> have "\<dots> = a [^] d \<otimes> inv (a [^] e)"
by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc)
finally show ?thesis .
next
have [simp]: "a \<in> carrier G" using \<open>a \<in> _\<close> by (rule Units_closed)
case False
then obtain n where "c = n + b" by (metis le_iff_add add.commute nat_le_linear)
then have "e = n + d" using eq by arith
from \<open>c = _\<close> have "a [^] b \<otimes> inv (a [^] c) = inv (a [^] n)"
by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc[symmetric] inv_mult_units)
also from \<open>e = _\<close> have "\<dots> = a [^] d \<otimes> inv (a [^] e)"
by (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] m_assoc[symmetric] inv_mult_units)
finally show ?thesis .
qed
(*
This definition is more convinient than the definition in HOL/Algebra/Group because
it doesn't contain a test z < 0 when a [^] z is being defined.
*)
lift_definition int_pow :: "('a, 'm) monoid_scheme \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> 'a" is
"\<lambda>G a (n1, n2). if a \<in> Units G \<and> monoid G then (a [^]\<^bsub>G\<^esub> n1) \<otimes>\<^bsub>G\<^esub> (inv\<^bsub>G\<^esub> (a [^]\<^bsub>G\<^esub> n2)) else \<one>\<^bsub>G\<^esub>"
unfolding intrel_def by (auto intro: monoid.int_pow_rsp)
(*
Thus, for example, the proof of distributivity of int_pow and addition
doesn't require a substantial number of case distinctions.
*)
lemma int_pow_dist:
assumes [simp]: "a \<in> Units G"
shows "int_pow G a ((n::int) + m) = int_pow G a n \<otimes>\<^bsub>G\<^esub> int_pow G a m"
proof -
{
fix k l m :: nat
have "a [^] l \<otimes> (inv (a [^] m) \<otimes> inv (a [^] k)) = (a [^] l \<otimes> inv (a [^] k)) \<otimes> inv (a [^] m)"
(is "?lhs = _")
by (simp add: mult_inv_same_comm m_assoc Units_closed)
also have "\<dots> = (inv (a [^] k) \<otimes> a [^] l) \<otimes> inv (a [^] m)"
by (simp add: mult_same_comm)
also have "\<dots> = inv (a [^] k) \<otimes> (a [^] l \<otimes> inv (a [^] m))" (is "_ = ?rhs")
by (simp add: m_assoc Units_closed)
finally have "?lhs = ?rhs" .
}
then show ?thesis
by (transfer fixing: G) (auto simp add: nat_pow_mult[symmetric] inv_mult_units m_assoc Units_closed)
qed
end
lifting_update int.lifting
lifting_forget int.lifting
end
end