Removed a dependence upon Old_Number_Theory. Simplified a few proofs.
(* Title : NSPrimes.thy
Author : Jacques D. Fleuriot
Copyright : 2002 University of Edinburgh
Conversion to Isar and new proofs by Lawrence C Paulson, 2004
*)
header{*The Nonstandard Primes as an Extension of the Prime Numbers*}
theory NSPrimes
imports "~~/src/HOL/Number_Theory/UniqueFactorization" "../Hyperreal"
begin
text{*These can be used to derive an alternative proof of the infinitude of
primes by considering a property of nonstandard sets.*}
declare dvd_def [transfer_refold]
definition
starprime :: "hypnat set" where
[transfer_unfold]: "starprime = ( *s* {p. prime p})"
definition
choicefun :: "'a set => 'a" where
"choicefun E = (@x. \<exists>X \<in> Pow(E) -{{}}. x : X)"
primrec injf_max :: "nat => ('a::{order} set) => 'a"
where
injf_max_zero: "injf_max 0 E = choicefun E"
| injf_max_Suc: "injf_max (Suc n) E = choicefun({e. e:E & injf_max n E < e})"
lemma dvd_by_all: "\<forall>M. \<exists>N. 0 < N & (\<forall>m. 0 < m & (m::nat) <= M --> m dvd N)"
apply (rule allI)
apply (induct_tac "M", auto)
apply (rule_tac x = "N * (Suc n) " in exI)
by (metis dvd.order_refl dvd_mult dvd_mult2 le_Suc_eq nat_0_less_mult_iff zero_less_Suc)
lemmas dvd_by_all2 = dvd_by_all [THEN spec]
lemma hypnat_of_nat_le_zero_iff [simp]: "(hypnat_of_nat n <= 0) = (n = 0)"
by (transfer, simp)
(* Goldblatt: Exercise 5.11(2) - p. 57 *)
lemma hdvd_by_all: "\<forall>M. \<exists>N. 0 < N & (\<forall>m. 0 < m & (m::hypnat) <= M --> m dvd N)"
by (transfer, rule dvd_by_all)
lemmas hdvd_by_all2 = hdvd_by_all [THEN spec]
(* Goldblatt: Exercise 5.11(2) - p. 57 *)
lemma hypnat_dvd_all_hypnat_of_nat:
"\<exists>(N::hypnat). 0 < N & (\<forall>n \<in> -{0::nat}. hypnat_of_nat(n) dvd N)"
apply (cut_tac hdvd_by_all)
apply (drule_tac x = whn in spec, auto)
apply (rule exI, auto)
apply (drule_tac x = "hypnat_of_nat n" in spec)
apply (auto simp add: linorder_not_less)
done
text{*The nonstandard extension of the set prime numbers consists of precisely
those hypernaturals exceeding 1 that have no nontrivial factors*}
(* Goldblatt: Exercise 5.11(3a) - p 57 *)
lemma starprime:
"starprime = {p. 1 < p & (\<forall>m. m dvd p --> m = 1 | m = p)}"
by (transfer, auto simp add: prime_nat_def)
(* Goldblatt Exercise 5.11(3b) - p 57 *)
lemma hyperprime_factor_exists [rule_format]:
"!!n. 1 < n ==> (\<exists>k \<in> starprime. k dvd n)"
by (transfer, simp add: prime_factor_nat)
(* Goldblatt Exercise 3.10(1) - p. 29 *)
lemma NatStar_hypnat_of_nat: "finite A ==> *s* A = hypnat_of_nat ` A"
by (rule starset_finite)
subsection{*Another characterization of infinite set of natural numbers*}
lemma finite_nat_set_bounded: "finite N ==> \<exists>n. (\<forall>i \<in> N. i<(n::nat))"
apply (erule_tac F = N in finite_induct, auto)
apply (rule_tac x = "Suc n + x" in exI, auto)
done
lemma finite_nat_set_bounded_iff: "finite N = (\<exists>n. (\<forall>i \<in> N. i<(n::nat)))"
by (blast intro: finite_nat_set_bounded bounded_nat_set_is_finite)
lemma not_finite_nat_set_iff: "(~ finite N) = (\<forall>n. \<exists>i \<in> N. n <= (i::nat))"
by (auto simp add: finite_nat_set_bounded_iff not_less)
lemma bounded_nat_set_is_finite2: "(\<forall>i \<in> N. i<=(n::nat)) ==> finite N"
apply (rule finite_subset)
apply (rule_tac [2] finite_atMost, auto)
done
lemma finite_nat_set_bounded2: "finite N ==> \<exists>n. (\<forall>i \<in> N. i<=(n::nat))"
apply (erule_tac F = N in finite_induct, auto)
apply (rule_tac x = "n + x" in exI, auto)
done
lemma finite_nat_set_bounded_iff2: "finite N = (\<exists>n. (\<forall>i \<in> N. i<=(n::nat)))"
by (blast intro: finite_nat_set_bounded2 bounded_nat_set_is_finite2)
lemma not_finite_nat_set_iff2: "(~ finite N) = (\<forall>n. \<exists>i \<in> N. n < (i::nat))"
by (auto simp add: finite_nat_set_bounded_iff2 not_le)
subsection{*An injective function cannot define an embedded natural number*}
lemma lemma_infinite_set_singleton: "\<forall>m n. m \<noteq> n --> f n \<noteq> f m
==> {n. f n = N} = {} | (\<exists>m. {n. f n = N} = {m})"
apply auto
apply (drule_tac x = x in spec, auto)
apply (subgoal_tac "\<forall>n. (f n = f x) = (x = n) ")
apply auto
done
lemma inj_fun_not_hypnat_in_SHNat:
assumes inj_f: "inj (f::nat=>nat)"
shows "starfun f whn \<notin> Nats"
proof
from inj_f have inj_f': "inj (starfun f)"
by (transfer inj_on_def Ball_def UNIV_def)
assume "starfun f whn \<in> Nats"
then obtain N where N: "starfun f whn = hypnat_of_nat N"
by (auto simp add: Nats_def)
hence "\<exists>n. starfun f n = hypnat_of_nat N" ..
hence "\<exists>n. f n = N" by transfer
then obtain n where n: "f n = N" ..
hence "starfun f (hypnat_of_nat n) = hypnat_of_nat N"
by transfer
with N have "starfun f whn = starfun f (hypnat_of_nat n)"
by simp
with inj_f' have "whn = hypnat_of_nat n"
by (rule injD)
thus "False"
by (simp add: whn_neq_hypnat_of_nat)
qed
lemma range_subset_mem_starsetNat:
"range f <= A ==> starfun f whn \<in> *s* A"
apply (rule_tac x="whn" in spec)
apply (transfer, auto)
done
(*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*)
(* Gleason Proposition 11-5.5. pg 149, pg 155 (ex. 3) and pg. 360 *)
(* Let E be a nonvoid ordered set with no maximal elements (note: effectively an *)
(* infinite set if we take E = N (Nats)). Then there exists an order-preserving *)
(* injection from N to E. Of course, (as some doofus will undoubtedly point out! *)
(* :-)) can use notion of least element in proof (i.e. no need for choice) if *)
(* dealing with nats as we have well-ordering property *)
(*--------------------------------------------------------------------------------*)
lemma lemmaPow3: "E \<noteq> {} ==> \<exists>x. \<exists>X \<in> (Pow E - {{}}). x: X"
by auto
lemma choicefun_mem_set [simp]: "E \<noteq> {} ==> choicefun E \<in> E"
apply (unfold choicefun_def)
apply (rule lemmaPow3 [THEN someI2_ex], auto)
done
lemma injf_max_mem_set: "[| E \<noteq>{}; \<forall>x. \<exists>y \<in> E. x < y |] ==> injf_max n E \<in> E"
apply (induct_tac "n", force)
apply (simp (no_asm) add: choicefun_def)
apply (rule lemmaPow3 [THEN someI2_ex], auto)
done
lemma injf_max_order_preserving: "\<forall>x. \<exists>y \<in> E. x < y ==> injf_max n E < injf_max (Suc n) E"
apply (simp (no_asm) add: choicefun_def)
apply (rule lemmaPow3 [THEN someI2_ex], auto)
done
lemma injf_max_order_preserving2: "\<forall>x. \<exists>y \<in> E. x < y
==> \<forall>n m. m < n --> injf_max m E < injf_max n E"
apply (rule allI)
apply (induct_tac "n", auto)
apply (simp (no_asm) add: choicefun_def)
apply (rule lemmaPow3 [THEN someI2_ex])
apply (auto simp add: less_Suc_eq)
apply (drule_tac x = m in spec)
apply (drule subsetD, auto)
apply (drule_tac x = "injf_max m E" in order_less_trans, auto)
done
lemma inj_injf_max: "\<forall>x. \<exists>y \<in> E. x < y ==> inj (%n. injf_max n E)"
apply (rule inj_onI)
apply (rule ccontr, auto)
apply (drule injf_max_order_preserving2)
apply (metis linorder_antisym_conv3 order_less_le)
done
lemma infinite_set_has_order_preserving_inj:
"[| (E::('a::{order} set)) \<noteq> {}; \<forall>x. \<exists>y \<in> E. x < y |]
==> \<exists>f. range f <= E & inj (f::nat => 'a) & (\<forall>m. f m < f(Suc m))"
apply (rule_tac x = "%n. injf_max n E" in exI, safe)
apply (rule injf_max_mem_set)
apply (rule_tac [3] inj_injf_max)
apply (rule_tac [4] injf_max_order_preserving, auto)
done
text{*Only need the existence of an injective function from N to A for proof*}
lemma hypnat_infinite_has_nonstandard:
"~ finite A ==> hypnat_of_nat ` A < ( *s* A)"
apply auto
apply (subgoal_tac "A \<noteq> {}")
prefer 2 apply force
apply (drule infinite_set_has_order_preserving_inj)
apply (erule not_finite_nat_set_iff2 [THEN iffD1], auto)
apply (drule inj_fun_not_hypnat_in_SHNat)
apply (drule range_subset_mem_starsetNat)
apply (auto simp add: SHNat_eq)
done
lemma starsetNat_eq_hypnat_of_nat_image_finite: "*s* A = hypnat_of_nat ` A ==> finite A"
by (metis hypnat_infinite_has_nonstandard less_irrefl)
lemma finite_starsetNat_iff: "( *s* A = hypnat_of_nat ` A) = (finite A)"
by (blast intro!: starsetNat_eq_hypnat_of_nat_image_finite NatStar_hypnat_of_nat)
lemma hypnat_infinite_has_nonstandard_iff: "(~ finite A) = (hypnat_of_nat ` A < *s* A)"
apply (rule iffI)
apply (blast intro!: hypnat_infinite_has_nonstandard)
apply (auto simp add: finite_starsetNat_iff [symmetric])
done
subsection{*Existence of Infinitely Many Primes: a Nonstandard Proof*}
lemma lemma_not_dvd_hypnat_one [simp]: "~ (\<forall>n \<in> - {0}. hypnat_of_nat n dvd 1)"
apply auto
apply (rule_tac x = 2 in bexI)
apply (transfer, auto)
done
lemma lemma_not_dvd_hypnat_one2 [simp]: "\<exists>n \<in> - {0}. ~ hypnat_of_nat n dvd 1"
apply (cut_tac lemma_not_dvd_hypnat_one)
apply (auto simp del: lemma_not_dvd_hypnat_one)
done
lemma hypnat_add_one_gt_one:
"!!N. 0 < N ==> 1 < (N::hypnat) + 1"
by (transfer, simp)
lemma hypnat_of_nat_zero_not_prime [simp]: "hypnat_of_nat 0 \<notin> starprime"
by (transfer, simp)
lemma hypnat_zero_not_prime [simp]:
"0 \<notin> starprime"
by (cut_tac hypnat_of_nat_zero_not_prime, simp)
lemma hypnat_of_nat_one_not_prime [simp]: "hypnat_of_nat 1 \<notin> starprime"
by (transfer, simp)
lemma hypnat_one_not_prime [simp]: "1 \<notin> starprime"
by (cut_tac hypnat_of_nat_one_not_prime, simp)
lemma hdvd_diff: "!!k m n :: hypnat. [| k dvd m; k dvd n |] ==> k dvd (m - n)"
by (transfer, rule dvd_diff_nat)
lemma hdvd_one_eq_one: "!!x. x dvd (1::hypnat) ==> x = 1"
by (transfer, rule gcd_lcm_complete_lattice_nat.le_bot)
text{*Already proved as @{text primes_infinite}, but now using non-standard naturals.*}
theorem not_finite_prime: "~ finite {p::nat. prime p}"
apply (rule hypnat_infinite_has_nonstandard_iff [THEN iffD2])
apply (cut_tac hypnat_dvd_all_hypnat_of_nat)
apply (erule exE)
apply (erule conjE)
apply (subgoal_tac "1 < N + 1")
prefer 2 apply (blast intro: hypnat_add_one_gt_one)
apply (drule hyperprime_factor_exists)
apply auto
apply (subgoal_tac "k \<notin> hypnat_of_nat ` {p. prime p}")
apply (force simp add: starprime_def, safe)
apply (drule_tac x = x in bspec, auto)
apply (metis add_commute hdvd_diff hdvd_one_eq_one hypnat_diff_add_inverse2 hypnat_one_not_prime)
done
end