Thu, 24 May 2012 23:28:58 +0200 eliminated unused Cygwin download;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 23:28:58 +0200] rev 47997
eliminated unused Cygwin download;
Thu, 24 May 2012 23:13:06 +0200 simplified Cygwin root: warm start via env, cold start via property, no registry magic;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 23:13:06 +0200] rev 47996
simplified Cygwin root: warm start via env, cold start via property, no registry magic;
Thu, 24 May 2012 22:49:39 +0200 include scala-compiler.jar in basic Isabelle/Scala environment, to make Isabelle/jEdit console work with scala-2.10.0-M3;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 22:49:39 +0200] rev 47995
include scala-compiler.jar in basic Isabelle/Scala environment, to make Isabelle/jEdit console work with scala-2.10.0-M3;
Thu, 24 May 2012 22:41:27 +0200 tuned proofs;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 22:41:27 +0200] rev 47994
tuned proofs;
Thu, 24 May 2012 22:07:00 +0200 less warning in scala-2.10.0-M3;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 22:07:00 +0200] rev 47993
less warning in scala-2.10.0-M3;
Thu, 24 May 2012 21:46:11 +0200 avoid scala.tools.nsc.Interpreter -- deprecated in scala-2.9.0;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 21:46:11 +0200] rev 47992
avoid scala.tools.nsc.Interpreter -- deprecated in scala-2.9.0; discontinued support for scala-2.8.x;
Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:54 +0200 make Nitpick's handling of definitions more robust in the face of formulas that don't have the expected format (needed for soundness, cf. RNG100+1)
blanchet [Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:54 +0200] rev 47991
make Nitpick's handling of definitions more robust in the face of formulas that don't have the expected format (needed for soundness, cf. RNG100+1)
Thu, 24 May 2012 17:46:35 +0200 fixed soundness bug in Nitpick related to unfolding -- the unfolding criterion must at least as strict when looking at a definitional axiom as elsewhere, otherwise we end up unfolding a constant's definition in its own definition, yielding a trivial equality
blanchet [Thu, 24 May 2012 17:46:35 +0200] rev 47990
fixed soundness bug in Nitpick related to unfolding -- the unfolding criterion must at least as strict when looking at a definitional axiom as elsewhere, otherwise we end up unfolding a constant's definition in its own definition, yielding a trivial equality
Thu, 24 May 2012 17:42:47 +0200 more robust Swing_Thread.now: allow body to fail;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 17:42:47 +0200] rev 47989
more robust Swing_Thread.now: allow body to fail;
Thu, 24 May 2012 17:25:53 +0200 tuned proofs;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 17:25:53 +0200] rev 47988
tuned proofs;
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip