Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:33 +0200 special code setup for step function in IMP is redundant as definition was tuned (cf. c54d901d2946)
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:33 +0200] rev 49767
special code setup for step function in IMP is redundant as definition was tuned (cf. c54d901d2946)
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:17 +0200 test case for set_comprehension_pointfree simproc succeeds now
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:17 +0200] rev 49766
test case for set_comprehension_pointfree simproc succeeds now
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:52 +0200 unfolding bounded existential quantifiers as first step in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:52 +0200] rev 49765
unfolding bounded existential quantifiers as first step in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:43 +0200 moving simproc from Finite_Set to more appropriate Product_Type theory
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:43 +0200] rev 49764
moving simproc from Finite_Set to more appropriate Product_Type theory
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:21 +0200 generalizing set_comprehension_pointfree simproc to work for arbitrary predicates (and not just the finite predicate)
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:21 +0200] rev 49763
generalizing set_comprehension_pointfree simproc to work for arbitrary predicates (and not just the finite predicate)
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:41:18 +0200 adding some example that motivates some of the current changes in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:41:18 +0200] rev 49762
adding some example that motivates some of the current changes in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip