Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:54 +0200 make Nitpick's handling of definitions more robust in the face of formulas that don't have the expected format (needed for soundness, cf. RNG100+1)
blanchet [Thu, 24 May 2012 18:21:54 +0200] rev 47991
make Nitpick's handling of definitions more robust in the face of formulas that don't have the expected format (needed for soundness, cf. RNG100+1)
Thu, 24 May 2012 17:46:35 +0200 fixed soundness bug in Nitpick related to unfolding -- the unfolding criterion must at least as strict when looking at a definitional axiom as elsewhere, otherwise we end up unfolding a constant's definition in its own definition, yielding a trivial equality
blanchet [Thu, 24 May 2012 17:46:35 +0200] rev 47990
fixed soundness bug in Nitpick related to unfolding -- the unfolding criterion must at least as strict when looking at a definitional axiom as elsewhere, otherwise we end up unfolding a constant's definition in its own definition, yielding a trivial equality
Thu, 24 May 2012 17:42:47 +0200 more robust Swing_Thread.now: allow body to fail;
wenzelm [Thu, 24 May 2012 17:42:47 +0200] rev 47989
more robust Swing_Thread.now: allow body to fail;
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip