Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:55 +0200 adding necessary syntactic functions in set_comprehension_pointfree simproc as a first step to integrate an improved simproc
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:55 +0200] rev 49768
adding necessary syntactic functions in set_comprehension_pointfree simproc as a first step to integrate an improved simproc
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:33 +0200 special code setup for step function in IMP is redundant as definition was tuned (cf. c54d901d2946)
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:33 +0200] rev 49767
special code setup for step function in IMP is redundant as definition was tuned (cf. c54d901d2946)
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:17 +0200 test case for set_comprehension_pointfree simproc succeeds now
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:48:17 +0200] rev 49766
test case for set_comprehension_pointfree simproc succeeds now
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:52 +0200 unfolding bounded existential quantifiers as first step in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:52 +0200] rev 49765
unfolding bounded existential quantifiers as first step in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:43 +0200 moving simproc from Finite_Set to more appropriate Product_Type theory
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:43 +0200] rev 49764
moving simproc from Finite_Set to more appropriate Product_Type theory
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:21 +0200 generalizing set_comprehension_pointfree simproc to work for arbitrary predicates (and not just the finite predicate)
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:47:21 +0200] rev 49763
generalizing set_comprehension_pointfree simproc to work for arbitrary predicates (and not just the finite predicate)
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:41:18 +0200 adding some example that motivates some of the current changes in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:41:18 +0200] rev 49762
adding some example that motivates some of the current changes in the set_comprehension_pointfree simproc
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:41:16 +0200 set_comprehension_pointfree also handles terms where the equation is not at the first position, which is a necessary generalisation to eventually handle bounded existentials; tuned
bulwahn [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:41:16 +0200] rev 49761
set_comprehension_pointfree also handles terms where the equation is not at the first position, which is a necessary generalisation to eventually handle bounded existentials; tuned
Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:45:27 +0200 more consistent error messages on malformed code equations
haftmann [Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:45:27 +0200] rev 49760
more consistent error messages on malformed code equations
Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:33:46 +0200 removed support for set constant definitions in HOLCF {cpo,pcpo,domain}def commands;
huffman [Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:33:46 +0200] rev 49759
removed support for set constant definitions in HOLCF {cpo,pcpo,domain}def commands; removed '(open)', '(set_name)' and '(open set_name)' options
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip