wenzelm [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:57:20 +0200] rev 21000
Toplevel.local_theory_to_proof: proper target;
wenzelm [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:57:15 +0200] rev 20999
Toplevel.local_theory: proper target;
removed dead code;
urbanc [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:03:33 +0200] rev 20998
To be consistent with "induct", I renamed "fixing" to "arbitrary".
However I am not very fond of "arbitrary" - e.g. it clashes with
"arbitrary" of HOL. Both Gentzen (at least in the Szabo translation)
and Velleman (in How to prove it: a structured approach) use
"arbitrary".
Still, I wonder whether "generalising" is a good compromise?
paulson [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:50:43 +0200] rev 20997
Extended combinators now disabled
paulson [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:50:16 +0200] rev 20996
abstraction is now turned OFF...
paulson [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:48:13 +0200] rev 20995
Logging of theorem names to the /tmp directory now works
wenzelm [Thu, 12 Oct 2006 15:00:07 +0200] rev 20994
cc: avoid space after options;