Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:20:27 +0200 more abstract treatment of interrupts in structure Exn -- hardly ever need to mention Interrupt literally;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:20:27 +0200] rev 39232
more abstract treatment of interrupts in structure Exn -- hardly ever need to mention Interrupt literally;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:05:52 +0200 avoid mixing of static and runtime errors in compiler output, to accomodate Proof General;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:05:52 +0200] rev 39231
avoid mixing of static and runtime errors in compiler output, to accomodate Proof General; refrain from absorbing Exn.Interrupt, to accomodate asynchronous interaction; actually observe Isabelle/ML naming conventions in exception STATIC_ERRORS;
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -2 +2 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip