Thu, 02 Jan 2014 20:25:40 +0100 simplified code
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 20:25:40 +0100] rev 54916
simplified code
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 20:10:08 +0100 prevent tactic from getting out of sync and wrongly attack next subgoal
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 20:10:08 +0100] rev 54915
prevent tactic from getting out of sync and wrongly attack next subgoal
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:07:36 +0100 removed pointless warning (cf. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20233463/isabelle-metis-proof-state-contains-the-universal-sort/20785045#20785045)
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:07:36 +0100] rev 54914
removed pointless warning (cf. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20233463/isabelle-metis-proof-state-contains-the-universal-sort/20785045#20785045)
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 consider code as exhaustive
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54913
consider code as exhaustive
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 proper handling of corner case, take 2
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54912
proper handling of corner case, take 2
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 robustness
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54911
robustness
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 properly synchronize parallel lists
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54910
properly synchronize parallel lists
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 graceful handling of one-constructor case
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54909
graceful handling of one-constructor case
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 gracefully handle single-equation case, where 'nchotomy' is 'True'
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54908
gracefully handle single-equation case, where 'nchotomy' is 'True'
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 made tactic handle gracefully the case of missing constructors
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54907
made tactic handle gracefully the case of missing constructors
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 removed 'nchotomy' property
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54906
removed 'nchotomy' property
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 don't generate any proof obligation for implicit (de facto) exclusiveness
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54905
don't generate any proof obligation for implicit (de facto) exclusiveness
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 detect syntactic exhaustiveness
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54904
detect syntactic exhaustiveness
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 internally allow different values for 'exhaustive' for different constructors
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54903
internally allow different values for 'exhaustive' for different constructors
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100 internally allow different values for 'sequential' for different constructors
blanchet [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 09:50:22 +0100] rev 54902
internally allow different values for 'sequential' for different constructors
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip