Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:01:08 +0100 prefer explicit version information;
wenzelm [Wed, 04 Jan 2012 11:01:08 +0100] rev 46111
prefer explicit version information;
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:47:07 +0100 more Nitpick doc updates
blanchet [Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:47:07 +0100] rev 46110
more Nitpick doc updates
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:32:02 +0100 reenable Kodkodi in Mira now that Nitpick has been ported to 'a set constructor
blanchet [Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:32:02 +0100] rev 46109
reenable Kodkodi in Mira now that Nitpick has been ported to 'a set constructor
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:30:53 +0100 reenable Kodkodi in Isatest now that Nitpick has been ported to 'a set constructor
blanchet [Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:30:53 +0100] rev 46108
reenable Kodkodi in Isatest now that Nitpick has been ported to 'a set constructor
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:41:59 +0100 fixed bisimilarity axiom -- avoid "insert" with wrong type
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:41:59 +0100] rev 46107
fixed bisimilarity axiom -- avoid "insert" with wrong type
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:09:27 +0100 tuning
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:09:27 +0100] rev 46106
tuning
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:03:49 +0100 updated Nitpick docs after "set" reintroduction
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:03:49 +0100] rev 46105
updated Nitpick docs after "set" reintroduction
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 no abuse of notation
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46104
no abuse of notation
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 always treat "unit" as a deep datatype, so that we get a good interaction with the record syntax (2.7 of the Nitpick manual)
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46103
always treat "unit" as a deep datatype, so that we get a good interaction with the record syntax (2.7 of the Nitpick manual)
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 more robust destruction of "set Collect" idiom
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46102
more robust destruction of "set Collect" idiom
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip