Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:26:42 +0200 better error and minimizer output
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:26:42 +0200] rev 38094
better error and minimizer output
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:03:46 +0200 deal with chained facts more gracefully
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:03:46 +0200] rev 38093
deal with chained facts more gracefully
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:45:41 +0200 speed up the minimizer by using the time taken for the first iteration as a timeout for the following iterations, and fix a subtle bug in "string_for_failure"
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:45:41 +0200] rev 38092
speed up the minimizer by using the time taken for the first iteration as a timeout for the following iterations, and fix a subtle bug in "string_for_failure"
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:45:22 +0200 work around atomization failures
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:45:22 +0200] rev 38091
work around atomization failures
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:54:46 +0200 fiddle with the fudge factors, to get similar results as before
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:54:46 +0200] rev 38090
fiddle with the fudge factors, to get similar results as before
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:41:32 +0200 perform the presimplification done by Metis.make_nnf in Sledgehammer again, to deal with "If" and similar constructs
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:41:32 +0200] rev 38089
perform the presimplification done by Metis.make_nnf in Sledgehammer again, to deal with "If" and similar constructs
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:11:02 +0200 fix bug with "=" vs. "fequal" introduced by last change (dddb8ba3a1ce)
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:11:02 +0200] rev 38088
fix bug with "=" vs. "fequal" introduced by last change (dddb8ba3a1ce)
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:50:26 +0200 generate correct names for "$true" and "$false";
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:50:26 +0200] rev 38087
generate correct names for "$true" and "$false"; this was lost somewhere in the non-clausification
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:37:27 +0200 don't assume canonical rule format
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:37:27 +0200] rev 38086
don't assume canonical rule format
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:53:55 +0200 avoid "clause" and "cnf" terminology where it no longer makes sense
blanchet [Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:53:55 +0200] rev 38085
avoid "clause" and "cnf" terminology where it no longer makes sense
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip