Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:25:09 +0000 Repaired a proof that did, after all, refer to the theorem nat_induct2.
paulson [Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:25:09 +0000] rev 29855
Repaired a proof that did, after all, refer to the theorem nat_induct2.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -1 +1 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip