*** empty log message ***
authornipkow
Mon, 08 Jul 2002 14:59:46 +0200
changeset 13311 50d821437370
parent 13310 d694e65127ba
child 13312 ad91cf279f06
*** empty log message ***
doc-src/TutorialI/IsarOverview/Isar/Logic.thy
--- a/doc-src/TutorialI/IsarOverview/Isar/Logic.thy	Mon Jul 08 14:55:05 2002 +0200
+++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/IsarOverview/Isar/Logic.thy	Mon Jul 08 14:59:46 2002 +0200
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@
 proof -
   from A B show ?thesis
   proof induct
-    fix x assume "(x,z) \<in> r*"  -- "B[x := z]"
+    fix x assume "(x,z) \<in> r*"  -- "B[y := x]"
     thus "(x,z) \<in> r*" .
   next
     fix x' x y
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
 text{*\noindent We start the proof with \isakeyword{from}~@{text"A
 B"}. Only @{text A} is ``consumed'' by the first proof step, here
 induction. Since @{text B} is left over we don't just prove @{text
-?thesis} but in fact @{text"B \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"}, just as in the previous
+?thesis} but @{text"B \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"}, just as in the previous
 proof, only more elegantly. The base case is trivial. In the
 assumptions for the induction step we can see very clearly how things
 fit together and permit ourselves the obvious forward step