| Thu, 02 Dec 2010 14:56:16 +0100 | blanchet | give the Isabelle proof the benefice of the doubt when the Isabelle theorem has fewer literals than the Metis one -- this makes a difference on lemma "Let (x::'a, y::'a) (inv_image (r::'b * 'b => bool) (f::'a => 'b)) = ((f x, f y) : r)" apply (metis in_inv_image mem_def) | changeset | files |
| Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:03:21 +0100 | wenzelm | merged | changeset | files |
| Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:34:23 +0100 | nipkow | coercions | changeset | files |
| Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:59:40 +0100 | nipkow | merged | changeset | files |