author | blanchet |
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:35:56 +0200 | |
changeset 49325 | 340844cbf7af |
parent 49312 | c874ff5658dc |
child 49335 | 096967bf3940 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
49308
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
1 |
(* Title: HOL/Codatatype/BNF_FP.thy |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
2 |
Author: Dmitriy Traytel, TU Muenchen |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
3 |
Author: Jasmin Blanchette, TU Muenchen |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
4 |
Copyright 2012 |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
5 |
|
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
6 |
Composition of bounded natural functors. |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
7 |
*) |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
8 |
|
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
9 |
header {* Composition of Bounded Natural Functors *} |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
10 |
|
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
11 |
theory BNF_FP |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
12 |
imports BNF_Comp BNF_Wrap |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
13 |
keywords |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
14 |
"defaults" |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
15 |
begin |
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
16 |
|
49312 | 17 |
lemma case_unit: "(case u of () => f) = f" |
18 |
by (cases u) (hypsubst, rule unit.cases) |
|
19 |
||
20 |
(* FIXME: needed? *) |
|
21 |
lemma all_unit_eq: "(\<And>x. PROP P x) \<equiv> PROP P ()" by simp |
|
22 |
||
23 |
(* FIXME: needed? *) |
|
24 |
lemma all_prod_eq: "(\<And>x. PROP P x) \<equiv> (\<And>a b. PROP P (a, b))" by clarsimp |
|
25 |
||
26 |
(* FIXME: needed? *) |
|
27 |
lemma False_imp_eq: "(False \<Longrightarrow> P) \<equiv> Trueprop True" |
|
28 |
by presburger |
|
29 |
||
30 |
(* FIXME: needed? *) |
|
31 |
lemma all_point_1: "(\<And>z. z = b \<Longrightarrow> phi z) \<equiv> Trueprop (phi b)" |
|
32 |
by presburger |
|
33 |
||
34 |
lemma rev_bspec: "a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>z \<in> A. P z \<Longrightarrow> P a" |
|
35 |
by simp |
|
36 |
||
37 |
lemma Un_cong: "\<lbrakk>A = B; C = D\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> A \<union> C = B \<union> D" |
|
38 |
by simp |
|
39 |
||
40 |
definition convol ("<_ , _>") where |
|
41 |
"<f , g> \<equiv> %a. (f a, g a)" |
|
42 |
||
43 |
lemma fst_convol: |
|
44 |
"fst o <f , g> = f" |
|
45 |
apply(rule ext) |
|
46 |
unfolding convol_def by simp |
|
47 |
||
48 |
lemma snd_convol: |
|
49 |
"snd o <f , g> = g" |
|
50 |
apply(rule ext) |
|
51 |
unfolding convol_def by simp |
|
52 |
||
53 |
lemma pointfree_idE: "f o g = id \<Longrightarrow> f (g x) = x" |
|
54 |
unfolding o_def fun_eq_iff by simp |
|
55 |
||
56 |
lemma o_bij: |
|
57 |
assumes gf: "g o f = id" and fg: "f o g = id" |
|
58 |
shows "bij f" |
|
59 |
unfolding bij_def inj_on_def surj_def proof safe |
|
60 |
fix a1 a2 assume "f a1 = f a2" |
|
61 |
hence "g ( f a1) = g (f a2)" by simp |
|
62 |
thus "a1 = a2" using gf unfolding fun_eq_iff by simp |
|
63 |
next |
|
64 |
fix b |
|
65 |
have "b = f (g b)" |
|
66 |
using fg unfolding fun_eq_iff by simp |
|
67 |
thus "EX a. b = f a" by blast |
|
68 |
qed |
|
69 |
||
70 |
lemma ssubst_mem: "\<lbrakk>t = s; s \<in> X\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> t \<in> X" by simp |
|
71 |
||
72 |
lemma sum_case_step: |
|
73 |
"sum_case (sum_case f' g') g (Inl p) = sum_case f' g' p" |
|
74 |
"sum_case f (sum_case f' g') (Inr p) = sum_case f' g' p" |
|
75 |
by auto |
|
76 |
||
77 |
lemma one_pointE: "\<lbrakk>\<And>x. s = x \<Longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P" |
|
78 |
by simp |
|
79 |
||
80 |
lemma obj_one_pointE: "\<forall>x. s = x \<longrightarrow> P \<Longrightarrow> P" |
|
81 |
by blast |
|
82 |
||
49325 | 83 |
lemma obj_sumE_f': |
84 |
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. s = f (Inl x) \<longrightarrow> P; \<forall>x. s = f (Inr x) \<longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> s = f x \<longrightarrow> P" |
|
85 |
by (cases x) blast+ |
|
86 |
||
49312 | 87 |
lemma obj_sumE_f: |
88 |
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. s = f (Inl x) \<longrightarrow> P; \<forall>x. s = f (Inr x) \<longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. s = f x \<longrightarrow> P" |
|
49325 | 89 |
by (rule allI) (rule obj_sumE_f') |
49312 | 90 |
|
91 |
lemma obj_sumE: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. s = Inl x \<longrightarrow> P; \<forall>x. s = Inr x \<longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P" |
|
92 |
by (cases s) auto |
|
93 |
||
49325 | 94 |
lemma obj_sum_step': |
95 |
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. s = f (Inr (Inl x)) \<longrightarrow> P; \<forall>x. s = f (Inr (Inr x)) \<longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> s = f (Inr x) \<longrightarrow> P" |
|
96 |
by (cases x) blast+ |
|
97 |
||
49312 | 98 |
lemma obj_sum_step: |
49325 | 99 |
"\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. s = f (Inr (Inl x)) \<longrightarrow> P; \<forall>x. s = f (Inr (Inr x)) \<longrightarrow> P\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. s = f (Inr x) \<longrightarrow> P" |
100 |
by (rule allI) (rule obj_sum_step') |
|
49312 | 101 |
|
102 |
lemma sum_case_if: |
|
103 |
"sum_case f g (if p then Inl x else Inr y) = (if p then f x else g y)" |
|
104 |
by simp |
|
105 |
||
49309
f20b24214ac2
split basic BNFs into really basic ones and others, and added Andreas Lochbihler's "option" BNF
blanchet
parents:
49308
diff
changeset
|
106 |
ML_file "Tools/bnf_fp_util.ML" |
f20b24214ac2
split basic BNFs into really basic ones and others, and added Andreas Lochbihler's "option" BNF
blanchet
parents:
49308
diff
changeset
|
107 |
ML_file "Tools/bnf_fp_sugar_tactics.ML" |
f20b24214ac2
split basic BNFs into really basic ones and others, and added Andreas Lochbihler's "option" BNF
blanchet
parents:
49308
diff
changeset
|
108 |
ML_file "Tools/bnf_fp_sugar.ML" |
f20b24214ac2
split basic BNFs into really basic ones and others, and added Andreas Lochbihler's "option" BNF
blanchet
parents:
49308
diff
changeset
|
109 |
|
49308
6190b701e4f4
reorganized dependencies so that the sugar does not depend on GFP -- this will be essential for bootstrapping
blanchet
parents:
diff
changeset
|
110 |
end |