src/HOL/Divides.thy

removed redundant line

(*  Title:      HOL/Divides.thy
    ID:         $Id$
    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
    Copyright   1999  University of Cambridge

The division operators div, mod and the divides relation "dvd"
*)

theory Divides = NatArith files("Divides_lemmas.ML"):

(*We use the same class for div and mod;
  moreover, dvd is defined whenever multiplication is*)
axclass
  div < type

instance  nat :: div ..
instance  nat :: plus_ac0
proof qed (rule add_commute add_assoc add_0)+

consts
  div  :: "'a::div \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"          (infixl 70)
  mod  :: "'a::div \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"          (infixl 70)
  dvd  :: "'a::times \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"      (infixl 50)


defs

  mod_def:   "m mod n == wfrec (trancl pred_nat)
                          (%f j. if j<n | n=0 then j else f (j-n)) m"

  div_def:   "m div n == wfrec (trancl pred_nat) 
                          (%f j. if j<n | n=0 then 0 else Suc (f (j-n))) m"

(*The definition of dvd is polymorphic!*)
  dvd_def:   "m dvd n == EX k. n = m*k"

(*This definition helps prove the harder properties of div and mod.
  It is copied from IntDiv.thy; should it be overloaded?*)
constdefs
  quorem :: "(nat*nat) * (nat*nat) => bool"
    "quorem == %((a,b), (q,r)).
                      a = b*q + r &
                      (if 0<b then 0<=r & r<b else b<r & r <=0)"

use "Divides_lemmas.ML"

lemma split_div:
 "P(n div k :: nat) =
 ((k = 0 \<longrightarrow> P 0) \<and> (k \<noteq> 0 \<longrightarrow> (!i. !j<k. n = k*i + j \<longrightarrow> P i)))"
 (is "?P = ?Q" is "_ = (_ \<and> (_ \<longrightarrow> ?R))")
proof
  assume P: ?P
  show ?Q
  proof (cases)
    assume "k = 0"
    with P show ?Q by(simp add:DIVISION_BY_ZERO_DIV)
  next
    assume not0: "k \<noteq> 0"
    thus ?Q
    proof (simp, intro allI impI)
      fix i j
      assume n: "n = k*i + j" and j: "j < k"
      show "P i"
      proof (cases)
	assume "i = 0"
	with n j P show "P i" by simp
      next
	assume "i \<noteq> 0"
	with not0 n j P show "P i" by(simp add:add_ac)
      qed
    qed
  qed
next
  assume Q: ?Q
  show ?P
  proof (cases)
    assume "k = 0"
    with Q show ?P by(simp add:DIVISION_BY_ZERO_DIV)
  next
    assume not0: "k \<noteq> 0"
    with Q have R: ?R by simp
    from not0 R[THEN spec,of "n div k",THEN spec, of "n mod k"]
    show ?P by simp
  qed
qed

lemma split_div_lemma:
  "0 < n \<Longrightarrow> (n * q <= m \<and> m < n * (Suc q)) = (q = ((m::nat) div n))"
  apply (rule iffI)
  apply (rule_tac a=m and r = "m - n * q" and r' = "m mod n" in unique_quotient)
  apply (simp_all add: quorem_def)
  apply arith
  apply (rule conjI)
  apply (rule_tac P="%x. n * (m div n) \<le> x" in
    subst [OF mod_div_equality [of _ n]])
  apply (simp only: add: mult_ac)
  apply (rule_tac P="%x. x < n + n * (m div n)" in
    subst [OF mod_div_equality [of _ n]])
  apply (simp only: add: mult_ac add_ac)
  apply (rule add_less_mono1)
  apply simp
  done

theorem split_div':
  "P ((m::nat) div n) = ((n = 0 \<and> P 0) \<or>
   (\<exists>q. (n * q <= m \<and> m < n * (Suc q)) \<and> P q))"
  apply (case_tac "0 < n")
  apply (simp only: add: split_div_lemma)
  apply (simp_all add: DIVISION_BY_ZERO_DIV)
  done

lemma split_mod:
 "P(n mod k :: nat) =
 ((k = 0 \<longrightarrow> P n) \<and> (k \<noteq> 0 \<longrightarrow> (!i. !j<k. n = k*i + j \<longrightarrow> P j)))"
 (is "?P = ?Q" is "_ = (_ \<and> (_ \<longrightarrow> ?R))")
proof
  assume P: ?P
  show ?Q
  proof (cases)
    assume "k = 0"
    with P show ?Q by(simp add:DIVISION_BY_ZERO_MOD)
  next
    assume not0: "k \<noteq> 0"
    thus ?Q
    proof (simp, intro allI impI)
      fix i j
      assume "n = k*i + j" "j < k"
      thus "P j" using not0 P by(simp add:add_ac mult_ac)
    qed
  qed
next
  assume Q: ?Q
  show ?P
  proof (cases)
    assume "k = 0"
    with Q show ?P by(simp add:DIVISION_BY_ZERO_MOD)
  next
    assume not0: "k \<noteq> 0"
    with Q have R: ?R by simp
    from not0 R[THEN spec,of "n div k",THEN spec, of "n mod k"]
    show ?P by simp
  qed
qed

theorem mod_div_equality': "(m::nat) mod n = m - (m div n) * n"
  apply (rule_tac P="%x. m mod n = x - (m div n) * n" in
    subst [OF mod_div_equality [of _ n]])
  apply arith
  done

(*
lemma split_div:
assumes m: "m \<noteq> 0"
shows "P(n div m :: nat) = (!i. !j<m. n = m*i + j \<longrightarrow> P i)"
       (is "?P = ?Q")
proof
  assume P: ?P
  show ?Q
  proof (intro allI impI)
    fix i j
    assume n: "n = m*i + j" and j: "j < m"
    show "P i"
    proof (cases)
      assume "i = 0"
      with n j P show "P i" by simp
    next
      assume "i \<noteq> 0"
      with n j P show "P i" by (simp add:add_ac div_mult_self1)
    qed
  qed
next
  assume Q: ?Q
  from m Q[THEN spec,of "n div m",THEN spec, of "n mod m"]
  show ?P by simp
qed

lemma split_mod:
assumes m: "m \<noteq> 0"
shows "P(n mod m :: nat) = (!i. !j<m. n = m*i + j \<longrightarrow> P j)"
       (is "?P = ?Q")
proof
  assume P: ?P
  show ?Q
  proof (intro allI impI)
    fix i j
    assume "n = m*i + j" "j < m"
    thus "P j" using m P by(simp add:add_ac mult_ac)
  qed
next
  assume Q: ?Q
  from m Q[THEN spec,of "n div m",THEN spec, of "n mod m"]
  show ?P by simp
qed
*)
end