11479
|
1 |
(* Title: HOL/UNITY/WFair.ML
|
|
2 |
ID: $Id$
|
|
3 |
Author: Sidi O Ehmety, Computer Laboratory
|
|
4 |
Copyright 2001 University of Cambridge
|
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
Weak Fairness versions of transient, ensures, leadsTo.
|
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
From Misra, "A Logic for Concurrent Programming", 1994
|
|
9 |
*)
|
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
(*** transient ***)
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
Goalw [transient_def]
|
|
14 |
"F:transient(A) ==> F:program & A:condition";
|
|
15 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
16 |
qed "transientD";
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
Goalw [stable_def, constrains_def, transient_def]
|
|
19 |
"[| F : stable(A); F : transient(A) |] ==> A = 0";
|
|
20 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
21 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
22 |
qed "stable_transient_empty";
|
|
23 |
|
|
24 |
Goalw [transient_def]
|
|
25 |
"[| F : transient(A); B<=A |] ==> F : transient(B)";
|
|
26 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
27 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "act")] bexI 1);
|
|
28 |
by (ALLGOALS(Asm_full_simp_tac));
|
|
29 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
30 |
by (auto_tac (claset(),
|
|
31 |
simpset() addsimps [condition_def]));
|
|
32 |
qed "transient_strengthen";
|
|
33 |
|
|
34 |
Goalw [transient_def]
|
|
35 |
"[| act:Acts(F); A <= domain(act); act``A <= state-A; \
|
|
36 |
\ F:program; A:condition |] ==> F : transient(A)";
|
|
37 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
38 |
qed "transientI";
|
|
39 |
|
|
40 |
val major::prems =
|
|
41 |
Goalw [transient_def]
|
|
42 |
"[| F:transient(A); \
|
|
43 |
\ !!act. [| act:Acts(F); A <= domain(act); act``A <= state-A |] ==> P |] \
|
|
44 |
\ ==> P";
|
|
45 |
by (rtac (major RS CollectE) 1);
|
|
46 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs prems) 1);
|
|
47 |
qed "transientE";
|
|
48 |
|
|
49 |
Goalw [transient_def] "transient(state) = 0";
|
|
50 |
by (rtac equalityI 1);
|
|
51 |
by (ALLGOALS(Clarify_tac));
|
|
52 |
by (dtac ActsD 1);
|
|
53 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Diff_cancel]) 1);
|
|
54 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [state_subset_not_empty]) 1);
|
|
55 |
qed "transient_state";
|
|
56 |
|
|
57 |
Goalw [transient_def] "transient(0) = program";
|
|
58 |
by (rtac equalityI 1);
|
|
59 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
60 |
by (subgoal_tac "Id:Acts(x)" 1);
|
|
61 |
by (Asm_simp_tac 2);
|
|
62 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "Id")] bexI 1);
|
|
63 |
by (ALLGOALS(Blast_tac));
|
|
64 |
qed "transient_empty";
|
|
65 |
|
|
66 |
Addsimps [transient_empty, transient_state];
|
|
67 |
|
|
68 |
(*** ensures ***)
|
|
69 |
|
|
70 |
Goalw [ensures_def]
|
|
71 |
"[| F : (A-B) co (A Un B); F : transient(A-B) |] \
|
|
72 |
\ ==> F : A ensures B";
|
|
73 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
74 |
qed "ensuresI";
|
|
75 |
|
|
76 |
(** From Misra's notes, Progress chapter, exercise number 4 **)
|
|
77 |
Goal "[| F:A co A Un B; F: transient(A) |] ==> F: A ensures B";
|
|
78 |
by (dres_inst_tac [("B", "A-B")] constrains_weaken_L 1);
|
|
79 |
by (dres_inst_tac [("B", "A-B")] transient_strengthen 2);
|
|
80 |
by (auto_tac (claset(), simpset() addsimps [ensures_def]));
|
|
81 |
qed "ensuresI2";
|
|
82 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
84 |
Goalw [ensures_def]
|
|
85 |
"F : A ensures B ==> F : (A-B) co (A Un B) & F : transient (A-B)";
|
|
86 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
87 |
qed "ensuresD";
|
|
88 |
|
|
89 |
Goalw [ensures_def, constrains_def]
|
|
90 |
"F : A ensures B ==> F:program & A:condition & B:condition";
|
|
91 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
92 |
qed "ensuresD2";
|
|
93 |
|
|
94 |
Goalw [ensures_def]
|
|
95 |
"[| F : A ensures A'; A'<=B'; B':condition |] ==> F : A ensures B'";
|
|
96 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
97 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
98 |
addIs [transient_strengthen, constrains_weaken]
|
|
99 |
addDs [constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
100 |
qed "ensures_weaken_R";
|
|
101 |
|
|
102 |
(*The L-version (precondition strengthening) fails, but we have this*)
|
|
103 |
Goalw [ensures_def]
|
|
104 |
"[| F : stable(C); F : A ensures B |] \
|
|
105 |
\ ==> F : (C Int A) ensures (C Int B)";
|
|
106 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [ensures_def,
|
|
107 |
Int_Un_distrib2,
|
|
108 |
Diff_Int_distrib RS sym]) 1);
|
|
109 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
110 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
111 |
addIs [transient_strengthen,
|
|
112 |
stable_constrains_Int, constrains_weaken]
|
|
113 |
addDs [constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
114 |
qed "stable_ensures_Int";
|
|
115 |
|
|
116 |
Goal "[| F : stable(A); F : transient(C); \
|
|
117 |
\ A <= B Un C; B:condition|] ==> F : A ensures B";
|
|
118 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset()
|
|
119 |
addsimps [ensures_def, stable_def]) 1);
|
|
120 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
121 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [transient_strengthen,
|
|
122 |
constrains_weaken]
|
|
123 |
addDs [constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
124 |
qed "stable_transient_ensures";
|
|
125 |
|
|
126 |
Goal "(A ensures B) = (A unless B) Int transient (A-B)";
|
|
127 |
by (simp_tac (simpset()
|
|
128 |
addsimps [ensures_def, unless_def]) 1);
|
|
129 |
qed "ensures_eq";
|
|
130 |
|
|
131 |
(*** leadsTo ***)
|
|
132 |
|
|
133 |
val leads_lhs_subset = leads.dom_subset RS subsetD RS SigmaD1;
|
|
134 |
val leads_rhs_subset = leads.dom_subset RS subsetD RS SigmaD2;
|
|
135 |
|
|
136 |
Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
137 |
"F: A leadsTo B ==> F:program & A:condition & B:condition";
|
|
138 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leads_lhs_subset,
|
|
139 |
leads_rhs_subset]) 1);
|
|
140 |
qed "leadsToD";
|
|
141 |
|
|
142 |
Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
143 |
"F : A ensures B ==> F : A leadsTo B";
|
|
144 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [ensuresD2]
|
|
145 |
addIs [leads.Basis]) 1);
|
|
146 |
qed "leadsTo_Basis";
|
|
147 |
|
|
148 |
AddIs [leadsTo_Basis];
|
|
149 |
Addsimps [leadsTo_Basis];
|
|
150 |
|
|
151 |
Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
152 |
"[| F : A leadsTo B; F : B leadsTo C |] ==> F : A leadsTo C";
|
|
153 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leads.Trans]) 1);
|
|
154 |
qed "leadsTo_Trans";
|
|
155 |
|
|
156 |
(* To be move to State.thy *)
|
|
157 |
|
|
158 |
Goalw [condition_def]
|
|
159 |
"A:condition ==> state<=A <-> A=state";
|
|
160 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
161 |
qed "state_upper";
|
|
162 |
Addsimps [state_upper];
|
|
163 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
165 |
Goalw [transient_def]
|
|
166 |
"F : transient(A) ==> F : A leadsTo (state - A )";
|
|
167 |
by (rtac (ensuresI RS leadsTo_Basis) 1);
|
|
168 |
by (ALLGOALS(Clarify_tac));
|
|
169 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [transientI]) 2);
|
|
170 |
by (rtac constrains_weaken 1);
|
|
171 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
172 |
qed "transient_imp_leadsTo";
|
|
173 |
|
|
174 |
(*Useful with cancellation, disjunction*)
|
|
175 |
|
|
176 |
Goal "F : A leadsTo (A' Un A') ==> F : A leadsTo A'";
|
|
177 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps Un_ac) 1);
|
|
178 |
qed "leadsTo_Un_duplicate";
|
|
179 |
|
|
180 |
Goal "F : A leadsTo (A' Un C Un C) ==> F : A leadsTo (A' Un C)";
|
|
181 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps Un_ac) 1);
|
|
182 |
qed "leadsTo_Un_duplicate2";
|
|
183 |
|
|
184 |
(*The Union introduction rule as we should have liked to state it*)
|
|
185 |
Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
186 |
"[| ALL A:S. F : A leadsTo B; F:program; B:condition |]\
|
|
187 |
\ ==> F : Union(S) leadsTo B";
|
|
188 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
189 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leads.Union]
|
|
190 |
addDs [leads_lhs_subset]) 1);
|
|
191 |
bind_thm ("leadsTo_Union", ballI RS result());
|
|
192 |
|
|
193 |
Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
194 |
"[| ALL A:S. F: (A Int C) leadsTo B; F:program; B:condition |] \
|
|
195 |
\ ==> F : (Union(S) Int C) leadsTo B";
|
|
196 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
197 |
by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Int_Union_Union]) 1);
|
|
198 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leads.Union]
|
|
199 |
addDs [leads_lhs_subset, leads_rhs_subset]) 1);
|
|
200 |
bind_thm ("leadsTo_Union_Int", ballI RS result());
|
|
201 |
|
|
202 |
Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
203 |
"[| ALL i:I. F : (A(i)) leadsTo B; F:program; B:condition |] \
|
|
204 |
\ ==> F:(UN i:I. A(i)) leadsTo B";
|
|
205 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
206 |
by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Int_Union_Union]) 1);
|
|
207 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leads.Union]
|
|
208 |
addDs [leads_lhs_subset, leads_rhs_subset]) 1);
|
|
209 |
bind_thm ("leadsTo_UN", ballI RS result());
|
|
210 |
|
|
211 |
(*Binary union introduction rule*)
|
|
212 |
Goal "[| F: A leadsTo C; F: B leadsTo C |] ==> F : (A Un B) leadsTo C";
|
|
213 |
by (stac Un_eq_Union 1);
|
|
214 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Union]
|
|
215 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
216 |
qed "leadsTo_Un";
|
|
217 |
|
|
218 |
|
|
219 |
Goal "[| ALL x:A. F:{x} leadsTo B; \
|
|
220 |
\ F:program; B:condition |] ==> F : A leadsTo B";
|
|
221 |
by (res_inst_tac [("b", "A")] (UN_singleton RS subst) 1);
|
|
222 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_UN]) 1);
|
|
223 |
bind_thm("single_leadsTo_I", ballI RS result());
|
|
224 |
|
|
225 |
|
|
226 |
(*The INDUCTION rule as we should have liked to state it*)
|
|
227 |
val major::prems = Goalw [leadsTo_def]
|
|
228 |
"[| F: za leadsTo zb; \
|
|
229 |
\ !!A B. F : A ensures B ==> P(A, B); \
|
|
230 |
\ !!A B C. [| F: A leadsTo B; P(A, B); \
|
|
231 |
\ F: B leadsTo C; P(B, C) |] \
|
|
232 |
\ ==> P(A, C); \
|
|
233 |
\ !!B S. [| ALL A:S. F:A leadsTo B & P(A, B); B:condition |] \
|
|
234 |
\ ==> P(Union(S), B) \
|
|
235 |
\ |] ==> P(za, zb)";
|
|
236 |
by (cut_facts_tac [major] 1);
|
|
237 |
by (rtac (major RS CollectD2 RS leads.induct) 1);
|
|
238 |
by (auto_tac (claset() addIs prems, simpset()));
|
|
239 |
qed "leadsTo_induct";
|
|
240 |
|
|
241 |
Goal
|
|
242 |
"[| A<=B; F:program; B:condition |] \
|
|
243 |
\ ==> F : A ensures B";
|
|
244 |
by (rewrite_goals_tac [ensures_def, constrains_def,
|
|
245 |
transient_def, condition_def]);
|
|
246 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
247 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
248 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "Id")] bexI 5);
|
|
249 |
by (REPEAT(blast_tac (claset() addDs [Id_in_Acts]) 1));
|
|
250 |
qed "subset_imp_ensures";
|
|
251 |
|
|
252 |
bind_thm ("subset_imp_leadsTo", subset_imp_ensures RS leadsTo_Basis);
|
|
253 |
bind_thm ("leadsTo_refl", subset_refl RS subset_imp_leadsTo);
|
|
254 |
|
|
255 |
bind_thm ("empty_leadsTo", empty_subsetI RS subset_imp_leadsTo);
|
|
256 |
|
|
257 |
Addsimps [empty_leadsTo];
|
|
258 |
|
|
259 |
Goalw [condition_def]
|
|
260 |
"[| F:program; A:condition |] ==> F: A leadsTo state";
|
|
261 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [subset_imp_leadsTo]) 1);
|
|
262 |
qed "leadsTo_state";
|
|
263 |
Addsimps [leadsTo_state];
|
|
264 |
|
|
265 |
(* A nicer induction rule; without ensures *)
|
|
266 |
val [major,impl,basis,trans,unionp] = Goal
|
|
267 |
"[| F: za leadsTo zb; \
|
|
268 |
\ !!A B. [| A<=B; B:condition |] ==> P(A, B); \
|
|
269 |
\ !!A B. [| F:A co A Un B; F:transient(A) |] ==> P(A, B); \
|
|
270 |
\ !!A B C. [| F: A leadsTo B; P(A, B); \
|
|
271 |
\ F: B leadsTo C; P(B, C) |] \
|
|
272 |
\ ==> P(A, C); \
|
|
273 |
\ !!B S. [| ALL A:S. F:A leadsTo B & P(A, B); B:condition |] \
|
|
274 |
\ ==> P(Union(S), B) \
|
|
275 |
\ |] ==> P(za, zb)";
|
|
276 |
by (cut_facts_tac [major] 1);
|
|
277 |
by (etac leadsTo_induct 1);
|
|
278 |
by (auto_tac (claset() addIs [trans,unionp], simpset()));
|
|
279 |
by (rewrite_goal_tac [ensures_def] 1);
|
|
280 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
281 |
by (forward_tac [constrainsD2] 1);
|
|
282 |
by (dres_inst_tac [("B'", "(A-B) Un B")] constrains_weaken_R 1);
|
|
283 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
284 |
by (forward_tac [ensuresI2 RS leadsTo_Basis] 1);
|
|
285 |
by (dtac basis 2);
|
|
286 |
by (subgoal_tac "A Int B <= B " 3);
|
|
287 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
288 |
by (dtac impl 1);
|
|
289 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
290 |
by (res_inst_tac [("a", "Union({A - B, A Int B})"), ("P", "%x. P(x, ?u)")] subst 1);
|
|
291 |
by (rtac unionp 2);
|
|
292 |
by (auto_tac (claset() addIs [subset_imp_leadsTo], simpset()));
|
|
293 |
qed "leadsTo_induct2";
|
|
294 |
|
|
295 |
|
|
296 |
|
|
297 |
(** Variant induction rule: on the preconditions for B **)
|
|
298 |
(*Lemma is the weak version: can't see how to do it in one step*)
|
|
299 |
val major::prems = Goal
|
|
300 |
"[| F : za leadsTo zb; \
|
|
301 |
\ P(zb); \
|
|
302 |
\ !!A B. [| F : A ensures B; P(B) |] ==> P(A); \
|
|
303 |
\ !!S. [| ALL A:S. P(A) |] ==> P(Union(S)) \
|
|
304 |
\ |] ==> P(za)";
|
|
305 |
(*by induction on this formula*)
|
|
306 |
by (subgoal_tac "P(zb) --> P(za)" 1);
|
|
307 |
(*now solve first subgoal: this formula is sufficient*)
|
|
308 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs leadsTo_refl::prems) 1);
|
|
309 |
by (rtac (major RS leadsTo_induct) 1);
|
|
310 |
by (REPEAT (blast_tac (claset() addIs prems) 1));
|
|
311 |
qed "lemma";
|
|
312 |
|
|
313 |
|
|
314 |
val [major, cond, ensuresp, unionp] = Goal
|
|
315 |
"[| F : za leadsTo zb; \
|
|
316 |
\ P(zb); \
|
|
317 |
\ !!A B. [| F : A ensures B; F : B leadsTo zb; P(B) |] ==> P(A); \
|
|
318 |
\ !!S. ALL A:S. F : A leadsTo zb & P(A) ==> P(Union(S)) \
|
|
319 |
\ |] ==> P(za)";
|
|
320 |
by (cut_facts_tac [major] 1);
|
|
321 |
by (subgoal_tac "(F : za leadsTo zb) & P(za)" 1);
|
|
322 |
by (etac conjunct2 1);
|
|
323 |
by (rtac (major RS lemma) 1);
|
|
324 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD]
|
|
325 |
addIs [leadsTo_Union,unionp]) 3);
|
|
326 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Trans,ensuresp]) 2);
|
|
327 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [conjI,leadsTo_refl,cond]
|
|
328 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
329 |
qed "leadsTo_induct_pre";
|
|
330 |
|
|
331 |
|
|
332 |
Goal
|
|
333 |
"[| F : A leadsTo A'; A'<=B'; B':condition |]\
|
|
334 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo B'";
|
|
335 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [subset_imp_leadsTo,
|
|
336 |
leadsTo_Trans]
|
|
337 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
338 |
qed "leadsTo_weaken_R";
|
|
339 |
|
|
340 |
|
|
341 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo A'; B<=A |] ==> F : B leadsTo A'";
|
|
342 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
343 |
addIs [leadsTo_Trans, subset_imp_leadsTo]
|
|
344 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
345 |
qed_spec_mp "leadsTo_weaken_L";
|
|
346 |
|
|
347 |
(*Distributes over binary unions*)
|
|
348 |
Goal "F:(A Un B) leadsTo C <-> (F:A leadsTo C & F : B leadsTo C)";
|
|
349 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Un, leadsTo_weaken_L]) 1);
|
|
350 |
qed "leadsTo_Un_distrib";
|
|
351 |
|
|
352 |
Goal "[| F:program; B:condition |] \
|
|
353 |
\==> F : (UN i:I. A(i)) leadsTo B <-> (ALL i : I. F : (A(i)) leadsTo B)";
|
|
354 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_UN, leadsTo_weaken_L]) 1);
|
|
355 |
qed "leadsTo_UN_distrib";
|
|
356 |
|
|
357 |
Goal "[| F:program; B:condition |] \
|
|
358 |
\==> F : (Union(S)) leadsTo B <-> (ALL A:S. F : A leadsTo B)";
|
|
359 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Union, leadsTo_weaken_L]) 1);
|
|
360 |
qed "leadsTo_Union_distrib";
|
|
361 |
|
|
362 |
Goal
|
|
363 |
"[| F : A leadsTo A'; B<=A; A'<=B'; B':condition |] \
|
|
364 |
\ ==> F : B leadsTo B'";
|
|
365 |
by (subgoal_tac "B:condition & A':condition" 1);
|
|
366 |
by (force_tac (claset() addSDs [leadsToD],
|
|
367 |
simpset() addsimps [condition_def]) 2);
|
|
368 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
369 |
addIs [leadsTo_weaken_R, leadsTo_weaken_L, leadsTo_Trans]) 1);
|
|
370 |
qed "leadsTo_weaken";
|
|
371 |
|
|
372 |
(*Set difference: maybe combine with leadsTo_weaken_L?*)
|
|
373 |
Goal "[| F : (A-B) leadsTo C; F : B leadsTo C|] ==> F : A leadsTo C";
|
|
374 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Un, leadsTo_weaken]
|
|
375 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
376 |
qed "leadsTo_Diff";
|
|
377 |
|
|
378 |
|
|
379 |
Goal "[| ALL i:I. F : (A(i)) leadsTo (A'(i)); F:program |] \
|
|
380 |
\ ==> F:(UN i:I. A(i)) leadsTo (UN i:I. A'(i))";
|
|
381 |
by (rtac leadsTo_Union 1);
|
|
382 |
by (ALLGOALS(Clarify_tac));
|
|
383 |
by (REPEAT(blast_tac (claset()
|
|
384 |
addIs [leadsTo_weaken_R] addDs [leadsToD]) 1));
|
|
385 |
qed "leadsTo_UN_UN";
|
|
386 |
|
|
387 |
(*Binary union version*)
|
|
388 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : B leadsTo B' |] \
|
|
389 |
\ ==> F : (A Un B) leadsTo (A' Un B')";
|
|
390 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Un, leadsTo_weaken_R]
|
|
391 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
392 |
qed "leadsTo_Un_Un";
|
|
393 |
|
|
394 |
|
|
395 |
(** The cancellation law **)
|
|
396 |
|
|
397 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo (A' Un B); F : B leadsTo B' |] \
|
|
398 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo (A' Un B')";
|
|
399 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
400 |
addIs [leadsTo_Trans, leadsTo_Un_Un, leadsTo_refl]
|
|
401 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
402 |
qed "leadsTo_cancel2";
|
|
403 |
|
|
404 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo (A' Un B); F : (B-A') leadsTo B' |] \
|
|
405 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo (A' Un B')";
|
|
406 |
by (rtac leadsTo_cancel2 1);
|
|
407 |
by (assume_tac 2);
|
|
408 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_weaken_R]
|
|
409 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
410 |
qed "leadsTo_cancel_Diff2";
|
|
411 |
|
|
412 |
|
|
413 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo (B Un A'); F : B leadsTo B' |] \
|
|
414 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo (B' Un A')";
|
|
415 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Un_commute]) 1);
|
|
416 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [leadsTo_cancel2]) 1);
|
|
417 |
qed "leadsTo_cancel1";
|
|
418 |
|
|
419 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo (B Un A'); F : (B-A') leadsTo B' |] \
|
|
420 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo (B' Un A')";
|
|
421 |
by (rtac leadsTo_cancel1 1);
|
|
422 |
by (assume_tac 2);
|
|
423 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
424 |
addIs [leadsTo_weaken_R]
|
|
425 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
426 |
qed "leadsTo_cancel_Diff1";
|
|
427 |
|
|
428 |
(** The impossibility law **)
|
|
429 |
|
|
430 |
Goal
|
|
431 |
"F : A leadsTo 0 ==> A=0";
|
|
432 |
by (etac leadsTo_induct_pre 1);
|
|
433 |
by (rewrite_goals_tac
|
|
434 |
[ensures_def, constrains_def, transient_def]);
|
|
435 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
436 |
by (auto_tac (claset() addSDs [Acts_type],
|
|
437 |
simpset() addsimps
|
|
438 |
[actionSet_def, condition_def]));
|
|
439 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [bspec]) 1);
|
|
440 |
qed "leadsTo_empty";
|
|
441 |
|
|
442 |
|
|
443 |
|
|
444 |
(** PSP: Progress-Safety-Progress **)
|
|
445 |
|
|
446 |
(*Special case of PSP: Misra's "stable conjunction"*)
|
|
447 |
Goalw [stable_def]
|
|
448 |
"[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : stable(B) |] ==> \
|
|
449 |
\ F:(A Int B) leadsTo (A' Int B)";
|
|
450 |
by (etac leadsTo_induct 1);
|
|
451 |
by (rtac leadsTo_Union_Int 3);
|
|
452 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Union_Int]) 3);
|
|
453 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Trans]) 2);
|
|
454 |
by (rtac leadsTo_Basis 1);
|
|
455 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset()
|
|
456 |
addsimps [ensures_def, Diff_Int_distrib RS sym,
|
|
457 |
Diff_Int_distrib2 RS sym, Int_Un_distrib RS sym]) 1);
|
|
458 |
by (REPEAT(blast_tac (claset()
|
|
459 |
addIs [transient_strengthen,constrains_Int]
|
|
460 |
addDs [constrainsD2]) 1));
|
|
461 |
qed "psp_stable";
|
|
462 |
|
|
463 |
|
|
464 |
Goal
|
|
465 |
"[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : stable(B) |] \
|
|
466 |
\ ==> F : (B Int A) leadsTo (B Int A')";
|
|
467 |
by (asm_simp_tac (simpset()
|
|
468 |
addsimps psp_stable::Int_ac) 1);
|
|
469 |
qed "psp_stable2";
|
|
470 |
|
|
471 |
|
|
472 |
Goalw [ensures_def, constrains_def]
|
|
473 |
"[| F : A ensures A'; F : B co B' |] \
|
|
474 |
\ ==> F : (A Int B') ensures ((A' Int B) Un (B' - B))";
|
|
475 |
(*speeds up the proof*)
|
|
476 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
477 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [transient_strengthen]) 1);
|
|
478 |
qed "psp_ensures";
|
|
479 |
|
|
480 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : B co B' |] \
|
|
481 |
\ ==> F : (A Int B') leadsTo ((A' Int B) Un (B' - B))";
|
|
482 |
by (subgoal_tac "F:program & A:condition & \
|
|
483 |
\ A':condition & B:condition & B':condition" 1);
|
|
484 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 2);
|
|
485 |
by (etac leadsTo_induct 1);
|
|
486 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Union_Int]) 3);
|
|
487 |
(*Transitivity case has a delicate argument involving "cancellation"*)
|
|
488 |
by (rtac leadsTo_Un_duplicate2 2);
|
|
489 |
by (etac leadsTo_cancel_Diff1 2);
|
|
490 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Int_Diff, Diff_triv]) 2);
|
|
491 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_weaken_L]
|
|
492 |
addDs [constrains_imp_subset]) 2);
|
|
493 |
(*Basis case*)
|
|
494 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [psp_ensures]) 1);
|
|
495 |
qed "psp";
|
|
496 |
|
|
497 |
|
|
498 |
Goal "[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : B co B' |] \
|
|
499 |
\ ==> F : (B' Int A) leadsTo ((B Int A') Un (B' - B))";
|
|
500 |
by (asm_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps psp::Int_ac) 1);
|
|
501 |
qed "psp2";
|
|
502 |
|
|
503 |
|
|
504 |
|
|
505 |
Goalw [unless_def]
|
|
506 |
"[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : B unless B' |] \
|
|
507 |
\ ==> F : (A Int B) leadsTo ((A' Int B) Un B')";
|
|
508 |
by (subgoal_tac "F:program & A:condition & A':condition &\
|
|
509 |
\ B:condition & B':condition" 1);
|
|
510 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 2);
|
|
511 |
by (dtac psp 1);
|
|
512 |
by (assume_tac 1);
|
|
513 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_weaken]) 1);
|
|
514 |
qed "psp_unless";
|
|
515 |
|
|
516 |
(*** Proving the induction rules ***)
|
|
517 |
(** The most general rule: r is any wf relation; f is any variant function **)
|
|
518 |
Goal "[| wf(r); \
|
|
519 |
\ m:I; \
|
|
520 |
\ field(r)<=I; \
|
|
521 |
\ F:program; B:condition;\
|
|
522 |
\ ALL m:I. F : (A Int f-``{m}) leadsTo \
|
|
523 |
\ ((A Int f-``(converse(r)``{m})) Un B) |] \
|
|
524 |
\ ==> F : (A Int f-``{m}) leadsTo B";
|
|
525 |
by (eres_inst_tac [("a","m")] wf_induct2 1);
|
|
526 |
by (ALLGOALS(Asm_simp_tac));
|
|
527 |
by (subgoal_tac "F : (A Int (f-``(converse(r)``{x}))) leadsTo B" 1);
|
|
528 |
by (stac vimage_eq_UN 2);
|
|
529 |
by (asm_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Int_UN_distrib]) 2);
|
|
530 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_cancel1, leadsTo_Un_duplicate]) 1);
|
|
531 |
by (case_tac "converse(r)``{x}=0" 1);
|
|
532 |
by (auto_tac (claset() addSEs [not_emptyE] addSIs [leadsTo_UN], simpset()));
|
|
533 |
qed "lemma1";
|
|
534 |
|
|
535 |
(** Meta or object quantifier ? **)
|
|
536 |
Goal "[| wf(r); \
|
|
537 |
\ field(r)<=I; \
|
|
538 |
\ A<=f-``I;\
|
|
539 |
\ F:program; A:condition; B:condition; \
|
|
540 |
\ ALL m:I. F : (A Int f-``{m}) leadsTo \
|
|
541 |
\ ((A Int f-``(converse(r)``{m})) Un B) |] \
|
|
542 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo B";
|
|
543 |
by (res_inst_tac [("b", "A")] subst 1);
|
|
544 |
by (res_inst_tac [("I", "I")] leadsTo_UN 2);
|
|
545 |
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 2));
|
|
546 |
by (Clarify_tac 2);
|
|
547 |
by (eres_inst_tac [("I", "I")] lemma1 2);
|
|
548 |
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 2));
|
|
549 |
by (rtac equalityI 1);
|
|
550 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
551 |
by (thin_tac "field(r)<=I" 1);
|
|
552 |
by (dres_inst_tac [("c", "x")] subsetD 1);
|
|
553 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
554 |
by (res_inst_tac [("b", "x")] UN_I 1);
|
|
555 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
556 |
qed "leadsTo_wf_induct";
|
|
557 |
|
|
558 |
Goalw [field_def] "field(less_than(nat)) = nat";
|
|
559 |
by (simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [less_than_equals]) 1);
|
|
560 |
by (rtac equalityI 1);
|
|
561 |
by (force_tac (claset() addSEs [rangeE], simpset()) 1);
|
|
562 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
563 |
by (thin_tac "x~:range(?y)" 1);
|
|
564 |
by (etac nat_induct 1);
|
|
565 |
by (ALLGOALS(asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [domain_def])));
|
|
566 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "<succ(xa),succ(succ(xa))>")] ReplaceI 2);
|
|
567 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "<0,1>")] ReplaceI 1);
|
|
568 |
by (REPEAT(force_tac (claset() addIs [splitI], simpset()) 1));
|
|
569 |
qed "nat_less_than_field";
|
|
570 |
|
|
571 |
(*Alternative proof is via the lemma F : (A Int f-`(lessThan m)) leadsTo B*)
|
|
572 |
Goal
|
|
573 |
"[| A<=f-``nat;\
|
|
574 |
\ F:program; A:condition; B:condition; \
|
|
575 |
\ ALL m:nat. F:(A Int f-``{m}) leadsTo ((A Int f-``lessThan(m,nat)) Un B) |] \
|
|
576 |
\ ==> F : A leadsTo B";
|
|
577 |
by (res_inst_tac [("A1", "nat")]
|
|
578 |
(wf_less_than RS leadsTo_wf_induct) 1);
|
|
579 |
by (Clarify_tac 6);
|
|
580 |
by (ALLGOALS(asm_full_simp_tac
|
|
581 |
(simpset() addsimps [nat_less_than_field])));
|
|
582 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
583 |
by (ALLGOALS(asm_full_simp_tac
|
|
584 |
(simpset() addsimps [rewrite_rule [vimage_def] Image_inverse_less_than])));
|
|
585 |
qed "lessThan_induct";
|
|
586 |
|
|
587 |
|
|
588 |
(*** wlt ****)
|
|
589 |
|
|
590 |
(*Misra's property W3*)
|
|
591 |
Goalw [wlt_def]
|
|
592 |
"[| F:program; B:condition |] ==> F:wlt(F, B) leadsTo B";
|
|
593 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [leadsTo_Union]) 1);
|
|
594 |
qed "wlt_leadsTo";
|
|
595 |
|
|
596 |
Goalw [wlt_def] "F : A leadsTo B ==> A <= wlt(F, B)";
|
|
597 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [leadsTo_Union]
|
|
598 |
addDs [leadsToD]) 1);
|
|
599 |
qed "leadsTo_subset";
|
|
600 |
|
|
601 |
(*Misra's property W2*)
|
|
602 |
Goal "[| F:program; B:condition |] ==> \
|
|
603 |
\ F : A leadsTo B <-> (A <= wlt(F,B))";
|
|
604 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
605 |
addSIs [leadsTo_subset, wlt_leadsTo RS leadsTo_weaken_L]) 1);
|
|
606 |
qed "leadsTo_eq_subset_wlt";
|
|
607 |
|
|
608 |
(*Misra's property W4*)
|
|
609 |
Goal "[| F:program; B:condition |] ==> B <= wlt(F,B)";
|
|
610 |
by (asm_simp_tac (simpset()
|
|
611 |
addsimps [leadsTo_eq_subset_wlt RS iff_sym,
|
|
612 |
subset_imp_leadsTo]) 1);
|
|
613 |
qed "wlt_increasing";
|
|
614 |
|
|
615 |
(*Used in the Trans case below*)
|
|
616 |
Goalw [constrains_def]
|
|
617 |
"[| B <= A2; \
|
|
618 |
\ F : (A1 - B) co (A1 Un B); \
|
|
619 |
\ F : (A2 - C) co (A2 Un C) |] \
|
|
620 |
\ ==> F : (A1 Un A2 - C) co (A1 Un A2 Un C)";
|
|
621 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
622 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
623 |
qed "lemma1";
|
|
624 |
|
|
625 |
|
|
626 |
|
|
627 |
(*Lemma (1,2,3) of Misra's draft book, Chapter 4, "Progress"*)
|
|
628 |
(* slightly different from the HOL one: B here is bounded *)
|
|
629 |
Goal "F : A leadsTo A' \
|
|
630 |
\ ==> EX B:condition. A<=B & F:B leadsTo A' & F : (B-A') co (B Un A')";
|
|
631 |
by (forward_tac [leadsToD] 1);
|
|
632 |
by (etac leadsTo_induct 1);
|
|
633 |
(*Basis*)
|
|
634 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [ensuresD, constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
635 |
(*Trans*)
|
|
636 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
637 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "Ba Un Bb")] bexI 1);
|
|
638 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [lemma1,leadsTo_Un_Un, leadsTo_cancel1,
|
|
639 |
leadsTo_Un_duplicate]) 1);
|
|
640 |
by (Blast_tac 1);
|
|
641 |
(*Union*)
|
|
642 |
by (clarify_tac (claset() addSDs [ball_conj_distrib RS iffD1]) 1);
|
|
643 |
by (subgoal_tac "EX y. y:Pi(S, %A. {Ba:condition. A<=Ba & \
|
|
644 |
\ F:Ba leadsTo B & F:Ba - B co Ba Un B})" 1);
|
|
645 |
by (rtac AC_ball_Pi 2);
|
|
646 |
by (Clarify_tac 2);
|
|
647 |
by (rotate_tac 3 2);
|
|
648 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [bspec]) 2);
|
|
649 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
650 |
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "UN A:S. y`A")] bexI 1);
|
|
651 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
652 |
by (res_inst_tac [("I1", "S")] (constrains_UN RS constrains_weaken) 3);
|
|
653 |
by (rtac leadsTo_Union 2);
|
|
654 |
by Safe_tac;
|
|
655 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [condition_def]) 7);
|
|
656 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [condition_def]) 6);
|
|
657 |
by (REPEAT(blast_tac (claset() addDs [apply_type]) 1));
|
|
658 |
qed "leadsTo_123";
|
|
659 |
|
|
660 |
|
|
661 |
(*Misra's property W5*)
|
|
662 |
Goal "[| F:program; B:condition |] ==>F : (wlt(F, B) - B) co (wlt(F,B))";
|
|
663 |
by (cut_inst_tac [("F","F")] (wlt_leadsTo RS leadsTo_123) 1);
|
|
664 |
by (assume_tac 1);
|
|
665 |
by (assume_tac 1);
|
|
666 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
667 |
by (subgoal_tac "Ba = wlt(F,B)" 1);
|
|
668 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsTo_eq_subset_wlt RS iffD1]) 2);
|
|
669 |
by (Clarify_tac 1);
|
|
670 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset()
|
|
671 |
addsimps [wlt_increasing RS (subset_Un_iff2 RS iffD1)]) 1);
|
|
672 |
qed "wlt_constrains_wlt";
|
|
673 |
|
|
674 |
Goalw [wlt_def, condition_def]
|
|
675 |
"wlt(F,B):condition";
|
|
676 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
677 |
qed "wlt_in_condition";
|
|
678 |
|
|
679 |
(*** Completion: Binary and General Finite versions ***)
|
|
680 |
|
|
681 |
Goal "[| W = wlt(F, (B' Un C)); \
|
|
682 |
\ F : A leadsTo (A' Un C); F : A' co (A' Un C); \
|
|
683 |
\ F : B leadsTo (B' Un C); F : B' co (B' Un C) |] \
|
|
684 |
\ ==> F : (A Int B) leadsTo ((A' Int B') Un C)";
|
|
685 |
by (subgoal_tac "W:condition" 1);
|
|
686 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [wlt_in_condition]) 2);
|
|
687 |
by (subgoal_tac "F : (W-C) co (W Un B' Un C)" 1);
|
|
688 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [[asm_rl, wlt_constrains_wlt]
|
|
689 |
MRS constrains_Un RS constrains_weaken]
|
|
690 |
addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 2);
|
|
691 |
by (subgoal_tac "F : (W-C) co W" 1);
|
|
692 |
by (subgoals_tac ["F:program", "(B' Un C):condition"] 2);
|
|
693 |
by (rotate_tac ~2 2);
|
|
694 |
by (asm_full_simp_tac
|
|
695 |
(simpset() addsimps
|
|
696 |
[wlt_increasing RS (subset_Un_iff2 RS iffD1), Un_assoc]) 2);
|
|
697 |
by (REPEAT(blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD]) 2));
|
|
698 |
by (subgoal_tac "F : (A Int W - C) leadsTo (A' Int W Un C)" 1);
|
|
699 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [wlt_leadsTo, psp RS leadsTo_weaken]
|
|
700 |
addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 2);
|
|
701 |
(** LEVEL 6 **)
|
|
702 |
by (subgoal_tac "F : (A' Int W Un C) leadsTo (A' Int B' Un C)" 1);
|
|
703 |
by (subgoal_tac "A' Int W Un C:condition & A' Int B' Un C:condition" 2);
|
|
704 |
by (rtac leadsTo_Un_duplicate2 2);
|
|
705 |
by (blast_tac (claset()
|
|
706 |
addIs [leadsTo_Un_Un, wlt_leadsTo RS
|
|
707 |
psp2 RS leadsTo_weaken,leadsTo_refl]
|
|
708 |
addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD]) 2);
|
|
709 |
by (thin_tac "W=wlt(F, B' Un C)" 2);
|
|
710 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 2);
|
|
711 |
by (dtac leadsTo_Diff 1);
|
|
712 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [subset_imp_leadsTo]
|
|
713 |
addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
714 |
by (subgoal_tac "A Int B <= A Int W" 1);
|
|
715 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [leadsTo_subset]
|
|
716 |
addSIs [subset_refl RS Int_mono]) 2);
|
|
717 |
(** To speed the proof **)
|
|
718 |
by (subgoal_tac "A Int B :condition & A \
|
|
719 |
\ Int W :condition & A' Int B' Un C:condition" 1);
|
|
720 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [leadsTo_Trans, subset_imp_leadsTo]
|
|
721 |
addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
722 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 1);
|
|
723 |
bind_thm("completion", refl RS result());
|
|
724 |
|
|
725 |
Goal "[| I:Fin(X); F:program; C:condition |] ==> \
|
|
726 |
\(ALL i:I. F : (A(i)) leadsTo (A'(i) Un C)) --> \
|
|
727 |
\ (ALL i:I. F : (A'(i)) co (A'(i) Un C)) --> \
|
|
728 |
\ F : (INT i:I. A(i)) leadsTo ((INT i:I. A'(i)) Un C)";
|
|
729 |
by (etac Fin_induct 1);
|
|
730 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
731 |
by (case_tac "y=0" 1);
|
|
732 |
by Auto_tac;
|
|
733 |
by (etac not_emptyE 1);
|
|
734 |
by (subgoal_tac "Inter(cons(A(x), RepFun(y, A)))= A(x) Int Inter(RepFun(y,A)) & \
|
|
735 |
\ Inter(cons(A'(x), RepFun(y, A')))= A'(x) Int Inter(RepFun(y,A'))" 1);
|
|
736 |
by (Blast_tac 2);
|
|
737 |
by (Asm_simp_tac 1);
|
|
738 |
by (rtac completion 1);
|
|
739 |
by (subgoal_tac "Inter(RepFun(y, A')) Un C = (INT x:RepFun(y, A'). x Un C)" 4);
|
|
740 |
by (Blast_tac 5);
|
|
741 |
by (Asm_simp_tac 4);
|
|
742 |
by (rtac constrains_INT 4);
|
|
743 |
by (REPEAT(Blast_tac 1));
|
|
744 |
qed "lemma";
|
|
745 |
|
|
746 |
val prems = Goal
|
|
747 |
"[| I:Fin(X); \
|
|
748 |
\ !!i. i:I ==> F : A(i) leadsTo (A'(i) Un C); \
|
|
749 |
\ !!i. i:I ==> F : A'(i) co (A'(i) Un C); F:program; C:condition |] \
|
|
750 |
\ ==> F : (INT i:I. A(i)) leadsTo ((INT i:I. A'(i)) Un C)";
|
|
751 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs (lemma RS mp RS mp)::prems) 1);
|
|
752 |
qed "finite_completion";
|
|
753 |
|
|
754 |
Goalw [stable_def]
|
|
755 |
"[| F : A leadsTo A'; F : stable(A'); \
|
|
756 |
\ F : B leadsTo B'; F : stable(B') |] \
|
|
757 |
\ ==> F : (A Int B) leadsTo (A' Int B')";
|
|
758 |
by (res_inst_tac [("C1", "0")] (completion RS leadsTo_weaken_R) 1);
|
|
759 |
by (REPEAT(blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 5));
|
|
760 |
by (ALLGOALS(Asm_full_simp_tac));
|
|
761 |
qed "stable_completion";
|
|
762 |
|
|
763 |
|
|
764 |
val prems = Goalw [stable_def]
|
|
765 |
"[| I:Fin(X); \
|
|
766 |
\ ALL i:I. F : A(i) leadsTo A'(i); \
|
|
767 |
\ ALL i:I. F: stable(A'(i)); F:program |] \
|
|
768 |
\ ==> F : (INT i:I. A(i)) leadsTo (INT i:I. A'(i))";
|
|
769 |
by (subgoal_tac "(INT i:I. A'(i)):condition" 1);
|
|
770 |
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [leadsToD, constrainsD2]) 2);
|
|
771 |
by (res_inst_tac [("C1", "0")] (finite_completion RS leadsTo_weaken_R) 1);
|
|
772 |
by (assume_tac 7);
|
|
773 |
by (ALLGOALS(Asm_full_simp_tac));
|
|
774 |
by (ALLGOALS (Blast_tac));
|
|
775 |
qed "finite_stable_completion";
|
|
776 |
|