src/HOL/Cardinals/Order_Union.thy

misc tuning and modernization;

(*  Title:      HOL/Cardinals/Order_Union.thy
    Author:     Andrei Popescu, TU Muenchen

The ordinal-like sum of two orders with disjoint fields
*)

section \<open>Order Union\<close>

theory Order_Union
imports Order_Relation
begin

definition Osum :: "'a rel \<Rightarrow> 'a rel \<Rightarrow> 'a rel"  (infix "Osum" 60) where
  "r Osum r' = r \<union> r' \<union> {(a, a'). a \<in> Field r \<and> a' \<in> Field r'}"

notation Osum  (infix "\<union>o" 60)

lemma Field_Osum: "Field (r \<union>o r') = Field r \<union> Field r'"
  unfolding Osum_def Field_def by blast

lemma Osum_wf:
assumes FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        WF: "wf r" and WF': "wf r'"
shows "wf (r Osum r')"
unfolding wf_eq_minimal2 unfolding Field_Osum
proof(intro allI impI, elim conjE)
  fix A assume *: "A \<subseteq> Field r \<union> Field r'" and **: "A \<noteq> {}"
  obtain B where B_def: "B = A Int Field r" by blast
  show "\<exists>a\<in>A. \<forall>a'\<in>A. (a', a) \<notin> r \<union>o r'"
  proof(cases "B = {}")
    assume Case1: "B \<noteq> {}"
    hence "B \<noteq> {} \<and> B \<le> Field r" using B_def by auto
    then obtain a where 1: "a \<in> B" and 2: "\<forall>a1 \<in> B. (a1,a) \<notin> r"
    using WF unfolding wf_eq_minimal2 by blast
    hence 3: "a \<in> Field r \<and> a \<notin> Field r'" using B_def FLD by auto
    (*  *)
    have "\<forall>a1 \<in> A. (a1,a) \<notin> r Osum r'"
    proof(intro ballI)
      fix a1 assume **: "a1 \<in> A"
      {assume Case11: "a1 \<in> Field r"
       hence "(a1,a) \<notin> r" using B_def ** 2 by auto
       moreover
       have "(a1,a) \<notin> r'" using 3 by (auto simp add: Field_def)
       ultimately have "(a1,a) \<notin> r Osum r'"
       using 3 unfolding Osum_def by auto
      }
      moreover
      {assume Case12: "a1 \<notin> Field r"
       hence "(a1,a) \<notin> r" unfolding Field_def by auto
       moreover
       have "(a1,a) \<notin> r'" using 3 unfolding Field_def by auto
       ultimately have "(a1,a) \<notin> r Osum r'"
       using 3 unfolding Osum_def by auto
      }
      ultimately show "(a1,a) \<notin> r Osum r'" by blast
    qed
    thus ?thesis using 1 B_def by auto
  next
    assume Case2: "B = {}"
    hence 1: "A \<noteq> {} \<and> A \<le> Field r'" using * ** B_def by auto
    then obtain a' where 2: "a' \<in> A" and 3: "\<forall>a1' \<in> A. (a1',a') \<notin> r'"
    using WF' unfolding wf_eq_minimal2 by blast
    hence 4: "a' \<in> Field r' \<and> a' \<notin> Field r" using 1 FLD by blast
    (*  *)
    have "\<forall>a1' \<in> A. (a1',a') \<notin> r Osum r'"
    proof(unfold Osum_def, auto simp add: 3)
      fix a1' assume "(a1', a') \<in> r"
      thus False using 4 unfolding Field_def by blast
    next
      fix a1' assume "a1' \<in> A" and "a1' \<in> Field r"
      thus False using Case2 B_def by auto
    qed
    thus ?thesis using 2 by blast
  qed
qed

lemma Osum_Refl:
assumes FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        REFL: "Refl r" and REFL': "Refl r'"
shows "Refl (r Osum r')"
using assms
unfolding refl_on_def Field_Osum unfolding Osum_def by blast

lemma Osum_trans:
assumes FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        TRANS: "trans r" and TRANS': "trans r'"
shows "trans (r Osum r')"
proof(unfold trans_def, auto)
  fix x y z assume *: "(x, y) \<in> r \<union>o r'" and **: "(y, z) \<in> r \<union>o r'"
  show  "(x, z) \<in> r \<union>o r'"
  proof-
    {assume Case1: "(x,y) \<in> r"
     hence 1: "x \<in> Field r \<and> y \<in> Field r" unfolding Field_def by auto
     have ?thesis
     proof-
       {assume Case11: "(y,z) \<in> r"
        hence "(x,z) \<in> r" using Case1 TRANS trans_def[of r] by blast
        hence ?thesis unfolding Osum_def by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case12: "(y,z) \<in> r'"
        hence "y \<in> Field r'" unfolding Field_def by auto
        hence False using FLD 1 by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case13: "z \<in> Field r'"
        hence ?thesis using 1 unfolding Osum_def by auto
       }
       ultimately show ?thesis using ** unfolding Osum_def by blast
     qed
    }
    moreover
    {assume Case2: "(x,y) \<in> r'"
     hence 2: "x \<in> Field r' \<and> y \<in> Field r'" unfolding Field_def by auto
     have ?thesis
     proof-
       {assume Case21: "(y,z) \<in> r"
        hence "y \<in> Field r" unfolding Field_def by auto
        hence False using FLD 2 by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case22: "(y,z) \<in> r'"
        hence "(x,z) \<in> r'" using Case2 TRANS' trans_def[of r'] by blast
        hence ?thesis unfolding Osum_def by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case23: "y \<in> Field r"
        hence False using FLD 2 by auto
       }
       ultimately show ?thesis using ** unfolding Osum_def by blast
     qed
    }
    moreover
    {assume Case3: "x \<in> Field r \<and> y \<in> Field r'"
     have ?thesis
     proof-
       {assume Case31: "(y,z) \<in> r"
        hence "y \<in> Field r" unfolding Field_def by auto
        hence False using FLD Case3 by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case32: "(y,z) \<in> r'"
        hence "z \<in> Field r'" unfolding Field_def by blast
        hence ?thesis unfolding Osum_def using Case3 by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case33: "y \<in> Field r"
        hence False using FLD Case3 by auto
       }
       ultimately show ?thesis using ** unfolding Osum_def by blast
     qed
    }
    ultimately show ?thesis using * unfolding Osum_def by blast
  qed
qed

lemma Osum_Preorder:
"\<lbrakk>Field r Int Field r' = {}; Preorder r; Preorder r'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Preorder (r Osum r')"
unfolding preorder_on_def using Osum_Refl Osum_trans by blast

lemma Osum_antisym:
assumes FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        AN: "antisym r" and AN': "antisym r'"
shows "antisym (r Osum r')"
proof(unfold antisym_def, auto)
  fix x y assume *: "(x, y) \<in> r \<union>o r'" and **: "(y, x) \<in> r \<union>o r'"
  show  "x = y"
  proof-
    {assume Case1: "(x,y) \<in> r"
     hence 1: "x \<in> Field r \<and> y \<in> Field r" unfolding Field_def by auto
     have ?thesis
     proof-
       have "(y,x) \<in> r \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
       using Case1 AN antisym_def[of r] by blast
       moreover
       {assume "(y,x) \<in> r'"
        hence "y \<in> Field r'" unfolding Field_def by auto
        hence False using FLD 1 by auto
       }
       moreover
       have "x \<in> Field r' \<Longrightarrow> False" using FLD 1 by auto
       ultimately show ?thesis using ** unfolding Osum_def by blast
     qed
    }
    moreover
    {assume Case2: "(x,y) \<in> r'"
     hence 2: "x \<in> Field r' \<and> y \<in> Field r'" unfolding Field_def by auto
     have ?thesis
     proof-
       {assume "(y,x) \<in> r"
        hence "y \<in> Field r" unfolding Field_def by auto
        hence False using FLD 2 by auto
       }
       moreover
       have "(y,x) \<in> r' \<Longrightarrow> ?thesis"
       using Case2 AN' antisym_def[of r'] by blast
       moreover
       {assume "y \<in> Field r"
        hence False using FLD 2 by auto
       }
       ultimately show ?thesis using ** unfolding Osum_def by blast
     qed
    }
    moreover
    {assume Case3: "x \<in> Field r \<and> y \<in> Field r'"
     have ?thesis
     proof-
       {assume "(y,x) \<in> r"
        hence "y \<in> Field r" unfolding Field_def by auto
        hence False using FLD Case3 by auto
       }
       moreover
       {assume Case32: "(y,x) \<in> r'"
        hence "x \<in> Field r'" unfolding Field_def by blast
        hence False using FLD Case3 by auto
       }
       moreover
       have "\<not> y \<in> Field r" using FLD Case3 by auto
       ultimately show ?thesis using ** unfolding Osum_def by blast
     qed
    }
    ultimately show ?thesis using * unfolding Osum_def by blast
  qed
qed

lemma Osum_Partial_order:
"\<lbrakk>Field r Int Field r' = {}; Partial_order r; Partial_order r'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
 Partial_order (r Osum r')"
unfolding partial_order_on_def using Osum_Preorder Osum_antisym by blast

lemma Osum_Total:
assumes FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        TOT: "Total r" and TOT': "Total r'"
shows "Total (r Osum r')"
using assms
unfolding total_on_def  Field_Osum unfolding Osum_def by blast

lemma Osum_Linear_order:
"\<lbrakk>Field r Int Field r' = {}; Linear_order r; Linear_order r'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
 Linear_order (r Osum r')"
unfolding linear_order_on_def using Osum_Partial_order Osum_Total by blast

lemma Osum_minus_Id1:
assumes "r \<le> Id"
shows "(r Osum r') - Id \<le> (r' - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r')"
proof-
  let ?Left = "(r Osum r') - Id"
  let ?Right = "(r' - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r')"
  {fix a::'a and b assume *: "(a,b) \<notin> Id"
   {assume "(a,b) \<in> r"
    with * have False using assms by auto
   }
   moreover
   {assume "(a,b) \<in> r'"
    with * have "(a,b) \<in> r' - Id" by auto
   }
   ultimately
   have "(a,b) \<in> ?Left \<Longrightarrow> (a,b) \<in> ?Right"
   unfolding Osum_def by auto
  }
  thus ?thesis by auto
qed

lemma Osum_minus_Id2:
assumes "r' \<le> Id"
shows "(r Osum r') - Id \<le> (r - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r')"
proof-
  let ?Left = "(r Osum r') - Id"
  let ?Right = "(r - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r')"
  {fix a::'a and b assume *: "(a,b) \<notin> Id"
   {assume "(a,b) \<in> r'"
    with * have False using assms by auto
   }
   moreover
   {assume "(a,b) \<in> r"
    with * have "(a,b) \<in> r - Id" by auto
   }
   ultimately
   have "(a,b) \<in> ?Left \<Longrightarrow> (a,b) \<in> ?Right"
   unfolding Osum_def by auto
  }
  thus ?thesis by auto
qed

lemma Osum_minus_Id:
assumes TOT: "Total r" and TOT': "Total r'" and
        NID: "\<not> (r \<le> Id)" and NID': "\<not> (r' \<le> Id)"
shows "(r Osum r') - Id \<le> (r - Id) Osum (r' - Id)"
proof-
  {fix a a' assume *: "(a,a') \<in> (r Osum r')" and **: "a \<noteq> a'"
   have "(a,a') \<in> (r - Id) Osum (r' - Id)"
   proof-
     {assume "(a,a') \<in> r \<or> (a,a') \<in> r'"
      with ** have ?thesis unfolding Osum_def by auto
     }
     moreover
     {assume "a \<in> Field r \<and> a' \<in> Field r'"
      hence "a \<in> Field(r - Id) \<and> a' \<in> Field (r' - Id)"
      using assms Total_Id_Field by blast
      hence ?thesis unfolding Osum_def by auto
     }
     ultimately show ?thesis using * unfolding Osum_def by fast
   qed
  }
  thus ?thesis by(auto simp add: Osum_def)
qed

lemma wf_Int_Times:
assumes "A Int B = {}"
shows "wf(A \<times> B)"
unfolding wf_def using assms by blast

lemma Osum_wf_Id:
assumes TOT: "Total r" and TOT': "Total r'" and
        FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        WF: "wf(r - Id)" and WF': "wf(r' - Id)"
shows "wf ((r Osum r') - Id)"
proof(cases "r \<le> Id \<or> r' \<le> Id")
  assume Case1: "\<not>(r \<le> Id \<or> r' \<le> Id)"
  have "Field(r - Id) Int Field(r' - Id) = {}"
  using FLD mono_Field[of "r - Id" r]  mono_Field[of "r' - Id" r']
            Diff_subset[of r Id] Diff_subset[of r' Id] by blast
  thus ?thesis
  using Case1 Osum_minus_Id[of r r'] assms Osum_wf[of "r - Id" "r' - Id"]
        wf_subset[of "(r - Id) \<union>o (r' - Id)" "(r Osum r') - Id"] by auto
next
  have 1: "wf(Field r \<times> Field r')"
  using FLD by (auto simp add: wf_Int_Times)
  assume Case2: "r \<le> Id \<or> r' \<le> Id"
  moreover
  {assume Case21: "r \<le> Id"
   hence "(r Osum r') - Id \<le> (r' - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r')"
   using Osum_minus_Id1[of r r'] by simp
   moreover
   {have "Domain(Field r \<times> Field r') Int Range(r' - Id) = {}"
    using FLD unfolding Field_def by blast
    hence "wf((r' - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r'))"
    using 1 WF' wf_Un[of "Field r \<times> Field r'" "r' - Id"]
    by (auto simp add: Un_commute)
   }
   ultimately have ?thesis using wf_subset by blast
  }
  moreover
  {assume Case22: "r' \<le> Id"
   hence "(r Osum r') - Id \<le> (r - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r')"
   using Osum_minus_Id2[of r' r] by simp
   moreover
   {have "Range(Field r \<times> Field r') Int Domain(r - Id) = {}"
    using FLD unfolding Field_def by blast
    hence "wf((r - Id) \<union> (Field r \<times> Field r'))"
    using 1 WF wf_Un[of "r - Id" "Field r \<times> Field r'"]
    by (auto simp add: Un_commute)
   }
   ultimately have ?thesis using wf_subset by blast
  }
  ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma Osum_Well_order:
assumes FLD: "Field r Int Field r' = {}" and
        WELL: "Well_order r" and WELL': "Well_order r'"
shows "Well_order (r Osum r')"
proof-
  have "Total r \<and> Total r'" using WELL WELL'
  by (auto simp add: order_on_defs)
  thus ?thesis using assms unfolding well_order_on_def
  using Osum_Linear_order Osum_wf_Id by blast
qed

end