author | haftmann |
Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:06:11 +0100 | |
changeset 18103 | 7a524bfa8d65 |
parent 18030 | 5dadabde8fe4 |
child 18316 | 4b62e0cb3aa8 |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
11519 | 1 |
(* Title: Pure/proofterm.ML |
2 |
ID: $Id$ |
|
11540 | 3 |
Author: Stefan Berghofer, TU Muenchen |
11519 | 4 |
|
11540 | 5 |
LF style proof terms. |
11519 | 6 |
*) |
7 |
||
11615 | 8 |
infix 8 % %% %>; |
11519 | 9 |
|
10 |
signature BASIC_PROOFTERM = |
|
11 |
sig |
|
11543
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
12 |
val proofs: int ref |
11519 | 13 |
|
14 |
datatype proof = |
|
15 |
PBound of int |
|
16 |
| Abst of string * typ option * proof |
|
17 |
| AbsP of string * term option * proof |
|
17756 | 18 |
| % of proof * term option |
19 |
| %% of proof * proof |
|
11519 | 20 |
| Hyp of term |
21 |
| PThm of (string * (string * string list) list) * proof * term * typ list option |
|
22 |
| PAxm of string * term * typ list option |
|
23 |
| Oracle of string * term * typ list option |
|
17017 | 24 |
| MinProof of ((string * term) * proof) list * (string * term) list * (string * term) list; |
11519 | 25 |
|
11615 | 26 |
val %> : proof * term -> proof |
11519 | 27 |
end; |
28 |
||
29 |
signature PROOFTERM = |
|
30 |
sig |
|
31 |
include BASIC_PROOFTERM |
|
32 |
||
33 |
val infer_derivs : (proof -> proof -> proof) -> bool * proof -> bool * proof -> bool * proof |
|
34 |
val infer_derivs' : (proof -> proof) -> (bool * proof -> bool * proof) |
|
35 |
||
36 |
(** primitive operations **) |
|
37 |
val proof_combt : proof * term list -> proof |
|
38 |
val proof_combt' : proof * term option list -> proof |
|
39 |
val proof_combP : proof * proof list -> proof |
|
40 |
val strip_combt : proof -> proof * term option list |
|
41 |
val strip_combP : proof -> proof * proof list |
|
42 |
val strip_thm : proof -> proof |
|
43 |
val map_proof_terms : (term -> term) -> (typ -> typ) -> proof -> proof |
|
44 |
val fold_proof_terms : (term * 'a -> 'a) -> (typ * 'a -> 'a) -> 'a * proof -> 'a |
|
45 |
val add_prf_names : string list * proof -> string list |
|
46 |
val add_prf_tfree_names : string list * proof -> string list |
|
47 |
val add_prf_tvar_ixns : indexname list * proof -> indexname list |
|
12868 | 48 |
val maxidx_of_proof : proof -> int |
13744 | 49 |
val size_of_proof : proof -> int |
12907
27e6d344d724
New function change_type for changing type assignments of theorems,
berghofe
parents:
12890
diff
changeset
|
50 |
val change_type : typ list option -> proof -> proof |
11519 | 51 |
val prf_abstract_over : term -> proof -> proof |
52 |
val prf_incr_bv : int -> int -> int -> int -> proof -> proof |
|
53 |
val incr_pboundvars : int -> int -> proof -> proof |
|
54 |
val prf_loose_bvar1 : proof -> int -> bool |
|
55 |
val prf_loose_Pbvar1 : proof -> int -> bool |
|
12279 | 56 |
val prf_add_loose_bnos : int -> int -> proof -> |
57 |
int list * int list -> int list * int list |
|
11519 | 58 |
val norm_proof : Envir.env -> proof -> proof |
59 |
val norm_proof' : Envir.env -> proof -> proof |
|
60 |
val prf_subst_bounds : term list -> proof -> proof |
|
61 |
val prf_subst_pbounds : proof list -> proof -> proof |
|
62 |
val freeze_thaw_prf : proof -> proof * (proof -> proof) |
|
17017 | 63 |
val proof_of_min_axm : string * term -> proof |
64 |
val proof_of_min_thm : (string * term) * proof -> proof |
|
11519 | 65 |
|
17017 | 66 |
val thms_of_proof : proof -> (term * proof) list Symtab.table -> |
11519 | 67 |
(term * proof) list Symtab.table |
17017 | 68 |
val axms_of_proof : proof -> proof Symtab.table -> proof Symtab.table |
69 |
val oracles_of_proof : (string * term) list -> proof -> (string * term) list |
|
11519 | 70 |
|
71 |
(** proof terms for specific inference rules **) |
|
72 |
val implies_intr_proof : term -> proof -> proof |
|
73 |
val forall_intr_proof : term -> string -> proof -> proof |
|
15797 | 74 |
val varify_proof : term -> (string * sort) list -> proof -> proof |
11519 | 75 |
val freezeT : term -> proof -> proof |
76 |
val rotate_proof : term list -> term -> int -> proof -> proof |
|
77 |
val permute_prems_prf : term list -> int -> int -> proof -> proof |
|
16880 | 78 |
val instantiate : ((indexname * sort) * typ) list * ((indexname * typ) * term) list |
79 |
-> proof -> proof |
|
11519 | 80 |
val lift_proof : term -> int -> term -> proof -> proof |
81 |
val assumption_proof : term list -> term -> int -> proof -> proof |
|
82 |
val bicompose_proof : term list -> term list -> term list -> term option -> |
|
83 |
int -> proof -> proof -> proof |
|
84 |
val equality_axms : (string * term) list |
|
85 |
val reflexive_axm : proof |
|
86 |
val symmetric_axm : proof |
|
87 |
val transitive_axm : proof |
|
88 |
val equal_intr_axm : proof |
|
89 |
val equal_elim_axm : proof |
|
90 |
val abstract_rule_axm : proof |
|
91 |
val combination_axm : proof |
|
92 |
val reflexive : proof |
|
93 |
val symmetric : proof -> proof |
|
94 |
val transitive : term -> typ -> proof -> proof -> proof |
|
95 |
val abstract_rule : term -> string -> proof -> proof |
|
96 |
val combination : term -> term -> term -> term -> typ -> proof -> proof -> proof |
|
97 |
val equal_intr : term -> term -> proof -> proof -> proof |
|
98 |
val equal_elim : term -> term -> proof -> proof -> proof |
|
99 |
val axm_proof : string -> term -> proof |
|
100 |
val oracle_proof : string -> term -> proof |
|
16458 | 101 |
val thm_proof : theory -> string * (string * string list) list -> |
11519 | 102 |
term list -> term -> proof -> proof |
12923 | 103 |
val get_name_tags : term list -> term -> proof -> string * (string * string list) list |
11519 | 104 |
|
105 |
(** rewriting on proof terms **) |
|
12233 | 106 |
val add_prf_rrules : (proof * proof) list -> theory -> theory |
107 |
val add_prf_rprocs : (string * (Term.typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list -> |
|
108 |
theory -> theory |
|
17203 | 109 |
val rewrite_proof : theory -> (proof * proof) list * |
11519 | 110 |
(string * (typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list -> proof -> proof |
11615 | 111 |
val rewrite_proof_notypes : (proof * proof) list * |
112 |
(string * (typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list -> proof -> proof |
|
16536 | 113 |
val init_data: theory -> theory |
11519 | 114 |
|
115 |
end |
|
116 |
||
117 |
structure Proofterm : PROOFTERM = |
|
118 |
struct |
|
119 |
||
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
120 |
open Envir; |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
121 |
|
11519 | 122 |
datatype proof = |
123 |
PBound of int |
|
124 |
| Abst of string * typ option * proof |
|
125 |
| AbsP of string * term option * proof |
|
12497 | 126 |
| op % of proof * term option |
127 |
| op %% of proof * proof |
|
11519 | 128 |
| Hyp of term |
129 |
| PThm of (string * (string * string list) list) * proof * term * typ list option |
|
130 |
| PAxm of string * term * typ list option |
|
131 |
| Oracle of string * term * typ list option |
|
17017 | 132 |
| MinProof of ((string * term) * proof) list * (string * term) list * (string * term) list; |
11519 | 133 |
|
17017 | 134 |
fun proof_of_min_axm (s, prop) = PAxm (s, prop, NONE); |
135 |
fun proof_of_min_thm ((s, prop), prf) = PThm ((s, []), prf, prop, NONE); |
|
136 |
||
137 |
val string_term_ord = prod_ord fast_string_ord Term.fast_term_ord; |
|
138 |
||
139 |
fun oracles_of_proof oras prf = |
|
11519 | 140 |
let |
17017 | 141 |
fun oras_of (Abst (_, _, prf)) = oras_of prf |
142 |
| oras_of (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = oras_of prf |
|
143 |
| oras_of (prf % _) = oras_of prf |
|
144 |
| oras_of (prf1 %% prf2) = oras_of prf1 #> oras_of prf2 |
|
145 |
| oras_of (PThm ((name, _), prf, prop, _)) = (fn tabs as (thms, oras) => |
|
17412 | 146 |
case Symtab.lookup thms name of |
147 |
NONE => oras_of prf (Symtab.update (name, [prop]) thms, oras) |
|
17492 | 148 |
| SOME ps => if member (op =) ps prop then tabs else |
17412 | 149 |
oras_of prf (Symtab.update (name, prop::ps) thms, oras)) |
17017 | 150 |
| oras_of (Oracle (s, prop, _)) = |
151 |
apsnd (OrdList.insert string_term_ord (s, prop)) |
|
152 |
| oras_of (MinProof (thms, _, oras)) = |
|
153 |
apsnd (OrdList.union string_term_ord oras) #> |
|
154 |
fold (oras_of o proof_of_min_thm) thms |
|
155 |
| oras_of _ = I |
|
11519 | 156 |
in |
17017 | 157 |
snd (oras_of prf (Symtab.empty, oras)) |
11519 | 158 |
end; |
159 |
||
17017 | 160 |
fun thms_of_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = thms_of_proof prf |
161 |
| thms_of_proof (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = thms_of_proof prf |
|
162 |
| thms_of_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = thms_of_proof prf1 #> thms_of_proof prf2 |
|
163 |
| thms_of_proof (prf % _) = thms_of_proof prf |
|
164 |
| thms_of_proof (prf' as PThm ((s, _), prf, prop, _)) = (fn tab => |
|
17412 | 165 |
case Symtab.lookup tab s of |
166 |
NONE => thms_of_proof prf (Symtab.update (s, [(prop, prf')]) tab) |
|
17017 | 167 |
| SOME ps => if exists (equal prop o fst) ps then tab else |
17412 | 168 |
thms_of_proof prf (Symtab.update (s, (prop, prf')::ps) tab)) |
17017 | 169 |
| thms_of_proof (MinProof (prfs, _, _)) = fold (thms_of_proof o proof_of_min_thm) prfs |
170 |
| thms_of_proof _ = I; |
|
11519 | 171 |
|
17017 | 172 |
fun axms_of_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = axms_of_proof prf |
173 |
| axms_of_proof (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = axms_of_proof prf |
|
174 |
| axms_of_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = axms_of_proof prf1 #> axms_of_proof prf2 |
|
175 |
| axms_of_proof (prf % _) = axms_of_proof prf |
|
17412 | 176 |
| axms_of_proof (prf as PAxm (s, _, _)) = Symtab.update (s, prf) |
17017 | 177 |
| axms_of_proof (MinProof (_, prfs, _)) = fold (axms_of_proof o proof_of_min_axm) prfs |
178 |
| axms_of_proof _ = I; |
|
11519 | 179 |
|
180 |
(** collect all theorems, axioms and oracles **) |
|
181 |
||
17017 | 182 |
fun map3 f g h (thms, axms, oras) = (f thms, g axms, h oras); |
183 |
||
184 |
fun mk_min_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = mk_min_proof prf |
|
185 |
| mk_min_proof (AbsP (_, _, prf)) = mk_min_proof prf |
|
186 |
| mk_min_proof (prf % _) = mk_min_proof prf |
|
187 |
| mk_min_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = mk_min_proof prf1 #> mk_min_proof prf2 |
|
188 |
| mk_min_proof (PThm ((s, _), prf, prop, _)) = |
|
189 |
map3 (OrdList.insert (string_term_ord o pairself fst) ((s, prop), prf)) I I |
|
190 |
| mk_min_proof (PAxm (s, prop, _)) = |
|
191 |
map3 I (OrdList.insert string_term_ord (s, prop)) I |
|
192 |
| mk_min_proof (Oracle (s, prop, _)) = |
|
193 |
map3 I I (OrdList.insert string_term_ord (s, prop)) |
|
194 |
| mk_min_proof (MinProof (thms, axms, oras)) = |
|
195 |
map3 (OrdList.union (string_term_ord o pairself fst) thms) |
|
196 |
(OrdList.union string_term_ord axms) (OrdList.union string_term_ord oras) |
|
197 |
| mk_min_proof _ = I; |
|
11519 | 198 |
|
199 |
(** proof objects with different levels of detail **) |
|
200 |
||
11543
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
201 |
val proofs = ref 2; |
11519 | 202 |
|
11543
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
203 |
fun err_illegal_level i = |
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
204 |
error ("Illegal level of detail for proof objects: " ^ string_of_int i); |
11519 | 205 |
|
206 |
fun if_ora b = if b then oracles_of_proof else K; |
|
207 |
||
208 |
fun infer_derivs f (ora1, prf1) (ora2, prf2) = |
|
209 |
(ora1 orelse ora2, |
|
11543
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
210 |
case !proofs of |
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
211 |
2 => f prf1 prf2 |
17017 | 212 |
| 1 => MinProof (([], [], []) |> mk_min_proof prf1 |> mk_min_proof prf2) |
213 |
| 0 => MinProof ([], [], if_ora ora2 (if_ora ora1 [] prf1) prf2) |
|
11543
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
214 |
| i => err_illegal_level i); |
11519 | 215 |
|
17017 | 216 |
fun infer_derivs' f = infer_derivs (K f) (false, MinProof ([], [], [])); |
11519 | 217 |
|
15531 | 218 |
fun (prf %> t) = prf % SOME t; |
11519 | 219 |
|
15570 | 220 |
val proof_combt = Library.foldl (op %>); |
221 |
val proof_combt' = Library.foldl (op %); |
|
222 |
val proof_combP = Library.foldl (op %%); |
|
11519 | 223 |
|
224 |
fun strip_combt prf = |
|
11615 | 225 |
let fun stripc (prf % t, ts) = stripc (prf, t::ts) |
11519 | 226 |
| stripc x = x |
227 |
in stripc (prf, []) end; |
|
228 |
||
229 |
fun strip_combP prf = |
|
11615 | 230 |
let fun stripc (prf %% prf', prfs) = stripc (prf, prf'::prfs) |
11519 | 231 |
| stripc x = x |
232 |
in stripc (prf, []) end; |
|
233 |
||
234 |
fun strip_thm prf = (case strip_combt (fst (strip_combP prf)) of |
|
235 |
(PThm (_, prf', _, _), _) => prf' |
|
236 |
| _ => prf); |
|
237 |
||
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
238 |
val mk_Abst = foldr (fn ((s, T:typ), prf) => Abst (s, NONE, prf)); |
15531 | 239 |
fun mk_AbsP (i, prf) = funpow i (fn prf => AbsP ("H", NONE, prf)) prf; |
11519 | 240 |
|
15531 | 241 |
fun apsome' f NONE = raise SAME |
242 |
| apsome' f (SOME x) = SOME (f x); |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
243 |
|
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
244 |
fun same f x = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
245 |
let val x' = f x |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
246 |
in if x = x' then raise SAME else x' end; |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
247 |
|
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
248 |
fun map_proof_terms f g = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
249 |
let |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
250 |
fun mapp (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (Abst (s, apsome' (same g) T, mapph prf) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
251 |
handle SAME => Abst (s, T, mapp prf)) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
252 |
| mapp (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (AbsP (s, apsome' (same f) t, mapph prf) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
253 |
handle SAME => AbsP (s, t, mapp prf)) |
15570 | 254 |
| mapp (prf % t) = (mapp prf % Option.map f t |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
255 |
handle SAME => prf % apsome' (same f) t) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
256 |
| mapp (prf1 %% prf2) = (mapp prf1 %% mapph prf2 |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
257 |
handle SAME => prf1 %% mapp prf2) |
15531 | 258 |
| mapp (PThm (a, prf, prop, SOME Ts)) = |
259 |
PThm (a, prf, prop, SOME (same (map g) Ts)) |
|
260 |
| mapp (PAxm (a, prop, SOME Ts)) = |
|
261 |
PAxm (a, prop, SOME (same (map g) Ts)) |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
262 |
| mapp _ = raise SAME |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
263 |
and mapph prf = (mapp prf handle SAME => prf) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
264 |
|
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
265 |
in mapph end; |
11519 | 266 |
|
15531 | 267 |
fun fold_proof_terms f g (a, Abst (_, SOME T, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (g (T, a), prf) |
268 |
| fold_proof_terms f g (a, Abst (_, NONE, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf) |
|
269 |
| fold_proof_terms f g (a, AbsP (_, SOME t, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (f (t, a), prf) |
|
270 |
| fold_proof_terms f g (a, AbsP (_, NONE, prf)) = fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf) |
|
271 |
| fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf % SOME t) = f (t, fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf)) |
|
272 |
| fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf % NONE) = fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf) |
|
11615 | 273 |
| fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf1 %% prf2) = fold_proof_terms f g |
11519 | 274 |
(fold_proof_terms f g (a, prf1), prf2) |
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
275 |
| fold_proof_terms _ g (a, PThm (_, _, _, SOME Ts)) = foldr g a Ts |
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
276 |
| fold_proof_terms _ g (a, PAxm (_, prop, SOME Ts)) = foldr g a Ts |
11519 | 277 |
| fold_proof_terms _ _ (a, _) = a; |
278 |
||
279 |
val add_prf_names = fold_proof_terms add_term_names ((uncurry K) o swap); |
|
280 |
val add_prf_tfree_names = fold_proof_terms add_term_tfree_names add_typ_tfree_names; |
|
281 |
val add_prf_tvar_ixns = fold_proof_terms add_term_tvar_ixns (add_typ_ixns o swap); |
|
282 |
||
12868 | 283 |
fun maxidx_of_proof prf = fold_proof_terms |
284 |
(Int.max o apfst maxidx_of_term) (Int.max o apfst maxidx_of_typ) (~1, prf); |
|
285 |
||
13744 | 286 |
fun size_of_proof (Abst (_, _, prf)) = 1 + size_of_proof prf |
13749 | 287 |
| size_of_proof (AbsP (_, t, prf)) = 1 + size_of_proof prf |
13744 | 288 |
| size_of_proof (prf1 %% prf2) = size_of_proof prf1 + size_of_proof prf2 |
13749 | 289 |
| size_of_proof (prf % _) = 1 + size_of_proof prf |
13744 | 290 |
| size_of_proof _ = 1; |
291 |
||
12907
27e6d344d724
New function change_type for changing type assignments of theorems,
berghofe
parents:
12890
diff
changeset
|
292 |
fun change_type opTs (PThm (name, prf, prop, _)) = PThm (name, prf, prop, opTs) |
27e6d344d724
New function change_type for changing type assignments of theorems,
berghofe
parents:
12890
diff
changeset
|
293 |
| change_type opTs (PAxm (name, prop, _)) = PAxm (name, prop, opTs) |
27e6d344d724
New function change_type for changing type assignments of theorems,
berghofe
parents:
12890
diff
changeset
|
294 |
| change_type opTs (Oracle (name, prop, _)) = Oracle (name, prop, opTs) |
27e6d344d724
New function change_type for changing type assignments of theorems,
berghofe
parents:
12890
diff
changeset
|
295 |
| change_type _ prf = prf; |
27e6d344d724
New function change_type for changing type assignments of theorems,
berghofe
parents:
12890
diff
changeset
|
296 |
|
11519 | 297 |
|
298 |
(***** utilities *****) |
|
299 |
||
300 |
fun strip_abs (_::Ts) (Abs (_, _, t)) = strip_abs Ts t |
|
301 |
| strip_abs _ t = t; |
|
302 |
||
15570 | 303 |
fun mk_abs Ts t = Library.foldl (fn (t', T) => Abs ("", T, t')) (t, Ts); |
11519 | 304 |
|
305 |
||
306 |
(*Abstraction of a proof term over its occurrences of v, |
|
307 |
which must contain no loose bound variables. |
|
308 |
The resulting proof term is ready to become the body of an Abst.*) |
|
309 |
||
310 |
fun prf_abstract_over v = |
|
311 |
let |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
312 |
fun abst' lev u = if v aconv u then Bound lev else |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
313 |
(case u of |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
314 |
Abs (a, T, t) => Abs (a, T, abst' (lev + 1) t) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
315 |
| f $ t => (abst' lev f $ absth' lev t handle SAME => f $ abst' lev t) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
316 |
| _ => raise SAME) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
317 |
and absth' lev t = (abst' lev t handle SAME => t); |
11519 | 318 |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
319 |
fun abst lev (AbsP (a, t, prf)) = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
320 |
(AbsP (a, apsome' (abst' lev) t, absth lev prf) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
321 |
handle SAME => AbsP (a, t, abst lev prf)) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
322 |
| abst lev (Abst (a, T, prf)) = Abst (a, T, abst (lev + 1) prf) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
323 |
| abst lev (prf1 %% prf2) = (abst lev prf1 %% absth lev prf2 |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
324 |
handle SAME => prf1 %% abst lev prf2) |
15570 | 325 |
| abst lev (prf % t) = (abst lev prf % Option.map (absth' lev) t |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
326 |
handle SAME => prf % apsome' (abst' lev) t) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
327 |
| abst _ _ = raise SAME |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
328 |
and absth lev prf = (abst lev prf handle SAME => prf) |
11519 | 329 |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
330 |
in absth 0 end; |
11519 | 331 |
|
332 |
||
333 |
(*increments a proof term's non-local bound variables |
|
334 |
required when moving a proof term within abstractions |
|
335 |
inc is increment for bound variables |
|
336 |
lev is level at which a bound variable is considered 'loose'*) |
|
337 |
||
338 |
fun incr_bv' inct tlev t = incr_bv (inct, tlev, t); |
|
339 |
||
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
340 |
fun prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (PBound i) = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
341 |
if i >= Plev then PBound (i+incP) else raise SAME |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
342 |
| prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (AbsP (a, t, body)) = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
343 |
(AbsP (a, apsome' (same (incr_bv' inct tlev)) t, |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
344 |
prf_incr_bv incP inct (Plev+1) tlev body) handle SAME => |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
345 |
AbsP (a, t, prf_incr_bv' incP inct (Plev+1) tlev body)) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
346 |
| prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (Abst (a, T, body)) = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
347 |
Abst (a, T, prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev (tlev+1) body) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
348 |
| prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (prf %% prf') = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
349 |
(prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf %% prf_incr_bv incP inct Plev tlev prf' |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
350 |
handle SAME => prf %% prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf') |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
351 |
| prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev (prf % t) = |
15570 | 352 |
(prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf % Option.map (incr_bv' inct tlev) t |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
353 |
handle SAME => prf % apsome' (same (incr_bv' inct tlev)) t) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
354 |
| prf_incr_bv' _ _ _ _ _ = raise SAME |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
355 |
and prf_incr_bv incP inct Plev tlev prf = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
356 |
(prf_incr_bv' incP inct Plev tlev prf handle SAME => prf); |
11519 | 357 |
|
358 |
fun incr_pboundvars 0 0 prf = prf |
|
359 |
| incr_pboundvars incP inct prf = prf_incr_bv incP inct 0 0 prf; |
|
360 |
||
361 |
||
11615 | 362 |
fun prf_loose_bvar1 (prf1 %% prf2) k = prf_loose_bvar1 prf1 k orelse prf_loose_bvar1 prf2 k |
15531 | 363 |
| prf_loose_bvar1 (prf % SOME t) k = prf_loose_bvar1 prf k orelse loose_bvar1 (t, k) |
364 |
| prf_loose_bvar1 (_ % NONE) _ = true |
|
365 |
| prf_loose_bvar1 (AbsP (_, SOME t, prf)) k = loose_bvar1 (t, k) orelse prf_loose_bvar1 prf k |
|
366 |
| prf_loose_bvar1 (AbsP (_, NONE, _)) k = true |
|
11519 | 367 |
| prf_loose_bvar1 (Abst (_, _, prf)) k = prf_loose_bvar1 prf (k+1) |
368 |
| prf_loose_bvar1 _ _ = false; |
|
369 |
||
370 |
fun prf_loose_Pbvar1 (PBound i) k = i = k |
|
11615 | 371 |
| prf_loose_Pbvar1 (prf1 %% prf2) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf1 k orelse prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf2 k |
372 |
| prf_loose_Pbvar1 (prf % _) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf k |
|
11519 | 373 |
| prf_loose_Pbvar1 (AbsP (_, _, prf)) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf (k+1) |
374 |
| prf_loose_Pbvar1 (Abst (_, _, prf)) k = prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf k |
|
375 |
| prf_loose_Pbvar1 _ _ = false; |
|
376 |
||
12279 | 377 |
fun prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (PBound i) (is, js) = |
17492 | 378 |
if i < plev then (is, js) else (insert (op =) (i-plev) is, js) |
12279 | 379 |
| prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (prf1 %% prf2) p = |
380 |
prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev prf2 |
|
381 |
(prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev prf1 p) |
|
382 |
| prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (prf % opt) (is, js) = |
|
383 |
prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev prf (case opt of |
|
17492 | 384 |
NONE => (is, insert (op =) ~1 js) |
15531 | 385 |
| SOME t => (is, add_loose_bnos (t, tlev, js))) |
12279 | 386 |
| prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (AbsP (_, opt, prf)) (is, js) = |
387 |
prf_add_loose_bnos (plev+1) tlev prf (case opt of |
|
17492 | 388 |
NONE => (is, insert (op =) ~1 js) |
15531 | 389 |
| SOME t => (is, add_loose_bnos (t, tlev, js))) |
12279 | 390 |
| prf_add_loose_bnos plev tlev (Abst (_, _, prf)) p = |
391 |
prf_add_loose_bnos plev (tlev+1) prf p |
|
392 |
| prf_add_loose_bnos _ _ _ _ = ([], []); |
|
393 |
||
11519 | 394 |
|
395 |
(**** substitutions ****) |
|
396 |
||
397 |
fun norm_proof env = |
|
398 |
let |
|
12497 | 399 |
val envT = type_env env; |
400 |
fun norm (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (Abst (s, apsome' (norm_type_same envT) T, normh prf) |
|
11519 | 401 |
handle SAME => Abst (s, T, norm prf)) |
402 |
| norm (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (AbsP (s, apsome' (norm_term_same env) t, normh prf) |
|
403 |
handle SAME => AbsP (s, t, norm prf)) |
|
15570 | 404 |
| norm (prf % t) = (norm prf % Option.map (norm_term env) t |
11615 | 405 |
handle SAME => prf % apsome' (norm_term_same env) t) |
406 |
| norm (prf1 %% prf2) = (norm prf1 %% normh prf2 |
|
407 |
handle SAME => prf1 %% norm prf2) |
|
12497 | 408 |
| norm (PThm (s, prf, t, Ts)) = PThm (s, prf, t, apsome' (norm_types_same envT) Ts) |
409 |
| norm (PAxm (s, prop, Ts)) = PAxm (s, prop, apsome' (norm_types_same envT) Ts) |
|
11519 | 410 |
| norm _ = raise SAME |
411 |
and normh prf = (norm prf handle SAME => prf); |
|
412 |
in normh end; |
|
413 |
||
414 |
(***** Remove some types in proof term (to save space) *****) |
|
415 |
||
416 |
fun remove_types (Abs (s, _, t)) = Abs (s, dummyT, remove_types t) |
|
417 |
| remove_types (t $ u) = remove_types t $ remove_types u |
|
418 |
| remove_types (Const (s, _)) = Const (s, dummyT) |
|
419 |
| remove_types t = t; |
|
420 |
||
421 |
fun remove_types_env (Envir.Envir {iTs, asol, maxidx}) = |
|
15797 | 422 |
Envir.Envir {iTs = iTs, asol = Vartab.map (apsnd remove_types) asol, |
423 |
maxidx = maxidx}; |
|
11519 | 424 |
|
425 |
fun norm_proof' env prf = norm_proof (remove_types_env env) prf; |
|
426 |
||
427 |
(**** substitution of bound variables ****) |
|
428 |
||
429 |
fun prf_subst_bounds args prf = |
|
430 |
let |
|
431 |
val n = length args; |
|
432 |
fun subst' lev (Bound i) = |
|
433 |
(if i<lev then raise SAME (*var is locally bound*) |
|
434 |
else incr_boundvars lev (List.nth (args, i-lev)) |
|
435 |
handle Subscript => Bound (i-n) (*loose: change it*)) |
|
436 |
| subst' lev (Abs (a, T, body)) = Abs (a, T, subst' (lev+1) body) |
|
437 |
| subst' lev (f $ t) = (subst' lev f $ substh' lev t |
|
438 |
handle SAME => f $ subst' lev t) |
|
439 |
| subst' _ _ = raise SAME |
|
440 |
and substh' lev t = (subst' lev t handle SAME => t); |
|
441 |
||
442 |
fun subst lev (AbsP (a, t, body)) = (AbsP (a, apsome' (subst' lev) t, substh lev body) |
|
443 |
handle SAME => AbsP (a, t, subst lev body)) |
|
444 |
| subst lev (Abst (a, T, body)) = Abst (a, T, subst (lev+1) body) |
|
11615 | 445 |
| subst lev (prf %% prf') = (subst lev prf %% substh lev prf' |
446 |
handle SAME => prf %% subst lev prf') |
|
15570 | 447 |
| subst lev (prf % t) = (subst lev prf % Option.map (substh' lev) t |
11615 | 448 |
handle SAME => prf % apsome' (subst' lev) t) |
11519 | 449 |
| subst _ _ = raise SAME |
450 |
and substh lev prf = (subst lev prf handle SAME => prf) |
|
451 |
in case args of [] => prf | _ => substh 0 prf end; |
|
452 |
||
453 |
fun prf_subst_pbounds args prf = |
|
454 |
let |
|
455 |
val n = length args; |
|
456 |
fun subst (PBound i) Plev tlev = |
|
457 |
(if i < Plev then raise SAME (*var is locally bound*) |
|
458 |
else incr_pboundvars Plev tlev (List.nth (args, i-Plev)) |
|
459 |
handle Subscript => PBound (i-n) (*loose: change it*)) |
|
460 |
| subst (AbsP (a, t, body)) Plev tlev = AbsP (a, t, subst body (Plev+1) tlev) |
|
461 |
| subst (Abst (a, T, body)) Plev tlev = Abst (a, T, subst body Plev (tlev+1)) |
|
11615 | 462 |
| subst (prf %% prf') Plev tlev = (subst prf Plev tlev %% substh prf' Plev tlev |
463 |
handle SAME => prf %% subst prf' Plev tlev) |
|
464 |
| subst (prf % t) Plev tlev = subst prf Plev tlev % t |
|
11519 | 465 |
| subst prf _ _ = raise SAME |
466 |
and substh prf Plev tlev = (subst prf Plev tlev handle SAME => prf) |
|
467 |
in case args of [] => prf | _ => substh prf 0 0 end; |
|
468 |
||
469 |
||
470 |
(**** Freezing and thawing of variables in proof terms ****) |
|
471 |
||
472 |
fun frzT names = |
|
17325 | 473 |
map_type_tvar (fn (ixn, xs) => TFree ((the o AList.lookup (op =) names) ixn, xs)); |
11519 | 474 |
|
475 |
fun thawT names = |
|
17325 | 476 |
map_type_tfree (fn (s, xs) => case AList.lookup (op =) names s of |
15531 | 477 |
NONE => TFree (s, xs) |
478 |
| SOME ixn => TVar (ixn, xs)); |
|
11519 | 479 |
|
480 |
fun freeze names names' (t $ u) = |
|
481 |
freeze names names' t $ freeze names names' u |
|
482 |
| freeze names names' (Abs (s, T, t)) = |
|
483 |
Abs (s, frzT names' T, freeze names names' t) |
|
484 |
| freeze names names' (Const (s, T)) = Const (s, frzT names' T) |
|
485 |
| freeze names names' (Free (s, T)) = Free (s, frzT names' T) |
|
486 |
| freeze names names' (Var (ixn, T)) = |
|
17325 | 487 |
Free ((the o AList.lookup (op =) names) ixn, frzT names' T) |
11519 | 488 |
| freeze names names' t = t; |
489 |
||
490 |
fun thaw names names' (t $ u) = |
|
491 |
thaw names names' t $ thaw names names' u |
|
492 |
| thaw names names' (Abs (s, T, t)) = |
|
493 |
Abs (s, thawT names' T, thaw names names' t) |
|
494 |
| thaw names names' (Const (s, T)) = Const (s, thawT names' T) |
|
495 |
| thaw names names' (Free (s, T)) = |
|
496 |
let val T' = thawT names' T |
|
17325 | 497 |
in case AList.lookup (op =) names s of |
15531 | 498 |
NONE => Free (s, T') |
499 |
| SOME ixn => Var (ixn, T') |
|
11519 | 500 |
end |
501 |
| thaw names names' (Var (ixn, T)) = Var (ixn, thawT names' T) |
|
502 |
| thaw names names' t = t; |
|
503 |
||
504 |
fun freeze_thaw_prf prf = |
|
505 |
let |
|
506 |
val (fs, Tfs, vs, Tvs) = fold_proof_terms |
|
507 |
(fn (t, (fs, Tfs, vs, Tvs)) => |
|
508 |
(add_term_frees (t, fs), add_term_tfree_names (t, Tfs), |
|
509 |
add_term_vars (t, vs), add_term_tvar_ixns (t, Tvs))) |
|
510 |
(fn (T, (fs, Tfs, vs, Tvs)) => |
|
511 |
(fs, add_typ_tfree_names (T, Tfs), |
|
512 |
vs, add_typ_ixns (Tvs, T))) |
|
513 |
(([], [], [], []), prf); |
|
514 |
val fs' = map (fst o dest_Free) fs; |
|
515 |
val vs' = map (fst o dest_Var) vs; |
|
516 |
val names = vs' ~~ variantlist (map fst vs', fs'); |
|
517 |
val names' = Tvs ~~ variantlist (map fst Tvs, Tfs); |
|
518 |
val rnames = map swap names; |
|
519 |
val rnames' = map swap names'; |
|
520 |
in |
|
521 |
(map_proof_terms (freeze names names') (frzT names') prf, |
|
522 |
map_proof_terms (thaw rnames rnames') (thawT rnames')) |
|
523 |
end; |
|
524 |
||
525 |
||
526 |
(***** implication introduction *****) |
|
527 |
||
528 |
fun implies_intr_proof h prf = |
|
529 |
let |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
530 |
fun abshyp i (Hyp t) = if h aconv t then PBound i else raise SAME |
11519 | 531 |
| abshyp i (Abst (s, T, prf)) = Abst (s, T, abshyp i prf) |
532 |
| abshyp i (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = AbsP (s, t, abshyp (i+1) prf) |
|
11615 | 533 |
| abshyp i (prf % t) = abshyp i prf % t |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
534 |
| abshyp i (prf1 %% prf2) = (abshyp i prf1 %% abshyph i prf2 |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
535 |
handle SAME => prf1 %% abshyp i prf2) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
536 |
| abshyp _ _ = raise SAME |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
537 |
and abshyph i prf = (abshyp i prf handle SAME => prf) |
11519 | 538 |
in |
15531 | 539 |
AbsP ("H", NONE (*h*), abshyph 0 prf) |
11519 | 540 |
end; |
541 |
||
542 |
||
543 |
(***** forall introduction *****) |
|
544 |
||
15531 | 545 |
fun forall_intr_proof x a prf = Abst (a, NONE, prf_abstract_over x prf); |
11519 | 546 |
|
547 |
||
548 |
(***** varify *****) |
|
549 |
||
550 |
fun varify_proof t fixed prf = |
|
551 |
let |
|
15797 | 552 |
val fs = add_term_tfrees (t, []) \\ fixed; |
11519 | 553 |
val ixns = add_term_tvar_ixns (t, []); |
15797 | 554 |
val fmap = fs ~~ variantlist (map fst fs, map #1 ixns) |
11519 | 555 |
fun thaw (f as (a, S)) = |
17314 | 556 |
(case AList.lookup (op =) fmap f of |
15531 | 557 |
NONE => TFree f |
558 |
| SOME b => TVar ((b, 0), S)); |
|
11519 | 559 |
in map_proof_terms (map_term_types (map_type_tfree thaw)) (map_type_tfree thaw) prf |
560 |
end; |
|
561 |
||
562 |
||
563 |
local |
|
564 |
||
565 |
fun new_name (ix, (pairs,used)) = |
|
566 |
let val v = variant used (string_of_indexname ix) |
|
567 |
in ((ix, v) :: pairs, v :: used) end; |
|
568 |
||
17325 | 569 |
fun freeze_one alist (ix, sort) = (case AList.lookup (op =) alist ix of |
15531 | 570 |
NONE => TVar (ix, sort) |
571 |
| SOME name => TFree (name, sort)); |
|
11519 | 572 |
|
573 |
in |
|
574 |
||
575 |
fun freezeT t prf = |
|
576 |
let |
|
577 |
val used = it_term_types add_typ_tfree_names (t, []) |
|
578 |
and tvars = map #1 (it_term_types add_typ_tvars (t, [])); |
|
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
579 |
val (alist, _) = foldr new_name ([], used) tvars; |
11519 | 580 |
in |
581 |
(case alist of |
|
582 |
[] => prf (*nothing to do!*) |
|
583 |
| _ => |
|
584 |
let val frzT = map_type_tvar (freeze_one alist) |
|
585 |
in map_proof_terms (map_term_types frzT) frzT prf end) |
|
586 |
end; |
|
587 |
||
588 |
end; |
|
589 |
||
590 |
||
591 |
(***** rotate assumptions *****) |
|
592 |
||
593 |
fun rotate_proof Bs Bi m prf = |
|
594 |
let |
|
595 |
val params = Term.strip_all_vars Bi; |
|
596 |
val asms = Logic.strip_imp_prems (Term.strip_all_body Bi); |
|
597 |
val i = length asms; |
|
598 |
val j = length Bs; |
|
599 |
in |
|
600 |
mk_AbsP (j+1, proof_combP (prf, map PBound |
|
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
601 |
(j downto 1) @ [mk_Abst (mk_AbsP (i, |
11519 | 602 |
proof_combP (proof_combt (PBound i, map Bound ((length params - 1) downto 0)), |
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
603 |
map PBound (((i-m-1) downto 0) @ ((i-1) downto (i-m)))))) params])) |
11519 | 604 |
end; |
605 |
||
606 |
||
607 |
(***** permute premises *****) |
|
608 |
||
609 |
fun permute_prems_prf prems j k prf = |
|
610 |
let val n = length prems |
|
611 |
in mk_AbsP (n, proof_combP (prf, |
|
612 |
map PBound ((n-1 downto n-j) @ (k-1 downto 0) @ (n-j-1 downto k)))) |
|
613 |
end; |
|
614 |
||
615 |
||
616 |
(***** instantiation *****) |
|
617 |
||
16880 | 618 |
fun instantiate (instT, inst) prf = |
619 |
map_proof_terms (Term.instantiate (instT, map (apsnd remove_types) inst)) |
|
620 |
(Term.instantiateT instT) prf; |
|
11519 | 621 |
|
622 |
||
623 |
(***** lifting *****) |
|
624 |
||
625 |
fun lift_proof Bi inc prop prf = |
|
626 |
let |
|
627 |
fun lift'' Us Ts t = strip_abs Ts (Logic.incr_indexes (Us, inc) (mk_abs Ts t)); |
|
628 |
||
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
629 |
fun lift' Us Ts (Abst (s, T, prf)) = |
16880 | 630 |
(Abst (s, apsome' (same (Logic.incr_tvar inc)) T, lifth' Us (dummyT::Ts) prf) |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
631 |
handle SAME => Abst (s, T, lift' Us (dummyT::Ts) prf)) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
632 |
| lift' Us Ts (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
633 |
(AbsP (s, apsome' (same (lift'' Us Ts)) t, lifth' Us Ts prf) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
634 |
handle SAME => AbsP (s, t, lift' Us Ts prf)) |
15570 | 635 |
| lift' Us Ts (prf % t) = (lift' Us Ts prf % Option.map (lift'' Us Ts) t |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
636 |
handle SAME => prf % apsome' (same (lift'' Us Ts)) t) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
637 |
| lift' Us Ts (prf1 %% prf2) = (lift' Us Ts prf1 %% lifth' Us Ts prf2 |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
638 |
handle SAME => prf1 %% lift' Us Ts prf2) |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
639 |
| lift' _ _ (PThm (s, prf, prop, Ts)) = |
16880 | 640 |
PThm (s, prf, prop, apsome' (same (map (Logic.incr_tvar inc))) Ts) |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
641 |
| lift' _ _ (PAxm (s, prop, Ts)) = |
16880 | 642 |
PAxm (s, prop, apsome' (same (map (Logic.incr_tvar inc))) Ts) |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
643 |
| lift' _ _ _ = raise SAME |
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
644 |
and lifth' Us Ts prf = (lift' Us Ts prf handle SAME => prf); |
11519 | 645 |
|
18030 | 646 |
val ps = map (Logic.lift_all inc Bi) (Logic.strip_imp_prems prop); |
11519 | 647 |
val k = length ps; |
648 |
||
649 |
fun mk_app (b, (i, j, prf)) = |
|
11615 | 650 |
if b then (i-1, j, prf %% PBound i) else (i, j-1, prf %> Bound j); |
11519 | 651 |
|
652 |
fun lift Us bs i j (Const ("==>", _) $ A $ B) = |
|
15531 | 653 |
AbsP ("H", NONE (*A*), lift Us (true::bs) (i+1) j B) |
11519 | 654 |
| lift Us bs i j (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (a, T, t)) = |
15531 | 655 |
Abst (a, NONE (*T*), lift (T::Us) (false::bs) i (j+1) t) |
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
656 |
| lift Us bs i j _ = proof_combP (lifth' (rev Us) [] prf, |
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
657 |
map (fn k => (#3 (foldr mk_app (i-1, j-1, PBound k) bs))) |
11519 | 658 |
(i + k - 1 downto i)); |
659 |
in |
|
660 |
mk_AbsP (k, lift [] [] 0 0 Bi) |
|
661 |
end; |
|
662 |
||
663 |
||
664 |
(***** proof by assumption *****) |
|
665 |
||
15531 | 666 |
fun mk_asm_prf (Const ("==>", _) $ A $ B) i = AbsP ("H", NONE (*A*), mk_asm_prf B (i+1)) |
667 |
| mk_asm_prf (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (a, T, t)) i = Abst (a, NONE (*T*), mk_asm_prf t i) |
|
11519 | 668 |
| mk_asm_prf _ i = PBound i; |
669 |
||
670 |
fun assumption_proof Bs Bi n prf = |
|
671 |
mk_AbsP (length Bs, proof_combP (prf, |
|
672 |
map PBound (length Bs - 1 downto 0) @ [mk_asm_prf Bi (~n)])); |
|
673 |
||
674 |
||
675 |
(***** Composition of object rule with proof state *****) |
|
676 |
||
677 |
fun flatten_params_proof i j n (Const ("==>", _) $ A $ B, k) = |
|
15531 | 678 |
AbsP ("H", NONE (*A*), flatten_params_proof (i+1) j n (B, k)) |
11519 | 679 |
| flatten_params_proof i j n (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (a, T, t), k) = |
15531 | 680 |
Abst (a, NONE (*T*), flatten_params_proof i (j+1) n (t, k)) |
11519 | 681 |
| flatten_params_proof i j n (_, k) = proof_combP (proof_combt (PBound (k+i), |
682 |
map Bound (j-1 downto 0)), map PBound (i-1 downto 0 \ i-n)); |
|
683 |
||
684 |
fun bicompose_proof Bs oldAs newAs A n rprf sprf = |
|
685 |
let |
|
686 |
val la = length newAs; |
|
687 |
val lb = length Bs; |
|
688 |
in |
|
689 |
mk_AbsP (lb+la, proof_combP (sprf, |
|
11615 | 690 |
map PBound (lb + la - 1 downto la)) %% |
15570 | 691 |
proof_combP (rprf, (if n>0 then [mk_asm_prf (valOf A) (~n)] else []) @ |
11519 | 692 |
map (flatten_params_proof 0 0 n) (oldAs ~~ (la - 1 downto 0)))) |
693 |
end; |
|
694 |
||
695 |
||
696 |
(***** axioms for equality *****) |
|
697 |
||
14854 | 698 |
val aT = TFree ("'a", []); |
699 |
val bT = TFree ("'b", []); |
|
11519 | 700 |
val x = Free ("x", aT); |
701 |
val y = Free ("y", aT); |
|
702 |
val z = Free ("z", aT); |
|
703 |
val A = Free ("A", propT); |
|
704 |
val B = Free ("B", propT); |
|
705 |
val f = Free ("f", aT --> bT); |
|
706 |
val g = Free ("g", aT --> bT); |
|
707 |
||
708 |
local open Logic in |
|
709 |
||
710 |
val equality_axms = |
|
711 |
[("reflexive", mk_equals (x, x)), |
|
712 |
("symmetric", mk_implies (mk_equals (x, y), mk_equals (y, x))), |
|
713 |
("transitive", list_implies ([mk_equals (x, y), mk_equals (y, z)], mk_equals (x, z))), |
|
714 |
("equal_intr", list_implies ([mk_implies (A, B), mk_implies (B, A)], mk_equals (A, B))), |
|
715 |
("equal_elim", list_implies ([mk_equals (A, B), A], B)), |
|
716 |
("abstract_rule", Logic.mk_implies |
|
717 |
(all aT $ Abs ("x", aT, equals bT $ (f $ Bound 0) $ (g $ Bound 0)), |
|
718 |
equals (aT --> bT) $ |
|
719 |
Abs ("x", aT, f $ Bound 0) $ Abs ("x", aT, g $ Bound 0))), |
|
720 |
("combination", Logic.list_implies |
|
721 |
([Logic.mk_equals (f, g), Logic.mk_equals (x, y)], |
|
722 |
Logic.mk_equals (f $ x, g $ y)))]; |
|
723 |
||
724 |
val [reflexive_axm, symmetric_axm, transitive_axm, equal_intr_axm, |
|
725 |
equal_elim_axm, abstract_rule_axm, combination_axm] = |
|
15531 | 726 |
map (fn (s, t) => PAxm ("ProtoPure." ^ s, varify t, NONE)) equality_axms; |
11519 | 727 |
|
728 |
end; |
|
729 |
||
15531 | 730 |
val reflexive = reflexive_axm % NONE; |
11519 | 731 |
|
11615 | 732 |
fun symmetric (prf as PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _) = prf |
15531 | 733 |
| symmetric prf = symmetric_axm % NONE % NONE %% prf; |
11519 | 734 |
|
11615 | 735 |
fun transitive _ _ (PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _) prf2 = prf2 |
736 |
| transitive _ _ prf1 (PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _) = prf1 |
|
11519 | 737 |
| transitive u (Type ("prop", [])) prf1 prf2 = |
15531 | 738 |
transitive_axm % NONE % SOME (remove_types u) % NONE %% prf1 %% prf2 |
11519 | 739 |
| transitive u T prf1 prf2 = |
15531 | 740 |
transitive_axm % NONE % NONE % NONE %% prf1 %% prf2; |
11519 | 741 |
|
742 |
fun abstract_rule x a prf = |
|
15531 | 743 |
abstract_rule_axm % NONE % NONE %% forall_intr_proof x a prf; |
11519 | 744 |
|
11615 | 745 |
fun check_comb (PAxm ("ProtoPure.combination", _, _) % f % g % _ % _ %% prf %% _) = |
15570 | 746 |
isSome f orelse check_comb prf |
11615 | 747 |
| check_comb (PAxm ("ProtoPure.transitive", _, _) % _ % _ % _ %% prf1 %% prf2) = |
11519 | 748 |
check_comb prf1 andalso check_comb prf2 |
11615 | 749 |
| check_comb (PAxm ("ProtoPure.symmetric", _, _) % _ % _ %% prf) = check_comb prf |
11519 | 750 |
| check_comb _ = false; |
751 |
||
752 |
fun combination f g t u (Type (_, [T, U])) prf1 prf2 = |
|
753 |
let |
|
754 |
val f = Envir.beta_norm f; |
|
755 |
val g = Envir.beta_norm g; |
|
756 |
val prf = if check_comb prf1 then |
|
15531 | 757 |
combination_axm % NONE % NONE |
11519 | 758 |
else (case prf1 of |
11615 | 759 |
PAxm ("ProtoPure.reflexive", _, _) % _ => |
15531 | 760 |
combination_axm %> remove_types f % NONE |
11615 | 761 |
| _ => combination_axm %> remove_types f %> remove_types g) |
11519 | 762 |
in |
763 |
(case T of |
|
11615 | 764 |
Type ("fun", _) => prf % |
11519 | 765 |
(case head_of f of |
15531 | 766 |
Abs _ => SOME (remove_types t) |
767 |
| Var _ => SOME (remove_types t) |
|
768 |
| _ => NONE) % |
|
11519 | 769 |
(case head_of g of |
15531 | 770 |
Abs _ => SOME (remove_types u) |
771 |
| Var _ => SOME (remove_types u) |
|
772 |
| _ => NONE) %% prf1 %% prf2 |
|
773 |
| _ => prf % NONE % NONE %% prf1 %% prf2) |
|
11519 | 774 |
end; |
775 |
||
776 |
fun equal_intr A B prf1 prf2 = |
|
11615 | 777 |
equal_intr_axm %> remove_types A %> remove_types B %% prf1 %% prf2; |
11519 | 778 |
|
779 |
fun equal_elim A B prf1 prf2 = |
|
11615 | 780 |
equal_elim_axm %> remove_types A %> remove_types B %% prf1 %% prf2; |
11519 | 781 |
|
782 |
||
783 |
(***** axioms and theorems *****) |
|
784 |
||
17492 | 785 |
fun vars_of t = rev (fold_aterms (fn v as Var _ => insert (op =) v | _ => I) t []); |
11519 | 786 |
|
787 |
fun test_args _ [] = true |
|
788 |
| test_args is (Bound i :: ts) = |
|
17492 | 789 |
not (member (op =) is i) andalso test_args (i :: is) ts |
11519 | 790 |
| test_args _ _ = false; |
791 |
||
792 |
fun is_fun (Type ("fun", _)) = true |
|
793 |
| is_fun (TVar _) = true |
|
794 |
| is_fun _ = false; |
|
795 |
||
796 |
fun add_funvars Ts (vs, t) = |
|
797 |
if is_fun (fastype_of1 (Ts, t)) then |
|
15570 | 798 |
vs union List.mapPartial (fn Var (ixn, T) => |
15531 | 799 |
if is_fun T then SOME ixn else NONE | _ => NONE) (vars_of t) |
11519 | 800 |
else vs; |
801 |
||
802 |
fun add_npvars q p Ts (vs, Const ("==>", _) $ t $ u) = |
|
803 |
add_npvars q p Ts (add_npvars q (not p) Ts (vs, t), u) |
|
804 |
| add_npvars q p Ts (vs, Const ("all", Type (_, [Type (_, [T, _]), _])) $ t) = |
|
805 |
add_npvars q p Ts (vs, if p andalso q then betapply (t, Var (("",0), T)) else t) |
|
12041 | 806 |
| add_npvars q p Ts (vs, Abs (_, T, t)) = add_npvars q p (T::Ts) (vs, t) |
807 |
| add_npvars _ _ Ts (vs, t) = add_npvars' Ts (vs, t) |
|
808 |
and add_npvars' Ts (vs, t) = (case strip_comb t of |
|
11519 | 809 |
(Var (ixn, _), ts) => if test_args [] ts then vs |
17314 | 810 |
else Library.foldl (add_npvars' Ts) |
811 |
(AList.update (op =) (ixn, |
|
812 |
Library.foldl (add_funvars Ts) ((these ooo AList.lookup) (op =) vs ixn, ts)) vs, ts) |
|
15570 | 813 |
| (Abs (_, T, u), ts) => Library.foldl (add_npvars' (T::Ts)) (vs, u :: ts) |
814 |
| (_, ts) => Library.foldl (add_npvars' Ts) (vs, ts)); |
|
11519 | 815 |
|
816 |
fun prop_vars (Const ("==>", _) $ P $ Q) = prop_vars P union prop_vars Q |
|
817 |
| prop_vars (Const ("all", _) $ Abs (_, _, t)) = prop_vars t |
|
818 |
| prop_vars t = (case strip_comb t of |
|
819 |
(Var (ixn, _), _) => [ixn] | _ => []); |
|
820 |
||
821 |
fun is_proj t = |
|
822 |
let |
|
823 |
fun is_p i t = (case strip_comb t of |
|
824 |
(Bound j, []) => false |
|
825 |
| (Bound j, ts) => j >= i orelse exists (is_p i) ts |
|
826 |
| (Abs (_, _, u), _) => is_p (i+1) u |
|
827 |
| (_, ts) => exists (is_p i) ts) |
|
828 |
in (case strip_abs_body t of |
|
829 |
Bound _ => true |
|
830 |
| t' => is_p 0 t') |
|
831 |
end; |
|
832 |
||
833 |
fun needed_vars prop = |
|
15570 | 834 |
Library.foldl op union ([], map op ins (add_npvars true true [] ([], prop))) union |
11519 | 835 |
prop_vars prop; |
836 |
||
837 |
fun gen_axm_proof c name prop = |
|
838 |
let |
|
839 |
val nvs = needed_vars prop; |
|
840 |
val args = map (fn (v as Var (ixn, _)) => |
|
17492 | 841 |
if member (op =) nvs ixn then SOME v else NONE) (vars_of prop) @ |
16983 | 842 |
map SOME (sort Term.term_ord (term_frees prop)); |
11519 | 843 |
in |
15531 | 844 |
proof_combt' (c (name, prop, NONE), args) |
11519 | 845 |
end; |
846 |
||
847 |
val axm_proof = gen_axm_proof PAxm; |
|
17017 | 848 |
|
849 |
val dummy = Const (Term.dummy_patternN, dummyT); |
|
850 |
||
851 |
fun oracle_proof name prop = |
|
852 |
if !proofs = 0 then Oracle (name, dummy, NONE) |
|
853 |
else gen_axm_proof Oracle name prop; |
|
11519 | 854 |
|
17492 | 855 |
fun shrink_proof thy = |
856 |
let |
|
857 |
val compress_typ = Compress.typ thy; |
|
858 |
val compress_term = Compress.term thy; |
|
859 |
||
860 |
fun shrink ls lev (prf as Abst (a, T, body)) = |
|
861 |
let val (b, is, ch, body') = shrink ls (lev+1) body |
|
862 |
in (b, is, ch, if ch then Abst (a, Option.map compress_typ T, body') else prf) end |
|
863 |
| shrink ls lev (prf as AbsP (a, t, body)) = |
|
864 |
let val (b, is, ch, body') = shrink (lev::ls) lev body |
|
865 |
in (b orelse member (op =) is 0, List.mapPartial (fn 0 => NONE | i => SOME (i-1)) is, |
|
866 |
ch, if ch then AbsP (a, Option.map compress_term t, body') else prf) |
|
867 |
end |
|
868 |
| shrink ls lev prf = |
|
869 |
let val (is, ch, _, prf') = shrink' ls lev [] [] prf |
|
870 |
in (false, is, ch, prf') end |
|
871 |
and shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as prf1 %% prf2) = |
|
872 |
let |
|
873 |
val p as (_, is', ch', prf') = shrink ls lev prf2; |
|
874 |
val (is, ch, ts', prf'') = shrink' ls lev ts (p::prfs) prf1 |
|
875 |
in (is union is', ch orelse ch', ts', |
|
876 |
if ch orelse ch' then prf'' %% prf' else prf) |
|
877 |
end |
|
878 |
| shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as prf1 % t) = |
|
879 |
let val (is, ch, (ch', t')::ts', prf') = shrink' ls lev (t::ts) prfs prf1 |
|
880 |
in (is, ch orelse ch', ts', |
|
881 |
if ch orelse ch' then prf' % Option.map compress_term t' else prf) end |
|
882 |
| shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as PBound i) = |
|
883 |
(if exists (fn SOME (Bound j) => lev-j <= List.nth (ls, i) | _ => true) ts |
|
884 |
orelse not (null (duplicates |
|
885 |
(Library.foldl (fn (js, SOME (Bound j)) => j :: js | (js, _) => js) ([], ts)))) |
|
886 |
orelse exists #1 prfs then [i] else [], false, map (pair false) ts, prf) |
|
887 |
| shrink' ls lev ts prfs (Hyp t) = ([], false, map (pair false) ts, Hyp (compress_term t)) |
|
888 |
| shrink' ls lev ts prfs (prf as MinProof _) = |
|
889 |
([], false, map (pair false) ts, prf) |
|
890 |
| shrink' ls lev ts prfs prf = |
|
891 |
let |
|
892 |
val prop = (case prf of PThm (_, _, prop, _) => prop | PAxm (_, prop, _) => prop |
|
893 |
| Oracle (_, prop, _) => prop | _ => error "shrink: proof not in normal form"); |
|
894 |
val vs = vars_of prop; |
|
895 |
val (ts', ts'') = splitAt (length vs, ts) |
|
896 |
val insts = Library.take (length ts', map (fst o dest_Var) vs) ~~ ts'; |
|
897 |
val nvs = Library.foldl (fn (ixns', (ixn, ixns)) => |
|
898 |
insert (op =) ixn (case AList.lookup (op =) insts ixn of |
|
899 |
SOME (SOME t) => if is_proj t then ixns union ixns' else ixns' |
|
900 |
| _ => ixns union ixns')) |
|
901 |
(needed prop ts'' prfs, add_npvars false true [] ([], prop)); |
|
902 |
val insts' = map |
|
903 |
(fn (ixn, x as SOME _) => if member (op =) nvs ixn then (false, x) else (true, NONE) |
|
904 |
| (_, x) => (false, x)) insts |
|
905 |
in ([], false, insts' @ map (pair false) ts'', prf) end |
|
906 |
and needed (Const ("==>", _) $ t $ u) ts ((b, _, _, _)::prfs) = |
|
907 |
(if b then map (fst o dest_Var) (vars_of t) else []) union needed u ts prfs |
|
908 |
| needed (Var (ixn, _)) (_::_) _ = [ixn] |
|
909 |
| needed _ _ _ = []; |
|
910 |
in shrink end; |
|
11519 | 911 |
|
912 |
||
913 |
(**** Simple first order matching functions for terms and proofs ****) |
|
914 |
||
915 |
exception PMatch; |
|
916 |
||
917 |
(** see pattern.ML **) |
|
918 |
||
15570 | 919 |
fun flt (i: int) = List.filter (fn n => n < i); |
12279 | 920 |
|
921 |
fun fomatch Ts tymatch j = |
|
11519 | 922 |
let |
923 |
fun mtch (instsp as (tyinsts, insts)) = fn |
|
924 |
(Var (ixn, T), t) => |
|
12279 | 925 |
if j>0 andalso not (null (flt j (loose_bnos t))) |
926 |
then raise PMatch |
|
927 |
else (tymatch (tyinsts, fn () => (T, fastype_of1 (Ts, t))), |
|
928 |
(ixn, t) :: insts) |
|
11519 | 929 |
| (Free (a, T), Free (b, U)) => |
12279 | 930 |
if a=b then (tymatch (tyinsts, K (T, U)), insts) else raise PMatch |
11519 | 931 |
| (Const (a, T), Const (b, U)) => |
12279 | 932 |
if a=b then (tymatch (tyinsts, K (T, U)), insts) else raise PMatch |
11519 | 933 |
| (f $ t, g $ u) => mtch (mtch instsp (f, g)) (t, u) |
12279 | 934 |
| (Bound i, Bound j) => if i=j then instsp else raise PMatch |
11519 | 935 |
| _ => raise PMatch |
936 |
in mtch end; |
|
937 |
||
12279 | 938 |
fun match_proof Ts tymatch = |
11519 | 939 |
let |
15531 | 940 |
fun optmatch _ inst (NONE, _) = inst |
941 |
| optmatch _ _ (SOME _, NONE) = raise PMatch |
|
942 |
| optmatch mtch inst (SOME x, SOME y) = mtch inst (x, y) |
|
12279 | 943 |
|
944 |
fun matcht Ts j (pinst, tinst) (t, u) = |
|
945 |
(pinst, fomatch Ts tymatch j tinst (t, Envir.beta_norm u)); |
|
946 |
fun matchT (pinst, (tyinsts, insts)) p = |
|
947 |
(pinst, (tymatch (tyinsts, K p), insts)); |
|
15570 | 948 |
fun matchTs inst (Ts, Us) = Library.foldl (uncurry matchT) (inst, Ts ~~ Us); |
12279 | 949 |
|
950 |
fun mtch Ts i j (pinst, tinst) (Hyp (Var (ixn, _)), prf) = |
|
951 |
if i = 0 andalso j = 0 then ((ixn, prf) :: pinst, tinst) |
|
952 |
else (case apfst (flt i) (apsnd (flt j) |
|
953 |
(prf_add_loose_bnos 0 0 prf ([], []))) of |
|
954 |
([], []) => ((ixn, incr_pboundvars (~i) (~j) prf) :: pinst, tinst) |
|
955 |
| ([], _) => if j = 0 then |
|
956 |
((ixn, incr_pboundvars (~i) (~j) prf) :: pinst, tinst) |
|
957 |
else raise PMatch |
|
958 |
| _ => raise PMatch) |
|
959 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (prf1 % opt1, prf2 % opt2) = |
|
960 |
optmatch (matcht Ts j) (mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, prf2)) (opt1, opt2) |
|
961 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (prf1 %% prf2, prf1' %% prf2') = |
|
962 |
mtch Ts i j (mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, prf1')) (prf2, prf2') |
|
963 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (Abst (_, opT, prf1), Abst (_, opU, prf2)) = |
|
15570 | 964 |
mtch (getOpt (opU,dummyT) :: Ts) i (j+1) |
12279 | 965 |
(optmatch matchT inst (opT, opU)) (prf1, prf2) |
966 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, Abst (_, opU, prf2)) = |
|
15570 | 967 |
mtch (getOpt (opU,dummyT) :: Ts) i (j+1) inst |
12279 | 968 |
(incr_pboundvars 0 1 prf1 %> Bound 0, prf2) |
969 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (AbsP (_, opt, prf1), AbsP (_, opu, prf2)) = |
|
970 |
mtch Ts (i+1) j (optmatch (matcht Ts j) inst (opt, opu)) (prf1, prf2) |
|
971 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (prf1, AbsP (_, _, prf2)) = |
|
972 |
mtch Ts (i+1) j inst (incr_pboundvars 1 0 prf1 %% PBound 0, prf2) |
|
973 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (PThm ((name1, _), _, prop1, opTs), |
|
974 |
PThm ((name2, _), _, prop2, opUs)) = |
|
11519 | 975 |
if name1=name2 andalso prop1=prop2 then |
12279 | 976 |
optmatch matchTs inst (opTs, opUs) |
11519 | 977 |
else raise PMatch |
12279 | 978 |
| mtch Ts i j inst (PAxm (s1, _, opTs), PAxm (s2, _, opUs)) = |
979 |
if s1=s2 then optmatch matchTs inst (opTs, opUs) |
|
11519 | 980 |
else raise PMatch |
12279 | 981 |
| mtch _ _ _ inst (PBound i, PBound j) = if i = j then inst else raise PMatch |
982 |
| mtch _ _ _ _ _ = raise PMatch |
|
983 |
in mtch Ts 0 0 end; |
|
11519 | 984 |
|
985 |
fun prf_subst (pinst, (tyinsts, insts)) = |
|
986 |
let |
|
15797 | 987 |
val substT = Envir.typ_subst_TVars tyinsts; |
11519 | 988 |
|
17325 | 989 |
fun subst' lev (t as Var (ixn, _)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) insts ixn of |
15531 | 990 |
NONE => t |
991 |
| SOME u => incr_boundvars lev u) |
|
11519 | 992 |
| subst' lev (Const (s, T)) = Const (s, substT T) |
993 |
| subst' lev (Free (s, T)) = Free (s, substT T) |
|
994 |
| subst' lev (Abs (a, T, body)) = Abs (a, substT T, subst' (lev+1) body) |
|
995 |
| subst' lev (f $ t) = subst' lev f $ subst' lev t |
|
996 |
| subst' _ t = t; |
|
997 |
||
998 |
fun subst plev tlev (AbsP (a, t, body)) = |
|
15570 | 999 |
AbsP (a, Option.map (subst' tlev) t, subst (plev+1) tlev body) |
11519 | 1000 |
| subst plev tlev (Abst (a, T, body)) = |
15570 | 1001 |
Abst (a, Option.map substT T, subst plev (tlev+1) body) |
11615 | 1002 |
| subst plev tlev (prf %% prf') = subst plev tlev prf %% subst plev tlev prf' |
15570 | 1003 |
| subst plev tlev (prf % t) = subst plev tlev prf % Option.map (subst' tlev) t |
17325 | 1004 |
| subst plev tlev (prf as Hyp (Var (ixn, _))) = (case AList.lookup (op =) pinst ixn of |
15531 | 1005 |
NONE => prf |
1006 |
| SOME prf' => incr_pboundvars plev tlev prf') |
|
11519 | 1007 |
| subst _ _ (PThm (id, prf, prop, Ts)) = |
15570 | 1008 |
PThm (id, prf, prop, Option.map (map substT) Ts) |
11519 | 1009 |
| subst _ _ (PAxm (id, prop, Ts)) = |
15570 | 1010 |
PAxm (id, prop, Option.map (map substT) Ts) |
11519 | 1011 |
| subst _ _ t = t |
1012 |
in subst 0 0 end; |
|
1013 |
||
12871
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1014 |
(*A fast unification filter: true unless the two terms cannot be unified. |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1015 |
Terms must be NORMAL. Treats all Vars as distinct. *) |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1016 |
fun could_unify prf1 prf2 = |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1017 |
let |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1018 |
fun matchrands (prf1 %% prf2) (prf1' %% prf2') = |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1019 |
could_unify prf2 prf2' andalso matchrands prf1 prf1' |
15531 | 1020 |
| matchrands (prf % SOME t) (prf' % SOME t') = |
12871
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1021 |
Term.could_unify (t, t') andalso matchrands prf prf' |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1022 |
| matchrands (prf % _) (prf' % _) = matchrands prf prf' |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1023 |
| matchrands _ _ = true |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1024 |
|
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1025 |
fun head_of (prf %% _) = head_of prf |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1026 |
| head_of (prf % _) = head_of prf |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1027 |
| head_of prf = prf |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1028 |
|
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1029 |
in case (head_of prf1, head_of prf2) of |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1030 |
(_, Hyp (Var _)) => true |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1031 |
| (Hyp (Var _), _) => true |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1032 |
| (PThm ((a, _), _, propa, _), PThm ((b, _), _, propb, _)) => |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1033 |
a = b andalso propa = propb andalso matchrands prf1 prf2 |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1034 |
| (PAxm (a, _, _), PAxm (b, _, _)) => a = b andalso matchrands prf1 prf2 |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1035 |
| (PBound i, PBound j) => i = j andalso matchrands prf1 prf2 |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1036 |
| (AbsP _, _) => true (*because of possible eta equality*) |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1037 |
| (Abst _, _) => true |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1038 |
| (_, AbsP _) => true |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1039 |
| (_, Abst _) => true |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1040 |
| _ => false |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1041 |
end; |
21486a0557d1
Added function could_unify to speed up rewriting of proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12868
diff
changeset
|
1042 |
|
11519 | 1043 |
(**** rewriting on proof terms ****) |
1044 |
||
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1045 |
val skel0 = PBound 0; |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1046 |
|
12279 | 1047 |
fun rewrite_prf tymatch (rules, procs) prf = |
11519 | 1048 |
let |
15531 | 1049 |
fun rew _ (Abst (_, _, body) % SOME t) = SOME (prf_subst_bounds [t] body, skel0) |
1050 |
| rew _ (AbsP (_, _, body) %% prf) = SOME (prf_subst_pbounds [prf] body, skel0) |
|
11519 | 1051 |
| rew Ts prf = (case get_first (fn (_, r) => r Ts prf) procs of |
15531 | 1052 |
SOME prf' => SOME (prf', skel0) |
1053 |
| NONE => get_first (fn (prf1, prf2) => SOME (prf_subst |
|
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1054 |
(match_proof Ts tymatch ([], (Vartab.empty, [])) (prf1, prf)) prf2, prf2) |
15570 | 1055 |
handle PMatch => NONE) (List.filter (could_unify prf o fst) rules)); |
11519 | 1056 |
|
11615 | 1057 |
fun rew0 Ts (prf as AbsP (_, _, prf' %% PBound 0)) = |
11519 | 1058 |
if prf_loose_Pbvar1 prf' 0 then rew Ts prf |
1059 |
else |
|
1060 |
let val prf'' = incr_pboundvars (~1) 0 prf' |
|
15570 | 1061 |
in SOME (getOpt (rew Ts prf'', (prf'', skel0))) end |
15531 | 1062 |
| rew0 Ts (prf as Abst (_, _, prf' % SOME (Bound 0))) = |
11519 | 1063 |
if prf_loose_bvar1 prf' 0 then rew Ts prf |
1064 |
else |
|
1065 |
let val prf'' = incr_pboundvars 0 (~1) prf' |
|
15570 | 1066 |
in SOME (getOpt (rew Ts prf'', (prf'', skel0))) end |
11519 | 1067 |
| rew0 Ts prf = rew Ts prf; |
1068 |
||
15531 | 1069 |
fun rew1 _ (Hyp (Var _)) _ = NONE |
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1070 |
| rew1 Ts skel prf = (case rew2 Ts skel prf of |
15531 | 1071 |
SOME prf1 => (case rew0 Ts prf1 of |
15570 | 1072 |
SOME (prf2, skel') => SOME (getOpt (rew1 Ts skel' prf2, prf2)) |
15531 | 1073 |
| NONE => SOME prf1) |
1074 |
| NONE => (case rew0 Ts prf of |
|
15570 | 1075 |
SOME (prf1, skel') => SOME (getOpt (rew1 Ts skel' prf1, prf1)) |
15531 | 1076 |
| NONE => NONE)) |
11519 | 1077 |
|
15531 | 1078 |
and rew2 Ts skel (prf % SOME t) = (case prf of |
11519 | 1079 |
Abst (_, _, body) => |
1080 |
let val prf' = prf_subst_bounds [t] body |
|
15570 | 1081 |
in SOME (getOpt (rew2 Ts skel0 prf', prf')) end |
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1082 |
| _ => (case rew1 Ts (case skel of skel' % _ => skel' | _ => skel0) prf of |
15531 | 1083 |
SOME prf' => SOME (prf' % SOME t) |
1084 |
| NONE => NONE)) |
|
15570 | 1085 |
| rew2 Ts skel (prf % NONE) = Option.map (fn prf' => prf' % NONE) |
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1086 |
(rew1 Ts (case skel of skel' % _ => skel' | _ => skel0) prf) |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1087 |
| rew2 Ts skel (prf1 %% prf2) = (case prf1 of |
11519 | 1088 |
AbsP (_, _, body) => |
1089 |
let val prf' = prf_subst_pbounds [prf2] body |
|
15570 | 1090 |
in SOME (getOpt (rew2 Ts skel0 prf', prf')) end |
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1091 |
| _ => |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1092 |
let val (skel1, skel2) = (case skel of |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1093 |
skel1 %% skel2 => (skel1, skel2) |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1094 |
| _ => (skel0, skel0)) |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1095 |
in case rew1 Ts skel1 prf1 of |
15531 | 1096 |
SOME prf1' => (case rew1 Ts skel2 prf2 of |
1097 |
SOME prf2' => SOME (prf1' %% prf2') |
|
1098 |
| NONE => SOME (prf1' %% prf2)) |
|
1099 |
| NONE => (case rew1 Ts skel2 prf2 of |
|
1100 |
SOME prf2' => SOME (prf1 %% prf2') |
|
1101 |
| NONE => NONE) |
|
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1102 |
end) |
15570 | 1103 |
| rew2 Ts skel (Abst (s, T, prf)) = (case rew1 (getOpt (T,dummyT) :: Ts) |
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1104 |
(case skel of Abst (_, _, skel') => skel' | _ => skel0) prf of |
15531 | 1105 |
SOME prf' => SOME (Abst (s, T, prf')) |
1106 |
| NONE => NONE) |
|
13102
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1107 |
| rew2 Ts skel (AbsP (s, t, prf)) = (case rew1 Ts |
b6f8aae5f152
Added skeletons to speed up rewriting on proof terms.
berghofe
parents:
12923
diff
changeset
|
1108 |
(case skel of AbsP (_, _, skel') => skel' | _ => skel0) prf of |
15531 | 1109 |
SOME prf' => SOME (AbsP (s, t, prf')) |
1110 |
| NONE => NONE) |
|
1111 |
| rew2 _ _ _ = NONE |
|
11519 | 1112 |
|
15570 | 1113 |
in getOpt (rew1 [] skel0 prf, prf) end; |
11519 | 1114 |
|
17203 | 1115 |
fun rewrite_proof thy = rewrite_prf (fn (tyenv, f) => |
1116 |
Sign.typ_match thy (f ()) tyenv handle Type.TYPE_MATCH => raise PMatch); |
|
11519 | 1117 |
|
11715
592923615f77
Tuned several functions to improve sharing of unchanged subproofs.
berghofe
parents:
11652
diff
changeset
|
1118 |
fun rewrite_proof_notypes rews = rewrite_prf fst rews; |
11615 | 1119 |
|
16940 | 1120 |
|
11519 | 1121 |
(**** theory data ****) |
1122 |
||
16458 | 1123 |
structure ProofData = TheoryDataFun |
1124 |
(struct |
|
11519 | 1125 |
val name = "Pure/proof"; |
1126 |
type T = ((proof * proof) list * |
|
12233 | 1127 |
(string * (typ list -> proof -> proof option)) list); |
11519 | 1128 |
|
12233 | 1129 |
val empty = ([], []); |
1130 |
val copy = I; |
|
16458 | 1131 |
val extend = I; |
1132 |
fun merge _ ((rules1, procs1), (rules2, procs2)) = |
|
12293 | 1133 |
(merge_lists rules1 rules2, merge_alists procs1 procs2); |
11519 | 1134 |
fun print _ _ = (); |
16458 | 1135 |
end); |
11519 | 1136 |
|
16536 | 1137 |
val init_data = ProofData.init; |
11519 | 1138 |
|
12233 | 1139 |
fun add_prf_rrules rs thy = |
11519 | 1140 |
let val r = ProofData.get thy |
12233 | 1141 |
in ProofData.put (rs @ fst r, snd r) thy end; |
11519 | 1142 |
|
12233 | 1143 |
fun add_prf_rprocs ps thy = |
11519 | 1144 |
let val r = ProofData.get thy |
12233 | 1145 |
in ProofData.put (fst r, ps @ snd r) thy end; |
11519 | 1146 |
|
16458 | 1147 |
fun thm_proof thy (name, tags) hyps prop prf = |
11519 | 1148 |
let |
12923 | 1149 |
val prop = Logic.list_implies (hyps, prop); |
11519 | 1150 |
val nvs = needed_vars prop; |
1151 |
val args = map (fn (v as Var (ixn, _)) => |
|
17492 | 1152 |
if member (op =) nvs ixn then SOME v else NONE) (vars_of prop) @ |
16983 | 1153 |
map SOME (sort Term.term_ord (term_frees prop)); |
11543
d61b913431c5
renamed `keep_derivs' to `proofs', and made an integer;
wenzelm
parents:
11540
diff
changeset
|
1154 |
val opt_prf = if ! proofs = 2 then |
17492 | 1155 |
#4 (shrink_proof thy [] 0 (rewrite_prf fst (ProofData.get thy) |
15574
b1d1b5bfc464
Removed practically all references to Library.foldr.
skalberg
parents:
15570
diff
changeset
|
1156 |
(foldr (uncurry implies_intr_proof) prf hyps))) |
17017 | 1157 |
else MinProof (mk_min_proof prf ([], [], [])); |
12233 | 1158 |
val head = (case strip_combt (fst (strip_combP prf)) of |
15531 | 1159 |
(PThm ((old_name, _), prf', prop', NONE), args') => |
11519 | 1160 |
if (old_name="" orelse old_name=name) andalso |
1161 |
prop = prop' andalso args = args' then |
|
15531 | 1162 |
PThm ((name, tags), prf', prop, NONE) |
11519 | 1163 |
else |
15531 | 1164 |
PThm ((name, tags), opt_prf, prop, NONE) |
1165 |
| _ => PThm ((name, tags), opt_prf, prop, NONE)) |
|
11519 | 1166 |
in |
12923 | 1167 |
proof_combP (proof_combt' (head, args), map Hyp hyps) |
11519 | 1168 |
end; |
1169 |
||
12923 | 1170 |
fun get_name_tags hyps prop prf = |
1171 |
let val prop = Logic.list_implies (hyps, prop) in |
|
1172 |
(case strip_combt (fst (strip_combP prf)) of |
|
11519 | 1173 |
(PThm ((name, tags), _, prop', _), _) => |
1174 |
if prop=prop' then (name, tags) else ("", []) |
|
1175 |
| (PAxm (name, prop', _), _) => |
|
1176 |
if prop=prop' then (name, []) else ("", []) |
|
12923 | 1177 |
| _ => ("", [])) |
1178 |
end; |
|
11519 | 1179 |
|
1180 |
end; |
|
1181 |
||
1182 |
structure BasicProofterm : BASIC_PROOFTERM = Proofterm; |
|
1183 |
open BasicProofterm; |