src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/Operator_Norm.thy

remove redundant lemma Lim_sequentially in favor of lemma LIMSEQ_def

(*  Title:      HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/Operator_Norm.thy
    Author:     Amine Chaieb, University of Cambridge
*)

header {* Operator Norm *}

theory Operator_Norm
imports Linear_Algebra
begin

definition "onorm f = Sup {norm (f x)| x. norm x = 1}"

lemma norm_bound_generalize:
  fixes f:: "'a::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::euclidean_space"
  assumes lf: "linear f"
  shows "(\<forall>x. norm x = 1 \<longrightarrow> norm (f x) \<le> b) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x)" (is "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?rhs")
proof-
  {assume H: ?rhs
    {fix x :: "'a" assume x: "norm x = 1"
      from H[rule_format, of x] x have "norm (f x) \<le> b" by simp}
    then have ?lhs by blast }

  moreover
  {assume H: ?lhs
    have bp: "b \<ge> 0" apply-apply(rule order_trans [OF norm_ge_zero])
      apply(rule H[rule_format, of "basis 0::'a"]) by auto 
    {fix x :: "'a"
      {assume "x = 0"
        then have "norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x" by (simp add: linear_0[OF lf] bp)}
      moreover
      {assume x0: "x \<noteq> 0"
        hence n0: "norm x \<noteq> 0" by (metis norm_eq_zero)
        let ?c = "1/ norm x"
        have "norm (?c *\<^sub>R x) = 1" using x0 by (simp add: n0)
        with H have "norm (f (?c *\<^sub>R x)) \<le> b" by blast
        hence "?c * norm (f x) \<le> b"
          by (simp add: linear_cmul[OF lf])
        hence "norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x"
          using n0 norm_ge_zero[of x] by (auto simp add: field_simps)}
      ultimately have "norm (f x) \<le> b * norm x" by blast}
    then have ?rhs by blast}
  ultimately show ?thesis by blast
qed
 
lemma onorm:
  fixes f:: "'a::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::euclidean_space"
  assumes lf: "linear f"
  shows "norm (f x) <= onorm f * norm x"
  and "\<forall>x. norm (f x) <= b * norm x \<Longrightarrow> onorm f <= b"
proof-
  {
    let ?S = "{norm (f x) |x. norm x = 1}"
    have "norm (f (basis 0)) \<in> ?S" unfolding mem_Collect_eq
      apply(rule_tac x="basis 0" in exI) by auto
    hence Se: "?S \<noteq> {}" by auto
    from linear_bounded[OF lf] have b: "\<exists> b. ?S *<= b"
      unfolding norm_bound_generalize[OF lf, symmetric] by (auto simp add: setle_def)
    {from Sup[OF Se b, unfolded onorm_def[symmetric]]
      show "norm (f x) <= onorm f * norm x"
        apply -
        apply (rule spec[where x = x])
        unfolding norm_bound_generalize[OF lf, symmetric]
        by (auto simp add: isLub_def isUb_def leastP_def setge_def setle_def)}
    {
      show "\<forall>x. norm (f x) <= b * norm x \<Longrightarrow> onorm f <= b"
        using Sup[OF Se b, unfolded onorm_def[symmetric]]
        unfolding norm_bound_generalize[OF lf, symmetric]
        by (auto simp add: isLub_def isUb_def leastP_def setge_def setle_def)}
  }
qed

lemma onorm_pos_le: assumes lf: "linear (f::'n::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'm::euclidean_space)" shows "0 <= onorm f"
  using order_trans[OF norm_ge_zero onorm(1)[OF lf, of "basis 0"]] 
  using DIM_positive[where 'a='n] by auto

lemma onorm_eq_0: assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::euclidean_space)"
  shows "onorm f = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. f x = 0)"
  using onorm[OF lf]
  apply (auto simp add: onorm_pos_le)
  apply atomize
  apply (erule allE[where x="0::real"])
  using onorm_pos_le[OF lf]
  apply arith
  done

lemma onorm_const: "onorm(\<lambda>x::'a::euclidean_space. (y::'b::euclidean_space)) = norm y"
proof-
  let ?f = "\<lambda>x::'a. (y::'b)"
  have th: "{norm (?f x)| x. norm x = 1} = {norm y}"
    apply safe apply(rule_tac x="basis 0" in exI) by auto
  show ?thesis
    unfolding onorm_def th
    apply (rule Sup_unique) by (simp_all  add: setle_def)
qed

lemma onorm_pos_lt: assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::euclidean_space)"
  shows "0 < onorm f \<longleftrightarrow> ~(\<forall>x. f x = 0)"
  unfolding onorm_eq_0[OF lf, symmetric]
  using onorm_pos_le[OF lf] by arith

lemma onorm_compose:
  assumes lf: "linear (f::'n::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'm::euclidean_space)"
  and lg: "linear (g::'k::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'n::euclidean_space)"
  shows "onorm (f o g) <= onorm f * onorm g"
  apply (rule onorm(2)[OF linear_compose[OF lg lf], rule_format])
  unfolding o_def
  apply (subst mult_assoc)
  apply (rule order_trans)
  apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lf])
  apply (rule mult_left_mono)
  apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lg])
  apply (rule onorm_pos_le[OF lf])
  done

lemma onorm_neg_lemma: assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::euclidean_space)"
  shows "onorm (\<lambda>x. - f x) \<le> onorm f"
  using onorm[OF linear_compose_neg[OF lf]] onorm[OF lf]
  unfolding norm_minus_cancel by metis

lemma onorm_neg: assumes lf: "linear (f::'a::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::euclidean_space)"
  shows "onorm (\<lambda>x. - f x) = onorm f"
  using onorm_neg_lemma[OF lf] onorm_neg_lemma[OF linear_compose_neg[OF lf]]
  by simp

lemma onorm_triangle:
  assumes lf: "linear (f::'n::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'm::euclidean_space)" and lg: "linear g"
  shows "onorm (\<lambda>x. f x + g x) <= onorm f + onorm g"
  apply(rule onorm(2)[OF linear_compose_add[OF lf lg], rule_format])
  apply (rule order_trans)
  apply (rule norm_triangle_ineq)
  apply (simp add: distrib)
  apply (rule add_mono)
  apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lf])
  apply (rule onorm(1)[OF lg])
  done

lemma onorm_triangle_le: "linear (f::'n::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'm::euclidean_space) \<Longrightarrow> linear g \<Longrightarrow> onorm(f) + onorm(g) <= e
  \<Longrightarrow> onorm(\<lambda>x. f x + g x) <= e"
  apply (rule order_trans)
  apply (rule onorm_triangle)
  apply assumption+
  done

lemma onorm_triangle_lt: "linear (f::'n::euclidean_space \<Rightarrow> 'm::euclidean_space) \<Longrightarrow> linear g \<Longrightarrow> onorm(f) + onorm(g) < e
  ==> onorm(\<lambda>x. f x + g x) < e"
  apply (rule order_le_less_trans)
  apply (rule onorm_triangle)
  by assumption+

end