src/HOL/Analysis/Abstract_Topology_2.thy

cosmetic improvements, new lemmas, especially more uses of function space

(*  Author:     L C Paulson, University of Cambridge
    Author:     Amine Chaieb, University of Cambridge
    Author:     Robert Himmelmann, TU Muenchen
    Author:     Brian Huffman, Portland State University
*)

section \<open>Abstract Topology 2\<close>

theory Abstract_Topology_2
  imports
    Elementary_Topology Abstract_Topology Continuum_Not_Denumerable
    "HOL-Library.Indicator_Function"
    "HOL-Library.Equipollence"
begin

text \<open>Combination of Elementary and Abstract Topology\<close>

lemma approachable_lt_le2: 
    "(\<exists>(d::real) > 0. \<forall>x. Q x \<longrightarrow> f x < d \<longrightarrow> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>d>0. \<forall>x. f x \<le> d \<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> P x)"
by (meson dense less_eq_real_def order_le_less_trans)

lemma triangle_lemma:
  fixes x y z :: real
  assumes x: "0 \<le> x"
    and y: "0 \<le> y"
    and z: "0 \<le> z"
    and xy: "x\<^sup>2 \<le> y\<^sup>2 + z\<^sup>2"
  shows "x \<le> y + z"
proof -
  have "y\<^sup>2 + z\<^sup>2 \<le> y\<^sup>2 + 2 * y * z + z\<^sup>2"
    using z y by simp
  with xy have th: "x\<^sup>2 \<le> (y + z)\<^sup>2"
    by (simp add: power2_eq_square field_simps)
  from y z have yz: "y + z \<ge> 0"
    by arith
  from power2_le_imp_le[OF th yz] show ?thesis .
qed

lemma isCont_indicator:
  fixes x :: "'a::t2_space"
  shows "isCont (indicator A :: 'a \<Rightarrow> real) x = (x \<notin> frontier A)"
proof auto
  fix x
  assume cts_at: "isCont (indicator A :: 'a \<Rightarrow> real) x" and fr: "x \<in> frontier A"
  with continuous_at_open have 1: "\<forall>V::real set. open V \<and> indicator A x \<in> V \<longrightarrow>
    (\<exists>U::'a set. open U \<and> x \<in> U \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>U. indicator A y \<in> V))" by auto
  show False
  proof (cases "x \<in> A")
    assume x: "x \<in> A"
    hence "indicator A x \<in> ({0<..<2} :: real set)" by simp
    with 1 obtain U where U: "open U" "x \<in> U" "\<forall>y\<in>U. indicator A y \<in> ({0<..<2} :: real set)"
      using open_greaterThanLessThan by metis
    hence "\<forall>y\<in>U. indicator A y > (0::real)"
      unfolding greaterThanLessThan_def by auto
    hence "U \<subseteq> A" using indicator_eq_0_iff by force
    hence "x \<in> interior A" using U interiorI by auto
    thus ?thesis using fr unfolding frontier_def by simp
  next
    assume x: "x \<notin> A"
    hence "indicator A x \<in> ({-1<..<1} :: real set)" by simp
    with 1 obtain U where U: "open U" "x \<in> U" "\<forall>y\<in>U. indicator A y \<in> ({-1<..<1} :: real set)"
      using 1 open_greaterThanLessThan by metis
    hence "\<forall>y\<in>U. indicator A y < (1::real)"
      unfolding greaterThanLessThan_def by auto
    hence "U \<subseteq> -A" by auto
    hence "x \<in> interior (-A)" using U interiorI by auto
    thus ?thesis using fr interior_complement unfolding frontier_def by auto
  qed
next
  assume nfr: "x \<notin> frontier A"
  hence "x \<in> interior A \<or> x \<in> interior (-A)"
    by (auto simp: frontier_def closure_interior)
  thus "isCont ((indicator A)::'a \<Rightarrow> real) x"
  proof
    assume int: "x \<in> interior A"
    then obtain U where U: "open U" "x \<in> U" "U \<subseteq> A" unfolding interior_def by auto
    hence "\<forall>y\<in>U. indicator A y = (1::real)" unfolding indicator_def by auto
    hence "continuous_on U (indicator A)" by (simp add: indicator_eq_1_iff)
    thus ?thesis using U continuous_on_eq_continuous_at by auto
  next
    assume ext: "x \<in> interior (-A)"
    then obtain U where U: "open U" "x \<in> U" "U \<subseteq> -A" unfolding interior_def by auto
    then have "continuous_on U (indicator A)"
      using continuous_on_topological by (auto simp: subset_iff)
    thus ?thesis using U continuous_on_eq_continuous_at by auto
  qed
qed

lemma islimpt_closure:
  "\<lbrakk>S \<subseteq> T; \<And>x. \<lbrakk>x islimpt S; x \<in> T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> S = T \<inter> closure S"
  using closure_def by fastforce

lemma closedin_limpt:
  "closedin (top_of_set T) S \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<and> (\<forall>x. x islimpt S \<and> x \<in> T \<longrightarrow> x \<in> S)"
proof -
  have "\<And>U x. \<lbrakk>closed U; S = T \<inter> U; x islimpt S; x \<in> T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S"
    by (meson IntI closed_limpt inf_le2 islimpt_subset)
  then show ?thesis
    by (metis closed_closure closedin_closed closedin_imp_subset islimpt_closure)
qed

lemma closedin_closed_eq: "closed S \<Longrightarrow> closedin (top_of_set S) T \<longleftrightarrow> closed T \<and> T \<subseteq> S"
  by (meson closedin_limpt closed_subset closedin_closed_trans)

lemma connected_closed_set:
   "closed S
    \<Longrightarrow> connected S \<longleftrightarrow> (\<nexists>A B. closed A \<and> closed B \<and> A \<noteq> {} \<and> B \<noteq> {} \<and> A \<union> B = S \<and> A \<inter> B = {})"
  unfolding connected_closedin_eq closedin_closed_eq connected_closedin_eq by blast

text \<open>If a connnected set is written as the union of two nonempty closed sets, 
  then these sets have to intersect.\<close>

lemma connected_as_closed_union:
  assumes "connected C" "C = A \<union> B" "closed A" "closed B" "A \<noteq> {}" "B \<noteq> {}"
  shows "A \<inter> B \<noteq> {}"
by (metis assms closed_Un connected_closed_set)

lemma closedin_subset_trans:
  "closedin (top_of_set U) S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> U \<Longrightarrow>
    closedin (top_of_set T) S"
  by (meson closedin_limpt subset_iff)

lemma openin_subset_trans:
  "openin (top_of_set U) S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T \<Longrightarrow> T \<subseteq> U \<Longrightarrow>
    openin (top_of_set T) S"
  by (auto simp: openin_open)

lemma closedin_compact:
   "\<lbrakk>compact S; closedin (top_of_set S) T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> compact T"
by (metis closedin_closed compact_Int_closed)

lemma closedin_compact_eq:
  fixes S :: "'a::t2_space set"
  shows "compact S \<Longrightarrow> (closedin (top_of_set S) T \<longleftrightarrow> compact T \<and> T \<subseteq> S)"
by (metis closedin_imp_subset closedin_compact closed_subset compact_imp_closed)


subsection \<open>Closure\<close>

lemma euclidean_closure_of [simp]: "euclidean closure_of S = closure S"
  by (auto simp: closure_of_def closure_def islimpt_def)

lemma closure_openin_Int_closure:
  assumes ope: "openin (top_of_set U) S" and "T \<subseteq> U"
  shows "closure(S \<inter> closure T) = closure(S \<inter> T)"
proof
  obtain V where "open V" and S: "S = U \<inter> V"
    using ope using openin_open by metis
  show "closure (S \<inter> closure T) \<subseteq> closure (S \<inter> T)"
    proof (clarsimp simp: S)
      fix x
      assume  "x \<in> closure (U \<inter> V \<inter> closure T)"
      then have "V \<inter> closure T \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> closure A" for A
          by (metis closure_mono subsetD inf.coboundedI2 inf_assoc)
      then have "x \<in> closure (T \<inter> V)"
         by (metis \<open>open V\<close> closure_closure inf_commute open_Int_closure_subset)
      then show "x \<in> closure (U \<inter> V \<inter> T)"
        by (metis \<open>T \<subseteq> U\<close> inf.absorb_iff2 inf_assoc inf_commute)
    qed
next
  show "closure (S \<inter> T) \<subseteq> closure (S \<inter> closure T)"
    by (meson Int_mono closure_mono closure_subset order_refl)
qed

corollary infinite_openin:
  fixes S :: "'a :: t1_space set"
  shows "\<lbrakk>openin (top_of_set U) S; x \<in> S; x islimpt U\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> infinite S"
  by (clarsimp simp add: openin_open islimpt_eq_acc_point inf_commute)

lemma closure_Int_ballI:
  assumes "\<And>U. \<lbrakk>openin (top_of_set S) U; U \<noteq> {}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> T \<inter> U \<noteq> {}"
  shows "S \<subseteq> closure T"
proof (clarsimp simp: closure_iff_nhds_not_empty)
  fix x and A and V
  assume "x \<in> S" "V \<subseteq> A" "open V" "x \<in> V" "T \<inter> A = {}"
  then have "openin (top_of_set S) (A \<inter> V \<inter> S)"
    by (simp add: inf_absorb2 openin_subtopology_Int)
  moreover have "A \<inter> V \<inter> S \<noteq> {}" using \<open>x \<in> V\<close> \<open>V \<subseteq> A\<close> \<open>x \<in> S\<close>
    by auto
  ultimately show False
    using \<open>T \<inter> A = {}\<close> assms by fastforce
qed


subsection \<open>Frontier\<close>

lemma euclidean_interior_of [simp]: "euclidean interior_of S = interior S"
  by (auto simp: interior_of_def interior_def)

lemma euclidean_frontier_of [simp]: "euclidean frontier_of S = frontier S"
  by (auto simp: frontier_of_def frontier_def)

lemma connected_Int_frontier:
     "\<lbrakk>connected S; S \<inter> T \<noteq> {}; S - T \<noteq> {}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> S \<inter> frontier T \<noteq> {}"
  apply (simp add: frontier_interiors connected_openin, safe)
  apply (drule_tac x="S \<inter> interior T" in spec, safe)
   apply (drule_tac [2] x="S \<inter> interior (-T)" in spec)
   apply (auto simp: disjoint_eq_subset_Compl dest: interior_subset [THEN subsetD])
  done

subsection \<open>Compactness\<close>

lemma openin_delete:
  fixes a :: "'a :: t1_space"
  shows "openin (top_of_set u) S \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set u) (S - {a})"
by (metis Int_Diff open_delete openin_open)

lemma compact_eq_openin_cover:
  "compact S \<longleftrightarrow>
    (\<forall>C. (\<forall>c\<in>C. openin (top_of_set S) c) \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>C \<longrightarrow>
      (\<exists>D\<subseteq>C. finite D \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>D))"
proof safe
  fix C
  assume "compact S" and "\<forall>c\<in>C. openin (top_of_set S) c" and "S \<subseteq> \<Union>C"
  then have "\<forall>c\<in>{T. open T \<and> S \<inter> T \<in> C}. open c" and "S \<subseteq> \<Union>{T. open T \<and> S \<inter> T \<in> C}"
    unfolding openin_open by force+
  with \<open>compact S\<close> obtain D where "D \<subseteq> {T. open T \<and> S \<inter> T \<in> C}" and "finite D" and "S \<subseteq> \<Union>D"
    by (meson compactE)
  then have "image (\<lambda>T. S \<inter> T) D \<subseteq> C \<and> finite (image (\<lambda>T. S \<inter> T) D) \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>(image (\<lambda>T. S \<inter> T) D)"
    by auto
  then show "\<exists>D\<subseteq>C. finite D \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>D" ..
next
  assume 1: "\<forall>C. (\<forall>c\<in>C. openin (top_of_set S) c) \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>C \<longrightarrow>
        (\<exists>D\<subseteq>C. finite D \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>D)"
  show "compact S"
  proof (rule compactI)
    fix C
    let ?C = "image (\<lambda>T. S \<inter> T) C"
    assume "\<forall>t\<in>C. open t" and "S \<subseteq> \<Union>C"
    then have "(\<forall>c\<in>?C. openin (top_of_set S) c) \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>?C"
      unfolding openin_open by auto
    with 1 obtain D where "D \<subseteq> ?C" and "finite D" and "S \<subseteq> \<Union>D"
      by metis
    let ?D = "inv_into C (\<lambda>T. S \<inter> T) ` D"
    have "?D \<subseteq> C \<and> finite ?D \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>?D"
    proof (intro conjI)
      from \<open>D \<subseteq> ?C\<close> show "?D \<subseteq> C"
        by (fast intro: inv_into_into)
      from \<open>finite D\<close> show "finite ?D"
        by (rule finite_imageI)
      from \<open>S \<subseteq> \<Union>D\<close> show "S \<subseteq> \<Union>?D"
        by (metis \<open>D \<subseteq> (\<inter>) S ` C\<close> image_inv_into_cancel inf_Sup le_infE)
    qed
    then show "\<exists>D\<subseteq>C. finite D \<and> S \<subseteq> \<Union>D" ..
  qed
qed


subsection \<open>Continuity\<close>

lemma interior_image_subset:
  assumes "inj f" "\<And>x. continuous (at x) f"
  shows "interior (f ` S) \<subseteq> f ` (interior S)"
proof
  fix x assume "x \<in> interior (f ` S)"
  then obtain T where as: "open T" "x \<in> T" "T \<subseteq> f ` S" ..
  then have "x \<in> f ` S" by auto
  then obtain y where y: "y \<in> S" "x = f y" by auto
  have "open (f -` T)"
    using assms \<open>open T\<close> by (simp add: continuous_at_imp_continuous_on open_vimage)
  moreover have "y \<in> vimage f T"
    using \<open>x = f y\<close> \<open>x \<in> T\<close> by simp
  moreover have "vimage f T \<subseteq> S"
    using \<open>T \<subseteq> image f S\<close> \<open>inj f\<close> unfolding inj_on_def subset_eq by auto
  ultimately have "y \<in> interior S" ..
  with \<open>x = f y\<close> show "x \<in> f ` interior S" ..
qed

subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close> \<open>Equality of continuous functions on closure and related results\<close>

lemma continuous_closedin_preimage_constant:
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'b::t1_space"
  shows "continuous_on S f \<Longrightarrow> closedin (top_of_set S) {x \<in> S. f x = a}"
  using continuous_closedin_preimage[of S f "{a}"] by (simp add: vimage_def Collect_conj_eq)

lemma continuous_closed_preimage_constant:
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'b::t1_space"
  shows "continuous_on S f \<Longrightarrow> closed S \<Longrightarrow> closed {x \<in> S. f x = a}"
  using continuous_closed_preimage[of S f "{a}"] by (simp add: vimage_def Collect_conj_eq)

lemma continuous_constant_on_closure:
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'b::t1_space"
  assumes "continuous_on (closure S) f"
      and "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> f x = a"
      and "x \<in> closure S"
  shows "f x = a"
    using continuous_closed_preimage_constant[of "closure S" f a]
      assms closure_minimal[of S "{x \<in> closure S. f x = a}"] closure_subset
    unfolding subset_eq
    by auto

lemma image_closure_subset:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on (closure S) f"
    and "closed T"
    and "(f ` S) \<subseteq> T"
  shows "f ` (closure S) \<subseteq> T"
proof -
  have "S \<subseteq> {x \<in> closure S. f x \<in> T}"
    using assms(3) closure_subset by auto
  moreover have "closed (closure S \<inter> f -` T)"
    using continuous_closed_preimage[OF contf] \<open>closed T\<close> by auto
  ultimately have "closure S = (closure S \<inter> f -` T)"
    using closure_minimal[of S "(closure S \<inter> f -` T)"] by auto
  then show ?thesis by auto
qed

subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close> \<open>A function constant on a set\<close>

definition constant_on  (infixl "(constant'_on)" 50)
  where "f constant_on A \<equiv> \<exists>y. \<forall>x\<in>A. f x = y"

lemma constant_on_subset: "\<lbrakk>f constant_on A; B \<subseteq> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f constant_on B"
  unfolding constant_on_def by blast

lemma injective_not_constant:
  fixes S :: "'a::{perfect_space} set"
  shows "\<lbrakk>open S; inj_on f S; f constant_on S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> S = {}"
  unfolding constant_on_def
  by (metis equals0I inj_on_contraD islimpt_UNIV islimpt_def)

lemma constant_on_compose:
  assumes "f constant_on A"
  shows   "g \<circ> f constant_on A"
  using assms by (auto simp: constant_on_def)

lemma not_constant_onI:
  "f x \<noteq> f y \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> y \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> \<not>f constant_on A"
  unfolding constant_on_def by metis

lemma constant_onE:
  assumes "f constant_on S" and "\<And>x. x\<in>S \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
  shows "g constant_on S"
  using assms unfolding constant_on_def by simp

lemma constant_on_closureI:
  fixes f :: "_ \<Rightarrow> 'b::t1_space"
  assumes cof: "f constant_on S" and contf: "continuous_on (closure S) f"
  shows "f constant_on (closure S)"
  using continuous_constant_on_closure [OF contf] cof unfolding constant_on_def
  by metis


subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close> \<open>Continuity relative to a union.\<close>

lemma continuous_on_Un_local:
    "\<lbrakk>closedin (top_of_set (S \<union> T)) S; closedin (top_of_set (S \<union> T)) T;
      continuous_on S f; continuous_on T f\<rbrakk>
     \<Longrightarrow> continuous_on (S \<union> T) f"
  unfolding continuous_on closedin_limpt
  by (metis Lim_trivial_limit Lim_within_Un Un_iff trivial_limit_within)

lemma continuous_on_cases_local:
     "\<lbrakk>closedin (top_of_set (S \<union> T)) S; closedin (top_of_set (S \<union> T)) T;
       continuous_on S f; continuous_on T g;
       \<And>x. \<lbrakk>x \<in> S \<and> \<not>P x \<or> x \<in> T \<and> P x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x\<rbrakk>
      \<Longrightarrow> continuous_on (S \<union> T) (\<lambda>x. if P x then f x else g x)"
  by (rule continuous_on_Un_local) (auto intro: continuous_on_eq)

lemma continuous_on_cases_le:
  fixes h :: "'a :: topological_space \<Rightarrow> real"
  assumes "continuous_on {x \<in> S. h x \<le> a} f"
      and "continuous_on {x \<in> S. a \<le> h x} g"
      and h: "continuous_on S h"
      and "\<And>x. \<lbrakk>x \<in> S; h x = a\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
    shows "continuous_on S (\<lambda>x. if h x \<le> a then f(x) else g(x))"
proof -
  have S: "S = (S \<inter> h -` atMost a) \<union> (S \<inter> h -` atLeast a)"
    by force
  have 1: "closedin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> h -` atMost a)"
    by (rule continuous_closedin_preimage [OF h closed_atMost])
  have 2: "closedin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> h -` atLeast a)"
    by (rule continuous_closedin_preimage [OF h closed_atLeast])
  have [simp]: "S \<inter> h -` {..a} = {x \<in> S. h x \<le> a}" "S \<inter> h -` {a..} = {x \<in> S. a \<le> h x}"
    by auto
  have "continuous_on (S \<inter> h -` {..a} \<union> S \<inter> h -` {a..}) (\<lambda>x. if h x \<le> a then f x else g x)"
    by (intro continuous_on_cases_local) (use 1 2 S assms in auto)
  then show ?thesis
    using S by force
qed

lemma continuous_on_cases_1:
  fixes S :: "real set"
  assumes "continuous_on {t \<in> S. t \<le> a} f"
      and "continuous_on {t \<in> S. a \<le> t} g"
      and "a \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> f a = g a"
    shows "continuous_on S (\<lambda>t. if t \<le> a then f(t) else g(t))"
using assms
by (auto intro: continuous_on_cases_le [where h = id, simplified])


subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close>\<open>Inverse function property for open/closed maps\<close>

lemma continuous_on_inverse_open_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f"
    and imf: "f ` S = T"
    and injf: "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> g (f x) = x"
    and oo: "\<And>U. openin (top_of_set S) U \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
  shows "continuous_on T g"
proof -
  from imf injf have gTS: "g ` T = S"
    by force
  from imf injf have fU: "U \<subseteq> S \<Longrightarrow> (f ` U) = T \<inter> g -` U" for U
    by force
  show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_on_open [of T g] gTS) (metis openin_imp_subset fU oo)
qed

lemma continuous_on_inverse_closed_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f"
    and imf: "f ` S = T"
    and injf: "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> g(f x) = x"
    and oo: "\<And>U. closedin (top_of_set S) U \<Longrightarrow> closedin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
  shows "continuous_on T g"
proof -
  from imf injf have gTS: "g ` T = S"
    by force
  from imf injf have fU: "U \<subseteq> S \<Longrightarrow> (f ` U) = T \<inter> g -` U" for U
    by force
  show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_on_closed [of T g] gTS) (metis closedin_imp_subset fU oo)
qed

lemma homeomorphism_injective_open_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f"
    and imf: "f ` S = T"
    and injf: "inj_on f S"
    and oo: "\<And>U. openin (top_of_set S) U \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
  obtains g where "homeomorphism S T f g"
proof
  have "continuous_on T (inv_into S f)"
    by (metis contf continuous_on_inverse_open_map imf injf inv_into_f_f oo)
  with imf injf contf show "homeomorphism S T f (inv_into S f)"
    by (auto simp: homeomorphism_def)
qed

lemma homeomorphism_injective_closed_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f"
    and imf: "f ` S = T"
    and injf: "inj_on f S"
    and oo: "\<And>U. closedin (top_of_set S) U \<Longrightarrow> closedin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
  obtains g where "homeomorphism S T f g"
proof
  have "continuous_on T (inv_into S f)"
    by (metis contf continuous_on_inverse_closed_map imf injf inv_into_f_f oo)
  with imf injf contf show "homeomorphism S T f (inv_into S f)"
    by (auto simp: homeomorphism_def)
qed

lemma homeomorphism_imp_open_map:
  assumes hom: "homeomorphism S T f g"
    and oo: "openin (top_of_set S) U"
  shows "openin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
proof -
  from hom oo have [simp]: "f ` U = T \<inter> g -` U"
    using openin_subset by (fastforce simp: homeomorphism_def rev_image_eqI)
  from hom have "continuous_on T g"
    unfolding homeomorphism_def by blast
  moreover have "g ` T = S"
    by (metis hom homeomorphism_def)
  ultimately show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_on_open oo)
qed

lemma homeomorphism_imp_closed_map:
  assumes hom: "homeomorphism S T f g"
    and oo: "closedin (top_of_set S) U"
  shows "closedin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
proof -
  from hom oo have [simp]: "f ` U = T \<inter> g -` U"
    using closedin_subset by (fastforce simp: homeomorphism_def rev_image_eqI)
  from hom have "continuous_on T g"
    unfolding homeomorphism_def by blast
  moreover have "g ` T = S"
    by (metis hom homeomorphism_def)
  ultimately show ?thesis
    by (simp add: continuous_on_closed oo)
qed

subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close> \<open>Seperability\<close>

lemma subset_second_countable:
  obtains \<B> :: "'a:: second_countable_topology set set"
    where "countable \<B>"
          "{} \<notin> \<B>"
          "\<And>C. C \<in> \<B> \<Longrightarrow> openin(top_of_set S) C"
          "\<And>T. openin(top_of_set S) T \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<U>. \<U> \<subseteq> \<B> \<and> T = \<Union>\<U>"
proof -
  obtain \<B> :: "'a set set"
    where "countable \<B>"
      and opeB: "\<And>C. C \<in> \<B> \<Longrightarrow> openin(top_of_set S) C"
      and \<B>:    "\<And>T. openin(top_of_set S) T \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<U>. \<U> \<subseteq> \<B> \<and> T = \<Union>\<U>"
  proof -
    obtain \<C> :: "'a set set"
      where "countable \<C>" and ope: "\<And>C. C \<in> \<C> \<Longrightarrow> open C"
        and \<C>: "\<And>S. open S \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>U. U \<subseteq> \<C> \<and> S = \<Union>U"
      by (metis univ_second_countable that)
    show ?thesis
    proof
      show "countable ((\<lambda>C. S \<inter> C) ` \<C>)"
        by (simp add: \<open>countable \<C>\<close>)
      show "\<And>C. C \<in> (\<inter>) S ` \<C> \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set S) C"
        using ope by auto
      show "\<And>T. openin (top_of_set S) T \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<U>\<subseteq>(\<inter>) S ` \<C>. T = \<Union>\<U>"
        by (metis \<C> image_mono inf_Sup openin_open)
    qed
  qed
  show ?thesis
  proof
    show "countable (\<B> - {{}})"
      using \<open>countable \<B>\<close> by blast
    show "\<And>C. \<lbrakk>C \<in> \<B> - {{}}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set S) C"
      by (simp add: \<open>\<And>C. C \<in> \<B> \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set S) C\<close>)
    show "\<exists>\<U>\<subseteq>\<B> - {{}}. T = \<Union>\<U>" if "openin (top_of_set S) T" for T
      using \<B> [OF that]
      apply clarify
      by (rule_tac x="\<U> - {{}}" in exI, auto)
  qed auto
qed

lemma Lindelof_openin:
  fixes \<F> :: "'a::second_countable_topology set set"
  assumes "\<And>S. S \<in> \<F> \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set U) S"
  obtains \<F>' where "\<F>' \<subseteq> \<F>" "countable \<F>'" "\<Union>\<F>' = \<Union>\<F>"
proof -
  have "\<And>S. S \<in> \<F> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>T. open T \<and> S = U \<inter> T"
    using assms by (simp add: openin_open)
  then obtain tf where tf: "\<And>S. S \<in> \<F> \<Longrightarrow> open (tf S) \<and> (S = U \<inter> tf S)"
    by metis
  have [simp]: "\<And>\<F>'. \<F>' \<subseteq> \<F> \<Longrightarrow> \<Union>\<F>' = U \<inter> \<Union>(tf ` \<F>')"
    using tf by fastforce
  obtain \<G> where "countable \<G> \<and> \<G> \<subseteq> tf ` \<F>" "\<Union>\<G> = \<Union>(tf ` \<F>)"
    using tf by (force intro: Lindelof [of "tf ` \<F>"])
  then obtain \<F>' where \<F>': "\<F>' \<subseteq> \<F>" "countable \<F>'" "\<Union>\<F>' = \<Union>\<F>"
    by (clarsimp simp add: countable_subset_image)
  then show ?thesis ..
qed


subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close>\<open>Closed Maps\<close>

lemma continuous_imp_closed_map:
  fixes f :: "'a::t2_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::t2_space"
  assumes "closedin (top_of_set S) U"
          "continuous_on S f" "f ` S = T" "compact S"
    shows "closedin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
  by (metis assms closedin_compact_eq compact_continuous_image continuous_on_subset subset_image_iff)

lemma closed_map_restrict:
  assumes cloU: "closedin (top_of_set (S \<inter> f -` T')) U"
    and cc: "\<And>U. closedin (top_of_set S) U \<Longrightarrow> closedin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
    and "T' \<subseteq> T"
  shows "closedin (top_of_set T') (f ` U)"
proof -
  obtain V where "closed V" "U = S \<inter> f -` T' \<inter> V"
    using cloU by (auto simp: closedin_closed)
  with cc [of "S \<inter> V"] \<open>T' \<subseteq> T\<close> show ?thesis
    by (fastforce simp add: closedin_closed)
qed

subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close>\<open>Open Maps\<close>

lemma open_map_restrict:
  assumes opeU: "openin (top_of_set (S \<inter> f -` T')) U"
    and oo: "\<And>U. openin (top_of_set S) U \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set T) (f ` U)"
    and "T' \<subseteq> T"
  shows "openin (top_of_set T') (f ` U)"
proof -
  obtain V where "open V" "U = S \<inter> f -` T' \<inter> V"
    using opeU by (auto simp: openin_open)
  with oo [of "S \<inter> V"] \<open>T' \<subseteq> T\<close> show ?thesis
    by (fastforce simp add: openin_open)
qed


subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close>\<open>Quotient maps\<close>

lemma quotient_map_imp_continuous_open:
  assumes T: "f \<in> S \<rightarrow> T"
      and ope: "\<And>U. U \<subseteq> T
              \<Longrightarrow> (openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` U) \<longleftrightarrow>
                   openin (top_of_set T) U)"
    shows "continuous_on S f"
proof -
  have [simp]: "S \<inter> f -` f ` S = S" by auto
  show ?thesis
    by (meson T continuous_on_open_gen ope openin_imp_subset)
qed

lemma quotient_map_imp_continuous_closed:
  assumes T: "f \<in> S \<rightarrow> T"
      and ope: "\<And>U. U \<subseteq> T
                  \<Longrightarrow> (closedin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` U) \<longleftrightarrow>
                       closedin (top_of_set T) U)"
    shows "continuous_on S f"
proof -
  have [simp]: "S \<inter> f -` f ` S = S" by auto
  show ?thesis
    by (meson T closedin_imp_subset continuous_on_closed_gen ope)
qed

lemma open_map_imp_quotient_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f"
      and T: "T \<subseteq> f ` S"
      and ope: "\<And>T. openin (top_of_set S) T
                   \<Longrightarrow> openin (top_of_set (f ` S)) (f ` T)"
    shows "openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` T) =
           openin (top_of_set (f ` S)) T"
proof -
  have "T = f ` (S \<inter> f -` T)"
    using T by blast
  then show ?thesis
    using "ope" contf continuous_on_open by metis
qed

lemma closed_map_imp_quotient_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f"
      and T: "T \<subseteq> f ` S"
      and ope: "\<And>T. closedin (top_of_set S) T
              \<Longrightarrow> closedin (top_of_set (f ` S)) (f ` T)"
    shows "openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` T) \<longleftrightarrow>
           openin (top_of_set (f ` S)) T"
          (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  assume ?lhs
  then have *: "closedin (top_of_set S) (S - (S \<inter> f -` T))"
    using closedin_diff by fastforce
  have [simp]: "(f ` S - f ` (S - (S \<inter> f -` T))) = T"
    using T by blast
  show ?rhs
    using ope [OF *, unfolded closedin_def] by auto
next
  assume ?rhs
  with contf show ?lhs
    by (auto simp: continuous_on_open)
qed

lemma continuous_right_inverse_imp_quotient_map:
  assumes contf: "continuous_on S f" and imf: "f \<in> S \<rightarrow> T"
      and contg: "continuous_on T g" and img: "g \<in> T \<rightarrow> S"
      and fg [simp]: "\<And>y. y \<in> T \<Longrightarrow> f(g y) = y"
      and U: "U \<subseteq> T"
    shows "openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` U) \<longleftrightarrow>
           openin (top_of_set T) U"
          (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof -
  have f: "\<And>Z. openin (top_of_set (f ` S)) Z \<Longrightarrow>
                openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` Z)"
  and  g: "\<And>Z. openin (top_of_set (g ` T)) Z \<Longrightarrow>
                openin (top_of_set T) (T \<inter> g -` Z)"
    using contf contg by (auto simp: continuous_on_open)
  show ?thesis
  proof
    have "T \<inter> g -` (g ` T \<inter> (S \<inter> f -` U)) = {x \<in> T. f (g x) \<in> U}"
      using imf img by blast
    also have "... = U"
      using U by auto
    finally have eq: "T \<inter> g -` (g ` T \<inter> (S \<inter> f -` U)) = U" .
    assume ?lhs
    then have *: "openin (top_of_set (g ` T)) (g ` T \<inter> (S \<inter> f -` U))"
      by (meson img openin_Int openin_subtopology_Int_subset openin_subtopology_self image_subset_iff_funcset)
    show ?rhs
      using g [OF *] eq by auto
  next
    assume rhs: ?rhs
    show ?lhs
      using assms continuous_openin_preimage rhs by blast
  qed
qed

lemma continuous_left_inverse_imp_quotient_map:
  assumes "continuous_on S f"
      and "continuous_on (f ` S) g"
      and  "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> g(f x) = x"
      and "U \<subseteq> f ` S"
    shows "openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` U) \<longleftrightarrow>
           openin (top_of_set (f ` S)) U"
  using assms 
  by (intro continuous_right_inverse_imp_quotient_map) auto

lemma continuous_imp_quotient_map:
  fixes f :: "'a::t2_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::t2_space"
  assumes "continuous_on S f" "f ` S = T" "compact S" "U \<subseteq> T"
    shows "openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> f -` U) \<longleftrightarrow>
           openin (top_of_set T) U"
  by (simp add: assms closed_map_imp_quotient_map continuous_imp_closed_map)

subsection\<^marker>\<open>tag unimportant\<close>\<open>Pasting lemmas for functions, for of casewise definitions\<close>

subsubsection\<open>on open sets\<close>

lemma pasting_lemma:
  assumes ope: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> openin X (T i)"
      and cont: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> continuous_map(subtopology X (T i)) Y (f i)"
      and f: "\<And>i j x. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; j \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i \<inter> T j\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i x = f j x"
      and g: "\<And>x. x \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>j. j \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T j \<and> g x = f j x"
    shows "continuous_map X Y g"
  unfolding continuous_map_openin_preimage_eq
proof (intro conjI allI impI)
  show "g \<in> topspace X \<rightarrow> topspace Y"
    using g cont continuous_map_image_subset_topspace by fastforce
next
  fix U
  assume Y: "openin Y U"
  have T: "T i \<subseteq> topspace X" if "i \<in> I" for i
    using ope by (simp add: openin_subset that)
  have *: "topspace X \<inter> g -` U = (\<Union>i \<in> I. T i \<inter> f i -` U)"
    using f g T by fastforce
  have "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> openin X (T i \<inter> f i -` U)"
    using cont unfolding continuous_map_openin_preimage_eq
    by (metis Y T inf.commute inf_absorb1 ope topspace_subtopology openin_trans_full)
  then show "openin X (topspace X \<inter> g -` U)"
    by (auto simp: *)
qed

lemma pasting_lemma_exists:
  assumes X: "topspace X \<subseteq> (\<Union>i \<in> I. T i)"
      and ope: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> openin X (T i)"
      and cont: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> continuous_map (subtopology X (T i)) Y (f i)"
      and f: "\<And>i j x. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; j \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i \<inter> T j\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i x = f j x"
    obtains g where "continuous_map X Y g" "\<And>x i. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> g x = f i x"
proof
  let ?h = "\<lambda>x. f (SOME i. i \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T i) x"
  show "continuous_map X Y ?h"
    apply (rule pasting_lemma [OF ope cont])
     apply (blast intro: f)+
    by (metis (no_types, lifting) UN_E X subsetD someI_ex)
  show "f (SOME i. i \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T i) x = f i x" if "i \<in> I" "x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i" for i x
    by (metis (no_types, lifting) IntD2 IntI f someI_ex that)
qed

lemma pasting_lemma_locally_finite:
  assumes fin: "\<And>x. x \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>V. openin X V \<and> x \<in> V \<and> finite {i \<in> I. T i \<inter> V \<noteq> {}}"
    and clo: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> closedin X (T i)"
    and cont:  "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> continuous_map(subtopology X (T i)) Y (f i)"
    and f: "\<And>i j x. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; j \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i \<inter> T j\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i x = f j x"
    and g: "\<And>x. x \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>j. j \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T j \<and> g x = f j x"
  shows "continuous_map X Y g"
  unfolding continuous_map_closedin_preimage_eq
proof (intro conjI allI impI)
  show "g \<in> topspace X \<rightarrow> topspace Y"
    using g cont continuous_map_image_subset_topspace by fastforce
next
  fix U
  assume Y: "closedin Y U"
  have T: "T i \<subseteq> topspace X" if "i \<in> I" for i
    using clo by (simp add: closedin_subset that)
  have *: "topspace X \<inter> g -` U = (\<Union>i \<in> I. T i \<inter> f i -` U)"
    using f g T by fastforce
  have cTf: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> closedin X (T i \<inter> f i -` U)"
    using cont unfolding continuous_map_closedin_preimage_eq topspace_subtopology
    by (simp add: Int_absorb1 T Y clo closedin_closed_subtopology)
  have sub: "{Z \<in> (\<lambda>i. T i \<inter> f i -` U) ` I. Z \<inter> V \<noteq> {}}
           \<subseteq> (\<lambda>i. T i \<inter> f i -` U) ` {i \<in> I. T i \<inter> V \<noteq> {}}" for V
    by auto
  have 1: "(\<Union>i\<in>I. T i \<inter> f i -` U) \<subseteq> topspace X"
    using T by blast
  then have "locally_finite_in X ((\<lambda>i. T i \<inter> f i -` U) ` I)"
    unfolding locally_finite_in_def
    using finite_subset [OF sub] fin by force
  then show "closedin X (topspace X \<inter> g -` U)"
    by (smt (verit, best) * cTf closedin_locally_finite_Union image_iff)
qed

subsubsection\<open>Likewise on closed sets, with a finiteness assumption\<close>

lemma pasting_lemma_closed:
  assumes fin: "finite I"
    and clo: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> closedin X (T i)"
    and cont:  "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> continuous_map(subtopology X (T i)) Y (f i)"
    and f: "\<And>i j x. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; j \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i \<inter> T j\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i x = f j x"
    and g: "\<And>x. x \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>j. j \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T j \<and> g x = f j x"
  shows "continuous_map X Y g"
  using pasting_lemma_locally_finite [OF _ clo cont f g] fin by auto

lemma pasting_lemma_exists_locally_finite:
  assumes fin: "\<And>x. x \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>V. openin X V \<and> x \<in> V \<and> finite {i \<in> I. T i \<inter> V \<noteq> {}}"
    and X: "topspace X \<subseteq> \<Union>(T ` I)"
    and clo: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> closedin X (T i)"
    and cont:  "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> continuous_map(subtopology X (T i)) Y (f i)"
    and f: "\<And>i j x. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; j \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i \<inter> T j\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i x = f j x"
    and g: "\<And>x. x \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>j. j \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T j \<and> g x = f j x"
  obtains g where "continuous_map X Y g" "\<And>x i. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> g x = f i x"
proof
  show "continuous_map X Y (\<lambda>x. f(@i. i \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T i) x)"
    apply (rule pasting_lemma_locally_finite [OF fin])
        apply (blast intro: assms)+
    by (metis (no_types, lifting) UN_E X set_rev_mp someI_ex)
next
  fix x i
  assume "i \<in> I" and "x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i"
  then show "f (SOME i. i \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T i) x = f i x"
    by (metis (mono_tags, lifting) IntE IntI f someI2)
qed

lemma pasting_lemma_exists_closed:
  assumes fin: "finite I"
    and X: "topspace X \<subseteq> \<Union>(T ` I)"
    and clo: "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> closedin X (T i)"
    and cont:  "\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> continuous_map(subtopology X (T i)) Y (f i)"
    and f: "\<And>i j x. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; j \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i \<inter> T j\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f i x = f j x"
  obtains g where "continuous_map X Y g" "\<And>x i. \<lbrakk>i \<in> I; x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> g x = f i x"
proof
  show "continuous_map X Y (\<lambda>x. f (SOME i. i \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T i) x)"
    apply (rule pasting_lemma_closed [OF \<open>finite I\<close> clo cont])
     apply (blast intro: f)+
    by (metis (mono_tags, lifting) UN_iff X someI_ex subset_iff)
next
  fix x i
  assume "i \<in> I" "x \<in> topspace X \<inter> T i"
  then show "f (SOME i. i \<in> I \<and> x \<in> T i) x = f i x"
    by (metis (no_types, lifting) IntD2 IntI f someI_ex)
qed

lemma continuous_map_cases:
  assumes f: "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x. P x})) Y f"
      and g: "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x. \<not> P x})) Y g"
      and fg: "\<And>x. x \<in> X frontier_of {x. P x} \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
  shows "continuous_map X Y (\<lambda>x. if P x then f x else g x)"
proof (rule pasting_lemma_closed)
  let ?f = "\<lambda>b. if b then f else g"
  let ?g = "\<lambda>x. if P x then f x else g x"
  let ?T = "\<lambda>b. if b then X closure_of {x. P x} else X closure_of {x. ~P x}"
  show "finite {True,False}" by auto
  have eq: "topspace X - Collect P = topspace X \<inter> {x. \<not> P x}"
    by blast
  show "?f i x = ?f j x"
    if "i \<in> {True,False}" "j \<in> {True,False}" and x: "x \<in> topspace X \<inter> ?T i \<inter> ?T j" for i j x
  proof -
    have "f x = g x" if "i" "\<not> j"
      by (smt (verit, best) Diff_Diff_Int closure_of_interior_of closure_of_restrict eq fg 
          frontier_of_closures interior_of_complement that x)
    moreover
    have "g x = f x"
      if "x \<in> X closure_of {x. \<not> P x}" "x \<in> X closure_of Collect P" "\<not> i" "j" for x
      by (metis IntI closure_of_restrict eq fg frontier_of_closures that)
    ultimately show ?thesis
      using that by (auto simp flip: closure_of_restrict)
  qed
  show "\<exists>j. j \<in> {True,False} \<and> x \<in> ?T j \<and> (if P x then f x else g x) = ?f j x"
    if "x \<in> topspace X" for x
    by simp (metis in_closure_of mem_Collect_eq that)
qed (auto simp: f g)

lemma continuous_map_cases_alt:
  assumes f: "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. P x})) Y f"
      and g: "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. ~P x})) Y g"
      and fg: "\<And>x. x \<in> X frontier_of {x \<in> topspace X. P x} \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
    shows "continuous_map X Y (\<lambda>x. if P x then f x else g x)"
  apply (rule continuous_map_cases)
  using assms
    apply (simp_all add: Collect_conj_eq closure_of_restrict [symmetric] frontier_of_restrict [symmetric])
  done

lemma continuous_map_cases_function:
  assumes contp: "continuous_map X Z p"
    and contf: "continuous_map (subtopology X {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> Z closure_of U}) Y f"
    and contg: "continuous_map (subtopology X {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> Z closure_of (topspace Z - U)}) Y g"
    and fg: "\<And>x. \<lbrakk>x \<in> topspace X; p x \<in> Z frontier_of U\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
  shows "continuous_map X Y (\<lambda>x. if p x \<in> U then f x else g x)"
proof (rule continuous_map_cases_alt)
  show "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> U})) Y f"
  proof (rule continuous_map_from_subtopology_mono)
    let ?T = "{x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> Z closure_of U}"
    show "continuous_map (subtopology X ?T) Y f"
      by (simp add: contf)
    show "X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> U} \<subseteq> ?T"
      by (rule continuous_map_closure_preimage_subset [OF contp])
  qed
  show "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<notin> U})) Y g"
  proof (rule continuous_map_from_subtopology_mono)
    let ?T = "{x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> Z closure_of (topspace Z - U)}"
    show "continuous_map (subtopology X ?T) Y g"
      by (simp add: contg)
    have "X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<notin> U} \<subseteq> X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> topspace Z - U}"
      by (smt (verit) Collect_mono_iff DiffI closure_of_mono continuous_map contp image_subset_iff)
    then show "X closure_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<notin> U} \<subseteq> ?T"
      by (rule order_trans [OF _ continuous_map_closure_preimage_subset [OF contp]])
  qed
next
  show "f x = g x" if "x \<in> X frontier_of {x \<in> topspace X. p x \<in> U}" for x
    using that continuous_map_frontier_frontier_preimage_subset [OF contp, of U] fg by blast
qed

subsection \<open>Retractions\<close>

definition\<^marker>\<open>tag important\<close> retraction :: "('a::topological_space) set \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> bool"
where "retraction S T r \<longleftrightarrow>
  T \<subseteq> S \<and> continuous_on S r \<and> r \<in> S \<rightarrow> T \<and> (\<forall>x\<in>T. r x = x)"

definition\<^marker>\<open>tag important\<close> retract_of (infixl "retract'_of" 50) where
"T retract_of S  \<longleftrightarrow>  (\<exists>r. retraction S T r)"

lemma retraction_idempotent: "retraction S T r \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow>  r (r x) = r x"
  unfolding retraction_def by auto

text \<open>Preservation of fixpoints under (more general notion of) retraction\<close>

lemma invertible_fixpoint_property:
  fixes S :: "'a::topological_space set"
    and T :: "'b::topological_space set"
  assumes contt: "continuous_on T i"
    and "i \<in> T \<rightarrow> S"
    and contr: "continuous_on S r"
    and "r \<in> S \<rightarrow> T"
    and ri: "\<And>y. y \<in> T \<Longrightarrow> r (i y) = y"
    and FP: "\<And>f. \<lbrakk>continuous_on S f; f \<in> S \<rightarrow> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x\<in>S. f x = x"
    and contg: "continuous_on T g"
    and "g \<in> T \<rightarrow> T"
  obtains y where "y \<in> T" and "g y = y"
proof -
  have "\<exists>x\<in>S. (i \<circ> g \<circ> r) x = x"
  proof (rule FP)
    show "continuous_on S (i \<circ> g \<circ> r)"
      by (metis assms(4) assms(8) contg continuous_on_compose continuous_on_subset contr contt funcset_image)
    show "(i \<circ> g \<circ> r) \<in> S \<rightarrow> S"
      using assms(2,4,8) by force
  qed
  then obtain x where x: "x \<in> S" "(i \<circ> g \<circ> r) x = x" ..
  then have *: "g (r x) \<in> T"
    using assms(4,8) by auto
  have "r ((i \<circ> g \<circ> r) x) = r x"
    using x by auto
  then show ?thesis
    using "*" ri that by auto
qed

lemma homeomorphic_fixpoint_property:
  fixes S :: "'a::topological_space set"
    and T :: "'b::topological_space set"
  assumes "S homeomorphic T"
  shows "(\<forall>f. continuous_on S f \<and> f \<in> S \<rightarrow> S \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>S. f x = x)) \<longleftrightarrow>
         (\<forall>g. continuous_on T g \<and> g \<in> T \<rightarrow> T \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>y\<in>T. g y = y))"
         (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof -
  obtain r i where r:
      "\<forall>x\<in>S. i (r x) = x" "r ` S = T" "continuous_on S r"
      "\<forall>y\<in>T. r (i y) = y" "i ` T = S" "continuous_on T i"
    using assms unfolding homeomorphic_def homeomorphism_def  by blast
  show ?thesis
  proof
    assume ?lhs
    with r show ?rhs
      by (smt (verit, del_insts) Pi_iff image_eqI invertible_fixpoint_property[of T i S r])
  next
    assume ?rhs
    with r show ?lhs
      by (smt (verit, del_insts) Pi_iff image_eqI invertible_fixpoint_property[of S r T i])
  qed
qed

lemma retract_fixpoint_property:
  fixes f :: "'a::topological_space \<Rightarrow> 'b::topological_space"
    and S :: "'a set"
  assumes "T retract_of S"
    and FP: "\<And>f. \<lbrakk>continuous_on S f; f \<in> S \<rightarrow> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x\<in>S. f x = x"
    and contg: "continuous_on T g"
    and "g \<in> T \<rightarrow> T"
  obtains y where "y \<in> T" and "g y = y"
proof -
  obtain h where "retraction S T h"
    using assms(1) unfolding retract_of_def ..
  then show ?thesis
    unfolding retraction_def
    using invertible_fixpoint_property[OF continuous_on_id _ _ _ _ FP]
    by (smt (verit, del_insts) Pi_iff assms(4) contg subsetD that)
qed

lemma retraction:
  "retraction S T r \<longleftrightarrow> T \<subseteq> S \<and> continuous_on S r \<and> r ` S = T \<and> (\<forall>x \<in> T. r x = x)"
  by (force simp: retraction_def simp flip: image_subset_iff_funcset)

lemma retractionE: \<comment> \<open>yields properties normalized wrt. simp -- less likely to loop\<close>
  assumes "retraction S T r"
  obtains "T = r ` S" "r \<in> S \<rightarrow> S" "continuous_on S r" "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> r (r x) = r x"
proof (rule that)
  from retraction [of S T r] assms
  have "T \<subseteq> S" "continuous_on S r" "r ` S = T" and "\<forall>x \<in> T. r x = x"
    by simp_all
  then show  "r \<in> S \<rightarrow> S" "continuous_on S r"
    by auto
  then show "T = r ` S"
    using \<open>r ` S = T\<close> by blast
  from \<open>\<forall>x \<in> T. r x = x\<close> have "r x = x" if "x \<in> T" for x
    using that by simp
  with \<open>r ` S = T\<close> show "r (r x) = r x" if "x \<in> S" for x
    using that by auto
qed

lemma retract_ofE: \<comment> \<open>yields properties normalized wrt. simp -- less likely to loop\<close>
  assumes "T retract_of S"
  obtains r where "T = r ` S" "r \<in> S \<rightarrow> S" "continuous_on S r" "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> r (r x) = r x"
proof -
  from assms obtain r where "retraction S T r"
    by (auto simp add: retract_of_def)
  with that show thesis
    by (auto elim: retractionE)
qed

lemma retract_of_imp_extensible:
  assumes "S retract_of T" and "continuous_on S f" and "f \<in> S \<rightarrow> U"
  obtains g where "continuous_on T g" "g \<in> T \<rightarrow> U" "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> g x = f x"
proof -
  from \<open>S retract_of T\<close> obtain r where "retraction T S r"
    by (auto simp add: retract_of_def)
  then have "continuous_on T (f \<circ> r)"
      by (metis assms(2) continuous_on_compose retraction)
  then show thesis
    by (smt (verit, best) Pi_iff \<open>retraction T S r\<close> assms(3) comp_apply retraction_def that)
qed

lemma idempotent_imp_retraction:
  assumes "continuous_on S f" and "f \<in> S \<rightarrow> S" and "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> f(f x) = f x"
    shows "retraction S (f ` S) f"
  by (simp add: assms funcset_image retraction)

lemma retraction_subset:
  assumes "retraction S T r" and "T \<subseteq> S'" and "S' \<subseteq> S"
  shows "retraction S' T r"
  unfolding retraction_def
  by (metis assms continuous_on_subset image_mono image_subset_iff_funcset retraction)

lemma retract_of_subset:
  assumes "T retract_of S" and "T \<subseteq> S'" and "S' \<subseteq> S"
    shows "T retract_of S'"
by (meson assms retract_of_def retraction_subset)

lemma retraction_refl [simp]: "retraction S S (\<lambda>x. x)"
by (simp add: retraction)

lemma retract_of_refl [iff]: "S retract_of S"
  unfolding retract_of_def retraction_def
  using continuous_on_id by blast

lemma retract_of_imp_subset:
   "S retract_of T \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> T"
by (simp add: retract_of_def retraction_def)

lemma retract_of_empty [simp]:
     "({} retract_of S) \<longleftrightarrow> S = {}"  "(S retract_of {}) \<longleftrightarrow> S = {}"
by (auto simp: retract_of_def retraction_def)

lemma retract_of_singleton [iff]: "({x} retract_of S) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> S"
  unfolding retract_of_def retraction_def by force

lemma retraction_comp:
   "\<lbrakk>retraction S T f; retraction T U g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> retraction S U (g \<circ> f)"
  by (smt (verit, best) comp_apply continuous_on_compose image_comp retraction subset_iff)

lemma retract_of_trans [trans]:
  assumes "S retract_of T" and "T retract_of U"
    shows "S retract_of U"
using assms by (auto simp: retract_of_def intro: retraction_comp)

lemma closedin_retract:
  fixes S :: "'a :: t2_space set"
  assumes "S retract_of T"
    shows "closedin (top_of_set T) S"
proof -
  obtain r where r: "S \<subseteq> T" "continuous_on T r" "r \<in> T \<rightarrow> S" "\<And>x. x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> r x = x"
    using assms by (auto simp: retract_of_def retraction_def)
  have "S = {x\<in>T. x = r x}"
    using r by force
  also have "\<dots> = T \<inter> ((\<lambda>x. (x, r x)) -` ({y. \<exists>x. y = (x, x)}))"
    unfolding vimage_def mem_Times_iff fst_conv snd_conv
    using r
    by auto
  also have "closedin (top_of_set T) \<dots>"
    by (rule continuous_closedin_preimage) (auto intro!: closed_diagonal continuous_on_Pair r)
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma closedin_self [simp]: "closedin (top_of_set S) S"
  by simp

lemma retract_of_closed:
    fixes S :: "'a :: t2_space set"
    shows "\<lbrakk>closed T; S retract_of T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> closed S"
  by (metis closedin_retract closedin_closed_eq)

lemma retract_of_compact:
     "\<lbrakk>compact T; S retract_of T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> compact S"
  by (metis compact_continuous_image retract_of_def retraction)

lemma retract_of_connected:
    "\<lbrakk>connected T; S retract_of T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> connected S"
  by (metis Topological_Spaces.connected_continuous_image retract_of_def retraction)

lemma retraction_openin_vimage_iff:
  assumes r: "retraction S T r" and "U \<subseteq> T"
  shows "openin (top_of_set S) (S \<inter> r -` U) \<longleftrightarrow> openin (top_of_set T) U" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  show "?lhs \<Longrightarrow> ?rhs"
    using r
    by (smt (verit, del_insts) assms(2) continuous_right_inverse_imp_quotient_map image_subset_iff_funcset r retractionE retraction_def retraction_subset)
  show "?rhs \<Longrightarrow> ?lhs"
    by (metis continuous_on_open r retraction)
qed

lemma retract_of_Times:
   "\<lbrakk>S retract_of S'; T retract_of T'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (S \<times> T) retract_of (S' \<times> T')"
apply (simp add: retract_of_def retraction_def Sigma_mono, clarify)
apply (rename_tac f g)
apply (rule_tac x="\<lambda>z. ((f \<circ> fst) z, (g \<circ> snd) z)" in exI)
apply (rule conjI continuous_intros | erule continuous_on_subset | force)+
done

subsection\<open>Retractions on a topological space\<close>

definition retract_of_space :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a topology \<Rightarrow> bool" (infix "retract'_of'_space" 50)
  where "S retract_of_space X
         \<equiv> S \<subseteq> topspace X \<and> (\<exists>r. continuous_map X (subtopology X S) r \<and> (\<forall>x \<in> S. r x = x))"

lemma retract_of_space_retraction_maps:
   "S retract_of_space X \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace X \<and> (\<exists>r. retraction_maps X (subtopology X S) r id)"
  by (auto simp: retract_of_space_def retraction_maps_def)

lemma retract_of_space_section_map:
   "S retract_of_space X \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace X \<and> section_map (subtopology X S) X id"
  unfolding retract_of_space_def retraction_maps_def section_map_def
  by (auto simp: continuous_map_from_subtopology)

lemma retract_of_space_imp_subset:
   "S retract_of_space X \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace X"
  by (simp add: retract_of_space_def)

lemma retract_of_space_topspace:
   "topspace X retract_of_space X"
  using retract_of_space_def by force

lemma retract_of_space_empty [simp]:
   "{} retract_of_space X \<longleftrightarrow> topspace X = {}"
  by (auto simp: continuous_map_def retract_of_space_def)

lemma retract_of_space_singleton [simp]:
  "{a} retract_of_space X \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> topspace X"
proof -
  have "continuous_map X (subtopology X {a}) (\<lambda>x. a) \<and> (\<lambda>x. a) a = a" if "a \<in> topspace X"
    using that by simp
  then show ?thesis
    by (force simp: retract_of_space_def)
qed

lemma retract_of_space_trans:
  assumes "S retract_of_space X"  "T retract_of_space subtopology X S"
  shows "T retract_of_space X"
  using assms
  apply (simp add: retract_of_space_retraction_maps)
  by (metis id_comp inf.absorb_iff2 retraction_maps_compose subtopology_subtopology)

lemma retract_of_space_subtopology:
  assumes "S retract_of_space X"  "S \<subseteq> U"
  shows "S retract_of_space subtopology X U"
  using assms
  apply (clarsimp simp: retract_of_space_def)
  by (metis continuous_map_from_subtopology inf.absorb2 subtopology_subtopology)

lemma retract_of_space_clopen:
  assumes "openin X S" "closedin X S" "S = {} \<Longrightarrow> topspace X = {}"
  shows "S retract_of_space X"
proof (cases "S = {}")
  case False
  then obtain a where "a \<in> S"
    by blast
  show ?thesis
    unfolding retract_of_space_def
  proof (intro exI conjI)
    show "S \<subseteq> topspace X"
      by (simp add: assms closedin_subset)
    have "continuous_map X X (\<lambda>x. if x \<in> S then x else a)"
    proof (rule continuous_map_cases)
      show "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x. x \<in> S})) X (\<lambda>x. x)"
        by (simp add: continuous_map_from_subtopology)
      show "continuous_map (subtopology X (X closure_of {x. x \<notin> S})) X (\<lambda>x. a)"
        using \<open>S \<subseteq> topspace X\<close> \<open>a \<in> S\<close> by force
      show "x = a" if "x \<in> X frontier_of {x. x \<in> S}" for x
        using assms that clopenin_eq_frontier_of by fastforce
    qed
    then show "continuous_map X (subtopology X S) (\<lambda>x. if x \<in> S then x else a)"
      using \<open>S \<subseteq> topspace X\<close> \<open>a \<in> S\<close>  by (auto simp: continuous_map_in_subtopology)
  qed auto
qed (use assms in auto)

lemma retract_of_space_disjoint_union:
  assumes "openin X S" "openin X T" and ST: "disjnt S T" "S \<union> T = topspace X" and "S = {} \<Longrightarrow> topspace X = {}"
  shows "S retract_of_space X"
proof (rule retract_of_space_clopen)
  have "S \<inter> T = {}"
    by (meson ST disjnt_def)
  then have "S = topspace X - T"
    using ST by auto
  then show "closedin X S"
    using \<open>openin X T\<close> by blast
qed (auto simp: assms)

lemma retraction_maps_section_image1:
  assumes "retraction_maps X Y r s"
  shows "s ` (topspace Y) retract_of_space X"
  unfolding retract_of_space_section_map
proof
  show "s ` topspace Y \<subseteq> topspace X"
    using assms continuous_map_image_subset_topspace retraction_maps_def by blast
  show "section_map (subtopology X (s ` topspace Y)) X id"
    unfolding section_map_def
    using assms retraction_maps_to_retract_maps by blast
qed

lemma retraction_maps_section_image2:
   "retraction_maps X Y r s
        \<Longrightarrow> subtopology X (s ` (topspace Y)) homeomorphic_space Y"
  using embedding_map_imp_homeomorphic_space homeomorphic_space_sym section_imp_embedding_map
        section_map_def by blast

lemma hereditary_imp_retractive_property:
  assumes "\<And>X S. P X \<Longrightarrow> P(subtopology X S)" 
          "\<And>X X'. X homeomorphic_space X' \<Longrightarrow> (P X \<longleftrightarrow> Q X')"
  assumes "retraction_map X X' r" "P X"
  shows "Q X'"
  by (meson assms retraction_map_def retraction_maps_section_image2)

subsection\<open>Paths and path-connectedness\<close>

definition pathin :: "'a topology \<Rightarrow> (real \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
   "pathin X g \<equiv> continuous_map (subtopology euclideanreal {0..1}) X g"

lemma pathin_compose:
     "\<lbrakk>pathin X g; continuous_map X Y f\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> pathin Y (f \<circ> g)"
   by (simp add: continuous_map_compose pathin_def)

lemma pathin_subtopology:
     "pathin (subtopology X S) g \<longleftrightarrow> pathin X g \<and> (\<forall>x \<in> {0..1}. g x \<in> S)"
  by (auto simp: pathin_def continuous_map_in_subtopology)

lemma pathin_const:
   "pathin X (\<lambda>x. a) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> topspace X"
  by (simp add: pathin_def)
   
lemma path_start_in_topspace: "pathin X g \<Longrightarrow> g 0 \<in> topspace X"
  by (force simp: pathin_def continuous_map)

lemma path_finish_in_topspace: "pathin X g \<Longrightarrow> g 1 \<in> topspace X"
  by (force simp: pathin_def continuous_map)

lemma path_image_subset_topspace: "pathin X g \<Longrightarrow> g \<in> ({0..1}) \<rightarrow> topspace X"
  by (force simp: pathin_def continuous_map)

definition path_connected_space :: "'a topology \<Rightarrow> bool"
  where "path_connected_space X \<equiv> \<forall>x \<in> topspace X. \<forall> y \<in> topspace X. \<exists>g. pathin X g \<and> g 0 = x \<and> g 1 = y"

definition path_connectedin :: "'a topology \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> bool"
  where "path_connectedin X S \<equiv> S \<subseteq> topspace X \<and> path_connected_space(subtopology X S)"

lemma path_connectedin_absolute [simp]:
     "path_connectedin (subtopology X S) S \<longleftrightarrow> path_connectedin X S"
  by (simp add: path_connectedin_def subtopology_subtopology)

lemma path_connectedin_subset_topspace:
     "path_connectedin X S \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> topspace X"
  by (simp add: path_connectedin_def)

lemma path_connectedin_subtopology:
     "path_connectedin (subtopology X S) T \<longleftrightarrow> path_connectedin X T \<and> T \<subseteq> S"
  by (auto simp: path_connectedin_def subtopology_subtopology inf.absorb2)

lemma path_connectedin:
     "path_connectedin X S \<longleftrightarrow>
        S \<subseteq> topspace X \<and>
        (\<forall>x \<in> S. \<forall>y \<in> S. \<exists>g. pathin X g \<and> g \<in> {0..1} \<rightarrow> S \<and> g 0 = x \<and> g 1 = y)"
  unfolding path_connectedin_def path_connected_space_def pathin_def continuous_map_in_subtopology
  by (intro conj_cong refl ball_cong) (simp_all add: inf.absorb_iff2 flip: image_subset_iff_funcset)

lemma path_connectedin_topspace:
     "path_connectedin X (topspace X) \<longleftrightarrow> path_connected_space X"
  by (simp add: path_connectedin_def)

lemma path_connected_imp_connected_space:
  assumes "path_connected_space X"
  shows "connected_space X"
proof -
  have *: "\<exists>S. connectedin X S \<and> g 0 \<in> S \<and> g 1 \<in> S" if "pathin X g" for g
  proof (intro exI conjI)
    have "continuous_map (subtopology euclideanreal {0..1}) X g"
      using connectedin_absolute that by (simp add: pathin_def)
    then show "connectedin X (g ` {0..1})"
      by (rule connectedin_continuous_map_image) auto
  qed auto
  show ?thesis
    using assms
    by (auto intro: * simp add: path_connected_space_def connected_space_subconnected Ball_def)
qed

lemma path_connectedin_imp_connectedin:
     "path_connectedin X S \<Longrightarrow> connectedin X S"
  by (simp add: connectedin_def path_connected_imp_connected_space path_connectedin_def)

lemma path_connected_space_topspace_empty:
     "topspace X = {} \<Longrightarrow> path_connected_space X"
  by (simp add: path_connected_space_def)

lemma path_connectedin_empty [simp]: "path_connectedin X {}"
  by (simp add: path_connectedin)

lemma path_connectedin_singleton [simp]: "path_connectedin X {a} \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> topspace X"
proof
  show "path_connectedin X {a} \<Longrightarrow> a \<in> topspace X"
    by (simp add: path_connectedin)
  show "a \<in> topspace X \<Longrightarrow> path_connectedin X {a}"
    unfolding path_connectedin
    using pathin_const by fastforce
qed

lemma path_connectedin_continuous_map_image:
  assumes f: "continuous_map X Y f" and S: "path_connectedin X S"
  shows "path_connectedin Y (f ` S)"
proof -
  have fX: "f \<in> (topspace X) \<rightarrow> topspace Y"
    using continuous_map_def f by fastforce
  show ?thesis
    unfolding path_connectedin
  proof (intro conjI ballI; clarify?)
    fix x
    assume "x \<in> S"
    show "f x \<in> topspace Y"
      using S \<open>x \<in> S\<close> fX path_connectedin_subset_topspace by fastforce
  next
    fix x y
    assume "x \<in> S" and "y \<in> S"
    then obtain g where g: "pathin X g" "g \<in> {0..1} \<rightarrow> S" "g 0 = x" "g 1 = y"
      using S  by (force simp: path_connectedin)
    show "\<exists>g. pathin Y g \<and> g \<in> {0..1} \<rightarrow> f ` S \<and> g 0 = f x \<and> g 1 = f y"
    proof (intro exI conjI)
      show "pathin Y (f \<circ> g)"
        using \<open>pathin X g\<close> f pathin_compose by auto
    qed (use g in auto)
  qed
qed

lemma path_connectedin_discrete_topology:
  "path_connectedin (discrete_topology U) S \<longleftrightarrow> S \<subseteq> U \<and> (\<exists>a. S \<subseteq> {a})" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  show "?lhs \<Longrightarrow> ?rhs"
    by (meson connectedin_discrete_topology path_connectedin_imp_connectedin)
  show "?rhs \<Longrightarrow> ?lhs"
    using subset_singletonD by fastforce
qed

lemma path_connected_space_discrete_topology:
   "path_connected_space (discrete_topology U) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>a. U \<subseteq> {a})"
  by (metis path_connectedin_discrete_topology path_connectedin_topspace path_connected_space_topspace_empty
            subset_singletonD topspace_discrete_topology)


lemma homeomorphic_path_connected_space_imp:
     "\<lbrakk>path_connected_space X; X homeomorphic_space Y\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> path_connected_space Y"
  unfolding homeomorphic_space_def homeomorphic_maps_def
  by (smt (verit, ccfv_threshold) homeomorphic_imp_surjective_map homeomorphic_maps_def homeomorphic_maps_map path_connectedin_continuous_map_image path_connectedin_topspace)

lemma homeomorphic_path_connected_space:
   "X homeomorphic_space Y \<Longrightarrow> path_connected_space X \<longleftrightarrow> path_connected_space Y"
  by (meson homeomorphic_path_connected_space_imp homeomorphic_space_sym)

lemma homeomorphic_map_path_connectedness:
  assumes "homeomorphic_map X Y f" "U \<subseteq> topspace X"
  shows "path_connectedin Y (f ` U) \<longleftrightarrow> path_connectedin X U"
  unfolding path_connectedin_def
proof (intro conj_cong homeomorphic_path_connected_space)
  show "f ` U \<subseteq> topspace Y \<longleftrightarrow> (U \<subseteq> topspace X)"
    using assms homeomorphic_imp_surjective_map by blast
next
  assume "U \<subseteq> topspace X"
  show "subtopology Y (f ` U) homeomorphic_space subtopology X U"
    using assms unfolding homeomorphic_eq_everything_map
    by (metis (no_types, opaque_lifting) assms homeomorphic_map_subtopologies homeomorphic_space homeomorphic_space_sym image_mono inf.absorb_iff2)
qed

lemma homeomorphic_map_path_connectedness_eq:
   "homeomorphic_map X Y f \<Longrightarrow> path_connectedin X U \<longleftrightarrow> U \<subseteq> topspace X \<and> path_connectedin Y (f ` U)"
  by (meson homeomorphic_map_path_connectedness path_connectedin_def)

subsection\<open>Connected components\<close>

definition connected_component_of :: "'a topology \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
  where "connected_component_of X x y \<equiv>
        \<exists>T. connectedin X T \<and> x \<in> T \<and> y \<in> T"

abbreviation connected_component_of_set
  where "connected_component_of_set X x \<equiv> Collect (connected_component_of X x)"

definition connected_components_of :: "'a topology \<Rightarrow> ('a set) set"
  where "connected_components_of X \<equiv> connected_component_of_set X ` topspace X"

lemma connected_component_in_topspace:
   "connected_component_of X x y \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> topspace X \<and> y \<in> topspace X"
  by (meson connected_component_of_def connectedin_subset_topspace in_mono)

lemma connected_component_of_refl:
   "connected_component_of X x x \<longleftrightarrow> x \<in> topspace X"
  by (meson connected_component_in_topspace connected_component_of_def connectedin_sing insertI1)

lemma connected_component_of_sym:
   "connected_component_of X x y \<longleftrightarrow> connected_component_of X y x"
  by (meson connected_component_of_def)

lemma connected_component_of_trans:
   "\<lbrakk>connected_component_of X x y; connected_component_of X y z\<rbrakk>
        \<Longrightarrow> connected_component_of X x z"
  unfolding connected_component_of_def
  using connectedin_Un by blast

lemma connected_component_of_mono:
   "\<lbrakk>connected_component_of (subtopology X S) x y; S \<subseteq> T\<rbrakk>
        \<Longrightarrow> connected_component_of (subtopology X T) x y"
  by (metis connected_component_of_def connectedin_subtopology inf.absorb_iff2 subtopology_subtopology)

lemma connected_component_of_set:
   "connected_component_of_set X x = {y. \<exists>T. connectedin X T \<and> x \<in> T \<and> y \<in> T}"
  by (meson connected_component_of_def)

lemma connected_component_of_subset_topspace:
   "connected_component_of_set X x \<subseteq> topspace X"
  using connected_component_in_topspace by force

lemma connected_component_of_eq_empty:
   "connected_component_of_set X x = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (x \<notin> topspace X)"
  using connected_component_in_topspace connected_component_of_refl by fastforce

lemma connected_space_iff_connected_component:
   "connected_space X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x \<in> topspace X. \<forall>y \<in> topspace X. connected_component_of X x y)"
  by (simp add: connected_component_of_def connected_space_subconnected)

lemma connected_space_imp_connected_component_of:
   "\<lbrakk>connected_space X; a \<in> topspace X; b \<in> topspace X\<rbrakk>
    \<Longrightarrow> connected_component_of X a b"
  by (simp add: connected_space_iff_connected_component)

lemma connected_space_connected_component_set:
   "connected_space X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x \<in> topspace X. connected_component_of_set X x = topspace X)"
  using connected_component_of_subset_topspace connected_space_iff_connected_component by fastforce

lemma connected_component_of_maximal:
   "\<lbrakk>connectedin X S; x \<in> S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> connected_component_of_set X x"
  by (meson Ball_Collect connected_component_of_def)

lemma connected_component_of_equiv:
   "connected_component_of X x y \<longleftrightarrow>
    x \<in> topspace X \<and> y \<in> topspace X \<and> connected_component_of X x = connected_component_of X y"
  apply (simp add: connected_component_in_topspace fun_eq_iff)
  by (meson connected_component_of_refl connected_component_of_sym connected_component_of_trans)

lemma connected_component_of_disjoint:
   "disjnt (connected_component_of_set X x) (connected_component_of_set X y)
    \<longleftrightarrow> ~(connected_component_of X x y)"
  using connected_component_of_equiv unfolding disjnt_iff by force

lemma connected_component_of_eq:
   "connected_component_of X x = connected_component_of X y \<longleftrightarrow>
        (x \<notin> topspace X) \<and> (y \<notin> topspace X) \<or>
        x \<in> topspace X \<and> y \<in> topspace X \<and>
        connected_component_of X x y"
  by (metis Collect_empty_eq_bot connected_component_of_eq_empty connected_component_of_equiv)

lemma connectedin_connected_component_of:
   "connectedin X (connected_component_of_set X x)"
proof -
  have "connected_component_of_set X x = \<Union> {T. connectedin X T \<and> x \<in> T}"
    by (auto simp: connected_component_of_def)
  then show ?thesis
    by (metis (no_types, lifting) InterI connectedin_Union emptyE mem_Collect_eq)
qed


lemma Union_connected_components_of:
   "\<Union>(connected_components_of X) = topspace X"
  unfolding connected_components_of_def
  using connected_component_in_topspace connected_component_of_refl by fastforce

lemma connected_components_of_maximal:
   "\<lbrakk>C \<in> connected_components_of X; connectedin X S; ~disjnt C S\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> S \<subseteq> C"
  unfolding connected_components_of_def disjnt_def
  apply clarify
  by (metis Int_emptyI connected_component_of_def connected_component_of_trans mem_Collect_eq)

lemma pairwise_disjoint_connected_components_of:
   "pairwise disjnt (connected_components_of X)"
  unfolding connected_components_of_def pairwise_def
  by (smt (verit, best) connected_component_of_disjoint connected_component_of_eq imageE)

lemma complement_connected_components_of_Union:
   "C \<in> connected_components_of X
      \<Longrightarrow> topspace X - C = \<Union> (connected_components_of X - {C})"
  by (metis Union_connected_components_of bot.extremum ccpo_Sup_singleton diff_Union_pairwise_disjoint
      insert_subset pairwise_disjoint_connected_components_of)

lemma nonempty_connected_components_of:
   "C \<in> connected_components_of X \<Longrightarrow> C \<noteq> {}"
  unfolding connected_components_of_def
  by (metis (no_types, lifting) connected_component_of_eq_empty imageE)

lemma connected_components_of_subset:
   "C \<in> connected_components_of X \<Longrightarrow> C \<subseteq> topspace X"
  using Union_connected_components_of by fastforce

lemma connectedin_connected_components_of:
  assumes "C \<in> connected_components_of X"
  shows "connectedin X C"
proof -
  have "C \<in> connected_component_of_set X ` topspace X"
    using assms connected_components_of_def by blast
then show ?thesis
  using connectedin_connected_component_of by fastforce
qed

lemma connected_component_in_connected_components_of:
  "connected_component_of_set X a \<in> connected_components_of X \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> topspace X"
  by (metis (no_types, lifting) connected_component_of_eq_empty connected_components_of_def image_iff)

lemma connected_space_iff_components_eq:
   "connected_space X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>C \<in> connected_components_of X. \<forall>C' \<in> connected_components_of X. C = C')"
          (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof
  show "?lhs \<Longrightarrow> ?rhs"
    by (simp add: connected_components_of_def connected_space_connected_component_set)
  show "?rhs \<Longrightarrow> ?lhs"
    by (metis Union_connected_components_of Union_iff connected_space_subconnected connectedin_connected_components_of)
qed

lemma connected_components_of_eq_empty:
   "connected_components_of X = {} \<longleftrightarrow> topspace X = {}"
  by (simp add: connected_components_of_def)

lemma connected_components_of_empty_space:
   "topspace X = {} \<Longrightarrow> connected_components_of X = {}"
  by (simp add: connected_components_of_eq_empty)

lemma connected_components_of_subset_sing:
   "connected_components_of X \<subseteq> {S} \<longleftrightarrow> connected_space X \<and> (topspace X = {} \<or> topspace X = S)"
proof (cases "topspace X = {}")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    by (simp add: connected_components_of_empty_space connected_space_topspace_empty)
next
  case False
  then have "\<lbrakk>connected_components_of X \<subseteq> {S}\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> topspace X = S"
    by (metis Sup_empty Union_connected_components_of ccpo_Sup_singleton subset_singleton_iff)
  with False show ?thesis
    unfolding connected_components_of_def
    by (metis connected_space_connected_component_set empty_iff image_subset_iff insert_iff)
qed

lemma connected_space_iff_components_subset_singleton:
   "connected_space X \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>a. connected_components_of X \<subseteq> {a})"
  by (simp add: connected_components_of_subset_sing)

lemma connected_components_of_eq_singleton:
   "connected_components_of X = {S}
\<longleftrightarrow> connected_space X \<and> topspace X \<noteq> {} \<and> S = topspace X"
  by (metis ccpo_Sup_singleton connected_components_of_subset_sing insert_not_empty subset_singleton_iff)

lemma connected_components_of_connected_space:
   "connected_space X \<Longrightarrow> connected_components_of X = (if topspace X = {} then {} else {topspace X})"
  by (simp add: connected_components_of_eq_empty connected_components_of_eq_singleton)

lemma exists_connected_component_of_superset:
  assumes "connectedin X S" and ne: "topspace X \<noteq> {}"
  shows "\<exists>C. C \<in> connected_components_of X \<and> S \<subseteq> C"
proof (cases "S = {}")
  case True
  then show ?thesis
    using ne connected_components_of_def by blast
next
  case False
  then show ?thesis
    by (meson all_not_in_conv assms(1) connected_component_in_connected_components_of connected_component_of_maximal connectedin_subset_topspace in_mono)
qed

lemma closedin_connected_components_of:
  assumes "C \<in> connected_components_of X"
  shows   "closedin X C"
proof -
  obtain x where "x \<in> topspace X" and x: "C = connected_component_of_set X x"
    using assms by (auto simp: connected_components_of_def)
  have "connected_component_of_set X x \<subseteq> topspace X"
    by (simp add: connected_component_of_subset_topspace)
  moreover have "X closure_of connected_component_of_set X x \<subseteq> connected_component_of_set X x"
  proof (rule connected_component_of_maximal)
    show "connectedin X (X closure_of connected_component_of_set X x)"
      by (simp add: connectedin_closure_of connectedin_connected_component_of)
    show "x \<in> X closure_of connected_component_of_set X x"
      by (simp add: \<open>x \<in> topspace X\<close> closure_of connected_component_of_refl)
  qed
  ultimately
  show ?thesis
    using closure_of_subset_eq x by auto
qed

lemma closedin_connected_component_of:
   "closedin X (connected_component_of_set X x)"
  by (metis closedin_connected_components_of closedin_empty connected_component_in_connected_components_of connected_component_of_eq_empty)

lemma connected_component_of_eq_overlap:
   "connected_component_of_set X x = connected_component_of_set X y \<longleftrightarrow>
      (x \<notin> topspace X) \<and> (y \<notin> topspace X) \<or>
      ~(connected_component_of_set X x \<inter> connected_component_of_set X y = {})"
  using connected_component_of_equiv by fastforce

lemma connected_component_of_nonoverlap:
   "connected_component_of_set X x \<inter> connected_component_of_set X y = {} \<longleftrightarrow>
     (x \<notin> topspace X) \<or> (y \<notin> topspace X) \<or>
     ~(connected_component_of_set X x = connected_component_of_set X y)"
  by (metis connected_component_of_eq_empty connected_component_of_eq_overlap inf.idem)

lemma connected_component_of_overlap:
   "~(connected_component_of_set X x \<inter> connected_component_of_set X y = {}) \<longleftrightarrow>
    x \<in> topspace X \<and> y \<in> topspace X \<and>
    connected_component_of_set X x = connected_component_of_set X y"
  by (meson connected_component_of_nonoverlap)

subsection\<open>Combining theorems for continuous functions into the reals\<close>

text \<open>The homeomorphism between the real line and the open interval $(-1,1)$\<close>

lemma continuous_map_real_shrink:
  "continuous_map euclideanreal (top_of_set {-1<..<1}) (\<lambda>x. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>))"
proof -
  have "continuous_on UNIV (\<lambda>x::real. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>))"
    by (intro continuous_intros) auto
  then show ?thesis
    by (auto simp: continuous_map_in_subtopology divide_simps)
qed

lemma continuous_on_real_grow:
  "continuous_on {-1<..<1} (\<lambda>x::real. x / (1 - \<bar>x\<bar>))"
  by (intro continuous_intros) auto

lemma real_grow_shrink:
  fixes x::real 
  shows "x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>) / (1 - \<bar>x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>)\<bar>) = x"
  by (force simp: divide_simps)

lemma homeomorphic_maps_real_shrink:
  "homeomorphic_maps euclideanreal (subtopology euclideanreal {-1<..<1}) 
     (\<lambda>x. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>))  (\<lambda>y. y / (1 - \<bar>y\<bar>))"
  by (force simp: homeomorphic_maps_def continuous_map_real_shrink continuous_on_real_grow divide_simps)

lemma real_shrink_Galois:
  fixes x::real
  shows "(x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>) = y) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<bar>y\<bar> < 1 \<and> y / (1 - \<bar>y\<bar>) = x)"
  using real_grow_shrink by (fastforce simp add: distrib_left)

lemma real_shrink_eq:
  fixes x y::real
  shows "(x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>) = y / (1 + \<bar>y\<bar>)) \<longleftrightarrow> x = y"
  by (metis real_shrink_Galois)

lemma real_shrink_lt:
  fixes x::real
  shows "x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>) < y / (1 + \<bar>y\<bar>) \<longleftrightarrow> x < y"
  using zero_less_mult_iff [of x y] by (auto simp: field_simps abs_if not_less)

lemma real_shrink_le:
  fixes x::real
  shows "x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>) \<le> y / (1 + \<bar>y\<bar>) \<longleftrightarrow> x \<le> y"
  by (meson linorder_not_le real_shrink_lt)

lemma real_shrink_grow:
  fixes x::real
  shows "\<bar>x\<bar> < 1 \<Longrightarrow> x / (1 - \<bar>x\<bar>) / (1 + \<bar>x / (1 - \<bar>x\<bar>)\<bar>) = x"
  using real_shrink_Galois by blast

lemma continuous_shrink:
  "continuous_on UNIV (\<lambda>x::real. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>))"
  by (intro continuous_intros) auto

lemma strict_mono_shrink:
  "strict_mono (\<lambda>x::real. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>))"
  by (simp add: monotoneI real_shrink_lt)

lemma shrink_range: "(\<lambda>x::real. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>)) ` S \<subseteq> {-1<..<1}"
  by (auto simp: divide_simps)

text \<open>Note: connected sets of real numbers are the same thing as intervals\<close>
lemma connected_shrink:
  fixes S :: "real set"
  shows "connected ((\<lambda>x. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>)) ` S) \<longleftrightarrow> connected S"  (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
proof 
  assume "?lhs"
  then have "connected ((\<lambda>x. x / (1 - \<bar>x\<bar>)) ` (\<lambda>x. x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>)) ` S)"
    by (metis continuous_on_real_grow shrink_range connected_continuous_image 
               continuous_on_subset)
  then show "?rhs"
    using real_grow_shrink by (force simp add: image_comp)
next
  assume ?rhs
  then show ?lhs
    using connected_continuous_image 
    by (metis continuous_on_subset continuous_shrink subset_UNIV)
qed

subsection \<open>A few cardinality results\<close>

lemma eqpoll_real_subset:
  fixes a b::real
  assumes "a < b" and S: "\<And>x. \<lbrakk>a < x; x < b\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S"
  shows "S \<approx> (UNIV::real set)"
proof (rule lepoll_antisym)
  show "S \<lesssim> (UNIV::real set)"
    by (simp add: subset_imp_lepoll)
  define f where "f \<equiv> \<lambda>x. (a+b) / 2 + (b-a) / 2 * (x / (1 + \<bar>x\<bar>))"
  show "(UNIV::real set) \<lesssim> S"
    unfolding lepoll_def
  proof (intro exI conjI)
    show "inj f"
      unfolding inj_on_def f_def
      by (smt (verit, ccfv_SIG) real_shrink_eq \<open>a<b\<close> divide_eq_0_iff mult_cancel_left times_divide_eq_right)
    have pos: "(b-a) / 2 > 0"
      using \<open>a<b\<close> by auto
    have *: "a < (a + b) / 2 + (b - a) / 2 * x \<longleftrightarrow> (b - a) > (b - a) * -x"
            "(a + b) / 2 + (b - a) / 2 * x < b \<longleftrightarrow> (b - a) * x < (b - a)" for x
      by (auto simp: field_simps)
    show "range f \<subseteq> S"
      using shrink_range [of UNIV] \<open>a < b\<close>
      unfolding subset_iff f_def greaterThanLessThan_iff image_iff
      by (smt (verit, best) S * mult_less_cancel_left2 mult_minus_right)
  qed
qed

lemma reals01_lepoll_nat_sets: "{0..<1::real} \<lesssim> (UNIV::nat set set)"
proof -
  define nxt where "nxt \<equiv> \<lambda>x::real. if x < 1/2 then (True, 2*x) else (False, 2*x - 1)"
  have nxt_fun: "nxt \<in> {0..<1} \<rightarrow> UNIV \<times> {0..<1}"
    by (simp add: nxt_def Pi_iff)
  define \<sigma> where "\<sigma> \<equiv> \<lambda>x. rec_nat (True, x) (\<lambda>n (b,y). nxt y)"
  have \<sigma>Suc [simp]: "\<sigma> x (Suc k) = nxt (snd (\<sigma> x k))" for k x
    by (simp add: \<sigma>_def case_prod_beta')
  have \<sigma>01: "x \<in> {0..<1} \<Longrightarrow> \<sigma> x n \<in> UNIV \<times> {0..<1}" for x n
  proof (induction n)
    case 0
    then show ?case                                           
      by (simp add: \<sigma>_def)
   next
    case (Suc n)
    with nxt_fun show ?case
      by (force simp add: Pi_iff split: prod.split)
  qed
  define f where "f \<equiv> \<lambda>x. {n. fst (\<sigma> x (Suc n))}"
  have snd_nxt: "snd (nxt y) - snd (nxt x) = 2 * (y-x)" 
    if "fst (nxt x) = fst (nxt y)" for x y
    using that by (simp add: nxt_def split: if_split_asm)
  have False if "f x = f y" "x < y" "0 \<le> x" "x < 1" "0 \<le> y" "y < 1" for x y :: real
  proof -
    have "\<And>k. fst (\<sigma> x (Suc k)) = fst (\<sigma> y (Suc k))"
      using that by (force simp add: f_def)
    then have eq: "\<And>k. fst (nxt (snd (\<sigma> x k))) = fst (nxt (snd (\<sigma> y k)))"
      by (metis \<sigma>_def case_prod_beta' rec_nat_Suc_imp)
    have *: "snd (\<sigma> y k) - snd (\<sigma> x k) = 2 ^ k * (y-x)" for k
    proof (induction k)
      case 0
      then show ?case
        by (simp add: \<sigma>_def)
    next
      case (Suc k)
      then show ?case
        by (simp add: eq snd_nxt)
    qed
    define n where "n \<equiv> nat (\<lceil>log 2 (1 / (y - x))\<rceil>)"
    have "2^n \<ge> 1 / (y - x)"
      by (simp add: n_def power_of_nat_log_ge)
    then have "2^n * (y-x) \<ge> 1"
      using \<open>x < y\<close> by (simp add: n_def field_simps)
    with * have "snd (\<sigma> y n) - snd (\<sigma> x n) \<ge> 1"
      by presburger
    moreover have "snd (\<sigma> x n) \<in> {0..<1}" "snd (\<sigma> y n) \<in> {0..<1}"
      using that by (meson \<sigma>01 atLeastLessThan_iff mem_Times_iff)+
    ultimately show False by simp
  qed
  then have "inj_on f {0..<1}"
    by (meson atLeastLessThan_iff linorder_inj_onI')
  then show ?thesis
    unfolding lepoll_def by blast
qed

lemma nat_sets_lepoll_reals01: "(UNIV::nat set set) \<lesssim> {0..<1::real}"
proof -
  define F where "F \<equiv> \<lambda>S i. if i\<in>S then (inverse 3::real) ^ i else 0"
  have Fge0: "F S i \<ge> 0" for S i
    by (simp add: F_def)
  have F: "summable (F S)" for S
    unfolding F_def by (force intro: summable_comparison_test_ev [where g = "power (inverse 3)"])
  have "sum (F S) {..<n} \<le> 3/2" for n S
  proof (cases n)
    case (Suc n')
    have "sum (F S) {..<n} \<le> (\<Sum>i<n. inverse 3 ^ i)"
      by (simp add: F_def sum_mono)
    also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>i=0..n'. inverse 3 ^ i)"
      using Suc atLeast0AtMost lessThan_Suc_atMost by presburger
    also have "\<dots> = (3/2) * (1 - inverse 3 ^ n)"
      using sum_gp_multiplied [of 0 n' "inverse (3::real)"] by (simp add: Suc field_simps)
    also have "\<dots> \<le> 3/2"
      by (simp add: field_simps)
    finally show ?thesis .
  qed auto
  then have F32: "suminf (F S) \<le> 3/2" for S
    using F suminf_le_const by blast
  define f where "f \<equiv> \<lambda>S. suminf (F S) / 2"
  have monoF: "F S n \<le> F T n" if "S \<subseteq> T" for S T n
    using F_def that by auto
  then have monof: "f S \<le> f T" if "S \<subseteq> T" for S T
    using that F by (simp add: f_def suminf_le)
  have "f S \<in> {0..<1::real}" for S
  proof -
    have "0 \<le> suminf (F S)"
      using F by (simp add: F_def suminf_nonneg)
    with F32[of S] show ?thesis
      by (auto simp: f_def)
  qed
  moreover have "inj f"
  proof
    fix S T
    assume "f S = f T" 
    show "S = T"
    proof (rule ccontr)
      assume "S \<noteq> T"
      then have ST_ne: "(S-T) \<union> (T-S) \<noteq> {}"
        by blast
      define n where "n \<equiv> LEAST n. n \<in> (S-T) \<union> (T-S)"
      have sum_split: "suminf (F U) = sum (F U) {..<Suc n} + (\<Sum>k. F U (k + Suc n))"  for U
        by (metis F add.commute suminf_split_initial_segment)
      have yes: "f U \<ge> (sum (F U) {..<n} + (inverse 3::real) ^ n) / 2" 
        if "n \<in> U" for U
      proof -
        have "0 \<le> (\<Sum>k. F U (k + Suc n))"
          by (metis F Fge0 suminf_nonneg summable_iff_shift)
        moreover have "F U n = (1/3) ^ n"
          by (simp add: F_def that)
        ultimately show ?thesis
          by (simp add: sum_split f_def)
      qed
      have *: "(\<Sum>k. F UNIV (k + n)) = (\<Sum>k. F UNIV k) * (inverse 3::real) ^ n" for n
        by (simp add: F_def power_add suminf_mult2)
      have no: "f U < (sum (F U) {..<n} + (inverse 3::real) ^ n) / 2" 
        if "n \<notin> U" for U
      proof -
        have [simp]: "F U n = 0"
          by (simp add: F_def that)
        have "(\<Sum>k. F U (k + Suc n)) \<le> (\<Sum>k. F UNIV (k + Suc n))"
          by (metis F monoF subset_UNIV suminf_le summable_ignore_initial_segment)
        then have "suminf (F U) \<le> (\<Sum>k. F UNIV (k + Suc n)) + (\<Sum>i<n. F U i)"
          by (simp add: sum_split)
        also have "\<dots> < (inverse 3::real) ^ n + (\<Sum>i<n. F U i)"
          unfolding * using F32[of UNIV] by simp
        finally have "suminf (F U) < inverse 3 ^ n + sum (F U) {..<n}" .
        then show ?thesis
          by (simp add: f_def)
      qed
      have "S \<inter> {..<n} = T \<inter> {..<n}"
        using not_less_Least by (fastforce simp add: n_def)
      then have "sum (F S) {..<n} = sum (F T) {..<n}"
        by (metis (no_types, lifting) F_def Int_iff sum.cong)
      moreover consider "n \<in> S-T" | "n \<in> T-S"
        by (metis LeastI_ex ST_ne UnE ex_in_conv n_def)
      ultimately show False
        by (smt (verit, best) Diff_iff \<open>f S = f T\<close> yes no)
    qed
  qed
  ultimately show ?thesis
    by (meson image_subsetI lepoll_def)
qed

lemma open_interval_eqpoll_reals:
  fixes a b::real
  shows "{a<..<b} \<approx> (UNIV::real set) \<longleftrightarrow> a<b"
  using bij_betw_tan bij_betw_open_intervals eqpoll_def
  by (smt (verit, best) UNIV_I eqpoll_real_subset eqpoll_iff_bijections greaterThanLessThan_iff)

lemma closed_interval_eqpoll_reals:
  fixes a b::real
  shows "{a..b} \<approx> (UNIV::real set) \<longleftrightarrow> a < b"
proof
  show "{a..b} \<approx> (UNIV::real set) \<Longrightarrow> a < b"
    using eqpoll_finite_iff infinite_Icc_iff infinite_UNIV_char_0 by blast
qed (auto simp: eqpoll_real_subset)


lemma reals_lepoll_reals01: "(UNIV::real set) \<lesssim> {0..<1::real}"
proof -
  have "(UNIV::real set) \<approx> {0<..<1::real}"
    by (simp add: open_interval_eqpoll_reals eqpoll_sym)
  also have "\<dots> \<lesssim> {0..<1::real}"
    by (simp add: greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_atLeastLessThan_iff subset_imp_lepoll)
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma nat_sets_eqpoll_reals: "(UNIV::nat set set) \<approx> (UNIV::real set)"
  by (metis (mono_tags, opaque_lifting) reals_lepoll_reals01 lepoll_antisym lepoll_trans 
      nat_sets_lepoll_reals01 reals01_lepoll_nat_sets subset_UNIV subset_imp_lepoll)

end