--- a/src/ZF/pair.thy Tue Sep 27 17:03:23 2022 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/pair.thy Tue Sep 27 17:46:52 2022 +0100
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
\<close>
-(** Lemmas for showing that <a,b> uniquely determines a and b **)
+(** Lemmas for showing that \<langle>a,b\<rangle> uniquely determines a and b **)
lemma singleton_eq_iff [iff]: "{a} = {b} \<longleftrightarrow> a=b"
by (rule extension [THEN iff_trans], blast)
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
lemma doubleton_eq_iff: "{a,b} = {c,d} \<longleftrightarrow> (a=c \<and> b=d) | (a=d \<and> b=c)"
by (rule extension [THEN iff_trans], blast)
-lemma Pair_iff [simp]: "<a,b> = <c,d> \<longleftrightarrow> a=c \<and> b=d"
+lemma Pair_iff [simp]: "\<langle>a,b\<rangle> = \<langle>c,d\<rangle> \<longleftrightarrow> a=c \<and> b=d"
by (simp add: Pair_def doubleton_eq_iff, blast)
lemmas Pair_inject = Pair_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjE, elim!]
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
lemmas Pair_inject1 = Pair_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct1]
lemmas Pair_inject2 = Pair_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct2]
-lemma Pair_not_0: "<a,b> \<noteq> 0"
+lemma Pair_not_0: "\<langle>a,b\<rangle> \<noteq> 0"
apply (unfold Pair_def)
apply (blast elim: equalityE)
done
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
declare sym [THEN Pair_neq_0, elim!]
-lemma Pair_neq_fst: "<a,b>=a \<Longrightarrow> P"
+lemma Pair_neq_fst: "\<langle>a,b\<rangle>=a \<Longrightarrow> P"
proof (unfold Pair_def)
assume eq: "{{a, a}, {a, b}} = a"
have "{a, a} \<in> {{a, a}, {a, b}}" by (rule consI1)
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
ultimately show "P" by (rule mem_asym)
qed
-lemma Pair_neq_snd: "<a,b>=b \<Longrightarrow> P"
+lemma Pair_neq_snd: "\<langle>a,b\<rangle>=b \<Longrightarrow> P"
proof (unfold Pair_def)
assume eq: "{{a, a}, {a, b}} = b"
have "{a, b} \<in> {{a, a}, {a, b}}" by blast
@@ -77,10 +77,10 @@
text\<open>Generalizes Cartesian product\<close>
-lemma Sigma_iff [simp]: "<a,b>: Sigma(A,B) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> A \<and> b \<in> B(a)"
+lemma Sigma_iff [simp]: "\<langle>a,b\<rangle>: Sigma(A,B) \<longleftrightarrow> a \<in> A \<and> b \<in> B(a)"
by (simp add: Sigma_def)
-lemma SigmaI [TC,intro!]: "\<lbrakk>a \<in> A; b \<in> B(a)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> <a,b> \<in> Sigma(A,B)"
+lemma SigmaI [TC,intro!]: "\<lbrakk>a \<in> A; b \<in> B(a)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> \<langle>a,b\<rangle> \<in> Sigma(A,B)"
by simp
lemmas SigmaD1 = Sigma_iff [THEN iffD1, THEN conjunct1]
@@ -89,12 +89,12 @@
(*The general elimination rule*)
lemma SigmaE [elim!]:
"\<lbrakk>c \<in> Sigma(A,B);
- \<And>x y.\<lbrakk>x \<in> A; y \<in> B(x); c=<x,y>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P
+ \<And>x y.\<lbrakk>x \<in> A; y \<in> B(x); c=\<langle>x,y\<rangle>\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P
\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P"
by (unfold Sigma_def, blast)
lemma SigmaE2 [elim!]:
- "\<lbrakk><a,b> \<in> Sigma(A,B);
+ "\<lbrakk>\<langle>a,b\<rangle> \<in> Sigma(A,B);
\<lbrakk>a \<in> A; b \<in> B(a)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P
\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P"
by (unfold Sigma_def, blast)
@@ -120,10 +120,10 @@
subsection\<open>Projections \<^term>\<open>fst\<close> and \<^term>\<open>snd\<close>\<close>
-lemma fst_conv [simp]: "fst(<a,b>) = a"
+lemma fst_conv [simp]: "fst(\<langle>a,b\<rangle>) = a"
by (simp add: fst_def)
-lemma snd_conv [simp]: "snd(<a,b>) = b"
+lemma snd_conv [simp]: "snd(\<langle>a,b\<rangle>) = b"
by (simp add: snd_def)
lemma fst_type [TC]: "p \<in> Sigma(A,B) \<Longrightarrow> fst(p) \<in> A"
@@ -139,33 +139,33 @@
subsection\<open>The Eliminator, \<^term>\<open>split\<close>\<close>
(*A META-equality, so that it applies to higher types as well...*)
-lemma split [simp]: "split(%x y. c(x,y), <a,b>) \<equiv> c(a,b)"
+lemma split [simp]: "split(\<lambda>x y. c(x,y), \<langle>a,b\<rangle>) \<equiv> c(a,b)"
by (simp add: split_def)
lemma split_type [TC]:
"\<lbrakk>p \<in> Sigma(A,B);
- \<And>x y.\<lbrakk>x \<in> A; y \<in> B(x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> c(x,y):C(<x,y>)
-\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> split(%x y. c(x,y), p) \<in> C(p)"
+ \<And>x y.\<lbrakk>x \<in> A; y \<in> B(x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> c(x,y):C(\<langle>x,y\<rangle>)
+\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> split(\<lambda>x y. c(x,y), p) \<in> C(p)"
by (erule SigmaE, auto)
lemma expand_split:
"u \<in> A*B \<Longrightarrow>
- R(split(c,u)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>A. \<forall>y\<in>B. u = <x,y> \<longrightarrow> R(c(x,y)))"
+ R(split(c,u)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>A. \<forall>y\<in>B. u = \<langle>x,y\<rangle> \<longrightarrow> R(c(x,y)))"
by (auto simp add: split_def)
subsection\<open>A version of \<^term>\<open>split\<close> for Formulae: Result Type \<^typ>\<open>o\<close>\<close>
-lemma splitI: "R(a,b) \<Longrightarrow> split(R, <a,b>)"
+lemma splitI: "R(a,b) \<Longrightarrow> split(R, \<langle>a,b\<rangle>)"
by (simp add: split_def)
lemma splitE:
"\<lbrakk>split(R,z); z \<in> Sigma(A,B);
- \<And>x y. \<lbrakk>z = <x,y>; R(x,y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P
+ \<And>x y. \<lbrakk>z = \<langle>x,y\<rangle>; R(x,y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P
\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P"
by (auto simp add: split_def)
-lemma splitD: "split(R,<a,b>) \<Longrightarrow> R(a,b)"
+lemma splitD: "split(R,\<langle>a,b\<rangle>) \<Longrightarrow> R(a,b)"
by (simp add: split_def)
text \<open>
@@ -173,11 +173,11 @@
\<close>
lemma split_paired_Bex_Sigma [simp]:
- "(\<exists>z \<in> Sigma(A,B). P(z)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x \<in> A. \<exists>y \<in> B(x). P(<x,y>))"
+ "(\<exists>z \<in> Sigma(A,B). P(z)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x \<in> A. \<exists>y \<in> B(x). P(\<langle>x,y\<rangle>))"
by blast
lemma split_paired_Ball_Sigma [simp]:
- "(\<forall>z \<in> Sigma(A,B). P(z)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x \<in> A. \<forall>y \<in> B(x). P(<x,y>))"
+ "(\<forall>z \<in> Sigma(A,B). P(z)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x \<in> A. \<forall>y \<in> B(x). P(\<langle>x,y\<rangle>))"
by blast
end