--- a/NEWS Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/NEWS Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -196,14 +196,17 @@
* Auxiliary class "itself" has disappeared -- classes without any parameter
are treated as expected by the 'class' command.
-* Theory "Reflection" now resides in HOL/Library. Common reflection examples
-(Cooper, MIR, Ferrack, Approximation) now in distinct session directory
-HOL/Reflection. Here Approximation provides the new proof method
-"approximation". It proves formulas on real values by using interval arithmetic.
+* Leibnitz's Series for Pi and the arcus tangens and logarithm series.
+
+* Common decision procedures (Cooper, MIR, Ferrack, Approximation, Dense_Linear_Order)
+now in directory HOL/Decision_Procs.
+
+* Theory HOL/Decisioin_Procs/Approximation.thy provides the new proof method
+"approximation". It proves formulas on real values by using interval arithmetic.
In the formulas are also the transcendental functions sin, cos, tan, atan, ln,
-exp and the constant pi are allowed. For examples see
-src/HOL/ex/ApproximationEx.thy. To reach this the Leibnitz's Series for Pi and
-the arcus tangens and logarithm series is now proved in Isabelle.
+exp and the constant pi are allowed. For examples see HOL/ex/ApproximationEx.thy.
+
+* Theory "Reflection" now resides in HOL/Library.
* Entry point to Word library now simply named "Word". INCOMPATIBILITY.
@@ -212,7 +215,6 @@
src/HOL/Library/RType.thy ~> src/HOL/Typerep.thy
src/HOL/Library/Code_Message.thy ~> src/HOL/
- src/HOL/Library/Dense_Linear_Order.thy ~> src/HOL/
src/HOL/Library/GCD.thy ~> src/HOL/
src/HOL/Library/Order_Relation.thy ~> src/HOL/
src/HOL/Library/Parity.thy ~> src/HOL/
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Approximation.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2507 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/Approximation.thy
+ * Author: Johannes Hölzl <hoelzl@in.tum.de> 2008 / 2009
+ *)
+header {* Prove unequations about real numbers by computation *}
+theory Approximation
+imports Complex_Main Float Reflection Dense_Linear_Order Efficient_Nat
+begin
+
+section "Horner Scheme"
+
+subsection {* Define auxiliary helper @{text horner} function *}
+
+fun horner :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> nat) \<Rightarrow> (nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat) \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real" where
+"horner F G 0 i k x = 0" |
+"horner F G (Suc n) i k x = 1 / real k - x * horner F G n (F i) (G i k) x"
+
+lemma horner_schema': fixes x :: real and a :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
+ shows "a 0 - x * (\<Sum> i=0..<n. (-1)^i * a (Suc i) * x^i) = (\<Sum> i=0..<Suc n. (-1)^i * a i * x^i)"
+proof -
+ have shift_pow: "\<And>i. - (x * ((-1)^i * a (Suc i) * x ^ i)) = (-1)^(Suc i) * a (Suc i) * x ^ (Suc i)" by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding setsum_right_distrib shift_pow real_diff_def setsum_negf[symmetric] setsum_head_upt_Suc[OF zero_less_Suc]
+ setsum_reindex[OF inj_Suc, unfolded comp_def, symmetric, of "\<lambda> n. (-1)^n *a n * x^n"] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma horner_schema: fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" and G :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat" and F :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
+ assumes f_Suc: "\<And>n. f (Suc n) = G ((F^n) s) (f n)"
+ shows "horner F G n ((F^j') s) (f j') x = (\<Sum> j = 0..< n. -1^j * (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * x^j)"
+proof (induct n arbitrary: i k j')
+ case (Suc n)
+
+ show ?case unfolding horner.simps Suc[where j'="Suc j'", unfolded funpow.simps comp_def f_Suc]
+ using horner_schema'[of "\<lambda> j. 1 / real (f (j' + j))"] by auto
+qed auto
+
+lemma horner_bounds':
+ assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and f_Suc: "\<And>n. f (Suc n) = G ((F^n) s) (f n)"
+ and lb_0: "\<And> i k x. lb 0 i k x = 0"
+ and lb_Suc: "\<And> n i k x. lb (Suc n) i k x = lapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) - x * (ub n (F i) (G i k) x)"
+ and ub_0: "\<And> i k x. ub 0 i k x = 0"
+ and ub_Suc: "\<And> n i k x. ub (Suc n) i k x = rapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) - x * (lb n (F i) (G i k) x)"
+ shows "Ifloat (lb n ((F^j') s) (f j') x) \<le> horner F G n ((F^j') s) (f j') (Ifloat x) \<and>
+ horner F G n ((F^j') s) (f j') (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub n ((F^j') s) (f j') x)"
+ (is "?lb n j' \<le> ?horner n j' \<and> ?horner n j' \<le> ?ub n j'")
+proof (induct n arbitrary: j')
+ case 0 thus ?case unfolding lb_0 ub_0 horner.simps by auto
+next
+ case (Suc n)
+ have "?lb (Suc n) j' \<le> ?horner (Suc n) j'" unfolding lb_Suc ub_Suc horner.simps Ifloat_sub diff_def
+ proof (rule add_mono)
+ show "Ifloat (lapprox_rat prec 1 (int (f j'))) \<le> 1 / real (f j')" using lapprox_rat[of prec 1 "int (f j')"] by auto
+ from Suc[where j'="Suc j'", unfolded funpow.simps comp_def f_Suc, THEN conjunct2] `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ show "- Ifloat (x * ub n (F ((F ^ j') s)) (G ((F ^ j') s) (f j')) x) \<le> - (Ifloat x * horner F G n (F ((F ^ j') s)) (G ((F ^ j') s) (f j')) (Ifloat x))"
+ unfolding Ifloat_mult neg_le_iff_le by (rule mult_left_mono)
+ qed
+ moreover have "?horner (Suc n) j' \<le> ?ub (Suc n) j'" unfolding ub_Suc ub_Suc horner.simps Ifloat_sub diff_def
+ proof (rule add_mono)
+ show "1 / real (f j') \<le> Ifloat (rapprox_rat prec 1 (int (f j')))" using rapprox_rat[of 1 "int (f j')" prec] by auto
+ from Suc[where j'="Suc j'", unfolded funpow.simps comp_def f_Suc, THEN conjunct1] `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ show "- (Ifloat x * horner F G n (F ((F ^ j') s)) (G ((F ^ j') s) (f j')) (Ifloat x)) \<le>
+ - Ifloat (x * lb n (F ((F ^ j') s)) (G ((F ^ j') s) (f j')) x)"
+ unfolding Ifloat_mult neg_le_iff_le by (rule mult_left_mono)
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed
+
+subsection "Theorems for floating point functions implementing the horner scheme"
+
+text {*
+
+Here @{term_type "f :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat"} is the sequence defining the Taylor series, the coefficients are
+all alternating and reciprocs. We use @{term G} and @{term F} to describe the computation of @{term f}.
+
+*}
+
+lemma horner_bounds: fixes F :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" and G :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
+ assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and f_Suc: "\<And>n. f (Suc n) = G ((F^n) s) (f n)"
+ and lb_0: "\<And> i k x. lb 0 i k x = 0"
+ and lb_Suc: "\<And> n i k x. lb (Suc n) i k x = lapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) - x * (ub n (F i) (G i k) x)"
+ and ub_0: "\<And> i k x. ub 0 i k x = 0"
+ and ub_Suc: "\<And> n i k x. ub (Suc n) i k x = rapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) - x * (lb n (F i) (G i k) x)"
+ shows "Ifloat (lb n ((F^j') s) (f j') x) \<le> (\<Sum>j=0..<n. -1^j * (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * (Ifloat x)^j)" (is "?lb") and
+ "(\<Sum>j=0..<n. -1^j * (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * (Ifloat x)^j) \<le> Ifloat (ub n ((F^j') s) (f j') x)" (is "?ub")
+proof -
+ have "?lb \<and> ?ub"
+ using horner_bounds'[where lb=lb, OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` f_Suc lb_0 lb_Suc ub_0 ub_Suc]
+ unfolding horner_schema[where f=f, OF f_Suc] .
+ thus "?lb" and "?ub" by auto
+qed
+
+lemma horner_bounds_nonpos: fixes F :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" and G :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
+ assumes "Ifloat x \<le> 0" and f_Suc: "\<And>n. f (Suc n) = G ((F^n) s) (f n)"
+ and lb_0: "\<And> i k x. lb 0 i k x = 0"
+ and lb_Suc: "\<And> n i k x. lb (Suc n) i k x = lapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) + x * (ub n (F i) (G i k) x)"
+ and ub_0: "\<And> i k x. ub 0 i k x = 0"
+ and ub_Suc: "\<And> n i k x. ub (Suc n) i k x = rapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) + x * (lb n (F i) (G i k) x)"
+ shows "Ifloat (lb n ((F^j') s) (f j') x) \<le> (\<Sum>j=0..<n. (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * (Ifloat x)^j)" (is "?lb") and
+ "(\<Sum>j=0..<n. (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * (Ifloat x)^j) \<le> Ifloat (ub n ((F^j') s) (f j') x)" (is "?ub")
+proof -
+ { fix x y z :: float have "x - y * z = x + - y * z"
+ by (cases x, cases y, cases z, simp add: plus_float.simps minus_float.simps uminus_float.simps times_float.simps algebra_simps)
+ } note diff_mult_minus = this
+
+ { fix x :: float have "- (- x) = x" by (cases x, auto simp add: uminus_float.simps) } note minus_minus = this
+
+ have move_minus: "Ifloat (-x) = -1 * Ifloat x" by auto
+
+ have sum_eq: "(\<Sum>j=0..<n. (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * (Ifloat x)^j) =
+ (\<Sum>j = 0..<n. -1 ^ j * (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * Ifloat (- x) ^ j)"
+ proof (rule setsum_cong, simp)
+ fix j assume "j \<in> {0 ..< n}"
+ show "1 / real (f (j' + j)) * Ifloat x ^ j = -1 ^ j * (1 / real (f (j' + j))) * Ifloat (- x) ^ j"
+ unfolding move_minus power_mult_distrib real_mult_assoc[symmetric]
+ unfolding real_mult_commute unfolding real_mult_assoc[of "-1^j", symmetric] power_mult_distrib[symmetric]
+ by auto
+ qed
+
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (-x)" using assms by auto
+ from horner_bounds[where G=G and F=F and f=f and s=s and prec=prec
+ and lb="\<lambda> n i k x. lb n i k (-x)" and ub="\<lambda> n i k x. ub n i k (-x)", unfolded lb_Suc ub_Suc diff_mult_minus,
+ OF this f_Suc lb_0 refl ub_0 refl]
+ show "?lb" and "?ub" unfolding minus_minus sum_eq
+ by auto
+qed
+
+subsection {* Selectors for next even or odd number *}
+
+text {*
+
+The horner scheme computes alternating series. To get the upper and lower bounds we need to
+guarantee to access a even or odd member. To do this we use @{term get_odd} and @{term get_even}.
+
+*}
+
+definition get_odd :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where
+ "get_odd n = (if odd n then n else (Suc n))"
+
+definition get_even :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where
+ "get_even n = (if even n then n else (Suc n))"
+
+lemma get_odd[simp]: "odd (get_odd n)" unfolding get_odd_def by (cases "odd n", auto)
+lemma get_even[simp]: "even (get_even n)" unfolding get_even_def by (cases "even n", auto)
+lemma get_odd_ex: "\<exists> k. Suc k = get_odd n \<and> odd (Suc k)"
+proof (cases "odd n")
+ case True hence "0 < n" by (rule odd_pos)
+ from gr0_implies_Suc[OF this] obtain k where "Suc k = n" by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding get_odd_def if_P[OF True] using True[unfolded `Suc k = n`[symmetric]] by blast
+next
+ case False hence "odd (Suc n)" by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding get_odd_def if_not_P[OF False] by blast
+qed
+
+lemma get_even_double: "\<exists>i. get_even n = 2 * i" using get_even[unfolded even_mult_two_ex] .
+lemma get_odd_double: "\<exists>i. get_odd n = 2 * i + 1" using get_odd[unfolded odd_Suc_mult_two_ex] by auto
+
+section "Power function"
+
+definition float_power_bnds :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float * float" where
+"float_power_bnds n l u = (if odd n \<or> 0 < l then (l ^ n, u ^ n)
+ else if u < 0 then (u ^ n, l ^ n)
+ else (0, (max (-l) u) ^ n))"
+
+lemma float_power_bnds: assumes "(l1, u1) = float_power_bnds n l u" and "x \<in> {Ifloat l .. Ifloat u}"
+ shows "x^n \<in> {Ifloat l1..Ifloat u1}"
+proof (cases "even n")
+ case True
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "0 < l")
+ case True hence "odd n \<or> 0 < l" and "0 \<le> Ifloat l" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have u1: "u1 = u ^ n" and l1: "l1 = l ^ n" using assms unfolding float_power_bnds_def if_P[OF `odd n \<or> 0 < l`] by auto
+ have "Ifloat l^n \<le> x^n" and "x^n \<le> Ifloat u^n " using `0 \<le> Ifloat l` and assms unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff using power_mono[of "Ifloat l" x] power_mono[of x "Ifloat u"] by auto
+ thus ?thesis using assms `0 < l` unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff l1 u1 float_power less_float_def by auto
+ next
+ case False hence P: "\<not> (odd n \<or> 0 < l)" using `even n` by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "u < 0")
+ case True hence "0 \<le> - Ifloat u" and "- Ifloat u \<le> - x" and "0 \<le> - x" and "-x \<le> - Ifloat l" using assms unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ hence "Ifloat u^n \<le> x^n" and "x^n \<le> Ifloat l^n" using power_mono[of "-x" "-Ifloat l" n] power_mono[of "-Ifloat u" "-x" n]
+ unfolding power_minus_even[OF `even n`] by auto
+ moreover have u1: "u1 = l ^ n" and l1: "l1 = u ^ n" using assms unfolding float_power_bnds_def if_not_P[OF P] if_P[OF True] by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis using float_power by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ have "\<bar>x\<bar> \<le> Ifloat (max (-l) u)"
+ proof (cases "-l \<le> u")
+ case True thus ?thesis unfolding max_def if_P[OF True] using assms unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ next
+ case False thus ?thesis unfolding max_def if_not_P[OF False] using assms unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ qed
+ hence x_abs: "\<bar>x\<bar> \<le> \<bar>Ifloat (max (-l) u)\<bar>" by auto
+ have u1: "u1 = (max (-l) u) ^ n" and l1: "l1 = 0" using assms unfolding float_power_bnds_def if_not_P[OF P] if_not_P[OF False] by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff l1 u1 float_power using zero_le_even_power[OF `even n`] power_mono_even[OF `even n` x_abs] by auto
+ qed
+ qed
+next
+ case False hence "odd n \<or> 0 < l" by auto
+ have u1: "u1 = u ^ n" and l1: "l1 = l ^ n" using assms unfolding float_power_bnds_def if_P[OF `odd n \<or> 0 < l`] by auto
+ have "Ifloat l^n \<le> x^n" and "x^n \<le> Ifloat u^n " using assms unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff using power_mono_odd[OF False] by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff l1 u1 float_power less_float_def by auto
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_power: "\<forall> x l u. (l1, u1) = float_power_bnds n l u \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat l .. Ifloat u} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l1 \<le> x^n \<and> x^n \<le> Ifloat u1"
+ using float_power_bnds by auto
+
+section "Square root"
+
+text {*
+
+The square root computation is implemented as newton iteration. As first first step we use the
+nearest power of two greater than the square root.
+
+*}
+
+fun sqrt_iteration :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"sqrt_iteration prec 0 (Float m e) = Float 1 ((e + bitlen m) div 2 + 1)" |
+"sqrt_iteration prec (Suc m) x = (let y = sqrt_iteration prec m x
+ in Float 1 -1 * (y + float_divr prec x y))"
+
+definition ub_sqrt :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float option" where
+"ub_sqrt prec x = (if 0 < x then Some (sqrt_iteration prec prec x) else if x < 0 then None else Some 0)"
+
+definition lb_sqrt :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float option" where
+"lb_sqrt prec x = (if 0 < x then Some (float_divl prec x (sqrt_iteration prec prec x)) else if x < 0 then None else Some 0)"
+
+lemma sqrt_ub_pos_pos_1:
+ assumes "sqrt x < b" and "0 < b" and "0 < x"
+ shows "sqrt x < (b + x / b)/2"
+proof -
+ from assms have "0 < (b - sqrt x) ^ 2 " by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = b ^ 2 - 2 * b * sqrt x + (sqrt x) ^ 2" by algebra
+ also have "\<dots> = b ^ 2 - 2 * b * sqrt x + x" using assms by (simp add: real_sqrt_pow2)
+ finally have "0 < b ^ 2 - 2 * b * sqrt x + x" by assumption
+ hence "0 < b / 2 - sqrt x + x / (2 * b)" using assms
+ by (simp add: field_simps power2_eq_square)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp add: field_simps)
+qed
+
+lemma sqrt_iteration_bound: assumes "0 < Ifloat x"
+ shows "sqrt (Ifloat x) < Ifloat (sqrt_iteration prec n x)"
+proof (induct n)
+ case 0
+ show ?case
+ proof (cases x)
+ case (Float m e)
+ hence "0 < m" using float_pos_m_pos[unfolded less_float_def] assms by auto
+ hence "0 < sqrt (real m)" by auto
+
+ have int_nat_bl: "int (nat (bitlen m)) = bitlen m" using bitlen_ge0 by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat x = (real m / 2^nat (bitlen m)) * pow2 (e + int (nat (bitlen m)))"
+ unfolding pow2_add pow2_int Float Ifloat.simps by auto
+ also have "\<dots> < 1 * pow2 (e + int (nat (bitlen m)))"
+ proof (rule mult_strict_right_mono, auto)
+ show "real m < 2^nat (bitlen m)" using bitlen_bounds[OF `0 < m`, THEN conjunct2]
+ unfolding real_of_int_less_iff[of m, symmetric] by auto
+ qed
+ finally have "sqrt (Ifloat x) < sqrt (pow2 (e + bitlen m))" unfolding int_nat_bl by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> pow2 ((e + bitlen m) div 2 + 1)"
+ proof -
+ let ?E = "e + bitlen m"
+ have E_mod_pow: "pow2 (?E mod 2) < 4"
+ proof (cases "?E mod 2 = 1")
+ case True thus ?thesis by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ have "0 \<le> ?E mod 2" by auto
+ have "?E mod 2 < 2" by auto
+ from this[THEN zless_imp_add1_zle]
+ have "?E mod 2 \<le> 0" using False by auto
+ from xt1(5)[OF `0 \<le> ?E mod 2` this]
+ show ?thesis by auto
+ qed
+ hence "sqrt (pow2 (?E mod 2)) < sqrt (2 * 2)" by auto
+ hence E_mod_pow: "sqrt (pow2 (?E mod 2)) < 2" unfolding real_sqrt_abs2 by auto
+
+ have E_eq: "pow2 ?E = pow2 (?E div 2 + ?E div 2 + ?E mod 2)" by auto
+ have "sqrt (pow2 ?E) = sqrt (pow2 (?E div 2) * pow2 (?E div 2) * pow2 (?E mod 2))"
+ unfolding E_eq unfolding pow2_add ..
+ also have "\<dots> = pow2 (?E div 2) * sqrt (pow2 (?E mod 2))"
+ unfolding real_sqrt_mult[of _ "pow2 (?E mod 2)"] real_sqrt_abs2 by auto
+ also have "\<dots> < pow2 (?E div 2) * 2"
+ by (rule mult_strict_left_mono, auto intro: E_mod_pow)
+ also have "\<dots> = pow2 (?E div 2 + 1)" unfolding zadd_commute[of _ 1] pow2_add1 by auto
+ finally show ?thesis by auto
+ qed
+ finally show ?thesis
+ unfolding Float sqrt_iteration.simps Ifloat.simps by auto
+ qed
+next
+ case (Suc n)
+ let ?b = "sqrt_iteration prec n x"
+ have "0 < sqrt (Ifloat x)" using `0 < Ifloat x` by auto
+ also have "\<dots> < Ifloat ?b" using Suc .
+ finally have "sqrt (Ifloat x) < (Ifloat ?b + Ifloat x / Ifloat ?b)/2" using sqrt_ub_pos_pos_1[OF Suc _ `0 < Ifloat x`] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> (Ifloat ?b + Ifloat (float_divr prec x ?b))/2" by (rule divide_right_mono, auto simp add: float_divr)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifloat (Float 1 -1) * (Ifloat ?b + Ifloat (float_divr prec x ?b))" by auto
+ finally show ?case unfolding sqrt_iteration.simps Let_def Ifloat_mult Ifloat_add right_distrib .
+qed
+
+lemma sqrt_iteration_lower_bound: assumes "0 < Ifloat x"
+ shows "0 < Ifloat (sqrt_iteration prec n x)" (is "0 < ?sqrt")
+proof -
+ have "0 < sqrt (Ifloat x)" using assms by auto
+ also have "\<dots> < ?sqrt" using sqrt_iteration_bound[OF assms] .
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma lb_sqrt_lower_bound: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ shows "0 \<le> Ifloat (the (lb_sqrt prec x))"
+proof (cases "0 < x")
+ case True hence "0 < Ifloat x" and "0 \<le> x" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ hence "0 < sqrt_iteration prec prec x" unfolding less_float_def using sqrt_iteration_lower_bound by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> Ifloat (float_divl prec x (sqrt_iteration prec prec x))" using float_divl_lower_bound[OF `0 \<le> x`] unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding lb_sqrt_def using True by auto
+next
+ case False with `0 \<le> Ifloat x` have "Ifloat x = 0" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding lb_sqrt_def less_float_def by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lb_sqrt_upper_bound: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ shows "Ifloat (the (lb_sqrt prec x)) \<le> sqrt (Ifloat x)"
+proof (cases "0 < x")
+ case True hence "0 < Ifloat x" and "0 \<le> Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ hence sqrt_gt0: "0 < sqrt (Ifloat x)" by auto
+ hence sqrt_ub: "sqrt (Ifloat x) < Ifloat (sqrt_iteration prec prec x)" using sqrt_iteration_bound by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (float_divl prec x (sqrt_iteration prec prec x)) \<le> Ifloat x / Ifloat (sqrt_iteration prec prec x)" by (rule float_divl)
+ also have "\<dots> < Ifloat x / sqrt (Ifloat x)"
+ by (rule divide_strict_left_mono[OF sqrt_ub `0 < Ifloat x` mult_pos_pos[OF order_less_trans[OF sqrt_gt0 sqrt_ub] sqrt_gt0]])
+ also have "\<dots> = sqrt (Ifloat x)" unfolding inverse_eq_iff_eq[of _ "sqrt (Ifloat x)", symmetric] sqrt_divide_self_eq[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`, symmetric] by auto
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding lb_sqrt_def if_P[OF `0 < x`] by auto
+next
+ case False with `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ have "\<not> x < 0" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_sqrt_def if_not_P[OF False] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] using assms by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lb_sqrt: assumes "Some y = lb_sqrt prec x"
+ shows "Ifloat y \<le> sqrt (Ifloat x)" and "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+proof -
+ show "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ proof (rule ccontr)
+ assume "\<not> 0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ hence "lb_sqrt prec x = None" unfolding lb_sqrt_def less_float_def by auto
+ thus False using assms by auto
+ qed
+ from lb_sqrt_upper_bound[OF this, of prec]
+ show "Ifloat y \<le> sqrt (Ifloat x)" unfolding assms[symmetric] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma ub_sqrt_lower_bound: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ shows "sqrt (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_sqrt prec x))"
+proof (cases "0 < x")
+ case True hence "0 < Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ hence "0 < sqrt (Ifloat x)" by auto
+ hence "sqrt (Ifloat x) < Ifloat (sqrt_iteration prec prec x)" using sqrt_iteration_bound by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding ub_sqrt_def if_P[OF `0 < x`] by auto
+next
+ case False with `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ have "Ifloat x = 0" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding ub_sqrt_def less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+qed
+
+lemma ub_sqrt: assumes "Some y = ub_sqrt prec x"
+ shows "sqrt (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat y" and "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+proof -
+ show "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ proof (rule ccontr)
+ assume "\<not> 0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ hence "ub_sqrt prec x = None" unfolding ub_sqrt_def less_float_def by auto
+ thus False using assms by auto
+ qed
+ from ub_sqrt_lower_bound[OF this, of prec]
+ show "sqrt (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat y" unfolding assms[symmetric] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_sqrt: "\<forall> x lx ux. (Some l, Some u) = (lb_sqrt prec lx, ub_sqrt prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> sqrt x \<and> sqrt x \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof (rule allI, rule allI, rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x lx ux
+ assume "(Some l, Some u) = (lb_sqrt prec lx, ub_sqrt prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}"
+ hence l: "Some l = lb_sqrt prec lx " and u: "Some u = ub_sqrt prec ux" and x: "x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}" by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat lx \<le> x" and "x \<le> Ifloat ux" using x by auto
+
+ from lb_sqrt(1)[OF l] real_sqrt_le_mono[OF `Ifloat lx \<le> x`]
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> sqrt x" by (rule order_trans)
+ moreover
+ from real_sqrt_le_mono[OF `x \<le> Ifloat ux`] ub_sqrt(1)[OF u]
+ have "sqrt x \<le> Ifloat u" by (rule order_trans)
+ ultimately show "Ifloat l \<le> sqrt x \<and> sqrt x \<le> Ifloat u" ..
+qed
+
+section "Arcus tangens and \<pi>"
+
+subsection "Compute arcus tangens series"
+
+text {*
+
+As first step we implement the computation of the arcus tangens series. This is only valid in the range
+@{term "{-1 :: real .. 1}"}. This is used to compute \<pi> and then the entire arcus tangens.
+
+*}
+
+fun ub_arctan_horner :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float"
+and lb_arctan_horner :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+ "ub_arctan_horner prec 0 k x = 0"
+| "ub_arctan_horner prec (Suc n) k x =
+ (rapprox_rat prec 1 (int k)) - x * (lb_arctan_horner prec n (k + 2) x)"
+| "lb_arctan_horner prec 0 k x = 0"
+| "lb_arctan_horner prec (Suc n) k x =
+ (lapprox_rat prec 1 (int k)) - x * (ub_arctan_horner prec n (k + 2) x)"
+
+lemma arctan_0_1_bounds': assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" "Ifloat x \<le> 1" and "even n"
+ shows "arctan (Ifloat x) \<in> {Ifloat (x * lb_arctan_horner prec n 1 (x * x)) .. Ifloat (x * ub_arctan_horner prec (Suc n) 1 (x * x))}"
+proof -
+ let "?c i" = "-1^i * (1 / real (i * 2 + 1) * Ifloat x ^ (i * 2 + 1))"
+ let "?S n" = "\<Sum> i=0..<n. ?c i"
+
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (x * x)" by auto
+ from `even n` obtain m where "2 * m = n" unfolding even_mult_two_ex by auto
+
+ have "arctan (Ifloat x) \<in> { ?S n .. ?S (Suc n) }"
+ proof (cases "Ifloat x = 0")
+ case False
+ hence "0 < Ifloat x" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` by auto
+ hence prem: "0 < 1 / real (0 * 2 + (1::nat)) * Ifloat x ^ (0 * 2 + 1)" by auto
+
+ have "\<bar> Ifloat x \<bar> \<le> 1" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1` by auto
+ from mp[OF summable_Leibniz(2)[OF zeroseq_arctan_series[OF this] monoseq_arctan_series[OF this]] prem, THEN spec, of m, unfolded `2 * m = n`]
+ show ?thesis unfolding arctan_series[OF `\<bar> Ifloat x \<bar> \<le> 1`] Suc_plus1 .
+ qed auto
+ note arctan_bounds = this[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff]
+
+ have F: "\<And>n. 2 * Suc n + 1 = 2 * n + 1 + 2" by auto
+
+ note bounds = horner_bounds[where s=1 and f="\<lambda>i. 2 * i + 1" and j'=0
+ and lb="\<lambda>n i k x. lb_arctan_horner prec n k x"
+ and ub="\<lambda>n i k x. ub_arctan_horner prec n k x",
+ OF `0 \<le> Ifloat (x*x)` F lb_arctan_horner.simps ub_arctan_horner.simps]
+
+ { have "Ifloat (x * lb_arctan_horner prec n 1 (x*x)) \<le> ?S n"
+ using bounds(1) `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ unfolding Ifloat_mult power_add power_one_right real_mult_assoc[symmetric] setsum_left_distrib[symmetric]
+ unfolding real_mult_commute mult_commute[of _ "2::nat"] power_mult power2_eq_square[of "Ifloat x"]
+ by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)" using arctan_bounds ..
+ finally have "Ifloat (x * lb_arctan_horner prec n 1 (x*x)) \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)" . }
+ moreover
+ { have "arctan (Ifloat x) \<le> ?S (Suc n)" using arctan_bounds ..
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_arctan_horner prec (Suc n) 1 (x*x))"
+ using bounds(2)[of "Suc n"] `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ unfolding Ifloat_mult power_add power_one_right real_mult_assoc[symmetric] setsum_left_distrib[symmetric]
+ unfolding real_mult_commute mult_commute[of _ "2::nat"] power_mult power2_eq_square[of "Ifloat x"]
+ by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono)
+ finally have "arctan (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_arctan_horner prec (Suc n) 1 (x*x))" . }
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+lemma arctan_0_1_bounds: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" "Ifloat x \<le> 1"
+ shows "arctan (Ifloat x) \<in> {Ifloat (x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even n) 1 (x * x)) .. Ifloat (x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 (x * x))}"
+proof (cases "even n")
+ case True
+ obtain n' where "Suc n' = get_odd n" and "odd (Suc n')" using get_odd_ex by auto
+ hence "even n'" unfolding even_nat_Suc by auto
+ have "arctan (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 (x * x))"
+ unfolding `Suc n' = get_odd n`[symmetric] using arctan_0_1_bounds'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1` `even n'`] by auto
+ moreover
+ have "Ifloat (x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even n) 1 (x * x)) \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)"
+ unfolding get_even_def if_P[OF True] using arctan_0_1_bounds'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1` `even n`] by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+next
+ case False hence "0 < n" by (rule odd_pos)
+ from gr0_implies_Suc[OF this] obtain n' where "n = Suc n'" ..
+ from False[unfolded this even_nat_Suc]
+ have "even n'" and "even (Suc (Suc n'))" by auto
+ have "get_odd n = Suc n'" unfolding get_odd_def if_P[OF False] using `n = Suc n'` .
+
+ have "arctan (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 (x * x))"
+ unfolding `get_odd n = Suc n'` using arctan_0_1_bounds'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1` `even n'`] by auto
+ moreover
+ have "Ifloat (x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even n) 1 (x * x)) \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)"
+ unfolding get_even_def if_not_P[OF False] unfolding `n = Suc n'` using arctan_0_1_bounds'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1` `even (Suc (Suc n'))`] by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute \<pi>"
+
+definition ub_pi :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float" where
+ "ub_pi prec = (let A = rapprox_rat prec 1 5 ;
+ B = lapprox_rat prec 1 239
+ in ((Float 1 2) * ((Float 1 2) * A * (ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (A * A)) -
+ B * (lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even (prec div 14 + 1)) 1 (B * B)))))"
+
+definition lb_pi :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float" where
+ "lb_pi prec = (let A = lapprox_rat prec 1 5 ;
+ B = rapprox_rat prec 1 239
+ in ((Float 1 2) * ((Float 1 2) * A * (lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (A * A)) -
+ B * (ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd (prec div 14 + 1)) 1 (B * B)))))"
+
+lemma pi_boundaries: "pi \<in> {Ifloat (lb_pi n) .. Ifloat (ub_pi n)}"
+proof -
+ have machin_pi: "pi = 4 * (4 * arctan (1 / 5) - arctan (1 / 239))" unfolding machin[symmetric] by auto
+
+ { fix prec n :: nat fix k :: int assume "1 < k" hence "0 \<le> k" and "0 < k" and "1 \<le> k" by auto
+ let ?k = "rapprox_rat prec 1 k"
+ have "1 div k = 0" using div_pos_pos_trivial[OF _ `1 < k`] by auto
+
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat ?k" by (rule order_trans[OF _ rapprox_rat], auto simp add: `0 \<le> k`)
+ have "Ifloat ?k \<le> 1" unfolding rapprox_rat.simps(2)[OF zero_le_one `0 < k`]
+ by (rule rapprox_posrat_le1, auto simp add: `0 < k` `1 \<le> k`)
+
+ have "1 / real k \<le> Ifloat ?k" using rapprox_rat[where x=1 and y=k] by auto
+ hence "arctan (1 / real k) \<le> arctan (Ifloat ?k)" by (rule arctan_monotone')
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (?k * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 (?k * ?k))"
+ using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?k` `Ifloat ?k \<le> 1`] by auto
+ finally have "arctan (1 / (real k)) \<le> Ifloat (?k * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 (?k * ?k))" .
+ } note ub_arctan = this
+
+ { fix prec n :: nat fix k :: int assume "1 < k" hence "0 \<le> k" and "0 < k" by auto
+ let ?k = "lapprox_rat prec 1 k"
+ have "1 div k = 0" using div_pos_pos_trivial[OF _ `1 < k`] by auto
+ have "1 / real k \<le> 1" using `1 < k` by auto
+
+ have "\<And>n. 0 \<le> Ifloat ?k" using lapprox_rat_bottom[where x=1 and y=k, OF zero_le_one `0 < k`] by (auto simp add: `1 div k = 0`)
+ have "\<And>n. Ifloat ?k \<le> 1" using lapprox_rat by (rule order_trans, auto simp add: `1 / real k \<le> 1`)
+
+ have "Ifloat ?k \<le> 1 / real k" using lapprox_rat[where x=1 and y=k] by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (?k * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even n) 1 (?k * ?k)) \<le> arctan (Ifloat ?k)"
+ using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?k` `Ifloat ?k \<le> 1`] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> arctan (1 / real k)" using `Ifloat ?k \<le> 1 / real k` by (rule arctan_monotone')
+ finally have "Ifloat (?k * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even n) 1 (?k * ?k)) \<le> arctan (1 / (real k))" .
+ } note lb_arctan = this
+
+ have "pi \<le> Ifloat (ub_pi n)"
+ unfolding ub_pi_def machin_pi Let_def Ifloat_mult Ifloat_sub unfolding Float_num
+ using lb_arctan[of 239] ub_arctan[of 5]
+ by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono add_mono simp add: diff_minus simp del: lapprox_rat.simps rapprox_rat.simps)
+ moreover
+ have "Ifloat (lb_pi n) \<le> pi"
+ unfolding lb_pi_def machin_pi Let_def Ifloat_mult Ifloat_sub Float_num
+ using lb_arctan[of 5] ub_arctan[of 239]
+ by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono add_mono simp add: diff_minus simp del: lapprox_rat.simps rapprox_rat.simps)
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute arcus tangens in the entire domain"
+
+function lb_arctan :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" and ub_arctan :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+ "lb_arctan prec x = (let ub_horner = \<lambda> x. x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x) ;
+ lb_horner = \<lambda> x. x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x)
+ in (if x < 0 then - ub_arctan prec (-x) else
+ if x \<le> Float 1 -1 then lb_horner x else
+ if x \<le> Float 1 1 then Float 1 1 * lb_horner (float_divl prec x (1 + the (ub_sqrt prec (1 + x * x))))
+ else (let inv = float_divr prec 1 x
+ in if inv > 1 then 0
+ else lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1 - ub_horner inv)))"
+
+| "ub_arctan prec x = (let lb_horner = \<lambda> x. x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x) ;
+ ub_horner = \<lambda> x. x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x)
+ in (if x < 0 then - lb_arctan prec (-x) else
+ if x \<le> Float 1 -1 then ub_horner x else
+ if x \<le> Float 1 1 then let y = float_divr prec x (1 + the (lb_sqrt prec (1 + x * x)))
+ in if y > 1 then ub_pi prec * Float 1 -1
+ else Float 1 1 * ub_horner y
+ else ub_pi prec * Float 1 -1 - lb_horner (float_divl prec 1 x)))"
+by pat_completeness auto
+termination by (relation "measure (\<lambda> v. let (prec, x) = sum_case id id v in (if x < 0 then 1 else 0))", auto simp add: less_float_def)
+
+declare ub_arctan_horner.simps[simp del]
+declare lb_arctan_horner.simps[simp del]
+
+lemma lb_arctan_bound': assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ shows "Ifloat (lb_arctan prec x) \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)"
+proof -
+ have "\<not> x < 0" and "0 \<le> x" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` by auto
+ let "?ub_horner x" = "x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x)"
+ and "?lb_horner x" = "x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x)"
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x \<le> Float 1 -1")
+ case True hence "Ifloat x \<le> 1" unfolding le_float_def Float_num by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_P[OF True]
+ using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1`] by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "0 < Ifloat x" unfolding le_float_def Float_num by auto
+ let ?R = "1 + sqrt (1 + Ifloat x * Ifloat x)"
+ let ?fR = "1 + the (ub_sqrt prec (1 + x * x))"
+ let ?DIV = "float_divl prec x ?fR"
+
+ have sqr_ge0: "0 \<le> 1 + Ifloat x * Ifloat x" using sum_power2_ge_zero[of 1 "Ifloat x", unfolded numeral_2_eq_2] by auto
+ hence divisor_gt0: "0 < ?R" by (auto intro: add_pos_nonneg)
+
+ have "sqrt (Ifloat (1 + x * x)) \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_sqrt prec (1 + x * x)))" by (rule ub_sqrt_lower_bound, auto simp add: sqr_ge0)
+ hence "?R \<le> Ifloat ?fR" by auto
+ hence "0 < ?fR" and "0 < Ifloat ?fR" unfolding less_float_def using `0 < ?R` by auto
+
+ have monotone: "Ifloat (float_divl prec x ?fR) \<le> Ifloat x / ?R"
+ proof -
+ have "Ifloat ?DIV \<le> Ifloat x / Ifloat ?fR" by (rule float_divl)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat x / ?R" by (rule divide_left_mono[OF `?R \<le> Ifloat ?fR` `0 \<le> Ifloat x` mult_pos_pos[OF order_less_le_trans[OF divisor_gt0 `?R \<le> Ifloat ?fR`] divisor_gt0]])
+ finally show ?thesis .
+ qed
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x \<le> Float 1 1")
+ case True
+
+ have "Ifloat x \<le> sqrt (Ifloat (1 + x * x))" using real_sqrt_sum_squares_ge2[where x=1, unfolded numeral_2_eq_2] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_sqrt prec (1 + x * x)))" by (rule ub_sqrt_lower_bound, auto simp add: sqr_ge0)
+ finally have "Ifloat x \<le> Ifloat ?fR" by auto
+ moreover have "Ifloat ?DIV \<le> Ifloat x / Ifloat ?fR" by (rule float_divl)
+ ultimately have "Ifloat ?DIV \<le> 1" unfolding divide_le_eq_1_pos[OF `0 < Ifloat ?fR`, symmetric] by auto
+
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat ?DIV" using float_divl_lower_bound[OF `0 \<le> x` `0 < ?fR`] unfolding le_float_def by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (Float 1 1 * ?lb_horner ?DIV) \<le> 2 * arctan (Ifloat (float_divl prec x ?fR))" unfolding Ifloat_mult[of "Float 1 1"] Float_num
+ using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?DIV` `Ifloat ?DIV \<le> 1`] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> 2 * arctan (Ifloat x / ?R)"
+ using arctan_monotone'[OF monotone] by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono)
+ also have "2 * arctan (Ifloat x / ?R) = arctan (Ifloat x)" using arctan_half[symmetric] unfolding numeral_2_eq_2 power_Suc2 realpow_0 real_mult_1 .
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding lb_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_P[OF True] .
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "2 < Ifloat x" unfolding le_float_def Float_num by auto
+ hence "1 \<le> Ifloat x" by auto
+
+ let "?invx" = "float_divr prec 1 x"
+ have "0 \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)" using arctan_monotone'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`] using arctan_tan[of 0, unfolded tan_zero] by auto
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "1 < ?invx")
+ case True
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF False] if_P[OF True]
+ using `0 \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)` by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "Ifloat ?invx \<le> 1" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat ?invx" by (rule order_trans[OF _ float_divr], auto simp add: `0 \<le> Ifloat x`)
+
+ have "1 / Ifloat x \<noteq> 0" and "0 < 1 / Ifloat x" using `0 < Ifloat x` by auto
+
+ have "arctan (1 / Ifloat x) \<le> arctan (Ifloat ?invx)" unfolding Ifloat_1[symmetric] by (rule arctan_monotone', rule float_divr)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (?ub_horner ?invx)" using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?invx` `Ifloat ?invx \<le> 1`] by auto
+ finally have "pi / 2 - Ifloat (?ub_horner ?invx) \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)"
+ using `0 \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)` arctan_inverse[OF `1 / Ifloat x \<noteq> 0`]
+ unfolding real_sgn_pos[OF `0 < 1 / Ifloat x`] le_diff_eq by auto
+ moreover
+ have "Ifloat (lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1) \<le> pi / 2" unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num times_divide_eq_right real_mult_1 using pi_boundaries by auto
+ ultimately
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 1`] if_not_P[OF False]
+ by auto
+ qed
+ qed
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma ub_arctan_bound': assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ shows "arctan (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_arctan prec x)"
+proof -
+ have "\<not> x < 0" and "0 \<le> x" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` by auto
+
+ let "?ub_horner x" = "x * ub_arctan_horner prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x)"
+ and "?lb_horner x" = "x * lb_arctan_horner prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 (x * x)"
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x \<le> Float 1 -1")
+ case True hence "Ifloat x \<le> 1" unfolding le_float_def Float_num by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding ub_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_P[OF True]
+ using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 1`] by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "0 < Ifloat x" unfolding le_float_def Float_num by auto
+ let ?R = "1 + sqrt (1 + Ifloat x * Ifloat x)"
+ let ?fR = "1 + the (lb_sqrt prec (1 + x * x))"
+ let ?DIV = "float_divr prec x ?fR"
+
+ have sqr_ge0: "0 \<le> 1 + Ifloat x * Ifloat x" using sum_power2_ge_zero[of 1 "Ifloat x", unfolded numeral_2_eq_2] by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> Ifloat (1 + x*x)" by auto
+
+ hence divisor_gt0: "0 < ?R" by (auto intro: add_pos_nonneg)
+
+ have "Ifloat (the (lb_sqrt prec (1 + x * x))) \<le> sqrt (Ifloat (1 + x * x))" by (rule lb_sqrt_upper_bound, auto simp add: sqr_ge0)
+ hence "Ifloat ?fR \<le> ?R" by auto
+ have "0 < Ifloat ?fR" unfolding Ifloat_add Ifloat_1 by (rule order_less_le_trans[OF zero_less_one], auto simp add: lb_sqrt_lower_bound[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat (1 + x*x)`])
+
+ have monotone: "Ifloat x / ?R \<le> Ifloat (float_divr prec x ?fR)"
+ proof -
+ from divide_left_mono[OF `Ifloat ?fR \<le> ?R` `0 \<le> Ifloat x` mult_pos_pos[OF divisor_gt0 `0 < Ifloat ?fR`]]
+ have "Ifloat x / ?R \<le> Ifloat x / Ifloat ?fR" .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat ?DIV" by (rule float_divr)
+ finally show ?thesis .
+ qed
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x \<le> Float 1 1")
+ case True
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "?DIV > 1")
+ case True
+ have "pi / 2 \<le> Ifloat (ub_pi prec * Float 1 -1)" unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num times_divide_eq_right real_mult_1 using pi_boundaries by auto
+ from order_less_le_trans[OF arctan_ubound this, THEN less_imp_le]
+ show ?thesis unfolding ub_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_P[OF `x \<le> Float 1 1`] if_P[OF True] .
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "Ifloat ?DIV \<le> 1" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat x / ?R" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `0 < ?R` unfolding real_0_le_divide_iff by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> Ifloat ?DIV" using monotone by (rule order_trans)
+
+ have "arctan (Ifloat x) = 2 * arctan (Ifloat x / ?R)" using arctan_half unfolding numeral_2_eq_2 power_Suc2 realpow_0 real_mult_1 .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> 2 * arctan (Ifloat ?DIV)"
+ using arctan_monotone'[OF monotone] by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (Float 1 1 * ?ub_horner ?DIV)" unfolding Ifloat_mult[of "Float 1 1"] Float_num
+ using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?DIV` `Ifloat ?DIV \<le> 1`] by auto
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding ub_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_P[OF `x \<le> Float 1 1`] if_not_P[OF False] .
+ qed
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "2 < Ifloat x" unfolding le_float_def Float_num by auto
+ hence "1 \<le> Ifloat x" by auto
+ hence "0 < Ifloat x" by auto
+ hence "0 < x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+
+ let "?invx" = "float_divl prec 1 x"
+ have "0 \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)" using arctan_monotone'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`] using arctan_tan[of 0, unfolded tan_zero] by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat ?invx \<le> 1" unfolding less_float_def by (rule order_trans[OF float_divl], auto simp add: `1 \<le> Ifloat x` divide_le_eq_1_pos[OF `0 < Ifloat x`])
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat ?invx" unfolding Ifloat_0[symmetric] by (rule float_divl_lower_bound[unfolded le_float_def], auto simp add: `0 < x`)
+
+ have "1 / Ifloat x \<noteq> 0" and "0 < 1 / Ifloat x" using `0 < Ifloat x` by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (?lb_horner ?invx) \<le> arctan (Ifloat ?invx)" using arctan_0_1_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?invx` `Ifloat ?invx \<le> 1`] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> arctan (1 / Ifloat x)" unfolding Ifloat_1[symmetric] by (rule arctan_monotone', rule float_divl)
+ finally have "arctan (Ifloat x) \<le> pi / 2 - Ifloat (?lb_horner ?invx)"
+ using `0 \<le> arctan (Ifloat x)` arctan_inverse[OF `1 / Ifloat x \<noteq> 0`]
+ unfolding real_sgn_pos[OF `0 < 1 / Ifloat x`] le_diff_eq by auto
+ moreover
+ have "pi / 2 \<le> Ifloat (ub_pi prec * Float 1 -1)" unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num times_divide_eq_right mult_1_right using pi_boundaries by auto
+ ultimately
+ show ?thesis unfolding ub_arctan.simps Let_def if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 1`] if_not_P[OF False]
+ by auto
+ qed
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma arctan_boundaries:
+ "arctan (Ifloat x) \<in> {Ifloat (lb_arctan prec x) .. Ifloat (ub_arctan prec x)}"
+proof (cases "0 \<le> x")
+ case True hence "0 \<le> Ifloat x" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ show ?thesis using ub_arctan_bound'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`] lb_arctan_bound'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`] unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff by auto
+next
+ let ?mx = "-x"
+ case False hence "x < 0" and "0 \<le> Ifloat ?mx" unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+ hence bounds: "Ifloat (lb_arctan prec ?mx) \<le> arctan (Ifloat ?mx) \<and> arctan (Ifloat ?mx) \<le> Ifloat (ub_arctan prec ?mx)"
+ using ub_arctan_bound'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?mx`] lb_arctan_bound'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ?mx`] by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding Ifloat_minus arctan_minus lb_arctan.simps[where x=x] ub_arctan.simps[where x=x] Let_def if_P[OF `x < 0`]
+ unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff using bounds[unfolded Ifloat_minus arctan_minus] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_arctan: "\<forall> x lx ux. (l, u) = (lb_arctan prec lx, ub_arctan prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> arctan x \<and> arctan x \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof (rule allI, rule allI, rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x lx ux
+ assume "(l, u) = (lb_arctan prec lx, ub_arctan prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}"
+ hence l: "lb_arctan prec lx = l " and u: "ub_arctan prec ux = u" and x: "x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}" by auto
+
+ { from arctan_boundaries[of lx prec, unfolded l]
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> arctan (Ifloat lx)" by (auto simp del: lb_arctan.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> arctan x" using x by (auto intro: arctan_monotone')
+ finally have "Ifloat l \<le> arctan x" .
+ } moreover
+ { have "arctan x \<le> arctan (Ifloat ux)" using x by (auto intro: arctan_monotone')
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat u" using arctan_boundaries[of ux prec, unfolded u] by (auto simp del: ub_arctan.simps)
+ finally have "arctan x \<le> Ifloat u" .
+ } ultimately show "Ifloat l \<le> arctan x \<and> arctan x \<le> Ifloat u" ..
+qed
+
+section "Sinus and Cosinus"
+
+subsection "Compute the cosinus and sinus series"
+
+fun ub_sin_cos_aux :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float"
+and lb_sin_cos_aux :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+ "ub_sin_cos_aux prec 0 i k x = 0"
+| "ub_sin_cos_aux prec (Suc n) i k x =
+ (rapprox_rat prec 1 (int k)) - x * (lb_sin_cos_aux prec n (i + 2) (k * i * (i + 1)) x)"
+| "lb_sin_cos_aux prec 0 i k x = 0"
+| "lb_sin_cos_aux prec (Suc n) i k x =
+ (lapprox_rat prec 1 (int k)) - x * (ub_sin_cos_aux prec n (i + 2) (k * i * (i + 1)) x)"
+
+lemma cos_aux:
+ shows "Ifloat (lb_sin_cos_aux prec n 1 1 (x * x)) \<le> (\<Sum> i=0..<n. -1^i * (1/real (fact (2 * i))) * (Ifloat x)^(2 * i))" (is "?lb")
+ and "(\<Sum> i=0..<n. -1^i * (1/real (fact (2 * i))) * (Ifloat x)^(2 * i)) \<le> Ifloat (ub_sin_cos_aux prec n 1 1 (x * x))" (is "?ub")
+proof -
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (x * x)" unfolding Ifloat_mult by auto
+ let "?f n" = "fact (2 * n)"
+
+ { fix n
+ have F: "\<And>m. ((\<lambda>i. i + 2) ^ n) m = m + 2 * n" by (induct n arbitrary: m, auto)
+ have "?f (Suc n) = ?f n * ((\<lambda>i. i + 2) ^ n) 1 * (((\<lambda>i. i + 2) ^ n) 1 + 1)"
+ unfolding F by auto } note f_eq = this
+
+ from horner_bounds[where lb="lb_sin_cos_aux prec" and ub="ub_sin_cos_aux prec" and j'=0,
+ OF `0 \<le> Ifloat (x * x)` f_eq lb_sin_cos_aux.simps ub_sin_cos_aux.simps]
+ show "?lb" and "?ub" by (auto simp add: power_mult power2_eq_square[of "Ifloat x"])
+qed
+
+lemma cos_boundaries: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2"
+ shows "cos (Ifloat x) \<in> {Ifloat (lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even n) 1 1 (x * x)) .. Ifloat (ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd n) 1 1 (x * x))}"
+proof (cases "Ifloat x = 0")
+ case False hence "Ifloat x \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ hence "0 < x" and "0 < Ifloat x" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "0 < x * x" using `0 < x` unfolding less_float_def Ifloat_mult Ifloat_0
+ using mult_pos_pos[where a="Ifloat x" and b="Ifloat x"] by auto
+
+ { fix x n have "(\<Sum> i=0..<n. -1^i * (1/real (fact (2 * i))) * x^(2 * i))
+ = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even(i) then (-1 ^ (i div 2))/(real (fact i)) else 0) * x ^ i)" (is "?sum = ?ifsum")
+ proof -
+ have "?sum = ?sum + (\<Sum> j = 0 ..< n. 0)" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ (\<Sum> j = 0 ..< n. -1 ^ ((2 * j) div 2) / (real (fact (2 * j))) * x ^(2 * j)) + (\<Sum> j = 0 ..< n. 0)" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. if even i then -1 ^ (i div 2) / (real (fact i)) * x ^ i else 0)"
+ unfolding sum_split_even_odd ..
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even i then -1 ^ (i div 2) / (real (fact i)) else 0) * x ^ i)"
+ by (rule setsum_cong2) auto
+ finally show ?thesis by assumption
+ qed } note morph_to_if_power = this
+
+
+ { fix n :: nat assume "0 < n"
+ hence "0 < 2 * n" by auto
+ obtain t where "0 < t" and "t < Ifloat x" and
+ cos_eq: "cos (Ifloat x) = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even(i) then (-1 ^ (i div 2))/(real (fact i)) else 0) * (Ifloat x) ^ i)
+ + (cos (t + 1/2 * real (2 * n) * pi) / real (fact (2*n))) * (Ifloat x)^(2*n)"
+ (is "_ = ?SUM + ?rest / ?fact * ?pow")
+ using Maclaurin_cos_expansion2[OF `0 < Ifloat x` `0 < 2 * n`] by auto
+
+ have "cos t * -1^n = cos t * cos (real n * pi) + sin t * sin (real n * pi)" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = cos (t + real n * pi)" using cos_add by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = ?rest" by auto
+ finally have "cos t * -1^n = ?rest" .
+ moreover
+ have "t \<le> pi / 2" using `t < Ifloat x` and `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2` by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> cos t" using `0 < t` and cos_ge_zero by auto
+ ultimately have even: "even n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> ?rest" and odd: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> - ?rest " by auto
+
+ have "0 < ?fact" by auto
+ have "0 < ?pow" using `0 < Ifloat x` by auto
+
+ {
+ assume "even n"
+ have "Ifloat (lb_sin_cos_aux prec n 1 1 (x * x)) \<le> ?SUM"
+ unfolding morph_to_if_power[symmetric] using cos_aux by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> cos (Ifloat x)"
+ proof -
+ from even[OF `even n`] `0 < ?fact` `0 < ?pow`
+ have "0 \<le> (?rest / ?fact) * ?pow" by (metis mult_nonneg_nonneg divide_nonneg_pos less_imp_le)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding cos_eq by auto
+ qed
+ finally have "Ifloat (lb_sin_cos_aux prec n 1 1 (x * x)) \<le> cos (Ifloat x)" .
+ } note lb = this
+
+ {
+ assume "odd n"
+ have "cos (Ifloat x) \<le> ?SUM"
+ proof -
+ from `0 < ?fact` and `0 < ?pow` and odd[OF `odd n`]
+ have "0 \<le> (- ?rest) / ?fact * ?pow"
+ by (metis mult_nonneg_nonneg divide_nonneg_pos less_imp_le)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding cos_eq by auto
+ qed
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (ub_sin_cos_aux prec n 1 1 (x * x))"
+ unfolding morph_to_if_power[symmetric] using cos_aux by auto
+ finally have "cos (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_sin_cos_aux prec n 1 1 (x * x))" .
+ } note ub = this and lb
+ } note ub = this(1) and lb = this(2)
+
+ have "cos (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd n) 1 1 (x * x))" using ub[OF odd_pos[OF get_odd] get_odd] .
+ moreover have "Ifloat (lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even n) 1 1 (x * x)) \<le> cos (Ifloat x)"
+ proof (cases "0 < get_even n")
+ case True show ?thesis using lb[OF True get_even] .
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "get_even n = 0" by auto
+ have "- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat x" by (rule order_trans[OF _ `0 < Ifloat x`[THEN less_imp_le]], auto)
+ with `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2`
+ show ?thesis unfolding `get_even n = 0` lb_sin_cos_aux.simps Ifloat_minus Ifloat_0 using cos_ge_zero by auto
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+next
+ case True
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "n = 0")
+ case True
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `n = 0` get_even_def get_odd_def using `Ifloat x = 0` lapprox_rat[where x="-1" and y=1] by auto
+ next
+ case False with not0_implies_Suc obtain m where "n = Suc m" by blast
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `n = Suc m` get_even_def get_odd_def using `Ifloat x = 0` rapprox_rat[where x=1 and y=1] lapprox_rat[where x=1 and y=1] by (cases "even (Suc m)", auto)
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma sin_aux: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x"
+ shows "Ifloat (x * lb_sin_cos_aux prec n 2 1 (x * x)) \<le> (\<Sum> i=0..<n. -1^i * (1/real (fact (2 * i + 1))) * (Ifloat x)^(2 * i + 1))" (is "?lb")
+ and "(\<Sum> i=0..<n. -1^i * (1/real (fact (2 * i + 1))) * (Ifloat x)^(2 * i + 1)) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_sin_cos_aux prec n 2 1 (x * x))" (is "?ub")
+proof -
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (x * x)" unfolding Ifloat_mult by auto
+ let "?f n" = "fact (2 * n + 1)"
+
+ { fix n
+ have F: "\<And>m. ((\<lambda>i. i + 2) ^ n) m = m + 2 * n" by (induct n arbitrary: m, auto)
+ have "?f (Suc n) = ?f n * ((\<lambda>i. i + 2) ^ n) 2 * (((\<lambda>i. i + 2) ^ n) 2 + 1)"
+ unfolding F by auto } note f_eq = this
+
+ from horner_bounds[where lb="lb_sin_cos_aux prec" and ub="ub_sin_cos_aux prec" and j'=0,
+ OF `0 \<le> Ifloat (x * x)` f_eq lb_sin_cos_aux.simps ub_sin_cos_aux.simps]
+ show "?lb" and "?ub" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding Ifloat_mult
+ unfolding power_add power_one_right real_mult_assoc[symmetric] setsum_left_distrib[symmetric]
+ unfolding real_mult_commute
+ by (auto intro!: mult_left_mono simp add: power_mult power2_eq_square[of "Ifloat x"])
+qed
+
+lemma sin_boundaries: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2"
+ shows "sin (Ifloat x) \<in> {Ifloat (x * lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even n) 2 1 (x * x)) .. Ifloat (x * ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd n) 2 1 (x * x))}"
+proof (cases "Ifloat x = 0")
+ case False hence "Ifloat x \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ hence "0 < x" and "0 < Ifloat x" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "0 < x * x" using `0 < x` unfolding less_float_def Ifloat_mult Ifloat_0
+ using mult_pos_pos[where a="Ifloat x" and b="Ifloat x"] by auto
+
+ { fix x n have "(\<Sum> j = 0 ..< n. -1 ^ (((2 * j + 1) - Suc 0) div 2) / (real (fact (2 * j + 1))) * x ^(2 * j + 1))
+ = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even(i) then 0 else (-1 ^ ((i - Suc 0) div 2))/(real (fact i))) * x ^ i)" (is "?SUM = _")
+ proof -
+ have pow: "!!i. x ^ (2 * i + 1) = x * x ^ (2 * i)" by auto
+ have "?SUM = (\<Sum> j = 0 ..< n. 0) + ?SUM" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. if even i then 0 else -1 ^ ((i - Suc 0) div 2) / (real (fact i)) * x ^ i)"
+ unfolding sum_split_even_odd ..
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even i then 0 else -1 ^ ((i - Suc 0) div 2) / (real (fact i))) * x ^ i)"
+ by (rule setsum_cong2) auto
+ finally show ?thesis by assumption
+ qed } note setsum_morph = this
+
+ { fix n :: nat assume "0 < n"
+ hence "0 < 2 * n + 1" by auto
+ obtain t where "0 < t" and "t < Ifloat x" and
+ sin_eq: "sin (Ifloat x) = (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n + 1. (if even(i) then 0 else (-1 ^ ((i - Suc 0) div 2))/(real (fact i))) * (Ifloat x) ^ i)
+ + (sin (t + 1/2 * real (2 * n + 1) * pi) / real (fact (2*n + 1))) * (Ifloat x)^(2*n + 1)"
+ (is "_ = ?SUM + ?rest / ?fact * ?pow")
+ using Maclaurin_sin_expansion3[OF `0 < 2 * n + 1` `0 < Ifloat x`] by auto
+
+ have "?rest = cos t * -1^n" unfolding sin_add cos_add real_of_nat_add left_distrib right_distrib by auto
+ moreover
+ have "t \<le> pi / 2" using `t < Ifloat x` and `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2` by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> cos t" using `0 < t` and cos_ge_zero by auto
+ ultimately have even: "even n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> ?rest" and odd: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> - ?rest " by auto
+
+ have "0 < ?fact" by (rule real_of_nat_fact_gt_zero)
+ have "0 < ?pow" using `0 < Ifloat x` by (rule zero_less_power)
+
+ {
+ assume "even n"
+ have "Ifloat (x * lb_sin_cos_aux prec n 2 1 (x * x)) \<le>
+ (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even(i) then 0 else (-1 ^ ((i - Suc 0) div 2))/(real (fact i))) * (Ifloat x) ^ i)"
+ using sin_aux[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`] unfolding setsum_morph[symmetric] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> ?SUM" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> sin (Ifloat x)"
+ proof -
+ from even[OF `even n`] `0 < ?fact` `0 < ?pow`
+ have "0 \<le> (?rest / ?fact) * ?pow" by (metis mult_nonneg_nonneg divide_nonneg_pos less_imp_le)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding sin_eq by auto
+ qed
+ finally have "Ifloat (x * lb_sin_cos_aux prec n 2 1 (x * x)) \<le> sin (Ifloat x)" .
+ } note lb = this
+
+ {
+ assume "odd n"
+ have "sin (Ifloat x) \<le> ?SUM"
+ proof -
+ from `0 < ?fact` and `0 < ?pow` and odd[OF `odd n`]
+ have "0 \<le> (- ?rest) / ?fact * ?pow"
+ by (metis mult_nonneg_nonneg divide_nonneg_pos less_imp_le)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding sin_eq by auto
+ qed
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum> i = 0 ..< 2 * n. (if even(i) then 0 else (-1 ^ ((i - Suc 0) div 2))/(real (fact i))) * (Ifloat x) ^ i)"
+ by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_sin_cos_aux prec n 2 1 (x * x))"
+ using sin_aux[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x`] unfolding setsum_morph[symmetric] by auto
+ finally have "sin (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_sin_cos_aux prec n 2 1 (x * x))" .
+ } note ub = this and lb
+ } note ub = this(1) and lb = this(2)
+
+ have "sin (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd n) 2 1 (x * x))" using ub[OF odd_pos[OF get_odd] get_odd] .
+ moreover have "Ifloat (x * lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even n) 2 1 (x * x)) \<le> sin (Ifloat x)"
+ proof (cases "0 < get_even n")
+ case True show ?thesis using lb[OF True get_even] .
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "get_even n = 0" by auto
+ with `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2` `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ show ?thesis unfolding `get_even n = 0` ub_sin_cos_aux.simps Ifloat_minus Ifloat_0 using sin_ge_zero by auto
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+next
+ case True
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "n = 0")
+ case True
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `n = 0` get_even_def get_odd_def using `Ifloat x = 0` lapprox_rat[where x="-1" and y=1] by auto
+ next
+ case False with not0_implies_Suc obtain m where "n = Suc m" by blast
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `n = Suc m` get_even_def get_odd_def using `Ifloat x = 0` rapprox_rat[where x=1 and y=1] lapprox_rat[where x=1 and y=1] by (cases "even (Suc m)", auto)
+ qed
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute the cosinus in the entire domain"
+
+definition lb_cos :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"lb_cos prec x = (let
+ horner = \<lambda> x. lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 1 (x * x) ;
+ half = \<lambda> x. if x < 0 then - 1 else Float 1 1 * x * x - 1
+ in if x < Float 1 -1 then horner x
+else if x < 1 then half (horner (x * Float 1 -1))
+ else half (half (horner (x * Float 1 -2))))"
+
+definition ub_cos :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"ub_cos prec x = (let
+ horner = \<lambda> x. ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 1 (x * x) ;
+ half = \<lambda> x. Float 1 1 * x * x - 1
+ in if x < Float 1 -1 then horner x
+else if x < 1 then half (horner (x * Float 1 -1))
+ else half (half (horner (x * Float 1 -2))))"
+
+definition bnds_cos :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float * float" where
+"bnds_cos prec lx ux = (let lpi = lb_pi prec
+ in if lx < -lpi \<or> ux > lpi then (Float -1 0, Float 1 0)
+ else if ux \<le> 0 then (lb_cos prec (-lx), ub_cos prec (-ux))
+ else if 0 \<le> lx then (lb_cos prec ux, ub_cos prec lx)
+ else (min (lb_cos prec (-lx)) (lb_cos prec ux), Float 1 0))"
+
+lemma lb_cos: assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi"
+ shows "cos (Ifloat x) \<in> {Ifloat (lb_cos prec x) .. Ifloat (ub_cos prec x)}" (is "?cos x \<in> { Ifloat (?lb x) .. Ifloat (?ub x) }")
+proof -
+ { fix x :: real
+ have "cos x = cos (x / 2 + x / 2)" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = cos (x / 2) * cos (x / 2) + sin (x / 2) * sin (x / 2) - sin (x / 2) * sin (x / 2) + cos (x / 2) * cos (x / 2) - 1"
+ unfolding cos_add by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = 2 * cos (x / 2) * cos (x / 2) - 1" by algebra
+ finally have "cos x = 2 * cos (x / 2) * cos (x / 2) - 1" .
+ } note x_half = this[symmetric]
+
+ have "\<not> x < 0" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ let "?ub_horner x" = "ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 1 (x * x)"
+ let "?lb_horner x" = "lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 1 1 (x * x)"
+ let "?ub_half x" = "Float 1 1 * x * x - 1"
+ let "?lb_half x" = "if x < 0 then - 1 else Float 1 1 * x * x - 1"
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x < Float 1 -1")
+ case True hence "Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2" unfolding less_float_def using pi_ge_two by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_cos_def[where x=x] ub_cos_def[where x=x] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_P[OF `x < Float 1 -1`] Let_def
+ using cos_boundaries[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2`] .
+ next
+ case False
+
+ { fix y x :: float let ?x2 = "Ifloat (x * Float 1 -1)"
+ assume "Ifloat y \<le> cos ?x2" and "-pi \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi"
+ hence "- (pi / 2) \<le> ?x2" and "?x2 \<le> pi / 2" using pi_ge_two unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> cos ?x2" by (rule cos_ge_zero)
+
+ have "Ifloat (?lb_half y) \<le> cos (Ifloat x)"
+ proof (cases "y < 0")
+ case True show ?thesis using cos_ge_minus_one unfolding if_P[OF True] by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "0 \<le> Ifloat y" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ from mult_mono[OF `Ifloat y \<le> cos ?x2` `Ifloat y \<le> cos ?x2` `0 \<le> cos ?x2` this]
+ have "Ifloat y * Ifloat y \<le> cos ?x2 * cos ?x2" .
+ hence "2 * Ifloat y * Ifloat y \<le> 2 * cos ?x2 * cos ?x2" by auto
+ hence "2 * Ifloat y * Ifloat y - 1 \<le> 2 * cos (Ifloat x / 2) * cos (Ifloat x / 2) - 1" unfolding Float_num Ifloat_mult by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding if_not_P[OF False] x_half Float_num Ifloat_mult Ifloat_sub by auto
+ qed
+ } note lb_half = this
+
+ { fix y x :: float let ?x2 = "Ifloat (x * Float 1 -1)"
+ assume ub: "cos ?x2 \<le> Ifloat y" and "- pi \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi"
+ hence "- (pi / 2) \<le> ?x2" and "?x2 \<le> pi / 2" using pi_ge_two unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> cos ?x2" by (rule cos_ge_zero)
+
+ have "cos (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (?ub_half y)"
+ proof -
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat y" using `0 \<le> cos ?x2` ub by (rule order_trans)
+ from mult_mono[OF ub ub this `0 \<le> cos ?x2`]
+ have "cos ?x2 * cos ?x2 \<le> Ifloat y * Ifloat y" .
+ hence "2 * cos ?x2 * cos ?x2 \<le> 2 * Ifloat y * Ifloat y" by auto
+ hence "2 * cos (Ifloat x / 2) * cos (Ifloat x / 2) - 1 \<le> 2 * Ifloat y * Ifloat y - 1" unfolding Float_num Ifloat_mult by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding x_half Ifloat_mult Float_num Ifloat_sub by auto
+ qed
+ } note ub_half = this
+
+ let ?x2 = "x * Float 1 -1"
+ let ?x4 = "x * Float 1 -1 * Float 1 -1"
+
+ have "-pi \<le> Ifloat x" using pi_ge_zero[THEN le_imp_neg_le, unfolded minus_zero] `0 \<le> Ifloat x` by (rule order_trans)
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x < 1")
+ case True hence "Ifloat x \<le> 1" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat ?x2" and "Ifloat ?x2 \<le> pi / 2" using pi_ge_two `0 \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num using assms by auto
+ from cos_boundaries[OF this]
+ have lb: "Ifloat (?lb_horner ?x2) \<le> ?cos ?x2" and ub: "?cos ?x2 \<le> Ifloat (?ub_horner ?x2)" by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (?lb x) \<le> ?cos x"
+ proof -
+ from lb_half[OF lb `-pi \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`]
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_cos_def[where x=x] Let_def using `\<not> x < 0` `\<not> x < Float 1 -1` `x < 1` by auto
+ qed
+ moreover have "?cos x \<le> Ifloat (?ub x)"
+ proof -
+ from ub_half[OF ub `-pi \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`]
+ show ?thesis unfolding ub_cos_def[where x=x] Let_def using `\<not> x < 0` `\<not> x < Float 1 -1` `x < 1` by auto
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat ?x4" and "Ifloat ?x4 \<le> pi / 2" using pi_ge_two `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi` unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num by auto
+ from cos_boundaries[OF this]
+ have lb: "Ifloat (?lb_horner ?x4) \<le> ?cos ?x4" and ub: "?cos ?x4 \<le> Ifloat (?ub_horner ?x4)" by auto
+
+ have eq_4: "?x2 * Float 1 -1 = x * Float 1 -2" by (cases x, auto simp add: times_float.simps)
+
+ have "Ifloat (?lb x) \<le> ?cos x"
+ proof -
+ have "-pi \<le> Ifloat ?x2" and "Ifloat ?x2 \<le> pi" unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num using pi_ge_two `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi` by auto
+ from lb_half[OF lb_half[OF lb this] `-pi \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`, unfolded eq_4]
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_cos_def[where x=x] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 1`] Let_def .
+ qed
+ moreover have "?cos x \<le> Ifloat (?ub x)"
+ proof -
+ have "-pi \<le> Ifloat ?x2" and "Ifloat ?x2 \<le> pi" unfolding Ifloat_mult Float_num using pi_ge_two `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi` by auto
+ from ub_half[OF ub_half[OF ub this] `-pi \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`, unfolded eq_4]
+ show ?thesis unfolding ub_cos_def[where x=x] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 1`] Let_def .
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+ qed
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma lb_cos_minus: assumes "-pi \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> 0"
+ shows "cos (Ifloat (-x)) \<in> {Ifloat (lb_cos prec (-x)) .. Ifloat (ub_cos prec (-x))}"
+proof -
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (-x)" and "Ifloat (-x) \<le> pi" using `-pi \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> 0` by auto
+ from lb_cos[OF this] show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_cos: "\<forall> x lx ux. (l, u) = bnds_cos prec lx ux \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> cos x \<and> cos x \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof (rule allI, rule allI, rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x lx ux
+ assume "(l, u) = bnds_cos prec lx ux \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}"
+ hence bnds: "(l, u) = bnds_cos prec lx ux" and x: "x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}" by auto
+
+ let ?lpi = "lb_pi prec"
+ have [intro!]: "Ifloat lx \<le> Ifloat ux" using x by auto
+ hence "lx \<le> ux" unfolding le_float_def .
+
+ show "Ifloat l \<le> cos x \<and> cos x \<le> Ifloat u"
+ proof (cases "lx < -?lpi \<or> ux > ?lpi")
+ case True
+ show ?thesis using bnds unfolding bnds_cos_def if_P[OF True] Let_def using cos_le_one cos_ge_minus_one by auto
+ next
+ case False note not_out = this
+ hence lpi_lx: "- Ifloat ?lpi \<le> Ifloat lx" and lpi_ux: "Ifloat ux \<le> Ifloat ?lpi" unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+
+ from pi_boundaries[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct1, THEN le_imp_neg_le] lpi_lx
+ have "- pi \<le> Ifloat lx" by (rule order_trans)
+ hence "- pi \<le> x" and "- pi \<le> Ifloat ux" and "x \<le> Ifloat ux" using x by auto
+
+ from lpi_ux pi_boundaries[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct1]
+ have "Ifloat ux \<le> pi" by (rule order_trans)
+ hence "x \<le> pi" and "Ifloat lx \<le> pi" and "Ifloat lx \<le> x" using x by auto
+
+ note lb_cos_minus_bottom = lb_cos_minus[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct1]
+ note lb_cos_minus_top = lb_cos_minus[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct2]
+ note lb_cos_bottom = lb_cos[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct1]
+ note lb_cos_top = lb_cos[unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct2]
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "ux \<le> 0")
+ case True hence "Ifloat ux \<le> 0" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ hence "x \<le> 0" and "Ifloat lx \<le> 0" using x by auto
+
+ { have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec (-lx)) \<le> cos (Ifloat (-lx))" using lb_cos_minus_bottom[OF `-pi \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> 0`] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> cos x" unfolding Ifloat_minus cos_minus using cos_monotone_minus_pi_0'[OF `- pi \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> x` `x \<le> 0`] .
+ finally have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec (-lx)) \<le> cos x" . }
+ moreover
+ { have "cos x \<le> cos (Ifloat (-ux))" unfolding Ifloat_minus cos_minus using cos_monotone_minus_pi_0'[OF `- pi \<le> x` `x \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> 0`] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec (-ux))" using lb_cos_minus_top[OF `-pi \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> 0`] .
+ finally have "cos x \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec (-ux))" . }
+ ultimately show ?thesis using bnds unfolding bnds_cos_def Let_def if_not_P[OF not_out] if_P[OF True] by auto
+ next
+ case False note not_ux = this
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "0 \<le> lx")
+ case True hence "0 \<le> Ifloat lx" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> x" and "0 \<le> Ifloat ux" using x by auto
+
+ { have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec ux) \<le> cos (Ifloat ux)" using lb_cos_bottom[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> pi`] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> cos x" using cos_monotone_0_pi'[OF `0 \<le> x` `x \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> pi`] .
+ finally have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec ux) \<le> cos x" . }
+ moreover
+ { have "cos x \<le> cos (Ifloat lx)" using cos_monotone_0_pi'[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> x` `x \<le> pi`] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec lx)" using lb_cos_top[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> pi`] .
+ finally have "cos x \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec lx)" . }
+ ultimately show ?thesis using bnds unfolding bnds_cos_def Let_def if_not_P[OF not_out] if_not_P[OF not_ux] if_P[OF True] by auto
+ next
+ case False with not_ux
+ have "Ifloat lx \<le> 0" and "0 \<le> Ifloat ux" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (min (lb_cos prec (-lx)) (lb_cos prec ux)) \<le> cos x"
+ proof (cases "x \<le> 0")
+ case True
+ have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec (-lx)) \<le> cos (Ifloat (-lx))" using lb_cos_minus_bottom[OF `-pi \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> 0`] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> cos x" unfolding Ifloat_minus cos_minus using cos_monotone_minus_pi_0'[OF `- pi \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> x` `x \<le> 0`] .
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding Ifloat_min by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "0 \<le> x" by auto
+ have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec ux) \<le> cos (Ifloat ux)" using lb_cos_bottom[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> pi`] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> cos x" using cos_monotone_0_pi'[OF `0 \<le> x` `x \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> pi`] .
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding Ifloat_min by auto
+ qed
+ moreover have "cos x \<le> Ifloat (Float 1 0)" by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis using bnds unfolding bnds_cos_def Let_def if_not_P[OF not_out] if_not_P[OF not_ux] if_not_P[OF False] by auto
+ qed
+ qed
+ qed
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute the sinus in the entire domain"
+
+function lb_sin :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" and ub_sin :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"lb_sin prec x = (let sqr_diff = \<lambda> x. if x > 1 then 0 else 1 - x * x
+ in if x < 0 then - ub_sin prec (- x)
+else if x \<le> Float 1 -1 then x * lb_sin_cos_aux prec (get_even (prec div 4 + 1)) 2 1 (x * x)
+ else the (lb_sqrt prec (sqr_diff (ub_cos prec x))))" |
+
+"ub_sin prec x = (let sqr_diff = \<lambda> x. if x < 0 then 1 else 1 - x * x
+ in if x < 0 then - lb_sin prec (- x)
+else if x \<le> Float 1 -1 then x * ub_sin_cos_aux prec (get_odd (prec div 4 + 1)) 2 1 (x * x)
+ else the (ub_sqrt prec (sqr_diff (lb_cos prec x))))"
+by pat_completeness auto
+termination by (relation "measure (\<lambda> v. let (prec, x) = sum_case id id v in (if x < 0 then 1 else 0))", auto simp add: less_float_def)
+
+definition bnds_sin :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float * float" where
+"bnds_sin prec lx ux = (let
+ lpi = lb_pi prec ;
+ half_pi = lpi * Float 1 -1
+ in if lx \<le> - half_pi \<or> half_pi \<le> ux then (Float -1 0, Float 1 0)
+ else (lb_sin prec lx, ub_sin prec ux))"
+
+lemma lb_sin: assumes "- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2"
+ shows "sin (Ifloat x) \<in> { Ifloat (lb_sin prec x) .. Ifloat (ub_sin prec x) }" (is "?sin x \<in> { ?lb x .. ?ub x}")
+proof -
+ { fix x :: float assume "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2"
+ hence "\<not> (x < 0)" and "- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def using pi_ge_two by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat x \<le> pi" using `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2` using pi_ge_two by auto
+
+ have "?sin x \<in> { ?lb x .. ?ub x}"
+ proof (cases "x \<le> Float 1 -1")
+ case True from sin_boundaries[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2`]
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_sin.simps[of prec x] ub_sin.simps[of prec x] if_not_P[OF `\<not> (x < 0)`] if_P[OF True] Let_def .
+ next
+ case False
+ have "0 \<le> cos (Ifloat x)" using cos_ge_zero[OF _ `Ifloat x \<le> pi /2`] `0 \<le> Ifloat x` pi_ge_two by auto
+ have "0 \<le> sin (Ifloat x)" using `0 \<le> Ifloat x` and `Ifloat x \<le> pi / 2` using sin_ge_zero by auto
+
+ have "?sin x \<le> ?ub x"
+ proof (cases "lb_cos prec x < 0")
+ case True
+ have "?sin x \<le> 1" using sin_le_one .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_sqrt prec 1))" using ub_sqrt_lower_bound[where prec=prec and x=1] unfolding Ifloat_1 by auto
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding ub_sin.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> (x < 0)`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_P[OF True] Let_def .
+ next
+ case False hence "0 \<le> Ifloat (lb_cos prec x)" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+
+ have "sin (Ifloat x) = sqrt (1 - cos (Ifloat x) ^ 2)" unfolding sin_squared_eq[symmetric] real_sqrt_abs using `0 \<le> sin (Ifloat x)` by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> sqrt (Ifloat (1 - lb_cos prec x * lb_cos prec x))"
+ proof (rule real_sqrt_le_mono)
+ have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec x * lb_cos prec x) \<le> cos (Ifloat x) ^ 2" unfolding numeral_2_eq_2 power_Suc2 realpow_0 Ifloat_mult
+ using `0 \<le> Ifloat (lb_cos prec x)` lb_cos[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`] `0 \<le> cos (Ifloat x)` by(auto intro!: mult_mono)
+ thus "1 - cos (Ifloat x) ^ 2 \<le> Ifloat (1 - lb_cos prec x * lb_cos prec x)" unfolding Ifloat_sub Ifloat_1 by auto
+ qed
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_sqrt prec (1 - lb_cos prec x * lb_cos prec x)))"
+ proof (rule ub_sqrt_lower_bound)
+ have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec x) \<le> cos (Ifloat x)" using lb_cos[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`] by auto
+ from mult_mono[OF order_trans[OF this cos_le_one] order_trans[OF this cos_le_one]]
+ have "Ifloat (lb_cos prec x) * Ifloat (lb_cos prec x) \<le> 1" using `0 \<le> Ifloat (lb_cos prec x)` by auto
+ thus "0 \<le> Ifloat (1 - lb_cos prec x * lb_cos prec x)" by auto
+ qed
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding ub_sin.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> (x < 0)`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF False] Let_def .
+ qed
+ moreover
+ have "?lb x \<le> ?sin x"
+ proof (cases "1 < ub_cos prec x")
+ case True
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_sin.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> (x < 0)`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_P[OF True] Let_def
+ by (rule order_trans[OF _ sin_ge_zero[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`]])
+ (auto simp add: lb_sqrt_upper_bound[where prec=prec and x=0, unfolded Ifloat_0 real_sqrt_zero])
+ next
+ case False hence "Ifloat (ub_cos prec x) \<le> 1" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec x)" using order_trans[OF `0 \<le> cos (Ifloat x)`] lb_cos `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi` by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (the (lb_sqrt prec (1 - ub_cos prec x * ub_cos prec x))) \<le> sqrt (Ifloat (1 - ub_cos prec x * ub_cos prec x))"
+ proof (rule lb_sqrt_upper_bound)
+ from mult_mono[OF `Ifloat (ub_cos prec x) \<le> 1` `Ifloat (ub_cos prec x) \<le> 1`] `0 \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec x)`
+ have "Ifloat (ub_cos prec x) * Ifloat (ub_cos prec x) \<le> 1" by auto
+ thus "0 \<le> Ifloat (1 - ub_cos prec x * ub_cos prec x)" by auto
+ qed
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> sqrt (1 - cos (Ifloat x) ^ 2)"
+ proof (rule real_sqrt_le_mono)
+ have "cos (Ifloat x) ^ 2 \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec x * ub_cos prec x)" unfolding numeral_2_eq_2 power_Suc2 realpow_0 Ifloat_mult
+ using `0 \<le> Ifloat (ub_cos prec x)` lb_cos[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x \<le> pi`] `0 \<le> cos (Ifloat x)` by(auto intro!: mult_mono)
+ thus "Ifloat (1 - ub_cos prec x * ub_cos prec x) \<le> 1 - cos (Ifloat x) ^ 2" unfolding Ifloat_sub Ifloat_1 by auto
+ qed
+ also have "\<dots> = sin (Ifloat x)" unfolding sin_squared_eq[symmetric] real_sqrt_abs using `0 \<le> sin (Ifloat x)` by auto
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding lb_sin.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> (x < 0)`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> Float 1 -1`] if_not_P[OF False] Let_def .
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+ qed
+ } note for_pos = this
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x < 0")
+ case True
+ hence "0 \<le> Ifloat (-x)" and "Ifloat (- x) \<le> pi / 2" using `-(pi/2) \<le> Ifloat x` unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ from for_pos[OF this]
+ show ?thesis unfolding Ifloat_minus sin_minus lb_sin.simps[of prec x] ub_sin.simps[of prec x] if_P[OF True] Let_def atLeastAtMost_iff by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "0 \<le> Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ from for_pos[OF this `Ifloat x \<le> pi /2`]
+ show ?thesis .
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_sin: "\<forall> x lx ux. (l, u) = bnds_sin prec lx ux \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> sin x \<and> sin x \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof (rule allI, rule allI, rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x lx ux
+ assume "(l, u) = bnds_sin prec lx ux \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}"
+ hence bnds: "(l, u) = bnds_sin prec lx ux" and x: "x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}" by auto
+ show "Ifloat l \<le> sin x \<and> sin x \<le> Ifloat u"
+ proof (cases "lx \<le> - (lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1) \<or> lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1 \<le> ux")
+ case True show ?thesis using bnds unfolding bnds_sin_def if_P[OF True] Let_def by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "- lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1 \<le> lx" and "ux \<le> lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ moreover have "Ifloat (lb_pi prec * Float 1 -1) \<le> pi / 2" unfolding Ifloat_mult using pi_boundaries by auto
+ ultimately have "- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat lx" and "Ifloat ux \<le> pi / 2" and "Ifloat lx \<le> Ifloat ux" unfolding le_float_def using x by auto
+ hence "- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat ux" and "Ifloat lx \<le> pi / 2" by auto
+
+ have "- (pi / 2) \<le> x""x \<le> pi / 2" using `Ifloat ux \<le> pi / 2` `- (pi /2) \<le> Ifloat lx` x by auto
+
+ { have "Ifloat (lb_sin prec lx) \<le> sin (Ifloat lx)" using lb_sin[OF `- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat lx` `Ifloat lx \<le> pi / 2`] unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> sin x" using sin_monotone_2pi' `- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat lx` x `x \<le> pi / 2` by auto
+ finally have "Ifloat (lb_sin prec lx) \<le> sin x" . }
+ moreover
+ { have "sin x \<le> sin (Ifloat ux)" using sin_monotone_2pi' `- (pi / 2) \<le> x` x `Ifloat ux \<le> pi / 2` by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (ub_sin prec ux)" using lb_sin[OF `- (pi / 2) \<le> Ifloat ux` `Ifloat ux \<le> pi / 2`] unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff by auto
+ finally have "sin x \<le> Ifloat (ub_sin prec ux)" . }
+ ultimately
+ show ?thesis using bnds unfolding bnds_sin_def if_not_P[OF False] Let_def by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+section "Exponential function"
+
+subsection "Compute the series of the exponential function"
+
+fun ub_exp_horner :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" and lb_exp_horner :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"ub_exp_horner prec 0 i k x = 0" |
+"ub_exp_horner prec (Suc n) i k x = rapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) + x * lb_exp_horner prec n (i + 1) (k * i) x" |
+"lb_exp_horner prec 0 i k x = 0" |
+"lb_exp_horner prec (Suc n) i k x = lapprox_rat prec 1 (int k) + x * ub_exp_horner prec n (i + 1) (k * i) x"
+
+lemma bnds_exp_horner: assumes "Ifloat x \<le> 0"
+ shows "exp (Ifloat x) \<in> { Ifloat (lb_exp_horner prec (get_even n) 1 1 x) .. Ifloat (ub_exp_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 1 x) }"
+proof -
+ { fix n
+ have F: "\<And> m. ((\<lambda>i. i + 1) ^ n) m = n + m" by (induct n, auto)
+ have "fact (Suc n) = fact n * ((\<lambda>i. i + 1) ^ n) 1" unfolding F by auto } note f_eq = this
+
+ note bounds = horner_bounds_nonpos[where f="fact" and lb="lb_exp_horner prec" and ub="ub_exp_horner prec" and j'=0 and s=1,
+ OF assms f_eq lb_exp_horner.simps ub_exp_horner.simps]
+
+ { have "Ifloat (lb_exp_horner prec (get_even n) 1 1 x) \<le> (\<Sum>j = 0..<get_even n. 1 / real (fact j) * Ifloat x ^ j)"
+ using bounds(1) by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> exp (Ifloat x)"
+ proof -
+ obtain t where "\<bar>t\<bar> \<le> \<bar>Ifloat x\<bar>" and "exp (Ifloat x) = (\<Sum>m = 0..<get_even n. (Ifloat x) ^ m / real (fact m)) + exp t / real (fact (get_even n)) * (Ifloat x) ^ (get_even n)"
+ using Maclaurin_exp_le by blast
+ moreover have "0 \<le> exp t / real (fact (get_even n)) * (Ifloat x) ^ (get_even n)"
+ by (auto intro!: mult_nonneg_nonneg divide_nonneg_pos simp add: get_even zero_le_even_power exp_gt_zero)
+ ultimately show ?thesis
+ using get_odd exp_gt_zero by (auto intro!: pordered_cancel_semiring_class.mult_nonneg_nonneg)
+ qed
+ finally have "Ifloat (lb_exp_horner prec (get_even n) 1 1 x) \<le> exp (Ifloat x)" .
+ } moreover
+ {
+ have x_less_zero: "Ifloat x ^ get_odd n \<le> 0"
+ proof (cases "Ifloat x = 0")
+ case True
+ have "(get_odd n) \<noteq> 0" using get_odd[THEN odd_pos] by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding True power_0_left by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "Ifloat x < 0" using `Ifloat x \<le> 0` by auto
+ show ?thesis by (rule less_imp_le, auto simp add: power_less_zero_eq get_odd `Ifloat x < 0`)
+ qed
+
+ obtain t where "\<bar>t\<bar> \<le> \<bar>Ifloat x\<bar>" and "exp (Ifloat x) = (\<Sum>m = 0..<get_odd n. (Ifloat x) ^ m / real (fact m)) + exp t / real (fact (get_odd n)) * (Ifloat x) ^ (get_odd n)"
+ using Maclaurin_exp_le by blast
+ moreover have "exp t / real (fact (get_odd n)) * (Ifloat x) ^ (get_odd n) \<le> 0"
+ by (auto intro!: mult_nonneg_nonpos divide_nonpos_pos simp add: x_less_zero exp_gt_zero)
+ ultimately have "exp (Ifloat x) \<le> (\<Sum>j = 0..<get_odd n. 1 / real (fact j) * Ifloat x ^ j)"
+ using get_odd exp_gt_zero by (auto intro!: pordered_cancel_semiring_class.mult_nonneg_nonneg)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (ub_exp_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 1 x)"
+ using bounds(2) by auto
+ finally have "exp (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_exp_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 1 x)" .
+ } ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute the exponential function on the entire domain"
+
+function ub_exp :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" and lb_exp :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"lb_exp prec x = (if 0 < x then float_divl prec 1 (ub_exp prec (-x))
+ else let
+ horner = (\<lambda> x. let y = lb_exp_horner prec (get_even (prec + 2)) 1 1 x in if y \<le> 0 then Float 1 -2 else y)
+ in if x < - 1 then (case floor_fl x of (Float m e) \<Rightarrow> (horner (float_divl prec x (- Float m e))) ^ (nat (-m) * 2 ^ nat e))
+ else horner x)" |
+"ub_exp prec x = (if 0 < x then float_divr prec 1 (lb_exp prec (-x))
+ else if x < - 1 then (case floor_fl x of (Float m e) \<Rightarrow>
+ (ub_exp_horner prec (get_odd (prec + 2)) 1 1 (float_divr prec x (- Float m e))) ^ (nat (-m) * 2 ^ nat e))
+ else ub_exp_horner prec (get_odd (prec + 2)) 1 1 x)"
+by pat_completeness auto
+termination by (relation "measure (\<lambda> v. let (prec, x) = sum_case id id v in (if 0 < x then 1 else 0))", auto simp add: less_float_def)
+
+lemma exp_m1_ge_quarter: "(1 / 4 :: real) \<le> exp (- 1)"
+proof -
+ have eq4: "4 = Suc (Suc (Suc (Suc 0)))" by auto
+
+ have "1 / 4 = Ifloat (Float 1 -2)" unfolding Float_num by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (lb_exp_horner 1 (get_even 4) 1 1 (- 1))"
+ unfolding get_even_def eq4
+ by (auto simp add: lapprox_posrat_def rapprox_posrat_def normfloat.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> exp (Ifloat (- 1))" using bnds_exp_horner[where x="- 1"] by auto
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding Ifloat_minus Ifloat_1 .
+qed
+
+lemma lb_exp_pos: assumes "\<not> 0 < x" shows "0 < lb_exp prec x"
+proof -
+ let "?lb_horner x" = "lb_exp_horner prec (get_even (prec + 2)) 1 1 x"
+ let "?horner x" = "let y = ?lb_horner x in if y \<le> 0 then Float 1 -2 else y"
+ have pos_horner: "\<And> x. 0 < ?horner x" unfolding Let_def by (cases "?lb_horner x \<le> 0", auto simp add: le_float_def less_float_def)
+ moreover { fix x :: float fix num :: nat
+ have "0 < Ifloat (?horner x) ^ num" using `0 < ?horner x`[unfolded less_float_def Ifloat_0] by (rule zero_less_power)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifloat ((?horner x) ^ num)" using float_power by auto
+ finally have "0 < Ifloat ((?horner x) ^ num)" .
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thesis
+ unfolding lb_exp.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> 0 < x`] Let_def by (cases "floor_fl x", cases "x < - 1", auto simp add: le_float_def less_float_def normfloat)
+qed
+
+lemma exp_boundaries': assumes "x \<le> 0"
+ shows "exp (Ifloat x) \<in> { Ifloat (lb_exp prec x) .. Ifloat (ub_exp prec x)}"
+proof -
+ let "?lb_exp_horner x" = "lb_exp_horner prec (get_even (prec + 2)) 1 1 x"
+ let "?ub_exp_horner x" = "ub_exp_horner prec (get_odd (prec + 2)) 1 1 x"
+
+ have "Ifloat x \<le> 0" and "\<not> x > 0" using `x \<le> 0` unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "x < - 1")
+ case False hence "- 1 \<le> Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "?lb_exp_horner x \<le> 0")
+ from `\<not> x < - 1` have "- 1 \<le> Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ hence "exp (- 1) \<le> exp (Ifloat x)" unfolding exp_le_cancel_iff .
+ from order_trans[OF exp_m1_ge_quarter this]
+ have "Ifloat (Float 1 -2) \<le> exp (Ifloat x)" unfolding Float_num .
+ moreover case True
+ ultimately show ?thesis using bnds_exp_horner `Ifloat x \<le> 0` `\<not> x > 0` `\<not> x < - 1` by auto
+ next
+ case False thus ?thesis using bnds_exp_horner `Ifloat x \<le> 0` `\<not> x > 0` `\<not> x < - 1` by (auto simp add: Let_def)
+ qed
+ next
+ case True
+
+ obtain m e where Float_floor: "floor_fl x = Float m e" by (cases "floor_fl x", auto)
+ let ?num = "nat (- m) * 2 ^ nat e"
+
+ have "Ifloat (floor_fl x) < - 1" using floor_fl `x < - 1` unfolding le_float_def less_float_def Ifloat_minus Ifloat_1 by (rule order_le_less_trans)
+ hence "Ifloat (floor_fl x) < 0" unfolding Float_floor Ifloat.simps using zero_less_pow2[of xe] by auto
+ hence "m < 0"
+ unfolding less_float_def Ifloat_0 Float_floor Ifloat.simps
+ unfolding pos_prod_lt[OF zero_less_pow2[of e], unfolded real_mult_commute] by auto
+ hence "1 \<le> - m" by auto
+ hence "0 < nat (- m)" by auto
+ moreover
+ have "0 \<le> e" using floor_pos_exp Float_floor[symmetric] by auto
+ hence "(0::nat) < 2 ^ nat e" by auto
+ ultimately have "0 < ?num" by auto
+ hence "real ?num \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ have e_nat: "int (nat e) = e" using `0 \<le> e` by auto
+ have num_eq: "real ?num = Ifloat (- floor_fl x)" using `0 < nat (- m)`
+ unfolding Float_floor Ifloat_minus Ifloat.simps real_of_nat_mult pow2_int[of "nat e", unfolded e_nat] realpow_real_of_nat[symmetric] by auto
+ have "0 < - floor_fl x" using `0 < ?num`[unfolded real_of_nat_less_iff[symmetric]] unfolding less_float_def num_eq[symmetric] Ifloat_0 real_of_nat_zero .
+ hence "Ifloat (floor_fl x) < 0" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+
+ have "exp (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_exp prec x)"
+ proof -
+ have div_less_zero: "Ifloat (float_divr prec x (- floor_fl x)) \<le> 0"
+ using float_divr_nonpos_pos_upper_bound[OF `x \<le> 0` `0 < - floor_fl x`] unfolding le_float_def Ifloat_0 .
+
+ have "exp (Ifloat x) = exp (real ?num * (Ifloat x / real ?num))" using `real ?num \<noteq> 0` by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = exp (Ifloat x / real ?num) ^ ?num" unfolding exp_real_of_nat_mult ..
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> exp (Ifloat (float_divr prec x (- floor_fl x))) ^ ?num" unfolding num_eq
+ by (rule power_mono, rule exp_le_cancel_iff[THEN iffD2], rule float_divr) auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat ((?ub_exp_horner (float_divr prec x (- floor_fl x))) ^ ?num)" unfolding float_power
+ by (rule power_mono, rule bnds_exp_horner[OF div_less_zero, unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct2], auto)
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding ub_exp.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> 0 < x`] if_P[OF `x < - 1`] float.cases Float_floor Let_def .
+ qed
+ moreover
+ have "Ifloat (lb_exp prec x) \<le> exp (Ifloat x)"
+ proof -
+ let ?divl = "float_divl prec x (- Float m e)"
+ let ?horner = "?lb_exp_horner ?divl"
+
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "?horner \<le> 0")
+ case False hence "0 \<le> Ifloat ?horner" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+
+ have div_less_zero: "Ifloat (float_divl prec x (- floor_fl x)) \<le> 0"
+ using `Ifloat (floor_fl x) < 0` `Ifloat x \<le> 0` by (auto intro!: order_trans[OF float_divl] divide_nonpos_neg)
+
+ have "Ifloat ((?lb_exp_horner (float_divl prec x (- floor_fl x))) ^ ?num) \<le>
+ exp (Ifloat (float_divl prec x (- floor_fl x))) ^ ?num" unfolding float_power
+ using `0 \<le> Ifloat ?horner`[unfolded Float_floor[symmetric]] bnds_exp_horner[OF div_less_zero, unfolded atLeastAtMost_iff, THEN conjunct1] by (auto intro!: power_mono)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> exp (Ifloat x / real ?num) ^ ?num" unfolding num_eq
+ using float_divl by (auto intro!: power_mono simp del: Ifloat_minus)
+ also have "\<dots> = exp (real ?num * (Ifloat x / real ?num))" unfolding exp_real_of_nat_mult ..
+ also have "\<dots> = exp (Ifloat x)" using `real ?num \<noteq> 0` by auto
+ finally show ?thesis
+ unfolding lb_exp.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> 0 < x`] if_P[OF `x < - 1`] float.cases Float_floor Let_def if_not_P[OF False] by auto
+ next
+ case True
+ have "Ifloat (floor_fl x) \<noteq> 0" and "Ifloat (floor_fl x) \<le> 0" using `Ifloat (floor_fl x) < 0` by auto
+ from divide_right_mono_neg[OF floor_fl[of x] `Ifloat (floor_fl x) \<le> 0`, unfolded divide_self[OF `Ifloat (floor_fl x) \<noteq> 0`]]
+ have "- 1 \<le> Ifloat x / Ifloat (- floor_fl x)" unfolding Ifloat_minus by auto
+ from order_trans[OF exp_m1_ge_quarter this[unfolded exp_le_cancel_iff[where x="- 1", symmetric]]]
+ have "Ifloat (Float 1 -2) \<le> exp (Ifloat x / Ifloat (- floor_fl x))" unfolding Float_num .
+ hence "Ifloat (Float 1 -2) ^ ?num \<le> exp (Ifloat x / Ifloat (- floor_fl x)) ^ ?num"
+ by (auto intro!: power_mono simp add: Float_num)
+ also have "\<dots> = exp (Ifloat x)" unfolding num_eq exp_real_of_nat_mult[symmetric] using `Ifloat (floor_fl x) \<noteq> 0` by auto
+ finally show ?thesis
+ unfolding lb_exp.simps if_not_P[OF `\<not> 0 < x`] if_P[OF `x < - 1`] float.cases Float_floor Let_def if_P[OF True] float_power .
+ qed
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma exp_boundaries: "exp (Ifloat x) \<in> { Ifloat (lb_exp prec x) .. Ifloat (ub_exp prec x)}"
+proof -
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "0 < x")
+ case False hence "x \<le> 0" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ from exp_boundaries'[OF this] show ?thesis .
+ next
+ case True hence "-x \<le> 0" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (lb_exp prec x) \<le> exp (Ifloat x)"
+ proof -
+ from exp_boundaries'[OF `-x \<le> 0`]
+ have ub_exp: "exp (- Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_exp prec (-x))" unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff Ifloat_minus by auto
+
+ have "Ifloat (float_divl prec 1 (ub_exp prec (-x))) \<le> Ifloat 1 / Ifloat (ub_exp prec (-x))" using float_divl .
+ also have "Ifloat 1 / Ifloat (ub_exp prec (-x)) \<le> exp (Ifloat x)"
+ using ub_exp[unfolded inverse_le_iff_le[OF order_less_le_trans[OF exp_gt_zero ub_exp] exp_gt_zero, symmetric]]
+ unfolding exp_minus nonzero_inverse_inverse_eq[OF exp_not_eq_zero] inverse_eq_divide by auto
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding lb_exp.simps if_P[OF True] .
+ qed
+ moreover
+ have "exp (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (ub_exp prec x)"
+ proof -
+ have "\<not> 0 < -x" using `0 < x` unfolding less_float_def by auto
+
+ from exp_boundaries'[OF `-x \<le> 0`]
+ have lb_exp: "Ifloat (lb_exp prec (-x)) \<le> exp (- Ifloat x)" unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff Ifloat_minus by auto
+
+ have "exp (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat 1 / Ifloat (lb_exp prec (-x))"
+ using lb_exp[unfolded inverse_le_iff_le[OF exp_gt_zero lb_exp_pos[OF `\<not> 0 < -x`, unfolded less_float_def Ifloat_0], symmetric]]
+ unfolding exp_minus nonzero_inverse_inverse_eq[OF exp_not_eq_zero] inverse_eq_divide Ifloat_1 by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (float_divr prec 1 (lb_exp prec (-x)))" using float_divr .
+ finally show ?thesis unfolding ub_exp.simps if_P[OF True] .
+ qed
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_exp: "\<forall> x lx ux. (l, u) = (lb_exp prec lx, ub_exp prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> exp x \<and> exp x \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof (rule allI, rule allI, rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x lx ux
+ assume "(l, u) = (lb_exp prec lx, ub_exp prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}"
+ hence l: "lb_exp prec lx = l " and u: "ub_exp prec ux = u" and x: "x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}" by auto
+
+ { from exp_boundaries[of lx prec, unfolded l]
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> exp (Ifloat lx)" by (auto simp del: lb_exp.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> exp x" using x by auto
+ finally have "Ifloat l \<le> exp x" .
+ } moreover
+ { have "exp x \<le> exp (Ifloat ux)" using x by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat u" using exp_boundaries[of ux prec, unfolded u] by (auto simp del: ub_exp.simps)
+ finally have "exp x \<le> Ifloat u" .
+ } ultimately show "Ifloat l \<le> exp x \<and> exp x \<le> Ifloat u" ..
+qed
+
+section "Logarithm"
+
+subsection "Compute the logarithm series"
+
+fun ub_ln_horner :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float"
+and lb_ln_horner :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float" where
+"ub_ln_horner prec 0 i x = 0" |
+"ub_ln_horner prec (Suc n) i x = rapprox_rat prec 1 (int i) - x * lb_ln_horner prec n (Suc i) x" |
+"lb_ln_horner prec 0 i x = 0" |
+"lb_ln_horner prec (Suc n) i x = lapprox_rat prec 1 (int i) - x * ub_ln_horner prec n (Suc i) x"
+
+lemma ln_bounds:
+ assumes "0 \<le> x" and "x < 1"
+ shows "(\<Sum>i=0..<2*n. -1^i * (1 / real (i + 1)) * x^(Suc i)) \<le> ln (x + 1)" (is "?lb")
+ and "ln (x + 1) \<le> (\<Sum>i=0..<2*n + 1. -1^i * (1 / real (i + 1)) * x^(Suc i))" (is "?ub")
+proof -
+ let "?a n" = "(1/real (n +1)) * x^(Suc n)"
+
+ have ln_eq: "(\<Sum> i. -1^i * ?a i) = ln (x + 1)"
+ using ln_series[of "x + 1"] `0 \<le> x` `x < 1` by auto
+
+ have "norm x < 1" using assms by auto
+ have "?a ----> 0" unfolding Suc_plus1[symmetric] inverse_eq_divide[symmetric]
+ using LIMSEQ_mult[OF LIMSEQ_inverse_real_of_nat LIMSEQ_Suc[OF LIMSEQ_power_zero[OF `norm x < 1`]]] by auto
+ { fix n have "0 \<le> ?a n" by (rule mult_nonneg_nonneg, auto intro!: mult_nonneg_nonneg simp add: `0 \<le> x`) }
+ { fix n have "?a (Suc n) \<le> ?a n" unfolding inverse_eq_divide[symmetric]
+ proof (rule mult_mono)
+ show "0 \<le> x ^ Suc (Suc n)" by (auto intro!: mult_nonneg_nonneg simp add: `0 \<le> x`)
+ have "x ^ Suc (Suc n) \<le> x ^ Suc n * 1" unfolding power_Suc2 real_mult_assoc[symmetric]
+ by (rule mult_left_mono, fact less_imp_le[OF `x < 1`], auto intro!: mult_nonneg_nonneg simp add: `0 \<le> x`)
+ thus "x ^ Suc (Suc n) \<le> x ^ Suc n" by auto
+ qed auto }
+ from summable_Leibniz'(2,4)[OF `?a ----> 0` `\<And>n. 0 \<le> ?a n`, OF `\<And>n. ?a (Suc n) \<le> ?a n`, unfolded ln_eq]
+ show "?lb" and "?ub" by auto
+qed
+
+lemma ln_float_bounds:
+ assumes "0 \<le> Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x < 1"
+ shows "Ifloat (x * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even n) 1 x) \<le> ln (Ifloat x + 1)" (is "?lb \<le> ?ln")
+ and "ln (Ifloat x + 1) \<le> Ifloat (x * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd n) 1 x)" (is "?ln \<le> ?ub")
+proof -
+ obtain ev where ev: "get_even n = 2 * ev" using get_even_double ..
+ obtain od where od: "get_odd n = 2 * od + 1" using get_odd_double ..
+
+ let "?s n" = "-1^n * (1 / real (1 + n)) * (Ifloat x)^(Suc n)"
+
+ have "?lb \<le> setsum ?s {0 ..< 2 * ev}" unfolding power_Suc2 real_mult_assoc[symmetric] Ifloat_mult setsum_left_distrib[symmetric] unfolding real_mult_commute[of "Ifloat x"] ev
+ using horner_bounds(1)[where G="\<lambda> i k. Suc k" and F="\<lambda>x. x" and f="\<lambda>x. x" and lb="\<lambda>n i k x. lb_ln_horner prec n k x" and ub="\<lambda>n i k x. ub_ln_horner prec n k x" and j'=1 and n="2*ev",
+ OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` refl lb_ln_horner.simps ub_ln_horner.simps] `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ by (rule mult_right_mono)
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> ?ln" using ln_bounds(1)[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x < 1`] by auto
+ finally show "?lb \<le> ?ln" .
+
+ have "?ln \<le> setsum ?s {0 ..< 2 * od + 1}" using ln_bounds(2)[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` `Ifloat x < 1`] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> ?ub" unfolding power_Suc2 real_mult_assoc[symmetric] Ifloat_mult setsum_left_distrib[symmetric] unfolding real_mult_commute[of "Ifloat x"] od
+ using horner_bounds(2)[where G="\<lambda> i k. Suc k" and F="\<lambda>x. x" and f="\<lambda>x. x" and lb="\<lambda>n i k x. lb_ln_horner prec n k x" and ub="\<lambda>n i k x. ub_ln_horner prec n k x" and j'=1 and n="2*od+1",
+ OF `0 \<le> Ifloat x` refl lb_ln_horner.simps ub_ln_horner.simps] `0 \<le> Ifloat x`
+ by (rule mult_right_mono)
+ finally show "?ln \<le> ?ub" .
+qed
+
+lemma ln_add: assumes "0 < x" and "0 < y" shows "ln (x + y) = ln x + ln (1 + y / x)"
+proof -
+ have "x \<noteq> 0" using assms by auto
+ have "x + y = x * (1 + y / x)" unfolding right_distrib times_divide_eq_right nonzero_mult_divide_cancel_left[OF `x \<noteq> 0`] by auto
+ moreover
+ have "0 < y / x" using assms divide_pos_pos by auto
+ hence "0 < 1 + y / x" by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis using ln_mult assms by auto
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute the logarithm of 2"
+
+definition ub_ln2 where "ub_ln2 prec = (let third = rapprox_rat (max prec 1) 1 3
+ in (Float 1 -1 * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd prec) 1 (Float 1 -1)) +
+ (third * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd prec) 1 third))"
+definition lb_ln2 where "lb_ln2 prec = (let third = lapprox_rat prec 1 3
+ in (Float 1 -1 * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even prec) 1 (Float 1 -1)) +
+ (third * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even prec) 1 third))"
+
+lemma ub_ln2: "ln 2 \<le> Ifloat (ub_ln2 prec)" (is "?ub_ln2")
+ and lb_ln2: "Ifloat (lb_ln2 prec) \<le> ln 2" (is "?lb_ln2")
+proof -
+ let ?uthird = "rapprox_rat (max prec 1) 1 3"
+ let ?lthird = "lapprox_rat prec 1 3"
+
+ have ln2_sum: "ln 2 = ln (1/2 + 1) + ln (1 / 3 + 1)"
+ using ln_add[of "3 / 2" "1 / 2"] by auto
+ have lb3: "Ifloat ?lthird \<le> 1 / 3" using lapprox_rat[of prec 1 3] by auto
+ hence lb3_ub: "Ifloat ?lthird < 1" by auto
+ have lb3_lb: "0 \<le> Ifloat ?lthird" using lapprox_rat_bottom[of 1 3] by auto
+ have ub3: "1 / 3 \<le> Ifloat ?uthird" using rapprox_rat[of 1 3] by auto
+ hence ub3_lb: "0 \<le> Ifloat ?uthird" by auto
+
+ have lb2: "0 \<le> Ifloat (Float 1 -1)" and ub2: "Ifloat (Float 1 -1) < 1" unfolding Float_num by auto
+
+ have "0 \<le> (1::int)" and "0 < (3::int)" by auto
+ have ub3_ub: "Ifloat ?uthird < 1" unfolding rapprox_rat.simps(2)[OF `0 \<le> 1` `0 < 3`]
+ by (rule rapprox_posrat_less1, auto)
+
+ have third_gt0: "(0 :: real) < 1 / 3 + 1" by auto
+ have uthird_gt0: "0 < Ifloat ?uthird + 1" using ub3_lb by auto
+ have lthird_gt0: "0 < Ifloat ?lthird + 1" using lb3_lb by auto
+
+ show ?ub_ln2 unfolding ub_ln2_def Let_def Ifloat_add ln2_sum Float_num(4)[symmetric]
+ proof (rule add_mono, fact ln_float_bounds(2)[OF lb2 ub2])
+ have "ln (1 / 3 + 1) \<le> ln (Ifloat ?uthird + 1)" unfolding ln_le_cancel_iff[OF third_gt0 uthird_gt0] using ub3 by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> Ifloat (?uthird * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd prec) 1 ?uthird)"
+ using ln_float_bounds(2)[OF ub3_lb ub3_ub] .
+ finally show "ln (1 / 3 + 1) \<le> Ifloat (?uthird * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd prec) 1 ?uthird)" .
+ qed
+ show ?lb_ln2 unfolding lb_ln2_def Let_def Ifloat_add ln2_sum Float_num(4)[symmetric]
+ proof (rule add_mono, fact ln_float_bounds(1)[OF lb2 ub2])
+ have "Ifloat (?lthird * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even prec) 1 ?lthird) \<le> ln (Ifloat ?lthird + 1)"
+ using ln_float_bounds(1)[OF lb3_lb lb3_ub] .
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> ln (1 / 3 + 1)" unfolding ln_le_cancel_iff[OF lthird_gt0 third_gt0] using lb3 by auto
+ finally show "Ifloat (?lthird * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even prec) 1 ?lthird) \<le> ln (1 / 3 + 1)" .
+ qed
+qed
+
+subsection "Compute the logarithm in the entire domain"
+
+function ub_ln :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float option" and lb_ln :: "nat \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float option" where
+"ub_ln prec x = (if x \<le> 0 then None
+ else if x < 1 then Some (- the (lb_ln prec (float_divl (max prec 1) 1 x)))
+ else let horner = \<lambda>x. (x - 1) * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd prec) 1 (x - 1) in
+ if x < Float 1 1 then Some (horner x)
+ else let l = bitlen (mantissa x) - 1 in
+ Some (ub_ln2 prec * (Float (scale x + l) 0) + horner (Float (mantissa x) (- l))))" |
+"lb_ln prec x = (if x \<le> 0 then None
+ else if x < 1 then Some (- the (ub_ln prec (float_divr prec 1 x)))
+ else let horner = \<lambda>x. (x - 1) * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even prec) 1 (x - 1) in
+ if x < Float 1 1 then Some (horner x)
+ else let l = bitlen (mantissa x) - 1 in
+ Some (lb_ln2 prec * (Float (scale x + l) 0) + horner (Float (mantissa x) (- l))))"
+by pat_completeness auto
+
+termination proof (relation "measure (\<lambda> v. let (prec, x) = sum_case id id v in (if x < 1 then 1 else 0))", auto)
+ fix prec x assume "\<not> x \<le> 0" and "x < 1" and "float_divl (max prec (Suc 0)) 1 x < 1"
+ hence "0 < x" and "0 < max prec (Suc 0)" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ from float_divl_pos_less1_bound[OF `0 < x` `x < 1` `0 < max prec (Suc 0)`]
+ show False using `float_divl (max prec (Suc 0)) 1 x < 1` unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+next
+ fix prec x assume "\<not> x \<le> 0" and "x < 1" and "float_divr prec 1 x < 1"
+ hence "0 < x" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ from float_divr_pos_less1_lower_bound[OF `0 < x` `x < 1`, of prec]
+ show False using `float_divr prec 1 x < 1` unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+qed
+
+lemma ln_shifted_float: assumes "0 < m" shows "ln (Ifloat (Float m e)) = ln 2 * real (e + (bitlen m - 1)) + ln (Ifloat (Float m (- (bitlen m - 1))))"
+proof -
+ let ?B = "2^nat (bitlen m - 1)"
+ have "0 < real m" and "\<And>X. (0 :: real) < 2^X" and "0 < (2 :: real)" and "m \<noteq> 0" using assms by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> bitlen m - 1" using bitlen_ge1[OF `m \<noteq> 0`] by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "0 \<le> e")
+ case True
+ show ?thesis unfolding normalized_float[OF `m \<noteq> 0`]
+ unfolding ln_div[OF `0 < real m` `0 < ?B`] real_of_int_add ln_realpow[OF `0 < 2`]
+ unfolding Ifloat_ge0_exp[OF True] ln_mult[OF `0 < real m` `0 < 2^nat e`]
+ ln_realpow[OF `0 < 2`] algebra_simps using `0 \<le> bitlen m - 1` True by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "0 < -e" by auto
+ hence pow_gt0: "(0::real) < 2^nat (-e)" by auto
+ hence inv_gt0: "(0::real) < inverse (2^nat (-e))" by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding normalized_float[OF `m \<noteq> 0`]
+ unfolding ln_div[OF `0 < real m` `0 < ?B`] real_of_int_add ln_realpow[OF `0 < 2`]
+ unfolding Ifloat_nge0_exp[OF False] ln_mult[OF `0 < real m` inv_gt0] ln_inverse[OF pow_gt0]
+ ln_realpow[OF `0 < 2`] algebra_simps using `0 \<le> bitlen m - 1` False by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds': assumes "1 \<le> x"
+ shows "Ifloat (the (lb_ln prec x)) \<le> ln (Ifloat x) \<and> ln (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_ln prec x))"
+ (is "?lb \<le> ?ln \<and> ?ln \<le> ?ub")
+proof (cases "x < Float 1 1")
+ case True hence "Ifloat (x - 1) < 1" unfolding less_float_def Float_num by auto
+ have "\<not> x \<le> 0" and "\<not> x < 1" using `1 \<le> x` unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ hence "0 \<le> Ifloat (x - 1)" using `1 \<le> x` unfolding less_float_def Float_num by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding lb_ln.simps unfolding ub_ln.simps Let_def
+ using ln_float_bounds[OF `0 \<le> Ifloat (x - 1)` `Ifloat (x - 1) < 1`] `\<not> x \<le> 0` `\<not> x < 1` True by auto
+next
+ case False
+ have "\<not> x \<le> 0" and "\<not> x < 1" "0 < x" using `1 \<le> x` unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases x)
+ case (Float m e)
+ let ?s = "Float (e + (bitlen m - 1)) 0"
+ let ?x = "Float m (- (bitlen m - 1))"
+
+ have "0 < m" and "m \<noteq> 0" using float_pos_m_pos `0 < x` Float by auto
+
+ {
+ have "Ifloat (lb_ln2 prec * ?s) \<le> ln 2 * real (e + (bitlen m - 1))" (is "?lb2 \<le> _")
+ unfolding Ifloat_mult Ifloat_ge0_exp[OF order_refl] nat_0 realpow_0 mult_1_right
+ using lb_ln2[of prec]
+ proof (rule mult_right_mono)
+ have "1 \<le> Float m e" using `1 \<le> x` Float unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ from float_gt1_scale[OF this]
+ show "0 \<le> real (e + (bitlen m - 1))" by auto
+ qed
+ moreover
+ from bitlen_div[OF `0 < m`, unfolded normalized_float[OF `m \<noteq> 0`, symmetric]]
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (?x - 1)" and "Ifloat (?x - 1) < 1" by auto
+ from ln_float_bounds(1)[OF this]
+ have "Ifloat ((?x - 1) * lb_ln_horner prec (get_even prec) 1 (?x - 1)) \<le> ln (Ifloat ?x)" (is "?lb_horner \<le> _") by auto
+ ultimately have "?lb2 + ?lb_horner \<le> ln (Ifloat x)"
+ unfolding Float ln_shifted_float[OF `0 < m`, of e] by auto
+ }
+ moreover
+ {
+ from bitlen_div[OF `0 < m`, unfolded normalized_float[OF `m \<noteq> 0`, symmetric]]
+ have "0 \<le> Ifloat (?x - 1)" and "Ifloat (?x - 1) < 1" by auto
+ from ln_float_bounds(2)[OF this]
+ have "ln (Ifloat ?x) \<le> Ifloat ((?x - 1) * ub_ln_horner prec (get_odd prec) 1 (?x - 1))" (is "_ \<le> ?ub_horner") by auto
+ moreover
+ have "ln 2 * real (e + (bitlen m - 1)) \<le> Ifloat (ub_ln2 prec * ?s)" (is "_ \<le> ?ub2")
+ unfolding Ifloat_mult Ifloat_ge0_exp[OF order_refl] nat_0 realpow_0 mult_1_right
+ using ub_ln2[of prec]
+ proof (rule mult_right_mono)
+ have "1 \<le> Float m e" using `1 \<le> x` Float unfolding le_float_def by auto
+ from float_gt1_scale[OF this]
+ show "0 \<le> real (e + (bitlen m - 1))" by auto
+ qed
+ ultimately have "ln (Ifloat x) \<le> ?ub2 + ?ub_horner"
+ unfolding Float ln_shifted_float[OF `0 < m`, of e] by auto
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thesis unfolding lb_ln.simps unfolding ub_ln.simps
+ unfolding if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> 0`] if_not_P[OF `\<not> x < 1`] if_not_P[OF False] Let_def
+ unfolding scale.simps[of m e, unfolded Float[symmetric]] mantissa.simps[of m e, unfolded Float[symmetric]] Ifloat_add by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds: assumes "0 < x"
+ shows "Ifloat (the (lb_ln prec x)) \<le> ln (Ifloat x) \<and> ln (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_ln prec x))"
+ (is "?lb \<le> ?ln \<and> ?ln \<le> ?ub")
+proof (cases "x < 1")
+ case False hence "1 \<le> x" unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+ show ?thesis using ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds'[OF `1 \<le> x`] .
+next
+ case True have "\<not> x \<le> 0" using `0 < x` unfolding less_float_def le_float_def by auto
+
+ have "0 < Ifloat x" and "Ifloat x \<noteq> 0" using `0 < x` unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ hence A: "0 < 1 / Ifloat x" by auto
+
+ {
+ let ?divl = "float_divl (max prec 1) 1 x"
+ have A': "1 \<le> ?divl" using float_divl_pos_less1_bound[OF `0 < x` `x < 1`] unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+ hence B: "0 < Ifloat ?divl" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+
+ have "ln (Ifloat ?divl) \<le> ln (1 / Ifloat x)" unfolding ln_le_cancel_iff[OF B A] using float_divl[of _ 1 x] by auto
+ hence "ln (Ifloat x) \<le> - ln (Ifloat ?divl)" unfolding nonzero_inverse_eq_divide[OF `Ifloat x \<noteq> 0`, symmetric] ln_inverse[OF `0 < Ifloat x`] by auto
+ from this ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds'[OF A', THEN conjunct1, THEN le_imp_neg_le]
+ have "?ln \<le> Ifloat (- the (lb_ln prec ?divl))" unfolding Ifloat_minus by (rule order_trans)
+ } moreover
+ {
+ let ?divr = "float_divr prec 1 x"
+ have A': "1 \<le> ?divr" using float_divr_pos_less1_lower_bound[OF `0 < x` `x < 1`] unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+ hence B: "0 < Ifloat ?divr" unfolding le_float_def by auto
+
+ have "ln (1 / Ifloat x) \<le> ln (Ifloat ?divr)" unfolding ln_le_cancel_iff[OF A B] using float_divr[of 1 x] by auto
+ hence "- ln (Ifloat ?divr) \<le> ln (Ifloat x)" unfolding nonzero_inverse_eq_divide[OF `Ifloat x \<noteq> 0`, symmetric] ln_inverse[OF `0 < Ifloat x`] by auto
+ from ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds'[OF A', THEN conjunct2, THEN le_imp_neg_le] this
+ have "Ifloat (- the (ub_ln prec ?divr)) \<le> ?ln" unfolding Ifloat_minus by (rule order_trans)
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thesis unfolding lb_ln.simps[where x=x] ub_ln.simps[where x=x]
+ unfolding if_not_P[OF `\<not> x \<le> 0`] if_P[OF True] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lb_ln: assumes "Some y = lb_ln prec x"
+ shows "Ifloat y \<le> ln (Ifloat x)" and "0 < Ifloat x"
+proof -
+ have "0 < x"
+ proof (rule ccontr)
+ assume "\<not> 0 < x" hence "x \<le> 0" unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+ thus False using assms by auto
+ qed
+ thus "0 < Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "Ifloat (the (lb_ln prec x)) \<le> ln (Ifloat x)" using ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds[OF `0 < x`] ..
+ thus "Ifloat y \<le> ln (Ifloat x)" unfolding assms[symmetric] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma ub_ln: assumes "Some y = ub_ln prec x"
+ shows "ln (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat y" and "0 < Ifloat x"
+proof -
+ have "0 < x"
+ proof (rule ccontr)
+ assume "\<not> 0 < x" hence "x \<le> 0" unfolding le_float_def less_float_def by auto
+ thus False using assms by auto
+ qed
+ thus "0 < Ifloat x" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+ have "ln (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat (the (ub_ln prec x))" using ub_ln_lb_ln_bounds[OF `0 < x`] ..
+ thus "ln (Ifloat x) \<le> Ifloat y" unfolding assms[symmetric] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma bnds_ln: "\<forall> x lx ux. (Some l, Some u) = (lb_ln prec lx, ub_ln prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux} \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> ln x \<and> ln x \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof (rule allI, rule allI, rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x lx ux
+ assume "(Some l, Some u) = (lb_ln prec lx, ub_ln prec ux) \<and> x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}"
+ hence l: "Some l = lb_ln prec lx " and u: "Some u = ub_ln prec ux" and x: "x \<in> {Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux}" by auto
+
+ have "ln (Ifloat ux) \<le> Ifloat u" and "0 < Ifloat ux" using ub_ln u by auto
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> ln (Ifloat lx)" and "0 < Ifloat lx" and "0 < x" using lb_ln[OF l] x by auto
+
+ from ln_le_cancel_iff[OF `0 < Ifloat lx` `0 < x`] `Ifloat l \<le> ln (Ifloat lx)`
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> ln x" using x unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff by auto
+ moreover
+ from ln_le_cancel_iff[OF `0 < x` `0 < Ifloat ux`] `ln (Ifloat ux) \<le> Ifloat u`
+ have "ln x \<le> Ifloat u" using x unfolding atLeastAtMost_iff by auto
+ ultimately show "Ifloat l \<le> ln x \<and> ln x \<le> Ifloat u" ..
+qed
+
+
+section "Implement floatarith"
+
+subsection "Define syntax and semantics"
+
+datatype floatarith
+ = Add floatarith floatarith
+ | Minus floatarith
+ | Mult floatarith floatarith
+ | Inverse floatarith
+ | Sin floatarith
+ | Cos floatarith
+ | Arctan floatarith
+ | Abs floatarith
+ | Max floatarith floatarith
+ | Min floatarith floatarith
+ | Pi
+ | Sqrt floatarith
+ | Exp floatarith
+ | Ln floatarith
+ | Power floatarith nat
+ | Atom nat
+ | Num float
+
+fun Ifloatarith :: "floatarith \<Rightarrow> real list \<Rightarrow> real"
+where
+"Ifloatarith (Add a b) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs) + (Ifloatarith b vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Minus a) vs = - (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Mult a b) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs) * (Ifloatarith b vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Inverse a) vs = inverse (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Sin a) vs = sin (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Cos a) vs = cos (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Arctan a) vs = arctan (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Min a b) vs = min (Ifloatarith a vs) (Ifloatarith b vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Max a b) vs = max (Ifloatarith a vs) (Ifloatarith b vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Abs a) vs = abs (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith Pi vs = pi" |
+"Ifloatarith (Sqrt a) vs = sqrt (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Exp a) vs = exp (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Ln a) vs = ln (Ifloatarith a vs)" |
+"Ifloatarith (Power a n) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs)^n" |
+"Ifloatarith (Num f) vs = Ifloat f" |
+"Ifloatarith (Atom n) vs = vs ! n"
+
+subsection "Implement approximation function"
+
+fun lift_bin :: "(float * float) option \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option \<Rightarrow> (float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> (float option * float option)) \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option" where
+"lift_bin (Some (l1, u1)) (Some (l2, u2)) f = (case (f l1 u1 l2 u2) of (Some l, Some u) \<Rightarrow> Some (l, u)
+ | t \<Rightarrow> None)" |
+"lift_bin a b f = None"
+
+fun lift_bin' :: "(float * float) option \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option \<Rightarrow> (float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> (float * float)) \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option" where
+"lift_bin' (Some (l1, u1)) (Some (l2, u2)) f = Some (f l1 u1 l2 u2)" |
+"lift_bin' a b f = None"
+
+fun lift_un :: "(float * float) option \<Rightarrow> (float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> ((float option) * (float option))) \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option" where
+"lift_un (Some (l1, u1)) f = (case (f l1 u1) of (Some l, Some u) \<Rightarrow> Some (l, u)
+ | t \<Rightarrow> None)" |
+"lift_un b f = None"
+
+fun lift_un' :: "(float * float) option \<Rightarrow> (float \<Rightarrow> float \<Rightarrow> (float * float)) \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option" where
+"lift_un' (Some (l1, u1)) f = Some (f l1 u1)" |
+"lift_un' b f = None"
+
+fun bounded_by :: "real list \<Rightarrow> (float * float) list \<Rightarrow> bool " where
+bounded_by_Cons: "bounded_by (v#vs) ((l, u)#bs) = ((Ifloat l \<le> v \<and> v \<le> Ifloat u) \<and> bounded_by vs bs)" |
+bounded_by_Nil: "bounded_by [] [] = True" |
+"bounded_by _ _ = False"
+
+lemma bounded_by: assumes "bounded_by vs bs" and "i < length bs"
+ shows "Ifloat (fst (bs ! i)) \<le> vs ! i \<and> vs ! i \<le> Ifloat (snd (bs ! i))"
+ using `bounded_by vs bs` and `i < length bs`
+proof (induct arbitrary: i rule: bounded_by.induct)
+ fix v :: real and vs :: "real list" and l u :: float and bs :: "(float * float) list" and i :: nat
+ assume hyp: "\<And>i. \<lbrakk>bounded_by vs bs; i < length bs\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat (fst (bs ! i)) \<le> vs ! i \<and> vs ! i \<le> Ifloat (snd (bs ! i))"
+ assume bounded: "bounded_by (v # vs) ((l, u) # bs)" and length: "i < length ((l, u) # bs)"
+ show "Ifloat (fst (((l, u) # bs) ! i)) \<le> (v # vs) ! i \<and> (v # vs) ! i \<le> Ifloat (snd (((l, u) # bs) ! i))"
+ proof (cases i)
+ case 0
+ show ?thesis using bounded unfolding 0 nth_Cons_0 fst_conv snd_conv bounded_by.simps ..
+ next
+ case (Suc i) with length have "i < length bs" by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding Suc nth_Cons_Suc bounded_by.simps
+ using hyp[OF bounded[unfolded bounded_by.simps, THEN conjunct2] `i < length bs`] .
+ qed
+qed auto
+
+fun approx approx' :: "nat \<Rightarrow> floatarith \<Rightarrow> (float * float) list \<Rightarrow> (float * float) option" where
+"approx' prec a bs = (case (approx prec a bs) of Some (l, u) \<Rightarrow> Some (round_down prec l, round_up prec u) | None \<Rightarrow> None)" |
+"approx prec (Add a b) bs = lift_bin' (approx' prec a bs) (approx' prec b bs) (\<lambda> l1 u1 l2 u2. (l1 + l2, u1 + u2))" |
+"approx prec (Minus a) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda> l u. (-u, -l))" |
+"approx prec (Mult a b) bs = lift_bin' (approx' prec a bs) (approx' prec b bs)
+ (\<lambda> a1 a2 b1 b2. (float_nprt a1 * float_pprt b2 + float_nprt a2 * float_nprt b2 + float_pprt a1 * float_pprt b1 + float_pprt a2 * float_nprt b1,
+ float_pprt a2 * float_pprt b2 + float_pprt a1 * float_nprt b2 + float_nprt a2 * float_pprt b1 + float_nprt a1 * float_nprt b1))" |
+"approx prec (Inverse a) bs = lift_un (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda> l u. if (0 < l \<or> u < 0) then (Some (float_divl prec 1 u), Some (float_divr prec 1 l)) else (None, None))" |
+"approx prec (Sin a) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (bnds_sin prec)" |
+"approx prec (Cos a) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (bnds_cos prec)" |
+"approx prec Pi bs = Some (lb_pi prec, ub_pi prec)" |
+"approx prec (Min a b) bs = lift_bin' (approx' prec a bs) (approx' prec b bs) (\<lambda> l1 u1 l2 u2. (min l1 l2, min u1 u2))" |
+"approx prec (Max a b) bs = lift_bin' (approx' prec a bs) (approx' prec b bs) (\<lambda> l1 u1 l2 u2. (max l1 l2, max u1 u2))" |
+"approx prec (Abs a) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda>l u. (if l < 0 \<and> 0 < u then 0 else min \<bar>l\<bar> \<bar>u\<bar>, max \<bar>l\<bar> \<bar>u\<bar>))" |
+"approx prec (Arctan a) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda> l u. (lb_arctan prec l, ub_arctan prec u))" |
+"approx prec (Sqrt a) bs = lift_un (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda> l u. (lb_sqrt prec l, ub_sqrt prec u))" |
+"approx prec (Exp a) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda> l u. (lb_exp prec l, ub_exp prec u))" |
+"approx prec (Ln a) bs = lift_un (approx' prec a bs) (\<lambda> l u. (lb_ln prec l, ub_ln prec u))" |
+"approx prec (Power a n) bs = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) (float_power_bnds n)" |
+"approx prec (Num f) bs = Some (f, f)" |
+"approx prec (Atom i) bs = (if i < length bs then Some (bs ! i) else None)"
+
+lemma lift_bin'_ex:
+ assumes lift_bin'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_bin' a b f"
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1 l2 u2. Some (l1, u1) = a \<and> Some (l2, u2) = b"
+proof (cases a)
+ case None hence "None = lift_bin' a b f" unfolding None lift_bin'.simps ..
+ thus ?thesis using lift_bin'_Some by auto
+next
+ case (Some a')
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases b)
+ case None hence "None = lift_bin' a b f" unfolding None lift_bin'.simps ..
+ thus ?thesis using lift_bin'_Some by auto
+ next
+ case (Some b')
+ obtain la ua where a': "a' = (la, ua)" by (cases a', auto)
+ obtain lb ub where b': "b' = (lb, ub)" by (cases b', auto)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `a = Some a'` `b = Some b'` a' b' by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma lift_bin'_f:
+ assumes lift_bin'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_bin' (g a) (g b) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = g a \<Longrightarrow> P l u a" and Pb: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = g b \<Longrightarrow> P l u b"
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1 l2 u2. P l1 u1 a \<and> P l2 u2 b \<and> l = fst (f l1 u1 l2 u2) \<and> u = snd (f l1 u1 l2 u2)"
+proof -
+ obtain l1 u1 l2 u2
+ where Sa: "Some (l1, u1) = g a" and Sb: "Some (l2, u2) = g b" using lift_bin'_ex[OF assms(1)] by auto
+ have lu: "(l, u) = f l1 u1 l2 u2" using lift_bin'_Some[unfolded Sa[symmetric] Sb[symmetric] lift_bin'.simps] by auto
+ have "l = fst (f l1 u1 l2 u2)" and "u = snd (f l1 u1 l2 u2)" unfolding lu[symmetric] by auto
+ thus ?thesis using Pa[OF Sa] Pb[OF Sb] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma approx_approx':
+ assumes Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec a vs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u"
+ and approx': "Some (l, u) = approx' prec a vs"
+ shows "Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof -
+ obtain l' u' where S: "Some (l', u') = approx prec a vs"
+ using approx' unfolding approx'.simps by (cases "approx prec a vs", auto)
+ have l': "l = round_down prec l'" and u': "u = round_up prec u'"
+ using approx' unfolding approx'.simps S[symmetric] by auto
+ show ?thesis unfolding l' u'
+ using order_trans[OF Pa[OF S, THEN conjunct2] round_up[of u']]
+ using order_trans[OF round_down[of _ l'] Pa[OF S, THEN conjunct1]] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_bin':
+ assumes lift_bin'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_bin' (approx' prec a bs) (approx' prec b bs) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec a bs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u" (is "\<And>l u. _ = ?g a \<Longrightarrow> ?P l u a")
+ and Pb: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec b bs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith b xs \<and> Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u"
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1 l2 u2. (Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1) \<and>
+ (Ifloat l2 \<le> Ifloatarith b xs \<and> Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u2) \<and>
+ l = fst (f l1 u1 l2 u2) \<and> u = snd (f l1 u1 l2 u2)"
+proof -
+ { fix l u assume "Some (l, u) = approx' prec a bs"
+ with approx_approx'[of prec a bs, OF _ this] Pa
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u" by auto } note Pa = this
+ { fix l u assume "Some (l, u) = approx' prec b bs"
+ with approx_approx'[of prec b bs, OF _ this] Pb
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith b xs \<and> Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u" by auto } note Pb = this
+
+ from lift_bin'_f[where g="\<lambda>a. approx' prec a bs" and P = ?P, OF lift_bin'_Some, OF Pa Pb]
+ show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un'_ex:
+ assumes lift_un'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un' a f"
+ shows "\<exists> l u. Some (l, u) = a"
+proof (cases a)
+ case None hence "None = lift_un' a f" unfolding None lift_un'.simps ..
+ thus ?thesis using lift_un'_Some by auto
+next
+ case (Some a')
+ obtain la ua where a': "a' = (la, ua)" by (cases a', auto)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `a = Some a'` a' by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un'_f:
+ assumes lift_un'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un' (g a) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = g a \<Longrightarrow> P l u a"
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1. P l1 u1 a \<and> l = fst (f l1 u1) \<and> u = snd (f l1 u1)"
+proof -
+ obtain l1 u1 where Sa: "Some (l1, u1) = g a" using lift_un'_ex[OF assms(1)] by auto
+ have lu: "(l, u) = f l1 u1" using lift_un'_Some[unfolded Sa[symmetric] lift_un'.simps] by auto
+ have "l = fst (f l1 u1)" and "u = snd (f l1 u1)" unfolding lu[symmetric] by auto
+ thus ?thesis using Pa[OF Sa] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un':
+ assumes lift_un'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec a bs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u" (is "\<And>l u. _ = ?g a \<Longrightarrow> ?P l u a")
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1. (Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1) \<and>
+ l = fst (f l1 u1) \<and> u = snd (f l1 u1)"
+proof -
+ { fix l u assume "Some (l, u) = approx' prec a bs"
+ with approx_approx'[of prec a bs, OF _ this] Pa
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u" by auto } note Pa = this
+ from lift_un'_f[where g="\<lambda>a. approx' prec a bs" and P = ?P, OF lift_un'_Some, OF Pa]
+ show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un'_bnds:
+ assumes bnds: "\<forall> x lx ux. (l, u) = f lx ux \<and> x \<in> { Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux } \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> f' x \<and> f' x \<le> Ifloat u"
+ and lift_un'_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un' (approx' prec a bs) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec a bs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u"
+ shows "Ifloat l \<le> f' (Ifloatarith a xs) \<and> f' (Ifloatarith a xs) \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof -
+ from lift_un'[OF lift_un'_Some Pa]
+ obtain l1 u1 where "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1" and "l = fst (f l1 u1)" and "u = snd (f l1 u1)" by blast
+ hence "(l, u) = f l1 u1" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<in> {Ifloat l1 .. Ifloat u1}" by auto
+ thus ?thesis using bnds by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un_ex:
+ assumes lift_un_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un a f"
+ shows "\<exists> l u. Some (l, u) = a"
+proof (cases a)
+ case None hence "None = lift_un a f" unfolding None lift_un.simps ..
+ thus ?thesis using lift_un_Some by auto
+next
+ case (Some a')
+ obtain la ua where a': "a' = (la, ua)" by (cases a', auto)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding `a = Some a'` a' by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un_f:
+ assumes lift_un_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un (g a) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = g a \<Longrightarrow> P l u a"
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1. P l1 u1 a \<and> Some l = fst (f l1 u1) \<and> Some u = snd (f l1 u1)"
+proof -
+ obtain l1 u1 where Sa: "Some (l1, u1) = g a" using lift_un_ex[OF assms(1)] by auto
+ have "fst (f l1 u1) \<noteq> None \<and> snd (f l1 u1) \<noteq> None"
+ proof (rule ccontr)
+ assume "\<not> (fst (f l1 u1) \<noteq> None \<and> snd (f l1 u1) \<noteq> None)"
+ hence or: "fst (f l1 u1) = None \<or> snd (f l1 u1) = None" by auto
+ hence "lift_un (g a) f = None"
+ proof (cases "fst (f l1 u1) = None")
+ case True
+ then obtain b where b: "f l1 u1 = (None, b)" by (cases "f l1 u1", auto)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding Sa[symmetric] lift_un.simps b by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "snd (f l1 u1) = None" using or by auto
+ with False obtain b where b: "f l1 u1 = (Some b, None)" by (cases "f l1 u1", auto)
+ thus ?thesis unfolding Sa[symmetric] lift_un.simps b by auto
+ qed
+ thus False using lift_un_Some by auto
+ qed
+ then obtain a' b' where f: "f l1 u1 = (Some a', Some b')" by (cases "f l1 u1", auto)
+ from lift_un_Some[unfolded Sa[symmetric] lift_un.simps f]
+ have "Some l = fst (f l1 u1)" and "Some u = snd (f l1 u1)" unfolding f by auto
+ thus ?thesis unfolding Sa[symmetric] lift_un.simps using Pa[OF Sa] by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un:
+ assumes lift_un_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un (approx' prec a bs) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec a bs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u" (is "\<And>l u. _ = ?g a \<Longrightarrow> ?P l u a")
+ shows "\<exists> l1 u1. (Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1) \<and>
+ Some l = fst (f l1 u1) \<and> Some u = snd (f l1 u1)"
+proof -
+ { fix l u assume "Some (l, u) = approx' prec a bs"
+ with approx_approx'[of prec a bs, OF _ this] Pa
+ have "Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u" by auto } note Pa = this
+ from lift_un_f[where g="\<lambda>a. approx' prec a bs" and P = ?P, OF lift_un_Some, OF Pa]
+ show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lift_un_bnds:
+ assumes bnds: "\<forall> x lx ux. (Some l, Some u) = f lx ux \<and> x \<in> { Ifloat lx .. Ifloat ux } \<longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> f' x \<and> f' x \<le> Ifloat u"
+ and lift_un_Some: "Some (l, u) = lift_un (approx' prec a bs) f"
+ and Pa: "\<And>l u. Some (l, u) = approx prec a bs \<Longrightarrow> Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith a xs \<and> Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u"
+ shows "Ifloat l \<le> f' (Ifloatarith a xs) \<and> f' (Ifloatarith a xs) \<le> Ifloat u"
+proof -
+ from lift_un[OF lift_un_Some Pa]
+ obtain l1 u1 where "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1" and "Some l = fst (f l1 u1)" and "Some u = snd (f l1 u1)" by blast
+ hence "(Some l, Some u) = f l1 u1" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<in> {Ifloat l1 .. Ifloat u1}" by auto
+ thus ?thesis using bnds by auto
+qed
+
+lemma approx:
+ assumes "bounded_by xs vs"
+ and "Some (l, u) = approx prec arith vs" (is "_ = ?g arith")
+ shows "Ifloat l \<le> Ifloatarith arith xs \<and> Ifloatarith arith xs \<le> Ifloat u" (is "?P l u arith")
+ using `Some (l, u) = approx prec arith vs`
+proof (induct arith arbitrary: l u x)
+ case (Add a b)
+ from lift_bin'[OF Add.prems[unfolded approx.simps]] Add.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 l2 u2 where "l = l1 + l2" and "u = u1 + u2"
+ "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1"
+ "Ifloat l2 \<le> Ifloatarith b xs" and "Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u2" unfolding fst_conv snd_conv by blast
+ thus ?case unfolding Ifloatarith.simps by auto
+next
+ case (Minus a)
+ from lift_un'[OF Minus.prems[unfolded approx.simps]] Minus.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 where "l = -u1" and "u = -l1"
+ "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1" unfolding fst_conv snd_conv by blast
+ thus ?case unfolding Ifloatarith.simps using Ifloat_minus by auto
+next
+ case (Mult a b)
+ from lift_bin'[OF Mult.prems[unfolded approx.simps]] Mult.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 l2 u2
+ where l: "l = float_nprt l1 * float_pprt u2 + float_nprt u1 * float_nprt u2 + float_pprt l1 * float_pprt l2 + float_pprt u1 * float_nprt l2"
+ and u: "u = float_pprt u1 * float_pprt u2 + float_pprt l1 * float_nprt u2 + float_nprt u1 * float_pprt l2 + float_nprt l1 * float_nprt l2"
+ and "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1"
+ and "Ifloat l2 \<le> Ifloatarith b xs" and "Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u2" unfolding fst_conv snd_conv by blast
+ thus ?case unfolding Ifloatarith.simps l u Ifloat_add Ifloat_mult Ifloat_nprt Ifloat_pprt
+ using mult_le_prts mult_ge_prts by auto
+next
+ case (Inverse a)
+ from lift_un[OF Inverse.prems[unfolded approx.simps], unfolded if_distrib[of fst] if_distrib[of snd] fst_conv snd_conv] Inverse.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 where l': "Some l = (if 0 < l1 \<or> u1 < 0 then Some (float_divl prec 1 u1) else None)"
+ and u': "Some u = (if 0 < l1 \<or> u1 < 0 then Some (float_divr prec 1 l1) else None)"
+ and l1: "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and u1: "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1" by blast
+ have either: "0 < l1 \<or> u1 < 0" proof (rule ccontr) assume P: "\<not> (0 < l1 \<or> u1 < 0)" show False using l' unfolding if_not_P[OF P] by auto qed
+ moreover have l1_le_u1: "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloat u1" using l1 u1 by auto
+ ultimately have "Ifloat l1 \<noteq> 0" and "Ifloat u1 \<noteq> 0" unfolding less_float_def by auto
+
+ have inv: "inverse (Ifloat u1) \<le> inverse (Ifloatarith a xs)
+ \<and> inverse (Ifloatarith a xs) \<le> inverse (Ifloat l1)"
+ proof (cases "0 < l1")
+ case True hence "0 < Ifloat u1" and "0 < Ifloat l1" "0 < Ifloatarith a xs"
+ unfolding less_float_def using l1_le_u1 l1 by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ unfolding inverse_le_iff_le[OF `0 < Ifloat u1` `0 < Ifloatarith a xs`]
+ inverse_le_iff_le[OF `0 < Ifloatarith a xs` `0 < Ifloat l1`]
+ using l1 u1 by auto
+ next
+ case False hence "u1 < 0" using either by blast
+ hence "Ifloat u1 < 0" and "Ifloat l1 < 0" "Ifloatarith a xs < 0"
+ unfolding less_float_def using l1_le_u1 u1 by auto
+ show ?thesis
+ unfolding inverse_le_iff_le_neg[OF `Ifloat u1 < 0` `Ifloatarith a xs < 0`]
+ inverse_le_iff_le_neg[OF `Ifloatarith a xs < 0` `Ifloat l1 < 0`]
+ using l1 u1 by auto
+ qed
+
+ from l' have "l = float_divl prec 1 u1" by (cases "0 < l1 \<or> u1 < 0", auto)
+ hence "Ifloat l \<le> inverse (Ifloat u1)" unfolding nonzero_inverse_eq_divide[OF `Ifloat u1 \<noteq> 0`] using float_divl[of prec 1 u1] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> \<le> inverse (Ifloatarith a xs)" using inv by auto
+ finally have "Ifloat l \<le> inverse (Ifloatarith a xs)" .
+ moreover
+ from u' have "u = float_divr prec 1 l1" by (cases "0 < l1 \<or> u1 < 0", auto)
+ hence "inverse (Ifloat l1) \<le> Ifloat u" unfolding nonzero_inverse_eq_divide[OF `Ifloat l1 \<noteq> 0`] using float_divr[of 1 l1 prec] by auto
+ hence "inverse (Ifloatarith a xs) \<le> Ifloat u" by (rule order_trans[OF inv[THEN conjunct2]])
+ ultimately show ?case unfolding Ifloatarith.simps using l1 u1 by auto
+next
+ case (Abs x)
+ from lift_un'[OF Abs.prems[unfolded approx.simps], unfolded fst_conv snd_conv] Abs.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 where l': "l = (if l1 < 0 \<and> 0 < u1 then 0 else min \<bar>l1\<bar> \<bar>u1\<bar>)" and u': "u = max \<bar>l1\<bar> \<bar>u1\<bar>"
+ and l1: "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith x xs" and u1: "Ifloatarith x xs \<le> Ifloat u1" by blast
+ thus ?case unfolding l' u' by (cases "l1 < 0 \<and> 0 < u1", auto simp add: Ifloat_min Ifloat_max Ifloat_abs less_float_def)
+next
+ case (Min a b)
+ from lift_bin'[OF Min.prems[unfolded approx.simps], unfolded fst_conv snd_conv] Min.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 l2 u2 where l': "l = min l1 l2" and u': "u = min u1 u2"
+ and l1: "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and u1: "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1"
+ and l1: "Ifloat l2 \<le> Ifloatarith b xs" and u1: "Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u2" by blast
+ thus ?case unfolding l' u' by (auto simp add: Ifloat_min)
+next
+ case (Max a b)
+ from lift_bin'[OF Max.prems[unfolded approx.simps], unfolded fst_conv snd_conv] Max.hyps
+ obtain l1 u1 l2 u2 where l': "l = max l1 l2" and u': "u = max u1 u2"
+ and l1: "Ifloat l1 \<le> Ifloatarith a xs" and u1: "Ifloatarith a xs \<le> Ifloat u1"
+ and l1: "Ifloat l2 \<le> Ifloatarith b xs" and u1: "Ifloatarith b xs \<le> Ifloat u2" by blast
+ thus ?case unfolding l' u' by (auto simp add: Ifloat_max)
+next case (Sin a) with lift_un'_bnds[OF bnds_sin] show ?case by auto
+next case (Cos a) with lift_un'_bnds[OF bnds_cos] show ?case by auto
+next case (Arctan a) with lift_un'_bnds[OF bnds_arctan] show ?case by auto
+next case Pi with pi_boundaries show ?case by auto
+next case (Sqrt a) with lift_un_bnds[OF bnds_sqrt] show ?case by auto
+next case (Exp a) with lift_un'_bnds[OF bnds_exp] show ?case by auto
+next case (Ln a) with lift_un_bnds[OF bnds_ln] show ?case by auto
+next case (Power a n) with lift_un'_bnds[OF bnds_power] show ?case by auto
+next case (Num f) thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (Atom n)
+ show ?case
+ proof (cases "n < length vs")
+ case True
+ with Atom have "vs ! n = (l, u)" by auto
+ thus ?thesis using bounded_by[OF assms(1) True] by auto
+ next
+ case False thus ?thesis using Atom by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+datatype ApproxEq = Less floatarith floatarith
+ | LessEqual floatarith floatarith
+
+fun uneq :: "ApproxEq \<Rightarrow> real list \<Rightarrow> bool" where
+"uneq (Less a b) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs < Ifloatarith b vs)" |
+"uneq (LessEqual a b) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs \<le> Ifloatarith b vs)"
+
+fun uneq' :: "nat \<Rightarrow> ApproxEq \<Rightarrow> (float * float) list \<Rightarrow> bool" where
+"uneq' prec (Less a b) bs = (case (approx prec a bs, approx prec b bs) of (Some (l, u), Some (l', u')) \<Rightarrow> u < l' | _ \<Rightarrow> False)" |
+"uneq' prec (LessEqual a b) bs = (case (approx prec a bs, approx prec b bs) of (Some (l, u), Some (l', u')) \<Rightarrow> u \<le> l' | _ \<Rightarrow> False)"
+
+lemma uneq_approx: fixes m :: nat assumes "bounded_by vs bs" and "uneq' prec eq bs"
+ shows "uneq eq vs"
+proof (cases eq)
+ case (Less a b)
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "\<exists> u l u' l'. approx prec a bs = Some (l, u) \<and>
+ approx prec b bs = Some (l', u')")
+ case True
+ then obtain l u l' u' where a_approx: "approx prec a bs = Some (l, u)"
+ and b_approx: "approx prec b bs = Some (l', u') " by auto
+ with `uneq' prec eq bs` have "Ifloat u < Ifloat l'"
+ unfolding Less uneq'.simps less_float_def by auto
+ moreover from a_approx[symmetric] and b_approx[symmetric] and `bounded_by vs bs`
+ have "Ifloatarith a vs \<le> Ifloat u" and "Ifloat l' \<le> Ifloatarith b vs"
+ using approx by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis unfolding uneq.simps Less by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "approx prec a bs = None \<or> approx prec b bs = None"
+ unfolding not_Some_eq[symmetric] by auto
+ hence "\<not> uneq' prec eq bs" unfolding Less uneq'.simps
+ by (cases "approx prec a bs = None", auto)
+ thus ?thesis using assms by auto
+ qed
+next
+ case (LessEqual a b)
+ show ?thesis
+ proof (cases "\<exists> u l u' l'. approx prec a bs = Some (l, u) \<and>
+ approx prec b bs = Some (l', u')")
+ case True
+ then obtain l u l' u' where a_approx: "approx prec a bs = Some (l, u)"
+ and b_approx: "approx prec b bs = Some (l', u') " by auto
+ with `uneq' prec eq bs` have "Ifloat u \<le> Ifloat l'"
+ unfolding LessEqual uneq'.simps le_float_def by auto
+ moreover from a_approx[symmetric] and b_approx[symmetric] and `bounded_by vs bs`
+ have "Ifloatarith a vs \<le> Ifloat u" and "Ifloat l' \<le> Ifloatarith b vs"
+ using approx by auto
+ ultimately show ?thesis unfolding uneq.simps LessEqual by auto
+ next
+ case False
+ hence "approx prec a bs = None \<or> approx prec b bs = None"
+ unfolding not_Some_eq[symmetric] by auto
+ hence "\<not> uneq' prec eq bs" unfolding LessEqual uneq'.simps
+ by (cases "approx prec a bs = None", auto)
+ thus ?thesis using assms by auto
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma Ifloatarith_divide: "Ifloatarith (Mult a (Inverse b)) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs) / (Ifloatarith b vs)"
+ unfolding real_divide_def Ifloatarith.simps ..
+
+lemma Ifloatarith_diff: "Ifloatarith (Add a (Minus b)) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs) - (Ifloatarith b vs)"
+ unfolding real_diff_def Ifloatarith.simps ..
+
+lemma Ifloatarith_tan: "Ifloatarith (Mult (Sin a) (Inverse (Cos a))) vs = tan (Ifloatarith a vs)"
+ unfolding tan_def Ifloatarith.simps real_divide_def ..
+
+lemma Ifloatarith_powr: "Ifloatarith (Exp (Mult b (Ln a))) vs = (Ifloatarith a vs) powr (Ifloatarith b vs)"
+ unfolding powr_def Ifloatarith.simps ..
+
+lemma Ifloatarith_log: "Ifloatarith ((Mult (Ln x) (Inverse (Ln b)))) vs = log (Ifloatarith b vs) (Ifloatarith x vs)"
+ unfolding log_def Ifloatarith.simps real_divide_def ..
+
+lemma Ifloatarith_num: shows "Ifloatarith (Num (Float 0 0)) vs = 0" and "Ifloatarith (Num (Float 1 0)) vs = 1" and "Ifloatarith (Num (Float (number_of a) 0)) vs = number_of a" by auto
+
+subsection {* Implement proof method \texttt{approximation} *}
+
+lemma bounded_divl: assumes "Ifloat a / Ifloat b \<le> x" shows "Ifloat (float_divl p a b) \<le> x" by (rule order_trans[OF _ assms], rule float_divl)
+lemma bounded_divr: assumes "x \<le> Ifloat a / Ifloat b" shows "x \<le> Ifloat (float_divr p a b)" by (rule order_trans[OF assms _], rule float_divr)
+lemma bounded_num: shows "Ifloat (Float 5 1) = 10" and "Ifloat (Float 0 0) = 0" and "Ifloat (Float 1 0) = 1" and "Ifloat (Float (number_of n) 0) = (number_of n)"
+ and "0 * pow2 e = Ifloat (Float 0 e)" and "1 * pow2 e = Ifloat (Float 1 e)" and "number_of m * pow2 e = Ifloat (Float (number_of m) e)"
+ by (auto simp add: Ifloat.simps pow2_def)
+
+lemmas bounded_by_equations = bounded_by_Cons bounded_by_Nil float_power bounded_divl bounded_divr bounded_num HOL.simp_thms
+lemmas uneq_equations = uneq.simps Ifloatarith.simps Ifloatarith_num Ifloatarith_divide Ifloatarith_diff Ifloatarith_tan Ifloatarith_powr Ifloatarith_log
+
+lemma "x div (0::int) = 0" by auto -- "What happens in the zero case for div"
+lemma "x mod (0::int) = x" by auto -- "What happens in the zero case for mod"
+
+text {* The following equations must hold for div & mod
+ -- see "The Definition of Standard ML" by R. Milner, M. Tofte and R. Harper (pg. 79) *}
+lemma "d * (i div d) + i mod d = (i::int)" by auto
+lemma "0 < (d :: int) \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> i mod d \<and> i mod d < d" by auto
+lemma "(d :: int) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> d < i mod d \<and> i mod d \<le> 0" by auto
+
+code_const "op div :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int" (SML "(fn i => fn d => if d = 0 then 0 else i div d)")
+code_const "op mod :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int" (SML "(fn i => fn d => if d = 0 then i else i mod d)")
+code_const "divmod :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> (int * int)" (SML "(fn i => fn d => if d = 0 then (0, i) else IntInf.divMod (i, d))")
+
+ML {*
+ val uneq_equations = PureThy.get_thms @{theory} "uneq_equations";
+ val bounded_by_equations = PureThy.get_thms @{theory} "bounded_by_equations";
+ val bounded_by_simpset = (HOL_basic_ss addsimps bounded_by_equations)
+
+ fun reify_uneq ctxt i = (fn st =>
+ let
+ val to = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (List.nth (prems_of st, i - 1)))
+ in (Reflection.genreify_tac ctxt uneq_equations (SOME to) i) st
+ end)
+
+ fun rule_uneq ctxt prec i thm = let
+ fun conv_num typ = HOLogic.dest_number #> snd #> HOLogic.mk_number typ
+ val to_natc = conv_num @{typ "nat"} #> Thm.cterm_of (ProofContext.theory_of ctxt)
+ val to_nat = conv_num @{typ "nat"}
+ val to_int = conv_num @{typ "int"}
+
+ val prec' = to_nat prec
+
+ fun bot_float (Const (@{const_name "times"}, _) $ mantisse $ (Const (@{const_name "pow2"}, _) $ exp))
+ = @{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ to_int exp
+ | bot_float (Const (@{const_name "divide"}, _) $ mantisse $ (Const (@{const_name "power"}, _) $ ten $ exp))
+ = @{term "float_divl"} $ prec' $ (@{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ @{term "0 :: int"}) $ (@{term "power_float (Float 5 1)"} $ to_nat exp)
+ | bot_float (Const (@{const_name "divide"}, _) $ mantisse $ ten)
+ = @{term "float_divl"} $ prec' $ (@{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ @{term "0 :: int"}) $ @{term "Float 5 1"}
+ | bot_float mantisse = @{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ @{term "0 :: int"}
+
+ fun top_float (Const (@{const_name "times"}, _) $ mantisse $ (Const (@{const_name "pow2"}, _) $ exp))
+ = @{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ to_int exp
+ | top_float (Const (@{const_name "divide"}, _) $ mantisse $ (Const (@{const_name "power"}, _) $ ten $ exp))
+ = @{term "float_divr"} $ prec' $ (@{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ @{term "0 :: int"}) $ (@{term "power_float (Float 5 1)"} $ to_nat exp)
+ | top_float (Const (@{const_name "divide"}, _) $ mantisse $ ten)
+ = @{term "float_divr"} $ prec' $ (@{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ @{term "0 :: int"}) $ @{term "Float 5 1"}
+ | top_float mantisse = @{term "Float"} $ to_int mantisse $ @{term "0 :: int"}
+
+ val goal' : term = List.nth (prems_of thm, i - 1)
+
+ fun lift_bnd (t as (Const (@{const_name "op &"}, _) $
+ (Const (@{const_name "less_eq"}, _) $
+ bottom $ (Free (name, _))) $
+ (Const (@{const_name "less_eq"}, _) $ _ $ top)))
+ = ((name, HOLogic.mk_prod (bot_float bottom, top_float top))
+ handle TERM (txt, ts) => raise TERM ("Premisse needs format '<num> <= <var> & <var> <= <num>', but found " ^
+ (Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t), [t]))
+ | lift_bnd t = raise TERM ("Premisse needs format '<num> <= <var> & <var> <= <num>', but found " ^
+ (Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t), [t])
+ val bound_eqs = map (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> lift_bnd) (Logic.strip_imp_prems goal')
+
+ fun lift_var (Free (varname, _)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) bound_eqs varname of
+ SOME bound => bound
+ | NONE => raise TERM ("No bound equations found for " ^ varname, []))
+ | lift_var t = raise TERM ("Can not convert expression " ^
+ (Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t), [t])
+
+ val _ $ vs = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl goal')
+
+ val bs = (HOLogic.dest_list #> map lift_var #> HOLogic.mk_list @{typ "float * float"}) vs
+ val map = [(@{cpat "?prec::nat"}, to_natc prec),
+ (@{cpat "?bs::(float * float) list"}, Thm.cterm_of (ProofContext.theory_of ctxt) bs)]
+ in rtac (Thm.instantiate ([], map) @{thm "uneq_approx"}) i thm end
+
+ val eval_tac = CSUBGOAL (fn (ct, i) => rtac (eval_oracle ct) i)
+
+ fun gen_eval_tac conv ctxt = CONVERSION (Conv.params_conv (~1) (K (Conv.concl_conv (~1) conv)) ctxt)
+ THEN' rtac TrueI
+
+*}
+
+method_setup approximation = {* fn src =>
+ Method.syntax Args.term src #>
+ (fn (prec, ctxt) => let
+ in Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' (fn i =>
+ (DETERM (reify_uneq ctxt i)
+ THEN rule_uneq ctxt prec i
+ THEN Simplifier.asm_full_simp_tac bounded_by_simpset i
+ THEN (TRY (filter_prems_tac (fn t => false) i))
+ THEN (gen_eval_tac eval_oracle ctxt) i))
+ end)
+*} "real number approximation"
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Cooper.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2174 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/Cooper.thy
+ Author: Amine Chaieb
+*)
+
+theory Cooper
+imports Complex_Main Efficient_Nat
+uses ("cooper_tac.ML")
+begin
+
+function iupt :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int list" where
+ "iupt i j = (if j < i then [] else i # iupt (i+1) j)"
+by pat_completeness auto
+termination by (relation "measure (\<lambda> (i, j). nat (j-i+1))") auto
+
+lemma iupt_set: "set (iupt i j) = {i..j}"
+ by (induct rule: iupt.induct) (simp add: simp_from_to)
+
+(* Periodicity of dvd *)
+
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+ (**** SHADOW SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS ****)
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+
+datatype num = C int | Bound nat | CN nat int num | Neg num | Add num num| Sub num num
+ | Mul int num
+
+ (* A size for num to make inductive proofs simpler*)
+primrec num_size :: "num \<Rightarrow> nat" where
+ "num_size (C c) = 1"
+| "num_size (Bound n) = 1"
+| "num_size (Neg a) = 1 + num_size a"
+| "num_size (Add a b) = 1 + num_size a + num_size b"
+| "num_size (Sub a b) = 3 + num_size a + num_size b"
+| "num_size (CN n c a) = 4 + num_size a"
+| "num_size (Mul c a) = 1 + num_size a"
+
+primrec Inum :: "int list \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> int" where
+ "Inum bs (C c) = c"
+| "Inum bs (Bound n) = bs!n"
+| "Inum bs (CN n c a) = c * (bs!n) + (Inum bs a)"
+| "Inum bs (Neg a) = -(Inum bs a)"
+| "Inum bs (Add a b) = Inum bs a + Inum bs b"
+| "Inum bs (Sub a b) = Inum bs a - Inum bs b"
+| "Inum bs (Mul c a) = c* Inum bs a"
+
+datatype fm =
+ T| F| Lt num| Le num| Gt num| Ge num| Eq num| NEq num| Dvd int num| NDvd int num|
+ NOT fm| And fm fm| Or fm fm| Imp fm fm| Iff fm fm| E fm| A fm
+ | Closed nat | NClosed nat
+
+
+ (* A size for fm *)
+consts fmsize :: "fm \<Rightarrow> nat"
+recdef fmsize "measure size"
+ "fmsize (NOT p) = 1 + fmsize p"
+ "fmsize (And p q) = 1 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+ "fmsize (Or p q) = 1 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+ "fmsize (Imp p q) = 3 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+ "fmsize (Iff p q) = 3 + 2*(fmsize p + fmsize q)"
+ "fmsize (E p) = 1 + fmsize p"
+ "fmsize (A p) = 4+ fmsize p"
+ "fmsize (Dvd i t) = 2"
+ "fmsize (NDvd i t) = 2"
+ "fmsize p = 1"
+ (* several lemmas about fmsize *)
+lemma fmsize_pos: "fmsize p > 0"
+by (induct p rule: fmsize.induct) simp_all
+
+ (* Semantics of formulae (fm) *)
+consts Ifm ::"bool list \<Rightarrow> int list \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> bool"
+primrec
+ "Ifm bbs bs T = True"
+ "Ifm bbs bs F = False"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Lt a) = (Inum bs a < 0)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Gt a) = (Inum bs a > 0)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Le a) = (Inum bs a \<le> 0)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Ge a) = (Inum bs a \<ge> 0)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Eq a) = (Inum bs a = 0)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (NEq a) = (Inum bs a \<noteq> 0)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Dvd i b) = (i dvd Inum bs b)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (NDvd i b) = (\<not>(i dvd Inum bs b))"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (NOT p) = (\<not> (Ifm bbs bs p))"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (And p q) = (Ifm bbs bs p \<and> Ifm bbs bs q)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Or p q) = (Ifm bbs bs p \<or> Ifm bbs bs q)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Imp p q) = ((Ifm bbs bs p) \<longrightarrow> (Ifm bbs bs q))"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Iff p q) = (Ifm bbs bs p = Ifm bbs bs q)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (E p) = (\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (A p) = (\<forall> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (Closed n) = bbs!n"
+ "Ifm bbs bs (NClosed n) = (\<not> bbs!n)"
+
+consts prep :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef prep "measure fmsize"
+ "prep (E T) = T"
+ "prep (E F) = F"
+ "prep (E (Or p q)) = Or (prep (E p)) (prep (E q))"
+ "prep (E (Imp p q)) = Or (prep (E (NOT p))) (prep (E q))"
+ "prep (E (Iff p q)) = Or (prep (E (And p q))) (prep (E (And (NOT p) (NOT q))))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (And p q))) = Or (prep (E (NOT p))) (prep (E(NOT q)))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (Imp p q))) = prep (E (And p (NOT q)))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (Iff p q))) = Or (prep (E (And p (NOT q)))) (prep (E(And (NOT p) q)))"
+ "prep (E p) = E (prep p)"
+ "prep (A (And p q)) = And (prep (A p)) (prep (A q))"
+ "prep (A p) = prep (NOT (E (NOT p)))"
+ "prep (NOT (NOT p)) = prep p"
+ "prep (NOT (And p q)) = Or (prep (NOT p)) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (A p)) = prep (E (NOT p))"
+ "prep (NOT (Or p q)) = And (prep (NOT p)) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (Imp p q)) = And (prep p) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (Iff p q)) = Or (prep (And p (NOT q))) (prep (And (NOT p) q))"
+ "prep (NOT p) = NOT (prep p)"
+ "prep (Or p q) = Or (prep p) (prep q)"
+ "prep (And p q) = And (prep p) (prep q)"
+ "prep (Imp p q) = prep (Or (NOT p) q)"
+ "prep (Iff p q) = Or (prep (And p q)) (prep (And (NOT p) (NOT q)))"
+ "prep p = p"
+(hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+lemma prep: "Ifm bbs bs (prep p) = Ifm bbs bs p"
+by (induct p arbitrary: bs rule: prep.induct, auto)
+
+
+ (* Quantifier freeness *)
+consts qfree:: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef qfree "measure size"
+ "qfree (E p) = False"
+ "qfree (A p) = False"
+ "qfree (NOT p) = qfree p"
+ "qfree (And p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree (Or p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree (Imp p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree (Iff p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree p = True"
+
+ (* Boundedness and substitution *)
+consts
+ numbound0:: "num \<Rightarrow> bool" (* a num is INDEPENDENT of Bound 0 *)
+ bound0:: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* A Formula is independent of Bound 0 *)
+ subst0:: "num \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* substitue a num into a formula for Bound 0 *)
+primrec
+ "numbound0 (C c) = True"
+ "numbound0 (Bound n) = (n>0)"
+ "numbound0 (CN n i a) = (n >0 \<and> numbound0 a)"
+ "numbound0 (Neg a) = numbound0 a"
+ "numbound0 (Add a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+ "numbound0 (Sub a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+ "numbound0 (Mul i a) = numbound0 a"
+
+lemma numbound0_I:
+ assumes nb: "numbound0 a"
+ shows "Inum (b#bs) a = Inum (b'#bs) a"
+using nb
+by (induct a rule: numbound0.induct) (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc)
+
+primrec
+ "bound0 T = True"
+ "bound0 F = True"
+ "bound0 (Lt a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Le a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Gt a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Ge a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Eq a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (NEq a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Dvd i a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (NDvd i a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (NOT p) = bound0 p"
+ "bound0 (And p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ "bound0 (Or p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ "bound0 (Imp p q) = ((bound0 p) \<and> (bound0 q))"
+ "bound0 (Iff p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ "bound0 (E p) = False"
+ "bound0 (A p) = False"
+ "bound0 (Closed P) = True"
+ "bound0 (NClosed P) = True"
+lemma bound0_I:
+ assumes bp: "bound0 p"
+ shows "Ifm bbs (b#bs) p = Ifm bbs (b'#bs) p"
+using bp numbound0_I[where b="b" and bs="bs" and b'="b'"]
+by (induct p rule: bound0.induct) (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc)
+
+fun numsubst0:: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num" where
+ "numsubst0 t (C c) = (C c)"
+| "numsubst0 t (Bound n) = (if n=0 then t else Bound n)"
+| "numsubst0 t (CN 0 i a) = Add (Mul i t) (numsubst0 t a)"
+| "numsubst0 t (CN n i a) = CN n i (numsubst0 t a)"
+| "numsubst0 t (Neg a) = Neg (numsubst0 t a)"
+| "numsubst0 t (Add a b) = Add (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
+| "numsubst0 t (Sub a b) = Sub (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
+| "numsubst0 t (Mul i a) = Mul i (numsubst0 t a)"
+
+lemma numsubst0_I:
+ "Inum (b#bs) (numsubst0 a t) = Inum ((Inum (b#bs) a)#bs) t"
+by (induct t rule: numsubst0.induct,auto simp:nth_Cons')
+
+lemma numsubst0_I':
+ "numbound0 a \<Longrightarrow> Inum (b#bs) (numsubst0 a t) = Inum ((Inum (b'#bs) a)#bs) t"
+by (induct t rule: numsubst0.induct, auto simp: nth_Cons' numbound0_I[where b="b" and b'="b'"])
+
+primrec
+ "subst0 t T = T"
+ "subst0 t F = F"
+ "subst0 t (Lt a) = Lt (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (Le a) = Le (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (Gt a) = Gt (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (Ge a) = Ge (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (Eq a) = Eq (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (NEq a) = NEq (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (numsubst0 t a)"
+ "subst0 t (NOT p) = NOT (subst0 t p)"
+ "subst0 t (And p q) = And (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ "subst0 t (Or p q) = Or (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ "subst0 t (Imp p q) = Imp (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ "subst0 t (Iff p q) = Iff (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ "subst0 t (Closed P) = (Closed P)"
+ "subst0 t (NClosed P) = (NClosed P)"
+
+lemma subst0_I: assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "Ifm bbs (b#bs) (subst0 a p) = Ifm bbs ((Inum (b#bs) a)#bs) p"
+ using qfp numsubst0_I[where b="b" and bs="bs" and a="a"]
+ by (induct p) (simp_all add: gr0_conv_Suc)
+
+
+consts
+ decrnum:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ decr :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+
+recdef decrnum "measure size"
+ "decrnum (Bound n) = Bound (n - 1)"
+ "decrnum (Neg a) = Neg (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (Add a b) = Add (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum (Sub a b) = Sub (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum (Mul c a) = Mul c (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (CN n i a) = (CN (n - 1) i (decrnum a))"
+ "decrnum a = a"
+
+recdef decr "measure size"
+ "decr (Lt a) = Lt (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Le a) = Le (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Gt a) = Gt (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Ge a) = Ge (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Eq a) = Eq (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NEq a) = NEq (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NOT p) = NOT (decr p)"
+ "decr (And p q) = And (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Or p q) = Or (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Imp p q) = Imp (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Iff p q) = Iff (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr p = p"
+
+lemma decrnum: assumes nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "Inum (x#bs) t = Inum bs (decrnum t)"
+ using nb by (induct t rule: decrnum.induct, auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc)
+
+lemma decr: assumes nb: "bound0 p"
+ shows "Ifm bbs (x#bs) p = Ifm bbs bs (decr p)"
+ using nb
+ by (induct p rule: decr.induct, simp_all add: gr0_conv_Suc decrnum)
+
+lemma decr_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (decr p)"
+by (induct p, simp_all)
+
+consts
+ isatom :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* test for atomicity *)
+recdef isatom "measure size"
+ "isatom T = True"
+ "isatom F = True"
+ "isatom (Lt a) = True"
+ "isatom (Le a) = True"
+ "isatom (Gt a) = True"
+ "isatom (Ge a) = True"
+ "isatom (Eq a) = True"
+ "isatom (NEq a) = True"
+ "isatom (Dvd i b) = True"
+ "isatom (NDvd i b) = True"
+ "isatom (Closed P) = True"
+ "isatom (NClosed P) = True"
+ "isatom p = False"
+
+lemma numsubst0_numbound0: assumes nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "numbound0 (numsubst0 t a)"
+using nb apply (induct a rule: numbound0.induct)
+apply simp_all
+apply (case_tac n, simp_all)
+done
+
+lemma subst0_bound0: assumes qf: "qfree p" and nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "bound0 (subst0 t p)"
+using qf numsubst0_numbound0[OF nb] by (induct p rule: subst0.induct, auto)
+
+lemma bound0_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
+by (induct p, simp_all)
+
+
+constdefs djf:: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "djf f p q \<equiv> (if q=T then T else if q=F then f p else
+ (let fp = f p in case fp of T \<Rightarrow> T | F \<Rightarrow> q | _ \<Rightarrow> Or (f p) q))"
+constdefs evaldjf:: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "evaldjf f ps \<equiv> foldr (djf f) ps F"
+
+lemma djf_Or: "Ifm bbs bs (djf f p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Or (f p) q)"
+by (cases "q=T", simp add: djf_def,cases "q=F",simp add: djf_def)
+(cases "f p", simp_all add: Let_def djf_def)
+
+lemma evaldjf_ex: "Ifm bbs bs (evaldjf f ps) = (\<exists> p \<in> set ps. Ifm bbs bs (f p))"
+ by(induct ps, simp_all add: evaldjf_def djf_Or)
+
+lemma evaldjf_bound0:
+ assumes nb: "\<forall> x\<in> set xs. bound0 (f x)"
+ shows "bound0 (evaldjf f xs)"
+ using nb by (induct xs, auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def) (case_tac "f a", auto)
+
+lemma evaldjf_qf:
+ assumes nb: "\<forall> x\<in> set xs. qfree (f x)"
+ shows "qfree (evaldjf f xs)"
+ using nb by (induct xs, auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def) (case_tac "f a", auto)
+
+consts disjuncts :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm list"
+recdef disjuncts "measure size"
+ "disjuncts (Or p q) = (disjuncts p) @ (disjuncts q)"
+ "disjuncts F = []"
+ "disjuncts p = [p]"
+
+lemma disjuncts: "(\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs q) = Ifm bbs bs p"
+by(induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+
+lemma disjuncts_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). bound0 q"
+proof-
+ assume nb: "bound0 p"
+ hence "list_all bound0 (disjuncts p)" by (induct p rule:disjuncts.induct,auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+
+lemma disjuncts_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q"
+proof-
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ hence "list_all qfree (disjuncts p)"
+ by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+
+constdefs DJ :: "(fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "DJ f p \<equiv> evaldjf f (disjuncts p)"
+
+lemma DJ: assumes fdj: "\<forall> p q. f (Or p q) = Or (f p) (f q)"
+ and fF: "f F = F"
+ shows "Ifm bbs bs (DJ f p) = Ifm bbs bs (f p)"
+proof-
+ have "Ifm bbs bs (DJ f p) = (\<exists> q \<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs (f q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bbs bs (f p)" using fdj fF by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma DJ_qf: assumes
+ fqf: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (f p)"
+ shows "\<forall>p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ f p) "
+proof(clarify)
+ fix p assume qf: "qfree p"
+ have th: "DJ f p = evaldjf f (disjuncts p)" by (simp add: DJ_def)
+ from disjuncts_qf[OF qf] have "\<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q" .
+ with fqf have th':"\<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree (f q)" by blast
+
+ from evaldjf_qf[OF th'] th show "qfree (DJ f p)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma DJ_qe: assumes qe: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bbs bs (qe p) = Ifm bbs bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> (Ifm bbs bs ((DJ qe p)) = Ifm bbs bs (E p))"
+proof(clarify)
+ fix p::fm and bs
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ from qe have qth: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p)" by blast
+ from DJ_qf[OF qth] qf have qfth:"qfree (DJ qe p)" by auto
+ have "Ifm bbs bs (DJ qe p) = (\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs (qe q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> q \<in> set(disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs (E q))" using qe disjuncts_qf[OF qf] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bbs bs (E p)" by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show "qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> Ifm bbs bs (DJ qe p) = Ifm bbs bs (E p)" using qfth by blast
+qed
+ (* Simplification *)
+
+ (* Algebraic simplifications for nums *)
+consts bnds:: "num \<Rightarrow> nat list"
+ lex_ns:: "nat list \<times> nat list \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef bnds "measure size"
+ "bnds (Bound n) = [n]"
+ "bnds (CN n c a) = n#(bnds a)"
+ "bnds (Neg a) = bnds a"
+ "bnds (Add a b) = (bnds a)@(bnds b)"
+ "bnds (Sub a b) = (bnds a)@(bnds b)"
+ "bnds (Mul i a) = bnds a"
+ "bnds a = []"
+recdef lex_ns "measure (\<lambda> (xs,ys). length xs + length ys)"
+ "lex_ns ([], ms) = True"
+ "lex_ns (ns, []) = False"
+ "lex_ns (n#ns, m#ms) = (n<m \<or> ((n = m) \<and> lex_ns (ns,ms))) "
+constdefs lex_bnd :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> bool"
+ "lex_bnd t s \<equiv> lex_ns (bnds t, bnds s)"
+
+consts
+ numadd:: "num \<times> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+recdef numadd "measure (\<lambda> (t,s). num_size t + num_size s)"
+ "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1 ,CN n2 c2 r2) =
+ (if n1=n2 then
+ (let c = c1 + c2
+ in (if c=0 then numadd(r1,r2) else CN n1 c (numadd (r1,r2))))
+ else if n1 \<le> n2 then CN n1 c1 (numadd (r1,Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) r2))
+ else CN n2 c2 (numadd (Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) r1,r2)))"
+ "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1, t) = CN n1 c1 (numadd (r1, t))"
+ "numadd (t,CN n2 c2 r2) = CN n2 c2 (numadd (t,r2))"
+ "numadd (C b1, C b2) = C (b1+b2)"
+ "numadd (a,b) = Add a b"
+
+(*function (sequential)
+ numadd :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+where
+ "numadd (Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) r1) (Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) r2) =
+ (if n1 = n2 then (let c = c1 + c2
+ in (if c = 0 then numadd r1 r2 else
+ Add (Mul c (Bound n1)) (numadd r1 r2)))
+ else if n1 \<le> n2 then
+ Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) (numadd r1 (Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) r2))
+ else
+ Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) (numadd (Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) r1) r2))"
+ | "numadd (Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) r1) t =
+ Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) (numadd r1 t)"
+ | "numadd t (Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) r2) =
+ Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) (numadd t r2)"
+ | "numadd (C b1) (C b2) = C (b1 + b2)"
+ | "numadd a b = Add a b"
+apply pat_completeness apply auto*)
+
+lemma numadd: "Inum bs (numadd (t,s)) = Inum bs (Add t s)"
+apply (induct t s rule: numadd.induct, simp_all add: Let_def)
+apply (case_tac "c1+c2 = 0",case_tac "n1 \<le> n2", simp_all)
+ apply (case_tac "n1 = n2")
+ apply(simp_all add: algebra_simps)
+apply(simp add: left_distrib[symmetric])
+done
+
+lemma numadd_nb: "\<lbrakk> numbound0 t ; numbound0 s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numadd (t,s))"
+by (induct t s rule: numadd.induct, auto simp add: Let_def)
+
+fun
+ nummul :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+where
+ "nummul i (C j) = C (i * j)"
+ | "nummul i (CN n c t) = CN n (c*i) (nummul i t)"
+ | "nummul i t = Mul i t"
+
+lemma nummul: "\<And> i. Inum bs (nummul i t) = Inum bs (Mul i t)"
+by (induct t rule: nummul.induct, auto simp add: algebra_simps numadd)
+
+lemma nummul_nb: "\<And> i. numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (nummul i t)"
+by (induct t rule: nummul.induct, auto simp add: numadd_nb)
+
+constdefs numneg :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ "numneg t \<equiv> nummul (- 1) t"
+
+constdefs numsub :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ "numsub s t \<equiv> (if s = t then C 0 else numadd (s, numneg t))"
+
+lemma numneg: "Inum bs (numneg t) = Inum bs (Neg t)"
+using numneg_def nummul by simp
+
+lemma numneg_nb: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numneg t)"
+using numneg_def nummul_nb by simp
+
+lemma numsub: "Inum bs (numsub a b) = Inum bs (Sub a b)"
+using numneg numadd numsub_def by simp
+
+lemma numsub_nb: "\<lbrakk> numbound0 t ; numbound0 s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numsub t s)"
+using numsub_def numadd_nb numneg_nb by simp
+
+fun
+ simpnum :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+where
+ "simpnum (C j) = C j"
+ | "simpnum (Bound n) = CN n 1 (C 0)"
+ | "simpnum (Neg t) = numneg (simpnum t)"
+ | "simpnum (Add t s) = numadd (simpnum t, simpnum s)"
+ | "simpnum (Sub t s) = numsub (simpnum t) (simpnum s)"
+ | "simpnum (Mul i t) = (if i = 0 then C 0 else nummul i (simpnum t))"
+ | "simpnum t = t"
+
+lemma simpnum_ci: "Inum bs (simpnum t) = Inum bs t"
+by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto simp add: numneg numadd numsub nummul)
+
+lemma simpnum_numbound0:
+ "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (simpnum t)"
+by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto simp add: numadd_nb numsub_nb nummul_nb numneg_nb)
+
+fun
+ not :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "not (NOT p) = p"
+ | "not T = F"
+ | "not F = T"
+ | "not p = NOT p"
+lemma not: "Ifm bbs bs (not p) = Ifm bbs bs (NOT p)"
+by (cases p) auto
+lemma not_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (not p)"
+by (cases p, auto)
+lemma not_bn: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (not p)"
+by (cases p, auto)
+
+constdefs conj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "conj p q \<equiv> (if (p = F \<or> q=F) then F else if p=T then q else if q=T then p else And p q)"
+lemma conj: "Ifm bbs bs (conj p q) = Ifm bbs bs (And p q)"
+by (cases "p=F \<or> q=F",simp_all add: conj_def) (cases p,simp_all)
+
+lemma conj_qf: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (conj p q)"
+using conj_def by auto
+lemma conj_nb: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (conj p q)"
+using conj_def by auto
+
+constdefs disj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "disj p q \<equiv> (if (p = T \<or> q=T) then T else if p=F then q else if q=F then p else Or p q)"
+
+lemma disj: "Ifm bbs bs (disj p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Or p q)"
+by (cases "p=T \<or> q=T",simp_all add: disj_def) (cases p,simp_all)
+lemma disj_qf: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (disj p q)"
+using disj_def by auto
+lemma disj_nb: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (disj p q)"
+using disj_def by auto
+
+constdefs imp :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "imp p q \<equiv> (if (p = F \<or> q=T) then T else if p=T then q else if q=F then not p else Imp p q)"
+lemma imp: "Ifm bbs bs (imp p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Imp p q)"
+by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def,cases p) (simp_all add: not)
+lemma imp_qf: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (imp p q)"
+using imp_def by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def,cases p) (simp_all add: not_qf)
+lemma imp_nb: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (imp p q)"
+using imp_def by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def,cases p) simp_all
+
+constdefs iff :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "iff p q \<equiv> (if (p = q) then T else if (p = not q \<or> not p = q) then F else
+ if p=F then not q else if q=F then not p else if p=T then q else if q=T then p else
+ Iff p q)"
+lemma iff: "Ifm bbs bs (iff p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Iff p q)"
+ by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", simp,cases "p=not q", simp add:not)
+(cases "not p= q", auto simp add:not)
+lemma iff_qf: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (iff p q)"
+ by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", auto simp add: not_qf)
+lemma iff_nb: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (iff p q)"
+using iff_def by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", auto simp add: not_bn)
+
+function (sequential)
+ simpfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "simpfm (And p q) = conj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ | "simpfm (Or p q) = disj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ | "simpfm (Imp p q) = imp (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ | "simpfm (Iff p q) = iff (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ | "simpfm (NOT p) = not (simpfm p)"
+ | "simpfm (Lt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v < 0) then T else F
+ | _ \<Rightarrow> Lt a')"
+ | "simpfm (Le a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<le> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Le a')"
+ | "simpfm (Gt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v > 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Gt a')"
+ | "simpfm (Ge a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<ge> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Ge a')"
+ | "simpfm (Eq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v = 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Eq a')"
+ | "simpfm (NEq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<noteq> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> NEq a')"
+ | "simpfm (Dvd i a) = (if i=0 then simpfm (Eq a)
+ else if (abs i = 1) then T
+ else let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (i dvd v) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Dvd i a')"
+ | "simpfm (NDvd i a) = (if i=0 then simpfm (NEq a)
+ else if (abs i = 1) then F
+ else let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (\<not>(i dvd v)) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> NDvd i a')"
+ | "simpfm p = p"
+by pat_completeness auto
+termination by (relation "measure fmsize") auto
+
+lemma simpfm: "Ifm bbs bs (simpfm p) = Ifm bbs bs p"
+proof(induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
+ case (6 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (10 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (11 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (12 i a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" from simpnum_ci
+ have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ have "i=0 \<or> abs i = 1 \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> (abs i \<noteq> 1))" by auto
+ {assume "i=0" hence ?case using "12.hyps" by (simp add: dvd_def Let_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume i1: "abs i = 1"
+ from zdvd_1_left[where m = "Inum bs a"] uminus_dvd_conv[where d="1" and t="Inum bs a"]
+ have ?case using i1 apply (cases "i=0", simp_all add: Let_def)
+ by (cases "i > 0", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and cond: "abs i \<noteq> 1"
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa[symmetric] inz cond
+ by (cases "abs i = 1", auto) }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ hence "simpfm (Dvd i a) = Dvd i ?sa" using inz cond
+ by (cases ?sa, auto simp add: Let_def)
+ hence ?case using sa by simp}
+ ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (13 i a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" from simpnum_ci
+ have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ have "i=0 \<or> abs i = 1 \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> (abs i \<noteq> 1))" by auto
+ {assume "i=0" hence ?case using "13.hyps" by (simp add: dvd_def Let_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume i1: "abs i = 1"
+ from zdvd_1_left[where m = "Inum bs a"] uminus_dvd_conv[where d="1" and t="Inum bs a"]
+ have ?case using i1 apply (cases "i=0", simp_all add: Let_def)
+ apply (cases "i > 0", simp_all) done}
+ moreover
+ {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and cond: "abs i \<noteq> 1"
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa[symmetric] inz cond
+ by (cases "abs i = 1", auto) }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ hence "simpfm (NDvd i a) = NDvd i ?sa" using inz cond
+ by (cases ?sa, auto simp add: Let_def)
+ hence ?case using sa by simp}
+ ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed (induct p rule: simpfm.induct, simp_all add: conj disj imp iff not)
+
+lemma simpfm_bound0: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (simpfm p)"
+proof(induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
+ case (6 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (7 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (8 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (9 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (10 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (11 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (12 i a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (13 i a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+qed(auto simp add: disj_def imp_def iff_def conj_def not_bn)
+
+lemma simpfm_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (simpfm p)"
+by (induct p rule: simpfm.induct, auto simp add: disj_qf imp_qf iff_qf conj_qf not_qf Let_def)
+ (case_tac "simpnum a",auto)+
+
+ (* Generic quantifier elimination *)
+consts qelim :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef qelim "measure fmsize"
+ "qelim (E p) = (\<lambda> qe. DJ qe (qelim p qe))"
+ "qelim (A p) = (\<lambda> qe. not (qe ((qelim (NOT p) qe))))"
+ "qelim (NOT p) = (\<lambda> qe. not (qelim p qe))"
+ "qelim (And p q) = (\<lambda> qe. conj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Or p q) = (\<lambda> qe. disj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Imp p q) = (\<lambda> qe. imp (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Iff p q) = (\<lambda> qe. iff (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim p = (\<lambda> y. simpfm p)"
+
+(*function (sequential)
+ qelim :: "(fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "qelim qe (E p) = DJ qe (qelim qe p)"
+ | "qelim qe (A p) = not (qe ((qelim qe (NOT p))))"
+ | "qelim qe (NOT p) = not (qelim qe p)"
+ | "qelim qe (And p q) = conj (qelim qe p) (qelim qe q)"
+ | "qelim qe (Or p q) = disj (qelim qe p) (qelim qe q)"
+ | "qelim qe (Imp p q) = imp (qelim qe p) (qelim qe q)"
+ | "qelim qe (Iff p q) = iff (qelim qe p) (qelim qe q)"
+ | "qelim qe p = simpfm p"
+by pat_completeness auto
+termination by (relation "measure (fmsize o snd)") auto*)
+
+lemma qelim_ci:
+ assumes qe_inv: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bbs bs (qe p) = Ifm bbs bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<And> bs. qfree (qelim p qe) \<and> (Ifm bbs bs (qelim p qe) = Ifm bbs bs p)"
+using qe_inv DJ_qe[OF qe_inv]
+by(induct p rule: qelim.induct)
+(auto simp add: not disj conj iff imp not_qf disj_qf conj_qf imp_qf iff_qf
+ simpfm simpfm_qf simp del: simpfm.simps)
+ (* Linearity for fm where Bound 0 ranges over \<int> *)
+
+fun
+ zsplit0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<times> num" (* splits the bounded from the unbounded part*)
+where
+ "zsplit0 (C c) = (0,C c)"
+ | "zsplit0 (Bound n) = (if n=0 then (1, C 0) else (0,Bound n))"
+ | "zsplit0 (CN n i a) =
+ (let (i',a') = zsplit0 a
+ in if n=0 then (i+i', a') else (i',CN n i a'))"
+ | "zsplit0 (Neg a) = (let (i',a') = zsplit0 a in (-i', Neg a'))"
+ | "zsplit0 (Add a b) = (let (ia,a') = zsplit0 a ;
+ (ib,b') = zsplit0 b
+ in (ia+ib, Add a' b'))"
+ | "zsplit0 (Sub a b) = (let (ia,a') = zsplit0 a ;
+ (ib,b') = zsplit0 b
+ in (ia-ib, Sub a' b'))"
+ | "zsplit0 (Mul i a) = (let (i',a') = zsplit0 a in (i*i', Mul i a'))"
+
+lemma zsplit0_I:
+ shows "\<And> n a. zsplit0 t = (n,a) \<Longrightarrow> (Inum ((x::int) #bs) (CN 0 n a) = Inum (x #bs) t) \<and> numbound0 a"
+ (is "\<And> n a. ?S t = (n,a) \<Longrightarrow> (?I x (CN 0 n a) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N a")
+proof(induct t rule: zsplit0.induct)
+ case (1 c n a) thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (2 m n a) thus ?case by (cases "m=0") auto
+next
+ case (3 m i a n a')
+ let ?j = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?b = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have abj: "zsplit0 a = (?j,?b)" by simp
+ {assume "m\<noteq>0"
+ with prems(1)[OF abj] prems(2) have ?case by (auto simp add: Let_def split_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume m0: "m =0"
+ from abj have th: "a'=?b \<and> n=i+?j" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abj prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?j ?b) = ?I x a) \<and> ?N ?b" by blast
+ from th have "?I x (CN 0 n a') = ?I x (CN 0 (i+?j) ?b)" by simp
+ also from th2 have "\<dots> = ?I x (CN 0 i (CN 0 ?j ?b))" by (simp add: left_distrib)
+ finally have "?I x (CN 0 n a') = ?I x (CN 0 i a)" using th2 by simp
+ with th2 th have ?case using m0 by blast}
+ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 t n a)
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp hence th: "a=Neg ?at \<and> n=-?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abj prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ from th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (5 s t n a)
+ let ?ns = "fst (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?as = "snd (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abjs: "zsplit0 s = (?ns,?as)" by simp
+ moreover have abjt: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp
+ ultimately have th: "a=Add ?as ?at \<and> n=?ns + ?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abjs[symmetric] have bluddy: "\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s" by blast
+ from prems have "(\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>xa xb. zsplit0 t = (xa, xb) \<longrightarrow> Inum (x # bs) (CN 0 xa xb) = Inum (x # bs) t \<and> numbound0 xb)" by auto
+ with bluddy abjt have th3: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ from abjs prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?ns ?as) = ?I x s) \<and> ?N ?as" by blast
+ from th3[simplified] th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
+ by (simp add: left_distrib)
+next
+ case (6 s t n a)
+ let ?ns = "fst (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?as = "snd (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abjs: "zsplit0 s = (?ns,?as)" by simp
+ moreover have abjt: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp
+ ultimately have th: "a=Sub ?as ?at \<and> n=?ns - ?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abjs[symmetric] have bluddy: "\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s" by blast
+ from prems have "(\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>xa xb. zsplit0 t = (xa, xb) \<longrightarrow> Inum (x # bs) (CN 0 xa xb) = Inum (x # bs) t \<and> numbound0 xb)" by auto
+ with bluddy abjt have th3: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ from abjs prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?ns ?as) = ?I x s) \<and> ?N ?as" by blast
+ from th3[simplified] th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
+ by (simp add: left_diff_distrib)
+next
+ case (7 i t n a)
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp hence th: "a=Mul i ?at \<and> n=i*?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abj prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ hence " ?I x (Mul i t) = i * ?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ?I x (CN 0 (i*?nt) (Mul i ?at))" by (simp add: right_distrib)
+ finally show ?case using th th2 by simp
+qed
+
+consts
+ iszlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* Linearity test for fm *)
+recdef iszlfm "measure size"
+ "iszlfm (And p q) = (iszlfm p \<and> iszlfm q)"
+ "iszlfm (Or p q) = (iszlfm p \<and> iszlfm q)"
+ "iszlfm (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = ( c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =
+ (c>0 \<and> i>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=
+ (c>0 \<and> i>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "iszlfm p = (isatom p \<and> (bound0 p))"
+
+lemma zlin_qfree: "iszlfm p \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
+ by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) auto
+
+consts
+ zlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Linearity transformation for fm *)
+recdef zlfm "measure fmsize"
+ "zlfm (And p q) = And (zlfm p) (zlfm q)"
+ "zlfm (Or p q) = Or (zlfm p) (zlfm q)"
+ "zlfm (Imp p q) = Or (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm q)"
+ "zlfm (Iff p q) = Or (And (zlfm p) (zlfm q)) (And (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm (NOT q)))"
+ "zlfm (Lt a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Lt r else
+ if c>0 then (Lt (CN 0 c r)) else (Gt (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r))))"
+ "zlfm (Le a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Le r else
+ if c>0 then (Le (CN 0 c r)) else (Ge (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r))))"
+ "zlfm (Gt a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Gt r else
+ if c>0 then (Gt (CN 0 c r)) else (Lt (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r))))"
+ "zlfm (Ge a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Ge r else
+ if c>0 then (Ge (CN 0 c r)) else (Le (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r))))"
+ "zlfm (Eq a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Eq r else
+ if c>0 then (Eq (CN 0 c r)) else (Eq (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r))))"
+ "zlfm (NEq a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then NEq r else
+ if c>0 then (NEq (CN 0 c r)) else (NEq (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r))))"
+ "zlfm (Dvd i a) = (if i=0 then zlfm (Eq a)
+ else (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then (Dvd (abs i) r) else
+ if c>0 then (Dvd (abs i) (CN 0 c r))
+ else (Dvd (abs i) (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))))"
+ "zlfm (NDvd i a) = (if i=0 then zlfm (NEq a)
+ else (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then (NDvd (abs i) r) else
+ if c>0 then (NDvd (abs i) (CN 0 c r))
+ else (NDvd (abs i) (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (And p q)) = Or (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm (NOT q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Or p q)) = And (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm (NOT q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Imp p q)) = And (zlfm p) (zlfm (NOT q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Iff p q)) = Or (And(zlfm p) (zlfm(NOT q))) (And (zlfm(NOT p)) (zlfm q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NOT p)) = zlfm p"
+ "zlfm (NOT T) = F"
+ "zlfm (NOT F) = T"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Lt a)) = zlfm (Ge a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Le a)) = zlfm (Gt a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Gt a)) = zlfm (Le a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Ge a)) = zlfm (Lt a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Eq a)) = zlfm (NEq a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NEq a)) = zlfm (Eq a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Dvd i a)) = zlfm (NDvd i a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NDvd i a)) = zlfm (Dvd i a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Closed P)) = NClosed P"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NClosed P)) = Closed P"
+ "zlfm p = p" (hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+
+lemma zlfm_I:
+ assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "(Ifm bbs (i#bs) (zlfm p) = Ifm bbs (i# bs) p) \<and> iszlfm (zlfm p)"
+ (is "(?I (?l p) = ?I p) \<and> ?L (?l p)")
+using qfp
+proof(induct p rule: zlfm.induct)
+ case (5 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ from prems Ia nb show ?case
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done
+next
+ case (6 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ from prems Ia nb show ?case
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done
+next
+ case (7 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ from prems Ia nb show ?case
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done
+next
+ case (8 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ from prems Ia nb show ?case
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done
+next
+ case (9 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ from prems Ia nb show ?case
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done
+next
+ case (10 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ from prems Ia nb show ?case
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done
+next
+ case (11 j a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ have "j=0 \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c = 0) \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c >0) \<or> (j\<noteq> 0 \<and> ?c<0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "j=0" hence z: "zlfm (Dvd j a) = (zlfm (Eq a))" by (simp add: Let_def)
+ hence ?case using prems by (simp del: zlfm.simps add: zdvd_0_left)}
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" and "j\<noteq>0" hence ?case
+ using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
+ hence ?case using Ia cp jnz by (simp add: Let_def split_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
+ hence ?case using Ia cn jnz zdvd_zminus_iff[where m="abs j" and n="?c*i + ?N ?r" ]
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def) }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (12 j a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ have "j=0 \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c = 0) \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c >0) \<or> (j\<noteq> 0 \<and> ?c<0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "j=0" hence z: "zlfm (NDvd j a) = (zlfm (NEq a))" by (simp add: Let_def)
+ hence ?case using prems by (simp del: zlfm.simps add: zdvd_0_left)}
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" and "j\<noteq>0" hence ?case
+ using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ apply (cases "?r",auto)
+ apply (case_tac nat, auto)
+ done}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
+ hence ?case using Ia cp jnz by (simp add: Let_def split_def) }
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
+ hence ?case using Ia cn jnz zdvd_zminus_iff[where m="abs j" and n="?c*i + ?N ?r" ]
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed auto
+
+consts
+ plusinf:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Virtual substitution of +\<infinity>*)
+ minusinf:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Virtual substitution of -\<infinity>*)
+ \<delta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int" (* Compute lcm {d| N\<^isup>?\<^isup> Dvd c*x+t \<in> p}*)
+ d\<delta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool" (* checks if a given l divides all the ds above*)
+
+recdef minusinf "measure size"
+ "minusinf (And p q) = And (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
+ "minusinf (Or p q) = Or (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
+ "minusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf p = p"
+
+lemma minusinf_qfree: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (minusinf p)"
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto)
+
+recdef plusinf "measure size"
+ "plusinf (And p q) = And (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
+ "plusinf (Or p q) = Or (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
+ "plusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf p = p"
+
+recdef \<delta> "measure size"
+ "\<delta> (And p q) = zlcm (\<delta> p) (\<delta> q)"
+ "\<delta> (Or p q) = zlcm (\<delta> p) (\<delta> q)"
+ "\<delta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = i"
+ "\<delta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = i"
+ "\<delta> p = 1"
+
+recdef d\<delta> "measure size"
+ "d\<delta> (And p q) = (\<lambda> d. d\<delta> p d \<and> d\<delta> q d)"
+ "d\<delta> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> d. d\<delta> p d \<and> d\<delta> q d)"
+ "d\<delta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> d. i dvd d)"
+ "d\<delta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> d. i dvd d)"
+ "d\<delta> p = (\<lambda> d. True)"
+
+lemma delta_mono:
+ assumes lin: "iszlfm p"
+ and d: "d dvd d'"
+ and ad: "d\<delta> p d"
+ shows "d\<delta> p d'"
+ using lin ad d
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (9 i c e) thus ?case using d
+ by (simp add: zdvd_trans[where m="i" and n="d" and k="d'"])
+next
+ case (10 i c e) thus ?case using d
+ by (simp add: zdvd_trans[where m="i" and n="d" and k="d'"])
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma \<delta> : assumes lin:"iszlfm p"
+ shows "d\<delta> p (\<delta> p) \<and> \<delta> p >0"
+using lin
+proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (1 p q)
+ let ?d = "\<delta> (And p q)"
+ from prems zlcm_pos have dp: "?d >0" by simp
+ have d1: "\<delta> p dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp
+ hence th: "d\<delta> p ?d" using delta_mono prems(3-4) by(simp del:dvd_zlcm_self1)
+ have "\<delta> q dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp
+ hence th': "d\<delta> q ?d" using delta_mono prems by(simp del:dvd_zlcm_self2)
+ from th th' dp show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (2 p q)
+ let ?d = "\<delta> (And p q)"
+ from prems zlcm_pos have dp: "?d >0" by simp
+ have "\<delta> p dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp
+ hence th: "d\<delta> p ?d" using delta_mono prems by(simp del:dvd_zlcm_self1)
+ have "\<delta> q dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp
+ hence th': "d\<delta> q ?d" using delta_mono prems by(simp del:dvd_zlcm_self2)
+ from th th' dp show ?case by simp
+qed simp_all
+
+
+consts
+ a\<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> fm" (* adjusts the coeffitients of a formula *)
+ d\<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool" (* tests if all coeffs c of c divide a given l*)
+ \<zeta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int" (* computes the lcm of all coefficients of x*)
+ \<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> num list"
+ \<alpha> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> num list"
+
+recdef a\<beta> "measure size"
+ "a\<beta> (And p q) = (\<lambda> k. And (a\<beta> p k) (a\<beta> q k))"
+ "a\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> k. Or (a\<beta> p k) (a\<beta> q k))"
+ "a\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Eq (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. NEq (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Lt (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Le (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Gt (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Ge (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =(\<lambda> k. Dvd ((k div c)*i) (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=(\<lambda> k. NDvd ((k div c)*i) (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> p = (\<lambda> k. p)"
+
+recdef d\<beta> "measure size"
+ "d\<beta> (And p q) = (\<lambda> k. (d\<beta> p k) \<and> (d\<beta> q k))"
+ "d\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> k. (d\<beta> p k) \<and> (d\<beta> q k))"
+ "d\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =(\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=(\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> p = (\<lambda> k. True)"
+
+recdef \<zeta> "measure size"
+ "\<zeta> (And p q) = zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
+ "\<zeta> (Or p q) = zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
+ "\<zeta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))= c"
+ "\<zeta> p = 1"
+
+recdef \<beta> "measure size"
+ "\<beta> (And p q) = (\<beta> p @ \<beta> q)"
+ "\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<beta> p @ \<beta> q)"
+ "\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [Sub (C -1) e]"
+ "\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [Neg e]"
+ "\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = [Neg e]"
+ "\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = [Sub (C -1) e]"
+ "\<beta> p = []"
+
+recdef \<alpha> "measure size"
+ "\<alpha> (And p q) = (\<alpha> p @ \<alpha> q)"
+ "\<alpha> (Or p q) = (\<alpha> p @ \<alpha> q)"
+ "\<alpha> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [Add (C -1) e]"
+ "\<alpha> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [e]"
+ "\<alpha> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = [e]"
+ "\<alpha> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = [Add (C -1) e]"
+ "\<alpha> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<alpha> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<alpha> p = []"
+consts mirror :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef mirror "measure size"
+ "mirror (And p q) = And (mirror p) (mirror q)"
+ "mirror (Or p q) = Or (mirror p) (mirror q)"
+ "mirror (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = Eq (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = NEq (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = Gt (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Le (CN 0 c e)) = Ge (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = Lt (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = Le (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = Dvd i (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = NDvd i (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror p = p"
+ (* Lemmas for the correctness of \<sigma>\<rho> *)
+lemma dvd1_eq1: "x >0 \<Longrightarrow> (x::int) dvd 1 = (x = 1)"
+by simp
+
+lemma minusinf_inf:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ shows "\<exists> (z::int). \<forall> x < z. Ifm bbs (x#bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm bbs (x#bs) p"
+ (is "?P p" is "\<exists> (z::int). \<forall> x < z. ?I x (?M p) = ?I x p")
+using linp u
+proof (induct p rule: minusinf.induct)
+ case (1 p q) thus ?case
+ by auto (rule_tac x="min z za" in exI,simp)
+next
+ case (2 p q) thus ?case
+ by auto (rule_tac x="min z za" in exI,simp)
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ fix a
+ from 3 have "\<forall> x<(- Inum (a#bs) e). c*x + Inum (x#bs) e \<noteq> 0"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x assume "x < (- Inum (a#bs) e)" and"x + Inum (x#bs) e = 0"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ show "False" by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (4 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ fix a
+ from 4 have "\<forall> x<(- Inum (a#bs) e). c*x + Inum (x#bs) e \<noteq> 0"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x assume "x < (- Inum (a#bs) e)" and"x + Inum (x#bs) e = 0"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ show "False" by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (5 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ fix a
+ from 5 have "\<forall> x<(- Inum (a#bs) e). c*x + Inum (x#bs) e < 0"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x assume "x < (- Inum (a#bs) e)"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ show "x + Inum (x#bs) e < 0" by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ fix a
+ from 6 have "\<forall> x<(- Inum (a#bs) e). c*x + Inum (x#bs) e \<le> 0"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x assume "x < (- Inum (a#bs) e)"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ show "x + Inum (x#bs) e \<le> 0" by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ fix a
+ from 7 have "\<forall> x<(- Inum (a#bs) e). \<not> (c*x + Inum (x#bs) e > 0)"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x assume "x < (- Inum (a#bs) e)" and"x + Inum (x#bs) e > 0"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ show "False" by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ fix a
+ from 8 have "\<forall> x<(- Inum (a#bs) e). \<not> (c*x + Inum (x#bs) e \<ge> 0)"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x assume "x < (- Inum (a#bs) e)" and"x + Inum (x#bs) e \<ge> 0"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ show "False" by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by auto
+qed auto
+
+lemma minusinf_repeats:
+ assumes d: "d\<delta> p d" and linp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "Ifm bbs ((x - k*d)#bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm bbs (x #bs) (minusinf p)"
+using linp d
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (9 i c e) hence nbe: "numbound0 e" and id: "i dvd d" by simp+
+ hence "\<exists> k. d=i*k" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ then obtain "di" where di_def: "d=i*di" by blast
+ show ?case
+ proof(simp add: numbound0_I[OF nbe,where bs="bs" and b="x - k * d" and b'="x"] right_diff_distrib, rule iffI)
+ assume
+ "i dvd c * x - c*(k*d) + Inum (x # bs) e"
+ (is "?ri dvd ?rc*?rx - ?rc*(?rk*?rd) + ?I x e" is "?ri dvd ?rt")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rt = i * l" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+ ?I x e = i*l+c*(k * i*di)"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+ ?I x e = i*(l + c*k*di)"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+ ?I x e = i*l" by blast
+ thus "i dvd c*x + Inum (x # bs) e" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ next
+ assume
+ "i dvd c*x + Inum (x # bs) e" (is "?ri dvd ?rc*?rx+?e")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+?e = i*l" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c*(k*d) +?e = i*l - c*(k*d)" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c*(k*d) +?e = i*l - c*(k*i*di)" by (simp add: di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c*(k*d) +?e = i*((l - c*k*di))" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c * (k*d) +?e = i*l"
+ by blast
+ thus "i dvd c*x - c*(k*d) + Inum (x # bs) e" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ qed
+next
+ case (10 i c e) hence nbe: "numbound0 e" and id: "i dvd d" by simp+
+ hence "\<exists> k. d=i*k" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ then obtain "di" where di_def: "d=i*di" by blast
+ show ?case
+ proof(simp add: numbound0_I[OF nbe,where bs="bs" and b="x - k * d" and b'="x"] right_diff_distrib, rule iffI)
+ assume
+ "i dvd c * x - c*(k*d) + Inum (x # bs) e"
+ (is "?ri dvd ?rc*?rx - ?rc*(?rk*?rd) + ?I x e" is "?ri dvd ?rt")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rt = i * l" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+ ?I x e = i*l+c*(k * i*di)"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+ ?I x e = i*(l + c*k*di)"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+ ?I x e = i*l" by blast
+ thus "i dvd c*x + Inum (x # bs) e" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ next
+ assume
+ "i dvd c*x + Inum (x # bs) e" (is "?ri dvd ?rc*?rx+?e")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x+?e = i*l" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c*(k*d) +?e = i*l - c*(k*d)" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c*(k*d) +?e = i*l - c*(k*i*di)" by (simp add: di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c*(k*d) +?e = i*((l - c*k*di))" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). c*x - c * (k*d) +?e = i*l"
+ by blast
+ thus "i dvd c*x - c*(k*d) + Inum (x # bs) e" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ qed
+qed (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="x - k*d" and b'="x"])
+
+lemma mirror\<alpha>\<beta>:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "(Inum (i#bs)) ` set (\<alpha> p) = (Inum (i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> (mirror p))"
+using lp
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct, auto)
+
+lemma mirror:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "Ifm bbs (x#bs) (mirror p) = Ifm bbs ((- x)#bs) p"
+using lp
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (9 j c e) hence nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ have "Ifm bbs (x#bs) (mirror (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))) = (j dvd c*x - Inum (x#bs) e)" (is "_ = (j dvd c*x - ?e)") by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd (- (c*x - ?e)))"
+ by (simp only: zdvd_zminus_iff)
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd (c* (- x)) + ?e)"
+ apply (simp only: minus_mult_right[symmetric] minus_mult_left[symmetric] diff_def zadd_ac zminus_zadd_distrib)
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bbs ((- x)#bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="- x"]
+ by simp
+ finally show ?case .
+next
+ case (10 j c e) hence nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ have "Ifm bbs (x#bs) (mirror (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))) = (j dvd c*x - Inum (x#bs) e)" (is "_ = (j dvd c*x - ?e)") by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd (- (c*x - ?e)))"
+ by (simp only: zdvd_zminus_iff)
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd (c* (- x)) + ?e)"
+ apply (simp only: minus_mult_right[symmetric] minus_mult_left[symmetric] diff_def zadd_ac zminus_zadd_distrib)
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bbs ((- x)#bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="- x"]
+ by simp
+ finally show ?case by simp
+qed (auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="- x"] gr0_conv_Suc)
+
+lemma mirror_l: "iszlfm p \<and> d\<beta> p 1
+ \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (mirror p) \<and> d\<beta> (mirror p) 1"
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct, auto)
+
+lemma mirror_\<delta>: "iszlfm p \<Longrightarrow> \<delta> (mirror p) = \<delta> p"
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct,auto)
+
+lemma \<beta>_numbound0: assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "\<forall> b\<in> set (\<beta> p). numbound0 b"
+ using lp by (induct p rule: \<beta>.induct,auto)
+
+lemma d\<beta>_mono:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
+ and dr: "d\<beta> p l"
+ and d: "l dvd l'"
+ shows "d\<beta> p l'"
+using dr linp zdvd_trans[where n="l" and k="l'", simplified d]
+by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma \<alpha>_l: assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "\<forall> b\<in> set (\<alpha> p). numbound0 b"
+using lp
+by(induct p rule: \<alpha>.induct, auto)
+
+lemma \<zeta>:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "\<zeta> p > 0 \<and> d\<beta> p (\<zeta> p)"
+using linp
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (1 p q)
+ from prems have dl1: "\<zeta> p dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems have dl2: "\<zeta> q dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems d\<beta>_mono[where p = "p" and l="\<zeta> p" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ d\<beta>_mono[where p = "q" and l="\<zeta> q" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ dl1 dl2 show ?case by (auto simp add: zlcm_pos)
+next
+ case (2 p q)
+ from prems have dl1: "\<zeta> p dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems have dl2: "\<zeta> q dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems d\<beta>_mono[where p = "p" and l="\<zeta> p" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ d\<beta>_mono[where p = "q" and l="\<zeta> q" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ dl1 dl2 show ?case by (auto simp add: zlcm_pos)
+qed (auto simp add: zlcm_pos)
+
+lemma a\<beta>: assumes linp: "iszlfm p" and d: "d\<beta> p l" and lp: "l > 0"
+ shows "iszlfm (a\<beta> p l) \<and> d\<beta> (a\<beta> p l) 1 \<and> (Ifm bbs (l*x #bs) (a\<beta> p l) = Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
+using linp d
+proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (5 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(l*x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e < 0) =
+ ((c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e < 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((l div c) * (c*x + Inum (x # bs) e) < (l div c) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (c*x + Inum (x # bs) e < 0)"
+ using mult_less_0_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c*x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="l*x" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be by simp
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(l*x + (l div c) * Inum (x# bs) e \<le> 0) =
+ ((c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) \<le> ((l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (c*x + Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0)"
+ using mult_le_0_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c*x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="l*x" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be by simp
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(l*x + (l div c)* Inum (x # bs) e > 0) =
+ ((c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e > 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) > ((l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e > 0)"
+ using zero_less_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be by simp
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(l*x + (l div c)* Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0) =
+ ((c*(l div c))*x + (l div c)* Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((l div c)*(c*x + Inum (x # bs) e) \<ge> ((l div c)) * 0)"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (c*x + Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0)" using ldcp
+ zero_le_mult_iff [where a="l div c" and b="c*x + Inum (x # bs) e"] by simp
+ finally show ?case using be numbound0_I[OF be,where b="l*x" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]
+ by simp
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = 0) =
+ ((c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) = ((l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e = 0)"
+ using mult_eq_0_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be by simp
+next
+ case (4 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0) =
+ ((c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) \<noteq> ((l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be by simp
+next
+ case (9 j c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and jp: "j > 0" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(\<exists> (k::int). l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k) = (\<exists> (k::int). (c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k) = (l div c)*0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also fix k have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k = 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k"] ldcp by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e = j * k)" by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be mult_strict_mono[OF ldcp jp ldcp ] by (simp add: dvd_def)
+next
+ case (10 j c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and jp: "j > 0" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(\<exists> (k::int). l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k) = (\<exists> (k::int). (c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k) = (l div c)*0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also fix k have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k = 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k"] ldcp by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e = j * k)" by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be mult_strict_mono[OF ldcp jp ldcp ] by (simp add: dvd_def)
+qed (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="(l * x)" and b'="x"])
+
+lemma a\<beta>_ex: assumes linp: "iszlfm p" and d: "d\<beta> p l" and lp: "l>0"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. l dvd x \<and> Ifm bbs (x #bs) (a\<beta> p l)) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. l dvd x \<and> ?P x) = (\<exists> x. ?P' x)")
+proof-
+ have "(\<exists> x. l dvd x \<and> ?P x) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?P (l*x))"
+ using unity_coeff_ex[where l="l" and P="?P", simplified] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (x::int). ?P' x)" using a\<beta>[OF linp d lp] by simp
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma \<beta>:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ and nob: "\<not>(\<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists> b\<in> (Inum (a#bs)) ` set(\<beta> p). x = b + j)"
+ and p: "Ifm bbs (x#bs) p" (is "?P x")
+ shows "?P (x - d)"
+using lp u d dp nob p
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (5 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ with dp p c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] prems
+ show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ with dp p c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] prems
+ show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (Gt (CN 0 c e))" and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
+ {assume "(x-d) +?e > 0" hence ?case using c1
+ numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "\<not> (x-d) + ?e > 0"
+ let ?v="Neg e"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ from prems(11)[simplified simp_thms Inum.simps \<beta>.simps set.simps bex_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]]
+ have nob: "\<not> (\<exists> j\<in> {1 ..d}. x = - ?e + j)" by auto
+ from H p have "x + ?e > 0 \<and> x + ?e \<le> d" by (simp add: c1)
+ hence "x + ?e \<ge> 1 \<and> x + ?e \<le> d" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. j = x + ?e" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. x = (- ?e + j)"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ with nob have ?case by auto}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (Ge (CN 0 c e))" and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e"
+ by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
+ {assume "(x-d) +?e \<ge> 0" hence ?case using c1
+ numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]
+ by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "\<not> (x-d) + ?e \<ge> 0"
+ let ?v="Sub (C -1) e"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ from prems(11)[simplified simp_thms Inum.simps \<beta>.simps set.simps bex_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]]
+ have nob: "\<not> (\<exists> j\<in> {1 ..d}. x = - ?e - 1 + j)" by auto
+ from H p have "x + ?e \<ge> 0 \<and> x + ?e < d" by (simp add: c1)
+ hence "x + ?e +1 \<ge> 1 \<and> x + ?e + 1 \<le> d" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. j = x + ?e + 1" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. x= - ?e - 1 + j" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ with nob have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (Eq (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
+ let ?v="(Sub (C -1) e)"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ from p have "x= - ?e" by (simp add: c1) with prems(11) show ?case using dp
+ by simp (erule ballE[where x="1"],
+ simp_all add:algebra_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="x"and b'="a"and bs="bs"])
+next
+ case (4 c e)hence p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (NEq (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
+ let ?v="Neg e"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ {assume "x - d + Inum (((x -d)) # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
+ hence ?case by (simp add: c1)}
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "x - d + Inum (((x -d)) # bs) e = 0"
+ hence "x = - Inum (((x -d)) # bs) e + d" by simp
+ hence "x = - Inum (a # bs) e + d"
+ by (simp add: numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="x - d"and b'="a"and bs="bs"])
+ with prems(11) have ?case using dp by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 j c e) hence p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
+ from prems have id: "j dvd d" by simp
+ from c1 have "?p x = (j dvd (x+ ?e))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd x - d + ?e)"
+ using zdvd_period[OF id, where x="x" and c="-1" and t="?e"] by simp
+ finally show ?case
+ using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] c1 p by simp
+next
+ case (10 j c e) hence p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (NDvd j (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
+ from prems have id: "j dvd d" by simp
+ from c1 have "?p x = (\<not> j dvd (x+ ?e))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> j dvd x - d + ?e)"
+ using zdvd_period[OF id, where x="x" and c="-1" and t="?e"] by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] c1 p by simp
+qed (auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="(x - d)" and b'="x"] gr0_conv_Suc)
+
+lemma \<beta>':
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "\<forall> x. \<not>(\<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists> b\<in> set(\<beta> p). Ifm bbs ((Inum (a#bs) b + j) #bs) p) \<longrightarrow> Ifm bbs (x#bs) p \<longrightarrow> Ifm bbs ((x - d)#bs) p" (is "\<forall> x. ?b \<longrightarrow> ?P x \<longrightarrow> ?P (x - d)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix x
+ assume nb:"?b" and px: "?P x"
+ hence nb2: "\<not>(\<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists> b\<in> (Inum (a#bs)) ` set(\<beta> p). x = b + j)"
+ by auto
+ from \<beta>[OF lp u d dp nb2 px] show "?P (x -d )" .
+qed
+lemma cpmi_eq: "0 < D \<Longrightarrow> (EX z::int. ALL x. x < z --> (P x = P1 x))
+==> ALL x.~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. P(b+j)) --> P (x) --> P (x - D)
+==> (ALL (x::int). ALL (k::int). ((P1 x)= (P1 (x-k*D))))
+==> (EX (x::int). P(x)) = ((EX (j::int) : {1..D} . (P1(j))) | (EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. P (b+j)))"
+apply(rule iffI)
+prefer 2
+apply(drule minusinfinity)
+apply assumption+
+apply(fastsimp)
+apply clarsimp
+apply(subgoal_tac "!!k. 0<=k \<Longrightarrow> !x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - k*D)")
+apply(frule_tac x = x and z=z in decr_lemma)
+apply(subgoal_tac "P1(x - (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1) * D)")
+prefer 2
+apply(subgoal_tac "0 <= (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)")
+prefer 2 apply arith
+ apply fastsimp
+apply(drule (1) periodic_finite_ex)
+apply blast
+apply(blast dest:decr_mult_lemma)
+done
+
+theorem cp_thm:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm bbs (x #bs) p) = (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. d}. Ifm bbs (j #bs) (minusinf p) \<or> (\<exists> b \<in> set (\<beta> p). Ifm bbs ((Inum (i#bs) b + j) #bs) p))"
+ (is "(\<exists> (x::int). ?P (x)) = (\<exists> j\<in> ?D. ?M j \<or> (\<exists> b\<in> ?B. ?P (?I b + j)))")
+proof-
+ from minusinf_inf[OF lp u]
+ have th: "\<exists>(z::int). \<forall>x<z. ?P (x) = ?M x" by blast
+ let ?B' = "{?I b | b. b\<in> ?B}"
+ have BB': "(\<exists>j\<in>?D. \<exists>b\<in> ?B. ?P (?I b +j)) = (\<exists> j \<in> ?D. \<exists> b \<in> ?B'. ?P (b + j))" by auto
+ hence th2: "\<forall> x. \<not> (\<exists> j \<in> ?D. \<exists> b \<in> ?B'. ?P ((b + j))) \<longrightarrow> ?P (x) \<longrightarrow> ?P ((x - d))"
+ using \<beta>'[OF lp u d dp, where a="i" and bbs = "bbs"] by blast
+ from minusinf_repeats[OF d lp]
+ have th3: "\<forall> x k. ?M x = ?M (x-k*d)" by simp
+ from cpmi_eq[OF dp th th2 th3] BB' show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+ (* Implement the right hand sides of Cooper's theorem and Ferrante and Rackoff. *)
+lemma mirror_ex:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) (mirror p)) = (\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x ?mp) = (\<exists> x. ?I x p)")
+proof(auto)
+ fix x assume "?I x ?mp" hence "?I (- x) p" using mirror[OF lp] by blast
+ thus "\<exists> x. ?I x p" by blast
+next
+ fix x assume "?I x p" hence "?I (- x) ?mp"
+ using mirror[OF lp, where x="- x", symmetric] by auto
+ thus "\<exists> x. ?I x ?mp" by blast
+qed
+
+
+lemma cp_thm':
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
+ and up: "d\<beta> p 1" and dd: "d\<delta> p d" and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1 .. d}. Ifm bbs (j#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. d}. \<exists> b\<in> (Inum (i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> p). Ifm bbs ((b+j)#bs) p))"
+ using cp_thm[OF lp up dd dp,where i="i"] by auto
+
+constdefs unit:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<times> num list \<times> int"
+ "unit p \<equiv> (let p' = zlfm p ; l = \<zeta> p' ; q = And (Dvd l (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (a\<beta> p' l); d = \<delta> q;
+ B = remdups (map simpnum (\<beta> q)) ; a = remdups (map simpnum (\<alpha> q))
+ in if length B \<le> length a then (q,B,d) else (mirror q, a,d))"
+
+lemma unit: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "\<And> q B d. unit p = (q,B,d) \<Longrightarrow> ((\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p) = (\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) q)) \<and> (Inum (i#bs)) ` set B = (Inum (i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> q) \<and> d\<beta> q 1 \<and> d\<delta> q d \<and> d >0 \<and> iszlfm q \<and> (\<forall> b\<in> set B. numbound0 b)"
+proof-
+ fix q B d
+ assume qBd: "unit p = (q,B,d)"
+ let ?thes = "((\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p) = (\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) q)) \<and>
+ Inum (i#bs) ` set B = Inum (i#bs) ` set (\<beta> q) \<and>
+ d\<beta> q 1 \<and> d\<delta> q d \<and> 0 < d \<and> iszlfm q \<and> (\<forall> b\<in> set B. numbound0 b)"
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> x p. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p"
+ let ?p' = "zlfm p"
+ let ?l = "\<zeta> ?p'"
+ let ?q = "And (Dvd ?l (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (a\<beta> ?p' ?l)"
+ let ?d = "\<delta> ?q"
+ let ?B = "set (\<beta> ?q)"
+ let ?B'= "remdups (map simpnum (\<beta> ?q))"
+ let ?A = "set (\<alpha> ?q)"
+ let ?A'= "remdups (map simpnum (\<alpha> ?q))"
+ from conjunct1[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs"]]
+ have pp': "\<forall> i. ?I i ?p' = ?I i p" by auto
+ from conjunct2[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs" and i="i"]]
+ have lp': "iszlfm ?p'" .
+ from lp' \<zeta>[where p="?p'"] have lp: "?l >0" and dl: "d\<beta> ?p' ?l" by auto
+ from a\<beta>_ex[where p="?p'" and l="?l" and bs="bs", OF lp' dl lp] pp'
+ have pq_ex:"(\<exists> (x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> x. ?I x ?q)" by simp
+ from lp' lp a\<beta>[OF lp' dl lp] have lq:"iszlfm ?q" and uq: "d\<beta> ?q 1" by auto
+ from \<delta>[OF lq] have dp:"?d >0" and dd: "d\<delta> ?q ?d" by blast+
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ have "?N ` set ?B' = ((?N o simpnum) ` ?B)" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?B" using simpnum_ci[where bs="i#bs"] by auto
+ finally have BB': "?N ` set ?B' = ?N ` ?B" .
+ have "?N ` set ?A' = ((?N o simpnum) ` ?A)" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?A" using simpnum_ci[where bs="i#bs"] by auto
+ finally have AA': "?N ` set ?A' = ?N ` ?A" .
+ from \<beta>_numbound0[OF lq] have B_nb:"\<forall> b\<in> set ?B'. numbound0 b"
+ by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0)
+ from \<alpha>_l[OF lq] have A_nb: "\<forall> b\<in> set ?A'. numbound0 b"
+ by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0)
+ {assume "length ?B' \<le> length ?A'"
+ hence q:"q=?q" and "B = ?B'" and d:"d = ?d"
+ using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def unit_def)
+ with BB' B_nb have b: "?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<beta> q)"
+ and bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b" by simp+
+ with pq_ex dp uq dd lq q d have ?thes by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> (length ?B' \<le> length ?A')"
+ hence q:"q=mirror ?q" and "B = ?A'" and d:"d = ?d"
+ using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def unit_def)
+ with AA' mirror\<alpha>\<beta>[OF lq] A_nb have b:"?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<beta> q)"
+ and bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b" by simp+
+ from mirror_ex[OF lq] pq_ex q
+ have pqm_eq:"(\<exists> (x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?I x q)" by simp
+ from lq uq q mirror_l[where p="?q"]
+ have lq': "iszlfm q" and uq: "d\<beta> q 1" by auto
+ from \<delta>[OF lq'] mirror_\<delta>[OF lq] q d have dq:"d\<delta> q d " by auto
+ from pqm_eq b bn uq lq' dp dq q dp d have ?thes by simp
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thes by blast
+qed
+ (* Cooper's Algorithm *)
+
+constdefs cooper :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "cooper p \<equiv>
+ (let (q,B,d) = unit p; js = iupt 1 d;
+ mq = simpfm (minusinf q);
+ md = evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) mq)) js
+ in if md = T then T else
+ (let qd = evaldjf (\<lambda> (b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) q))
+ [(b,j). b\<leftarrow>B,j\<leftarrow>js]
+ in decr (disj md qd)))"
+lemma cooper: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "((\<exists> x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p) = (Ifm bbs bs (cooper p))) \<and> qfree (cooper p)"
+ (is "(?lhs = ?rhs) \<and> _")
+proof-
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> x p. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p"
+ let ?q = "fst (unit p)"
+ let ?B = "fst (snd(unit p))"
+ let ?d = "snd (snd (unit p))"
+ let ?js = "iupt 1 ?d"
+ let ?mq = "minusinf ?q"
+ let ?smq = "simpfm ?mq"
+ let ?md = "evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js"
+ fix i
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (i#bs) t"
+ let ?Bjs = "[(b,j). b\<leftarrow>?B,j\<leftarrow>?js]"
+ let ?qd = "evaldjf (\<lambda> (b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)) ?Bjs"
+ have qbf:"unit p = (?q,?B,?d)" by simp
+ from unit[OF qf qbf] have pq_ex: "(\<exists>(x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?I x ?q)" and
+ B:"?N ` set ?B = ?N ` set (\<beta> ?q)" and
+ uq:"d\<beta> ?q 1" and dd: "d\<delta> ?q ?d" and dp: "?d > 0" and
+ lq: "iszlfm ?q" and
+ Bn: "\<forall> b\<in> set ?B. numbound0 b" by auto
+ from zlin_qfree[OF lq] have qfq: "qfree ?q" .
+ from simpfm_qf[OF minusinf_qfree[OF qfq]] have qfmq: "qfree ?smq".
+ have jsnb: "\<forall> j \<in> set ?js. numbound0 (C j)" by simp
+ hence "\<forall> j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (subst0 (C j) ?smq)"
+ by (auto simp only: subst0_bound0[OF qfmq])
+ hence th: "\<forall> j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))"
+ by (auto simp add: simpfm_bound0)
+ from evaldjf_bound0[OF th] have mdb: "bound0 ?md" by simp
+ from Bn jsnb have "\<forall> (b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. numbound0 (Add b (C j))"
+ by simp
+ hence "\<forall> (b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. bound0 (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)"
+ using subst0_bound0[OF qfq] by blast
+ hence "\<forall> (b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. bound0 (simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ hence th': "\<forall> x \<in> set ?Bjs. bound0 ((\<lambda> (b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)) x)"
+ by auto
+ from evaldjf_bound0 [OF th'] have qdb: "bound0 ?qd" by simp
+ from mdb qdb
+ have mdqdb: "bound0 (disj ?md ?qd)" by (simp only: disj_def, cases "?md=T \<or> ?qd=T", simp_all)
+ from trans [OF pq_ex cp_thm'[OF lq uq dd dp,where i="i"]] B
+ have "?lhs = (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq \<or> (\<exists> b\<in> ?N ` set ?B. Ifm bbs ((b+ j)#bs) ?q))" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq \<or> (\<exists> b\<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N b+ j)#bs) ?q))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq ) \<or> (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. \<exists> b\<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N (Add b (C j)))#bs) ?q))" by (simp only: Inum.simps) blast
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?smq ) \<or> (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. \<exists> b\<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N (Add b (C j)))#bs) ?q))" by (simp add: simpfm)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. (\<lambda> j. ?I i (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))) j) \<or> (\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. \<exists> b\<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N (Add b (C j)))#bs) ?q))"
+ by (simp only: simpfm subst0_I[OF qfmq] iupt_set) auto
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I i (evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js) \<or> (\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. \<exists> b\<in> set ?B. ?I i (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)))"
+ by (simp only: evaldjf_ex subst0_I[OF qfq])
+ also have "\<dots>= (?I i ?md \<or> (\<exists> (b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. (\<lambda> (b,j). ?I i (simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q))) (b,j)))"
+ by (simp only: simpfm set_concat set_map concat_map_singleton UN_simps) blast
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I i ?md \<or> (?I i (evaldjf (\<lambda> (b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)) ?Bjs)))"
+ by (simp only: evaldjf_ex[where bs="i#bs" and f="\<lambda> (b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)" and ps="?Bjs"]) (auto simp add: split_def)
+ finally have mdqd: "?lhs = (?I i ?md \<or> ?I i ?qd)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I i (disj ?md ?qd))" by (simp add: disj)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm bbs bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd)))" by (simp only: decr [OF mdqdb])
+ finally have mdqd2: "?lhs = (Ifm bbs bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd)))" .
+ {assume mdT: "?md = T"
+ hence cT:"cooper p = T"
+ by (simp only: cooper_def unit_def split_def Let_def if_True) simp
+ from mdT have lhs:"?lhs" using mdqd by simp
+ from mdT have "?rhs" by (simp add: cooper_def unit_def split_def)
+ with lhs cT have ?thesis by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume mdT: "?md \<noteq> T" hence "cooper p = decr (disj ?md ?qd)"
+ by (simp only: cooper_def unit_def split_def Let_def if_False)
+ with mdqd2 decr_qf[OF mdqdb] have ?thesis by simp }
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+definition pa :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "pa p = qelim (prep p) cooper"
+
+theorem mirqe: "(Ifm bbs bs (pa p) = Ifm bbs bs p) \<and> qfree (pa p)"
+ using qelim_ci cooper prep by (auto simp add: pa_def)
+
+definition
+ cooper_test :: "unit \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "cooper_test u = pa (E (A (Imp (Ge (Sub (Bound 0) (Bound 1)))
+ (E (E (Eq (Sub (Add (Mul 3 (Bound 1)) (Mul 5 (Bound 0)))
+ (Bound 2))))))))"
+
+ML {* @{code cooper_test} () *}
+
+(*
+code_reserved SML oo
+export_code pa in SML module_name GeneratedCooper file "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/raw_generated_cooper.ML"
+*)
+
+oracle linzqe_oracle = {*
+let
+
+fun num_of_term vs (t as Free (xn, xT)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) vs t
+ of NONE => error "Variable not found in the list!"
+ | SOME n => @{code Bound} n)
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "0::int"} = @{code C} 0
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "1::int"} = @{code C} 1
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "number_of :: int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t) = @{code C} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t)
+ | num_of_term vs (Bound i) = @{code Bound} i
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "uminus :: int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t') = @{code Neg} (num_of_term vs t')
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op + :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Add} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op - :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op * :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ (case try HOLogic.dest_number t1
+ of SOME (_, i) => @{code Mul} (i, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | NONE => (case try HOLogic.dest_number t2
+ of SOME (_, i) => @{code Mul} (i, num_of_term vs t1)
+ | NONE => error "num_of_term: unsupported multiplication"))
+ | num_of_term vs t = error ("num_of_term: unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term @{context} t);
+
+fun fm_of_term ps vs @{term True} = @{code T}
+ | fm_of_term ps vs @{term False} = @{code F}
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op < :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Lt} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op \<le> :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Le} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op = :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Eq} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op dvd :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ (case try HOLogic.dest_number t1
+ of SOME (_, i) => @{code Dvd} (i, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | NONE => error "num_of_term: unsupported dvd")
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op = :: bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Iff} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op &"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code And} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op |"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Or} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "op -->"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Imp} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (@{term "Not"} $ t') =
+ @{code NOT} (fm_of_term ps vs t')
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (Const ("Ex", _) $ Abs (xn, xT, p)) =
+ let
+ val (xn', p') = variant_abs (xn, xT, p);
+ val vs' = (Free (xn', xT), 0) :: map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs;
+ in @{code E} (fm_of_term ps vs' p) end
+ | fm_of_term ps vs (Const ("All", _) $ Abs (xn, xT, p)) =
+ let
+ val (xn', p') = variant_abs (xn, xT, p);
+ val vs' = (Free (xn', xT), 0) :: map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs;
+ in @{code A} (fm_of_term ps vs' p) end
+ | fm_of_term ps vs t = error ("fm_of_term : unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term @{context} t);
+
+fun term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) = HOLogic.mk_number HOLogic.intT i
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Bound} n) = fst (the (find_first (fn (_, m) => n = m) vs))
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Neg} t') = @{term "uminus :: int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ term_of_num vs t'
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op + :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"} $
+ term_of_num vs t1 $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Sub} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op - :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"} $
+ term_of_num vs t1 $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Mul} (i, t2)) = @{term "op * :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"} $
+ term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code CN} (n, i, t)) = term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (@{code Mul} (i, @{code Bound} n), t));
+
+fun term_of_fm ps vs @{code T} = HOLogic.true_const
+ | term_of_fm ps vs @{code F} = HOLogic.false_const
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Lt} t) =
+ @{term "op < :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::int"}
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Le} t) =
+ @{term "op \<le> :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::int"}
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Gt} t) =
+ @{term "op < :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ @{term "0::int"} $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Ge} t) =
+ @{term "op \<le> :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ @{term "0::int"} $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Eq} t) =
+ @{term "op = :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::int"}
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NEq} t) =
+ term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NOT} (@{code Eq} t))
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Dvd} (i, t)) =
+ @{term "op dvd :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NDvd} (i, t)) =
+ term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NOT} (@{code Dvd} (i, t)))
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NOT} t') =
+ HOLogic.Not $ term_of_fm ps vs t'
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code And} (t1, t2)) =
+ HOLogic.conj $ term_of_fm ps vs t1 $ term_of_fm ps vs t2
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Or} (t1, t2)) =
+ HOLogic.disj $ term_of_fm ps vs t1 $ term_of_fm ps vs t2
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Imp} (t1, t2)) =
+ HOLogic.imp $ term_of_fm ps vs t1 $ term_of_fm ps vs t2
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Iff} (t1, t2)) =
+ @{term "op = :: bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_fm ps vs t1 $ term_of_fm ps vs t2
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Closed} n) = (fst o the) (find_first (fn (_, m) => m = n) ps)
+ | term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NClosed} n) = term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NOT} (@{code Closed} n));
+
+fun term_bools acc t =
+ let
+ val is_op = member (op =) [@{term "op &"}, @{term "op |"}, @{term "op -->"}, @{term "op = :: bool => _"},
+ @{term "op = :: int => _"}, @{term "op < :: int => _"},
+ @{term "op <= :: int => _"}, @{term "Not"}, @{term "All :: (int => _) => _"},
+ @{term "Ex :: (int => _) => _"}, @{term "True"}, @{term "False"}]
+ fun is_ty t = not (fastype_of t = HOLogic.boolT)
+ in case t
+ of (l as f $ a) $ b => if is_ty t orelse is_op t then term_bools (term_bools acc l)b
+ else insert (op aconv) t acc
+ | f $ a => if is_ty t orelse is_op t then term_bools (term_bools acc f) a
+ else insert (op aconv) t acc
+ | Abs p => term_bools acc (snd (variant_abs p))
+ | _ => if is_ty t orelse is_op t then acc else insert (op aconv) t acc
+ end;
+
+in fn ct =>
+ let
+ val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct;
+ val t = Thm.term_of ct;
+ val fs = OldTerm.term_frees t;
+ val bs = term_bools [] t;
+ val vs = fs ~~ (0 upto (length fs - 1))
+ val ps = bs ~~ (0 upto (length bs - 1))
+ val t' = (term_of_fm ps vs o @{code pa} o fm_of_term ps vs) t;
+ in (Thm.cterm_of thy o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (t, t') end
+end;
+*}
+
+use "cooper_tac.ML"
+setup "Cooper_Tac.setup"
+
+text {* Tests *}
+
+lemma "\<exists> (j::int). \<forall> x\<ge>j. (\<exists> a b. x = 3*a+5*b)"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL (x::int) >=8. EX i j. 5*i + 3*j = x"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "(\<forall>(y::int). 3 dvd y) ==> \<forall>(x::int). b < x --> a \<le> x"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "!! (y::int) (z::int) (n::int). 3 dvd z ==> 2 dvd (y::int) ==>
+ (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) & (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "!! (y::int) (z::int) n. Suc(n::nat) < 6 ==> 3 dvd z ==>
+ 2 dvd (y::int) ==> (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) & (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::nat). \<exists>(y::nat). (0::nat) \<le> 5 --> y = 5 + x "
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL (x::int) >=8. EX i j. 5*i + 3*j = x"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL (y::int) (z::int) (n::int). 3 dvd z --> 2 dvd (y::int) --> (EX (x::int). 2*x = y) & (EX (k::int). 3*k = z)"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL(x::int) y. x < y --> 2 * x + 1 < 2 * y"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL(x::int) y. 2 * x + 1 ~= 2 * y"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "EX(x::int) y. 0 < x & 0 <= y & 3 * x - 5 * y = 1"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "~ (EX(x::int) (y::int) (z::int). 4*x + (-6::int)*y = 1)"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL(x::int). (2 dvd x) --> (EX(y::int). x = 2*y)"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL(x::int). (2 dvd x) = (EX(y::int). x = 2*y)"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "ALL(x::int). ((2 dvd x) = (ALL(y::int). x ~= 2*y + 1))"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "~ (ALL(x::int). ((2 dvd x) = (ALL(y::int). x ~= 2*y+1) | (EX(q::int) (u::int) i. 3*i + 2*q - u < 17) --> 0 < x | ((~ 3 dvd x) &(x + 8 = 0))))"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "~ (ALL(i::int). 4 <= i --> (EX x y. 0 <= x & 0 <= y & 3 * x + 5 * y = i))"
+ by cooper
+
+lemma "EX j. ALL (x::int) >= j. EX i j. 5*i + 3*j = x"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "(\<forall>(y::int). 3 dvd y) ==> \<forall>(x::int). b < x --> a \<le> x"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "!! (y::int) (z::int) (n::int). 3 dvd z ==> 2 dvd (y::int) ==>
+ (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) & (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "!! (y::int) (z::int) n. Suc(n::nat) < 6 ==> 3 dvd z ==>
+ 2 dvd (y::int) ==> (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) & (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::nat). \<exists>(y::nat). (0::nat) \<le> 5 --> y = 5 + x "
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::nat). \<exists>(y::nat). y = 5 + x | x div 6 + 1= 2"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<exists>(x::int). 0 < x"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::int) y. x < y --> 2 * x + 1 < 2 * y"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::int) y. 2 * x + 1 \<noteq> 2 * y"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<exists>(x::int) y. 0 < x & 0 \<le> y & 3 * x - 5 * y = 1"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "~ (\<exists>(x::int) (y::int) (z::int). 4*x + (-6::int)*y = 1)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "~ (\<exists>(x::int). False)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::int). (2 dvd x) --> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::int). (2 dvd x) --> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::int). (2 dvd x) = (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(x::int). ((2 dvd x) = (\<forall>(y::int). x \<noteq> 2*y + 1))"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "~ (\<forall>(x::int).
+ ((2 dvd x) = (\<forall>(y::int). x \<noteq> 2*y+1) |
+ (\<exists>(q::int) (u::int) i. 3*i + 2*q - u < 17)
+ --> 0 < x | ((~ 3 dvd x) &(x + 8 = 0))))"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "~ (\<forall>(i::int). 4 \<le> i --> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x & 0 \<le> y & 3 * x + 5 * y = i))"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<forall>(i::int). 8 \<le> i --> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x & 0 \<le> y & 3 * x + 5 * y = i)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "\<exists>(j::int). \<forall>i. j \<le> i --> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x & 0 \<le> y & 3 * x + 5 * y = i)"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "~ (\<forall>j (i::int). j \<le> i --> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x & 0 \<le> y & 3 * x + 5 * y = i))"
+ by cooper
+
+theorem "(\<exists>m::nat. n = 2 * m) --> (n + 1) div 2 = n div 2"
+ by cooper
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,879 @@
+(* Title : HOL/Dense_Linear_Order.thy
+ Author : Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
+*)
+
+header {* Dense linear order without endpoints
+ and a quantifier elimination procedure in Ferrante and Rackoff style *}
+
+theory Dense_Linear_Order
+imports Plain Groebner_Basis Main
+uses
+ "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/langford_data.ML"
+ "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/ferrante_rackoff_data.ML"
+ ("~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/langford.ML")
+ ("~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/ferrante_rackoff.ML")
+begin
+
+setup {* Langford_Data.setup #> Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.setup *}
+
+context linorder
+begin
+
+lemma less_not_permute[noatp]: "\<not> (x < y \<and> y < x)" by (simp add: not_less linear)
+
+lemma gather_simps[noatp]:
+ shows
+ "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> x < u \<and> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> (insert u U). x < y) \<and> P x)"
+ and "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> l < x \<and> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> (insert l L). y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> P x)"
+ "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> x < u) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> (insert u U). x < y))"
+ and "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> l < x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> (insert l L). y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y))" by auto
+
+lemma
+ gather_start[noatp]: "(\<exists>x. P x) \<equiv> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> {}. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in> {}. x < y) \<and> P x)"
+ by simp
+
+text{* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>-\<infinity>\<^esub>)"}*}
+lemma minf_lt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x < t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
+lemma minf_gt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (t < x \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
+ by (simp add: not_less) (rule exI[where x="t"], auto simp add: less_le)
+
+lemma minf_le[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by (auto simp add: less_le)
+lemma minf_ge[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (t \<le> x \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
+ by (auto simp add: less_le not_less not_le)
+lemma minf_eq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x = t \<longleftrightarrow> False)" by auto
+lemma minf_neq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
+lemma minf_P[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P \<longleftrightarrow> P)" by blast
+
+text{* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>+\<infinity>\<^esub>)"}*}
+lemma pinf_gt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (t < x \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
+lemma pinf_lt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x < t \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
+ by (simp add: not_less) (rule exI[where x="t"], auto simp add: less_le)
+
+lemma pinf_ge[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (t \<le> x \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by (auto simp add: less_le)
+lemma pinf_le[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
+ by (auto simp add: less_le not_less not_le)
+lemma pinf_eq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x = t \<longleftrightarrow> False)" by auto
+lemma pinf_neq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
+lemma pinf_P[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (P \<longleftrightarrow> P)" by blast
+
+lemma nmi_lt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x < t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_gt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> t < x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)"
+ by (auto simp add: le_less)
+lemma nmi_le[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x\<le> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_ge[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> t\<le> x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_eq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x = t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_neq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow>\<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x \<noteq> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_P[noatp]: "\<forall> x. ~P \<and> P \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_conj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x) ;
+ \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
+ \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<and> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+lemma nmi_disj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x) ;
+ \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
+ \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<or> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
+
+lemma npi_lt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x < t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by (auto simp add: le_less)
+lemma npi_gt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> t < x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+lemma npi_le[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x \<le> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+lemma npi_ge[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> t \<le> x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+lemma npi_eq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x = t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+lemma npi_neq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x \<noteq> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u )" by auto
+lemma npi_P[noatp]: "\<forall> x. ~P \<and> P \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+lemma npi_conj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u) ; \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<and> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+lemma npi_disj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u) ; \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<or> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
+
+lemma lin_dense_lt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x < t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y < t)"
+proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x l u y assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x"
+ and xu: "x<u" and px: "x < t" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
+ from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
+ {assume H: "t < y"
+ from less_trans[OF lx px] less_trans[OF H yu]
+ have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
+ with tU noU have "False" by auto}
+ hence "\<not> t < y" by auto hence "y \<le> t" by (simp add: not_less)
+ thus "y < t" using tny by (simp add: less_le)
+qed
+
+lemma lin_dense_gt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l < x \<and> x < u \<and> t < x \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> t < y)"
+proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x l u y
+ assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x" and xu: "x<u"
+ and px: "t < x" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
+ from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
+ {assume H: "y< t"
+ from less_trans[OF ly H] less_trans[OF px xu] have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
+ with tU noU have "False" by auto}
+ hence "\<not> y<t" by auto hence "t \<le> y" by (auto simp add: not_less)
+ thus "t < y" using tny by (simp add:less_le)
+qed
+
+lemma lin_dense_le[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x \<le> t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y\<le> t)"
+proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x l u y
+ assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x" and xu: "x<u"
+ and px: "x \<le> t" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
+ from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
+ {assume H: "t < y"
+ from less_le_trans[OF lx px] less_trans[OF H yu]
+ have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
+ with tU noU have "False" by auto}
+ hence "\<not> t < y" by auto thus "y \<le> t" by (simp add: not_less)
+qed
+
+lemma lin_dense_ge[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> t \<le> x \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> t \<le> y)"
+proof(clarsimp)
+ fix x l u y
+ assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x" and xu: "x<u"
+ and px: "t \<le> x" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
+ from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
+ {assume H: "y< t"
+ from less_trans[OF ly H] le_less_trans[OF px xu]
+ have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
+ with tU noU have "False" by auto}
+ hence "\<not> y<t" by auto thus "t \<le> y" by (simp add: not_less)
+qed
+lemma lin_dense_eq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x = t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y= t)" by auto
+lemma lin_dense_neq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x \<noteq> t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y\<noteq> t)" by auto
+lemma lin_dense_P[noatp]: "\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P)" by auto
+
+lemma lin_dense_conj[noatp]:
+ "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P1 x
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P1 y) ;
+ \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P2 x
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P2 y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
+ \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> (P1 x \<and> P2 x)
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> (P1 y \<and> P2 y))"
+ by blast
+lemma lin_dense_disj[noatp]:
+ "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P1 x
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P1 y) ;
+ \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P2 x
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P2 y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
+ \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> (P1 x \<or> P2 x)
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> (P1 y \<or> P2 y))"
+ by blast
+
+lemma npmibnd[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x); \<forall>x. \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)\<rbrakk>
+ \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<le> x \<and> x \<le> u')"
+by auto
+
+lemma finite_set_intervals[noatp]:
+ assumes px: "P x" and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u" and linS: "l\<in> S"
+ and uinS: "u \<in> S" and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
+ shows "\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x"
+proof-
+ let ?Mx = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> y \<le> x}"
+ let ?xM = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> x \<le> y}"
+ let ?a = "Max ?Mx"
+ let ?b = "Min ?xM"
+ have MxS: "?Mx \<subseteq> S" by blast
+ hence fMx: "finite ?Mx" using fS finite_subset by auto
+ from lx linS have linMx: "l \<in> ?Mx" by blast
+ hence Mxne: "?Mx \<noteq> {}" by blast
+ have xMS: "?xM \<subseteq> S" by blast
+ hence fxM: "finite ?xM" using fS finite_subset by auto
+ from xu uinS have linxM: "u \<in> ?xM" by blast
+ hence xMne: "?xM \<noteq> {}" by blast
+ have ax:"?a \<le> x" using Mxne fMx by auto
+ have xb:"x \<le> ?b" using xMne fxM by auto
+ have "?a \<in> ?Mx" using Max_in[OF fMx Mxne] by simp hence ainS: "?a \<in> S" using MxS by blast
+ have "?b \<in> ?xM" using Min_in[OF fxM xMne] by simp hence binS: "?b \<in> S" using xMS by blast
+ have noy:"\<forall> y. ?a < y \<and> y < ?b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix y assume ay: "?a < y" and yb: "y < ?b" and yS: "y \<in> S"
+ from yS have "y\<in> ?Mx \<or> y\<in> ?xM" by (auto simp add: linear)
+ moreover {assume "y \<in> ?Mx" hence "y \<le> ?a" using Mxne fMx by auto with ay have "False" by (simp add: not_le[symmetric])}
+ moreover {assume "y \<in> ?xM" hence "?b \<le> y" using xMne fxM by auto with yb have "False" by (simp add: not_le[symmetric])}
+ ultimately show "False" by blast
+ qed
+ from ainS binS noy ax xb px show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma finite_set_intervals2[noatp]:
+ assumes px: "P x" and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u" and linS: "l\<in> S"
+ and uinS: "u \<in> S" and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
+ shows "(\<exists> s\<in> S. P s) \<or> (\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a < x \<and> x < b \<and> P x)"
+proof-
+ from finite_set_intervals[where P="P", OF px lx xu linS uinS fS lS Su]
+ obtain a and b where
+ as: "a\<in> S" and bs: "b\<in> S" and noS:"\<forall>y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S"
+ and axb: "a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x" by auto
+ from axb have "x= a \<or> x= b \<or> (a < x \<and> x < b)" by (auto simp add: le_less)
+ thus ?thesis using px as bs noS by blast
+qed
+
+end
+
+section {* The classical QE after Langford for dense linear orders *}
+
+context dense_linear_order
+begin
+
+lemma interval_empty_iff:
+ "{y. x < y \<and> y < z} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> x < z"
+ by (auto dest: dense)
+
+lemma dlo_qe_bnds[noatp]:
+ assumes ne: "L \<noteq> {}" and neU: "U \<noteq> {}" and fL: "finite L" and fU: "finite U"
+ shows "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y)) \<equiv> (\<forall> l \<in> L. \<forall>u \<in> U. l < u)"
+proof (simp only: atomize_eq, rule iffI)
+ assume H: "\<exists>x. (\<forall>y\<in>L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>U. x < y)"
+ then obtain x where xL: "\<forall>y\<in>L. y < x" and xU: "\<forall>y\<in>U. x < y" by blast
+ {fix l u assume l: "l \<in> L" and u: "u \<in> U"
+ have "l < x" using xL l by blast
+ also have "x < u" using xU u by blast
+ finally (less_trans) have "l < u" .}
+ thus "\<forall>l\<in>L. \<forall>u\<in>U. l < u" by blast
+next
+ assume H: "\<forall>l\<in>L. \<forall>u\<in>U. l < u"
+ let ?ML = "Max L"
+ let ?MU = "Min U"
+ from fL ne have th1: "?ML \<in> L" and th1': "\<forall>l\<in>L. l \<le> ?ML" by auto
+ from fU neU have th2: "?MU \<in> U" and th2': "\<forall>u\<in>U. ?MU \<le> u" by auto
+ from th1 th2 H have "?ML < ?MU" by auto
+ with dense obtain w where th3: "?ML < w" and th4: "w < ?MU" by blast
+ from th3 th1' have "\<forall>l \<in> L. l < w" by auto
+ moreover from th4 th2' have "\<forall>u \<in> U. w < u" by auto
+ ultimately show "\<exists>x. (\<forall>y\<in>L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>U. x < y)" by auto
+qed
+
+lemma dlo_qe_noub[noatp]:
+ assumes ne: "L \<noteq> {}" and fL: "finite L"
+ shows "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> {}. x < y)) \<equiv> True"
+proof(simp add: atomize_eq)
+ from gt_ex[of "Max L"] obtain M where M: "Max L < M" by blast
+ from ne fL have "\<forall>x \<in> L. x \<le> Max L" by simp
+ with M have "\<forall>x\<in>L. x < M" by (auto intro: le_less_trans)
+ thus "\<exists>x. \<forall>y\<in>L. y < x" by blast
+qed
+
+lemma dlo_qe_nolb[noatp]:
+ assumes ne: "U \<noteq> {}" and fU: "finite U"
+ shows "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> {}. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y)) \<equiv> True"
+proof(simp add: atomize_eq)
+ from lt_ex[of "Min U"] obtain M where M: "M < Min U" by blast
+ from ne fU have "\<forall>x \<in> U. Min U \<le> x" by simp
+ with M have "\<forall>x\<in>U. M < x" by (auto intro: less_le_trans)
+ thus "\<exists>x. \<forall>y\<in>U. x < y" by blast
+qed
+
+lemma exists_neq[noatp]: "\<exists>(x::'a). x \<noteq> t" "\<exists>(x::'a). t \<noteq> x"
+ using gt_ex[of t] by auto
+
+lemmas dlo_simps[noatp] = order_refl less_irrefl not_less not_le exists_neq
+ le_less neq_iff linear less_not_permute
+
+lemma axiom[noatp]: "dense_linear_order (op \<le>) (op <)" by (rule dense_linear_order_axioms)
+lemma atoms[noatp]:
+ shows "TERM (less :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
+ and "TERM (less_eq :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
+ and "TERM (op = :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)" .
+
+declare axiom[langford qe: dlo_qe_bnds dlo_qe_nolb dlo_qe_noub gather: gather_start gather_simps atoms: atoms]
+declare dlo_simps[langfordsimp]
+
+end
+
+(* FIXME: Move to HOL -- together with the conj_aci_rule in langford.ML *)
+lemma dnf[noatp]:
+ "(P & (Q | R)) = ((P&Q) | (P&R))"
+ "((Q | R) & P) = ((Q&P) | (R&P))"
+ by blast+
+
+lemmas weak_dnf_simps[noatp] = simp_thms dnf
+
+lemma nnf_simps[noatp]:
+ "(\<not>(P \<and> Q)) = (\<not>P \<or> \<not>Q)" "(\<not>(P \<or> Q)) = (\<not>P \<and> \<not>Q)" "(P \<longrightarrow> Q) = (\<not>P \<or> Q)"
+ "(P = Q) = ((P \<and> Q) \<or> (\<not>P \<and> \<not> Q))" "(\<not> \<not>(P)) = P"
+ by blast+
+
+lemma ex_distrib[noatp]: "(\<exists>x. P x \<or> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> ((\<exists>x. P x) \<or> (\<exists>x. Q x))" by blast
+
+lemmas dnf_simps[noatp] = weak_dnf_simps nnf_simps ex_distrib
+
+use "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/langford.ML"
+method_setup dlo = {*
+ Method.ctxt_args (Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' o LangfordQE.dlo_tac)
+*} "Langford's algorithm for quantifier elimination in dense linear orders"
+
+
+section {* Contructive dense linear orders yield QE for linear arithmetic over ordered Fields -- see @{text "Arith_Tools.thy"} *}
+
+text {* Linear order without upper bounds *}
+
+locale linorder_stupid_syntax = linorder
+begin
+notation
+ less_eq ("op \<sqsubseteq>") and
+ less_eq ("(_/ \<sqsubseteq> _)" [51, 51] 50) and
+ less ("op \<sqsubset>") and
+ less ("(_/ \<sqsubset> _)" [51, 51] 50)
+
+end
+
+locale linorder_no_ub = linorder_stupid_syntax +
+ assumes gt_ex: "\<exists>y. less x y"
+begin
+lemma ge_ex[noatp]: "\<exists>y. x \<sqsubseteq> y" using gt_ex by auto
+
+text {* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>+\<infinity>\<^esub>)"} *}
+lemma pinf_conj[noatp]:
+ assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
+ and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
+ shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2'))"
+proof-
+ from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
+ and z2: "\<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
+ from gt_ex obtain z where z:"ord.max less_eq z1 z2 \<sqsubset> z" by blast
+ from z have zz1: "z1 \<sqsubset> z" and zz2: "z2 \<sqsubset> z" by simp_all
+ {fix x assume H: "z \<sqsubset> x"
+ from less_trans[OF zz1 H] less_trans[OF zz2 H]
+ have "(P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
+ }
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma pinf_disj[noatp]:
+ assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
+ and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
+ shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2'))"
+proof-
+ from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
+ and z2: "\<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
+ from gt_ex obtain z where z:"ord.max less_eq z1 z2 \<sqsubset> z" by blast
+ from z have zz1: "z1 \<sqsubset> z" and zz2: "z2 \<sqsubset> z" by simp_all
+ {fix x assume H: "z \<sqsubset> x"
+ from less_trans[OF zz1 H] less_trans[OF zz2 H]
+ have "(P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
+ }
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma pinf_ex[noatp]: assumes ex:"\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" and p1: P1 shows "\<exists> x. P x"
+proof-
+ from ex obtain z where z: "\<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" by blast
+ from gt_ex obtain x where x: "z \<sqsubset> x" by blast
+ from z x p1 show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+end
+
+text {* Linear order without upper bounds *}
+
+locale linorder_no_lb = linorder_stupid_syntax +
+ assumes lt_ex: "\<exists>y. less y x"
+begin
+lemma le_ex[noatp]: "\<exists>y. y \<sqsubseteq> x" using lt_ex by auto
+
+
+text {* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>-\<infinity>\<^esub>)"} *}
+lemma minf_conj[noatp]:
+ assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
+ and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
+ shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2'))"
+proof-
+ from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"and z2: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
+ from lt_ex obtain z where z:"z \<sqsubset> ord.min less_eq z1 z2" by blast
+ from z have zz1: "z \<sqsubset> z1" and zz2: "z \<sqsubset> z2" by simp_all
+ {fix x assume H: "x \<sqsubset> z"
+ from less_trans[OF H zz1] less_trans[OF H zz2]
+ have "(P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
+ }
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma minf_disj[noatp]:
+ assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
+ and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
+ shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2'))"
+proof-
+ from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"and z2: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
+ from lt_ex obtain z where z:"z \<sqsubset> ord.min less_eq z1 z2" by blast
+ from z have zz1: "z \<sqsubset> z1" and zz2: "z \<sqsubset> z2" by simp_all
+ {fix x assume H: "x \<sqsubset> z"
+ from less_trans[OF H zz1] less_trans[OF H zz2]
+ have "(P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
+ }
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma minf_ex[noatp]: assumes ex:"\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" and p1: P1 shows "\<exists> x. P x"
+proof-
+ from ex obtain z where z: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" by blast
+ from lt_ex obtain x where x: "x \<sqsubset> z" by blast
+ from z x p1 show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+end
+
+
+locale constr_dense_linear_order = linorder_no_lb + linorder_no_ub +
+ fixes between
+ assumes between_less: "less x y \<Longrightarrow> less x (between x y) \<and> less (between x y) y"
+ and between_same: "between x x = x"
+
+sublocale constr_dense_linear_order < dense_linear_order
+ apply unfold_locales
+ using gt_ex lt_ex between_less
+ by (auto, rule_tac x="between x y" in exI, simp)
+
+context constr_dense_linear_order
+begin
+
+lemma rinf_U[noatp]:
+ assumes fU: "finite U"
+ and lin_dense: "\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l \<sqsubset> t \<and> t\<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l\<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> u \<and> P x
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> P y )"
+ and nmpiU: "\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x \<and> x \<sqsubseteq> u')"
+ and nmi: "\<not> MP" and npi: "\<not> PP" and ex: "\<exists> x. P x"
+ shows "\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. P (between u u')"
+proof-
+ from ex obtain x where px: "P x" by blast
+ from px nmi npi nmpiU have "\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x \<and> x \<sqsubseteq> u'" by auto
+ then obtain u and u' where uU:"u\<in> U" and uU': "u' \<in> U" and ux:"u \<sqsubseteq> x" and xu':"x \<sqsubseteq> u'" by auto
+ from uU have Une: "U \<noteq> {}" by auto
+ term "linorder.Min less_eq"
+ let ?l = "linorder.Min less_eq U"
+ let ?u = "linorder.Max less_eq U"
+ have linM: "?l \<in> U" using fU Une by simp
+ have uinM: "?u \<in> U" using fU Une by simp
+ have lM: "\<forall> t\<in> U. ?l \<sqsubseteq> t" using Une fU by auto
+ have Mu: "\<forall> t\<in> U. t \<sqsubseteq> ?u" using Une fU by auto
+ have th:"?l \<sqsubseteq> u" using uU Une lM by auto
+ from order_trans[OF th ux] have lx: "?l \<sqsubseteq> x" .
+ have th: "u' \<sqsubseteq> ?u" using uU' Une Mu by simp
+ from order_trans[OF xu' th] have xu: "x \<sqsubseteq> ?u" .
+ from finite_set_intervals2[where P="P",OF px lx xu linM uinM fU lM Mu]
+ have "(\<exists> s\<in> U. P s) \<or>
+ (\<exists> t1\<in> U. \<exists> t2 \<in> U. (\<forall> y. t1 \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> U) \<and> t1 \<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> t2 \<and> P x)" .
+ moreover { fix u assume um: "u\<in>U" and pu: "P u"
+ have "between u u = u" by (simp add: between_same)
+ with um pu have "P (between u u)" by simp
+ with um have ?thesis by blast}
+ moreover{
+ assume "\<exists> t1\<in> U. \<exists> t2 \<in> U. (\<forall> y. t1 \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> U) \<and> t1 \<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> t2 \<and> P x"
+ then obtain t1 and t2 where t1M: "t1 \<in> U" and t2M: "t2\<in> U"
+ and noM: "\<forall> y. t1 \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> U" and t1x: "t1 \<sqsubset> x" and xt2: "x \<sqsubset> t2" and px: "P x"
+ by blast
+ from less_trans[OF t1x xt2] have t1t2: "t1 \<sqsubset> t2" .
+ let ?u = "between t1 t2"
+ from between_less t1t2 have t1lu: "t1 \<sqsubset> ?u" and ut2: "?u \<sqsubset> t2" by auto
+ from lin_dense noM t1x xt2 px t1lu ut2 have "P ?u" by blast
+ with t1M t2M have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+
+theorem fr_eq[noatp]:
+ assumes fU: "finite U"
+ and lin_dense: "\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l \<sqsubset> t \<and> t\<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l\<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> u \<and> P x
+ \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> P y )"
+ and nmibnd: "\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x)"
+ and npibnd: "\<forall>x. \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<sqsubseteq> u)"
+ and mi: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x = MP)" and pi: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x = PP)"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. P x) \<equiv> (MP \<or> PP \<or> (\<exists> u \<in> U. \<exists> u'\<in> U. P (between u u')))"
+ (is "_ \<equiv> (_ \<or> _ \<or> ?F)" is "?E \<equiv> ?D")
+proof-
+ {
+ assume px: "\<exists> x. P x"
+ have "MP \<or> PP \<or> (\<not> MP \<and> \<not> PP)" by blast
+ moreover {assume "MP \<or> PP" hence "?D" by blast}
+ moreover {assume nmi: "\<not> MP" and npi: "\<not> PP"
+ from npmibnd[OF nmibnd npibnd]
+ have nmpiU: "\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x \<and> x \<sqsubseteq> u')" .
+ from rinf_U[OF fU lin_dense nmpiU nmi npi px] have "?D" by blast}
+ ultimately have "?D" by blast}
+ moreover
+ { assume "?D"
+ moreover {assume m:"MP" from minf_ex[OF mi m] have "?E" .}
+ moreover {assume p: "PP" from pinf_ex[OF pi p] have "?E" . }
+ moreover {assume f:"?F" hence "?E" by blast}
+ ultimately have "?E" by blast}
+ ultimately have "?E = ?D" by blast thus "?E \<equiv> ?D" by simp
+qed
+
+lemmas minf_thms[noatp] = minf_conj minf_disj minf_eq minf_neq minf_lt minf_le minf_gt minf_ge minf_P
+lemmas pinf_thms[noatp] = pinf_conj pinf_disj pinf_eq pinf_neq pinf_lt pinf_le pinf_gt pinf_ge pinf_P
+
+lemmas nmi_thms[noatp] = nmi_conj nmi_disj nmi_eq nmi_neq nmi_lt nmi_le nmi_gt nmi_ge nmi_P
+lemmas npi_thms[noatp] = npi_conj npi_disj npi_eq npi_neq npi_lt npi_le npi_gt npi_ge npi_P
+lemmas lin_dense_thms[noatp] = lin_dense_conj lin_dense_disj lin_dense_eq lin_dense_neq lin_dense_lt lin_dense_le lin_dense_gt lin_dense_ge lin_dense_P
+
+lemma ferrack_axiom[noatp]: "constr_dense_linear_order less_eq less between"
+ by (rule constr_dense_linear_order_axioms)
+lemma atoms[noatp]:
+ shows "TERM (less :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
+ and "TERM (less_eq :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
+ and "TERM (op = :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)" .
+
+declare ferrack_axiom [ferrack minf: minf_thms pinf: pinf_thms
+ nmi: nmi_thms npi: npi_thms lindense:
+ lin_dense_thms qe: fr_eq atoms: atoms]
+
+declaration {*
+let
+fun simps phi = map (Morphism.thm phi) [@{thm "not_less"}, @{thm "not_le"}]
+fun generic_whatis phi =
+ let
+ val [lt, le] = map (Morphism.term phi) [@{term "op \<sqsubset>"}, @{term "op \<sqsubseteq>"}]
+ fun h x t =
+ case term_of t of
+ Const("op =", _)$y$z => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | @{term "Not"}$(Const("op =", _)$y$z) => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | b$y$z => if Term.could_unify (b, lt) then
+ if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
+ else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ else if Term.could_unify (b, le) then
+ if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
+ else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | _ => Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ in h end
+ fun ss phi = HOL_ss addsimps (simps phi)
+in
+ Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.funs @{thm "ferrack_axiom"}
+ {isolate_conv = K (K (K Thm.reflexive)), whatis = generic_whatis, simpset = ss}
+end
+*}
+
+end
+
+use "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/ferrante_rackoff.ML"
+
+method_setup ferrack = {*
+ Method.ctxt_args (Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' o FerranteRackoff.dlo_tac)
+*} "Ferrante and Rackoff's algorithm for quantifier elimination in dense linear orders"
+
+subsection {* Ferrante and Rackoff algorithm over ordered fields *}
+
+lemma neg_prod_lt:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x < 0) == (x > 0))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c < 0"
+ have "c*x < 0 = (0/c < x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_less_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (0 < x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x < 0) == (x > 0)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma pos_prod_lt:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x < 0) == (x < 0))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c > 0"
+ hence "c*x < 0 = (0/c > x)" by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (0 > x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x < 0) == (x < 0)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma neg_prod_sum_lt: "(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t< 0) == (x > (- 1/c)*t))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c < 0"
+ have "c*x + t< 0 = (c*x < -t)" by (subst less_iff_diff_less_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
+ also have "\<dots> = (-t/c < x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_less_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t < x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x + t < 0) == (x > (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma pos_prod_sum_lt:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t < 0) == (x < (- 1/c)*t))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c > 0"
+ have "c*x + t< 0 = (c*x < -t)" by (subst less_iff_diff_less_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
+ also have "\<dots> = (-t/c > x)" by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t > x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x + t < 0) == (x < (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma sum_lt:"((x::'a::pordered_ab_group_add) + t < 0) == (x < - t)"
+ using less_diff_eq[where a= x and b=t and c=0] by simp
+
+lemma neg_prod_le:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x <= 0) == (x >= 0))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c < 0"
+ have "c*x <= 0 = (0/c <= x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_le_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (0 <= x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x <= 0) == (x >= 0)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma pos_prod_le:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x <= 0) == (x <= 0))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c > 0"
+ hence "c*x <= 0 = (0/c >= x)" by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (0 >= x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x <= 0) == (x <= 0)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma neg_prod_sum_le: "(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t <= 0) == (x >= (- 1/c)*t))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c < 0"
+ have "c*x + t <= 0 = (c*x <= -t)" by (subst le_iff_diff_le_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
+ also have "\<dots> = (-t/c <= x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_le_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t <= x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x + t <= 0) == (x >= (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma pos_prod_sum_le:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t <= 0) == (x <= (- 1/c)*t))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c > 0"
+ have "c*x + t <= 0 = (c*x <= -t)" by (subst le_iff_diff_le_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
+ also have "\<dots> = (-t/c >= x)" by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t >= x)" by simp
+ finally show "(c*x + t <= 0) == (x <= (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma sum_le:"((x::'a::pordered_ab_group_add) + t <= 0) == (x <= - t)"
+ using le_diff_eq[where a= x and b=t and c=0] by simp
+
+lemma nz_prod_eq:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x = 0) == (x = 0))" by simp
+lemma nz_prod_sum_eq: "(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t = 0) == (x = (- 1/c)*t))"
+proof-
+ assume H: "c \<noteq> 0"
+ have "c*x + t = 0 = (c*x = -t)" by (subst eq_iff_diff_eq_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
+ also have "\<dots> = (x = -t/c)" by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
+ finally show "(c*x + t = 0) == (x = (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
+qed
+lemma sum_eq:"((x::'a::pordered_ab_group_add) + t = 0) == (x = - t)"
+ using eq_diff_eq[where a= x and b=t and c=0] by simp
+
+
+interpretation class_ordered_field_dense_linear_order!: constr_dense_linear_order
+ "op <=" "op <"
+ "\<lambda> x y. 1/2 * ((x::'a::{ordered_field,recpower,number_ring}) + y)"
+proof (unfold_locales, dlo, dlo, auto)
+ fix x y::'a assume lt: "x < y"
+ from less_half_sum[OF lt] show "x < (x + y) /2" by simp
+next
+ fix x y::'a assume lt: "x < y"
+ from gt_half_sum[OF lt] show "(x + y) /2 < y" by simp
+qed
+
+declaration{*
+let
+fun earlier [] x y = false
+ | earlier (h::t) x y =
+ if h aconvc y then false else if h aconvc x then true else earlier t x y;
+
+fun dest_frac ct = case term_of ct of
+ Const (@{const_name "HOL.divide"},_) $ a $ b=>
+ Rat.rat_of_quotient (snd (HOLogic.dest_number a), snd (HOLogic.dest_number b))
+ | t => Rat.rat_of_int (snd (HOLogic.dest_number t))
+
+fun mk_frac phi cT x =
+ let val (a, b) = Rat.quotient_of_rat x
+ in if b = 1 then Numeral.mk_cnumber cT a
+ else Thm.capply
+ (Thm.capply (Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME cT] []) @{cpat "op /"})
+ (Numeral.mk_cnumber cT a))
+ (Numeral.mk_cnumber cT b)
+ end
+
+fun whatis x ct = case term_of ct of
+ Const(@{const_name "HOL.plus"}, _)$(Const(@{const_name "HOL.times"},_)$_$y)$_ =>
+ if y aconv term_of x then ("c*x+t",[(funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg1) ct, Thm.dest_arg ct])
+ else ("Nox",[])
+| Const(@{const_name "HOL.plus"}, _)$y$_ =>
+ if y aconv term_of x then ("x+t",[Thm.dest_arg ct])
+ else ("Nox",[])
+| Const(@{const_name "HOL.times"}, _)$_$y =>
+ if y aconv term_of x then ("c*x",[Thm.dest_arg1 ct])
+ else ("Nox",[])
+| t => if t aconv term_of x then ("x",[]) else ("Nox",[]);
+
+fun xnormalize_conv ctxt [] ct = reflexive ct
+| xnormalize_conv ctxt (vs as (x::_)) ct =
+ case term_of ct of
+ Const(@{const_name HOL.less},_)$_$Const(@{const_name "HOL.zero"},_) =>
+ (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
+ ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
+ let
+ val cr = dest_frac c
+ val clt = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
+ val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
+ val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
+ val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
+ (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
+ else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
+ val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
+ val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x,t])
+ (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_sum_lt} else @{thm pos_prod_sum_lt})) cth
+ val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
+ in rth end
+ | ("x+t",[t]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_lt"}
+ val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
+ in rth end
+ | ("c*x",[c]) =>
+ let
+ val cr = dest_frac c
+ val clt = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
+ val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
+ val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
+ val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
+ (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
+ else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
+ val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
+ val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
+ (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_lt} else @{thm pos_prod_lt})) cth
+ val rth = th
+ in rth end
+ | _ => reflexive ct)
+
+
+| Const(@{const_name HOL.less_eq},_)$_$Const(@{const_name "HOL.zero"},_) =>
+ (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
+ ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val cr = dest_frac c
+ val clt = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "op <"}
+ val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
+ val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
+ val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
+ (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
+ else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
+ val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
+ val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [c,x,t])
+ (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_sum_le} else @{thm pos_prod_sum_le})) cth
+ val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
+ in rth end
+ | ("x+t",[t]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_le"}
+ val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
+ in rth end
+ | ("c*x",[c]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val cr = dest_frac c
+ val clt = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "op <"}
+ val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
+ val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
+ val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
+ (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
+ else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
+ val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
+ val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
+ (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_le} else @{thm pos_prod_le})) cth
+ val rth = th
+ in rth end
+ | _ => reflexive ct)
+
+| Const("op =",_)$_$Const(@{const_name "HOL.zero"},_) =>
+ (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
+ ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val cr = dest_frac c
+ val ceq = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
+ val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
+ val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Not"} (Thm.capply (Thm.capply ceq c) cz)))
+ val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
+ val th = implies_elim
+ (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [c,x,t]) @{thm nz_prod_sum_eq}) cth
+ val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
+ in rth end
+ | ("x+t",[t]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_eq"}
+ val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
+ in rth end
+ | ("c*x",[c]) =>
+ let
+ val T = ctyp_of_term x
+ val cr = dest_frac c
+ val ceq = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
+ val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
+ val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
+ (Thm.capply @{cterm "Not"} (Thm.capply (Thm.capply ceq c) cz)))
+ val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
+ val rth = implies_elim
+ (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [c,x]) @{thm nz_prod_eq}) cth
+ in rth end
+ | _ => reflexive ct);
+
+local
+ val less_iff_diff_less_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "less_iff_diff_less_0"}
+ val le_iff_diff_le_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "le_iff_diff_le_0"}
+ val eq_iff_diff_eq_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "eq_iff_diff_eq_0"}
+in
+fun field_isolate_conv phi ctxt vs ct = case term_of ct of
+ Const(@{const_name HOL.less},_)$a$b =>
+ let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
+ val T = ctyp_of_term ca
+ val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] less_iff_diff_less_0
+ val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
+ (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv @{context} (earlier vs)))) th
+ val rth = transitive nth (xnormalize_conv ctxt vs (Thm.rhs_of nth))
+ in rth end
+| Const(@{const_name HOL.less_eq},_)$a$b =>
+ let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
+ val T = ctyp_of_term ca
+ val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] le_iff_diff_le_0
+ val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
+ (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv @{context} (earlier vs)))) th
+ val rth = transitive nth (xnormalize_conv ctxt vs (Thm.rhs_of nth))
+ in rth end
+
+| Const("op =",_)$a$b =>
+ let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
+ val T = ctyp_of_term ca
+ val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] eq_iff_diff_eq_0
+ val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
+ (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
+ (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv @{context} (earlier vs)))) th
+ val rth = transitive nth (xnormalize_conv ctxt vs (Thm.rhs_of nth))
+ in rth end
+| @{term "Not"} $(Const("op =",_)$a$b) => Conv.arg_conv (field_isolate_conv phi ctxt vs) ct
+| _ => reflexive ct
+end;
+
+fun classfield_whatis phi =
+ let
+ fun h x t =
+ case term_of t of
+ Const("op =", _)$y$z => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | @{term "Not"}$(Const("op =", _)$y$z) => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | Const(@{const_name HOL.less},_)$y$z =>
+ if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
+ else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | Const (@{const_name HOL.less_eq},_)$y$z =>
+ if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
+ else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
+ else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ | _ => Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+ in h end;
+fun class_field_ss phi =
+ HOL_basic_ss addsimps ([@{thm "linorder_not_less"}, @{thm "linorder_not_le"}])
+ addsplits [@{thm "abs_split"},@{thm "split_max"}, @{thm "split_min"}]
+
+in
+Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.funs @{thm "class_ordered_field_dense_linear_order.ferrack_axiom"}
+ {isolate_conv = field_isolate_conv, whatis = classfield_whatis, simpset = class_field_ss}
+end
+*}
+
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Ferrack.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2101 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/Ferrack.thy
+ Author: Amine Chaieb
+*)
+
+theory Ferrack
+imports Complex_Main Dense_Linear_Order Efficient_Nat
+uses ("ferrack_tac.ML")
+begin
+
+section {* Quantifier elimination for @{text "\<real> (0, 1, +, <)"} *}
+
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+ (* SOME GENERAL STUFF< HAS TO BE MOVED IN SOME LIB *)
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+
+consts alluopairs:: "'a list \<Rightarrow> ('a \<times> 'a) list"
+primrec
+ "alluopairs [] = []"
+ "alluopairs (x#xs) = (map (Pair x) (x#xs))@(alluopairs xs)"
+
+lemma alluopairs_set1: "set (alluopairs xs) \<le> {(x,y). x\<in> set xs \<and> y\<in> set xs}"
+by (induct xs, auto)
+
+lemma alluopairs_set:
+ "\<lbrakk>x\<in> set xs ; y \<in> set xs\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x,y) \<in> set (alluopairs xs) \<or> (y,x) \<in> set (alluopairs xs) "
+by (induct xs, auto)
+
+lemma alluopairs_ex:
+ assumes Pc: "\<forall> x y. P x y = P y x"
+ shows "(\<exists> x \<in> set xs. \<exists> y \<in> set xs. P x y) = (\<exists> (x,y) \<in> set (alluopairs xs). P x y)"
+proof
+ assume "\<exists>x\<in>set xs. \<exists>y\<in>set xs. P x y"
+ then obtain x y where x: "x \<in> set xs" and y:"y \<in> set xs" and P: "P x y" by blast
+ from alluopairs_set[OF x y] P Pc show"\<exists>(x, y)\<in>set (alluopairs xs). P x y"
+ by auto
+next
+ assume "\<exists>(x, y)\<in>set (alluopairs xs). P x y"
+ then obtain "x" and "y" where xy:"(x,y) \<in> set (alluopairs xs)" and P: "P x y" by blast+
+ from xy have "x \<in> set xs \<and> y\<in> set xs" using alluopairs_set1 by blast
+ with P show "\<exists>x\<in>set xs. \<exists>y\<in>set xs. P x y" by blast
+qed
+
+lemma nth_pos2: "0 < n \<Longrightarrow> (x#xs) ! n = xs ! (n - 1)"
+using Nat.gr0_conv_Suc
+by clarsimp
+
+lemma filter_length: "length (List.filter P xs) < Suc (length xs)"
+ apply (induct xs, auto) done
+
+consts remdps:: "'a list \<Rightarrow> 'a list"
+
+recdef remdps "measure size"
+ "remdps [] = []"
+ "remdps (x#xs) = (x#(remdps (List.filter (\<lambda> y. y \<noteq> x) xs)))"
+(hints simp add: filter_length[rule_format])
+
+lemma remdps_set[simp]: "set (remdps xs) = set xs"
+ by (induct xs rule: remdps.induct, auto)
+
+
+
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+ (**** SHADOW SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS ****)
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+
+datatype num = C int | Bound nat | CN nat int num | Neg num | Add num num| Sub num num
+ | Mul int num
+
+ (* A size for num to make inductive proofs simpler*)
+consts num_size :: "num \<Rightarrow> nat"
+primrec
+ "num_size (C c) = 1"
+ "num_size (Bound n) = 1"
+ "num_size (Neg a) = 1 + num_size a"
+ "num_size (Add a b) = 1 + num_size a + num_size b"
+ "num_size (Sub a b) = 3 + num_size a + num_size b"
+ "num_size (Mul c a) = 1 + num_size a"
+ "num_size (CN n c a) = 3 + num_size a "
+
+ (* Semantics of numeral terms (num) *)
+consts Inum :: "real list \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> real"
+primrec
+ "Inum bs (C c) = (real c)"
+ "Inum bs (Bound n) = bs!n"
+ "Inum bs (CN n c a) = (real c) * (bs!n) + (Inum bs a)"
+ "Inum bs (Neg a) = -(Inum bs a)"
+ "Inum bs (Add a b) = Inum bs a + Inum bs b"
+ "Inum bs (Sub a b) = Inum bs a - Inum bs b"
+ "Inum bs (Mul c a) = (real c) * Inum bs a"
+ (* FORMULAE *)
+datatype fm =
+ T| F| Lt num| Le num| Gt num| Ge num| Eq num| NEq num|
+ NOT fm| And fm fm| Or fm fm| Imp fm fm| Iff fm fm| E fm| A fm
+
+
+ (* A size for fm *)
+consts fmsize :: "fm \<Rightarrow> nat"
+recdef fmsize "measure size"
+ "fmsize (NOT p) = 1 + fmsize p"
+ "fmsize (And p q) = 1 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+ "fmsize (Or p q) = 1 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+ "fmsize (Imp p q) = 3 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+ "fmsize (Iff p q) = 3 + 2*(fmsize p + fmsize q)"
+ "fmsize (E p) = 1 + fmsize p"
+ "fmsize (A p) = 4+ fmsize p"
+ "fmsize p = 1"
+ (* several lemmas about fmsize *)
+lemma fmsize_pos: "fmsize p > 0"
+by (induct p rule: fmsize.induct) simp_all
+
+ (* Semantics of formulae (fm) *)
+consts Ifm ::"real list \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> bool"
+primrec
+ "Ifm bs T = True"
+ "Ifm bs F = False"
+ "Ifm bs (Lt a) = (Inum bs a < 0)"
+ "Ifm bs (Gt a) = (Inum bs a > 0)"
+ "Ifm bs (Le a) = (Inum bs a \<le> 0)"
+ "Ifm bs (Ge a) = (Inum bs a \<ge> 0)"
+ "Ifm bs (Eq a) = (Inum bs a = 0)"
+ "Ifm bs (NEq a) = (Inum bs a \<noteq> 0)"
+ "Ifm bs (NOT p) = (\<not> (Ifm bs p))"
+ "Ifm bs (And p q) = (Ifm bs p \<and> Ifm bs q)"
+ "Ifm bs (Or p q) = (Ifm bs p \<or> Ifm bs q)"
+ "Ifm bs (Imp p q) = ((Ifm bs p) \<longrightarrow> (Ifm bs q))"
+ "Ifm bs (Iff p q) = (Ifm bs p = Ifm bs q)"
+ "Ifm bs (E p) = (\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p)"
+ "Ifm bs (A p) = (\<forall> x. Ifm (x#bs) p)"
+
+lemma IfmLeSub: "\<lbrakk> Inum bs s = s' ; Inum bs t = t' \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (Le (Sub s t)) = (s' \<le> t')"
+apply simp
+done
+
+lemma IfmLtSub: "\<lbrakk> Inum bs s = s' ; Inum bs t = t' \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (Lt (Sub s t)) = (s' < t')"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmEqSub: "\<lbrakk> Inum bs s = s' ; Inum bs t = t' \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (Eq (Sub s t)) = (s' = t')"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmNOT: " (Ifm bs p = P) \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (NOT p) = (\<not>P))"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmAnd: " \<lbrakk> Ifm bs p = P ; Ifm bs q = Q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (And p q) = (P \<and> Q))"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmOr: " \<lbrakk> Ifm bs p = P ; Ifm bs q = Q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (Or p q) = (P \<or> Q))"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmImp: " \<lbrakk> Ifm bs p = P ; Ifm bs q = Q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (Imp p q) = (P \<longrightarrow> Q))"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmIff: " \<lbrakk> Ifm bs p = P ; Ifm bs q = Q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (Iff p q) = (P = Q))"
+apply simp
+done
+
+lemma IfmE: " (!! x. Ifm (x#bs) p = P x) \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (E p) = (\<exists>x. P x))"
+apply simp
+done
+lemma IfmA: " (!! x. Ifm (x#bs) p = P x) \<Longrightarrow> (Ifm bs (A p) = (\<forall>x. P x))"
+apply simp
+done
+
+consts not:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef not "measure size"
+ "not (NOT p) = p"
+ "not T = F"
+ "not F = T"
+ "not p = NOT p"
+lemma not[simp]: "Ifm bs (not p) = Ifm bs (NOT p)"
+by (cases p) auto
+
+constdefs conj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "conj p q \<equiv> (if (p = F \<or> q=F) then F else if p=T then q else if q=T then p else
+ if p = q then p else And p q)"
+lemma conj[simp]: "Ifm bs (conj p q) = Ifm bs (And p q)"
+by (cases "p=F \<or> q=F",simp_all add: conj_def) (cases p,simp_all)
+
+constdefs disj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "disj p q \<equiv> (if (p = T \<or> q=T) then T else if p=F then q else if q=F then p
+ else if p=q then p else Or p q)"
+
+lemma disj[simp]: "Ifm bs (disj p q) = Ifm bs (Or p q)"
+by (cases "p=T \<or> q=T",simp_all add: disj_def) (cases p,simp_all)
+
+constdefs imp :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "imp p q \<equiv> (if (p = F \<or> q=T \<or> p=q) then T else if p=T then q else if q=F then not p
+ else Imp p q)"
+lemma imp[simp]: "Ifm bs (imp p q) = Ifm bs (Imp p q)"
+by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def)
+
+constdefs iff :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "iff p q \<equiv> (if (p = q) then T else if (p = NOT q \<or> NOT p = q) then F else
+ if p=F then not q else if q=F then not p else if p=T then q else if q=T then p else
+ Iff p q)"
+lemma iff[simp]: "Ifm bs (iff p q) = Ifm bs (Iff p q)"
+ by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", simp,cases "p=NOT q", simp) (cases "NOT p= q", auto)
+
+lemma conj_simps:
+ "conj F Q = F"
+ "conj P F = F"
+ "conj T Q = Q"
+ "conj P T = P"
+ "conj P P = P"
+ "P \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> Q \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> Q \<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> Q \<Longrightarrow> conj P Q = And P Q"
+ by (simp_all add: conj_def)
+
+lemma disj_simps:
+ "disj T Q = T"
+ "disj P T = T"
+ "disj F Q = Q"
+ "disj P F = P"
+ "disj P P = P"
+ "P \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> Q \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> Q \<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> Q \<Longrightarrow> disj P Q = Or P Q"
+ by (simp_all add: disj_def)
+lemma imp_simps:
+ "imp F Q = T"
+ "imp P T = T"
+ "imp T Q = Q"
+ "imp P F = not P"
+ "imp P P = T"
+ "P \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> P \<noteq> Q \<Longrightarrow> Q \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> Q \<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> imp P Q = Imp P Q"
+ by (simp_all add: imp_def)
+lemma trivNOT: "p \<noteq> NOT p" "NOT p \<noteq> p"
+apply (induct p, auto)
+done
+
+lemma iff_simps:
+ "iff p p = T"
+ "iff p (NOT p) = F"
+ "iff (NOT p) p = F"
+ "iff p F = not p"
+ "iff F p = not p"
+ "p \<noteq> NOT T \<Longrightarrow> iff T p = p"
+ "p\<noteq> NOT T \<Longrightarrow> iff p T = p"
+ "p\<noteq>q \<Longrightarrow> p\<noteq> NOT q \<Longrightarrow> q\<noteq> NOT p \<Longrightarrow> p\<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> q\<noteq> F \<Longrightarrow> p \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> q \<noteq> T \<Longrightarrow> iff p q = Iff p q"
+ using trivNOT
+ by (simp_all add: iff_def, cases p, auto)
+ (* Quantifier freeness *)
+consts qfree:: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef qfree "measure size"
+ "qfree (E p) = False"
+ "qfree (A p) = False"
+ "qfree (NOT p) = qfree p"
+ "qfree (And p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree (Or p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree (Imp p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree (Iff p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ "qfree p = True"
+
+ (* Boundedness and substitution *)
+consts
+ numbound0:: "num \<Rightarrow> bool" (* a num is INDEPENDENT of Bound 0 *)
+ bound0:: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* A Formula is independent of Bound 0 *)
+primrec
+ "numbound0 (C c) = True"
+ "numbound0 (Bound n) = (n>0)"
+ "numbound0 (CN n c a) = (n\<noteq>0 \<and> numbound0 a)"
+ "numbound0 (Neg a) = numbound0 a"
+ "numbound0 (Add a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+ "numbound0 (Sub a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+ "numbound0 (Mul i a) = numbound0 a"
+lemma numbound0_I:
+ assumes nb: "numbound0 a"
+ shows "Inum (b#bs) a = Inum (b'#bs) a"
+using nb
+by (induct a rule: numbound0.induct,auto simp add: nth_pos2)
+
+primrec
+ "bound0 T = True"
+ "bound0 F = True"
+ "bound0 (Lt a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Le a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Gt a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Ge a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (Eq a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (NEq a) = numbound0 a"
+ "bound0 (NOT p) = bound0 p"
+ "bound0 (And p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ "bound0 (Or p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ "bound0 (Imp p q) = ((bound0 p) \<and> (bound0 q))"
+ "bound0 (Iff p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ "bound0 (E p) = False"
+ "bound0 (A p) = False"
+
+lemma bound0_I:
+ assumes bp: "bound0 p"
+ shows "Ifm (b#bs) p = Ifm (b'#bs) p"
+using bp numbound0_I[where b="b" and bs="bs" and b'="b'"]
+by (induct p rule: bound0.induct) (auto simp add: nth_pos2)
+
+lemma not_qf[simp]: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (not p)"
+by (cases p, auto)
+lemma not_bn[simp]: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (not p)"
+by (cases p, auto)
+
+
+lemma conj_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (conj p q)"
+using conj_def by auto
+lemma conj_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (conj p q)"
+using conj_def by auto
+
+lemma disj_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (disj p q)"
+using disj_def by auto
+lemma disj_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (disj p q)"
+using disj_def by auto
+
+lemma imp_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (imp p q)"
+using imp_def by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def)
+lemma imp_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (imp p q)"
+using imp_def by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T \<or> p=q",simp_all add: imp_def)
+
+lemma iff_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (iff p q)"
+ by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", auto)
+lemma iff_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (iff p q)"
+using iff_def by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", auto)
+
+consts
+ decrnum:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ decr :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+
+recdef decrnum "measure size"
+ "decrnum (Bound n) = Bound (n - 1)"
+ "decrnum (Neg a) = Neg (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (Add a b) = Add (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum (Sub a b) = Sub (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum (Mul c a) = Mul c (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (CN n c a) = CN (n - 1) c (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum a = a"
+
+recdef decr "measure size"
+ "decr (Lt a) = Lt (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Le a) = Le (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Gt a) = Gt (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Ge a) = Ge (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Eq a) = Eq (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NEq a) = NEq (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NOT p) = NOT (decr p)"
+ "decr (And p q) = conj (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Or p q) = disj (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Imp p q) = imp (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Iff p q) = iff (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr p = p"
+
+lemma decrnum: assumes nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "Inum (x#bs) t = Inum bs (decrnum t)"
+ using nb by (induct t rule: decrnum.induct, simp_all add: nth_pos2)
+
+lemma decr: assumes nb: "bound0 p"
+ shows "Ifm (x#bs) p = Ifm bs (decr p)"
+ using nb
+ by (induct p rule: decr.induct, simp_all add: nth_pos2 decrnum)
+
+lemma decr_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (decr p)"
+by (induct p, simp_all)
+
+consts
+ isatom :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* test for atomicity *)
+recdef isatom "measure size"
+ "isatom T = True"
+ "isatom F = True"
+ "isatom (Lt a) = True"
+ "isatom (Le a) = True"
+ "isatom (Gt a) = True"
+ "isatom (Ge a) = True"
+ "isatom (Eq a) = True"
+ "isatom (NEq a) = True"
+ "isatom p = False"
+
+lemma bound0_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
+by (induct p, simp_all)
+
+constdefs djf:: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "djf f p q \<equiv> (if q=T then T else if q=F then f p else
+ (let fp = f p in case fp of T \<Rightarrow> T | F \<Rightarrow> q | _ \<Rightarrow> Or (f p) q))"
+constdefs evaldjf:: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "evaldjf f ps \<equiv> foldr (djf f) ps F"
+
+lemma djf_Or: "Ifm bs (djf f p q) = Ifm bs (Or (f p) q)"
+by (cases "q=T", simp add: djf_def,cases "q=F",simp add: djf_def)
+(cases "f p", simp_all add: Let_def djf_def)
+
+
+lemma djf_simps:
+ "djf f p T = T"
+ "djf f p F = f p"
+ "q\<noteq>T \<Longrightarrow> q\<noteq>F \<Longrightarrow> djf f p q = (let fp = f p in case fp of T \<Rightarrow> T | F \<Rightarrow> q | _ \<Rightarrow> Or (f p) q)"
+ by (simp_all add: djf_def)
+
+lemma evaldjf_ex: "Ifm bs (evaldjf f ps) = (\<exists> p \<in> set ps. Ifm bs (f p))"
+ by(induct ps, simp_all add: evaldjf_def djf_Or)
+
+lemma evaldjf_bound0:
+ assumes nb: "\<forall> x\<in> set xs. bound0 (f x)"
+ shows "bound0 (evaldjf f xs)"
+ using nb by (induct xs, auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def) (case_tac "f a", auto)
+
+lemma evaldjf_qf:
+ assumes nb: "\<forall> x\<in> set xs. qfree (f x)"
+ shows "qfree (evaldjf f xs)"
+ using nb by (induct xs, auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def) (case_tac "f a", auto)
+
+consts disjuncts :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm list"
+recdef disjuncts "measure size"
+ "disjuncts (Or p q) = (disjuncts p) @ (disjuncts q)"
+ "disjuncts F = []"
+ "disjuncts p = [p]"
+
+lemma disjuncts: "(\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs q) = Ifm bs p"
+by(induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+
+lemma disjuncts_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). bound0 q"
+proof-
+ assume nb: "bound0 p"
+ hence "list_all bound0 (disjuncts p)" by (induct p rule:disjuncts.induct,auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+
+lemma disjuncts_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q"
+proof-
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ hence "list_all qfree (disjuncts p)"
+ by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+
+constdefs DJ :: "(fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "DJ f p \<equiv> evaldjf f (disjuncts p)"
+
+lemma DJ: assumes fdj: "\<forall> p q. Ifm bs (f (Or p q)) = Ifm bs (Or (f p) (f q))"
+ and fF: "f F = F"
+ shows "Ifm bs (DJ f p) = Ifm bs (f p)"
+proof-
+ have "Ifm bs (DJ f p) = (\<exists> q \<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs (f q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bs (f p)" using fdj fF by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma DJ_qf: assumes
+ fqf: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (f p)"
+ shows "\<forall>p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ f p) "
+proof(clarify)
+ fix p assume qf: "qfree p"
+ have th: "DJ f p = evaldjf f (disjuncts p)" by (simp add: DJ_def)
+ from disjuncts_qf[OF qf] have "\<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q" .
+ with fqf have th':"\<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree (f q)" by blast
+
+ from evaldjf_qf[OF th'] th show "qfree (DJ f p)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma DJ_qe: assumes qe: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs (qe p) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs ((DJ qe p)) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+proof(clarify)
+ fix p::fm and bs
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ from qe have qth: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p)" by blast
+ from DJ_qf[OF qth] qf have qfth:"qfree (DJ qe p)" by auto
+ have "Ifm bs (DJ qe p) = (\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs (qe q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> q \<in> set(disjuncts p). Ifm bs (E q))" using qe disjuncts_qf[OF qf] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bs (E p)" by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show "qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> Ifm bs (DJ qe p) = Ifm bs (E p)" using qfth by blast
+qed
+ (* Simplification *)
+consts
+ numgcd :: "num \<Rightarrow> int"
+ numgcdh:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
+ reducecoeffh:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num"
+ reducecoeff :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ dvdnumcoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
+consts maxcoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> int"
+recdef maxcoeff "measure size"
+ "maxcoeff (C i) = abs i"
+ "maxcoeff (CN n c t) = max (abs c) (maxcoeff t)"
+ "maxcoeff t = 1"
+
+lemma maxcoeff_pos: "maxcoeff t \<ge> 0"
+ by (induct t rule: maxcoeff.induct, auto)
+
+recdef numgcdh "measure size"
+ "numgcdh (C i) = (\<lambda>g. zgcd i g)"
+ "numgcdh (CN n c t) = (\<lambda>g. zgcd c (numgcdh t g))"
+ "numgcdh t = (\<lambda>g. 1)"
+defs numgcd_def [code]: "numgcd t \<equiv> numgcdh t (maxcoeff t)"
+
+recdef reducecoeffh "measure size"
+ "reducecoeffh (C i) = (\<lambda> g. C (i div g))"
+ "reducecoeffh (CN n c t) = (\<lambda> g. CN n (c div g) (reducecoeffh t g))"
+ "reducecoeffh t = (\<lambda>g. t)"
+
+defs reducecoeff_def: "reducecoeff t \<equiv>
+ (let g = numgcd t in
+ if g = 0 then C 0 else if g=1 then t else reducecoeffh t g)"
+
+recdef dvdnumcoeff "measure size"
+ "dvdnumcoeff (C i) = (\<lambda> g. g dvd i)"
+ "dvdnumcoeff (CN n c t) = (\<lambda> g. g dvd c \<and> (dvdnumcoeff t g))"
+ "dvdnumcoeff t = (\<lambda>g. False)"
+
+lemma dvdnumcoeff_trans:
+ assumes gdg: "g dvd g'" and dgt':"dvdnumcoeff t g'"
+ shows "dvdnumcoeff t g"
+ using dgt' gdg
+ by (induct t rule: dvdnumcoeff.induct, simp_all add: gdg zdvd_trans[OF gdg])
+
+declare zdvd_trans [trans add]
+
+lemma natabs0: "(nat (abs x) = 0) = (x = 0)"
+by arith
+
+lemma numgcd0:
+ assumes g0: "numgcd t = 0"
+ shows "Inum bs t = 0"
+ using g0[simplified numgcd_def]
+ by (induct t rule: numgcdh.induct, auto simp add: zgcd_def gcd_zero natabs0 max_def maxcoeff_pos)
+
+lemma numgcdh_pos: assumes gp: "g \<ge> 0" shows "numgcdh t g \<ge> 0"
+ using gp
+ by (induct t rule: numgcdh.induct, auto simp add: zgcd_def)
+
+lemma numgcd_pos: "numgcd t \<ge>0"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def numgcdh_pos maxcoeff_pos)
+
+lemma reducecoeffh:
+ assumes gt: "dvdnumcoeff t g" and gp: "g > 0"
+ shows "real g *(Inum bs (reducecoeffh t g)) = Inum bs t"
+ using gt
+proof(induct t rule: reducecoeffh.induct)
+ case (1 i) hence gd: "g dvd i" by simp
+ from gp have gnz: "g \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems show ?case by (simp add: real_of_int_div[OF gnz gd])
+next
+ case (2 n c t) hence gd: "g dvd c" by simp
+ from gp have gnz: "g \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems show ?case by (simp add: real_of_int_div[OF gnz gd] algebra_simps)
+qed (auto simp add: numgcd_def gp)
+consts ismaxcoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef ismaxcoeff "measure size"
+ "ismaxcoeff (C i) = (\<lambda> x. abs i \<le> x)"
+ "ismaxcoeff (CN n c t) = (\<lambda>x. abs c \<le> x \<and> (ismaxcoeff t x))"
+ "ismaxcoeff t = (\<lambda>x. True)"
+
+lemma ismaxcoeff_mono: "ismaxcoeff t c \<Longrightarrow> c \<le> c' \<Longrightarrow> ismaxcoeff t c'"
+by (induct t rule: ismaxcoeff.induct, auto)
+
+lemma maxcoeff_ismaxcoeff: "ismaxcoeff t (maxcoeff t)"
+proof (induct t rule: maxcoeff.induct)
+ case (2 n c t)
+ hence H:"ismaxcoeff t (maxcoeff t)" .
+ have thh: "maxcoeff t \<le> max (abs c) (maxcoeff t)" by (simp add: le_maxI2)
+ from ismaxcoeff_mono[OF H thh] show ?case by (simp add: le_maxI1)
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma zgcd_gt1: "zgcd i j > 1 \<Longrightarrow> ((abs i > 1 \<and> abs j > 1) \<or> (abs i = 0 \<and> abs j > 1) \<or> (abs i > 1 \<and> abs j = 0))"
+ apply (cases "abs i = 0", simp_all add: zgcd_def)
+ apply (cases "abs j = 0", simp_all)
+ apply (cases "abs i = 1", simp_all)
+ apply (cases "abs j = 1", simp_all)
+ apply auto
+ done
+lemma numgcdh0:"numgcdh t m = 0 \<Longrightarrow> m =0"
+ by (induct t rule: numgcdh.induct, auto simp add:zgcd0)
+
+lemma dvdnumcoeff_aux:
+ assumes "ismaxcoeff t m" and mp:"m \<ge> 0" and "numgcdh t m > 1"
+ shows "dvdnumcoeff t (numgcdh t m)"
+using prems
+proof(induct t rule: numgcdh.induct)
+ case (2 n c t)
+ let ?g = "numgcdh t m"
+ from prems have th:"zgcd c ?g > 1" by simp
+ from zgcd_gt1[OF th] numgcdh_pos[OF mp, where t="t"]
+ have "(abs c > 1 \<and> ?g > 1) \<or> (abs c = 0 \<and> ?g > 1) \<or> (abs c > 1 \<and> ?g = 0)" by simp
+ moreover {assume "abs c > 1" and gp: "?g > 1" with prems
+ have th: "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" by simp
+ have th': "zgcd c ?g dvd ?g" by (simp add:zgcd_zdvd2)
+ from dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF th' th] have ?case by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)}
+ moreover {assume "abs c = 0 \<and> ?g > 1"
+ with prems have th: "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" by simp
+ have th': "zgcd c ?g dvd ?g" by (simp add:zgcd_zdvd2)
+ from dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF th' th] have ?case by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ moreover {assume "abs c > 1" and g0:"?g = 0"
+ from numgcdh0[OF g0] have "m=0". with prems have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed(auto simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+
+lemma dvdnumcoeff_aux2:
+ assumes "numgcd t > 1" shows "dvdnumcoeff t (numgcd t) \<and> numgcd t > 0"
+ using prems
+proof (simp add: numgcd_def)
+ let ?mc = "maxcoeff t"
+ let ?g = "numgcdh t ?mc"
+ have th1: "ismaxcoeff t ?mc" by (rule maxcoeff_ismaxcoeff)
+ have th2: "?mc \<ge> 0" by (rule maxcoeff_pos)
+ assume H: "numgcdh t ?mc > 1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux[OF th1 th2 H] show "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" .
+qed
+
+lemma reducecoeff: "real (numgcd t) * (Inum bs (reducecoeff t)) = Inum bs t"
+proof-
+ let ?g = "numgcd t"
+ have "?g \<ge> 0" by (simp add: numgcd_pos)
+ hence "?g = 0 \<or> ?g = 1 \<or> ?g > 1" by auto
+ moreover {assume "?g = 0" hence ?thesis by (simp add: numgcd0)}
+ moreover {assume "?g = 1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: reducecoeff_def)}
+ moreover { assume g1:"?g > 1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux2[OF g1] have th1:"dvdnumcoeff t ?g" and g0: "?g > 0" by blast+
+ from reducecoeffh[OF th1 g0, where bs="bs"] g1 have ?thesis
+ by (simp add: reducecoeff_def Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma reducecoeffh_numbound0: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (reducecoeffh t g)"
+by (induct t rule: reducecoeffh.induct, auto)
+
+lemma reducecoeff_numbound0: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (reducecoeff t)"
+using reducecoeffh_numbound0 by (simp add: reducecoeff_def Let_def)
+
+consts
+ simpnum:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ numadd:: "num \<times> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ nummul:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num"
+recdef numadd "measure (\<lambda> (t,s). size t + size s)"
+ "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1,CN n2 c2 r2) =
+ (if n1=n2 then
+ (let c = c1 + c2
+ in (if c=0 then numadd(r1,r2) else CN n1 c (numadd (r1,r2))))
+ else if n1 \<le> n2 then (CN n1 c1 (numadd (r1,CN n2 c2 r2)))
+ else (CN n2 c2 (numadd (CN n1 c1 r1,r2))))"
+ "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1,t) = CN n1 c1 (numadd (r1, t))"
+ "numadd (t,CN n2 c2 r2) = CN n2 c2 (numadd (t,r2))"
+ "numadd (C b1, C b2) = C (b1+b2)"
+ "numadd (a,b) = Add a b"
+
+lemma numadd[simp]: "Inum bs (numadd (t,s)) = Inum bs (Add t s)"
+apply (induct t s rule: numadd.induct, simp_all add: Let_def)
+apply (case_tac "c1+c2 = 0",case_tac "n1 \<le> n2", simp_all)
+apply (case_tac "n1 = n2", simp_all add: algebra_simps)
+by (simp only: left_distrib[symmetric],simp)
+
+lemma numadd_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk> numbound0 t ; numbound0 s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numadd (t,s))"
+by (induct t s rule: numadd.induct, auto simp add: Let_def)
+
+recdef nummul "measure size"
+ "nummul (C j) = (\<lambda> i. C (i*j))"
+ "nummul (CN n c a) = (\<lambda> i. CN n (i*c) (nummul a i))"
+ "nummul t = (\<lambda> i. Mul i t)"
+
+lemma nummul[simp]: "\<And> i. Inum bs (nummul t i) = Inum bs (Mul i t)"
+by (induct t rule: nummul.induct, auto simp add: algebra_simps)
+
+lemma nummul_nb[simp]: "\<And> i. numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (nummul t i)"
+by (induct t rule: nummul.induct, auto )
+
+constdefs numneg :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ "numneg t \<equiv> nummul t (- 1)"
+
+constdefs numsub :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ "numsub s t \<equiv> (if s = t then C 0 else numadd (s,numneg t))"
+
+lemma numneg[simp]: "Inum bs (numneg t) = Inum bs (Neg t)"
+using numneg_def by simp
+
+lemma numneg_nb[simp]: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numneg t)"
+using numneg_def by simp
+
+lemma numsub[simp]: "Inum bs (numsub a b) = Inum bs (Sub a b)"
+using numsub_def by simp
+
+lemma numsub_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk> numbound0 t ; numbound0 s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numsub t s)"
+using numsub_def by simp
+
+recdef simpnum "measure size"
+ "simpnum (C j) = C j"
+ "simpnum (Bound n) = CN n 1 (C 0)"
+ "simpnum (Neg t) = numneg (simpnum t)"
+ "simpnum (Add t s) = numadd (simpnum t,simpnum s)"
+ "simpnum (Sub t s) = numsub (simpnum t) (simpnum s)"
+ "simpnum (Mul i t) = (if i = 0 then (C 0) else nummul (simpnum t) i)"
+ "simpnum (CN n c t) = (if c = 0 then simpnum t else numadd (CN n c (C 0),simpnum t))"
+
+lemma simpnum_ci[simp]: "Inum bs (simpnum t) = Inum bs t"
+by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto simp add: numneg numadd numsub nummul)
+
+lemma simpnum_numbound0[simp]:
+ "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (simpnum t)"
+by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto)
+
+consts nozerocoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef nozerocoeff "measure size"
+ "nozerocoeff (C c) = True"
+ "nozerocoeff (CN n c t) = (c\<noteq>0 \<and> nozerocoeff t)"
+ "nozerocoeff t = True"
+
+lemma numadd_nz : "nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff b \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numadd (a,b))"
+by (induct a b rule: numadd.induct,auto simp add: Let_def)
+
+lemma nummul_nz : "\<And> i. i\<noteq>0 \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (nummul a i)"
+by (induct a rule: nummul.induct,auto simp add: Let_def numadd_nz)
+
+lemma numneg_nz : "nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numneg a)"
+by (simp add: numneg_def nummul_nz)
+
+lemma numsub_nz: "nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff b \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numsub a b)"
+by (simp add: numsub_def numneg_nz numadd_nz)
+
+lemma simpnum_nz: "nozerocoeff (simpnum t)"
+by(induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto simp add: numadd_nz numneg_nz numsub_nz nummul_nz)
+
+lemma maxcoeff_nz: "nozerocoeff t \<Longrightarrow> maxcoeff t = 0 \<Longrightarrow> t = C 0"
+proof (induct t rule: maxcoeff.induct)
+ case (2 n c t)
+ hence cnz: "c \<noteq>0" and mx: "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) = 0" by simp+
+ have "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) \<ge> abs c" by (simp add: le_maxI1)
+ with cnz have "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) > 0" by arith
+ with prems show ?case by simp
+qed auto
+
+lemma numgcd_nz: assumes nz: "nozerocoeff t" and g0: "numgcd t = 0" shows "t = C 0"
+proof-
+ from g0 have th:"numgcdh t (maxcoeff t) = 0" by (simp add: numgcd_def)
+ from numgcdh0[OF th] have th:"maxcoeff t = 0" .
+ from maxcoeff_nz[OF nz th] show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+constdefs simp_num_pair:: "(num \<times> int) \<Rightarrow> num \<times> int"
+ "simp_num_pair \<equiv> (\<lambda> (t,n). (if n = 0 then (C 0, 0) else
+ (let t' = simpnum t ; g = numgcd t' in
+ if g > 1 then (let g' = zgcd n g in
+ if g' = 1 then (t',n)
+ else (reducecoeffh t' g', n div g'))
+ else (t',n))))"
+
+lemma simp_num_pair_ci:
+ shows "((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum bs t / real n) (simp_num_pair (t,n))) = ((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum bs t / real n) (t,n))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof-
+ let ?t' = "simpnum t"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?t'"
+ let ?g' = "zgcd n ?g"
+ {assume nz: "n = 0" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover
+ { assume nnz: "n \<noteq> 0"
+ {assume "\<not> ?g > 1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def simpnum_ci)}
+ moreover
+ {assume g1:"?g>1" hence g0: "?g > 0" by simp
+ from zgcd0 g1 nnz have gp0: "?g' \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ hence g'p: "?g' > 0" using zgcd_pos[where i="n" and j="numgcd ?t'"] by arith
+ hence "?g'= 1 \<or> ?g' > 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume "?g'=1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def simpnum_ci)}
+ moreover {assume g'1:"?g'>1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux2[OF g1] have th1:"dvdnumcoeff ?t' ?g" ..
+ let ?tt = "reducecoeffh ?t' ?g'"
+ let ?t = "Inum bs ?tt"
+ have gpdg: "?g' dvd ?g" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd2)
+ have gpdd: "?g' dvd n" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ have gpdgp: "?g' dvd ?g'" by simp
+ from reducecoeffh[OF dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF gpdg th1] g'p]
+ have th2:"real ?g' * ?t = Inum bs ?t'" by simp
+ from prems have "?lhs = ?t / real (n div ?g')" by (simp add: simp_num_pair_def Let_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real ?g' * ?t) / (real ?g' * (real (n div ?g')))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (Inum bs ?t' / real n)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF gp0 gpdd] th2 gp0 by simp
+ finally have "?lhs = Inum bs t / real n" by (simp add: simpnum_ci)
+ then have ?thesis using prems by (simp add: simp_num_pair_def)}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma simp_num_pair_l: assumes tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "n >0" and tn: "simp_num_pair (t,n) = (t',n')"
+ shows "numbound0 t' \<and> n' >0"
+proof-
+ let ?t' = "simpnum t"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?t'"
+ let ?g' = "zgcd n ?g"
+ {assume nz: "n = 0" hence ?thesis using prems by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover
+ { assume nnz: "n \<noteq> 0"
+ {assume "\<not> ?g > 1" hence ?thesis using prems by (auto simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def simpnum_numbound0)}
+ moreover
+ {assume g1:"?g>1" hence g0: "?g > 0" by simp
+ from zgcd0 g1 nnz have gp0: "?g' \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ hence g'p: "?g' > 0" using zgcd_pos[where i="n" and j="numgcd ?t'"] by arith
+ hence "?g'= 1 \<or> ?g' > 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume "?g'=1" hence ?thesis using prems
+ by (auto simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def simpnum_numbound0)}
+ moreover {assume g'1:"?g'>1"
+ have gpdg: "?g' dvd ?g" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd2)
+ have gpdd: "?g' dvd n" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ have gpdgp: "?g' dvd ?g'" by simp
+ from zdvd_imp_le[OF gpdd np] have g'n: "?g' \<le> n" .
+ from zdiv_mono1[OF g'n g'p, simplified zdiv_self[OF gp0]]
+ have "n div ?g' >0" by simp
+ hence ?thesis using prems
+ by(auto simp add: simp_num_pair_def Let_def reducecoeffh_numbound0 simpnum_numbound0)}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+consts simpfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef simpfm "measure fmsize"
+ "simpfm (And p q) = conj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (Or p q) = disj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (Imp p q) = imp (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (Iff p q) = iff (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (NOT p) = not (simpfm p)"
+ "simpfm (Lt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v < 0) then T else F
+ | _ \<Rightarrow> Lt a')"
+ "simpfm (Le a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<le> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Le a')"
+ "simpfm (Gt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v > 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Gt a')"
+ "simpfm (Ge a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<ge> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Ge a')"
+ "simpfm (Eq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v = 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Eq a')"
+ "simpfm (NEq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<noteq> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> NEq a')"
+ "simpfm p = p"
+lemma simpfm: "Ifm bs (simpfm p) = Ifm bs p"
+proof(induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
+ case (6 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (10 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (11 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a"
+ from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume "\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)" hence ?case using sa
+ by (cases ?sa, simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed (induct p rule: simpfm.induct, simp_all add: conj disj imp iff not)
+
+
+lemma simpfm_bound0: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (simpfm p)"
+proof(induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
+ case (6 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (7 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (8 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (9 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (10 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+next
+ case (11 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+qed(auto simp add: disj_def imp_def iff_def conj_def not_bn)
+
+lemma simpfm_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (simpfm p)"
+by (induct p rule: simpfm.induct, auto simp add: disj_qf imp_qf iff_qf conj_qf not_qf Let_def)
+ (case_tac "simpnum a",auto)+
+
+consts prep :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef prep "measure fmsize"
+ "prep (E T) = T"
+ "prep (E F) = F"
+ "prep (E (Or p q)) = disj (prep (E p)) (prep (E q))"
+ "prep (E (Imp p q)) = disj (prep (E (NOT p))) (prep (E q))"
+ "prep (E (Iff p q)) = disj (prep (E (And p q))) (prep (E (And (NOT p) (NOT q))))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (And p q))) = disj (prep (E (NOT p))) (prep (E(NOT q)))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (Imp p q))) = prep (E (And p (NOT q)))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (Iff p q))) = disj (prep (E (And p (NOT q)))) (prep (E(And (NOT p) q)))"
+ "prep (E p) = E (prep p)"
+ "prep (A (And p q)) = conj (prep (A p)) (prep (A q))"
+ "prep (A p) = prep (NOT (E (NOT p)))"
+ "prep (NOT (NOT p)) = prep p"
+ "prep (NOT (And p q)) = disj (prep (NOT p)) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (A p)) = prep (E (NOT p))"
+ "prep (NOT (Or p q)) = conj (prep (NOT p)) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (Imp p q)) = conj (prep p) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (Iff p q)) = disj (prep (And p (NOT q))) (prep (And (NOT p) q))"
+ "prep (NOT p) = not (prep p)"
+ "prep (Or p q) = disj (prep p) (prep q)"
+ "prep (And p q) = conj (prep p) (prep q)"
+ "prep (Imp p q) = prep (Or (NOT p) q)"
+ "prep (Iff p q) = disj (prep (And p q)) (prep (And (NOT p) (NOT q)))"
+ "prep p = p"
+(hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+lemma prep: "\<And> bs. Ifm bs (prep p) = Ifm bs p"
+by (induct p rule: prep.induct, auto)
+
+ (* Generic quantifier elimination *)
+consts qelim :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef qelim "measure fmsize"
+ "qelim (E p) = (\<lambda> qe. DJ qe (qelim p qe))"
+ "qelim (A p) = (\<lambda> qe. not (qe ((qelim (NOT p) qe))))"
+ "qelim (NOT p) = (\<lambda> qe. not (qelim p qe))"
+ "qelim (And p q) = (\<lambda> qe. conj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Or p q) = (\<lambda> qe. disj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Imp p q) = (\<lambda> qe. imp (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Iff p q) = (\<lambda> qe. iff (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim p = (\<lambda> y. simpfm p)"
+
+lemma qelim_ci:
+ assumes qe_inv: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs (qe p) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<And> bs. qfree (qelim p qe) \<and> (Ifm bs (qelim p qe) = Ifm bs p)"
+using qe_inv DJ_qe[OF qe_inv]
+by(induct p rule: qelim.induct)
+(auto simp add: not disj conj iff imp not_qf disj_qf conj_qf imp_qf iff_qf
+ simpfm simpfm_qf simp del: simpfm.simps)
+
+consts
+ plusinf:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Virtual substitution of +\<infinity>*)
+ minusinf:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Virtual substitution of -\<infinity>*)
+recdef minusinf "measure size"
+ "minusinf (And p q) = conj (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
+ "minusinf (Or p q) = disj (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
+ "minusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf p = p"
+
+recdef plusinf "measure size"
+ "plusinf (And p q) = conj (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
+ "plusinf (Or p q) = disj (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
+ "plusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf p = p"
+
+consts
+ isrlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* Linearity test for fm *)
+recdef isrlfm "measure size"
+ "isrlfm (And p q) = (isrlfm p \<and> isrlfm q)"
+ "isrlfm (Or p q) = (isrlfm p \<and> isrlfm q)"
+ "isrlfm (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm p = (isatom p \<and> (bound0 p))"
+
+ (* splits the bounded from the unbounded part*)
+consts rsplit0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<times> num"
+recdef rsplit0 "measure num_size"
+ "rsplit0 (Bound 0) = (1,C 0)"
+ "rsplit0 (Add a b) = (let (ca,ta) = rsplit0 a ; (cb,tb) = rsplit0 b
+ in (ca+cb, Add ta tb))"
+ "rsplit0 (Sub a b) = rsplit0 (Add a (Neg b))"
+ "rsplit0 (Neg a) = (let (c,t) = rsplit0 a in (-c,Neg t))"
+ "rsplit0 (Mul c a) = (let (ca,ta) = rsplit0 a in (c*ca,Mul c ta))"
+ "rsplit0 (CN 0 c a) = (let (ca,ta) = rsplit0 a in (c+ca,ta))"
+ "rsplit0 (CN n c a) = (let (ca,ta) = rsplit0 a in (ca,CN n c ta))"
+ "rsplit0 t = (0,t)"
+lemma rsplit0:
+ shows "Inum bs ((split (CN 0)) (rsplit0 t)) = Inum bs t \<and> numbound0 (snd (rsplit0 t))"
+proof (induct t rule: rsplit0.induct)
+ case (2 a b)
+ let ?sa = "rsplit0 a" let ?sb = "rsplit0 b"
+ let ?ca = "fst ?sa" let ?cb = "fst ?sb"
+ let ?ta = "snd ?sa" let ?tb = "snd ?sb"
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 (snd(rsplit0 (Add a b)))"
+ by(cases "rsplit0 a",auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ have "Inum bs ((split (CN 0)) (rsplit0 (Add a b))) =
+ Inum bs ((split (CN 0)) ?sa)+Inum bs ((split (CN 0)) ?sb)"
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = Inum bs a + Inum bs b" using prems by (cases "rsplit0 a", simp_all)
+ finally show ?case using nb by simp
+qed(auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps , simp add: right_distrib[symmetric])
+
+ (* Linearize a formula*)
+definition
+ lt :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "lt c t = (if c = 0 then (Lt t) else if c > 0 then (Lt (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Gt (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition
+ le :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "le c t = (if c = 0 then (Le t) else if c > 0 then (Le (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Ge (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition
+ gt :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "gt c t = (if c = 0 then (Gt t) else if c > 0 then (Gt (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Lt (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition
+ ge :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "ge c t = (if c = 0 then (Ge t) else if c > 0 then (Ge (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Le (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition
+ eq :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "eq c t = (if c = 0 then (Eq t) else if c > 0 then (Eq (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Eq (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition
+ neq :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ "neq c t = (if c = 0 then (NEq t) else if c > 0 then (NEq (CN 0 c t))
+ else (NEq (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+lemma lt: "numnoabs t \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (split lt (rsplit0 t)) = Ifm bs (Lt t) \<and> isrlfm (split lt (rsplit0 t))"
+using rsplit0[where bs = "bs" and t="t"]
+by (auto simp add: lt_def split_def,cases "snd(rsplit0 t)",auto,case_tac "nat",auto)
+
+lemma le: "numnoabs t \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (split le (rsplit0 t)) = Ifm bs (Le t) \<and> isrlfm (split le (rsplit0 t))"
+using rsplit0[where bs = "bs" and t="t"]
+by (auto simp add: le_def split_def) (cases "snd(rsplit0 t)",auto,case_tac "nat",auto)
+
+lemma gt: "numnoabs t \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (split gt (rsplit0 t)) = Ifm bs (Gt t) \<and> isrlfm (split gt (rsplit0 t))"
+using rsplit0[where bs = "bs" and t="t"]
+by (auto simp add: gt_def split_def) (cases "snd(rsplit0 t)",auto,case_tac "nat",auto)
+
+lemma ge: "numnoabs t \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (split ge (rsplit0 t)) = Ifm bs (Ge t) \<and> isrlfm (split ge (rsplit0 t))"
+using rsplit0[where bs = "bs" and t="t"]
+by (auto simp add: ge_def split_def) (cases "snd(rsplit0 t)",auto,case_tac "nat",auto)
+
+lemma eq: "numnoabs t \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (split eq (rsplit0 t)) = Ifm bs (Eq t) \<and> isrlfm (split eq (rsplit0 t))"
+using rsplit0[where bs = "bs" and t="t"]
+by (auto simp add: eq_def split_def) (cases "snd(rsplit0 t)",auto,case_tac "nat",auto)
+
+lemma neq: "numnoabs t \<Longrightarrow> Ifm bs (split neq (rsplit0 t)) = Ifm bs (NEq t) \<and> isrlfm (split neq (rsplit0 t))"
+using rsplit0[where bs = "bs" and t="t"]
+by (auto simp add: neq_def split_def) (cases "snd(rsplit0 t)",auto,case_tac "nat",auto)
+
+lemma conj_lin: "isrlfm p \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm q \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm (conj p q)"
+by (auto simp add: conj_def)
+lemma disj_lin: "isrlfm p \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm q \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm (disj p q)"
+by (auto simp add: disj_def)
+
+consts rlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef rlfm "measure fmsize"
+ "rlfm (And p q) = conj (rlfm p) (rlfm q)"
+ "rlfm (Or p q) = disj (rlfm p) (rlfm q)"
+ "rlfm (Imp p q) = disj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm q)"
+ "rlfm (Iff p q) = disj (conj (rlfm p) (rlfm q)) (conj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm (NOT q)))"
+ "rlfm (Lt a) = split lt (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rlfm (Le a) = split le (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rlfm (Gt a) = split gt (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rlfm (Ge a) = split ge (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rlfm (Eq a) = split eq (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rlfm (NEq a) = split neq (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rlfm (NOT (And p q)) = disj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm (NOT q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Or p q)) = conj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm (NOT q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Imp p q)) = conj (rlfm p) (rlfm (NOT q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Iff p q)) = disj (conj(rlfm p) (rlfm(NOT q))) (conj(rlfm(NOT p)) (rlfm q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (NOT p)) = rlfm p"
+ "rlfm (NOT T) = F"
+ "rlfm (NOT F) = T"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Lt a)) = rlfm (Ge a)"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Le a)) = rlfm (Gt a)"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Gt a)) = rlfm (Le a)"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Ge a)) = rlfm (Lt a)"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Eq a)) = rlfm (NEq a)"
+ "rlfm (NOT (NEq a)) = rlfm (Eq a)"
+ "rlfm p = p" (hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+
+lemma rlfm_I:
+ assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "(Ifm bs (rlfm p) = Ifm bs p) \<and> isrlfm (rlfm p)"
+ using qfp
+by (induct p rule: rlfm.induct, auto simp add: lt le gt ge eq neq conj disj conj_lin disj_lin)
+
+ (* Operations needed for Ferrante and Rackoff *)
+lemma rminusinf_inf:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "\<exists> z. \<forall> x < z. Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> z. \<forall> x. ?P z x p")
+using lp
+proof (induct p rule: minusinf.induct)
+ case (1 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "min z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (2 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "min z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma rplusinf_inf:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "\<exists> z. \<forall> x > z. Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p) = Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> z. \<forall> x. ?P z x p")
+using lp
+proof (induct p rule: isrlfm.induct)
+ case (1 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "max z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (2 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "max z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma rminusinf_bound0:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "bound0 (minusinf p)"
+ using lp
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma rplusinf_bound0:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "bound0 (plusinf p)"
+ using lp
+ by (induct p rule: plusinf.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma rminusinf_ex:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and ex: "Ifm (a#bs) (minusinf p)"
+ shows "\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+proof-
+ from bound0_I [OF rminusinf_bound0[OF lp], where b="a" and bs ="bs"] ex
+ have th: "\<forall> x. Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p)" by auto
+ from rminusinf_inf[OF lp, where bs="bs"]
+ obtain z where z_def: "\<forall>x<z. Ifm (x # bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm (x # bs) p" by blast
+ from th have "Ifm ((z - 1)#bs) (minusinf p)" by simp
+ moreover have "z - 1 < z" by simp
+ ultimately show ?thesis using z_def by auto
+qed
+
+lemma rplusinf_ex:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and ex: "Ifm (a#bs) (plusinf p)"
+ shows "\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+proof-
+ from bound0_I [OF rplusinf_bound0[OF lp], where b="a" and bs ="bs"] ex
+ have th: "\<forall> x. Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p)" by auto
+ from rplusinf_inf[OF lp, where bs="bs"]
+ obtain z where z_def: "\<forall>x>z. Ifm (x # bs) (plusinf p) = Ifm (x # bs) p" by blast
+ from th have "Ifm ((z + 1)#bs) (plusinf p)" by simp
+ moreover have "z + 1 > z" by simp
+ ultimately show ?thesis using z_def by auto
+qed
+
+consts
+ uset:: "fm \<Rightarrow> (num \<times> int) list"
+ usubst :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (num \<times> int) \<Rightarrow> fm "
+recdef uset "measure size"
+ "uset (And p q) = (uset p @ uset q)"
+ "uset (Or p q) = (uset p @ uset q)"
+ "uset (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "uset (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "uset (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "uset (Le (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "uset (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "uset (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "uset p = []"
+recdef usubst "measure size"
+ "usubst (And p q) = (\<lambda> (t,n). And (usubst p (t,n)) (usubst q (t,n)))"
+ "usubst (Or p q) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Or (usubst p (t,n)) (usubst q (t,n)))"
+ "usubst (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Eq (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "usubst (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). NEq (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "usubst (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Lt (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "usubst (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Le (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "usubst (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Gt (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "usubst (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Ge (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "usubst p = (\<lambda> (t,n). p)"
+
+lemma usubst_I: assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and np: "real n > 0" and nbt: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "(Ifm (x#bs) (usubst p (t,n)) = Ifm (((Inum (x#bs) t)/(real n))#bs) p) \<and> bound0 (usubst p (t,n))" (is "(?I x (usubst p (t,n)) = ?I ?u p) \<and> ?B p" is "(_ = ?I (?t/?n) p) \<and> _" is "(_ = ?I (?N x t /_) p) \<and> _")
+ using lp
+proof(induct p rule: usubst.induct)
+ case (5 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) < 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) < 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) < 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (6 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) \<le> 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) \<le> 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) \<le> 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (7 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) > 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) > 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_less_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) > 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (8 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) \<ge> 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) \<ge> 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_le_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) \<ge> 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (3 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from np have np: "real n \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "?I ?u (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) = 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) = 0)"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) = 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (4 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from np have np: "real n \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "?I ?u (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) \<noteq> 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) \<noteq> 0)"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) \<noteq> 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+qed(simp_all add: nbt numbound0_I[where bs ="bs" and b="(Inum (x#bs) t)/ real n" and b'="x"] nth_pos2)
+
+lemma uset_l:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "\<forall> (t,k) \<in> set (uset p). numbound0 t \<and> k >0"
+using lp
+by(induct p rule: uset.induct,auto)
+
+lemma rminusinf_uset:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (minusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (?M p))")
+ and ex: "Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "?I x p")
+ shows "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). x \<ge> Inum (a#bs) s / real m" (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. x \<ge> ?N a s / real m")
+proof-
+ have "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). real m * x \<ge> Inum (a#bs) s " (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. real m *x \<ge> ?N a s")
+ using lp nmi ex
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto simp add:numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"] nth_pos2)
+ then obtain s m where smU: "(s,m) \<in> set (uset p)" and mx: "real m * x \<ge> ?N a s" by blast
+ from uset_l[OF lp] smU have mp: "real m > 0" by auto
+ from pos_divide_le_eq[OF mp, where a="x" and b="?N a s", symmetric] mx have "x \<ge> ?N a s / real m"
+ by (auto simp add: mult_commute)
+ thus ?thesis using smU by auto
+qed
+
+lemma rplusinf_uset:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (plusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (?M p))")
+ and ex: "Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "?I x p")
+ shows "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). x \<le> Inum (a#bs) s / real m" (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. x \<le> ?N a s / real m")
+proof-
+ have "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). real m * x \<le> Inum (a#bs) s " (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. real m *x \<le> ?N a s")
+ using lp nmi ex
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto simp add:numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"] nth_pos2)
+ then obtain s m where smU: "(s,m) \<in> set (uset p)" and mx: "real m * x \<le> ?N a s" by blast
+ from uset_l[OF lp] smU have mp: "real m > 0" by auto
+ from pos_le_divide_eq[OF mp, where a="x" and b="?N a s", symmetric] mx have "x \<le> ?N a s / real m"
+ by (auto simp add: mult_commute)
+ thus ?thesis using smU by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lin_dense:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and noS: "\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> (\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t / real n) ` set (uset p)"
+ (is "\<forall> t. _ \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> (\<lambda> (t,n). ?N x t / real n ) ` (?U p)")
+ and lx: "l < x" and xu:"x < u" and px:" Ifm (x#bs) p"
+ and ly: "l < y" and yu: "y < u"
+ shows "Ifm (y#bs) p"
+using lp px noS
+proof (induct p rule: isrlfm.induct)
+ case (5 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e < 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x < (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c < - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e < 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with yu have eu: "u > (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<le> l" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with lx pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp +
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e \<le> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x \<le> (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c < - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e < 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with yu have eu: "u > (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<le> l" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with lx pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x > (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_less_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c > - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_divide_less_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with ly have eu: "l < (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<ge> u" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with xu pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e \<ge> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x \<ge> (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_le_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c > - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_divide_less_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with ly have eu: "l < (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<ge> u" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with xu pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from cp have cnz: "real c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e = 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x = (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF cnz, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with lx xu have yne: "x \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ with pxc show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (4 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from cp have cnz: "real c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y* real c \<noteq> -?N x e"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF cnz, where a="y" and b="-?N x e"]) simp
+ hence "y* real c + ?N x e \<noteq> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ thus ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"]
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+qed (auto simp add: nth_pos2 numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="y" and b'="x"])
+
+lemma finite_set_intervals:
+ assumes px: "P (x::real)"
+ and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u"
+ and linS: "l\<in> S" and uinS: "u \<in> S"
+ and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
+ shows "\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x"
+proof-
+ let ?Mx = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> y \<le> x}"
+ let ?xM = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> x \<le> y}"
+ let ?a = "Max ?Mx"
+ let ?b = "Min ?xM"
+ have MxS: "?Mx \<subseteq> S" by blast
+ hence fMx: "finite ?Mx" using fS finite_subset by auto
+ from lx linS have linMx: "l \<in> ?Mx" by blast
+ hence Mxne: "?Mx \<noteq> {}" by blast
+ have xMS: "?xM \<subseteq> S" by blast
+ hence fxM: "finite ?xM" using fS finite_subset by auto
+ from xu uinS have linxM: "u \<in> ?xM" by blast
+ hence xMne: "?xM \<noteq> {}" by blast
+ have ax:"?a \<le> x" using Mxne fMx by auto
+ have xb:"x \<le> ?b" using xMne fxM by auto
+ have "?a \<in> ?Mx" using Max_in[OF fMx Mxne] by simp hence ainS: "?a \<in> S" using MxS by blast
+ have "?b \<in> ?xM" using Min_in[OF fxM xMne] by simp hence binS: "?b \<in> S" using xMS by blast
+ have noy:"\<forall> y. ?a < y \<and> y < ?b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix y
+ assume ay: "?a < y" and yb: "y < ?b" and yS: "y \<in> S"
+ from yS have "y\<in> ?Mx \<or> y\<in> ?xM" by auto
+ moreover {assume "y \<in> ?Mx" hence "y \<le> ?a" using Mxne fMx by auto with ay have "False" by simp}
+ moreover {assume "y \<in> ?xM" hence "y \<ge> ?b" using xMne fxM by auto with yb have "False" by simp}
+ ultimately show "False" by blast
+ qed
+ from ainS binS noy ax xb px show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma finite_set_intervals2:
+ assumes px: "P (x::real)"
+ and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u"
+ and linS: "l\<in> S" and uinS: "u \<in> S"
+ and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
+ shows "(\<exists> s\<in> S. P s) \<or> (\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a < x \<and> x < b \<and> P x)"
+proof-
+ from finite_set_intervals[where P="P", OF px lx xu linS uinS fS lS Su]
+ obtain a and b where
+ as: "a\<in> S" and bs: "b\<in> S" and noS:"\<forall>y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S" and axb: "a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x" by auto
+ from axb have "x= a \<or> x= b \<or> (a < x \<and> x < b)" by auto
+ thus ?thesis using px as bs noS by blast
+qed
+
+lemma rinf_uset:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (?M p))")
+ and npi: "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (?P p))")
+ and ex: "\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> x. ?I x p")
+ shows "\<exists> (l,n) \<in> set (uset p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). ?I ((Inum (x#bs) l / real n + Inum (x#bs) s / real m) / 2) p"
+proof-
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> x t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?U = "set (uset p)"
+ from ex obtain a where pa: "?I a p" by blast
+ from bound0_I[OF rminusinf_bound0[OF lp], where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="a"] nmi
+ have nmi': "\<not> (?I a (?M p))" by simp
+ from bound0_I[OF rplusinf_bound0[OF lp], where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="a"] npi
+ have npi': "\<not> (?I a (?P p))" by simp
+ have "\<exists> (l,n) \<in> set (uset p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). ?I ((?N a l/real n + ?N a s /real m) / 2) p"
+ proof-
+ let ?M = "(\<lambda> (t,c). ?N a t / real c) ` ?U"
+ have fM: "finite ?M" by auto
+ from rminusinf_uset[OF lp nmi pa] rplusinf_uset[OF lp npi pa]
+ have "\<exists> (l,n) \<in> set (uset p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). a \<le> ?N x l / real n \<and> a \<ge> ?N x s / real m" by blast
+ then obtain "t" "n" "s" "m" where
+ tnU: "(t,n) \<in> ?U" and smU: "(s,m) \<in> ?U"
+ and xs1: "a \<le> ?N x s / real m" and tx1: "a \<ge> ?N x t / real n" by blast
+ from uset_l[OF lp] tnU smU numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="a"] xs1 tx1 have xs: "a \<le> ?N a s / real m" and tx: "a \<ge> ?N a t / real n" by auto
+ from tnU have Mne: "?M \<noteq> {}" by auto
+ hence Une: "?U \<noteq> {}" by simp
+ let ?l = "Min ?M"
+ let ?u = "Max ?M"
+ have linM: "?l \<in> ?M" using fM Mne by simp
+ have uinM: "?u \<in> ?M" using fM Mne by simp
+ have tnM: "?N a t / real n \<in> ?M" using tnU by auto
+ have smM: "?N a s / real m \<in> ?M" using smU by auto
+ have lM: "\<forall> t\<in> ?M. ?l \<le> t" using Mne fM by auto
+ have Mu: "\<forall> t\<in> ?M. t \<le> ?u" using Mne fM by auto
+ have "?l \<le> ?N a t / real n" using tnM Mne by simp hence lx: "?l \<le> a" using tx by simp
+ have "?N a s / real m \<le> ?u" using smM Mne by simp hence xu: "a \<le> ?u" using xs by simp
+ from finite_set_intervals2[where P="\<lambda> x. ?I x p",OF pa lx xu linM uinM fM lM Mu]
+ have "(\<exists> s\<in> ?M. ?I s p) \<or>
+ (\<exists> t1\<in> ?M. \<exists> t2 \<in> ?M. (\<forall> y. t1 < y \<and> y < t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> ?M) \<and> t1 < a \<and> a < t2 \<and> ?I a p)" .
+ moreover { fix u assume um: "u\<in> ?M" and pu: "?I u p"
+ hence "\<exists> (tu,nu) \<in> ?U. u = ?N a tu / real nu" by auto
+ then obtain "tu" "nu" where tuU: "(tu,nu) \<in> ?U" and tuu:"u= ?N a tu / real nu" by blast
+ have "(u + u) / 2 = u" by auto with pu tuu
+ have "?I (((?N a tu / real nu) + (?N a tu / real nu)) / 2) p" by simp
+ with tuU have ?thesis by blast}
+ moreover{
+ assume "\<exists> t1\<in> ?M. \<exists> t2 \<in> ?M. (\<forall> y. t1 < y \<and> y < t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> ?M) \<and> t1 < a \<and> a < t2 \<and> ?I a p"
+ then obtain t1 and t2 where t1M: "t1 \<in> ?M" and t2M: "t2\<in> ?M"
+ and noM: "\<forall> y. t1 < y \<and> y < t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> ?M" and t1x: "t1 < a" and xt2: "a < t2" and px: "?I a p"
+ by blast
+ from t1M have "\<exists> (t1u,t1n) \<in> ?U. t1 = ?N a t1u / real t1n" by auto
+ then obtain "t1u" "t1n" where t1uU: "(t1u,t1n) \<in> ?U" and t1u: "t1 = ?N a t1u / real t1n" by blast
+ from t2M have "\<exists> (t2u,t2n) \<in> ?U. t2 = ?N a t2u / real t2n" by auto
+ then obtain "t2u" "t2n" where t2uU: "(t2u,t2n) \<in> ?U" and t2u: "t2 = ?N a t2u / real t2n" by blast
+ from t1x xt2 have t1t2: "t1 < t2" by simp
+ let ?u = "(t1 + t2) / 2"
+ from less_half_sum[OF t1t2] gt_half_sum[OF t1t2] have t1lu: "t1 < ?u" and ut2: "?u < t2" by auto
+ from lin_dense[OF lp noM t1x xt2 px t1lu ut2] have "?I ?u p" .
+ with t1uU t2uU t1u t2u have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+ then obtain "l" "n" "s" "m" where lnU: "(l,n) \<in> ?U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> ?U"
+ and pu: "?I ((?N a l / real n + ?N a s / real m) / 2) p" by blast
+ from lnU smU uset_l[OF lp] have nbl: "numbound0 l" and nbs: "numbound0 s" by auto
+ from numbound0_I[OF nbl, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nbs, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"] pu
+ have "?I ((?N x l / real n + ?N x s / real m) / 2) p" by simp
+ with lnU smU
+ show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+ (* The Ferrante - Rackoff Theorem *)
+
+theorem fr_eq:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p) = ((Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> set (uset p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (uset p). Ifm ((((Inum (x#bs) t)/ real n + (Inum (x#bs) s) / real m) /2)#bs) p))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x p) = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F)" is "?E = ?D")
+proof
+ assume px: "\<exists> x. ?I x p"
+ have "?M \<or> ?P \<or> (\<not> ?M \<and> \<not> ?P)" by blast
+ moreover {assume "?M \<or> ?P" hence "?D" by blast}
+ moreover {assume nmi: "\<not> ?M" and npi: "\<not> ?P"
+ from rinf_uset[OF lp nmi npi] have "?F" using px by blast hence "?D" by blast}
+ ultimately show "?D" by blast
+next
+ assume "?D"
+ moreover {assume m:"?M" from rminusinf_ex[OF lp m] have "?E" .}
+ moreover {assume p: "?P" from rplusinf_ex[OF lp p] have "?E" . }
+ moreover {assume f:"?F" hence "?E" by blast}
+ ultimately show "?E" by blast
+qed
+
+
+lemma fr_equsubst:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p) = ((Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> (t,k) \<in> set (uset p). \<exists> (s,l) \<in> set (uset p). Ifm (x#bs) (usubst p (Add(Mul l t) (Mul k s) , 2*k*l))))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x p) = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F)" is "?E = ?D")
+proof
+ assume px: "\<exists> x. ?I x p"
+ have "?M \<or> ?P \<or> (\<not> ?M \<and> \<not> ?P)" by blast
+ moreover {assume "?M \<or> ?P" hence "?D" by blast}
+ moreover {assume nmi: "\<not> ?M" and npi: "\<not> ?P"
+ let ?f ="\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t / real n"
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ {fix t n s m assume "(t,n)\<in> set (uset p)" and "(s,m) \<in> set (uset p)"
+ with uset_l[OF lp] have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np:"real n > 0" and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"real m > 0"
+ by auto
+ let ?st = "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute)
+ from tnb snb have st_nb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mnp mp np by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from usubst_I[OF lp mnp st_nb, where x="x" and bs="bs"]
+ have "?I x (usubst p (?st,2*n*m)) = ?I ((?N t / real n + ?N s / real m) /2) p" by (simp only: st[symmetric])}
+ with rinf_uset[OF lp nmi npi px] have "?F" by blast hence "?D" by blast}
+ ultimately show "?D" by blast
+next
+ assume "?D"
+ moreover {assume m:"?M" from rminusinf_ex[OF lp m] have "?E" .}
+ moreover {assume p: "?P" from rplusinf_ex[OF lp p] have "?E" . }
+ moreover {fix t k s l assume "(t,k) \<in> set (uset p)" and "(s,l) \<in> set (uset p)"
+ and px:"?I x (usubst p (Add (Mul l t) (Mul k s), 2*k*l))"
+ with uset_l[OF lp] have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np:"real k > 0" and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"real l > 0" by auto
+ let ?st = "Add (Mul l t) (Mul k s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*k*l) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute)
+ from tnb snb have st_nb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ from usubst_I[OF lp mnp st_nb, where bs="bs"] px have "?E" by auto}
+ ultimately show "?E" by blast
+qed
+
+
+ (* Implement the right hand side of Ferrante and Rackoff's Theorem. *)
+constdefs ferrack:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "ferrack p \<equiv> (let p' = rlfm (simpfm p); mp = minusinf p'; pp = plusinf p'
+ in if (mp = T \<or> pp = T) then T else
+ (let U = remdps(map simp_num_pair
+ (map (\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s) , 2*n*m))
+ (alluopairs (uset p'))))
+ in decr (disj mp (disj pp (evaldjf (simpfm o (usubst p')) U)))))"
+
+lemma uset_cong_aux:
+ assumes Ul: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set U. numbound0 t \<and> n >0"
+ shows "((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t /real n) ` (set (map (\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s) , 2*n*m)) (alluopairs U)))) = ((\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Inum (x#bs) t /real n + Inum (x#bs) s /real m)/2) ` (set U \<times> set U))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof(auto)
+ fix t n s m
+ assume "((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> set (alluopairs U)"
+ hence th: "((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> (set U \<times> set U)"
+ using alluopairs_set1[where xs="U"] by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from Ul th have mnz: "m \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ from Ul th have nnz: "n \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mnz nnz by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+
+ thus "(real m * Inum (x # bs) t + real n * Inum (x # bs) s) /
+ (2 * real n * real m)
+ \<in> (\<lambda>((t, n), s, m).
+ (Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m) / 2) `
+ (set U \<times> set U)"using mnz nnz th
+ apply (auto simp add: th add_divide_distrib algebra_simps split_def image_def)
+ by (rule_tac x="(s,m)" in bexI,simp_all)
+ (rule_tac x="(t,n)" in bexI,simp_all)
+next
+ fix t n s m
+ assume tnU: "(t,n) \<in> set U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> set U"
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from Ul smU have mnz: "m \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ from Ul tnU have nnz: "n \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mnz nnz by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ let ?P = "\<lambda> (t',n') (s',m'). (Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m)/2 = (Inum (x # bs) t' / real n' + Inum (x # bs) s' / real m')/2"
+ have Pc:"\<forall> a b. ?P a b = ?P b a"
+ by auto
+ from Ul alluopairs_set1 have Up:"\<forall> ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> set (alluopairs U). n \<noteq> 0 \<and> m \<noteq> 0" by blast
+ from alluopairs_ex[OF Pc, where xs="U"] tnU smU
+ have th':"\<exists> ((t',n'),(s',m')) \<in> set (alluopairs U). ?P (t',n') (s',m')"
+ by blast
+ then obtain t' n' s' m' where ts'_U: "((t',n'),(s',m')) \<in> set (alluopairs U)"
+ and Pts': "?P (t',n') (s',m')" by blast
+ from ts'_U Up have mnz': "m' \<noteq> 0" and nnz': "n'\<noteq> 0" by auto
+ let ?st' = "Add (Mul m' t') (Mul n' s')"
+ have st': "(?N t' / real n' + ?N s' / real m')/2 = ?N ?st' / real (2*n'*m')"
+ using mnz' nnz' by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from Pts' have
+ "(Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m)/2 = (Inum (x # bs) t' / real n' + Inum (x # bs) s' / real m')/2" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<lambda>(t, n). Inum (x # bs) t / real n) ((\<lambda>((t, n), s, m). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2 * n * m)) ((t',n'),(s',m'))))" by (simp add: st')
+ finally show "(Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m) / 2
+ \<in> (\<lambda>(t, n). Inum (x # bs) t / real n) `
+ (\<lambda>((t, n), s, m). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2 * n * m)) `
+ set (alluopairs U)"
+ using ts'_U by blast
+qed
+
+lemma uset_cong:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and UU': "((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t /real n) ` U') = ((\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Inum (x#bs) t /real n + Inum (x#bs) s /real m)/2) ` (U \<times> U))" (is "?f ` U' = ?g ` (U\<times>U)")
+ and U: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> U. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0"
+ and U': "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> U'. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> (t,n) \<in> U. \<exists> (s,m) \<in> U. Ifm (x#bs) (usubst p (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s),2*n*m))) = (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> U'. Ifm (x#bs) (usubst p (t,n)))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof
+ assume ?lhs
+ then obtain t n s m where tnU: "(t,n) \<in> U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> U" and
+ Pst: "Ifm (x#bs) (usubst p (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s),2*n*m))" by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ from tnU smU U have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "n > 0"
+ and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"m > 0" by auto
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult)
+ from tnb snb have stnb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mp np by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from tnU smU UU' have "?g ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> ?f ` U'" by blast
+ hence "\<exists> (t',n') \<in> U'. ?g ((t,n),(s,m)) = ?f (t',n')"
+ by auto (rule_tac x="(a,b)" in bexI, auto)
+ then obtain t' n' where tnU': "(t',n') \<in> U'" and th: "?g ((t,n),(s,m)) = ?f (t',n')" by blast
+ from U' tnU' have tnb': "numbound0 t'" and np': "real n' > 0" by auto
+ from usubst_I[OF lp mnp stnb, where bs="bs" and x="x"] Pst
+ have Pst2: "Ifm (Inum (x # bs) (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)) / real (2 * n * m) # bs) p" by simp
+ from conjunct1[OF usubst_I[OF lp np' tnb', where bs="bs" and x="x"], symmetric] th[simplified split_def fst_conv snd_conv,symmetric] Pst2[simplified st[symmetric]]
+ have "Ifm (x # bs) (usubst p (t', n')) " by (simp only: st)
+ then show ?rhs using tnU' by auto
+next
+ assume ?rhs
+ then obtain t' n' where tnU': "(t',n') \<in> U'" and Pt': "Ifm (x # bs) (usubst p (t', n'))"
+ by blast
+ from tnU' UU' have "?f (t',n') \<in> ?g ` (U\<times>U)" by blast
+ hence "\<exists> ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> (U\<times>U). ?f (t',n') = ?g ((t,n),(s,m))"
+ by auto (rule_tac x="(a,b)" in bexI, auto)
+ then obtain t n s m where tnU: "(t,n) \<in> U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> U" and
+ th: "?f (t',n') = ?g((t,n),(s,m)) "by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ from tnU smU U have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "n > 0"
+ and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"m > 0" by auto
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult)
+ from tnb snb have stnb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mp np by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from U' tnU' have tnb': "numbound0 t'" and np': "real n' > 0" by auto
+ from usubst_I[OF lp np' tnb', where bs="bs" and x="x",simplified th[simplified split_def fst_conv snd_conv] st] Pt'
+ have Pst2: "Ifm (Inum (x # bs) (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)) / real (2 * n * m) # bs) p" by simp
+ with usubst_I[OF lp mnp stnb, where x="x" and bs="bs"] tnU smU show ?lhs by blast
+qed
+
+lemma ferrack:
+ assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "qfree (ferrack p) \<and> ((Ifm bs (ferrack p)) = (\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p))"
+ (is "_ \<and> (?rhs = ?lhs)")
+proof-
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> x p. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+ fix x
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?q = "rlfm (simpfm p)"
+ let ?U = "uset ?q"
+ let ?Up = "alluopairs ?U"
+ let ?g = "\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s) , 2*n*m)"
+ let ?S = "map ?g ?Up"
+ let ?SS = "map simp_num_pair ?S"
+ let ?Y = "remdps ?SS"
+ let ?f= "(\<lambda> (t,n). ?N t / real n)"
+ let ?h = "\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (?N t/real n + ?N s/ real m) /2"
+ let ?F = "\<lambda> p. \<exists> a \<in> set (uset p). \<exists> b \<in> set (uset p). ?I x (usubst p (?g(a,b)))"
+ let ?ep = "evaldjf (simpfm o (usubst ?q)) ?Y"
+ from rlfm_I[OF simpfm_qf[OF qf]] have lq: "isrlfm ?q" by blast
+ from alluopairs_set1[where xs="?U"] have UpU: "set ?Up \<le> (set ?U \<times> set ?U)" by simp
+ from uset_l[OF lq] have U_l: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?U. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0" .
+ from U_l UpU
+ have "\<forall> ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> set ?Up. numbound0 t \<and> n> 0 \<and> numbound0 s \<and> m > 0" by auto
+ hence Snb: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?S. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0 "
+ by (auto simp add: mult_pos_pos)
+ have Y_l: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?Y. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0"
+ proof-
+ { fix t n assume tnY: "(t,n) \<in> set ?Y"
+ hence "(t,n) \<in> set ?SS" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (t',n') \<in> set ?S. simp_num_pair (t',n') = (t,n)"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def) (rule_tac x="((aa,ba),(ab,bb))" in bexI, simp_all)
+ then obtain t' n' where tn'S: "(t',n') \<in> set ?S" and tns: "simp_num_pair (t',n') = (t,n)" by blast
+ from tn'S Snb have tnb: "numbound0 t'" and np: "n' > 0" by auto
+ from simp_num_pair_l[OF tnb np tns]
+ have "numbound0 t \<and> n > 0" . }
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+
+ have YU: "(?f ` set ?Y) = (?h ` (set ?U \<times> set ?U))"
+ proof-
+ from simp_num_pair_ci[where bs="x#bs"] have
+ "\<forall>x. (?f o simp_num_pair) x = ?f x" by auto
+ hence th: "?f o simp_num_pair = ?f" using ext by blast
+ have "(?f ` set ?Y) = ((?f o simp_num_pair) ` set ?S)" by (simp add: image_compose)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?f ` set ?S)" by (simp add: th)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((?f o ?g) ` set ?Up)"
+ by (simp only: set_map o_def image_compose[symmetric])
+ also have "\<dots> = (?h ` (set ?U \<times> set ?U))"
+ using uset_cong_aux[OF U_l, where x="x" and bs="bs", simplified set_map image_compose[symmetric]] by blast
+ finally show ?thesis .
+ qed
+ have "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?Y. bound0 (simpfm (usubst ?q (t,n)))"
+ proof-
+ { fix t n assume tnY: "(t,n) \<in> set ?Y"
+ with Y_l have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "real n > 0" by auto
+ from usubst_I[OF lq np tnb]
+ have "bound0 (usubst ?q (t,n))" by simp hence "bound0 (simpfm (usubst ?q (t,n)))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by simp}
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+ hence ep_nb: "bound0 ?ep" using evaldjf_bound0[where xs="?Y" and f="simpfm o (usubst ?q)"] by auto
+ let ?mp = "minusinf ?q"
+ let ?pp = "plusinf ?q"
+ let ?M = "?I x ?mp"
+ let ?P = "?I x ?pp"
+ let ?res = "disj ?mp (disj ?pp ?ep)"
+ from rminusinf_bound0[OF lq] rplusinf_bound0[OF lq] ep_nb
+ have nbth: "bound0 ?res" by auto
+
+ from conjunct1[OF rlfm_I[OF simpfm_qf[OF qf]]] simpfm
+
+ have th: "?lhs = (\<exists> x. ?I x ?q)" by auto
+ from th fr_equsubst[OF lq, where bs="bs" and x="x"] have lhfr: "?lhs = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F ?q)"
+ by (simp only: split_def fst_conv snd_conv)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> set ?Y. ?I x (simpfm (usubst ?q (t,n)))))"
+ using uset_cong[OF lq YU U_l Y_l] by (simp only: split_def fst_conv snd_conv simpfm)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm (x#bs) ?res)"
+ using evaldjf_ex[where ps="?Y" and bs = "x#bs" and f="simpfm o (usubst ?q)",symmetric]
+ by (simp add: split_def pair_collapse)
+ finally have lheq: "?lhs = (Ifm bs (decr ?res))" using decr[OF nbth] by blast
+ hence lr: "?lhs = ?rhs" apply (unfold ferrack_def Let_def)
+ by (cases "?mp = T \<or> ?pp = T", auto) (simp add: disj_def)+
+ from decr_qf[OF nbth] have "qfree (ferrack p)" by (auto simp add: Let_def ferrack_def)
+ with lr show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+definition linrqe:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "linrqe p = qelim (prep p) ferrack"
+
+theorem linrqe: "Ifm bs (linrqe p) = Ifm bs p \<and> qfree (linrqe p)"
+using ferrack qelim_ci prep
+unfolding linrqe_def by auto
+
+definition ferrack_test :: "unit \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "ferrack_test u = linrqe (A (A (Imp (Lt (Sub (Bound 1) (Bound 0)))
+ (E (Eq (Sub (Add (Bound 0) (Bound 2)) (Bound 1)))))))"
+
+ML {* @{code ferrack_test} () *}
+
+oracle linr_oracle = {*
+let
+
+fun num_of_term vs (t as Free (xn, xT)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) vs t
+ of NONE => error "Variable not found in the list!"
+ | SOME n => @{code Bound} n)
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "real (0::int)"} = @{code C} 0
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "real (1::int)"} = @{code C} 1
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "0::real"} = @{code C} 0
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "1::real"} = @{code C} 1
+ | num_of_term vs (Bound i) = @{code Bound} i
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "uminus :: real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t') = @{code Neg} (num_of_term vs t')
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op + :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Add} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op - :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op * :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t1 $ t2) = (case (num_of_term vs t1)
+ of @{code C} i => @{code Mul} (i, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | _ => error "num_of_term: unsupported Multiplication")
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "number_of :: int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t')) = @{code C} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t')
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "number_of :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t') = @{code C} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t')
+ | num_of_term vs t = error ("num_of_term: unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term @{context} t);
+
+fun fm_of_term vs @{term True} = @{code T}
+ | fm_of_term vs @{term False} = @{code F}
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op < :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Lt} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op \<le> :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Le} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op = :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Eq} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op \<longleftrightarrow> :: bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Iff} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op &"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code And} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op |"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Or} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op -->"} $ t1 $ t2) = @{code Imp} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "Not"} $ t') = @{code NOT} (fm_of_term vs t')
+ | fm_of_term vs (Const ("Ex", _) $ Abs (xn, xT, p)) =
+ @{code E} (fm_of_term (map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs) p)
+ | fm_of_term vs (Const ("All", _) $ Abs (xn, xT, p)) =
+ @{code A} (fm_of_term (map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs) p)
+ | fm_of_term vs t = error ("fm_of_term : unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term @{context} t);
+
+fun term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) = @{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ HOLogic.mk_number HOLogic.intT i
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Bound} n) = fst (the (find_first (fn (_, m) => n = m) vs))
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Neg} t') = @{term "uminus :: real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ term_of_num vs t'
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op + :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $
+ term_of_num vs t1 $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Sub} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op - :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $
+ term_of_num vs t1 $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Mul} (i, t2)) = @{term "op * :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $
+ term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code CN} (n, i, t)) = term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (@{code Mul} (i, @{code Bound} n), t));
+
+fun term_of_fm vs @{code T} = HOLogic.true_const
+ | term_of_fm vs @{code F} = HOLogic.false_const
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Lt} t) = @{term "op < :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $
+ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::real"}
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Le} t) = @{term "op \<le> :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $
+ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::real"}
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Gt} t) = @{term "op < :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $
+ @{term "0::real"} $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Ge} t) = @{term "op \<le> :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $
+ @{term "0::real"} $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Eq} t) = @{term "op = :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $
+ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::real"}
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code NEq} t) = term_of_fm vs (@{code NOT} (@{code Eq} t))
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code NOT} t') = HOLogic.Not $ term_of_fm vs t'
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code And} (t1, t2)) = HOLogic.conj $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Or} (t1, t2)) = HOLogic.disj $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Imp} (t1, t2)) = HOLogic.imp $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Iff} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op \<longleftrightarrow> :: bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"} $
+ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs _ = error "If this is raised, Isabelle/HOL or generate_code is inconsistent.";
+
+in fn ct =>
+ let
+ val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct;
+ val t = Thm.term_of ct;
+ val fs = OldTerm.term_frees t;
+ val vs = fs ~~ (0 upto (length fs - 1));
+ val res = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (t, term_of_fm vs (@{code linrqe} (fm_of_term vs t))));
+ in Thm.cterm_of thy res end
+end;
+*}
+
+use "ferrack_tac.ML"
+setup Ferrack_Tac.setup
+
+lemma
+ fixes x :: real
+ shows "2 * x \<le> 2 * x \<and> 2 * x \<le> 2 * x + 1"
+apply rferrack
+done
+
+lemma
+ fixes x :: real
+ shows "\<exists>y \<le> x. x = y + 1"
+apply rferrack
+done
+
+lemma
+ fixes x :: real
+ shows "\<not> (\<exists>z. x + z = x + z + 1)"
+apply rferrack
+done
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/MIR.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,5933 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/MIR.thy
+ Author: Amine Chaieb
+*)
+
+theory MIR
+imports Complex_Main Dense_Linear_Order Efficient_Nat
+uses ("mir_tac.ML")
+begin
+
+section {* Quantifier elimination for @{text "\<real> (0, 1, +, floor, <)"} *}
+
+declare real_of_int_floor_cancel [simp del]
+
+primrec alluopairs:: "'a list \<Rightarrow> ('a \<times> 'a) list" where
+ "alluopairs [] = []"
+| "alluopairs (x#xs) = (map (Pair x) (x#xs))@(alluopairs xs)"
+
+lemma alluopairs_set1: "set (alluopairs xs) \<le> {(x,y). x\<in> set xs \<and> y\<in> set xs}"
+by (induct xs, auto)
+
+lemma alluopairs_set:
+ "\<lbrakk>x\<in> set xs ; y \<in> set xs\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x,y) \<in> set (alluopairs xs) \<or> (y,x) \<in> set (alluopairs xs) "
+by (induct xs, auto)
+
+lemma alluopairs_ex:
+ assumes Pc: "\<forall> x y. P x y = P y x"
+ shows "(\<exists> x \<in> set xs. \<exists> y \<in> set xs. P x y) = (\<exists> (x,y) \<in> set (alluopairs xs). P x y)"
+proof
+ assume "\<exists>x\<in>set xs. \<exists>y\<in>set xs. P x y"
+ then obtain x y where x: "x \<in> set xs" and y:"y \<in> set xs" and P: "P x y" by blast
+ from alluopairs_set[OF x y] P Pc show"\<exists>(x, y)\<in>set (alluopairs xs). P x y"
+ by auto
+next
+ assume "\<exists>(x, y)\<in>set (alluopairs xs). P x y"
+ then obtain "x" and "y" where xy:"(x,y) \<in> set (alluopairs xs)" and P: "P x y" by blast+
+ from xy have "x \<in> set xs \<and> y\<in> set xs" using alluopairs_set1 by blast
+ with P show "\<exists>x\<in>set xs. \<exists>y\<in>set xs. P x y" by blast
+qed
+
+ (* generate a list from i to j*)
+consts iupt :: "int \<times> int \<Rightarrow> int list"
+recdef iupt "measure (\<lambda> (i,j). nat (j-i +1))"
+ "iupt (i,j) = (if j <i then [] else (i# iupt(i+1, j)))"
+
+lemma iupt_set: "set (iupt(i,j)) = {i .. j}"
+proof(induct rule: iupt.induct)
+ case (1 a b)
+ show ?case
+ using prems by (simp add: simp_from_to)
+qed
+
+lemma nth_pos2: "0 < n \<Longrightarrow> (x#xs) ! n = xs ! (n - 1)"
+using Nat.gr0_conv_Suc
+by clarsimp
+
+
+lemma myl: "\<forall> (a::'a::{pordered_ab_group_add}) (b::'a). (a \<le> b) = (0 \<le> b - a)"
+proof(clarify)
+ fix x y ::"'a"
+ have "(x \<le> y) = (x - y \<le> 0)" by (simp only: le_iff_diff_le_0[where a="x" and b="y"])
+ also have "\<dots> = (- (y - x) \<le> 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (0 \<le> y - x)" by (simp only: neg_le_0_iff_le[where a="y-x"])
+ finally show "(x \<le> y) = (0 \<le> y - x)" .
+qed
+
+lemma myless: "\<forall> (a::'a::{pordered_ab_group_add}) (b::'a). (a < b) = (0 < b - a)"
+proof(clarify)
+ fix x y ::"'a"
+ have "(x < y) = (x - y < 0)" by (simp only: less_iff_diff_less_0[where a="x" and b="y"])
+ also have "\<dots> = (- (y - x) < 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (0 < y - x)" by (simp only: neg_less_0_iff_less[where a="y-x"])
+ finally show "(x < y) = (0 < y - x)" .
+qed
+
+lemma myeq: "\<forall> (a::'a::{pordered_ab_group_add}) (b::'a). (a = b) = (0 = b - a)"
+ by auto
+
+ (* Maybe should be added to the library \<dots> *)
+lemma floor_int_eq: "(real n\<le> x \<and> x < real (n+1)) = (floor x = n)"
+proof( auto)
+ assume lb: "real n \<le> x"
+ and ub: "x < real n + 1"
+ have "real (floor x) \<le> x" by simp
+ hence "real (floor x) < real (n + 1) " using ub by arith
+ hence "floor x < n+1" by simp
+ moreover from lb have "n \<le> floor x" using floor_mono2[where x="real n" and y="x"]
+ by simp ultimately show "floor x = n" by simp
+qed
+
+(* Periodicity of dvd *)
+lemma dvd_period:
+ assumes advdd: "(a::int) dvd d"
+ shows "(a dvd (x + t)) = (a dvd ((x+ c*d) + t))"
+ using advdd
+proof-
+ {fix x k
+ from inf_period(3)[OF advdd, rule_format, where x=x and k="-k"]
+ have " ((a::int) dvd (x + t)) = (a dvd (x+k*d + t))" by simp}
+ hence "\<forall>x.\<forall>k. ((a::int) dvd (x + t)) = (a dvd (x+k*d + t))" by simp
+ then show ?thesis by simp
+qed
+
+ (* The Divisibility relation between reals *)
+definition
+ rdvd:: "real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool" (infixl "rdvd" 50)
+where
+ rdvd_def: "x rdvd y \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k\<Colon>int. y = x * real k)"
+
+lemma int_rdvd_real:
+ shows "real (i::int) rdvd x = (i dvd (floor x) \<and> real (floor x) = x)" (is "?l = ?r")
+proof
+ assume "?l"
+ hence th: "\<exists> k. x=real (i*k)" by (simp add: rdvd_def)
+ hence th': "real (floor x) = x" by (auto simp del: real_of_int_mult)
+ with th have "\<exists> k. real (floor x) = real (i*k)" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> k. floor x = i*k" by (simp only: real_of_int_inject)
+ thus ?r using th' by (simp add: dvd_def)
+next
+ assume "?r" hence "(i\<Colon>int) dvd \<lfloor>x\<Colon>real\<rfloor>" ..
+ hence "\<exists> k. real (floor x) = real (i*k)"
+ by (simp only: real_of_int_inject) (simp add: dvd_def)
+ thus ?l using prems by (simp add: rdvd_def)
+qed
+
+lemma int_rdvd_iff: "(real (i::int) rdvd real t) = (i dvd t)"
+by (auto simp add: rdvd_def dvd_def) (rule_tac x="k" in exI, simp only :real_of_int_mult[symmetric])
+
+
+lemma rdvd_abs1:
+ "(abs (real d) rdvd t) = (real (d ::int) rdvd t)"
+proof
+ assume d: "real d rdvd t"
+ from d int_rdvd_real have d2: "d dvd (floor t)" and ti: "real (floor t) = t" by auto
+
+ from iffD2[OF zdvd_abs1] d2 have "(abs d) dvd (floor t)" by blast
+ with ti int_rdvd_real[symmetric] have "real (abs d) rdvd t" by blast
+ thus "abs (real d) rdvd t" by simp
+next
+ assume "abs (real d) rdvd t" hence "real (abs d) rdvd t" by simp
+ with int_rdvd_real[where i="abs d" and x="t"] have d2: "abs d dvd floor t" and ti: "real (floor t) =t" by auto
+ from iffD1[OF zdvd_abs1] d2 have "d dvd floor t" by blast
+ with ti int_rdvd_real[symmetric] show "real d rdvd t" by blast
+qed
+
+lemma rdvd_minus: "(real (d::int) rdvd t) = (real d rdvd -t)"
+ apply (auto simp add: rdvd_def)
+ apply (rule_tac x="-k" in exI, simp)
+ apply (rule_tac x="-k" in exI, simp)
+done
+
+lemma rdvd_left_0_eq: "(0 rdvd t) = (t=0)"
+by (auto simp add: rdvd_def)
+
+lemma rdvd_mult:
+ assumes knz: "k\<noteq>0"
+ shows "(real (n::int) * real (k::int) rdvd x * real k) = (real n rdvd x)"
+using knz by (simp add:rdvd_def)
+
+lemma rdvd_trans: assumes mn:"m rdvd n" and nk:"n rdvd k"
+ shows "m rdvd k"
+proof-
+ from rdvd_def mn obtain c where nmc:"n = m * real (c::int)" by auto
+ from rdvd_def nk obtain c' where nkc:"k = n * real (c'::int)" by auto
+ hence "k = m * real (c * c')" using nmc by simp
+ thus ?thesis using rdvd_def by blast
+qed
+
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+ (**** SHADOW SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS ****)
+ (*********************************************************************************)
+
+datatype num = C int | Bound nat | CN nat int num | Neg num | Add num num| Sub num num
+ | Mul int num | Floor num| CF int num num
+
+ (* A size for num to make inductive proofs simpler*)
+primrec num_size :: "num \<Rightarrow> nat" where
+ "num_size (C c) = 1"
+| "num_size (Bound n) = 1"
+| "num_size (Neg a) = 1 + num_size a"
+| "num_size (Add a b) = 1 + num_size a + num_size b"
+| "num_size (Sub a b) = 3 + num_size a + num_size b"
+| "num_size (CN n c a) = 4 + num_size a "
+| "num_size (CF c a b) = 4 + num_size a + num_size b"
+| "num_size (Mul c a) = 1 + num_size a"
+| "num_size (Floor a) = 1 + num_size a"
+
+ (* Semantics of numeral terms (num) *)
+primrec Inum :: "real list \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> real" where
+ "Inum bs (C c) = (real c)"
+| "Inum bs (Bound n) = bs!n"
+| "Inum bs (CN n c a) = (real c) * (bs!n) + (Inum bs a)"
+| "Inum bs (Neg a) = -(Inum bs a)"
+| "Inum bs (Add a b) = Inum bs a + Inum bs b"
+| "Inum bs (Sub a b) = Inum bs a - Inum bs b"
+| "Inum bs (Mul c a) = (real c) * Inum bs a"
+| "Inum bs (Floor a) = real (floor (Inum bs a))"
+| "Inum bs (CF c a b) = real c * real (floor (Inum bs a)) + Inum bs b"
+definition "isint t bs \<equiv> real (floor (Inum bs t)) = Inum bs t"
+
+lemma isint_iff: "isint n bs = (real (floor (Inum bs n)) = Inum bs n)"
+by (simp add: isint_def)
+
+lemma isint_Floor: "isint (Floor n) bs"
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+
+lemma isint_Mul: "isint e bs \<Longrightarrow> isint (Mul c e) bs"
+proof-
+ let ?e = "Inum bs e"
+ let ?fe = "floor ?e"
+ assume be: "isint e bs" hence efe:"real ?fe = ?e" by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ have "real ((floor (Inum bs (Mul c e)))) = real (floor (real (c * ?fe)))" using efe by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (c* ?fe)" by (simp only: floor_real_of_int)
+ also have "\<dots> = real c * ?e" using efe by simp
+ finally show ?thesis using isint_iff by simp
+qed
+
+lemma isint_neg: "isint e bs \<Longrightarrow> isint (Neg e) bs"
+proof-
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> t. Inum bs t"
+ assume ie: "isint e bs"
+ hence th: "real (floor (?I e)) = ?I e" by (simp add: isint_def)
+ have "real (floor (?I (Neg e))) = real (floor (- (real (floor (?I e)))))" by (simp add: th)
+ also have "\<dots> = - real (floor (?I e))" by(simp add: floor_minus_real_of_int)
+ finally show "isint (Neg e) bs" by (simp add: isint_def th)
+qed
+
+lemma isint_sub:
+ assumes ie: "isint e bs" shows "isint (Sub (C c) e) bs"
+proof-
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> t. Inum bs t"
+ from ie have th: "real (floor (?I e)) = ?I e" by (simp add: isint_def)
+ have "real (floor (?I (Sub (C c) e))) = real (floor ((real (c -floor (?I e)))))" by (simp add: th)
+ also have "\<dots> = real (c- floor (?I e))" by(simp add: floor_minus_real_of_int)
+ finally show "isint (Sub (C c) e) bs" by (simp add: isint_def th)
+qed
+
+lemma isint_add: assumes
+ ai:"isint a bs" and bi: "isint b bs" shows "isint (Add a b) bs"
+proof-
+ let ?a = "Inum bs a"
+ let ?b = "Inum bs b"
+ from ai bi isint_iff have "real (floor (?a + ?b)) = real (floor (real (floor ?a) + real (floor ?b)))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (floor ?a) + real (floor ?b)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ?a + ?b" using ai bi isint_iff by simp
+ finally show "isint (Add a b) bs" by (simp add: isint_iff)
+qed
+
+lemma isint_c: "isint (C j) bs"
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+
+
+ (* FORMULAE *)
+datatype fm =
+ T| F| Lt num| Le num| Gt num| Ge num| Eq num| NEq num| Dvd int num| NDvd int num|
+ NOT fm| And fm fm| Or fm fm| Imp fm fm| Iff fm fm| E fm| A fm
+
+
+ (* A size for fm *)
+fun fmsize :: "fm \<Rightarrow> nat" where
+ "fmsize (NOT p) = 1 + fmsize p"
+| "fmsize (And p q) = 1 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+| "fmsize (Or p q) = 1 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+| "fmsize (Imp p q) = 3 + fmsize p + fmsize q"
+| "fmsize (Iff p q) = 3 + 2*(fmsize p + fmsize q)"
+| "fmsize (E p) = 1 + fmsize p"
+| "fmsize (A p) = 4+ fmsize p"
+| "fmsize (Dvd i t) = 2"
+| "fmsize (NDvd i t) = 2"
+| "fmsize p = 1"
+ (* several lemmas about fmsize *)
+lemma fmsize_pos: "fmsize p > 0"
+by (induct p rule: fmsize.induct) simp_all
+
+ (* Semantics of formulae (fm) *)
+primrec Ifm ::"real list \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> bool" where
+ "Ifm bs T = True"
+| "Ifm bs F = False"
+| "Ifm bs (Lt a) = (Inum bs a < 0)"
+| "Ifm bs (Gt a) = (Inum bs a > 0)"
+| "Ifm bs (Le a) = (Inum bs a \<le> 0)"
+| "Ifm bs (Ge a) = (Inum bs a \<ge> 0)"
+| "Ifm bs (Eq a) = (Inum bs a = 0)"
+| "Ifm bs (NEq a) = (Inum bs a \<noteq> 0)"
+| "Ifm bs (Dvd i b) = (real i rdvd Inum bs b)"
+| "Ifm bs (NDvd i b) = (\<not>(real i rdvd Inum bs b))"
+| "Ifm bs (NOT p) = (\<not> (Ifm bs p))"
+| "Ifm bs (And p q) = (Ifm bs p \<and> Ifm bs q)"
+| "Ifm bs (Or p q) = (Ifm bs p \<or> Ifm bs q)"
+| "Ifm bs (Imp p q) = ((Ifm bs p) \<longrightarrow> (Ifm bs q))"
+| "Ifm bs (Iff p q) = (Ifm bs p = Ifm bs q)"
+| "Ifm bs (E p) = (\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p)"
+| "Ifm bs (A p) = (\<forall> x. Ifm (x#bs) p)"
+
+consts prep :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef prep "measure fmsize"
+ "prep (E T) = T"
+ "prep (E F) = F"
+ "prep (E (Or p q)) = Or (prep (E p)) (prep (E q))"
+ "prep (E (Imp p q)) = Or (prep (E (NOT p))) (prep (E q))"
+ "prep (E (Iff p q)) = Or (prep (E (And p q))) (prep (E (And (NOT p) (NOT q))))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (And p q))) = Or (prep (E (NOT p))) (prep (E(NOT q)))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (Imp p q))) = prep (E (And p (NOT q)))"
+ "prep (E (NOT (Iff p q))) = Or (prep (E (And p (NOT q)))) (prep (E(And (NOT p) q)))"
+ "prep (E p) = E (prep p)"
+ "prep (A (And p q)) = And (prep (A p)) (prep (A q))"
+ "prep (A p) = prep (NOT (E (NOT p)))"
+ "prep (NOT (NOT p)) = prep p"
+ "prep (NOT (And p q)) = Or (prep (NOT p)) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (A p)) = prep (E (NOT p))"
+ "prep (NOT (Or p q)) = And (prep (NOT p)) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (Imp p q)) = And (prep p) (prep (NOT q))"
+ "prep (NOT (Iff p q)) = Or (prep (And p (NOT q))) (prep (And (NOT p) q))"
+ "prep (NOT p) = NOT (prep p)"
+ "prep (Or p q) = Or (prep p) (prep q)"
+ "prep (And p q) = And (prep p) (prep q)"
+ "prep (Imp p q) = prep (Or (NOT p) q)"
+ "prep (Iff p q) = Or (prep (And p q)) (prep (And (NOT p) (NOT q)))"
+ "prep p = p"
+(hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+lemma prep: "\<And> bs. Ifm bs (prep p) = Ifm bs p"
+by (induct p rule: prep.induct, auto)
+
+
+ (* Quantifier freeness *)
+fun qfree:: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" where
+ "qfree (E p) = False"
+ | "qfree (A p) = False"
+ | "qfree (NOT p) = qfree p"
+ | "qfree (And p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ | "qfree (Or p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ | "qfree (Imp p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ | "qfree (Iff p q) = (qfree p \<and> qfree q)"
+ | "qfree p = True"
+
+ (* Boundedness and substitution *)
+primrec numbound0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> bool" (* a num is INDEPENDENT of Bound 0 *) where
+ "numbound0 (C c) = True"
+ | "numbound0 (Bound n) = (n>0)"
+ | "numbound0 (CN n i a) = (n > 0 \<and> numbound0 a)"
+ | "numbound0 (Neg a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "numbound0 (Add a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+ | "numbound0 (Sub a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+ | "numbound0 (Mul i a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "numbound0 (Floor a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "numbound0 (CF c a b) = (numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b)"
+
+lemma numbound0_I:
+ assumes nb: "numbound0 a"
+ shows "Inum (b#bs) a = Inum (b'#bs) a"
+ using nb by (induct a) (auto simp add: nth_pos2)
+
+lemma numbound0_gen:
+ assumes nb: "numbound0 t" and ti: "isint t (x#bs)"
+ shows "\<forall> y. isint t (y#bs)"
+using nb ti
+proof(clarify)
+ fix y
+ from numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="y" and b'="x"] ti[simplified isint_def]
+ show "isint t (y#bs)"
+ by (simp add: isint_def)
+qed
+
+primrec bound0:: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* A Formula is independent of Bound 0 *) where
+ "bound0 T = True"
+ | "bound0 F = True"
+ | "bound0 (Lt a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (Le a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (Gt a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (Ge a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (Eq a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (NEq a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (Dvd i a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (NDvd i a) = numbound0 a"
+ | "bound0 (NOT p) = bound0 p"
+ | "bound0 (And p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ | "bound0 (Or p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ | "bound0 (Imp p q) = ((bound0 p) \<and> (bound0 q))"
+ | "bound0 (Iff p q) = (bound0 p \<and> bound0 q)"
+ | "bound0 (E p) = False"
+ | "bound0 (A p) = False"
+
+lemma bound0_I:
+ assumes bp: "bound0 p"
+ shows "Ifm (b#bs) p = Ifm (b'#bs) p"
+ using bp numbound0_I [where b="b" and bs="bs" and b'="b'"]
+ by (induct p) (auto simp add: nth_pos2)
+
+primrec numsubst0:: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num" (* substitute a num into a num for Bound 0 *) where
+ "numsubst0 t (C c) = (C c)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (Bound n) = (if n=0 then t else Bound n)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (CN n i a) = (if n=0 then Add (Mul i t) (numsubst0 t a) else CN n i (numsubst0 t a))"
+ | "numsubst0 t (CF i a b) = CF i (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (Neg a) = Neg (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (Add a b) = Add (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (Sub a b) = Sub (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (Mul i a) = Mul i (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "numsubst0 t (Floor a) = Floor (numsubst0 t a)"
+
+lemma numsubst0_I:
+ shows "Inum (b#bs) (numsubst0 a t) = Inum ((Inum (b#bs) a)#bs) t"
+ by (induct t) (simp_all add: nth_pos2)
+
+lemma numsubst0_I':
+ assumes nb: "numbound0 a"
+ shows "Inum (b#bs) (numsubst0 a t) = Inum ((Inum (b'#bs) a)#bs) t"
+ by (induct t) (simp_all add: nth_pos2 numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="b" and b'="b'"])
+
+primrec subst0:: "num \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* substitue a num into a formula for Bound 0 *) where
+ "subst0 t T = T"
+ | "subst0 t F = F"
+ | "subst0 t (Lt a) = Lt (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (Le a) = Le (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (Gt a) = Gt (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (Ge a) = Ge (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (Eq a) = Eq (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (NEq a) = NEq (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (numsubst0 t a)"
+ | "subst0 t (NOT p) = NOT (subst0 t p)"
+ | "subst0 t (And p q) = And (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ | "subst0 t (Or p q) = Or (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ | "subst0 t (Imp p q) = Imp (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+ | "subst0 t (Iff p q) = Iff (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
+
+lemma subst0_I: assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "Ifm (b#bs) (subst0 a p) = Ifm ((Inum (b#bs) a)#bs) p"
+ using qfp numsubst0_I[where b="b" and bs="bs" and a="a"]
+ by (induct p) (simp_all add: nth_pos2 )
+
+consts
+ decrnum:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ decr :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+
+recdef decrnum "measure size"
+ "decrnum (Bound n) = Bound (n - 1)"
+ "decrnum (Neg a) = Neg (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (Add a b) = Add (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum (Sub a b) = Sub (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum (Mul c a) = Mul c (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (Floor a) = Floor (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (CN n c a) = CN (n - 1) c (decrnum a)"
+ "decrnum (CF c a b) = CF c (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
+ "decrnum a = a"
+
+recdef decr "measure size"
+ "decr (Lt a) = Lt (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Le a) = Le (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Gt a) = Gt (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Ge a) = Ge (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Eq a) = Eq (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NEq a) = NEq (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (decrnum a)"
+ "decr (NOT p) = NOT (decr p)"
+ "decr (And p q) = And (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Or p q) = Or (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Imp p q) = Imp (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr (Iff p q) = Iff (decr p) (decr q)"
+ "decr p = p"
+
+lemma decrnum: assumes nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "Inum (x#bs) t = Inum bs (decrnum t)"
+ using nb by (induct t rule: decrnum.induct, simp_all add: nth_pos2)
+
+lemma decr: assumes nb: "bound0 p"
+ shows "Ifm (x#bs) p = Ifm bs (decr p)"
+ using nb
+ by (induct p rule: decr.induct, simp_all add: nth_pos2 decrnum)
+
+lemma decr_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (decr p)"
+by (induct p, simp_all)
+
+consts
+ isatom :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* test for atomicity *)
+recdef isatom "measure size"
+ "isatom T = True"
+ "isatom F = True"
+ "isatom (Lt a) = True"
+ "isatom (Le a) = True"
+ "isatom (Gt a) = True"
+ "isatom (Ge a) = True"
+ "isatom (Eq a) = True"
+ "isatom (NEq a) = True"
+ "isatom (Dvd i b) = True"
+ "isatom (NDvd i b) = True"
+ "isatom p = False"
+
+lemma numsubst0_numbound0: assumes nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "numbound0 (numsubst0 t a)"
+using nb by (induct a, auto)
+
+lemma subst0_bound0: assumes qf: "qfree p" and nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "bound0 (subst0 t p)"
+using qf numsubst0_numbound0[OF nb] by (induct p, auto)
+
+lemma bound0_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
+by (induct p, simp_all)
+
+
+definition djf:: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "djf f p q = (if q=T then T else if q=F then f p else
+ (let fp = f p in case fp of T \<Rightarrow> T | F \<Rightarrow> q | _ \<Rightarrow> Or fp q))"
+
+definition evaldjf:: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "evaldjf f ps = foldr (djf f) ps F"
+
+lemma djf_Or: "Ifm bs (djf f p q) = Ifm bs (Or (f p) q)"
+by (cases "q=T", simp add: djf_def,cases "q=F",simp add: djf_def)
+(cases "f p", simp_all add: Let_def djf_def)
+
+lemma evaldjf_ex: "Ifm bs (evaldjf f ps) = (\<exists> p \<in> set ps. Ifm bs (f p))"
+ by(induct ps, simp_all add: evaldjf_def djf_Or)
+
+lemma evaldjf_bound0:
+ assumes nb: "\<forall> x\<in> set xs. bound0 (f x)"
+ shows "bound0 (evaldjf f xs)"
+ using nb by (induct xs, auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def) (case_tac "f a", auto)
+
+lemma evaldjf_qf:
+ assumes nb: "\<forall> x\<in> set xs. qfree (f x)"
+ shows "qfree (evaldjf f xs)"
+ using nb by (induct xs, auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def) (case_tac "f a", auto)
+
+consts
+ disjuncts :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm list"
+ conjuncts :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm list"
+recdef disjuncts "measure size"
+ "disjuncts (Or p q) = (disjuncts p) @ (disjuncts q)"
+ "disjuncts F = []"
+ "disjuncts p = [p]"
+
+recdef conjuncts "measure size"
+ "conjuncts (And p q) = (conjuncts p) @ (conjuncts q)"
+ "conjuncts T = []"
+ "conjuncts p = [p]"
+lemma disjuncts: "(\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs q) = Ifm bs p"
+by(induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+lemma conjuncts: "(\<forall> q\<in> set (conjuncts p). Ifm bs q) = Ifm bs p"
+by(induct p rule: conjuncts.induct, auto)
+
+lemma disjuncts_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). bound0 q"
+proof-
+ assume nb: "bound0 p"
+ hence "list_all bound0 (disjuncts p)" by (induct p rule:disjuncts.induct,auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+lemma conjuncts_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (conjuncts p). bound0 q"
+proof-
+ assume nb: "bound0 p"
+ hence "list_all bound0 (conjuncts p)" by (induct p rule:conjuncts.induct,auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+
+lemma disjuncts_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q"
+proof-
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ hence "list_all qfree (disjuncts p)"
+ by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+lemma conjuncts_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> \<forall> q\<in> set (conjuncts p). qfree q"
+proof-
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ hence "list_all qfree (conjuncts p)"
+ by (induct p rule: conjuncts.induct, auto)
+ thus ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
+qed
+
+constdefs DJ :: "(fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "DJ f p \<equiv> evaldjf f (disjuncts p)"
+
+lemma DJ: assumes fdj: "\<forall> p q. f (Or p q) = Or (f p) (f q)"
+ and fF: "f F = F"
+ shows "Ifm bs (DJ f p) = Ifm bs (f p)"
+proof-
+ have "Ifm bs (DJ f p) = (\<exists> q \<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs (f q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bs (f p)" using fdj fF by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma DJ_qf: assumes
+ fqf: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (f p)"
+ shows "\<forall>p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ f p) "
+proof(clarify)
+ fix p assume qf: "qfree p"
+ have th: "DJ f p = evaldjf f (disjuncts p)" by (simp add: DJ_def)
+ from disjuncts_qf[OF qf] have "\<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q" .
+ with fqf have th':"\<forall> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree (f q)" by blast
+
+ from evaldjf_qf[OF th'] th show "qfree (DJ f p)" by simp
+qed
+
+lemma DJ_qe: assumes qe: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs (qe p) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs ((DJ qe p)) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+proof(clarify)
+ fix p::fm and bs
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ from qe have qth: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p)" by blast
+ from DJ_qf[OF qth] qf have qfth:"qfree (DJ qe p)" by auto
+ have "Ifm bs (DJ qe p) = (\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs (qe q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> q \<in> set(disjuncts p). Ifm bs (E q))" using qe disjuncts_qf[OF qf] by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = Ifm bs (E p)" by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show "qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> Ifm bs (DJ qe p) = Ifm bs (E p)" using qfth by blast
+qed
+ (* Simplification *)
+
+ (* Algebraic simplifications for nums *)
+consts bnds:: "num \<Rightarrow> nat list"
+ lex_ns:: "nat list \<times> nat list \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef bnds "measure size"
+ "bnds (Bound n) = [n]"
+ "bnds (CN n c a) = n#(bnds a)"
+ "bnds (Neg a) = bnds a"
+ "bnds (Add a b) = (bnds a)@(bnds b)"
+ "bnds (Sub a b) = (bnds a)@(bnds b)"
+ "bnds (Mul i a) = bnds a"
+ "bnds (Floor a) = bnds a"
+ "bnds (CF c a b) = (bnds a)@(bnds b)"
+ "bnds a = []"
+recdef lex_ns "measure (\<lambda> (xs,ys). length xs + length ys)"
+ "lex_ns ([], ms) = True"
+ "lex_ns (ns, []) = False"
+ "lex_ns (n#ns, m#ms) = (n<m \<or> ((n = m) \<and> lex_ns (ns,ms))) "
+constdefs lex_bnd :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> bool"
+ "lex_bnd t s \<equiv> lex_ns (bnds t, bnds s)"
+
+consts
+ numgcdh:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
+ reducecoeffh:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num"
+ dvdnumcoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
+consts maxcoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> int"
+recdef maxcoeff "measure size"
+ "maxcoeff (C i) = abs i"
+ "maxcoeff (CN n c t) = max (abs c) (maxcoeff t)"
+ "maxcoeff (CF c t s) = max (abs c) (maxcoeff s)"
+ "maxcoeff t = 1"
+
+lemma maxcoeff_pos: "maxcoeff t \<ge> 0"
+ apply (induct t rule: maxcoeff.induct, auto)
+ done
+
+recdef numgcdh "measure size"
+ "numgcdh (C i) = (\<lambda>g. zgcd i g)"
+ "numgcdh (CN n c t) = (\<lambda>g. zgcd c (numgcdh t g))"
+ "numgcdh (CF c s t) = (\<lambda>g. zgcd c (numgcdh t g))"
+ "numgcdh t = (\<lambda>g. 1)"
+
+definition
+ numgcd :: "num \<Rightarrow> int"
+where
+ numgcd_def: "numgcd t = numgcdh t (maxcoeff t)"
+
+recdef reducecoeffh "measure size"
+ "reducecoeffh (C i) = (\<lambda> g. C (i div g))"
+ "reducecoeffh (CN n c t) = (\<lambda> g. CN n (c div g) (reducecoeffh t g))"
+ "reducecoeffh (CF c s t) = (\<lambda> g. CF (c div g) s (reducecoeffh t g))"
+ "reducecoeffh t = (\<lambda>g. t)"
+
+definition
+ reducecoeff :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+where
+ reducecoeff_def: "reducecoeff t =
+ (let g = numgcd t in
+ if g = 0 then C 0 else if g=1 then t else reducecoeffh t g)"
+
+recdef dvdnumcoeff "measure size"
+ "dvdnumcoeff (C i) = (\<lambda> g. g dvd i)"
+ "dvdnumcoeff (CN n c t) = (\<lambda> g. g dvd c \<and> (dvdnumcoeff t g))"
+ "dvdnumcoeff (CF c s t) = (\<lambda> g. g dvd c \<and> (dvdnumcoeff t g))"
+ "dvdnumcoeff t = (\<lambda>g. False)"
+
+lemma dvdnumcoeff_trans:
+ assumes gdg: "g dvd g'" and dgt':"dvdnumcoeff t g'"
+ shows "dvdnumcoeff t g"
+ using dgt' gdg
+ by (induct t rule: dvdnumcoeff.induct, simp_all add: gdg zdvd_trans[OF gdg])
+
+declare zdvd_trans [trans add]
+
+lemma natabs0: "(nat (abs x) = 0) = (x = 0)"
+by arith
+
+lemma numgcd0:
+ assumes g0: "numgcd t = 0"
+ shows "Inum bs t = 0"
+proof-
+ have "\<And>x. numgcdh t x= 0 \<Longrightarrow> Inum bs t = 0"
+ by (induct t rule: numgcdh.induct, auto simp add: zgcd_def gcd_zero natabs0 max_def maxcoeff_pos)
+ thus ?thesis using g0[simplified numgcd_def] by blast
+qed
+
+lemma numgcdh_pos: assumes gp: "g \<ge> 0" shows "numgcdh t g \<ge> 0"
+ using gp
+ by (induct t rule: numgcdh.induct, auto simp add: zgcd_def)
+
+lemma numgcd_pos: "numgcd t \<ge>0"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def numgcdh_pos maxcoeff_pos)
+
+lemma reducecoeffh:
+ assumes gt: "dvdnumcoeff t g" and gp: "g > 0"
+ shows "real g *(Inum bs (reducecoeffh t g)) = Inum bs t"
+ using gt
+proof(induct t rule: reducecoeffh.induct)
+ case (1 i) hence gd: "g dvd i" by simp
+ from gp have gnz: "g \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems show ?case by (simp add: real_of_int_div[OF gnz gd])
+next
+ case (2 n c t) hence gd: "g dvd c" by simp
+ from gp have gnz: "g \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems show ?case by (simp add: real_of_int_div[OF gnz gd] algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (3 c s t) hence gd: "g dvd c" by simp
+ from gp have gnz: "g \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems show ?case by (simp add: real_of_int_div[OF gnz gd] algebra_simps)
+qed (auto simp add: numgcd_def gp)
+consts ismaxcoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef ismaxcoeff "measure size"
+ "ismaxcoeff (C i) = (\<lambda> x. abs i \<le> x)"
+ "ismaxcoeff (CN n c t) = (\<lambda>x. abs c \<le> x \<and> (ismaxcoeff t x))"
+ "ismaxcoeff (CF c s t) = (\<lambda>x. abs c \<le> x \<and> (ismaxcoeff t x))"
+ "ismaxcoeff t = (\<lambda>x. True)"
+
+lemma ismaxcoeff_mono: "ismaxcoeff t c \<Longrightarrow> c \<le> c' \<Longrightarrow> ismaxcoeff t c'"
+by (induct t rule: ismaxcoeff.induct, auto)
+
+lemma maxcoeff_ismaxcoeff: "ismaxcoeff t (maxcoeff t)"
+proof (induct t rule: maxcoeff.induct)
+ case (2 n c t)
+ hence H:"ismaxcoeff t (maxcoeff t)" .
+ have thh: "maxcoeff t \<le> max (abs c) (maxcoeff t)" by (simp add: le_maxI2)
+ from ismaxcoeff_mono[OF H thh] show ?case by (simp add: le_maxI1)
+next
+ case (3 c t s)
+ hence H1:"ismaxcoeff s (maxcoeff s)" by auto
+ have thh1: "maxcoeff s \<le> max \<bar>c\<bar> (maxcoeff s)" by (simp add: max_def)
+ from ismaxcoeff_mono[OF H1 thh1] show ?case by (simp add: le_maxI1)
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma zgcd_gt1: "zgcd i j > 1 \<Longrightarrow> ((abs i > 1 \<and> abs j > 1) \<or> (abs i = 0 \<and> abs j > 1) \<or> (abs i > 1 \<and> abs j = 0))"
+ apply (unfold zgcd_def)
+ apply (cases "i = 0", simp_all)
+ apply (cases "j = 0", simp_all)
+ apply (cases "abs i = 1", simp_all)
+ apply (cases "abs j = 1", simp_all)
+ apply auto
+ done
+lemma numgcdh0:"numgcdh t m = 0 \<Longrightarrow> m =0"
+ by (induct t rule: numgcdh.induct, auto simp add:zgcd0)
+
+lemma dvdnumcoeff_aux:
+ assumes "ismaxcoeff t m" and mp:"m \<ge> 0" and "numgcdh t m > 1"
+ shows "dvdnumcoeff t (numgcdh t m)"
+using prems
+proof(induct t rule: numgcdh.induct)
+ case (2 n c t)
+ let ?g = "numgcdh t m"
+ from prems have th:"zgcd c ?g > 1" by simp
+ from zgcd_gt1[OF th] numgcdh_pos[OF mp, where t="t"]
+ have "(abs c > 1 \<and> ?g > 1) \<or> (abs c = 0 \<and> ?g > 1) \<or> (abs c > 1 \<and> ?g = 0)" by simp
+ moreover {assume "abs c > 1" and gp: "?g > 1" with prems
+ have th: "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" by simp
+ have th': "zgcd c ?g dvd ?g" by (simp add:zgcd_zdvd2)
+ from dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF th' th] have ?case by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)}
+ moreover {assume "abs c = 0 \<and> ?g > 1"
+ with prems have th: "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" by simp
+ have th': "zgcd c ?g dvd ?g" by (simp add:zgcd_zdvd2)
+ from dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF th' th] have ?case by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ moreover {assume "abs c > 1" and g0:"?g = 0"
+ from numgcdh0[OF g0] have "m=0". with prems have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (3 c s t)
+ let ?g = "numgcdh t m"
+ from prems have th:"zgcd c ?g > 1" by simp
+ from zgcd_gt1[OF th] numgcdh_pos[OF mp, where t="t"]
+ have "(abs c > 1 \<and> ?g > 1) \<or> (abs c = 0 \<and> ?g > 1) \<or> (abs c > 1 \<and> ?g = 0)" by simp
+ moreover {assume "abs c > 1" and gp: "?g > 1" with prems
+ have th: "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" by simp
+ have th': "zgcd c ?g dvd ?g" by (simp add:zgcd_zdvd2)
+ from dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF th' th] have ?case by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)}
+ moreover {assume "abs c = 0 \<and> ?g > 1"
+ with prems have th: "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" by simp
+ have th': "zgcd c ?g dvd ?g" by (simp add:zgcd_zdvd2)
+ from dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF th' th] have ?case by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ moreover {assume "abs c > 1" and g0:"?g = 0"
+ from numgcdh0[OF g0] have "m=0". with prems have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed(auto simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+
+lemma dvdnumcoeff_aux2:
+ assumes "numgcd t > 1" shows "dvdnumcoeff t (numgcd t) \<and> numgcd t > 0"
+ using prems
+proof (simp add: numgcd_def)
+ let ?mc = "maxcoeff t"
+ let ?g = "numgcdh t ?mc"
+ have th1: "ismaxcoeff t ?mc" by (rule maxcoeff_ismaxcoeff)
+ have th2: "?mc \<ge> 0" by (rule maxcoeff_pos)
+ assume H: "numgcdh t ?mc > 1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux[OF th1 th2 H] show "dvdnumcoeff t ?g" .
+qed
+
+lemma reducecoeff: "real (numgcd t) * (Inum bs (reducecoeff t)) = Inum bs t"
+proof-
+ let ?g = "numgcd t"
+ have "?g \<ge> 0" by (simp add: numgcd_pos)
+ hence "?g = 0 \<or> ?g = 1 \<or> ?g > 1" by auto
+ moreover {assume "?g = 0" hence ?thesis by (simp add: numgcd0)}
+ moreover {assume "?g = 1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: reducecoeff_def)}
+ moreover { assume g1:"?g > 1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux2[OF g1] have th1:"dvdnumcoeff t ?g" and g0: "?g > 0" by blast+
+ from reducecoeffh[OF th1 g0, where bs="bs"] g1 have ?thesis
+ by (simp add: reducecoeff_def Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma reducecoeffh_numbound0: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (reducecoeffh t g)"
+by (induct t rule: reducecoeffh.induct, auto)
+
+lemma reducecoeff_numbound0: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (reducecoeff t)"
+using reducecoeffh_numbound0 by (simp add: reducecoeff_def Let_def)
+
+consts
+ simpnum:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ numadd:: "num \<times> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ nummul:: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num"
+
+recdef numadd "measure (\<lambda> (t,s). size t + size s)"
+ "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1,CN n2 c2 r2) =
+ (if n1=n2 then
+ (let c = c1 + c2
+ in (if c=0 then numadd(r1,r2) else CN n1 c (numadd (r1,r2))))
+ else if n1 \<le> n2 then CN n1 c1 (numadd (r1,CN n2 c2 r2))
+ else (CN n2 c2 (numadd (CN n1 c1 r1,r2))))"
+ "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1,t) = CN n1 c1 (numadd (r1, t))"
+ "numadd (t,CN n2 c2 r2) = CN n2 c2 (numadd (t,r2))"
+ "numadd (CF c1 t1 r1,CF c2 t2 r2) =
+ (if t1 = t2 then
+ (let c=c1+c2; s= numadd(r1,r2) in (if c=0 then s else CF c t1 s))
+ else if lex_bnd t1 t2 then CF c1 t1 (numadd(r1,CF c2 t2 r2))
+ else CF c2 t2 (numadd(CF c1 t1 r1,r2)))"
+ "numadd (CF c1 t1 r1,C c) = CF c1 t1 (numadd (r1, C c))"
+ "numadd (C c,CF c1 t1 r1) = CF c1 t1 (numadd (r1, C c))"
+ "numadd (C b1, C b2) = C (b1+b2)"
+ "numadd (a,b) = Add a b"
+
+lemma numadd[simp]: "Inum bs (numadd (t,s)) = Inum bs (Add t s)"
+apply (induct t s rule: numadd.induct, simp_all add: Let_def)
+ apply (case_tac "c1+c2 = 0",case_tac "n1 \<le> n2", simp_all)
+ apply (case_tac "n1 = n2", simp_all add: algebra_simps)
+ apply (simp only: left_distrib[symmetric])
+ apply simp
+apply (case_tac "lex_bnd t1 t2", simp_all)
+ apply (case_tac "c1+c2 = 0")
+ by (case_tac "t1 = t2", simp_all add: algebra_simps left_distrib[symmetric] real_of_int_mult[symmetric] real_of_int_add[symmetric]del: real_of_int_mult real_of_int_add left_distrib)
+
+lemma numadd_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk> numbound0 t ; numbound0 s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numadd (t,s))"
+by (induct t s rule: numadd.induct, auto simp add: Let_def)
+
+recdef nummul "measure size"
+ "nummul (C j) = (\<lambda> i. C (i*j))"
+ "nummul (CN n c t) = (\<lambda> i. CN n (c*i) (nummul t i))"
+ "nummul (CF c t s) = (\<lambda> i. CF (c*i) t (nummul s i))"
+ "nummul (Mul c t) = (\<lambda> i. nummul t (i*c))"
+ "nummul t = (\<lambda> i. Mul i t)"
+
+lemma nummul[simp]: "\<And> i. Inum bs (nummul t i) = Inum bs (Mul i t)"
+by (induct t rule: nummul.induct, auto simp add: algebra_simps)
+
+lemma nummul_nb[simp]: "\<And> i. numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (nummul t i)"
+by (induct t rule: nummul.induct, auto)
+
+constdefs numneg :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ "numneg t \<equiv> nummul t (- 1)"
+
+constdefs numsub :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ "numsub s t \<equiv> (if s = t then C 0 else numadd (s,numneg t))"
+
+lemma numneg[simp]: "Inum bs (numneg t) = Inum bs (Neg t)"
+using numneg_def nummul by simp
+
+lemma numneg_nb[simp]: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numneg t)"
+using numneg_def by simp
+
+lemma numsub[simp]: "Inum bs (numsub a b) = Inum bs (Sub a b)"
+using numsub_def by simp
+
+lemma numsub_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk> numbound0 t ; numbound0 s\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numsub t s)"
+using numsub_def by simp
+
+lemma isint_CF: assumes si: "isint s bs" shows "isint (CF c t s) bs"
+proof-
+ have cti: "isint (Mul c (Floor t)) bs" by (simp add: isint_Mul isint_Floor)
+
+ have "?thesis = isint (Add (Mul c (Floor t)) s) bs" by (simp add: isint_def)
+ also have "\<dots>" by (simp add: isint_add cti si)
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+consts split_int:: "num \<Rightarrow> num\<times>num"
+recdef split_int "measure num_size"
+ "split_int (C c) = (C 0, C c)"
+ "split_int (CN n c b) =
+ (let (bv,bi) = split_int b
+ in (CN n c bv, bi))"
+ "split_int (CF c a b) =
+ (let (bv,bi) = split_int b
+ in (bv, CF c a bi))"
+ "split_int a = (a,C 0)"
+
+lemma split_int:"\<And> tv ti. split_int t = (tv,ti) \<Longrightarrow> (Inum bs (Add tv ti) = Inum bs t) \<and> isint ti bs"
+proof (induct t rule: split_int.induct)
+ case (2 c n b tv ti)
+ let ?bv = "fst (split_int b)"
+ let ?bi = "snd (split_int b)"
+ have "split_int b = (?bv,?bi)" by simp
+ with prems(1) have b:"Inum bs (Add ?bv ?bi) = Inum bs b" and bii: "isint ?bi bs" by blast+
+ from prems(2) have tibi: "ti = ?bi" by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from prems(2) b[symmetric] bii show ?case by (auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+next
+ case (3 c a b tv ti)
+ let ?bv = "fst (split_int b)"
+ let ?bi = "snd (split_int b)"
+ have "split_int b = (?bv,?bi)" by simp
+ with prems(1) have b:"Inum bs (Add ?bv ?bi) = Inum bs b" and bii: "isint ?bi bs" by blast+
+ from prems(2) have tibi: "ti = CF c a ?bi" by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from prems(2) b[symmetric] bii show ?case by (auto simp add: Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_add isint_Mul isint_CF)
+qed (auto simp add: Let_def isint_iff isint_Floor isint_add isint_Mul split_def algebra_simps)
+
+lemma split_int_nb: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (fst (split_int t)) \<and> numbound0 (snd (split_int t)) "
+by (induct t rule: split_int.induct, auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+
+definition
+ numfloor:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+where
+ numfloor_def: "numfloor t = (let (tv,ti) = split_int t in
+ (case tv of C i \<Rightarrow> numadd (tv,ti)
+ | _ \<Rightarrow> numadd(CF 1 tv (C 0),ti)))"
+
+lemma numfloor[simp]: "Inum bs (numfloor t) = Inum bs (Floor t)" (is "?n t = ?N (Floor t)")
+proof-
+ let ?tv = "fst (split_int t)"
+ let ?ti = "snd (split_int t)"
+ have tvti:"split_int t = (?tv,?ti)" by simp
+ {assume H: "\<forall> v. ?tv \<noteq> C v"
+ hence th1: "?n t = ?N (Add (Floor ?tv) ?ti)"
+ by (cases ?tv, auto simp add: numfloor_def Let_def split_def numadd)
+ from split_int[OF tvti] have "?N (Floor t) = ?N (Floor(Add ?tv ?ti))" and tii:"isint ?ti bs" by simp+
+ hence "?N (Floor t) = real (floor (?N (Add ?tv ?ti)))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (floor (?N ?tv) + (floor (?N ?ti)))"
+ by (simp,subst tii[simplified isint_iff, symmetric]) simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N (Add (Floor ?tv) ?ti)" by (simp add: tii[simplified isint_iff])
+ finally have ?thesis using th1 by simp}
+ moreover {fix v assume H:"?tv = C v"
+ from split_int[OF tvti] have "?N (Floor t) = ?N (Floor(Add ?tv ?ti))" and tii:"isint ?ti bs" by simp+
+ hence "?N (Floor t) = real (floor (?N (Add ?tv ?ti)))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (floor (?N ?tv) + (floor (?N ?ti)))"
+ by (simp,subst tii[simplified isint_iff, symmetric]) simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N (Add (Floor ?tv) ?ti)" by (simp add: tii[simplified isint_iff])
+ finally have ?thesis by (simp add: H numfloor_def Let_def split_def numadd) }
+ ultimately show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+lemma numfloor_nb[simp]: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numfloor t)"
+ using split_int_nb[where t="t"]
+ by (cases "fst(split_int t)" , auto simp add: numfloor_def Let_def split_def numadd_nb)
+
+recdef simpnum "measure num_size"
+ "simpnum (C j) = C j"
+ "simpnum (Bound n) = CN n 1 (C 0)"
+ "simpnum (Neg t) = numneg (simpnum t)"
+ "simpnum (Add t s) = numadd (simpnum t,simpnum s)"
+ "simpnum (Sub t s) = numsub (simpnum t) (simpnum s)"
+ "simpnum (Mul i t) = (if i = 0 then (C 0) else nummul (simpnum t) i)"
+ "simpnum (Floor t) = numfloor (simpnum t)"
+ "simpnum (CN n c t) = (if c=0 then simpnum t else CN n c (simpnum t))"
+ "simpnum (CF c t s) = simpnum(Add (Mul c (Floor t)) s)"
+
+lemma simpnum_ci[simp]: "Inum bs (simpnum t) = Inum bs t"
+by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto)
+
+lemma simpnum_numbound0[simp]:
+ "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (simpnum t)"
+by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto)
+
+consts nozerocoeff:: "num \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef nozerocoeff "measure size"
+ "nozerocoeff (C c) = True"
+ "nozerocoeff (CN n c t) = (c\<noteq>0 \<and> nozerocoeff t)"
+ "nozerocoeff (CF c s t) = (c \<noteq> 0 \<and> nozerocoeff t)"
+ "nozerocoeff (Mul c t) = (c\<noteq>0 \<and> nozerocoeff t)"
+ "nozerocoeff t = True"
+
+lemma numadd_nz : "nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff b \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numadd (a,b))"
+by (induct a b rule: numadd.induct,auto simp add: Let_def)
+
+lemma nummul_nz : "\<And> i. i\<noteq>0 \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (nummul a i)"
+ by (induct a rule: nummul.induct,auto simp add: Let_def numadd_nz)
+
+lemma numneg_nz : "nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numneg a)"
+by (simp add: numneg_def nummul_nz)
+
+lemma numsub_nz: "nozerocoeff a \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff b \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numsub a b)"
+by (simp add: numsub_def numneg_nz numadd_nz)
+
+lemma split_int_nz: "nozerocoeff t \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (fst (split_int t)) \<and> nozerocoeff (snd (split_int t))"
+by (induct t rule: split_int.induct,auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+
+lemma numfloor_nz: "nozerocoeff t \<Longrightarrow> nozerocoeff (numfloor t)"
+by (simp add: numfloor_def Let_def split_def)
+(cases "fst (split_int t)", simp_all add: split_int_nz numadd_nz)
+
+lemma simpnum_nz: "nozerocoeff (simpnum t)"
+by(induct t rule: simpnum.induct, auto simp add: numadd_nz numneg_nz numsub_nz nummul_nz numfloor_nz)
+
+lemma maxcoeff_nz: "nozerocoeff t \<Longrightarrow> maxcoeff t = 0 \<Longrightarrow> t = C 0"
+proof (induct t rule: maxcoeff.induct)
+ case (2 n c t)
+ hence cnz: "c \<noteq>0" and mx: "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) = 0" by simp+
+ have "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) \<ge> abs c" by (simp add: le_maxI1)
+ with cnz have "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) > 0" by arith
+ with prems show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (3 c s t)
+ hence cnz: "c \<noteq>0" and mx: "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) = 0" by simp+
+ have "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) \<ge> abs c" by (simp add: le_maxI1)
+ with cnz have "max (abs c) (maxcoeff t) > 0" by arith
+ with prems show ?case by simp
+qed auto
+
+lemma numgcd_nz: assumes nz: "nozerocoeff t" and g0: "numgcd t = 0" shows "t = C 0"
+proof-
+ from g0 have th:"numgcdh t (maxcoeff t) = 0" by (simp add: numgcd_def)
+ from numgcdh0[OF th] have th:"maxcoeff t = 0" .
+ from maxcoeff_nz[OF nz th] show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+constdefs simp_num_pair:: "(num \<times> int) \<Rightarrow> num \<times> int"
+ "simp_num_pair \<equiv> (\<lambda> (t,n). (if n = 0 then (C 0, 0) else
+ (let t' = simpnum t ; g = numgcd t' in
+ if g > 1 then (let g' = zgcd n g in
+ if g' = 1 then (t',n)
+ else (reducecoeffh t' g', n div g'))
+ else (t',n))))"
+
+lemma simp_num_pair_ci:
+ shows "((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum bs t / real n) (simp_num_pair (t,n))) = ((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum bs t / real n) (t,n))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof-
+ let ?t' = "simpnum t"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?t'"
+ let ?g' = "zgcd n ?g"
+ {assume nz: "n = 0" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover
+ { assume nnz: "n \<noteq> 0"
+ {assume "\<not> ?g > 1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume g1:"?g>1" hence g0: "?g > 0" by simp
+ from zgcd0 g1 nnz have gp0: "?g' \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ hence g'p: "?g' > 0" using zgcd_pos[where i="n" and j="numgcd ?t'"] by arith
+ hence "?g'= 1 \<or> ?g' > 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume "?g'=1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover {assume g'1:"?g'>1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux2[OF g1] have th1:"dvdnumcoeff ?t' ?g" ..
+ let ?tt = "reducecoeffh ?t' ?g'"
+ let ?t = "Inum bs ?tt"
+ have gpdg: "?g' dvd ?g" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd2)
+ have gpdd: "?g' dvd n" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ have gpdgp: "?g' dvd ?g'" by simp
+ from reducecoeffh[OF dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF gpdg th1] g'p]
+ have th2:"real ?g' * ?t = Inum bs ?t'" by simp
+ from prems have "?lhs = ?t / real (n div ?g')" by (simp add: simp_num_pair_def Let_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real ?g' * ?t) / (real ?g' * (real (n div ?g')))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (Inum bs ?t' / real n)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF gp0 gpdd] th2 gp0 by simp
+ finally have "?lhs = Inum bs t / real n" by simp
+ then have ?thesis using prems by (simp add: simp_num_pair_def)}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma simp_num_pair_l: assumes tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "n >0" and tn: "simp_num_pair (t,n) = (t',n')"
+ shows "numbound0 t' \<and> n' >0"
+proof-
+ let ?t' = "simpnum t"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?t'"
+ let ?g' = "zgcd n ?g"
+ {assume nz: "n = 0" hence ?thesis using prems by (simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover
+ { assume nnz: "n \<noteq> 0"
+ {assume "\<not> ?g > 1" hence ?thesis using prems by (auto simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume g1:"?g>1" hence g0: "?g > 0" by simp
+ from zgcd0 g1 nnz have gp0: "?g' \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ hence g'p: "?g' > 0" using zgcd_pos[where i="n" and j="numgcd ?t'"] by arith
+ hence "?g'= 1 \<or> ?g' > 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume "?g'=1" hence ?thesis using prems
+ by (auto simp add: Let_def simp_num_pair_def)}
+ moreover {assume g'1:"?g'>1"
+ have gpdg: "?g' dvd ?g" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd2)
+ have gpdd: "?g' dvd n" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ have gpdgp: "?g' dvd ?g'" by simp
+ from zdvd_imp_le[OF gpdd np] have g'n: "?g' \<le> n" .
+ from zdiv_mono1[OF g'n g'p, simplified zdiv_self[OF gp0]]
+ have "n div ?g' >0" by simp
+ hence ?thesis using prems
+ by(auto simp add: simp_num_pair_def Let_def reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+consts not:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef not "measure size"
+ "not (NOT p) = p"
+ "not T = F"
+ "not F = T"
+ "not (Lt t) = Ge t"
+ "not (Le t) = Gt t"
+ "not (Gt t) = Le t"
+ "not (Ge t) = Lt t"
+ "not (Eq t) = NEq t"
+ "not (NEq t) = Eq t"
+ "not (Dvd i t) = NDvd i t"
+ "not (NDvd i t) = Dvd i t"
+ "not (And p q) = Or (not p) (not q)"
+ "not (Or p q) = And (not p) (not q)"
+ "not p = NOT p"
+lemma not[simp]: "Ifm bs (not p) = Ifm bs (NOT p)"
+by (induct p) auto
+lemma not_qf[simp]: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (not p)"
+by (induct p, auto)
+lemma not_nb[simp]: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (not p)"
+by (induct p, auto)
+
+constdefs conj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "conj p q \<equiv> (if (p = F \<or> q=F) then F else if p=T then q else if q=T then p else
+ if p = q then p else And p q)"
+lemma conj[simp]: "Ifm bs (conj p q) = Ifm bs (And p q)"
+by (cases "p=F \<or> q=F",simp_all add: conj_def) (cases p,simp_all)
+
+lemma conj_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (conj p q)"
+using conj_def by auto
+lemma conj_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (conj p q)"
+using conj_def by auto
+
+constdefs disj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "disj p q \<equiv> (if (p = T \<or> q=T) then T else if p=F then q else if q=F then p
+ else if p=q then p else Or p q)"
+
+lemma disj[simp]: "Ifm bs (disj p q) = Ifm bs (Or p q)"
+by (cases "p=T \<or> q=T",simp_all add: disj_def) (cases p,simp_all)
+lemma disj_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (disj p q)"
+using disj_def by auto
+lemma disj_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (disj p q)"
+using disj_def by auto
+
+constdefs imp :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "imp p q \<equiv> (if (p = F \<or> q=T \<or> p=q) then T else if p=T then q else if q=F then not p
+ else Imp p q)"
+lemma imp[simp]: "Ifm bs (imp p q) = Ifm bs (Imp p q)"
+by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def)
+lemma imp_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (imp p q)"
+using imp_def by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T",simp_all add: imp_def)
+lemma imp_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (imp p q)"
+using imp_def by (cases "p=F \<or> q=T \<or> p=q",simp_all add: imp_def)
+
+constdefs iff :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "iff p q \<equiv> (if (p = q) then T else if (p = not q \<or> not p = q) then F else
+ if p=F then not q else if q=F then not p else if p=T then q else if q=T then p else
+ Iff p q)"
+lemma iff[simp]: "Ifm bs (iff p q) = Ifm bs (Iff p q)"
+ by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", simp,cases "p=not q", simp add:not)
+(cases "not p= q", auto simp add:not)
+lemma iff_qf[simp]: "\<lbrakk>qfree p ; qfree q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> qfree (iff p q)"
+ by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", auto)
+lemma iff_nb[simp]: "\<lbrakk>bound0 p ; bound0 q\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (iff p q)"
+using iff_def by (unfold iff_def,cases "p=q", auto)
+
+consts check_int:: "num \<Rightarrow> bool"
+recdef check_int "measure size"
+ "check_int (C i) = True"
+ "check_int (Floor t) = True"
+ "check_int (Mul i t) = check_int t"
+ "check_int (Add t s) = (check_int t \<and> check_int s)"
+ "check_int (Neg t) = check_int t"
+ "check_int (CF c t s) = check_int s"
+ "check_int t = False"
+lemma check_int: "check_int t \<Longrightarrow> isint t bs"
+by (induct t, auto simp add: isint_add isint_Floor isint_Mul isint_neg isint_c isint_CF)
+
+lemma rdvd_left1_int: "real \<lfloor>t\<rfloor> = t \<Longrightarrow> 1 rdvd t"
+ by (simp add: rdvd_def,rule_tac x="\<lfloor>t\<rfloor>" in exI) simp
+
+lemma rdvd_reduce:
+ assumes gd:"g dvd d" and gc:"g dvd c" and gp: "g > 0"
+ shows "real (d::int) rdvd real (c::int)*t = (real (d div g) rdvd real (c div g)*t)"
+proof
+ assume d: "real d rdvd real c * t"
+ from d rdvd_def obtain k where k_def: "real c * t = real d* real (k::int)" by auto
+ from gd dvd_def obtain kd where kd_def: "d = g * kd" by auto
+ from gc dvd_def obtain kc where kc_def: "c = g * kc" by auto
+ from k_def kd_def kc_def have "real g * real kc * t = real g * real kd * real k" by simp
+ hence "real kc * t = real kd * real k" using gp by simp
+ hence th:"real kd rdvd real kc * t" using rdvd_def by blast
+ from kd_def gp have th':"kd = d div g" by simp
+ from kc_def gp have "kc = c div g" by simp
+ with th th' show "real (d div g) rdvd real (c div g) * t" by simp
+next
+ assume d: "real (d div g) rdvd real (c div g) * t"
+ from gp have gnz: "g \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ thus "real d rdvd real c * t" using d rdvd_mult[OF gnz, where n="d div g" and x="real (c div g) * t"] real_of_int_div[OF gnz gd] real_of_int_div[OF gnz gc] by simp
+qed
+
+constdefs simpdvd:: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> (int \<times> num)"
+ "simpdvd d t \<equiv>
+ (let g = numgcd t in
+ if g > 1 then (let g' = zgcd d g in
+ if g' = 1 then (d, t)
+ else (d div g',reducecoeffh t g'))
+ else (d, t))"
+lemma simpdvd:
+ assumes tnz: "nozerocoeff t" and dnz: "d \<noteq> 0"
+ shows "Ifm bs (Dvd (fst (simpdvd d t)) (snd (simpdvd d t))) = Ifm bs (Dvd d t)"
+proof-
+ let ?g = "numgcd t"
+ let ?g' = "zgcd d ?g"
+ {assume "\<not> ?g > 1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simpdvd_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume g1:"?g>1" hence g0: "?g > 0" by simp
+ from zgcd0 g1 dnz have gp0: "?g' \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ hence g'p: "?g' > 0" using zgcd_pos[where i="d" and j="numgcd t"] by arith
+ hence "?g'= 1 \<or> ?g' > 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume "?g'=1" hence ?thesis by (simp add: Let_def simpdvd_def)}
+ moreover {assume g'1:"?g'>1"
+ from dvdnumcoeff_aux2[OF g1] have th1:"dvdnumcoeff t ?g" ..
+ let ?tt = "reducecoeffh t ?g'"
+ let ?t = "Inum bs ?tt"
+ have gpdg: "?g' dvd ?g" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd2)
+ have gpdd: "?g' dvd d" by (simp add: zgcd_zdvd1)
+ have gpdgp: "?g' dvd ?g'" by simp
+ from reducecoeffh[OF dvdnumcoeff_trans[OF gpdg th1] g'p]
+ have th2:"real ?g' * ?t = Inum bs t" by simp
+ from prems have "Ifm bs (Dvd (fst (simpdvd d t)) (snd(simpdvd d t))) = Ifm bs (Dvd (d div ?g') ?tt)"
+ by (simp add: simpdvd_def Let_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real d rdvd (Inum bs t))"
+ using rdvd_reduce[OF gpdd gpdgp g'p, where t="?t", simplified zdiv_self[OF gp0]]
+ th2[symmetric] by simp
+ finally have ?thesis by simp }
+ ultimately have ?thesis by blast
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+consts simpfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef simpfm "measure fmsize"
+ "simpfm (And p q) = conj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (Or p q) = disj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (Imp p q) = imp (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (Iff p q) = iff (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
+ "simpfm (NOT p) = not (simpfm p)"
+ "simpfm (Lt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v < 0) then T else F
+ | _ \<Rightarrow> Lt (reducecoeff a'))"
+ "simpfm (Le a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<le> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Le (reducecoeff a'))"
+ "simpfm (Gt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v > 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Gt (reducecoeff a'))"
+ "simpfm (Ge a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<ge> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Ge (reducecoeff a'))"
+ "simpfm (Eq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v = 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Eq (reducecoeff a'))"
+ "simpfm (NEq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (v \<noteq> 0) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> NEq (reducecoeff a'))"
+ "simpfm (Dvd i a) = (if i=0 then simpfm (Eq a)
+ else if (abs i = 1) \<and> check_int a then T
+ else let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (i dvd v) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> (let (d,t) = simpdvd i a' in Dvd d t))"
+ "simpfm (NDvd i a) = (if i=0 then simpfm (NEq a)
+ else if (abs i = 1) \<and> check_int a then F
+ else let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if (\<not>(i dvd v)) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> (let (d,t) = simpdvd i a' in NDvd d t))"
+ "simpfm p = p"
+
+lemma simpfm[simp]: "Ifm bs (simpfm p) = Ifm bs p"
+proof(induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
+ case (6 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?sa"
+ let ?rsa = "reducecoeff ?sa"
+ let ?r = "Inum bs ?rsa"
+ have sa_nz: "nozerocoeff ?sa" by (rule simpnum_nz)
+ {assume gz: "?g=0" from numgcd_nz[OF sa_nz gz] H have "False" by auto}
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="?sa"] have "?g > 0" by (cases "?g=0", auto)
+ hence gp: "real ?g > 0" by simp
+ have "Inum bs ?sa = real ?g* ?r" by (simp add: reducecoeff)
+ with sa have "Inum bs a < 0 = (real ?g * ?r < real ?g * 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?r < 0)" using gp
+ by (simp only: mult_less_cancel_left) simp
+ finally have ?case using H by (cases "?sa" , simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?sa"
+ let ?rsa = "reducecoeff ?sa"
+ let ?r = "Inum bs ?rsa"
+ have sa_nz: "nozerocoeff ?sa" by (rule simpnum_nz)
+ {assume gz: "?g=0" from numgcd_nz[OF sa_nz gz] H have "False" by auto}
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="?sa"] have "?g > 0" by (cases "?g=0", auto)
+ hence gp: "real ?g > 0" by simp
+ have "Inum bs ?sa = real ?g* ?r" by (simp add: reducecoeff)
+ with sa have "Inum bs a \<le> 0 = (real ?g * ?r \<le> real ?g * 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?r \<le> 0)" using gp
+ by (simp only: mult_le_cancel_left) simp
+ finally have ?case using H by (cases "?sa" , simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?sa"
+ let ?rsa = "reducecoeff ?sa"
+ let ?r = "Inum bs ?rsa"
+ have sa_nz: "nozerocoeff ?sa" by (rule simpnum_nz)
+ {assume gz: "?g=0" from numgcd_nz[OF sa_nz gz] H have "False" by auto}
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="?sa"] have "?g > 0" by (cases "?g=0", auto)
+ hence gp: "real ?g > 0" by simp
+ have "Inum bs ?sa = real ?g* ?r" by (simp add: reducecoeff)
+ with sa have "Inum bs a > 0 = (real ?g * ?r > real ?g * 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?r > 0)" using gp
+ by (simp only: mult_less_cancel_left) simp
+ finally have ?case using H by (cases "?sa" , simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?sa"
+ let ?rsa = "reducecoeff ?sa"
+ let ?r = "Inum bs ?rsa"
+ have sa_nz: "nozerocoeff ?sa" by (rule simpnum_nz)
+ {assume gz: "?g=0" from numgcd_nz[OF sa_nz gz] H have "False" by auto}
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="?sa"] have "?g > 0" by (cases "?g=0", auto)
+ hence gp: "real ?g > 0" by simp
+ have "Inum bs ?sa = real ?g* ?r" by (simp add: reducecoeff)
+ with sa have "Inum bs a \<ge> 0 = (real ?g * ?r \<ge> real ?g * 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?r \<ge> 0)" using gp
+ by (simp only: mult_le_cancel_left) simp
+ finally have ?case using H by (cases "?sa" , simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (10 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?sa"
+ let ?rsa = "reducecoeff ?sa"
+ let ?r = "Inum bs ?rsa"
+ have sa_nz: "nozerocoeff ?sa" by (rule simpnum_nz)
+ {assume gz: "?g=0" from numgcd_nz[OF sa_nz gz] H have "False" by auto}
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="?sa"] have "?g > 0" by (cases "?g=0", auto)
+ hence gp: "real ?g > 0" by simp
+ have "Inum bs ?sa = real ?g* ?r" by (simp add: reducecoeff)
+ with sa have "Inum bs a = 0 = (real ?g * ?r = 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?r = 0)" using gp
+ by (simp add: mult_eq_0_iff)
+ finally have ?case using H by (cases "?sa" , simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (11 a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa by simp }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ let ?g = "numgcd ?sa"
+ let ?rsa = "reducecoeff ?sa"
+ let ?r = "Inum bs ?rsa"
+ have sa_nz: "nozerocoeff ?sa" by (rule simpnum_nz)
+ {assume gz: "?g=0" from numgcd_nz[OF sa_nz gz] H have "False" by auto}
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="?sa"] have "?g > 0" by (cases "?g=0", auto)
+ hence gp: "real ?g > 0" by simp
+ have "Inum bs ?sa = real ?g* ?r" by (simp add: reducecoeff)
+ with sa have "Inum bs a \<noteq> 0 = (real ?g * ?r \<noteq> 0)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?r \<noteq> 0)" using gp
+ by (simp add: mult_eq_0_iff)
+ finally have ?case using H by (cases "?sa" , simp_all add: Let_def)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (12 i a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ have "i=0 \<or> (abs i = 1 \<and> check_int a) \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> ((abs i \<noteq> 1) \<or> (\<not> check_int a)))" by auto
+ {assume "i=0" hence ?case using "12.hyps" by (simp add: rdvd_left_0_eq Let_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume ai1: "abs i = 1" and ai: "check_int a"
+ hence "i=1 \<or> i= - 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume i1: "i = 1"
+ from rdvd_left1_int[OF check_int[OF ai, simplified isint_iff]]
+ have ?case using i1 ai by simp }
+ moreover {assume i1: "i = - 1"
+ from rdvd_left1_int[OF check_int[OF ai, simplified isint_iff]]
+ rdvd_abs1[where d="- 1" and t="Inum bs a"]
+ have ?case using i1 ai by simp }
+ ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and cond: "(abs i \<noteq> 1) \<or> (\<not> check_int a)"
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa[symmetric] inz cond
+ by (cases "abs i = 1", auto simp add: int_rdvd_iff) }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ hence th: "simpfm (Dvd i a) = Dvd (fst (simpdvd i ?sa)) (snd (simpdvd i ?sa))" using inz cond by (cases ?sa, auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from simpnum_nz have nz:"nozerocoeff ?sa" by simp
+ from simpdvd [OF nz inz] th have ?case using sa by simp}
+ ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (13 i a) let ?sa = "simpnum a" have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a" by simp
+ have "i=0 \<or> (abs i = 1 \<and> check_int a) \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> ((abs i \<noteq> 1) \<or> (\<not> check_int a)))" by auto
+ {assume "i=0" hence ?case using "13.hyps" by (simp add: rdvd_left_0_eq Let_def)}
+ moreover
+ {assume ai1: "abs i = 1" and ai: "check_int a"
+ hence "i=1 \<or> i= - 1" by arith
+ moreover {assume i1: "i = 1"
+ from rdvd_left1_int[OF check_int[OF ai, simplified isint_iff]]
+ have ?case using i1 ai by simp }
+ moreover {assume i1: "i = - 1"
+ from rdvd_left1_int[OF check_int[OF ai, simplified isint_iff]]
+ rdvd_abs1[where d="- 1" and t="Inum bs a"]
+ have ?case using i1 ai by simp }
+ ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and cond: "(abs i \<noteq> 1) \<or> (\<not> check_int a)"
+ {fix v assume "?sa = C v" hence ?case using sa[symmetric] inz cond
+ by (cases "abs i = 1", auto simp add: int_rdvd_iff) }
+ moreover {assume H:"\<not> (\<exists> v. ?sa = C v)"
+ hence th: "simpfm (NDvd i a) = NDvd (fst (simpdvd i ?sa)) (snd (simpdvd i ?sa))" using inz cond
+ by (cases ?sa, auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from simpnum_nz have nz:"nozerocoeff ?sa" by simp
+ from simpdvd [OF nz inz] th have ?case using sa by simp}
+ ultimately have ?case by blast}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed (induct p rule: simpfm.induct, simp_all)
+
+lemma simpdvd_numbound0: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (snd (simpdvd d t))"
+ by (simp add: simpdvd_def Let_def split_def reducecoeffh_numbound0)
+
+lemma simpfm_bound0[simp]: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (simpfm p)"
+proof(induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
+ case (6 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0)
+next
+ case (7 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0)
+next
+ case (8 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0)
+next
+ case (9 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0)
+next
+ case (10 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0)
+next
+ case (11 a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0)
+next
+ case (12 i a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0 simpdvd_numbound0 split_def)
+next
+ case (13 i a) hence nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
+ hence "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
+ thus ?case by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_numbound0 simpdvd_numbound0 split_def)
+qed(auto simp add: disj_def imp_def iff_def conj_def)
+
+lemma simpfm_qf[simp]: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (simpfm p)"
+by (induct p rule: simpfm.induct, auto simp add: Let_def)
+(case_tac "simpnum a",auto simp add: split_def Let_def)+
+
+
+ (* Generic quantifier elimination *)
+
+constdefs list_conj :: "fm list \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "list_conj ps \<equiv> foldr conj ps T"
+lemma list_conj: "Ifm bs (list_conj ps) = (\<forall>p\<in> set ps. Ifm bs p)"
+ by (induct ps, auto simp add: list_conj_def)
+lemma list_conj_qf: " \<forall>p\<in> set ps. qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (list_conj ps)"
+ by (induct ps, auto simp add: list_conj_def)
+lemma list_conj_nb: " \<forall>p\<in> set ps. bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (list_conj ps)"
+ by (induct ps, auto simp add: list_conj_def)
+constdefs CJNB:: "(fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "CJNB f p \<equiv> (let cjs = conjuncts p ; (yes,no) = List.partition bound0 cjs
+ in conj (decr (list_conj yes)) (f (list_conj no)))"
+
+lemma CJNB_qe:
+ assumes qe: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs (qe p) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (CJNB qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs ((CJNB qe p)) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+proof(clarify)
+ fix bs p
+ assume qfp: "qfree p"
+ let ?cjs = "conjuncts p"
+ let ?yes = "fst (List.partition bound0 ?cjs)"
+ let ?no = "snd (List.partition bound0 ?cjs)"
+ let ?cno = "list_conj ?no"
+ let ?cyes = "list_conj ?yes"
+ have part: "List.partition bound0 ?cjs = (?yes,?no)" by simp
+ from partition_P[OF part] have "\<forall> q\<in> set ?yes. bound0 q" by blast
+ hence yes_nb: "bound0 ?cyes" by (simp add: list_conj_nb)
+ hence yes_qf: "qfree (decr ?cyes )" by (simp add: decr_qf)
+ from conjuncts_qf[OF qfp] partition_set[OF part]
+ have " \<forall>q\<in> set ?no. qfree q" by auto
+ hence no_qf: "qfree ?cno"by (simp add: list_conj_qf)
+ with qe have cno_qf:"qfree (qe ?cno )"
+ and noE: "Ifm bs (qe ?cno) = Ifm bs (E ?cno)" by blast+
+ from cno_qf yes_qf have qf: "qfree (CJNB qe p)"
+ by (simp add: CJNB_def Let_def conj_qf split_def)
+ {fix bs
+ from conjuncts have "Ifm bs p = (\<forall>q\<in> set ?cjs. Ifm bs q)" by blast
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<forall>q\<in> set ?yes. Ifm bs q) \<and> (\<forall>q\<in> set ?no. Ifm bs q))"
+ using partition_set[OF part] by auto
+ finally have "Ifm bs p = ((Ifm bs ?cyes) \<and> (Ifm bs ?cno))" using list_conj by simp}
+ hence "Ifm bs (E p) = (\<exists>x. (Ifm (x#bs) ?cyes) \<and> (Ifm (x#bs) ?cno))" by simp
+ also fix y have "\<dots> = (\<exists>x. (Ifm (y#bs) ?cyes) \<and> (Ifm (x#bs) ?cno))"
+ using bound0_I[OF yes_nb, where bs="bs" and b'="y"] by blast
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm bs (decr ?cyes) \<and> Ifm bs (E ?cno))"
+ by (auto simp add: decr[OF yes_nb])
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm bs (conj (decr ?cyes) (qe ?cno)))"
+ using qe[rule_format, OF no_qf] by auto
+ finally have "Ifm bs (E p) = Ifm bs (CJNB qe p)"
+ by (simp add: Let_def CJNB_def split_def)
+ with qf show "qfree (CJNB qe p) \<and> Ifm bs (CJNB qe p) = Ifm bs (E p)" by blast
+qed
+
+consts qelim :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef qelim "measure fmsize"
+ "qelim (E p) = (\<lambda> qe. DJ (CJNB qe) (qelim p qe))"
+ "qelim (A p) = (\<lambda> qe. not (qe ((qelim (NOT p) qe))))"
+ "qelim (NOT p) = (\<lambda> qe. not (qelim p qe))"
+ "qelim (And p q) = (\<lambda> qe. conj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Or p q) = (\<lambda> qe. disj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Imp p q) = (\<lambda> qe. disj (qelim (NOT p) qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim (Iff p q) = (\<lambda> qe. iff (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
+ "qelim p = (\<lambda> y. simpfm p)"
+
+lemma qelim_ci:
+ assumes qe_inv: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> (Ifm bs (qe p) = Ifm bs (E p))"
+ shows "\<And> bs. qfree (qelim p qe) \<and> (Ifm bs (qelim p qe) = Ifm bs p)"
+using qe_inv DJ_qe[OF CJNB_qe[OF qe_inv]]
+by(induct p rule: qelim.induct)
+(auto simp del: simpfm.simps)
+
+
+text {* The @{text "\<int>"} Part *}
+text{* Linearity for fm where Bound 0 ranges over @{text "\<int>"} *}
+consts
+ zsplit0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<times> num" (* splits the bounded from the unbounded part*)
+recdef zsplit0 "measure num_size"
+ "zsplit0 (C c) = (0,C c)"
+ "zsplit0 (Bound n) = (if n=0 then (1, C 0) else (0,Bound n))"
+ "zsplit0 (CN n c a) = zsplit0 (Add (Mul c (Bound n)) a)"
+ "zsplit0 (CF c a b) = zsplit0 (Add (Mul c (Floor a)) b)"
+ "zsplit0 (Neg a) = (let (i',a') = zsplit0 a in (-i', Neg a'))"
+ "zsplit0 (Add a b) = (let (ia,a') = zsplit0 a ;
+ (ib,b') = zsplit0 b
+ in (ia+ib, Add a' b'))"
+ "zsplit0 (Sub a b) = (let (ia,a') = zsplit0 a ;
+ (ib,b') = zsplit0 b
+ in (ia-ib, Sub a' b'))"
+ "zsplit0 (Mul i a) = (let (i',a') = zsplit0 a in (i*i', Mul i a'))"
+ "zsplit0 (Floor a) = (let (i',a') = zsplit0 a in (i',Floor a'))"
+(hints simp add: Let_def)
+
+lemma zsplit0_I:
+ shows "\<And> n a. zsplit0 t = (n,a) \<Longrightarrow> (Inum ((real (x::int)) #bs) (CN 0 n a) = Inum (real x #bs) t) \<and> numbound0 a"
+ (is "\<And> n a. ?S t = (n,a) \<Longrightarrow> (?I x (CN 0 n a) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N a")
+proof(induct t rule: zsplit0.induct)
+ case (1 c n a) thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (2 m n a) thus ?case by (cases "m=0") auto
+next
+ case (3 n i a n a') thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (4 c a b n a') thus ?case by auto
+next
+ case (5 t n a)
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp hence th: "a=Neg ?at \<and> n=-?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abj prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ from th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (6 s t n a)
+ let ?ns = "fst (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?as = "snd (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abjs: "zsplit0 s = (?ns,?as)" by simp
+ moreover have abjt: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp
+ ultimately have th: "a=Add ?as ?at \<and> n=?ns + ?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abjs[symmetric] have bluddy: "\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s" by blast
+ from prems have "(\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>xa xb. zsplit0 t = (xa, xb) \<longrightarrow> Inum (real x # bs) (CN 0 xa xb) = Inum (real x # bs) t \<and> numbound0 xb)" by simp
+ with bluddy abjt have th3: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ from abjs prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?ns ?as) = ?I x s) \<and> ?N ?as" by blast
+ from th3[simplified] th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
+ by (simp add: left_distrib)
+next
+ case (7 s t n a)
+ let ?ns = "fst (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?as = "snd (zsplit0 s)"
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abjs: "zsplit0 s = (?ns,?as)" by simp
+ moreover have abjt: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp
+ ultimately have th: "a=Sub ?as ?at \<and> n=?ns - ?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abjs[symmetric] have bluddy: "\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s" by blast
+ from prems have "(\<exists> x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s) \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>xa xb. zsplit0 t = (xa, xb) \<longrightarrow> Inum (real x # bs) (CN 0 xa xb) = Inum (real x # bs) t \<and> numbound0 xb)" by simp
+ with bluddy abjt have th3: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ from abjs prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?ns ?as) = ?I x s) \<and> ?N ?as" by blast
+ from th3[simplified] th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
+ by (simp add: left_diff_distrib)
+next
+ case (8 i t n a)
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp hence th: "a=Mul i ?at \<and> n=i*?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abj prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ hence " ?I x (Mul i t) = (real i) * ?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ?I x (CN 0 (i*?nt) (Mul i ?at))" by (simp add: right_distrib)
+ finally show ?case using th th2 by simp
+next
+ case (9 t n a)
+ let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
+ let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
+ have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)" by simp hence th: "a= Floor ?at \<and> n=?nt" using prems
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ from abj prems have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at" by blast
+ hence na: "?N a" using th by simp
+ have th': "(real ?nt)*(real x) = real (?nt * x)" by simp
+ have "?I x (Floor t) = ?I x (Floor (CN 0 ?nt ?at))" using th2 by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (floor ((real ?nt)* real(x) + ?I x ?at))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (floor (?I x ?at + real (?nt* x)))" by (simp add: add_ac)
+ also have "\<dots> = real (floor (?I x ?at) + (?nt* x))"
+ using floor_add[where x="?I x ?at" and a="?nt* x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = real (?nt)*(real x) + real (floor (?I x ?at))" by (simp add: add_ac)
+ finally have "?I x (Floor t) = ?I x (CN 0 n a)" using th by simp
+ with na show ?case by simp
+qed
+
+consts
+ iszlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> real list \<Rightarrow> bool" (* Linearity test for fm *)
+ zlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Linearity transformation for fm *)
+recdef iszlfm "measure size"
+ "iszlfm (And p q) = (\<lambda> bs. iszlfm p bs \<and> iszlfm q bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Or p q) = (\<lambda> bs. iszlfm p bs \<and> iszlfm q bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =
+ (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> i>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=
+ (\<lambda> bs. c>0 \<and> i>0 \<and> numbound0 e \<and> isint e bs)"
+ "iszlfm p = (\<lambda> bs. isatom p \<and> (bound0 p))"
+
+lemma zlin_qfree: "iszlfm p bs \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
+ by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) auto
+
+lemma iszlfm_gen:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (x#bs)"
+ shows "\<forall> y. iszlfm p (y#bs)"
+proof
+ fix y
+ show "iszlfm p (y#bs)"
+ using lp
+ by(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct, simp_all add: numbound0_gen[rule_format, where x="x" and y="y"])
+qed
+
+lemma conj_zl[simp]: "iszlfm p bs \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm q bs \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (conj p q) bs"
+ using conj_def by (cases p,auto)
+lemma disj_zl[simp]: "iszlfm p bs \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm q bs \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (disj p q) bs"
+ using disj_def by (cases p,auto)
+lemma not_zl[simp]: "iszlfm p bs \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (not p) bs"
+ by (induct p rule:iszlfm.induct ,auto)
+
+recdef zlfm "measure fmsize"
+ "zlfm (And p q) = conj (zlfm p) (zlfm q)"
+ "zlfm (Or p q) = disj (zlfm p) (zlfm q)"
+ "zlfm (Imp p q) = disj (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm q)"
+ "zlfm (Iff p q) = disj (conj (zlfm p) (zlfm q)) (conj (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm (NOT q)))"
+ "zlfm (Lt a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Lt r else
+ if c>0 then Or (Lt (CN 0 c (Neg (Floor (Neg r))))) (And (Eq (CN 0 c (Neg (Floor (Neg r))))) (Lt (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r)))
+ else Or (Gt (CN 0 (-c) (Floor(Neg r)))) (And (Eq(CN 0 (-c) (Floor(Neg r)))) (Lt (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r))))"
+ "zlfm (Le a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Le r else
+ if c>0 then Or (Le (CN 0 c (Neg (Floor (Neg r))))) (And (Eq (CN 0 c (Neg (Floor (Neg r))))) (Lt (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r)))
+ else Or (Ge (CN 0 (-c) (Floor(Neg r)))) (And (Eq(CN 0 (-c) (Floor(Neg r)))) (Lt (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r))))"
+ "zlfm (Gt a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Gt r else
+ if c>0 then Or (Gt (CN 0 c (Floor r))) (And (Eq (CN 0 c (Floor r))) (Lt (Sub (Floor r) r)))
+ else Or (Lt (CN 0 (-c) (Neg (Floor r)))) (And (Eq(CN 0 (-c) (Neg (Floor r)))) (Lt (Sub (Floor r) r))))"
+ "zlfm (Ge a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Ge r else
+ if c>0 then Or (Ge (CN 0 c (Floor r))) (And (Eq (CN 0 c (Floor r))) (Lt (Sub (Floor r) r)))
+ else Or (Le (CN 0 (-c) (Neg (Floor r)))) (And (Eq(CN 0 (-c) (Neg (Floor r)))) (Lt (Sub (Floor r) r))))"
+ "zlfm (Eq a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Eq r else
+ if c>0 then (And (Eq (CN 0 c (Neg (Floor (Neg r))))) (Eq (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r)))
+ else (And (Eq (CN 0 (-c) (Floor (Neg r)))) (Eq (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r))))"
+ "zlfm (NEq a) = (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then NEq r else
+ if c>0 then (Or (NEq (CN 0 c (Neg (Floor (Neg r))))) (NEq (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r)))
+ else (Or (NEq (CN 0 (-c) (Floor (Neg r)))) (NEq (Add (Floor (Neg r)) r))))"
+ "zlfm (Dvd i a) = (if i=0 then zlfm (Eq a)
+ else (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then Dvd (abs i) r else
+ if c>0 then And (Eq (Sub (Floor r) r)) (Dvd (abs i) (CN 0 c (Floor r)))
+ else And (Eq (Sub (Floor r) r)) (Dvd (abs i) (CN 0 (-c) (Neg (Floor r))))))"
+ "zlfm (NDvd i a) = (if i=0 then zlfm (NEq a)
+ else (let (c,r) = zsplit0 a in
+ if c=0 then NDvd (abs i) r else
+ if c>0 then Or (NEq (Sub (Floor r) r)) (NDvd (abs i) (CN 0 c (Floor r)))
+ else Or (NEq (Sub (Floor r) r)) (NDvd (abs i) (CN 0 (-c) (Neg (Floor r))))))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (And p q)) = disj (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm (NOT q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Or p q)) = conj (zlfm (NOT p)) (zlfm (NOT q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Imp p q)) = conj (zlfm p) (zlfm (NOT q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Iff p q)) = disj (conj(zlfm p) (zlfm(NOT q))) (conj (zlfm(NOT p)) (zlfm q))"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NOT p)) = zlfm p"
+ "zlfm (NOT T) = F"
+ "zlfm (NOT F) = T"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Lt a)) = zlfm (Ge a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Le a)) = zlfm (Gt a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Gt a)) = zlfm (Le a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Ge a)) = zlfm (Lt a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Eq a)) = zlfm (NEq a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NEq a)) = zlfm (Eq a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (Dvd i a)) = zlfm (NDvd i a)"
+ "zlfm (NOT (NDvd i a)) = zlfm (Dvd i a)"
+ "zlfm p = p" (hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+
+lemma split_int_less_real:
+ "(real (a::int) < b) = (a < floor b \<or> (a = floor b \<and> real (floor b) < b))"
+proof( auto)
+ assume alb: "real a < b" and agb: "\<not> a < floor b"
+ from agb have "floor b \<le> a" by simp hence th: "b < real a + 1" by (simp only: floor_le_eq)
+ from floor_eq[OF alb th] show "a= floor b" by simp
+next
+ assume alb: "a < floor b"
+ hence "real a < real (floor b)" by simp
+ moreover have "real (floor b) \<le> b" by simp ultimately show "real a < b" by arith
+qed
+
+lemma split_int_less_real':
+ "(real (a::int) + b < 0) = (real a - real (floor(-b)) < 0 \<or> (real a - real (floor (-b)) = 0 \<and> real (floor (-b)) + b < 0))"
+proof-
+ have "(real a + b <0) = (real a < -b)" by arith
+ with split_int_less_real[where a="a" and b="-b"] show ?thesis by arith
+qed
+
+lemma split_int_gt_real':
+ "(real (a::int) + b > 0) = (real a + real (floor b) > 0 \<or> (real a + real (floor b) = 0 \<and> real (floor b) - b < 0))"
+proof-
+ have th: "(real a + b >0) = (real (-a) + (-b)< 0)" by arith
+ show ?thesis using myless[rule_format, where b="real (floor b)"]
+ by (simp only:th split_int_less_real'[where a="-a" and b="-b"])
+ (simp add: algebra_simps diff_def[symmetric],arith)
+qed
+
+lemma split_int_le_real:
+ "(real (a::int) \<le> b) = (a \<le> floor b \<or> (a = floor b \<and> real (floor b) < b))"
+proof( auto)
+ assume alb: "real a \<le> b" and agb: "\<not> a \<le> floor b"
+ from alb have "floor (real a) \<le> floor b " by (simp only: floor_mono2)
+ hence "a \<le> floor b" by simp with agb show "False" by simp
+next
+ assume alb: "a \<le> floor b"
+ hence "real a \<le> real (floor b)" by (simp only: floor_mono2)
+ also have "\<dots>\<le> b" by simp finally show "real a \<le> b" .
+qed
+
+lemma split_int_le_real':
+ "(real (a::int) + b \<le> 0) = (real a - real (floor(-b)) \<le> 0 \<or> (real a - real (floor (-b)) = 0 \<and> real (floor (-b)) + b < 0))"
+proof-
+ have "(real a + b \<le>0) = (real a \<le> -b)" by arith
+ with split_int_le_real[where a="a" and b="-b"] show ?thesis by arith
+qed
+
+lemma split_int_ge_real':
+ "(real (a::int) + b \<ge> 0) = (real a + real (floor b) \<ge> 0 \<or> (real a + real (floor b) = 0 \<and> real (floor b) - b < 0))"
+proof-
+ have th: "(real a + b \<ge>0) = (real (-a) + (-b) \<le> 0)" by arith
+ show ?thesis by (simp only: th split_int_le_real'[where a="-a" and b="-b"])
+ (simp add: algebra_simps diff_def[symmetric],arith)
+qed
+
+lemma split_int_eq_real: "(real (a::int) = b) = ( a = floor b \<and> b = real (floor b))" (is "?l = ?r")
+by auto
+
+lemma split_int_eq_real': "(real (a::int) + b = 0) = ( a - floor (-b) = 0 \<and> real (floor (-b)) + b = 0)" (is "?l = ?r")
+proof-
+ have "?l = (real a = -b)" by arith
+ with split_int_eq_real[where a="a" and b="-b"] show ?thesis by simp arith
+qed
+
+lemma zlfm_I:
+ assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "(Ifm (real i #bs) (zlfm p) = Ifm (real i# bs) p) \<and> iszlfm (zlfm p) (real (i::int) #bs)"
+ (is "(?I (?l p) = ?I p) \<and> ?L (?l p)")
+using qfp
+proof(induct p rule: zlfm.induct)
+ case (5 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "?c = 0 \<or> (?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" hence ?case using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def,case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Lt a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Lt a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) < 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Lt a)))" apply (simp only: split_int_less_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) by (simp add: Ia cp cnz Let_def split_def diff_def)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Lt a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Lt a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) < 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also from cn cnz have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Lt a)))" by (simp only: split_int_less_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia Let_def split_def diff_def[symmetric] add_ac, arith)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "?c = 0 \<or> (?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" hence ?case using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat",simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Le a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Le a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) \<le> 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Le a)))" by (simp only: split_int_le_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia cp cnz Let_def split_def diff_def)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Le a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Le a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) \<le> 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also from cn cnz have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Le a)))" by (simp only: split_int_le_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia Let_def split_def diff_def[symmetric] add_ac ,arith)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "?c = 0 \<or> (?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" hence ?case using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Gt a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Gt a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) > 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Gt a)))" by (simp only: split_int_gt_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia cp cnz Let_def split_def diff_def)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Gt a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Gt a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) > 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also from cn cnz have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Gt a)))" by (simp only: split_int_gt_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia Let_def split_def diff_def[symmetric] add_ac, arith)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "?c = 0 \<or> (?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" hence ?case using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Ge a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Ge a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) \<ge> 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Ge a)))" by (simp only: split_int_ge_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia cp cnz Let_def split_def diff_def)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Ge a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Ge a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) \<ge> 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also from cn cnz have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Ge a)))" by (simp only: split_int_ge_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Ia Let_def split_def diff_def[symmetric] add_ac, arith)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "?c = 0 \<or> (?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" hence ?case using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Eq a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Eq a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) = 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Eq a)))" using cp cnz by (simp only: split_int_eq_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Let_def split_def Ia real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Eq a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Eq a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) = 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also from cn cnz have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Eq a)))" by (simp only: split_int_eq_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Let_def split_def Ia real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult,arith)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (10 a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "?c = 0 \<or> (?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" hence ?case using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (NEq a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (NEq a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) \<noteq> 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (NEq a)))" using cp cnz by (simp only: split_int_eq_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Let_def split_def Ia real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (NEq a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (NEq a) = (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r) \<noteq> 0)" using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also from cn cnz have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (NEq a)))" by (simp only: split_int_eq_real'[where a="?c*i" and b="?N ?r"]) (simp add: Let_def split_def Ia real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult,arith)
+ finally have ?case using l by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (11 j a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "j=0 \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c = 0) \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (j\<noteq> 0 \<and> ?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "j=0" hence z: "zlfm (Dvd j a) = (zlfm (Eq a))" by (simp add: Let_def)
+ hence ?case using prems by (simp del: zlfm.simps add: rdvd_left_0_eq)}
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" and "j\<noteq>0" hence ?case
+ using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"] rdvd_abs1[where d="j"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Dvd j a) = (real j rdvd (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r)))"
+ using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (abs j) rdvd real (?c*i) + (?N ?r))"
+ by (simp only: rdvd_abs1[where d="j" and t="real (?c*i) + ?N ?r", symmetric]) simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((abs j) dvd (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) \<and>
+ (real (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) = (real (?c*i) + (?N ?r))))"
+ by(simp only: int_rdvd_real[where i="abs j" and x="real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)"]) (simp only: add_ac)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Dvd j a)))" using cp cnz jnz
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def int_rdvd_iff[symmetric]
+ del: real_of_int_mult) (auto simp add: add_ac)
+ finally have ?case using l jnz by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (Dvd j a) = (real j rdvd (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r)))"
+ using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (abs j) rdvd real (?c*i) + (?N ?r))"
+ by (simp only: rdvd_abs1[where d="j" and t="real (?c*i) + ?N ?r", symmetric]) simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((abs j) dvd (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) \<and>
+ (real (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) = (real (?c*i) + (?N ?r))))"
+ by(simp only: int_rdvd_real[where i="abs j" and x="real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)"]) (simp only: add_ac)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (Dvd j a)))" using cn cnz jnz
+ using rdvd_minus [where d="abs j" and t="real (?c*i + floor (?N ?r))", simplified, symmetric]
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def int_rdvd_iff[symmetric]
+ del: real_of_int_mult) (auto simp add: add_ac)
+ finally have ?case using l jnz by blast }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (12 j a)
+ let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
+ let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
+ have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)" by simp
+ from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
+ have Ia:"Inum (real i # bs) a = Inum (real i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r" by auto
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real i#bs) t"
+ have "j=0 \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c = 0) \<or> (j\<noteq>0 \<and> ?c >0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0) \<or> (j\<noteq> 0 \<and> ?c<0 \<and> ?c\<noteq>0)" by arith
+ moreover
+ {assume "j=0" hence z: "zlfm (NDvd j a) = (zlfm (NEq a))" by (simp add: Let_def)
+ hence ?case using prems by (simp del: zlfm.simps add: rdvd_left_0_eq)}
+ moreover
+ {assume "?c=0" and "j\<noteq>0" hence ?case
+ using zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"] rdvd_abs1[where d="j"]
+ by (cases "?r", simp_all add: Let_def split_def, case_tac "nat", simp_all)}
+ moreover
+ {assume cp: "?c > 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (NDvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (NDvd j a) = (\<not> (real j rdvd (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r))))"
+ using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> (real (abs j) rdvd real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)))"
+ by (simp only: rdvd_abs1[where d="j" and t="real (?c*i) + ?N ?r", symmetric]) simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> ((abs j) dvd (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) \<and>
+ (real (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) = (real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)))))"
+ by(simp only: int_rdvd_real[where i="abs j" and x="real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)"]) (simp only: add_ac)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (NDvd j a)))" using cp cnz jnz
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def int_rdvd_iff[symmetric]
+ del: real_of_int_mult) (auto simp add: add_ac)
+ finally have ?case using l jnz by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume cn: "?c < 0" and cnz: "?c\<noteq>0" and jnz: "j\<noteq>0" hence l: "?L (?l (NDvd j a))"
+ by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def isint_Floor isint_neg)
+ have "?I (NDvd j a) = (\<not> (real j rdvd (real (?c * i) + (?N ?r))))"
+ using Ia by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> (real (abs j) rdvd real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)))"
+ by (simp only: rdvd_abs1[where d="j" and t="real (?c*i) + ?N ?r", symmetric]) simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> ((abs j) dvd (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) \<and>
+ (real (floor ((?N ?r) + real (?c*i))) = (real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)))))"
+ by(simp only: int_rdvd_real[where i="abs j" and x="real (?c*i) + (?N ?r)"]) (simp only: add_ac)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I (?l (NDvd j a)))" using cn cnz jnz
+ using rdvd_minus [where d="abs j" and t="real (?c*i + floor (?N ?r))", simplified, symmetric]
+ by (simp add: Let_def split_def int_rdvd_iff[symmetric]
+ del: real_of_int_mult) (auto simp add: add_ac)
+ finally have ?case using l jnz by blast }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed auto
+
+text{* plusinf : Virtual substitution of @{text "+\<infinity>"}
+ minusinf: Virtual substitution of @{text "-\<infinity>"}
+ @{text "\<delta>"} Compute lcm @{text "d| Dvd d c*x+t \<in> p"}
+ @{text "d\<delta>"} checks if a given l divides all the ds above*}
+
+consts
+ plusinf:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ minusinf:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ \<delta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int"
+ d\<delta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool"
+
+recdef minusinf "measure size"
+ "minusinf (And p q) = conj (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
+ "minusinf (Or p q) = disj (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
+ "minusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "minusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "minusinf p = p"
+
+lemma minusinf_qfree: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (minusinf p)"
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto)
+
+recdef plusinf "measure size"
+ "plusinf (And p q) = conj (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
+ "plusinf (Or p q) = disj (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
+ "plusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = F"
+ "plusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = T"
+ "plusinf p = p"
+
+recdef \<delta> "measure size"
+ "\<delta> (And p q) = zlcm (\<delta> p) (\<delta> q)"
+ "\<delta> (Or p q) = zlcm (\<delta> p) (\<delta> q)"
+ "\<delta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = i"
+ "\<delta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = i"
+ "\<delta> p = 1"
+
+recdef d\<delta> "measure size"
+ "d\<delta> (And p q) = (\<lambda> d. d\<delta> p d \<and> d\<delta> q d)"
+ "d\<delta> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> d. d\<delta> p d \<and> d\<delta> q d)"
+ "d\<delta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> d. i dvd d)"
+ "d\<delta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> d. i dvd d)"
+ "d\<delta> p = (\<lambda> d. True)"
+
+lemma delta_mono:
+ assumes lin: "iszlfm p bs"
+ and d: "d dvd d'"
+ and ad: "d\<delta> p d"
+ shows "d\<delta> p d'"
+ using lin ad d
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (9 i c e) thus ?case using d
+ by (simp add: zdvd_trans[where m="i" and n="d" and k="d'"])
+next
+ case (10 i c e) thus ?case using d
+ by (simp add: zdvd_trans[where m="i" and n="d" and k="d'"])
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma \<delta> : assumes lin:"iszlfm p bs"
+ shows "d\<delta> p (\<delta> p) \<and> \<delta> p >0"
+using lin
+proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (1 p q)
+ let ?d = "\<delta> (And p q)"
+ from prems zlcm_pos have dp: "?d >0" by simp
+ have d1: "\<delta> p dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp
+ hence th: "d\<delta> p ?d"
+ using delta_mono prems by (auto simp del: dvd_zlcm_self1)
+ have "\<delta> q dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp
+ hence th': "d\<delta> q ?d" using delta_mono prems by (auto simp del: dvd_zlcm_self2)
+ from th th' dp show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (2 p q)
+ let ?d = "\<delta> (And p q)"
+ from prems zlcm_pos have dp: "?d >0" by simp
+ have "\<delta> p dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp hence th: "d\<delta> p ?d" using delta_mono prems
+ by (auto simp del: dvd_zlcm_self1)
+ have "\<delta> q dvd \<delta> (And p q)" using prems by simp hence th': "d\<delta> q ?d" using delta_mono prems by (auto simp del: dvd_zlcm_self2)
+ from th th' dp show ?case by simp
+qed simp_all
+
+
+lemma minusinf_inf:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p (a # bs)"
+ shows "\<exists> (z::int). \<forall> x < z. Ifm ((real x)#bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm ((real x)#bs) p"
+ (is "?P p" is "\<exists> (z::int). \<forall> x < z. ?I x (?M p) = ?I x p")
+using linp
+proof (induct p rule: minusinf.induct)
+ case (1 f g)
+ from prems have "?P f" by simp
+ then obtain z1 where z1_def: "\<forall> x < z1. ?I x (?M f) = ?I x f" by blast
+ from prems have "?P g" by simp
+ then obtain z2 where z2_def: "\<forall> x < z2. ?I x (?M g) = ?I x g" by blast
+ let ?z = "min z1 z2"
+ from z1_def z2_def have "\<forall> x < ?z. ?I x (?M (And f g)) = ?I x (And f g)" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (2 f g) from prems have "?P f" by simp
+ then obtain z1 where z1_def: "\<forall> x < z1. ?I x (?M f) = ?I x f" by blast
+ from prems have "?P g" by simp
+ then obtain z2 where z2_def: "\<forall> x < z2. ?I x (?M g) = ?I x g" by blast
+ let ?z = "min z1 z2"
+ from z1_def z2_def have "\<forall> x < ?z. ?I x (?M (Or f g)) = ?I x (Or f g)" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have "c > 0" by simp hence rcpos: "real c > 0" by simp
+ from prems have nbe: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ fix y
+ have "\<forall> x < (floor (- (Inum (y#bs) e) / (real c))). ?I x (?M (Eq (CN 0 c e))) = ?I x (Eq (CN 0 c e))"
+ proof (simp add: less_floor_eq , rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x
+ assume A: "real x + (1\<Colon>real) \<le> - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)"
+ hence th1:"real x < - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)" by simp
+ with rcpos have "(real c)*(real x) < (real c)*(- (Inum (y # bs) e / real c))"
+ by (simp only: real_mult_less_mono2[OF rcpos th1])
+ hence "real c * real x + Inum (y # bs) e \<noteq> 0"using rcpos by simp
+ thus "real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nbe, where b="y" and bs="bs" and b'="real x"] by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have "c > 0" by simp hence rcpos: "real c > 0" by simp
+ from prems have nbe: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ fix y
+ have "\<forall> x < (floor (- (Inum (y#bs) e) / (real c))). ?I x (?M (NEq (CN 0 c e))) = ?I x (NEq (CN 0 c e))"
+ proof (simp add: less_floor_eq , rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x
+ assume A: "real x + (1\<Colon>real) \<le> - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)"
+ hence th1:"real x < - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)" by simp
+ with rcpos have "(real c)*(real x) < (real c)*(- (Inum (y # bs) e / real c))"
+ by (simp only: real_mult_less_mono2[OF rcpos th1])
+ hence "real c * real x + Inum (y # bs) e \<noteq> 0"using rcpos by simp
+ thus "real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nbe, where b="y" and bs="bs" and b'="real x"] by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have "c > 0" by simp hence rcpos: "real c > 0" by simp
+ from prems have nbe: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ fix y
+ have "\<forall> x < (floor (- (Inum (y#bs) e) / (real c))). ?I x (?M (Lt (CN 0 c e))) = ?I x (Lt (CN 0 c e))"
+ proof (simp add: less_floor_eq , rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x
+ assume A: "real x + (1\<Colon>real) \<le> - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)"
+ hence th1:"real x < - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)" by simp
+ with rcpos have "(real c)*(real x) < (real c)*(- (Inum (y # bs) e / real c))"
+ by (simp only: real_mult_less_mono2[OF rcpos th1])
+ thus "real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e < 0"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nbe, where b="y" and bs="bs" and b'="real x"] rcpos by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have "c > 0" by simp hence rcpos: "real c > 0" by simp
+ from prems have nbe: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ fix y
+ have "\<forall> x < (floor (- (Inum (y#bs) e) / (real c))). ?I x (?M (Le (CN 0 c e))) = ?I x (Le (CN 0 c e))"
+ proof (simp add: less_floor_eq , rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x
+ assume A: "real x + (1\<Colon>real) \<le> - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)"
+ hence th1:"real x < - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)" by simp
+ with rcpos have "(real c)*(real x) < (real c)*(- (Inum (y # bs) e / real c))"
+ by (simp only: real_mult_less_mono2[OF rcpos th1])
+ thus "real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<le> 0"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nbe, where b="y" and bs="bs" and b'="real x"] rcpos by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have "c > 0" by simp hence rcpos: "real c > 0" by simp
+ from prems have nbe: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ fix y
+ have "\<forall> x < (floor (- (Inum (y#bs) e) / (real c))). ?I x (?M (Gt (CN 0 c e))) = ?I x (Gt (CN 0 c e))"
+ proof (simp add: less_floor_eq , rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x
+ assume A: "real x + (1\<Colon>real) \<le> - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)"
+ hence th1:"real x < - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)" by simp
+ with rcpos have "(real c)*(real x) < (real c)*(- (Inum (y # bs) e / real c))"
+ by (simp only: real_mult_less_mono2[OF rcpos th1])
+ thus "\<not> (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e>0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nbe, where b="y" and bs="bs" and b'="real x"] rcpos by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have "c > 0" by simp hence rcpos: "real c > 0" by simp
+ from prems have nbe: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ fix y
+ have "\<forall> x < (floor (- (Inum (y#bs) e) / (real c))). ?I x (?M (Ge (CN 0 c e))) = ?I x (Ge (CN 0 c e))"
+ proof (simp add: less_floor_eq , rule allI, rule impI)
+ fix x
+ assume A: "real x + (1\<Colon>real) \<le> - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)"
+ hence th1:"real x < - (Inum (y # bs) e / real c)" by simp
+ with rcpos have "(real c)*(real x) < (real c)*(- (Inum (y # bs) e / real c))"
+ by (simp only: real_mult_less_mono2[OF rcpos th1])
+ thus "\<not> real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<ge> 0"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nbe, where b="y" and bs="bs" and b'="real x"] rcpos by simp
+ qed
+ thus ?case by blast
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma minusinf_repeats:
+ assumes d: "d\<delta> p d" and linp: "iszlfm p (a # bs)"
+ shows "Ifm ((real(x - k*d))#bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm (real x #bs) (minusinf p)"
+using linp d
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (9 i c e) hence nbe: "numbound0 e" and id: "i dvd d" by simp+
+ hence "\<exists> k. d=i*k" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ then obtain "di" where di_def: "d=i*di" by blast
+ show ?case
+ proof(simp add: numbound0_I[OF nbe,where bs="bs" and b="real x - real k * real d" and b'="real x"] right_diff_distrib, rule iffI)
+ assume
+ "real i rdvd real c * real x - real c * (real k * real d) + Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ (is "?ri rdvd ?rc*?rx - ?rc*(?rk*?rd) + ?I x e" is "?ri rdvd ?rt")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rt = ?ri * (real l)" by (simp add: rdvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+ ?I x e = ?ri*(real l)+?rc*(?rk * (real i) * (real di))"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+ ?I x e = ?ri*(real (l + c*k*di))"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+ ?I x e = ?ri* (real l)" by blast
+ thus "real i rdvd real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e" using rdvd_def by simp
+ next
+ assume
+ "real i rdvd real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e" (is "?ri rdvd ?rc*?rx+?e")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+?e = ?ri * (real l)" by (simp add: rdvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real l) - real c * (real k * real d)" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real l) - real c * (real k * real i * real di)" by (simp add: di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real (l - c*k*di))" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real l)"
+ by blast
+ thus "real i rdvd real c * real x - real c * (real k * real d) + Inum (real x # bs) e" using rdvd_def by simp
+ qed
+next
+ case (10 i c e) hence nbe: "numbound0 e" and id: "i dvd d" by simp+
+ hence "\<exists> k. d=i*k" by (simp add: dvd_def)
+ then obtain "di" where di_def: "d=i*di" by blast
+ show ?case
+ proof(simp add: numbound0_I[OF nbe,where bs="bs" and b="real x - real k * real d" and b'="real x"] right_diff_distrib, rule iffI)
+ assume
+ "real i rdvd real c * real x - real c * (real k * real d) + Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ (is "?ri rdvd ?rc*?rx - ?rc*(?rk*?rd) + ?I x e" is "?ri rdvd ?rt")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rt = ?ri * (real l)" by (simp add: rdvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+ ?I x e = ?ri*(real l)+?rc*(?rk * (real i) * (real di))"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+ ?I x e = ?ri*(real (l + c*k*di))"
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+ ?I x e = ?ri* (real l)" by blast
+ thus "real i rdvd real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e" using rdvd_def by simp
+ next
+ assume
+ "real i rdvd real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e" (is "?ri rdvd ?rc*?rx+?e")
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx+?e = ?ri * (real l)" by (simp add: rdvd_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real l) - real c * (real k * real d)" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real l) - real c * (real k * real i * real di)" by (simp add: di_def)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real (l - c*k*di))" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (l::int). ?rc*?rx - real c * (real k * real d) +?e = ?ri * (real l)"
+ by blast
+ thus "real i rdvd real c * real x - real c * (real k * real d) + Inum (real x # bs) e" using rdvd_def by simp
+ qed
+qed (auto simp add: nth_pos2 numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real(x - k*d)" and b'="real x"] simp del: real_of_int_mult real_of_int_diff)
+
+lemma minusinf_ex:
+ assumes lin: "iszlfm p (real (a::int) #bs)"
+ and exmi: "\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) (minusinf p)" (is "\<exists> x. ?P1 x")
+ shows "\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> x. ?P x")
+proof-
+ let ?d = "\<delta> p"
+ from \<delta> [OF lin] have dpos: "?d >0" by simp
+ from \<delta> [OF lin] have alld: "d\<delta> p ?d" by simp
+ from minusinf_repeats[OF alld lin] have th1:"\<forall> x k. ?P1 x = ?P1 (x - (k * ?d))" by simp
+ from minusinf_inf[OF lin] have th2:"\<exists> z. \<forall> x. x<z \<longrightarrow> (?P x = ?P1 x)" by blast
+ from minusinfinity [OF dpos th1 th2] exmi show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma minusinf_bex:
+ assumes lin: "iszlfm p (real (a::int) #bs)"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) (minusinf p)) =
+ (\<exists> (x::int)\<in> {1..\<delta> p}. Ifm (real x#bs) (minusinf p))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?P x) = _")
+proof-
+ let ?d = "\<delta> p"
+ from \<delta> [OF lin] have dpos: "?d >0" by simp
+ from \<delta> [OF lin] have alld: "d\<delta> p ?d" by simp
+ from minusinf_repeats[OF alld lin] have th1:"\<forall> x k. ?P x = ?P (x - (k * ?d))" by simp
+ from periodic_finite_ex[OF dpos th1] show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma dvd1_eq1: "x >0 \<Longrightarrow> (x::int) dvd 1 = (x = 1)" by auto
+
+consts
+ a\<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> fm" (* adjusts the coeffitients of a formula *)
+ d\<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool" (* tests if all coeffs c of c divide a given l*)
+ \<zeta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int" (* computes the lcm of all coefficients of x*)
+ \<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> num list"
+ \<alpha> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> num list"
+
+recdef a\<beta> "measure size"
+ "a\<beta> (And p q) = (\<lambda> k. And (a\<beta> p k) (a\<beta> q k))"
+ "a\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> k. Or (a\<beta> p k) (a\<beta> q k))"
+ "a\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Eq (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. NEq (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Lt (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Le (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Gt (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. Ge (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =(\<lambda> k. Dvd ((k div c)*i) (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=(\<lambda> k. NDvd ((k div c)*i) (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e)))"
+ "a\<beta> p = (\<lambda> k. p)"
+
+recdef d\<beta> "measure size"
+ "d\<beta> (And p q) = (\<lambda> k. (d\<beta> p k) \<and> (d\<beta> q k))"
+ "d\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> k. (d\<beta> p k) \<and> (d\<beta> q k))"
+ "d\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =(\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=(\<lambda> k. c dvd k)"
+ "d\<beta> p = (\<lambda> k. True)"
+
+recdef \<zeta> "measure size"
+ "\<zeta> (And p q) = zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
+ "\<zeta> (Or p q) = zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
+ "\<zeta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = c"
+ "\<zeta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))= c"
+ "\<zeta> p = 1"
+
+recdef \<beta> "measure size"
+ "\<beta> (And p q) = (\<beta> p @ \<beta> q)"
+ "\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<beta> p @ \<beta> q)"
+ "\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [Sub (C -1) e]"
+ "\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [Neg e]"
+ "\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = [Neg e]"
+ "\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = [Sub (C -1) e]"
+ "\<beta> p = []"
+
+recdef \<alpha> "measure size"
+ "\<alpha> (And p q) = (\<alpha> p @ \<alpha> q)"
+ "\<alpha> (Or p q) = (\<alpha> p @ \<alpha> q)"
+ "\<alpha> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [Add (C -1) e]"
+ "\<alpha> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [e]"
+ "\<alpha> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = [e]"
+ "\<alpha> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = [Add (C -1) e]"
+ "\<alpha> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<alpha> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<alpha> p = []"
+consts mirror :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef mirror "measure size"
+ "mirror (And p q) = And (mirror p) (mirror q)"
+ "mirror (Or p q) = Or (mirror p) (mirror q)"
+ "mirror (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = Eq (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = NEq (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = Gt (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Le (CN 0 c e)) = Ge (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = Lt (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = Le (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = Dvd i (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = NDvd i (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
+ "mirror p = p"
+
+lemma mirror\<alpha>\<beta>:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)"
+ shows "(Inum (real (i::int)#bs)) ` set (\<alpha> p) = (Inum (real i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> (mirror p))"
+using lp
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct, auto)
+
+lemma mirror:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)"
+ shows "Ifm (real (x::int)#bs) (mirror p) = Ifm (real (- x)#bs) p"
+using lp
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (9 j c e)
+ have th: "(real j rdvd real c * real x - Inum (real x # bs) e) =
+ (real j rdvd - (real c * real x - Inum (real x # bs) e))"
+ by (simp only: rdvd_minus[symmetric])
+ from prems th show ?case
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps
+ numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b'="real x" and b="- real x"])
+next
+ case (10 j c e)
+ have th: "(real j rdvd real c * real x - Inum (real x # bs) e) =
+ (real j rdvd - (real c * real x - Inum (real x # bs) e))"
+ by (simp only: rdvd_minus[symmetric])
+ from prems th show ?case
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps
+ numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b'="real x" and b="- real x"])
+qed (auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real x" and b'="- real x"] nth_pos2)
+
+lemma mirror_l: "iszlfm p (a#bs) \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (mirror p) (a#bs)"
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct, auto simp add: isint_neg)
+
+lemma mirror_d\<beta>: "iszlfm p (a#bs) \<and> d\<beta> p 1
+ \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (mirror p) (a#bs) \<and> d\<beta> (mirror p) 1"
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct, auto simp add: isint_neg)
+
+lemma mirror_\<delta>: "iszlfm p (a#bs) \<Longrightarrow> \<delta> (mirror p) = \<delta> p"
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct,auto)
+
+
+lemma mirror_ex:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) (mirror p)) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p)"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x ?mp) = (\<exists> x. ?I x p)")
+proof(auto)
+ fix x assume "?I x ?mp" hence "?I (- x) p" using mirror[OF lp] by blast
+ thus "\<exists> x. ?I x p" by blast
+next
+ fix x assume "?I x p" hence "?I (- x) ?mp"
+ using mirror[OF lp, where x="- x", symmetric] by auto
+ thus "\<exists> x. ?I x ?mp" by blast
+qed
+
+lemma \<beta>_numbound0: assumes lp: "iszlfm p bs"
+ shows "\<forall> b\<in> set (\<beta> p). numbound0 b"
+ using lp by (induct p rule: \<beta>.induct,auto)
+
+lemma d\<beta>_mono:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p (a #bs)"
+ and dr: "d\<beta> p l"
+ and d: "l dvd l'"
+ shows "d\<beta> p l'"
+using dr linp zdvd_trans[where n="l" and k="l'", simplified d]
+by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma \<alpha>_l: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)"
+ shows "\<forall> b\<in> set (\<alpha> p). numbound0 b \<and> isint b (a#bs)"
+using lp
+by(induct p rule: \<alpha>.induct, auto simp add: isint_add isint_c)
+
+lemma \<zeta>:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p (a #bs)"
+ shows "\<zeta> p > 0 \<and> d\<beta> p (\<zeta> p)"
+using linp
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (1 p q)
+ from prems have dl1: "\<zeta> p dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems have dl2: "\<zeta> q dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems d\<beta>_mono[where p = "p" and l="\<zeta> p" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ d\<beta>_mono[where p = "q" and l="\<zeta> q" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ dl1 dl2 show ?case by (auto simp add: zlcm_pos)
+next
+ case (2 p q)
+ from prems have dl1: "\<zeta> p dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems have dl2: "\<zeta> q dvd zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)" by simp
+ from prems d\<beta>_mono[where p = "p" and l="\<zeta> p" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ d\<beta>_mono[where p = "q" and l="\<zeta> q" and l'="zlcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
+ dl1 dl2 show ?case by (auto simp add: zlcm_pos)
+qed (auto simp add: zlcm_pos)
+
+lemma a\<beta>: assumes linp: "iszlfm p (a #bs)" and d: "d\<beta> p l" and lp: "l > 0"
+ shows "iszlfm (a\<beta> p l) (a #bs) \<and> d\<beta> (a\<beta> p l) 1 \<and> (Ifm (real (l * x) #bs) (a\<beta> p l) = Ifm ((real x)#bs) p)"
+using linp d
+proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (5 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e < (0\<Colon>real)) =
+ (real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e < 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e) < (real (l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e < 0)"
+ using mult_less_0_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] be isint_Mul[OF ei] by simp
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e \<le> (0\<Colon>real)) =
+ (real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e \<le> 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e) \<le> (real (l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<le> 0)"
+ using mult_le_0_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] be isint_Mul[OF ei] by simp
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e > (0\<Colon>real)) =
+ (real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e > 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e) > (real (l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e > 0)"
+ using zero_less_mult_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] be isint_Mul[OF ei] by simp
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e \<ge> (0\<Colon>real)) =
+ (real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e \<ge> 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e) \<ge> (real (l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<ge> 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] be isint_Mul[OF ei] by simp
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e = (0\<Colon>real)) =
+ (real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e = 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e) = (real (l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e = 0)"
+ using mult_eq_0_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] be isint_Mul[OF ei] by simp
+next
+ case (4 c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e \<noteq> (0\<Colon>real)) =
+ (real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e \<noteq> 0)"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e) \<noteq> (real (l div c)) * 0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e \<noteq> 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] be isint_Mul[OF ei] by simp
+next
+ case (9 j c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and jp: "j > 0" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(\<exists> (k::int). real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e = (real (l div c) * real j) * real k) = (\<exists> (k::int). real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e = (real (l div c) * real j) * real k)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e - real j * real k) = real (l div c)*0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also fix k have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e - real j * real k = 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e - real j * real k"] ldcp by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e = real j * real k)" by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] rdvd_def be isint_Mul[OF ei] mult_strict_mono[OF ldcp jp ldcp ] by simp
+next
+ case (10 j c e) hence cp: "c>0" and be: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (a#bs)" and jp: "j > 0" and d': "c dvd l" by simp+
+ from lp cp have clel: "c\<le>l" by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
+ from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "c div c\<le> l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
+ then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
+ by (simp add: zdiv_self[OF cnz])
+ have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c" using d' zdvd_iff_zmod_eq_0[where m="c" and n="l"] by simp
+ hence cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using zmod_zdiv_equality[where a="l" and b="c", symmetric]
+ by simp
+ hence "(\<exists> (k::int). real l * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e = (real (l div c) * real j) * real k) = (\<exists> (k::int). real (c * (l div c)) * real x + real (l div c) * Inum (real x # bs) e = (real (l div c) * real j) * real k)" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). real (l div c) * (real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e - real j * real k) = real (l div c)*0)" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also fix k have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e - real j * real k = 0)"
+ using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="real (l div c)" and b="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e - real j * real k"] ldcp by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (k::int). real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e = real j * real k)" by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] rdvd_def be isint_Mul[OF ei] mult_strict_mono[OF ldcp jp ldcp ] by simp
+qed (simp_all add: nth_pos2 numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real (l * x)" and b'="real x"] isint_Mul del: real_of_int_mult)
+
+lemma a\<beta>_ex: assumes linp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)" and d: "d\<beta> p l" and lp: "l>0"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. l dvd x \<and> Ifm (real x #bs) (a\<beta> p l)) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p)"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. l dvd x \<and> ?P x) = (\<exists> x. ?P' x)")
+proof-
+ have "(\<exists> x. l dvd x \<and> ?P x) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?P (l*x))"
+ using unity_coeff_ex[where l="l" and P="?P", simplified] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (x::int). ?P' x)" using a\<beta>[OF linp d lp] by simp
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma \<beta>:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ and nob: "\<not>(\<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists> b\<in> (Inum (a#bs)) ` set(\<beta> p). real x = b + real j)"
+ and p: "Ifm (real x#bs) p" (is "?P x")
+ shows "?P (x - d)"
+using lp u d dp nob p
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (5 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ with dp p c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real (x-d)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] prems
+ show ?case by (simp del: real_of_int_minus)
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ with dp p c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real (x-d)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] prems
+ show ?case by (simp del: real_of_int_minus)
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence p: "Ifm (real x #bs) (Gt (CN 0 c e))" and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" and ie1:"isint e (a#bs)" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ from ie1 have ie: "real (floor ?e) = ?e" using isint_iff[where n="e" and bs="a#bs"]
+ numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"]
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ {assume "real (x-d) +?e > 0" hence ?case using c1
+ numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real (x-d)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"]
+ by (simp del: real_of_int_minus)}
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "\<not> real (x-d) + ?e > 0"
+ let ?v="Neg e"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ from prems(11)[simplified simp_thms Inum.simps \<beta>.simps set.simps bex_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"]]
+ have nob: "\<not> (\<exists> j\<in> {1 ..d}. real x = - ?e + real j)" by auto
+ from H p have "real x + ?e > 0 \<and> real x + ?e \<le> real d" by (simp add: c1)
+ hence "real (x + floor ?e) > real (0::int) \<and> real (x + floor ?e) \<le> real d"
+ using ie by simp
+ hence "x + floor ?e \<ge> 1 \<and> x + floor ?e \<le> d" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. j = x + floor ?e" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. real x = real (- floor ?e + j)"
+ by (simp only: real_of_int_inject) (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. real x = - ?e + real j"
+ by (simp add: ie[simplified isint_iff])
+ with nob have ?case by auto}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence p: "Ifm (real x #bs) (Ge (CN 0 c e))" and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e"
+ and ie1:"isint e (a #bs)" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ from ie1 have ie: "real (floor ?e) = ?e" using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real x" and b'="a" and bs="bs"] isint_iff[where n="e" and bs="(real x)#bs"]
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ {assume "real (x-d) +?e \<ge> 0" hence ?case using c1
+ numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real (x-d)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"]
+ by (simp del: real_of_int_minus)}
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "\<not> real (x-d) + ?e \<ge> 0"
+ let ?v="Sub (C -1) e"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ from prems(11)[simplified simp_thms Inum.simps \<beta>.simps set.simps bex_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"]]
+ have nob: "\<not> (\<exists> j\<in> {1 ..d}. real x = - ?e - 1 + real j)" by auto
+ from H p have "real x + ?e \<ge> 0 \<and> real x + ?e < real d" by (simp add: c1)
+ hence "real (x + floor ?e) \<ge> real (0::int) \<and> real (x + floor ?e) < real d"
+ using ie by simp
+ hence "x + floor ?e +1 \<ge> 1 \<and> x + floor ?e + 1 \<le> d" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. j = x + floor ?e + 1" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. x= - floor ?e - 1 + j" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. real x= real (- floor ?e - 1 + j)"
+ by (simp only: real_of_int_inject)
+ hence "\<exists> (j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. real x= - ?e - 1 + real j"
+ by (simp add: ie[simplified isint_iff])
+ with nob have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence p: "Ifm (real x #bs) (Eq (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1"
+ and bn:"numbound0 e" and ie1: "isint e (a #bs)" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ let ?v="(Sub (C -1) e)"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ from p have "real x= - ?e" by (simp add: c1) with prems(11) show ?case using dp
+ by simp (erule ballE[where x="1"],
+ simp_all add:algebra_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real x"and b'="a"and bs="bs"])
+next
+ case (4 c e)hence p: "Ifm (real x #bs) (NEq (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1"
+ and bn:"numbound0 e" and ie1: "isint e (a #bs)" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ let ?v="Neg e"
+ have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)))" by simp
+ {assume "real x - real d + Inum ((real (x -d)) # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
+ hence ?case by (simp add: c1)}
+ moreover
+ {assume H: "real x - real d + Inum ((real (x -d)) # bs) e = 0"
+ hence "real x = - Inum ((real (x -d)) # bs) e + real d" by simp
+ hence "real x = - Inum (a # bs) e + real d"
+ by (simp add: numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real x - real d"and b'="a"and bs="bs"])
+ with prems(11) have ?case using dp by simp}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 j c e) hence p: "Ifm (real x #bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1"
+ and bn:"numbound0 e" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ from prems have "isint e (a #bs)" by simp
+ hence ie: "real (floor ?e) = ?e" using isint_iff[where n="e" and bs="(real x)#bs"] numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real x" and b'="a" and bs="bs"]
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ from prems have id: "j dvd d" by simp
+ from c1 ie[symmetric] have "?p x = (real j rdvd real (x+ floor ?e))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd x + floor ?e)"
+ using int_rdvd_real[where i="j" and x="real (x+ floor ?e)"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd x - d + floor ?e)"
+ using dvd_period[OF id, where x="x" and c="-1" and t="floor ?e"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real j rdvd real (x - d + floor ?e))"
+ using int_rdvd_real[where i="j" and x="real (x-d + floor ?e)",symmetric, simplified]
+ ie by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real j rdvd real x - real d + ?e)"
+ using ie by simp
+ finally show ?case
+ using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real (x-d)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] c1 p by simp
+next
+ case (10 j c e) hence p: "Ifm (real x #bs) (NDvd j (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x") and c1: "c=1" and bn:"numbound0 e" using dvd1_eq1[where x="c"] by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x # bs) e"
+ from prems have "isint e (a#bs)" by simp
+ hence ie: "real (floor ?e) = ?e" using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real x" and b'="a" and bs="bs"] isint_iff[where n="e" and bs="(real x)#bs"]
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ from prems have id: "j dvd d" by simp
+ from c1 ie[symmetric] have "?p x = (\<not> real j rdvd real (x+ floor ?e))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> j dvd x + floor ?e)"
+ using int_rdvd_real[where i="j" and x="real (x+ floor ?e)"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> j dvd x - d + floor ?e)"
+ using dvd_period[OF id, where x="x" and c="-1" and t="floor ?e"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> real j rdvd real (x - d + floor ?e))"
+ using int_rdvd_real[where i="j" and x="real (x-d + floor ?e)",symmetric, simplified]
+ ie by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> real j rdvd real x - real d + ?e)"
+ using ie by simp
+ finally show ?case using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real (x-d)" and b'="real x" and bs="bs"] c1 p by simp
+qed (auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real (x - d)" and b'="real x"] nth_pos2 simp del: real_of_int_diff)
+
+lemma \<beta>':
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a #bs)"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "\<forall> x. \<not>(\<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists> b\<in> set(\<beta> p). Ifm ((Inum (a#bs) b + real j) #bs) p) \<longrightarrow> Ifm (real x#bs) p \<longrightarrow> Ifm (real (x - d)#bs) p" (is "\<forall> x. ?b \<longrightarrow> ?P x \<longrightarrow> ?P (x - d)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix x
+ assume nb:"?b" and px: "?P x"
+ hence nb2: "\<not>(\<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists> b\<in> (Inum (a#bs)) ` set(\<beta> p). real x = b + real j)"
+ by auto
+ from \<beta>[OF lp u d dp nb2 px] show "?P (x -d )" .
+qed
+
+lemma \<beta>_int: assumes lp: "iszlfm p bs"
+ shows "\<forall> b\<in> set (\<beta> p). isint b bs"
+using lp by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) (auto simp add: isint_neg isint_sub)
+
+lemma cpmi_eq: "0 < D \<Longrightarrow> (EX z::int. ALL x. x < z --> (P x = P1 x))
+==> ALL x.~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. P(b+j)) --> P (x) --> P (x - D)
+==> (ALL (x::int). ALL (k::int). ((P1 x)= (P1 (x-k*D))))
+==> (EX (x::int). P(x)) = ((EX (j::int) : {1..D} . (P1(j))) | (EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. P (b+j)))"
+apply(rule iffI)
+prefer 2
+apply(drule minusinfinity)
+apply assumption+
+apply(fastsimp)
+apply clarsimp
+apply(subgoal_tac "!!k. 0<=k \<Longrightarrow> !x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - k*D)")
+apply(frule_tac x = x and z=z in decr_lemma)
+apply(subgoal_tac "P1(x - (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1) * D)")
+prefer 2
+apply(subgoal_tac "0 <= (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)")
+prefer 2 apply arith
+ apply fastsimp
+apply(drule (1) periodic_finite_ex)
+apply blast
+apply(blast dest:decr_mult_lemma)
+done
+
+
+theorem cp_thm:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a #bs)"
+ and u: "d\<beta> p 1"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x #bs) p) = (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. d}. Ifm (real j #bs) (minusinf p) \<or> (\<exists> b \<in> set (\<beta> p). Ifm ((Inum (a#bs) b + real j) #bs) p))"
+ (is "(\<exists> (x::int). ?P (real x)) = (\<exists> j\<in> ?D. ?M j \<or> (\<exists> b\<in> ?B. ?P (?I b + real j)))")
+proof-
+ from minusinf_inf[OF lp]
+ have th: "\<exists>(z::int). \<forall>x<z. ?P (real x) = ?M x" by blast
+ let ?B' = "{floor (?I b) | b. b\<in> ?B}"
+ from \<beta>_int[OF lp] isint_iff[where bs="a # bs"] have B: "\<forall> b\<in> ?B. real (floor (?I b)) = ?I b" by simp
+ from B[rule_format]
+ have "(\<exists>j\<in>?D. \<exists>b\<in> ?B. ?P (?I b + real j)) = (\<exists>j\<in>?D. \<exists>b\<in> ?B. ?P (real (floor (?I b)) + real j))"
+ by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists>j\<in>?D. \<exists>b\<in> ?B. ?P (real (floor (?I b) + j)))" by simp
+ also have"\<dots> = (\<exists> j \<in> ?D. \<exists> b \<in> ?B'. ?P (real (b + j)))" by blast
+ finally have BB':
+ "(\<exists>j\<in>?D. \<exists>b\<in> ?B. ?P (?I b + real j)) = (\<exists> j \<in> ?D. \<exists> b \<in> ?B'. ?P (real (b + j)))"
+ by blast
+ hence th2: "\<forall> x. \<not> (\<exists> j \<in> ?D. \<exists> b \<in> ?B'. ?P (real (b + j))) \<longrightarrow> ?P (real x) \<longrightarrow> ?P (real (x - d))" using \<beta>'[OF lp u d dp] by blast
+ from minusinf_repeats[OF d lp]
+ have th3: "\<forall> x k. ?M x = ?M (x-k*d)" by simp
+ from cpmi_eq[OF dp th th2 th3] BB' show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+ (* Reddy and Loveland *)
+
+
+consts
+ \<rho> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (num \<times> int) list" (* Compute the Reddy and Loveland Bset*)
+ \<sigma>\<rho>:: "fm \<Rightarrow> num \<times> int \<Rightarrow> fm" (* Performs the modified substitution of Reddy and Loveland*)
+ \<alpha>\<rho> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (num\<times>int) list"
+ a\<rho> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef \<rho> "measure size"
+ "\<rho> (And p q) = (\<rho> p @ \<rho> q)"
+ "\<rho> (Or p q) = (\<rho> p @ \<rho> q)"
+ "\<rho> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Sub (C -1) e,c)]"
+ "\<rho> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<rho> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<rho> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = []"
+ "\<rho> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e, c)]"
+ "\<rho> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = [(Sub (C (-1)) e, c)]"
+ "\<rho> p = []"
+
+recdef \<sigma>\<rho> "measure size"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (And p q) = (\<lambda> (t,k). And (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,k)) (\<sigma>\<rho> q (t,k)))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> (t,k). Or (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,k)) (\<sigma>\<rho> q (t,k)))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (Eq (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (Eq (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (NEq (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (NEq (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (Lt (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (Lt (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (Le (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (Le (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (Gt (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (Gt (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (Ge (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (Ge (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) =(\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (Dvd i (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (Dvd (i*k) (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))=(\<lambda> (t,k). if k dvd c then (NDvd i (Add (Mul (c div k) t) e))
+ else (NDvd (i*k) (Add (Mul c t) (Mul k e))))"
+ "\<sigma>\<rho> p = (\<lambda> (t,k). p)"
+
+recdef \<alpha>\<rho> "measure size"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> (And p q) = (\<alpha>\<rho> p @ \<alpha>\<rho> q)"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> (Or p q) = (\<alpha>\<rho> p @ \<alpha>\<rho> q)"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Add (C -1) e,c)]"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [(e,c)]"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = [(e,c)]"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = [(Add (C -1) e,c)]"
+ "\<alpha>\<rho> p = []"
+
+ (* Simulates normal substituion by modifying the formula see correctness theorem *)
+
+recdef a\<rho> "measure size"
+ "a\<rho> (And p q) = (\<lambda> k. And (a\<rho> p k) (a\<rho> q k))"
+ "a\<rho> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> k. Or (a\<rho> p k) (a\<rho> q k))"
+ "a\<rho> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (Eq (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (Eq (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (NEq (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (NEq (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (Lt (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (Lt (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (Le (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (Le (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (Gt (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (Gt (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (Ge (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (Ge (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (Dvd i (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (Dvd (i*k) (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> k. if k dvd c then (NDvd i (CN 0 (c div k) e))
+ else (NDvd (i*k) (CN 0 c (Mul k e))))"
+ "a\<rho> p = (\<lambda> k. p)"
+
+constdefs \<sigma> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "\<sigma> p k t \<equiv> And (Dvd k t) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,k))"
+
+lemma \<sigma>\<rho>:
+ assumes linp: "iszlfm p (real (x::int)#bs)"
+ and kpos: "real k > 0"
+ and tnb: "numbound0 t"
+ and tint: "isint t (real x#bs)"
+ and kdt: "k dvd floor (Inum (b'#bs) t)"
+ shows "Ifm (real x#bs) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,k)) =
+ (Ifm ((real ((floor (Inum (b'#bs) t)) div k))#bs) p)"
+ (is "?I (real x) (?s p) = (?I (real ((floor (?N b' t)) div k)) p)" is "_ = (?I ?tk p)")
+using linp kpos tnb
+proof(induct p rule: \<sigma>\<rho>.induct)
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (Eq (CN 0 c e))) = ((real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k = 0)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (Eq (CN 0 c e)))" using nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF knz', where a="real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e" and b="0", symmetric] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (NEq (CN 0 c e))) = ((real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k \<noteq> 0)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (NEq (CN 0 c e)))" using nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF knz', where a="real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e" and b="0", symmetric] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (Lt (CN 0 c e))) = ((real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k < 0)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (Lt (CN 0 c e)))" using pos_less_divide_eq[OF kpos, where a="real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e" and b="0", symmetric] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (Le (CN 0 c e))) = ((real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k \<le> 0)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (Le (CN 0 c e)))" using pos_le_divide_eq[OF kpos, where a="real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e" and b="0", symmetric] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (Gt (CN 0 c e))) = ((real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k > 0)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (Gt (CN 0 c e)))" using pos_divide_less_eq[OF kpos, where a="real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e" and b="0", symmetric] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (Ge (CN 0 c e))) = ((real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k \<ge> 0)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (Ge (CN 0 c e)))" using pos_divide_le_eq[OF kpos, where a="real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e" and b="0", symmetric] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 i c e) from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (Dvd i (CN 0 c e))) = (real i * real k rdvd (real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k)"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)))" using rdvd_mult[OF knz, where n="i"] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (10 i c e) from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti) }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ from kpos have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from tint have ti: "real (floor (?N (real x) t)) = ?N (real x) t" using isint_def by simp
+ from prems have "?I (real x) (?s (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))) = (\<not> (real i * real k rdvd (real c * (?N (real x) t / real k) + ?N (real x) e)* real k))"
+ using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt]
+ numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"] by (simp add: ti algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I ?tk (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)))" using rdvd_mult[OF knz, where n="i"] real_of_int_div[OF knz kdt] numbound0_I[OF tnb, where bs="bs" and b="b'" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?tk" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: ti)
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed (simp_all add: nth_pos2 bound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real ((floor (?N b' t)) div k)" and b'="real x"] numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real ((floor (?N b' t)) div k)" and b'="real x"])
+
+
+lemma a\<rho>:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (x::int)#bs)" and kp: "real k > 0"
+ shows "Ifm (real (x*k)#bs) (a\<rho> p k) = Ifm (real x#bs) p" (is "?I (x*k) (?f p k) = ?I x p")
+using lp bound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"]
+proof(induct p rule: a\<rho>.induct)
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume nkdc: "\<not> k dvd c" hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF knz', where b="0" and a="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e", symmetric] by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume nkdc: "\<not> k dvd c" hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF knz', where b="0" and a="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e", symmetric] by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume nkdc: "\<not> k dvd c" hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] pos_less_divide_eq[OF kp, where b="0" and a="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e", symmetric] by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume nkdc: "\<not> k dvd c" hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] pos_le_divide_eq[OF kp, where b="0" and a="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e", symmetric] by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume nkdc: "\<not> k dvd c" hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] pos_divide_less_eq[OF kp, where b="0" and a="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e", symmetric] by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume nkdc: "\<not> k dvd c" hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"] pos_divide_le_eq[OF kp, where b="0" and a="real c * real x + Inum (real x # bs) e", symmetric] by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 i c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ hence "Ifm (real (x*k)#bs) (a\<rho> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) k) =
+ (real i * real k rdvd (real c * real x + Inum (real x#bs) e) * real k)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm (real x#bs) (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)))" by (simp add: rdvd_mult[OF knz, where n="i"])
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (10 i c e)
+ from prems have cp: "c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by auto
+ from kp have knz: "k\<noteq>0" by simp hence knz': "real k \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ {assume kdc: "k dvd c" from prems have ?case using real_of_int_div[OF knz kdc] by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> k dvd c"
+ hence "Ifm (real (x*k)#bs) (a\<rho> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) k) =
+ (\<not> (real i * real k rdvd (real c * real x + Inum (real x#bs) e) * real k))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real (x*k)" and b'="real x"]
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm (real x#bs) (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)))" by (simp add: rdvd_mult[OF knz, where n="i"])
+ finally have ?case . }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed (simp_all add: nth_pos2)
+
+lemma a\<rho>_ex:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (x::int)#bs)" and kp: "k > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). real k rdvd real x \<and> Ifm (real x#bs) (a\<rho> p k)) =
+ (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p)" (is "(\<exists> x. ?D x \<and> ?P' x) = (\<exists> x. ?P x)")
+proof-
+ have "(\<exists> x. ?D x \<and> ?P' x) = (\<exists> x. k dvd x \<and> ?P' x)" using int_rdvd_iff by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists>x. ?P' (x*k))" using unity_coeff_ex[where P="?P'" and l="k", simplified]
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> x. ?P x)" using a\<rho> iszlfm_gen[OF lp] kp by auto
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+lemma \<sigma>\<rho>': assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (x::int)#bs)" and kp: "k > 0" and nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "Ifm (real x#bs) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,k)) = Ifm ((Inum (real x#bs) t)#bs) (a\<rho> p k)"
+using lp
+by(induct p rule: \<sigma>\<rho>.induct, simp_all add:
+ numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="Inum (real x#bs) t" and b'="real x"]
+ numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="Inum (real x#bs) t" and b'="real x"]
+ bound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="Inum (real x#bs) t" and b'="real x"] nth_pos2 cong: imp_cong)
+
+lemma \<sigma>\<rho>_nb: assumes lp:"iszlfm p (a#bs)" and nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "bound0 (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,k))"
+ using lp
+ by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct, auto simp add: nb)
+
+lemma \<rho>_l:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ shows "\<forall> (b,k) \<in> set (\<rho> p). k >0 \<and> numbound0 b \<and> isint b (real i#bs)"
+using lp by (induct p rule: \<rho>.induct, auto simp add: isint_sub isint_neg)
+
+lemma \<alpha>\<rho>_l:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ shows "\<forall> (b,k) \<in> set (\<alpha>\<rho> p). k >0 \<and> numbound0 b \<and> isint b (real i#bs)"
+using lp isint_add [OF isint_c[where j="- 1"],where bs="real i#bs"]
+ by (induct p rule: \<alpha>\<rho>.induct, auto)
+
+lemma zminusinf_\<rho>:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (real i#bs) (minusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (real i#bs) (?M p))")
+ and ex: "Ifm (real i#bs) p" (is "?I i p")
+ shows "\<exists> (e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p). real (c*i) > Inum (real i#bs) e" (is "\<exists> (e,c) \<in> ?R p. real (c*i) > ?N i e")
+ using lp nmi ex
+by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto)
+
+
+lemma \<sigma>_And: "Ifm bs (\<sigma> (And p q) k t) = Ifm bs (And (\<sigma> p k t) (\<sigma> q k t))"
+using \<sigma>_def by auto
+lemma \<sigma>_Or: "Ifm bs (\<sigma> (Or p q) k t) = Ifm bs (Or (\<sigma> p k t) (\<sigma> q k t))"
+using \<sigma>_def by auto
+
+lemma \<rho>: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int) #bs)"
+ and pi: "Ifm (real i#bs) p"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ and nob: "\<forall>(e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p). \<forall> j\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) \<noteq> Inum (real i#bs) e + real j"
+ (is "\<forall>(e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p). \<forall> j\<in> {1 .. c*d}. _ \<noteq> ?N i e + _")
+ shows "Ifm (real(i - d)#bs) p"
+ using lp pi d nob
+proof(induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
+ case (3 c e) hence cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" and ei: "isint e (real i#bs)"
+ and pi: "real (c*i) = - 1 - ?N i e + real (1::int)" and nob: "\<forall> j\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) \<noteq> -1 - ?N i e + real j"
+ by simp+
+ from mult_strict_left_mono[OF dp cp] have one:"1 \<in> {1 .. c*d}" by auto
+ from nob[rule_format, where j="1", OF one] pi show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ hence cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" and ei: "isint e (real i#bs)"
+ and nob: "\<forall> j\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) \<noteq> - ?N i e + real j"
+ by simp+
+ {assume "real (c*i) \<noteq> - ?N i e + real (c*d)"
+ with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="real i - real d" and b'="real i"]
+ have ?case by (simp add: algebra_simps)}
+ moreover
+ {assume pi: "real (c*i) = - ?N i e + real (c*d)"
+ from mult_strict_left_mono[OF dp cp] have d: "(c*d) \<in> {1 .. c*d}" by simp
+ from nob[rule_format, where j="c*d", OF d] pi have ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e) hence cp: "c > 0" by simp
+ from prems mult_strict_left_mono[OF dp cp, simplified real_of_int_less_iff[symmetric]
+ real_of_int_mult]
+ show ?case using prems dp
+ by (simp add: add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real i - real d" and b'="real i"]
+ algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence cp: "c > 0" by simp
+ from prems mult_strict_left_mono[OF dp cp, simplified real_of_int_less_iff[symmetric]
+ real_of_int_mult]
+ show ?case using prems dp
+ by (simp add: add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real i - real d" and b'="real i"]
+ algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" and ei: "isint e (real i#bs)"
+ and nob: "\<forall> j\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) \<noteq> - ?N i e + real j"
+ and pi: "real (c*i) + ?N i e > 0" and cp': "real c >0"
+ by simp+
+ let ?fe = "floor (?N i e)"
+ from pi cp have th:"(real i +?N i e / real c)*real c > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ from pi ei[simplified isint_iff] have "real (c*i + ?fe) > real (0::int)" by simp
+ hence pi': "c*i + ?fe > 0" by (simp only: real_of_int_less_iff[symmetric])
+ have "real (c*i) + ?N i e > real (c*d) \<or> real (c*i) + ?N i e \<le> real (c*d)" by auto
+ moreover
+ {assume "real (c*i) + ?N i e > real (c*d)" hence ?case
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps
+ numbound0_I[OF nb,where bs="bs" and b="real i - real d" and b'="real i"])}
+ moreover
+ {assume H:"real (c*i) + ?N i e \<le> real (c*d)"
+ with ei[simplified isint_iff] have "real (c*i + ?fe) \<le> real (c*d)" by simp
+ hence pid: "c*i + ?fe \<le> c*d" by (simp only: real_of_int_le_iff)
+ with pi' have "\<exists> j1\<in> {1 .. c*d}. c*i + ?fe = j1" by auto
+ hence "\<exists> j1\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) = - ?N i e + real j1"
+ by (simp only: diff_def[symmetric] real_of_int_mult real_of_int_add real_of_int_inject[symmetric] ei[simplified isint_iff] algebra_simps)
+ with nob have ?case by blast }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" and ei: "isint e (real i#bs)"
+ and nob: "\<forall> j\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) \<noteq> - 1 - ?N i e + real j"
+ and pi: "real (c*i) + ?N i e \<ge> 0" and cp': "real c >0"
+ by simp+
+ let ?fe = "floor (?N i e)"
+ from pi cp have th:"(real i +?N i e / real c)*real c \<ge> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ from pi ei[simplified isint_iff] have "real (c*i + ?fe) \<ge> real (0::int)" by simp
+ hence pi': "c*i + 1 + ?fe \<ge> 1" by (simp only: real_of_int_le_iff[symmetric])
+ have "real (c*i) + ?N i e \<ge> real (c*d) \<or> real (c*i) + ?N i e < real (c*d)" by auto
+ moreover
+ {assume "real (c*i) + ?N i e \<ge> real (c*d)" hence ?case
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps
+ numbound0_I[OF nb,where bs="bs" and b="real i - real d" and b'="real i"])}
+ moreover
+ {assume H:"real (c*i) + ?N i e < real (c*d)"
+ with ei[simplified isint_iff] have "real (c*i + ?fe) < real (c*d)" by simp
+ hence pid: "c*i + 1 + ?fe \<le> c*d" by (simp only: real_of_int_le_iff)
+ with pi' have "\<exists> j1\<in> {1 .. c*d}. c*i + 1+ ?fe = j1" by auto
+ hence "\<exists> j1\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) + 1= - ?N i e + real j1"
+ by (simp only: diff_def[symmetric] real_of_int_mult real_of_int_add real_of_int_inject[symmetric] ei[simplified isint_iff] algebra_simps real_of_one)
+ hence "\<exists> j1\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) = (- ?N i e + real j1) - 1"
+ by (simp only: algebra_simps diff_def[symmetric])
+ hence "\<exists> j1\<in> {1 .. c*d}. real (c*i) = - 1 - ?N i e + real j1"
+ by (simp only: add_ac diff_def)
+ with nob have ?case by blast }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (9 j c e) hence p: "real j rdvd real (c*i) + ?N i e" (is "?p x") and cp: "c > 0" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real i # bs) e"
+ from prems have "isint e (real i #bs)" by simp
+ hence ie: "real (floor ?e) = ?e" using isint_iff[where n="e" and bs="(real i)#bs"] numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real i" and b'="real i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ from prems have id: "j dvd d" by simp
+ from ie[symmetric] have "?p i = (real j rdvd real (c*i+ floor ?e))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd c*i + floor ?e)"
+ using int_rdvd_iff [where i="j" and t="c*i+ floor ?e"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (j dvd c*i - c*d + floor ?e)"
+ using dvd_period[OF id, where x="c*i" and c="-c" and t="floor ?e"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real j rdvd real (c*i - c*d + floor ?e))"
+ using int_rdvd_iff[where i="j" and t="(c*i - c*d + floor ?e)",symmetric, simplified]
+ ie by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (real j rdvd real (c*(i - d)) + ?e)"
+ using ie by (simp add:algebra_simps)
+ finally show ?case
+ using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real i - real d" and b'="real i" and bs="bs"] p
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (10 j c e) hence p: "\<not> (real j rdvd real (c*i) + ?N i e)" (is "?p x") and cp: "c > 0" and bn:"numbound0 e" by simp+
+ let ?e = "Inum (real i # bs) e"
+ from prems have "isint e (real i #bs)" by simp
+ hence ie: "real (floor ?e) = ?e" using isint_iff[where n="e" and bs="(real i)#bs"] numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real i" and b'="real i" and bs="bs"]
+ by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ from prems have id: "j dvd d" by simp
+ from ie[symmetric] have "?p i = (\<not> (real j rdvd real (c*i+ floor ?e)))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = Not (j dvd c*i + floor ?e)"
+ using int_rdvd_iff [where i="j" and t="c*i+ floor ?e"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = Not (j dvd c*i - c*d + floor ?e)"
+ using dvd_period[OF id, where x="c*i" and c="-c" and t="floor ?e"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = Not (real j rdvd real (c*i - c*d + floor ?e))"
+ using int_rdvd_iff[where i="j" and t="(c*i - c*d + floor ?e)",symmetric, simplified]
+ ie by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = Not (real j rdvd real (c*(i - d)) + ?e)"
+ using ie by (simp add:algebra_simps)
+ finally show ?case
+ using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="real i - real d" and b'="real i" and bs="bs"] p
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+qed(auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="real i - real d" and b'="real i"] nth_pos2)
+
+lemma \<sigma>_nb: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)" and nb: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "bound0 (\<sigma> p k t)"
+ using \<sigma>\<rho>_nb[OF lp nb] nb by (simp add: \<sigma>_def)
+
+lemma \<rho>': assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a #bs)"
+ and d: "d\<delta> p d"
+ and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "\<forall> x. \<not>(\<exists> (e,c) \<in> set(\<rho> p). \<exists>(j::int) \<in> {1 .. c*d}. Ifm (a #bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))) \<longrightarrow> Ifm (real x#bs) p \<longrightarrow> Ifm (real (x - d)#bs) p" (is "\<forall> x. ?b x \<longrightarrow> ?P x \<longrightarrow> ?P (x - d)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix x
+ assume nob1:"?b x" and px: "?P x"
+ from iszlfm_gen[OF lp, rule_format, where y="real x"] have lp': "iszlfm p (real x#bs)".
+ have nob: "\<forall>(e, c)\<in>set (\<rho> p). \<forall>j\<in>{1..c * d}. real (c * x) \<noteq> Inum (real x # bs) e + real j"
+ proof(clarify)
+ fix e c j assume ecR: "(e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p)" and jD: "j\<in> {1 .. c*d}"
+ and cx: "real (c*x) = Inum (real x#bs) e + real j"
+ let ?e = "Inum (real x#bs) e"
+ let ?fe = "floor ?e"
+ from \<rho>_l[OF lp'] ecR have ei:"isint e (real x#bs)" and cp:"c>0" and nb:"numbound0 e"
+ by auto
+ from numbound0_gen [OF nb ei, rule_format,where y="a"] have "isint e (a#bs)" .
+ from cx ei[simplified isint_iff] have "real (c*x) = real (?fe + j)" by simp
+ hence cx: "c*x = ?fe + j" by (simp only: real_of_int_inject)
+ hence cdej:"c dvd ?fe + j" by (simp add: dvd_def) (rule_tac x="x" in exI, simp)
+ hence "real c rdvd real (?fe + j)" by (simp only: int_rdvd_iff)
+ hence rcdej: "real c rdvd ?e + real j" by (simp add: ei[simplified isint_iff])
+ from cx have "(c*x) div c = (?fe + j) div c" by simp
+ with cp have "x = (?fe + j) div c" by simp
+ with px have th: "?P ((?fe + j) div c)" by auto
+ from cp have cp': "real c > 0" by simp
+ from cdej have cdej': "c dvd floor (Inum (real x#bs) (Add e (C j)))" by simp
+ from nb have nb': "numbound0 (Add e (C j))" by simp
+ have ji: "isint (C j) (real x#bs)" by (simp add: isint_def)
+ from isint_add[OF ei ji] have ei':"isint (Add e (C j)) (real x#bs)" .
+ from th \<sigma>\<rho>[where b'="real x", OF lp' cp' nb' ei' cdej',symmetric]
+ have "Ifm (real x#bs) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (Add e (C j), c))" by simp
+ with rcdej have th: "Ifm (real x#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))" by (simp add: \<sigma>_def)
+ from th bound0_I[OF \<sigma>_nb[OF lp nb', where k="c"],where bs="bs" and b="real x" and b'="a"]
+ have "Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))" by blast
+ with ecR jD nob1 show "False" by blast
+ qed
+ from \<rho>[OF lp' px d dp nob] show "?P (x -d )" .
+qed
+
+
+lemma rl_thm:
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1 .. \<delta> p}. Ifm (real j#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> (e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p). \<exists> j\<in> {1 .. c*(\<delta> p)}. Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))))"
+ (is "(\<exists>(x::int). ?P x) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1.. \<delta> p}. ?MP j)\<or>(\<exists> (e,c) \<in> ?R. \<exists> j\<in> _. ?SP c e j))"
+ is "?lhs = (?MD \<or> ?RD)" is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof-
+ let ?d= "\<delta> p"
+ from \<delta>[OF lp] have d:"d\<delta> p ?d" and dp: "?d > 0" by auto
+ { assume H:"?MD" hence th:"\<exists> (x::int). ?MP x" by blast
+ from H minusinf_ex[OF lp th] have ?thesis by blast}
+ moreover
+ { fix e c j assume exR:"(e,c) \<in> ?R" and jD:"j\<in> {1 .. c*?d}" and spx:"?SP c e j"
+ from exR \<rho>_l[OF lp] have nb: "numbound0 e" and ei:"isint e (real i#bs)" and cp: "c > 0"
+ by auto
+ have "isint (C j) (real i#bs)" by (simp add: isint_iff)
+ with isint_add[OF numbound0_gen[OF nb ei,rule_format, where y="real i"]]
+ have eji:"isint (Add e (C j)) (real i#bs)" by simp
+ from nb have nb': "numbound0 (Add e (C j))" by simp
+ from spx bound0_I[OF \<sigma>_nb[OF lp nb', where k="c"], where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="real i"]
+ have spx': "Ifm (real i # bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))" by blast
+ from spx' have rcdej:"real c rdvd (Inum (real i#bs) (Add e (C j)))"
+ and sr:"Ifm (real i#bs) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (Add e (C j),c))" by (simp add: \<sigma>_def)+
+ from rcdej eji[simplified isint_iff]
+ have "real c rdvd real (floor (Inum (real i#bs) (Add e (C j))))" by simp
+ hence cdej:"c dvd floor (Inum (real i#bs) (Add e (C j)))" by (simp only: int_rdvd_iff)
+ from cp have cp': "real c > 0" by simp
+ from \<sigma>\<rho>[OF lp cp' nb' eji cdej] spx' have "?P (\<lfloor>Inum (real i # bs) (Add e (C j))\<rfloor> div c)"
+ by (simp add: \<sigma>_def)
+ hence ?lhs by blast
+ with exR jD spx have ?thesis by blast}
+ moreover
+ { fix x assume px: "?P x" and nob: "\<not> ?RD"
+ from iszlfm_gen [OF lp,rule_format, where y="a"] have lp':"iszlfm p (a#bs)" .
+ from \<rho>'[OF lp' d dp, rule_format, OF nob] have th:"\<forall> x. ?P x \<longrightarrow> ?P (x - ?d)" by blast
+ from minusinf_inf[OF lp] obtain z where z:"\<forall> x<z. ?MP x = ?P x" by blast
+ have zp: "abs (x - z) + 1 \<ge> 0" by arith
+ from decr_lemma[OF dp,where x="x" and z="z"]
+ decr_mult_lemma[OF dp th zp, rule_format, OF px] z have th:"\<exists> x. ?MP x" by auto
+ with minusinf_bex[OF lp] px nob have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma mirror_\<alpha>\<rho>: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)"
+ shows "(\<lambda> (t,k). (Inum (a#bs) t, k)) ` set (\<alpha>\<rho> p) = (\<lambda> (t,k). (Inum (a#bs) t,k)) ` set (\<rho> (mirror p))"
+using lp
+by (induct p rule: mirror.induct, simp_all add: split_def image_Un )
+
+text {* The @{text "\<real>"} part*}
+
+text{* Linearity for fm where Bound 0 ranges over @{text "\<real>"}*}
+consts
+ isrlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" (* Linearity test for fm *)
+recdef isrlfm "measure size"
+ "isrlfm (And p q) = (isrlfm p \<and> isrlfm q)"
+ "isrlfm (Or p q) = (isrlfm p \<and> isrlfm q)"
+ "isrlfm (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (c>0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ "isrlfm p = (isatom p \<and> (bound0 p))"
+
+constdefs fp :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "fp p n s j \<equiv> (if n > 0 then
+ (And p (And (Ge (CN 0 n (Sub s (Add (Floor s) (C j)))))
+ (Lt (CN 0 n (Sub s (Add (Floor s) (C (j+1))))))))
+ else
+ (And p (And (Le (CN 0 (-n) (Add (Neg s) (Add (Floor s) (C j)))))
+ (Gt (CN 0 (-n) (Add (Neg s) (Add (Floor s) (C (j + 1)))))))))"
+
+ (* splits the bounded from the unbounded part*)
+consts rsplit0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> (fm \<times> int \<times> num) list"
+recdef rsplit0 "measure num_size"
+ "rsplit0 (Bound 0) = [(T,1,C 0)]"
+ "rsplit0 (Add a b) = (let acs = rsplit0 a ; bcs = rsplit0 b
+ in map (\<lambda> ((p,n,t),(q,m,s)). (And p q, n+m, Add t s)) [(a,b). a\<leftarrow>acs,b\<leftarrow>bcs])"
+ "rsplit0 (Sub a b) = rsplit0 (Add a (Neg b))"
+ "rsplit0 (Neg a) = map (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (p,-n,Neg s)) (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rsplit0 (Floor a) = foldl (op @) [] (map
+ (\<lambda> (p,n,s). if n=0 then [(p,0,Floor s)]
+ else (map (\<lambda> j. (fp p n s j, 0, Add (Floor s) (C j))) (if n > 0 then iupt (0,n) else iupt(n,0))))
+ (rsplit0 a))"
+ "rsplit0 (CN 0 c a) = map (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (p,n+c,s)) (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rsplit0 (CN m c a) = map (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (p,n,CN m c s)) (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rsplit0 (CF c t s) = rsplit0 (Add (Mul c (Floor t)) s)"
+ "rsplit0 (Mul c a) = map (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (p,c*n,Mul c s)) (rsplit0 a)"
+ "rsplit0 t = [(T,0,t)]"
+
+lemma not_rl[simp]: "isrlfm p \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm (not p)"
+ by (induct p rule: isrlfm.induct, auto)
+lemma conj_rl[simp]: "isrlfm p \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm q \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm (conj p q)"
+ using conj_def by (cases p, auto)
+lemma disj_rl[simp]: "isrlfm p \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm q \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm (disj p q)"
+ using disj_def by (cases p, auto)
+
+
+lemma rsplit0_cs:
+ shows "\<forall> (p,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 t).
+ (Ifm (x#bs) p \<longrightarrow> (Inum (x#bs) t = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s))) \<and> numbound0 s \<and> isrlfm p"
+ (is "\<forall> (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS t. (?I p \<longrightarrow> ?N t = ?N (CN 0 n s)) \<and> _ \<and> _ ")
+proof(induct t rule: rsplit0.induct)
+ case (5 a)
+ let ?p = "\<lambda> (p,n,s) j. fp p n s j"
+ let ?f = "(\<lambda> (p,n,s) j. (?p (p,n,s) j, (0::int),Add (Floor s) (C j)))"
+ let ?J = "\<lambda> n. if n>0 then iupt (0,n) else iupt (n,0)"
+ let ?ff=" (\<lambda> (p,n,s). if n= 0 then [(p,0,Floor s)] else map (?f (p,n,s)) (?J n))"
+ have int_cases: "\<forall> (i::int). i= 0 \<or> i < 0 \<or> i > 0" by arith
+ have U1: "(UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) =
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set [(p,0,Floor s)]))" by auto
+ have U2': "\<forall> (p,n,s) \<in> {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0}.
+ ?ff (p,n,s) = map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(0,n))" by auto
+ hence U2: "(UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) =
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s).
+ set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(0,n)))))"
+ proof-
+ fix M :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) set" and f :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) \<Rightarrow> 'd list" and g
+ assume "\<forall> (a,b,c) \<in> M. f (a,b,c) = g a b c"
+ thus "(UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (f (a,b,c)))) = (UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (g a b c)))"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def)
+ qed
+ have U3': "\<forall> (p,n,s) \<in> {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0}. ?ff (p,n,s) = map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(n,0))"
+ by auto
+ hence U3: "(UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) =
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s)\<in> ?SS a\<and>n<0} (\<lambda>(p,n,s). set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(n,0)))))"
+ proof-
+ fix M :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) set" and f :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) \<Rightarrow> 'd list" and g
+ assume "\<forall> (a,b,c) \<in> M. f (a,b,c) = g a b c"
+ thus "(UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (f (a,b,c)))) = (UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (g a b c)))"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def)
+ qed
+ have "?SS (Floor a) = UNION (?SS a) (\<lambda>x. set (?ff x))"
+ by (auto simp add: foldl_conv_concat)
+ also have "\<dots> = UNION (?SS a) (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))))"
+ using int_cases[rule_format] by blast
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set [(p,0,Floor s)])) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s)\<in> ?SS a\<and>n>0} (\<lambda>(p,n,s). set(map(?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(0,n))))) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s).
+ set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(n,0))))))" by (simp only: U1 U2 U3)
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {(p,0,Floor s)})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (?f(p,n,s)) ` {0 .. n})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (?f(p,n,s)) ` {n .. 0})))"
+ by (simp only: set_map iupt_set set.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {(p,0,Floor s)})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {0 .. n}})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {n .. 0}})))" by blast
+ finally
+ have FS: "?SS (Floor a) =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {(p,0,Floor s)})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {0 .. n}})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {n .. 0}})))" by blast
+ show ?case
+ proof(simp only: FS, clarsimp simp del: Ifm.simps Inum.simps, -)
+ fix p n s
+ let ?ths = "(?I p \<longrightarrow> (?N (Floor a) = ?N (CN 0 n s))) \<and> numbound0 s \<and> isrlfm p"
+ assume "(\<exists>ba. (p, 0, ba) \<in> set (rsplit0 a) \<and> n = 0 \<and> s = Floor ba) \<or>
+ (\<exists>ab ac ba.
+ (ab, ac, ba) \<in> set (rsplit0 a) \<and>
+ 0 < ac \<and>
+ (\<exists>j. p = fp ab ac ba j \<and>
+ n = 0 \<and> s = Add (Floor ba) (C j) \<and> 0 \<le> j \<and> j \<le> ac)) \<or>
+ (\<exists>ab ac ba.
+ (ab, ac, ba) \<in> set (rsplit0 a) \<and>
+ ac < 0 \<and>
+ (\<exists>j. p = fp ab ac ba j \<and>
+ n = 0 \<and> s = Add (Floor ba) (C j) \<and> ac \<le> j \<and> j \<le> 0))"
+ moreover
+ {fix s'
+ assume "(p, 0, s') \<in> ?SS a" and "n = 0" and "s = Floor s'"
+ hence ?ths using prems by auto}
+ moreover
+ { fix p' n' s' j
+ assume pns: "(p', n', s') \<in> ?SS a"
+ and np: "0 < n'"
+ and p_def: "p = ?p (p',n',s') j"
+ and n0: "n = 0"
+ and s_def: "s = (Add (Floor s') (C j))"
+ and jp: "0 \<le> j" and jn: "j \<le> n'"
+ from prems pns have H:"(Ifm ((x\<Colon>real) # (bs\<Colon>real list)) p' \<longrightarrow>
+ Inum (x # bs) a = Inum (x # bs) (CN 0 n' s')) \<and>
+ numbound0 s' \<and> isrlfm p'" by blast
+ hence nb: "numbound0 s'" by simp
+ from H have nf: "isrlfm (?p (p',n',s') j)" using fp_def np by (simp add: numsub_nb)
+ let ?nxs = "CN 0 n' s'"
+ let ?l = "floor (?N s') + j"
+ from H
+ have "?I (?p (p',n',s') j) \<longrightarrow>
+ (((?N ?nxs \<ge> real ?l) \<and> (?N ?nxs < real (?l + 1))) \<and> (?N a = ?N ?nxs ))"
+ by (simp add: fp_def np algebra_simps numsub numadd numfloor)
+ also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> ((floor (?N ?nxs) = ?l) \<and> (?N a = ?N ?nxs ))"
+ using floor_int_eq[where x="?N ?nxs" and n="?l"] by simp
+ moreover
+ have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> (?N (Floor a) = ?N ((Add (Floor s') (C j))))" by simp
+ ultimately have "?I (?p (p',n',s') j) \<longrightarrow> (?N (Floor a) = ?N ((Add (Floor s') (C j))))"
+ by blast
+ with s_def n0 p_def nb nf have ?ths by auto}
+ moreover
+ {fix p' n' s' j
+ assume pns: "(p', n', s') \<in> ?SS a"
+ and np: "n' < 0"
+ and p_def: "p = ?p (p',n',s') j"
+ and n0: "n = 0"
+ and s_def: "s = (Add (Floor s') (C j))"
+ and jp: "n' \<le> j" and jn: "j \<le> 0"
+ from prems pns have H:"(Ifm ((x\<Colon>real) # (bs\<Colon>real list)) p' \<longrightarrow>
+ Inum (x # bs) a = Inum (x # bs) (CN 0 n' s')) \<and>
+ numbound0 s' \<and> isrlfm p'" by blast
+ hence nb: "numbound0 s'" by simp
+ from H have nf: "isrlfm (?p (p',n',s') j)" using fp_def np by (simp add: numneg_nb)
+ let ?nxs = "CN 0 n' s'"
+ let ?l = "floor (?N s') + j"
+ from H
+ have "?I (?p (p',n',s') j) \<longrightarrow>
+ (((?N ?nxs \<ge> real ?l) \<and> (?N ?nxs < real (?l + 1))) \<and> (?N a = ?N ?nxs ))"
+ by (simp add: np fp_def algebra_simps numneg numfloor numadd numsub)
+ also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> ((floor (?N ?nxs) = ?l) \<and> (?N a = ?N ?nxs ))"
+ using floor_int_eq[where x="?N ?nxs" and n="?l"] by simp
+ moreover
+ have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> (?N (Floor a) = ?N ((Add (Floor s') (C j))))" by simp
+ ultimately have "?I (?p (p',n',s') j) \<longrightarrow> (?N (Floor a) = ?N ((Add (Floor s') (C j))))"
+ by blast
+ with s_def n0 p_def nb nf have ?ths by auto}
+ ultimately show ?ths by auto
+ qed
+next
+ case (3 a b) then show ?case
+ apply auto
+ apply (erule_tac x = "(aa, aaa, ba)" in ballE) apply simp_all
+ apply (erule_tac x = "(ab, ac, baa)" in ballE) apply simp_all
+ done
+qed (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps conj_rl)
+
+lemma real_in_int_intervals:
+ assumes xb: "real m \<le> x \<and> x < real ((n::int) + 1)"
+ shows "\<exists> j\<in> {m.. n}. real j \<le> x \<and> x < real (j+1)" (is "\<exists> j\<in> ?N. ?P j")
+by (rule bexI[where P="?P" and x="floor x" and A="?N"])
+(auto simp add: floor_less_eq[where x="x" and a="n+1", simplified] xb[simplified] floor_mono2[where x="real m" and y="x", OF conjunct1[OF xb], simplified floor_real_of_int[where n="m"]])
+
+lemma rsplit0_complete:
+ assumes xp:"0 \<le> x" and x1:"x < 1"
+ shows "\<exists> (p,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 t). Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS t. ?I p")
+proof(induct t rule: rsplit0.induct)
+ case (2 a b)
+ from prems have "\<exists> (pa,na,sa) \<in> ?SS a. ?I pa" by auto
+ then obtain "pa" "na" "sa" where pa: "(pa,na,sa)\<in> ?SS a \<and> ?I pa" by blast
+ from prems have "\<exists> (pb,nb,sb) \<in> ?SS b. ?I pb" by auto
+ then obtain "pb" "nb" "sb" where pb: "(pb,nb,sb)\<in> ?SS b \<and> ?I pb" by blast
+ from pa pb have th: "((pa,na,sa),(pb,nb,sb)) \<in> set[(x,y). x\<leftarrow>rsplit0 a, y\<leftarrow>rsplit0 b]"
+ by (auto)
+ let ?f="(\<lambda> ((p,n,t),(q,m,s)). (And p q, n+m, Add t s))"
+ from imageI[OF th, where f="?f"] have "?f ((pa,na,sa),(pb,nb,sb)) \<in> ?SS (Add a b)"
+ by (simp add: Let_def)
+ hence "(And pa pb, na +nb, Add sa sb) \<in> ?SS (Add a b)" by simp
+ moreover from pa pb have "?I (And pa pb)" by simp
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 a)
+ let ?p = "\<lambda> (p,n,s) j. fp p n s j"
+ let ?f = "(\<lambda> (p,n,s) j. (?p (p,n,s) j, (0::int),(Add (Floor s) (C j))))"
+ let ?J = "\<lambda> n. if n>0 then iupt (0,n) else iupt (n,0)"
+ let ?ff=" (\<lambda> (p,n,s). if n= 0 then [(p,0,Floor s)] else map (?f (p,n,s)) (?J n))"
+ have int_cases: "\<forall> (i::int). i= 0 \<or> i < 0 \<or> i > 0" by arith
+ have U1: "(UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) = (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set [(p,0,Floor s)]))" by auto
+ have U2': "\<forall> (p,n,s) \<in> {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0}. ?ff (p,n,s) = map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(0,n))"
+ by auto
+ hence U2: "(UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) = (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(0,n)))))"
+ proof-
+ fix M :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) set" and f :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) \<Rightarrow> 'd list" and g
+ assume "\<forall> (a,b,c) \<in> M. f (a,b,c) = g a b c"
+ thus "(UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (f (a,b,c)))) = (UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (g a b c)))"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def)
+ qed
+ have U3': "\<forall> (p,n,s) \<in> {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0}. ?ff (p,n,s) = map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(n,0))"
+ by auto
+ hence U3: "(UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) = (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(n,0)))))"
+ proof-
+ fix M :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) set" and f :: "('a\<times>'b\<times>'c) \<Rightarrow> 'd list" and g
+ assume "\<forall> (a,b,c) \<in> M. f (a,b,c) = g a b c"
+ thus "(UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (f (a,b,c)))) = (UNION M (\<lambda> (a,b,c). set (g a b c)))"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def)
+ qed
+
+ have "?SS (Floor a) = UNION (?SS a) (\<lambda>x. set (?ff x))" by (auto simp add: foldl_conv_concat)
+ also have "\<dots> = UNION (?SS a) (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (?ff (p,n,s)))))"
+ using int_cases[rule_format] by blast
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set [(p,0,Floor s)])) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(0,n))))) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). set (map (?f(p,n,s)) (iupt(n,0))))))" by (simp only: U1 U2 U3)
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {(p,0,Floor s)})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (?f(p,n,s)) ` {0 .. n})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). (?f(p,n,s)) ` {n .. 0})))"
+ by (simp only: set_map iupt_set set.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {(p,0,Floor s)})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {0 .. n}})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {n .. 0}})))" by blast
+ finally
+ have FS: "?SS (Floor a) =
+ ((UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n=0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {(p,0,Floor s)})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n>0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {0 .. n}})) Un
+ (UNION {(p,n,s). (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> n<0} (\<lambda> (p,n,s). {?f(p,n,s) j| j. j\<in> {n .. 0}})))" by blast
+ from prems have "\<exists> (p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a. ?I p" by auto
+ then obtain "p" "n" "s" where pns: "(p,n,s) \<in> ?SS a \<and> ?I p" by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ from rsplit0_cs[rule_format] pns have ans:"(?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)) \<and> numbound0 s \<and> isrlfm p"
+ by auto
+
+ have "n=0 \<or> n >0 \<or> n <0" by arith
+ moreover {assume "n=0" hence ?case using pns by (simp only: FS) auto }
+ moreover
+ {
+ assume np: "n > 0"
+ from real_of_int_floor_le[where r="?N s"] have "?N (Floor s) \<le> ?N s" by simp
+ also from mult_left_mono[OF xp] np have "?N s \<le> real n * x + ?N s" by simp
+ finally have "?N (Floor s) \<le> real n * x + ?N s" .
+ moreover
+ {from mult_strict_left_mono[OF x1] np
+ have "real n *x + ?N s < real n + ?N s" by simp
+ also from real_of_int_floor_add_one_gt[where r="?N s"]
+ have "\<dots> < real n + ?N (Floor s) + 1" by simp
+ finally have "real n *x + ?N s < ?N (Floor s) + real (n+1)" by simp}
+ ultimately have "?N (Floor s) \<le> real n *x + ?N s\<and> real n *x + ?N s < ?N (Floor s) + real (n+1)" by simp
+ hence th: "0 \<le> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) \<and> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) < real (n+1)" by simp
+ from real_in_int_intervals th have "\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. n}. real j \<le> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s)\<and> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) < real (j+1)" by simp
+
+ hence "\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. n}. 0 \<le> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) - real j \<and> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) - real (j+1) < 0"
+ by(simp only: myl[rule_format, where b="real n * x + Inum (x # bs) s - Inum (x # bs) (Floor s)"] less_iff_diff_less_0[where a="real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s)"])
+ hence "\<exists> j\<in> {0.. n}. ?I (?p (p,n,s) j)"
+ using pns by (simp add: fp_def np algebra_simps numsub numadd)
+ then obtain "j" where j_def: "j\<in> {0 .. n} \<and> ?I (?p (p,n,s) j)" by blast
+ hence "\<exists>x \<in> {?p (p,n,s) j |j. 0\<le> j \<and> j \<le> n }. ?I x" by auto
+ hence ?case using pns
+ by (simp only: FS,simp add: bex_Un)
+ (rule disjI2, rule disjI1,rule exI [where x="p"],
+ rule exI [where x="n"],rule exI [where x="s"],simp_all add: np)
+ }
+ moreover
+ { assume nn: "n < 0" hence np: "-n >0" by simp
+ from real_of_int_floor_le[where r="?N s"] have "?N (Floor s) + 1 > ?N s" by simp
+ moreover from mult_left_mono_neg[OF xp] nn have "?N s \<ge> real n * x + ?N s" by simp
+ ultimately have "?N (Floor s) + 1 > real n * x + ?N s" by arith
+ moreover
+ {from mult_strict_left_mono_neg[OF x1, where c="real n"] nn
+ have "real n *x + ?N s \<ge> real n + ?N s" by simp
+ moreover from real_of_int_floor_le[where r="?N s"] have "real n + ?N s \<ge> real n + ?N (Floor s)" by simp
+ ultimately have "real n *x + ?N s \<ge> ?N (Floor s) + real n"
+ by (simp only: algebra_simps)}
+ ultimately have "?N (Floor s) + real n \<le> real n *x + ?N s\<and> real n *x + ?N s < ?N (Floor s) + real (1::int)" by simp
+ hence th: "real n \<le> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) \<and> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) < real (1::int)" by simp
+ have th1: "\<forall> (a::real). (- a > 0) = (a < 0)" by auto
+ have th2: "\<forall> (a::real). (0 \<ge> - a) = (a \<ge> 0)" by auto
+ from real_in_int_intervals th have "\<exists> j\<in> {n .. 0}. real j \<le> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s)\<and> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) < real (j+1)" by simp
+
+ hence "\<exists> j\<in> {n .. 0}. 0 \<le> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) - real j \<and> real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) - real (j+1) < 0"
+ by(simp only: myl[rule_format, where b="real n * x + Inum (x # bs) s - Inum (x # bs) (Floor s)"] less_iff_diff_less_0[where a="real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s)"])
+ hence "\<exists> j\<in> {n .. 0}. 0 \<ge> - (real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) - real j) \<and> - (real n *x + ?N s - ?N (Floor s) - real (j+1)) > 0" by (simp only: th1[rule_format] th2[rule_format])
+ hence "\<exists> j\<in> {n.. 0}. ?I (?p (p,n,s) j)"
+ using pns by (simp add: fp_def nn diff_def add_ac mult_ac numfloor numadd numneg
+ del: diff_less_0_iff_less diff_le_0_iff_le)
+ then obtain "j" where j_def: "j\<in> {n .. 0} \<and> ?I (?p (p,n,s) j)" by blast
+ hence "\<exists>x \<in> {?p (p,n,s) j |j. n\<le> j \<and> j \<le> 0 }. ?I x" by auto
+ hence ?case using pns
+ by (simp only: FS,simp add: bex_Un)
+ (rule disjI2, rule disjI2,rule exI [where x="p"],
+ rule exI [where x="n"],rule exI [where x="s"],simp_all add: nn)
+ }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+qed (auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+
+ (* Linearize a formula where Bound 0 ranges over [0,1) *)
+
+constdefs rsplit :: "(int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "rsplit f a \<equiv> foldr disj (map (\<lambda> (\<phi>, n, s). conj \<phi> (f n s)) (rsplit0 a)) F"
+
+lemma foldr_disj_map: "Ifm bs (foldr disj (map f xs) F) = (\<exists> x \<in> set xs. Ifm bs (f x))"
+by(induct xs, simp_all)
+
+lemma foldr_conj_map: "Ifm bs (foldr conj (map f xs) T) = (\<forall> x \<in> set xs. Ifm bs (f x))"
+by(induct xs, simp_all)
+
+lemma foldr_disj_map_rlfm:
+ assumes lf: "\<forall> n s. numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> isrlfm (f n s)"
+ and \<phi>: "\<forall> (\<phi>,n,s) \<in> set xs. numbound0 s \<and> isrlfm \<phi>"
+ shows "isrlfm (foldr disj (map (\<lambda> (\<phi>, n, s). conj \<phi> (f n s)) xs) F)"
+using lf \<phi> by (induct xs, auto)
+
+lemma rsplit_ex: "Ifm bs (rsplit f a) = (\<exists> (\<phi>,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 a). Ifm bs (conj \<phi> (f n s)))"
+using foldr_disj_map[where xs="rsplit0 a"] rsplit_def by (simp add: split_def)
+
+lemma rsplit_l: assumes lf: "\<forall> n s. numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> isrlfm (f n s)"
+ shows "isrlfm (rsplit f a)"
+proof-
+ from rsplit0_cs[where t="a"] have th: "\<forall> (\<phi>,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 a). numbound0 s \<and> isrlfm \<phi>" by blast
+ from foldr_disj_map_rlfm[OF lf th] rsplit_def show ?thesis by simp
+qed
+
+lemma rsplit:
+ assumes xp: "x \<ge> 0" and x1: "x < 1"
+ and f: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> (Ifm (x#bs) (f n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (g a))"
+ shows "Ifm (x#bs) (rsplit f a) = Ifm (x#bs) (g a)"
+proof(auto)
+ let ?I = "\<lambda>x p. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> x t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ assume "?I x (rsplit f a)"
+ hence "\<exists> (\<phi>,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 a). ?I x (And \<phi> (f n s))" using rsplit_ex by simp
+ then obtain "\<phi>" "n" "s" where fnsS:"(\<phi>,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 a)" and "?I x (And \<phi> (f n s))" by blast
+ hence \<phi>: "?I x \<phi>" and fns: "?I x (f n s)" by auto
+ from rsplit0_cs[where t="a" and bs="bs" and x="x", rule_format, OF fnsS] \<phi>
+ have th: "(?N x a = ?N x (CN 0 n s)) \<and> numbound0 s" by auto
+ from f[rule_format, OF th] fns show "?I x (g a)" by simp
+next
+ let ?I = "\<lambda>x p. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> x t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ assume ga: "?I x (g a)"
+ from rsplit0_complete[OF xp x1, where bs="bs" and t="a"]
+ obtain "\<phi>" "n" "s" where fnsS:"(\<phi>,n,s) \<in> set (rsplit0 a)" and fx: "?I x \<phi>" by blast
+ from rsplit0_cs[where t="a" and x="x" and bs="bs"] fnsS fx
+ have ans: "?N x a = ?N x (CN 0 n s)" and nb: "numbound0 s" by auto
+ with ga f have "?I x (f n s)" by auto
+ with rsplit_ex fnsS fx show "?I x (rsplit f a)" by auto
+qed
+
+definition lt :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ lt_def: "lt c t = (if c = 0 then (Lt t) else if c > 0 then (Lt (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Gt (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition le :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ le_def: "le c t = (if c = 0 then (Le t) else if c > 0 then (Le (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Ge (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition gt :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ gt_def: "gt c t = (if c = 0 then (Gt t) else if c > 0 then (Gt (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Lt (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition ge :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ ge_def: "ge c t = (if c = 0 then (Ge t) else if c > 0 then (Ge (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Le (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition eq :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ eq_def: "eq c t = (if c = 0 then (Eq t) else if c > 0 then (Eq (CN 0 c t))
+ else (Eq (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+definition neq :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ neq_def: "neq c t = (if c = 0 then (NEq t) else if c > 0 then (NEq (CN 0 c t))
+ else (NEq (CN 0 (-c) (Neg t))))"
+
+lemma lt_mono: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (lt n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Lt a)"
+ (is "\<forall> a n s . ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _\<longrightarrow> ?I (lt n s) = ?I (Lt a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)"
+ show "?I (lt n s) = ?I (Lt a)" using H by (cases "n=0", (simp add: lt_def))
+ (cases "n > 0", simp_all add: lt_def algebra_simps myless[rule_format, where b="0"])
+qed
+
+lemma lt_l: "isrlfm (rsplit lt a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="lt" and a="a"], auto simp add: lt_def,
+ case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+
+lemma le_mono: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (le n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Le a)" (is "\<forall> a n s. ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (le n s) = ?I (Le a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)"
+ show "?I (le n s) = ?I (Le a)" using H by (cases "n=0", (simp add: le_def))
+ (cases "n > 0", simp_all add: le_def algebra_simps myl[rule_format, where b="0"])
+qed
+
+lemma le_l: "isrlfm (rsplit le a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="le" and a="a"], auto simp add: le_def)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac "nat",simp_all)
+
+lemma gt_mono: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (gt n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Gt a)" (is "\<forall> a n s. ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (gt n s) = ?I (Gt a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)"
+ show "?I (gt n s) = ?I (Gt a)" using H by (cases "n=0", (simp add: gt_def))
+ (cases "n > 0", simp_all add: gt_def algebra_simps myless[rule_format, where b="0"])
+qed
+lemma gt_l: "isrlfm (rsplit gt a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="gt" and a="a"], auto simp add: gt_def)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+
+lemma ge_mono: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (ge n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Ge a)" (is "\<forall> a n s . ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (ge n s) = ?I (Ge a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)"
+ show "?I (ge n s) = ?I (Ge a)" using H by (cases "n=0", (simp add: ge_def))
+ (cases "n > 0", simp_all add: ge_def algebra_simps myl[rule_format, where b="0"])
+qed
+lemma ge_l: "isrlfm (rsplit ge a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="ge" and a="a"], auto simp add: ge_def)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+
+lemma eq_mono: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (eq n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Eq a)" (is "\<forall> a n s. ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (eq n s) = ?I (Eq a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)"
+ show "?I (eq n s) = ?I (Eq a)" using H by (auto simp add: eq_def algebra_simps)
+qed
+lemma eq_l: "isrlfm (rsplit eq a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="eq" and a="a"], auto simp add: eq_def)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac"nat", simp_all)
+
+lemma neq_mono: "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (neq n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (NEq a)" (is "\<forall> a n s. ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (neq n s) = ?I (NEq a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s bs
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)"
+ show "?I (neq n s) = ?I (NEq a)" using H by (auto simp add: neq_def algebra_simps)
+qed
+
+lemma neq_l: "isrlfm (rsplit neq a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="neq" and a="a"], auto simp add: neq_def)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac"nat", simp_all)
+
+lemma small_le:
+ assumes u0:"0 \<le> u" and u1: "u < 1"
+ shows "(-u \<le> real (n::int)) = (0 \<le> n)"
+using u0 u1 by auto
+
+lemma small_lt:
+ assumes u0:"0 \<le> u" and u1: "u < 1"
+ shows "(real (n::int) < real (m::int) - u) = (n < m)"
+using u0 u1 by auto
+
+lemma rdvd01_cs:
+ assumes up: "u \<ge> 0" and u1: "u<1" and np: "real n > 0"
+ shows "(real (i::int) rdvd real (n::int) * u - s) = (\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. n - 1}. real n * u = s - real (floor s) + real j \<and> real i rdvd real (j - floor s))" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof-
+ let ?ss = "s - real (floor s)"
+ from real_of_int_floor_add_one_gt[where r="s", simplified myless[rule_format,where a="s"]]
+ real_of_int_floor_le[where r="s"] have ss0:"?ss \<ge> 0" and ss1:"?ss < 1"
+ by (auto simp add: myl[rule_format, where b="s", symmetric] myless[rule_format, where a="?ss"])
+ from np have n0: "real n \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from mult_left_mono[OF up n0] mult_strict_left_mono[OF u1 np]
+ have nu0:"real n * u - s \<ge> -s" and nun:"real n * u -s < real n - s" by auto
+ from int_rdvd_real[where i="i" and x="real (n::int) * u - s"]
+ have "real i rdvd real n * u - s =
+ (i dvd floor (real n * u -s) \<and> (real (floor (real n * u - s)) = real n * u - s ))"
+ (is "_ = (?DE)" is "_ = (?D \<and> ?E)") by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?DE \<and> real(floor (real n * u - s) + floor s)\<ge> -?ss
+ \<and> real(floor (real n * u - s) + floor s)< real n - ?ss)" (is "_=(?DE \<and>real ?a \<ge> _ \<and> real ?a < _)")
+ using nu0 nun by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = (?DE \<and> ?a \<ge> 0 \<and> ?a < n)" by(simp only: small_le[OF ss0 ss1] small_lt[OF ss0 ss1])
+ also have "\<dots> = (?DE \<and> (\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. ?a = j))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?DE \<and> (\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. real (\<lfloor>real n * u - s\<rfloor>) = real j - real \<lfloor>s\<rfloor> ))"
+ by (simp only: algebra_simps real_of_int_diff[symmetric] real_of_int_inject del: real_of_int_diff)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. real n * u - s = real j - real \<lfloor>s\<rfloor> \<and> real i rdvd real n * u - s))" using int_rdvd_iff[where i="i" and t="\<lfloor>real n * u - s\<rfloor>"]
+ by (auto cong: conj_cong)
+ also have "\<dots> = ?rhs" by(simp cong: conj_cong) (simp add: algebra_simps )
+ finally show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+definition
+ DVDJ:: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ DVDJ_def: "DVDJ i n s = (foldr disj (map (\<lambda> j. conj (Eq (CN 0 n (Add s (Sub (Floor (Neg s)) (C j))))) (Dvd i (Sub (C j) (Floor (Neg s))))) (iupt(0,n - 1))) F)"
+
+definition
+ NDVDJ:: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm"
+where
+ NDVDJ_def: "NDVDJ i n s = (foldr conj (map (\<lambda> j. disj (NEq (CN 0 n (Add s (Sub (Floor (Neg s)) (C j))))) (NDvd i (Sub (C j) (Floor (Neg s))))) (iupt(0,n - 1))) T)"
+
+lemma DVDJ_DVD:
+ assumes xp:"x\<ge> 0" and x1: "x < 1" and np:"real n > 0"
+ shows "Ifm (x#bs) (DVDJ i n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Dvd i (CN 0 n s))"
+proof-
+ let ?f = "\<lambda> j. conj (Eq(CN 0 n (Add s (Sub(Floor (Neg s)) (C j))))) (Dvd i (Sub (C j) (Floor (Neg s))))"
+ let ?s= "Inum (x#bs) s"
+ from foldr_disj_map[where xs="iupt(0,n - 1)" and bs="x#bs" and f="?f"]
+ have "Ifm (x#bs) (DVDJ i n s) = (\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. Ifm (x#bs) (?f j))"
+ by (simp add: iupt_set np DVDJ_def del: iupt.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. real n * x = (- ?s) - real (floor (- ?s)) + real j \<and> real i rdvd real (j - floor (- ?s)))" by (simp add: algebra_simps diff_def[symmetric])
+ also from rdvd01_cs[OF xp x1 np, where i="i" and s="-?s"]
+ have "\<dots> = (real i rdvd real n * x - (-?s))" by simp
+ finally show ?thesis by simp
+qed
+
+lemma NDVDJ_NDVD:
+ assumes xp:"x\<ge> 0" and x1: "x < 1" and np:"real n > 0"
+ shows "Ifm (x#bs) (NDVDJ i n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (NDvd i (CN 0 n s))"
+proof-
+ let ?f = "\<lambda> j. disj(NEq(CN 0 n (Add s (Sub (Floor (Neg s)) (C j))))) (NDvd i (Sub (C j) (Floor(Neg s))))"
+ let ?s= "Inum (x#bs) s"
+ from foldr_conj_map[where xs="iupt(0,n - 1)" and bs="x#bs" and f="?f"]
+ have "Ifm (x#bs) (NDVDJ i n s) = (\<forall> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. Ifm (x#bs) (?f j))"
+ by (simp add: iupt_set np NDVDJ_def del: iupt.simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<not> (\<exists> j\<in> {0 .. (n - 1)}. real n * x = (- ?s) - real (floor (- ?s)) + real j \<and> real i rdvd real (j - floor (- ?s))))" by (simp add: algebra_simps diff_def[symmetric])
+ also from rdvd01_cs[OF xp x1 np, where i="i" and s="-?s"]
+ have "\<dots> = (\<not> (real i rdvd real n * x - (-?s)))" by simp
+ finally show ?thesis by simp
+qed
+
+lemma foldr_disj_map_rlfm2:
+ assumes lf: "\<forall> n . isrlfm (f n)"
+ shows "isrlfm (foldr disj (map f xs) F)"
+using lf by (induct xs, auto)
+lemma foldr_And_map_rlfm2:
+ assumes lf: "\<forall> n . isrlfm (f n)"
+ shows "isrlfm (foldr conj (map f xs) T)"
+using lf by (induct xs, auto)
+
+lemma DVDJ_l: assumes ip: "i >0" and np: "n>0" and nb: "numbound0 s"
+ shows "isrlfm (DVDJ i n s)"
+proof-
+ let ?f="\<lambda>j. conj (Eq (CN 0 n (Add s (Sub (Floor (Neg s)) (C j)))))
+ (Dvd i (Sub (C j) (Floor (Neg s))))"
+ have th: "\<forall> j. isrlfm (?f j)" using nb np by auto
+ from DVDJ_def foldr_disj_map_rlfm2[OF th] show ?thesis by simp
+qed
+
+lemma NDVDJ_l: assumes ip: "i >0" and np: "n>0" and nb: "numbound0 s"
+ shows "isrlfm (NDVDJ i n s)"
+proof-
+ let ?f="\<lambda>j. disj (NEq (CN 0 n (Add s (Sub (Floor (Neg s)) (C j)))))
+ (NDvd i (Sub (C j) (Floor (Neg s))))"
+ have th: "\<forall> j. isrlfm (?f j)" using nb np by auto
+ from NDVDJ_def foldr_And_map_rlfm2[OF th] show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+
+definition DVD :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ DVD_def: "DVD i c t =
+ (if i=0 then eq c t else
+ if c = 0 then (Dvd i t) else if c >0 then DVDJ (abs i) c t else DVDJ (abs i) (-c) (Neg t))"
+
+definition NDVD :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "NDVD i c t =
+ (if i=0 then neq c t else
+ if c = 0 then (NDvd i t) else if c >0 then NDVDJ (abs i) c t else NDVDJ (abs i) (-c) (Neg t))"
+
+lemma DVD_mono:
+ assumes xp: "0\<le> x" and x1: "x < 1"
+ shows "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (DVD i n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (Dvd i a)"
+ (is "\<forall> a n s. ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (DVD i n s) = ?I (Dvd i a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)" and nb: "numbound0 s"
+ let ?th = "?I (DVD i n s) = ?I (Dvd i a)"
+ have "i=0 \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> n=0) \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> n < 0) \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> n > 0)" by arith
+ moreover {assume iz: "i=0" hence ?th using eq_mono[rule_format, OF conjI[OF H nb]]
+ by (simp add: DVD_def rdvd_left_0_eq)}
+ moreover {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and "n=0" hence ?th by (simp add: H DVD_def) }
+ moreover {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and "n<0" hence ?th
+ by (simp add: DVD_def H DVDJ_DVD[OF xp x1] rdvd_abs1
+ rdvd_minus[where d="i" and t="real n * x + Inum (x # bs) s"]) }
+ moreover {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and "n>0" hence ?th by (simp add:DVD_def H DVDJ_DVD[OF xp x1] rdvd_abs1)}
+ ultimately show ?th by blast
+qed
+
+lemma NDVD_mono: assumes xp: "0\<le> x" and x1: "x < 1"
+ shows "\<forall> a n s. Inum (x#bs) a = Inum (x#bs) (CN 0 n s) \<and> numbound0 s \<longrightarrow> Ifm (x#bs) (NDVD i n s) = Ifm (x#bs) (NDvd i a)"
+ (is "\<forall> a n s. ?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s) \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> ?I (NDVD i n s) = ?I (NDvd i a)")
+proof(clarify)
+ fix a n s
+ assume H: "?N a = ?N (CN 0 n s)" and nb: "numbound0 s"
+ let ?th = "?I (NDVD i n s) = ?I (NDvd i a)"
+ have "i=0 \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> n=0) \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> n < 0) \<or> (i\<noteq>0 \<and> n > 0)" by arith
+ moreover {assume iz: "i=0" hence ?th using neq_mono[rule_format, OF conjI[OF H nb]]
+ by (simp add: NDVD_def rdvd_left_0_eq)}
+ moreover {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and "n=0" hence ?th by (simp add: H NDVD_def) }
+ moreover {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and "n<0" hence ?th
+ by (simp add: NDVD_def H NDVDJ_NDVD[OF xp x1] rdvd_abs1
+ rdvd_minus[where d="i" and t="real n * x + Inum (x # bs) s"]) }
+ moreover {assume inz: "i\<noteq>0" and "n>0" hence ?th
+ by (simp add:NDVD_def H NDVDJ_NDVD[OF xp x1] rdvd_abs1)}
+ ultimately show ?th by blast
+qed
+
+lemma DVD_l: "isrlfm (rsplit (DVD i) a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="DVD i" and a="a"], auto simp add: DVD_def eq_def DVDJ_l)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+
+lemma NDVD_l: "isrlfm (rsplit (NDVD i) a)"
+ by (rule rsplit_l[where f="NDVD i" and a="a"], auto simp add: NDVD_def neq_def NDVDJ_l)
+(case_tac s, simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+
+consts rlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef rlfm "measure fmsize"
+ "rlfm (And p q) = conj (rlfm p) (rlfm q)"
+ "rlfm (Or p q) = disj (rlfm p) (rlfm q)"
+ "rlfm (Imp p q) = disj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm q)"
+ "rlfm (Iff p q) = disj (conj(rlfm p) (rlfm q)) (conj(rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm (NOT q)))"
+ "rlfm (Lt a) = rsplit lt a"
+ "rlfm (Le a) = rsplit le a"
+ "rlfm (Gt a) = rsplit gt a"
+ "rlfm (Ge a) = rsplit ge a"
+ "rlfm (Eq a) = rsplit eq a"
+ "rlfm (NEq a) = rsplit neq a"
+ "rlfm (Dvd i a) = rsplit (\<lambda> t. DVD i t) a"
+ "rlfm (NDvd i a) = rsplit (\<lambda> t. NDVD i t) a"
+ "rlfm (NOT (And p q)) = disj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm (NOT q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Or p q)) = conj (rlfm (NOT p)) (rlfm (NOT q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Imp p q)) = conj (rlfm p) (rlfm (NOT q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Iff p q)) = disj (conj(rlfm p) (rlfm(NOT q))) (conj(rlfm(NOT p)) (rlfm q))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (NOT p)) = rlfm p"
+ "rlfm (NOT T) = F"
+ "rlfm (NOT F) = T"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Lt a)) = simpfm (rlfm (Ge a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Le a)) = simpfm (rlfm (Gt a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Gt a)) = simpfm (rlfm (Le a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Ge a)) = simpfm (rlfm (Lt a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Eq a)) = simpfm (rlfm (NEq a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (NEq a)) = simpfm (rlfm (Eq a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (Dvd i a)) = simpfm (rlfm (NDvd i a))"
+ "rlfm (NOT (NDvd i a)) = simpfm (rlfm (Dvd i a))"
+ "rlfm p = p" (hints simp add: fmsize_pos)
+
+lemma bound0at_l : "\<lbrakk>isatom p ; bound0 p\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm p"
+ by (induct p rule: isrlfm.induct, auto)
+lemma zgcd_le1: assumes ip: "0 < i" shows "zgcd i j \<le> i"
+proof-
+ from zgcd_zdvd1 have th: "zgcd i j dvd i" by blast
+ from zdvd_imp_le[OF th ip] show ?thesis .
+qed
+
+
+lemma simpfm_rl: "isrlfm p \<Longrightarrow> isrlfm (simpfm p)"
+proof (induct p)
+ case (Lt a)
+ hence "bound0 (Lt a) \<or> (\<exists> c e. a = CN 0 c e \<and> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ by (cases a,simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+ moreover
+ {assume "bound0 (Lt a)" hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (Lt a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (Lt a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {fix c e assume "a = CN 0 c e" and "c>0" and "numbound0 e"
+ {
+ assume cn1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 1" and cnz:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 0"
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="CN 0 c (simpnum e)"]
+ have th1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) > 0" by simp
+ from prems have th:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<le> c"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def zgcd_le1)
+ from prems have th': "c\<noteq>0" by auto
+ from prems have cp: "c \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from zdiv_mono2[OF cp th1 th, simplified zdiv_self[OF th']]
+ have "0 < c div numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e))" by simp
+ }
+ with prems have ?case
+ by (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (Le a)
+ hence "bound0 (Le a) \<or> (\<exists> c e. a = CN 0 c e \<and> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ by (cases a,simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+ moreover
+ {assume "bound0 (Le a)" hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (Le a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (Le a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {fix c e assume "a = CN 0 c e" and "c>0" and "numbound0 e"
+ {
+ assume cn1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 1" and cnz:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 0"
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="CN 0 c (simpnum e)"]
+ have th1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) > 0" by simp
+ from prems have th:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<le> c"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def zgcd_le1)
+ from prems have th': "c\<noteq>0" by auto
+ from prems have cp: "c \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from zdiv_mono2[OF cp th1 th, simplified zdiv_self[OF th']]
+ have "0 < c div numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e))" by simp
+ }
+ with prems have ?case
+ by (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def simpnum_numbound0 reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (Gt a)
+ hence "bound0 (Gt a) \<or> (\<exists> c e. a = CN 0 c e \<and> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ by (cases a,simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+ moreover
+ {assume "bound0 (Gt a)" hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (Gt a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (Gt a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {fix c e assume "a = CN 0 c e" and "c>0" and "numbound0 e"
+ {
+ assume cn1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 1" and cnz:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 0"
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="CN 0 c (simpnum e)"]
+ have th1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) > 0" by simp
+ from prems have th:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<le> c"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def zgcd_le1)
+ from prems have th': "c\<noteq>0" by auto
+ from prems have cp: "c \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from zdiv_mono2[OF cp th1 th, simplified zdiv_self[OF th']]
+ have "0 < c div numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e))" by simp
+ }
+ with prems have ?case
+ by (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def simpnum_numbound0 reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (Ge a)
+ hence "bound0 (Ge a) \<or> (\<exists> c e. a = CN 0 c e \<and> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ by (cases a,simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+ moreover
+ {assume "bound0 (Ge a)" hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (Ge a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (Ge a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {fix c e assume "a = CN 0 c e" and "c>0" and "numbound0 e"
+ {
+ assume cn1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 1" and cnz:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 0"
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="CN 0 c (simpnum e)"]
+ have th1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) > 0" by simp
+ from prems have th:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<le> c"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def zgcd_le1)
+ from prems have th': "c\<noteq>0" by auto
+ from prems have cp: "c \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from zdiv_mono2[OF cp th1 th, simplified zdiv_self[OF th']]
+ have "0 < c div numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e))" by simp
+ }
+ with prems have ?case
+ by (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def simpnum_numbound0 reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (Eq a)
+ hence "bound0 (Eq a) \<or> (\<exists> c e. a = CN 0 c e \<and> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ by (cases a,simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+ moreover
+ {assume "bound0 (Eq a)" hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (Eq a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (Eq a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {fix c e assume "a = CN 0 c e" and "c>0" and "numbound0 e"
+ {
+ assume cn1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 1" and cnz:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 0"
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="CN 0 c (simpnum e)"]
+ have th1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) > 0" by simp
+ from prems have th:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<le> c"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def zgcd_le1)
+ from prems have th': "c\<noteq>0" by auto
+ from prems have cp: "c \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from zdiv_mono2[OF cp th1 th, simplified zdiv_self[OF th']]
+ have "0 < c div numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e))" by simp
+ }
+ with prems have ?case
+ by (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def simpnum_numbound0 reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (NEq a)
+ hence "bound0 (NEq a) \<or> (\<exists> c e. a = CN 0 c e \<and> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e)"
+ by (cases a,simp_all, case_tac "nat", simp_all)
+ moreover
+ {assume "bound0 (NEq a)" hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (NEq a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (NEq a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l have ?case by blast}
+ moreover
+ {fix c e assume "a = CN 0 c e" and "c>0" and "numbound0 e"
+ {
+ assume cn1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 1" and cnz:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<noteq> 0"
+ with numgcd_pos[where t="CN 0 c (simpnum e)"]
+ have th1:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) > 0" by simp
+ from prems have th:"numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e)) \<le> c"
+ by (simp add: numgcd_def zgcd_le1)
+ from prems have th': "c\<noteq>0" by auto
+ from prems have cp: "c \<ge> 0" by simp
+ from zdiv_mono2[OF cp th1 th, simplified zdiv_self[OF th']]
+ have "0 < c div numgcd (CN 0 c (simpnum e))" by simp
+ }
+ with prems have ?case
+ by (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def simpnum_numbound0 reducecoeffh_numbound0)}
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (Dvd i a) hence "bound0 (Dvd i a)" by auto hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (Dvd i a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (Dvd i a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (NDvd i a) hence "bound0 (NDvd i a)" by auto hence bn:"bound0 (simpfm (NDvd i a))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ have "isatom (simpfm (NDvd i a))" by (cases "simpnum a", auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
+ with bn bound0at_l show ?case by blast
+qed(auto simp add: conj_def imp_def disj_def iff_def Let_def simpfm_bound0 numadd_nb numneg_nb)
+
+lemma rlfm_I:
+ assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ and xp: "0 \<le> x" and x1: "x < 1"
+ shows "(Ifm (x#bs) (rlfm p) = Ifm (x# bs) p) \<and> isrlfm (rlfm p)"
+ using qfp
+by (induct p rule: rlfm.induct)
+(auto simp add: rsplit[OF xp x1 lt_mono] lt_l rsplit[OF xp x1 le_mono] le_l rsplit[OF xp x1 gt_mono] gt_l
+ rsplit[OF xp x1 ge_mono] ge_l rsplit[OF xp x1 eq_mono] eq_l rsplit[OF xp x1 neq_mono] neq_l
+ rsplit[OF xp x1 DVD_mono[OF xp x1]] DVD_l rsplit[OF xp x1 NDVD_mono[OF xp x1]] NDVD_l simpfm_rl)
+lemma rlfm_l:
+ assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "isrlfm (rlfm p)"
+ using qfp lt_l gt_l ge_l le_l eq_l neq_l DVD_l NDVD_l
+by (induct p rule: rlfm.induct,auto simp add: simpfm_rl)
+
+ (* Operations needed for Ferrante and Rackoff *)
+lemma rminusinf_inf:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "\<exists> z. \<forall> x < z. Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> z. \<forall> x. ?P z x p")
+using lp
+proof (induct p rule: minusinf.induct)
+ case (1 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "min z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (2 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "min z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x < ?z"
+ hence "(real c * x < - ?e)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="- ?e"] mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e < 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x < ?z. ?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma rplusinf_inf:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "\<exists> z. \<forall> x > z. Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p) = Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> z. \<forall> x. ?P z x p")
+using lp
+proof (induct p rule: isrlfm.induct)
+ case (1 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "max z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (2 p q) thus ?case by (auto,rule_tac x= "max z za" in exI) auto
+next
+ case (3 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Eq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (4 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ hence "real c * x + ?e \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (NEq (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (5 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Lt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Le (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Gt (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e)
+ from prems have nb: "numbound0 e" by simp
+ from prems have cp: "real c > 0" by simp
+ fix a
+ let ?e="Inum (a#bs) e"
+ let ?z = "(- ?e) / real c"
+ {fix x
+ assume xz: "x > ?z"
+ with mult_strict_right_mono [OF xz cp] cp
+ have "(real c * x > - ?e)" by (simp add: mult_ac)
+ hence "real c * x + ?e > 0" by arith
+ with xz have "?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where b="x" and bs="bs" and b'="a"] by simp }
+ hence "\<forall> x > ?z. ?P ?z x (Ge (CN 0 c e))" by simp
+ thus ?case by blast
+qed simp_all
+
+lemma rminusinf_bound0:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "bound0 (minusinf p)"
+ using lp
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma rplusinf_bound0:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "bound0 (plusinf p)"
+ using lp
+ by (induct p rule: plusinf.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma rminusinf_ex:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and ex: "Ifm (a#bs) (minusinf p)"
+ shows "\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+proof-
+ from bound0_I [OF rminusinf_bound0[OF lp], where b="a" and bs ="bs"] ex
+ have th: "\<forall> x. Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p)" by auto
+ from rminusinf_inf[OF lp, where bs="bs"]
+ obtain z where z_def: "\<forall>x<z. Ifm (x # bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm (x # bs) p" by blast
+ from th have "Ifm ((z - 1)#bs) (minusinf p)" by simp
+ moreover have "z - 1 < z" by simp
+ ultimately show ?thesis using z_def by auto
+qed
+
+lemma rplusinf_ex:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and ex: "Ifm (a#bs) (plusinf p)"
+ shows "\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+proof-
+ from bound0_I [OF rplusinf_bound0[OF lp], where b="a" and bs ="bs"] ex
+ have th: "\<forall> x. Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p)" by auto
+ from rplusinf_inf[OF lp, where bs="bs"]
+ obtain z where z_def: "\<forall>x>z. Ifm (x # bs) (plusinf p) = Ifm (x # bs) p" by blast
+ from th have "Ifm ((z + 1)#bs) (plusinf p)" by simp
+ moreover have "z + 1 > z" by simp
+ ultimately show ?thesis using z_def by auto
+qed
+
+consts
+ \<Upsilon>:: "fm \<Rightarrow> (num \<times> int) list"
+ \<upsilon> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (num \<times> int) \<Rightarrow> fm "
+recdef \<Upsilon> "measure size"
+ "\<Upsilon> (And p q) = (\<Upsilon> p @ \<Upsilon> q)"
+ "\<Upsilon> (Or p q) = (\<Upsilon> p @ \<Upsilon> q)"
+ "\<Upsilon> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<Upsilon> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<Upsilon> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<Upsilon> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<Upsilon> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<Upsilon> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = [(Neg e,c)]"
+ "\<Upsilon> p = []"
+
+recdef \<upsilon> "measure size"
+ "\<upsilon> (And p q) = (\<lambda> (t,n). And (\<upsilon> p (t,n)) (\<upsilon> q (t,n)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (Or p q) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Or (\<upsilon> p (t,n)) (\<upsilon> q (t,n)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Eq (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). NEq (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Lt (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Le (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Gt (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "\<upsilon> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (\<lambda> (t,n). Ge (Add (Mul c t) (Mul n e)))"
+ "\<upsilon> p = (\<lambda> (t,n). p)"
+
+lemma \<upsilon>_I: assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and np: "real n > 0" and nbt: "numbound0 t"
+ shows "(Ifm (x#bs) (\<upsilon> p (t,n)) = Ifm (((Inum (x#bs) t)/(real n))#bs) p) \<and> bound0 (\<upsilon> p (t,n))" (is "(?I x (\<upsilon> p (t,n)) = ?I ?u p) \<and> ?B p" is "(_ = ?I (?t/?n) p) \<and> _" is "(_ = ?I (?N x t /_) p) \<and> _")
+ using lp
+proof(induct p rule: \<upsilon>.induct)
+ case (5 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) < 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) < 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) < 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (6 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Le (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) \<le> 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) \<le> 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) \<le> 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (7 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) > 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) > 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_less_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) > 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (8 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ have "?I ?u (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) \<ge> 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) \<ge> 0)"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_le_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) \<ge> 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (3 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from np have np: "real n \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "?I ?u (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) = 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) = 0)"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) = 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+next
+ case (4 c e) from prems have cp: "c >0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from np have np: "real n \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ have "?I ?u (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = (real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e) \<noteq> 0)"
+ using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="?u" and b'="x"] by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = (?n*(real c *(?t/?n)) + ?n*(?N x e) \<noteq> 0)"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF np, where a="real c *(?t/?n) + (?N x e)"
+ and b="0", simplified divide_zero_left]) (simp only: algebra_simps)
+ also have "\<dots> = (real c *?t + ?n* (?N x e) \<noteq> 0)"
+ using np by simp
+ finally show ?case using nbt nb by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+qed(simp_all add: nbt numbound0_I[where bs ="bs" and b="(Inum (x#bs) t)/ real n" and b'="x"] nth_pos2)
+
+lemma \<Upsilon>_l:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "\<forall> (t,k) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). numbound0 t \<and> k >0"
+using lp
+by(induct p rule: \<Upsilon>.induct) auto
+
+lemma rminusinf_\<Upsilon>:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (minusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (?M p))")
+ and ex: "Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "?I x p")
+ shows "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). x \<ge> Inum (a#bs) s / real m" (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. x \<ge> ?N a s / real m")
+proof-
+ have "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). real m * x \<ge> Inum (a#bs) s " (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. real m *x \<ge> ?N a s")
+ using lp nmi ex
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto simp add:numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"] nth_pos2)
+ then obtain s m where smU: "(s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p)" and mx: "real m * x \<ge> ?N a s" by blast
+ from \<Upsilon>_l[OF lp] smU have mp: "real m > 0" by auto
+ from pos_divide_le_eq[OF mp, where a="x" and b="?N a s", symmetric] mx have "x \<ge> ?N a s / real m"
+ by (auto simp add: mult_commute)
+ thus ?thesis using smU by auto
+qed
+
+lemma rplusinf_\<Upsilon>:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (plusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (a#bs) (?M p))")
+ and ex: "Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "?I x p")
+ shows "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). x \<le> Inum (a#bs) s / real m" (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. x \<le> ?N a s / real m")
+proof-
+ have "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). real m * x \<le> Inum (a#bs) s " (is "\<exists> (s,m) \<in> ?U p. real m *x \<le> ?N a s")
+ using lp nmi ex
+ by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct, auto simp add:numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"] nth_pos2)
+ then obtain s m where smU: "(s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p)" and mx: "real m * x \<le> ?N a s" by blast
+ from \<Upsilon>_l[OF lp] smU have mp: "real m > 0" by auto
+ from pos_le_divide_eq[OF mp, where a="x" and b="?N a s", symmetric] mx have "x \<le> ?N a s / real m"
+ by (auto simp add: mult_commute)
+ thus ?thesis using smU by auto
+qed
+
+lemma lin_dense:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and noS: "\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> (\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t / real n) ` set (\<Upsilon> p)"
+ (is "\<forall> t. _ \<and> _ \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> (\<lambda> (t,n). ?N x t / real n ) ` (?U p)")
+ and lx: "l < x" and xu:"x < u" and px:" Ifm (x#bs) p"
+ and ly: "l < y" and yu: "y < u"
+ shows "Ifm (y#bs) p"
+using lp px noS
+proof (induct p rule: isrlfm.induct)
+ case (5 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e < 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x < (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c < - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e < 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with yu have eu: "u > (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<le> l" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with lx pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (6 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp +
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e \<le> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x \<le> (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c < - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_less_divide_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e < 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with yu have eu: "u > (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<le> l" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with lx pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (7 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x > (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_less_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c > - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_divide_less_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with ly have eu: "l < (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<ge> u" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with xu pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (8 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e \<ge> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x \<ge> (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: pos_divide_le_eq[OF cp, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y < (- ?N x e) / real c \<or> y > (-?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ moreover {assume y: "y > (-?N x e)/ real c"
+ hence "y * real c > - ?N x e"
+ by (simp add: pos_divide_less_eq[OF cp, where a="y" and b="-?N x e", symmetric])
+ hence "real c * y + ?N x e > 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"] by simp}
+ moreover {assume y: "y < (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ with ly have eu: "l < (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with noSc ly yu have "(- ?N x e) / real c \<ge> u" by (cases "(- ?N x e) / real c > l", auto)
+ with xu pxc have "False" by auto
+ hence ?case by simp }
+ ultimately show ?case by blast
+next
+ case (3 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from cp have cnz: "real c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems have "x * real c + ?N x e = 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ hence pxc: "x = (- ?N x e) / real c"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF cnz, where a="x" and b="-?N x e"])
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with lx xu have yne: "x \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ with pxc show ?case by simp
+next
+ case (4 c e) hence cp: "real c > 0" and nb: "numbound0 e" by simp+
+ from cp have cnz: "real c \<noteq> 0" by simp
+ from prems have noSc:"\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<noteq> (- ?N x e) / real c" by auto
+ with ly yu have yne: "y \<noteq> - ?N x e / real c" by auto
+ hence "y* real c \<noteq> -?N x e"
+ by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF cnz, where a="y" and b="-?N x e"]) simp
+ hence "y* real c + ?N x e \<noteq> 0" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+ thus ?case using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="y"]
+ by (simp add: algebra_simps)
+qed (auto simp add: nth_pos2 numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="y" and b'="x"])
+
+lemma finite_set_intervals:
+ assumes px: "P (x::real)"
+ and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u"
+ and linS: "l\<in> S" and uinS: "u \<in> S"
+ and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
+ shows "\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x"
+proof-
+ let ?Mx = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> y \<le> x}"
+ let ?xM = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> x \<le> y}"
+ let ?a = "Max ?Mx"
+ let ?b = "Min ?xM"
+ have MxS: "?Mx \<subseteq> S" by blast
+ hence fMx: "finite ?Mx" using fS finite_subset by auto
+ from lx linS have linMx: "l \<in> ?Mx" by blast
+ hence Mxne: "?Mx \<noteq> {}" by blast
+ have xMS: "?xM \<subseteq> S" by blast
+ hence fxM: "finite ?xM" using fS finite_subset by auto
+ from xu uinS have linxM: "u \<in> ?xM" by blast
+ hence xMne: "?xM \<noteq> {}" by blast
+ have ax:"?a \<le> x" using Mxne fMx by auto
+ have xb:"x \<le> ?b" using xMne fxM by auto
+ have "?a \<in> ?Mx" using Max_in[OF fMx Mxne] by simp hence ainS: "?a \<in> S" using MxS by blast
+ have "?b \<in> ?xM" using Min_in[OF fxM xMne] by simp hence binS: "?b \<in> S" using xMS by blast
+ have noy:"\<forall> y. ?a < y \<and> y < ?b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S"
+ proof(clarsimp)
+ fix y
+ assume ay: "?a < y" and yb: "y < ?b" and yS: "y \<in> S"
+ from yS have "y\<in> ?Mx \<or> y\<in> ?xM" by auto
+ moreover {assume "y \<in> ?Mx" hence "y \<le> ?a" using Mxne fMx by auto with ay have "False" by simp}
+ moreover {assume "y \<in> ?xM" hence "y \<ge> ?b" using xMne fxM by auto with yb have "False" by simp}
+ ultimately show "False" by blast
+ qed
+ from ainS binS noy ax xb px show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma finite_set_intervals2:
+ assumes px: "P (x::real)"
+ and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u"
+ and linS: "l\<in> S" and uinS: "u \<in> S"
+ and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
+ shows "(\<exists> s\<in> S. P s) \<or> (\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a < x \<and> x < b \<and> P x)"
+proof-
+ from finite_set_intervals[where P="P", OF px lx xu linS uinS fS lS Su]
+ obtain a and b where
+ as: "a\<in> S" and bs: "b\<in> S" and noS:"\<forall>y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S" and axb: "a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x" by auto
+ from axb have "x= a \<or> x= b \<or> (a < x \<and> x < b)" by auto
+ thus ?thesis using px as bs noS by blast
+qed
+
+lemma rinf_\<Upsilon>:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and nmi: "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (?M p))")
+ and npi: "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p))" (is "\<not> (Ifm (x#bs) (?P p))")
+ and ex: "\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p" (is "\<exists> x. ?I x p")
+ shows "\<exists> (l,n) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). ?I ((Inum (x#bs) l / real n + Inum (x#bs) s / real m) / 2) p"
+proof-
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> x t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?U = "set (\<Upsilon> p)"
+ from ex obtain a where pa: "?I a p" by blast
+ from bound0_I[OF rminusinf_bound0[OF lp], where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="a"] nmi
+ have nmi': "\<not> (?I a (?M p))" by simp
+ from bound0_I[OF rplusinf_bound0[OF lp], where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="a"] npi
+ have npi': "\<not> (?I a (?P p))" by simp
+ have "\<exists> (l,n) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). ?I ((?N a l/real n + ?N a s /real m) / 2) p"
+ proof-
+ let ?M = "(\<lambda> (t,c). ?N a t / real c) ` ?U"
+ have fM: "finite ?M" by auto
+ from rminusinf_\<Upsilon>[OF lp nmi pa] rplusinf_\<Upsilon>[OF lp npi pa]
+ have "\<exists> (l,n) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). a \<le> ?N x l / real n \<and> a \<ge> ?N x s / real m" by blast
+ then obtain "t" "n" "s" "m" where
+ tnU: "(t,n) \<in> ?U" and smU: "(s,m) \<in> ?U"
+ and xs1: "a \<le> ?N x s / real m" and tx1: "a \<ge> ?N x t / real n" by blast
+ from \<Upsilon>_l[OF lp] tnU smU numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="a"] xs1 tx1 have xs: "a \<le> ?N a s / real m" and tx: "a \<ge> ?N a t / real n" by auto
+ from tnU have Mne: "?M \<noteq> {}" by auto
+ hence Une: "?U \<noteq> {}" by simp
+ let ?l = "Min ?M"
+ let ?u = "Max ?M"
+ have linM: "?l \<in> ?M" using fM Mne by simp
+ have uinM: "?u \<in> ?M" using fM Mne by simp
+ have tnM: "?N a t / real n \<in> ?M" using tnU by auto
+ have smM: "?N a s / real m \<in> ?M" using smU by auto
+ have lM: "\<forall> t\<in> ?M. ?l \<le> t" using Mne fM by auto
+ have Mu: "\<forall> t\<in> ?M. t \<le> ?u" using Mne fM by auto
+ have "?l \<le> ?N a t / real n" using tnM Mne by simp hence lx: "?l \<le> a" using tx by simp
+ have "?N a s / real m \<le> ?u" using smM Mne by simp hence xu: "a \<le> ?u" using xs by simp
+ from finite_set_intervals2[where P="\<lambda> x. ?I x p",OF pa lx xu linM uinM fM lM Mu]
+ have "(\<exists> s\<in> ?M. ?I s p) \<or>
+ (\<exists> t1\<in> ?M. \<exists> t2 \<in> ?M. (\<forall> y. t1 < y \<and> y < t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> ?M) \<and> t1 < a \<and> a < t2 \<and> ?I a p)" .
+ moreover { fix u assume um: "u\<in> ?M" and pu: "?I u p"
+ hence "\<exists> (tu,nu) \<in> ?U. u = ?N a tu / real nu" by auto
+ then obtain "tu" "nu" where tuU: "(tu,nu) \<in> ?U" and tuu:"u= ?N a tu / real nu" by blast
+ have "(u + u) / 2 = u" by auto with pu tuu
+ have "?I (((?N a tu / real nu) + (?N a tu / real nu)) / 2) p" by simp
+ with tuU have ?thesis by blast}
+ moreover{
+ assume "\<exists> t1\<in> ?M. \<exists> t2 \<in> ?M. (\<forall> y. t1 < y \<and> y < t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> ?M) \<and> t1 < a \<and> a < t2 \<and> ?I a p"
+ then obtain t1 and t2 where t1M: "t1 \<in> ?M" and t2M: "t2\<in> ?M"
+ and noM: "\<forall> y. t1 < y \<and> y < t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> ?M" and t1x: "t1 < a" and xt2: "a < t2" and px: "?I a p"
+ by blast
+ from t1M have "\<exists> (t1u,t1n) \<in> ?U. t1 = ?N a t1u / real t1n" by auto
+ then obtain "t1u" "t1n" where t1uU: "(t1u,t1n) \<in> ?U" and t1u: "t1 = ?N a t1u / real t1n" by blast
+ from t2M have "\<exists> (t2u,t2n) \<in> ?U. t2 = ?N a t2u / real t2n" by auto
+ then obtain "t2u" "t2n" where t2uU: "(t2u,t2n) \<in> ?U" and t2u: "t2 = ?N a t2u / real t2n" by blast
+ from t1x xt2 have t1t2: "t1 < t2" by simp
+ let ?u = "(t1 + t2) / 2"
+ from less_half_sum[OF t1t2] gt_half_sum[OF t1t2] have t1lu: "t1 < ?u" and ut2: "?u < t2" by auto
+ from lin_dense[OF lp noM t1x xt2 px t1lu ut2] have "?I ?u p" .
+ with t1uU t2uU t1u t2u have ?thesis by blast}
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+ then obtain "l" "n" "s" "m" where lnU: "(l,n) \<in> ?U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> ?U"
+ and pu: "?I ((?N a l / real n + ?N a s / real m) / 2) p" by blast
+ from lnU smU \<Upsilon>_l[OF lp] have nbl: "numbound0 l" and nbs: "numbound0 s" by auto
+ from numbound0_I[OF nbl, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
+ numbound0_I[OF nbs, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"] pu
+ have "?I ((?N x l / real n + ?N x s / real m) / 2) p" by simp
+ with lnU smU
+ show ?thesis by auto
+qed
+ (* The Ferrante - Rackoff Theorem *)
+
+theorem fr_eq:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p) = ((Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). Ifm ((((Inum (x#bs) t)/ real n + (Inum (x#bs) s) / real m) /2)#bs) p))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x p) = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F)" is "?E = ?D")
+proof
+ assume px: "\<exists> x. ?I x p"
+ have "?M \<or> ?P \<or> (\<not> ?M \<and> \<not> ?P)" by blast
+ moreover {assume "?M \<or> ?P" hence "?D" by blast}
+ moreover {assume nmi: "\<not> ?M" and npi: "\<not> ?P"
+ from rinf_\<Upsilon>[OF lp nmi npi] have "?F" using px by blast hence "?D" by blast}
+ ultimately show "?D" by blast
+next
+ assume "?D"
+ moreover {assume m:"?M" from rminusinf_ex[OF lp m] have "?E" .}
+ moreover {assume p: "?P" from rplusinf_ex[OF lp p] have "?E" . }
+ moreover {assume f:"?F" hence "?E" by blast}
+ ultimately show "?E" by blast
+qed
+
+
+lemma fr_eq\<upsilon>:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p) = ((Ifm (x#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (Ifm (x#bs) (plusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> (t,k) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). \<exists> (s,l) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). Ifm (x#bs) (\<upsilon> p (Add(Mul l t) (Mul k s) , 2*k*l))))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x p) = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F)" is "?E = ?D")
+proof
+ assume px: "\<exists> x. ?I x p"
+ have "?M \<or> ?P \<or> (\<not> ?M \<and> \<not> ?P)" by blast
+ moreover {assume "?M \<or> ?P" hence "?D" by blast}
+ moreover {assume nmi: "\<not> ?M" and npi: "\<not> ?P"
+ let ?f ="\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t / real n"
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ {fix t n s m assume "(t,n)\<in> set (\<Upsilon> p)" and "(s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p)"
+ with \<Upsilon>_l[OF lp] have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np:"real n > 0" and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"real m > 0"
+ by auto
+ let ?st = "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute)
+ from tnb snb have st_nb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mnp mp np by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from \<upsilon>_I[OF lp mnp st_nb, where x="x" and bs="bs"]
+ have "?I x (\<upsilon> p (?st,2*n*m)) = ?I ((?N t / real n + ?N s / real m) /2) p" by (simp only: st[symmetric])}
+ with rinf_\<Upsilon>[OF lp nmi npi px] have "?F" by blast hence "?D" by blast}
+ ultimately show "?D" by blast
+next
+ assume "?D"
+ moreover {assume m:"?M" from rminusinf_ex[OF lp m] have "?E" .}
+ moreover {assume p: "?P" from rplusinf_ex[OF lp p] have "?E" . }
+ moreover {fix t k s l assume "(t,k) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p)" and "(s,l) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p)"
+ and px:"?I x (\<upsilon> p (Add (Mul l t) (Mul k s), 2*k*l))"
+ with \<Upsilon>_l[OF lp] have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np:"real k > 0" and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"real l > 0" by auto
+ let ?st = "Add (Mul l t) (Mul k s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*k*l) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute)
+ from tnb snb have st_nb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ from \<upsilon>_I[OF lp mnp st_nb, where bs="bs"] px have "?E" by auto}
+ ultimately show "?E" by blast
+qed
+
+text{* The overall Part *}
+
+lemma real_ex_int_real01:
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::real). P x) = (\<exists> (i::int) (u::real). 0\<le> u \<and> u< 1 \<and> P (real i + u))"
+proof(auto)
+ fix x
+ assume Px: "P x"
+ let ?i = "floor x"
+ let ?u = "x - real ?i"
+ have "x = real ?i + ?u" by simp
+ hence "P (real ?i + ?u)" using Px by simp
+ moreover have "real ?i \<le> x" using real_of_int_floor_le by simp hence "0 \<le> ?u" by arith
+ moreover have "?u < 1" using real_of_int_floor_add_one_gt[where r="x"] by arith
+ ultimately show "(\<exists> (i::int) (u::real). 0\<le> u \<and> u< 1 \<and> P (real i + u))" by blast
+qed
+
+consts exsplitnum :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
+ exsplit :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+recdef exsplitnum "measure size"
+ "exsplitnum (C c) = (C c)"
+ "exsplitnum (Bound 0) = Add (Bound 0) (Bound 1)"
+ "exsplitnum (Bound n) = Bound (n+1)"
+ "exsplitnum (Neg a) = Neg (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplitnum (Add a b) = Add (exsplitnum a) (exsplitnum b) "
+ "exsplitnum (Sub a b) = Sub (exsplitnum a) (exsplitnum b) "
+ "exsplitnum (Mul c a) = Mul c (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplitnum (Floor a) = Floor (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplitnum (CN 0 c a) = CN 0 c (Add (Mul c (Bound 1)) (exsplitnum a))"
+ "exsplitnum (CN n c a) = CN (n+1) c (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplitnum (CF c s t) = CF c (exsplitnum s) (exsplitnum t)"
+
+recdef exsplit "measure size"
+ "exsplit (Lt a) = Lt (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (Le a) = Le (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (Gt a) = Gt (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (Ge a) = Ge (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (Eq a) = Eq (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (NEq a) = NEq (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (exsplitnum a)"
+ "exsplit (And p q) = And (exsplit p) (exsplit q)"
+ "exsplit (Or p q) = Or (exsplit p) (exsplit q)"
+ "exsplit (Imp p q) = Imp (exsplit p) (exsplit q)"
+ "exsplit (Iff p q) = Iff (exsplit p) (exsplit q)"
+ "exsplit (NOT p) = NOT (exsplit p)"
+ "exsplit p = p"
+
+lemma exsplitnum:
+ "Inum (x#y#bs) (exsplitnum t) = Inum ((x+y) #bs) t"
+ by(induct t rule: exsplitnum.induct) (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
+
+lemma exsplit:
+ assumes qfp: "qfree p"
+ shows "Ifm (x#y#bs) (exsplit p) = Ifm ((x+y)#bs) p"
+using qfp exsplitnum[where x="x" and y="y" and bs="bs"]
+by(induct p rule: exsplit.induct) simp_all
+
+lemma splitex:
+ assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "(Ifm bs (E p)) = (\<exists> (i::int). Ifm (real i#bs) (E (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) (exsplit p))))" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof-
+ have "?rhs = (\<exists> (i::int). \<exists> x. 0\<le> x \<and> x < 1 \<and> Ifm (x#(real i)#bs) (exsplit p))"
+ by (simp add: myless[rule_format, where b="1"] myless[rule_format, where b="0"] add_ac diff_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (i::int). \<exists> x. 0\<le> x \<and> x < 1 \<and> Ifm ((real i + x) #bs) p)"
+ by (simp only: exsplit[OF qf] add_ac)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) p)"
+ by (simp only: real_ex_int_real01[where P="\<lambda> x. Ifm (x#bs) p"])
+ finally show ?thesis by simp
+qed
+
+ (* Implement the right hand sides of Cooper's theorem and Ferrante and Rackoff. *)
+
+constdefs ferrack01:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "ferrack01 p \<equiv> (let p' = rlfm(And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p);
+ U = remdups(map simp_num_pair
+ (map (\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s) , 2*n*m))
+ (alluopairs (\<Upsilon> p'))))
+ in decr (evaldjf (\<upsilon> p') U ))"
+
+lemma fr_eq_01:
+ assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "(\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p)) = (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> (rlfm (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p))). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> (rlfm (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p))). Ifm (x#bs) (\<upsilon> (rlfm (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p)) (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2*n*m)))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x ?q) = ?F")
+proof-
+ let ?rq = "rlfm ?q"
+ let ?M = "?I x (minusinf ?rq)"
+ let ?P = "?I x (plusinf ?rq)"
+ have MF: "?M = False"
+ apply (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def numgcd_def zgcd_def rsplit_def ge_def lt_def conj_def disj_def)
+ by (cases "rlfm p = And (Ge (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C -1)))", simp_all)
+ have PF: "?P = False" apply (simp add: Let_def reducecoeff_def numgcd_def zgcd_def rsplit_def ge_def lt_def conj_def disj_def)
+ by (cases "rlfm p = And (Ge (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C -1)))", simp_all)
+ have "(\<exists> x. ?I x ?q ) =
+ ((?I x (minusinf ?rq)) \<or> (?I x (plusinf ?rq )) \<or> (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> ?rq). \<exists> (s,m) \<in> set (\<Upsilon> ?rq ). ?I x (\<upsilon> ?rq (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2*n*m))))"
+ (is "(\<exists> x. ?I x ?q) = (?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F)" is "?E = ?D")
+ proof
+ assume "\<exists> x. ?I x ?q"
+ then obtain x where qx: "?I x ?q" by blast
+ hence xp: "0\<le> x" and x1: "x< 1" and px: "?I x p"
+ by (auto simp add: rsplit_def lt_def ge_def rlfm_I[OF qf])
+ from qx have "?I x ?rq "
+ by (simp add: rsplit_def lt_def ge_def rlfm_I[OF qf xp x1])
+ hence lqx: "?I x ?rq " using simpfm[where p="?rq" and bs="x#bs"] by auto
+ from qf have qfq:"isrlfm ?rq"
+ by (auto simp add: rsplit_def lt_def ge_def rlfm_I[OF qf xp x1])
+ with lqx fr_eq\<upsilon>[OF qfq] show "?M \<or> ?P \<or> ?F" by blast
+ next
+ assume D: "?D"
+ let ?U = "set (\<Upsilon> ?rq )"
+ from MF PF D have "?F" by auto
+ then obtain t n s m where aU:"(t,n) \<in> ?U" and bU:"(s,m)\<in> ?U" and rqx: "?I x (\<upsilon> ?rq (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2*n*m))" by blast
+ from qf have lrq:"isrlfm ?rq"using rlfm_l[OF qf]
+ by (auto simp add: rsplit_def lt_def ge_def)
+ from aU bU \<Upsilon>_l[OF lrq] have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np:"real n > 0" and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"real m > 0" by (auto simp add: split_def)
+ let ?st = "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from tnb snb have stnb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute)
+ from conjunct1[OF \<upsilon>_I[OF lrq mnp stnb, where bs="bs" and x="x"], symmetric] rqx
+ have "\<exists> x. ?I x ?rq" by auto
+ thus "?E"
+ using rlfm_I[OF qf] by (auto simp add: rsplit_def lt_def ge_def)
+ qed
+ with MF PF show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma \<Upsilon>_cong_aux:
+ assumes Ul: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set U. numbound0 t \<and> n >0"
+ shows "((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t /real n) ` (set (map (\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s) , 2*n*m)) (alluopairs U)))) = ((\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Inum (x#bs) t /real n + Inum (x#bs) s /real m)/2) ` (set U \<times> set U))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof(auto)
+ fix t n s m
+ assume "((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> set (alluopairs U)"
+ hence th: "((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> (set U \<times> set U)"
+ using alluopairs_set1[where xs="U"] by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from Ul th have mnz: "m \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ from Ul th have nnz: "n \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mnz nnz by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+
+ thus "(real m * Inum (x # bs) t + real n * Inum (x # bs) s) /
+ (2 * real n * real m)
+ \<in> (\<lambda>((t, n), s, m).
+ (Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m) / 2) `
+ (set U \<times> set U)"using mnz nnz th
+ apply (auto simp add: th add_divide_distrib algebra_simps split_def image_def)
+ by (rule_tac x="(s,m)" in bexI,simp_all)
+ (rule_tac x="(t,n)" in bexI,simp_all)
+next
+ fix t n s m
+ assume tnU: "(t,n) \<in> set U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> set U"
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from Ul smU have mnz: "m \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ from Ul tnU have nnz: "n \<noteq> 0" by auto
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mnz nnz by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ let ?P = "\<lambda> (t',n') (s',m'). (Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m)/2 = (Inum (x # bs) t' / real n' + Inum (x # bs) s' / real m')/2"
+ have Pc:"\<forall> a b. ?P a b = ?P b a"
+ by auto
+ from Ul alluopairs_set1 have Up:"\<forall> ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> set (alluopairs U). n \<noteq> 0 \<and> m \<noteq> 0" by blast
+ from alluopairs_ex[OF Pc, where xs="U"] tnU smU
+ have th':"\<exists> ((t',n'),(s',m')) \<in> set (alluopairs U). ?P (t',n') (s',m')"
+ by blast
+ then obtain t' n' s' m' where ts'_U: "((t',n'),(s',m')) \<in> set (alluopairs U)"
+ and Pts': "?P (t',n') (s',m')" by blast
+ from ts'_U Up have mnz': "m' \<noteq> 0" and nnz': "n'\<noteq> 0" by auto
+ let ?st' = "Add (Mul m' t') (Mul n' s')"
+ have st': "(?N t' / real n' + ?N s' / real m')/2 = ?N ?st' / real (2*n'*m')"
+ using mnz' nnz' by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from Pts' have
+ "(Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m)/2 = (Inum (x # bs) t' / real n' + Inum (x # bs) s' / real m')/2" by simp
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<lambda>(t, n). Inum (x # bs) t / real n) ((\<lambda>((t, n), s, m). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2 * n * m)) ((t',n'),(s',m'))))" by (simp add: st')
+ finally show "(Inum (x # bs) t / real n + Inum (x # bs) s / real m) / 2
+ \<in> (\<lambda>(t, n). Inum (x # bs) t / real n) `
+ (\<lambda>((t, n), s, m). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s), 2 * n * m)) `
+ set (alluopairs U)"
+ using ts'_U by blast
+qed
+
+lemma \<Upsilon>_cong:
+ assumes lp: "isrlfm p"
+ and UU': "((\<lambda> (t,n). Inum (x#bs) t /real n) ` U') = ((\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Inum (x#bs) t /real n + Inum (x#bs) s /real m)/2) ` (U \<times> U))" (is "?f ` U' = ?g ` (U\<times>U)")
+ and U: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> U. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0"
+ and U': "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> U'. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> (t,n) \<in> U. \<exists> (s,m) \<in> U. Ifm (x#bs) (\<upsilon> p (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s),2*n*m))) = (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> U'. Ifm (x#bs) (\<upsilon> p (t,n)))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof
+ assume ?lhs
+ then obtain t n s m where tnU: "(t,n) \<in> U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> U" and
+ Pst: "Ifm (x#bs) (\<upsilon> p (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s),2*n*m))" by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ from tnU smU U have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "n > 0"
+ and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"m > 0" by auto
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult)
+ from tnb snb have stnb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mp np by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from tnU smU UU' have "?g ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> ?f ` U'" by blast
+ hence "\<exists> (t',n') \<in> U'. ?g ((t,n),(s,m)) = ?f (t',n')"
+ by auto (rule_tac x="(a,b)" in bexI, auto)
+ then obtain t' n' where tnU': "(t',n') \<in> U'" and th: "?g ((t,n),(s,m)) = ?f (t',n')" by blast
+ from U' tnU' have tnb': "numbound0 t'" and np': "real n' > 0" by auto
+ from \<upsilon>_I[OF lp mnp stnb, where bs="bs" and x="x"] Pst
+ have Pst2: "Ifm (Inum (x # bs) (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)) / real (2 * n * m) # bs) p" by simp
+ from conjunct1[OF \<upsilon>_I[OF lp np' tnb', where bs="bs" and x="x"], symmetric] th[simplified split_def fst_conv snd_conv,symmetric] Pst2[simplified st[symmetric]]
+ have "Ifm (x # bs) (\<upsilon> p (t', n')) " by (simp only: st)
+ then show ?rhs using tnU' by auto
+next
+ assume ?rhs
+ then obtain t' n' where tnU': "(t',n') \<in> U'" and Pt': "Ifm (x # bs) (\<upsilon> p (t', n'))"
+ by blast
+ from tnU' UU' have "?f (t',n') \<in> ?g ` (U\<times>U)" by blast
+ hence "\<exists> ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> (U\<times>U). ?f (t',n') = ?g ((t,n),(s,m))"
+ by auto (rule_tac x="(a,b)" in bexI, auto)
+ then obtain t n s m where tnU: "(t,n) \<in> U" and smU:"(s,m) \<in> U" and
+ th: "?f (t',n') = ?g((t,n),(s,m)) "by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ from tnU smU U have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "n > 0"
+ and snb: "numbound0 s" and mp:"m > 0" by auto
+ let ?st= "Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)"
+ from mult_pos_pos[OF np mp] have mnp: "real (2*n*m) > 0"
+ by (simp add: mult_commute real_of_int_mult[symmetric] del: real_of_int_mult)
+ from tnb snb have stnb: "numbound0 ?st" by simp
+ have st: "(?N t / real n + ?N s / real m)/2 = ?N ?st / real (2*n*m)"
+ using mp np by (simp add: algebra_simps add_divide_distrib)
+ from U' tnU' have tnb': "numbound0 t'" and np': "real n' > 0" by auto
+ from \<upsilon>_I[OF lp np' tnb', where bs="bs" and x="x",simplified th[simplified split_def fst_conv snd_conv] st] Pt'
+ have Pst2: "Ifm (Inum (x # bs) (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s)) / real (2 * n * m) # bs) p" by simp
+ with \<upsilon>_I[OF lp mnp stnb, where x="x" and bs="bs"] tnU smU show ?lhs by blast
+qed
+
+lemma ferrack01:
+ assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "((\<exists> x. Ifm (x#bs) (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p)) = (Ifm bs (ferrack01 p))) \<and> qfree (ferrack01 p)" (is "(?lhs = ?rhs) \<and> _")
+proof-
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> x p. Ifm (x#bs) p"
+ fix x
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (x#bs) t"
+ let ?q = "rlfm (And (And (Ge(CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) p)"
+ let ?U = "\<Upsilon> ?q"
+ let ?Up = "alluopairs ?U"
+ let ?g = "\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (Add (Mul m t) (Mul n s) , 2*n*m)"
+ let ?S = "map ?g ?Up"
+ let ?SS = "map simp_num_pair ?S"
+ let ?Y = "remdups ?SS"
+ let ?f= "(\<lambda> (t,n). ?N t / real n)"
+ let ?h = "\<lambda> ((t,n),(s,m)). (?N t/real n + ?N s/ real m) /2"
+ let ?F = "\<lambda> p. \<exists> a \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). \<exists> b \<in> set (\<Upsilon> p). ?I x (\<upsilon> p (?g(a,b)))"
+ let ?ep = "evaldjf (\<upsilon> ?q) ?Y"
+ from rlfm_l[OF qf] have lq: "isrlfm ?q"
+ by (simp add: rsplit_def lt_def ge_def conj_def disj_def Let_def reducecoeff_def numgcd_def zgcd_def)
+ from alluopairs_set1[where xs="?U"] have UpU: "set ?Up \<le> (set ?U \<times> set ?U)" by simp
+ from \<Upsilon>_l[OF lq] have U_l: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?U. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0" .
+ from U_l UpU
+ have Up_: "\<forall> ((t,n),(s,m)) \<in> set ?Up. numbound0 t \<and> n> 0 \<and> numbound0 s \<and> m > 0" by auto
+ hence Snb: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?S. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0 "
+ by (auto simp add: mult_pos_pos)
+ have Y_l: "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?Y. numbound0 t \<and> n > 0"
+ proof-
+ { fix t n assume tnY: "(t,n) \<in> set ?Y"
+ hence "(t,n) \<in> set ?SS" by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (t',n') \<in> set ?S. simp_num_pair (t',n') = (t,n)"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def) (rule_tac x="((aa,ba),(ab,bb))" in bexI, simp_all)
+ then obtain t' n' where tn'S: "(t',n') \<in> set ?S" and tns: "simp_num_pair (t',n') = (t,n)" by blast
+ from tn'S Snb have tnb: "numbound0 t'" and np: "n' > 0" by auto
+ from simp_num_pair_l[OF tnb np tns]
+ have "numbound0 t \<and> n > 0" . }
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+
+ have YU: "(?f ` set ?Y) = (?h ` (set ?U \<times> set ?U))"
+ proof-
+ from simp_num_pair_ci[where bs="x#bs"] have
+ "\<forall>x. (?f o simp_num_pair) x = ?f x" by auto
+ hence th: "?f o simp_num_pair = ?f" using ext by blast
+ have "(?f ` set ?Y) = ((?f o simp_num_pair) ` set ?S)" by (simp add: image_compose)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?f ` set ?S)" by (simp add: th)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((?f o ?g) ` set ?Up)"
+ by (simp only: set_map o_def image_compose[symmetric])
+ also have "\<dots> = (?h ` (set ?U \<times> set ?U))"
+ using \<Upsilon>_cong_aux[OF U_l, where x="x" and bs="bs", simplified set_map image_compose[symmetric]] by blast
+ finally show ?thesis .
+ qed
+ have "\<forall> (t,n) \<in> set ?Y. bound0 (\<upsilon> ?q (t,n))"
+ proof-
+ { fix t n assume tnY: "(t,n) \<in> set ?Y"
+ with Y_l have tnb: "numbound0 t" and np: "real n > 0" by auto
+ from \<upsilon>_I[OF lq np tnb]
+ have "bound0 (\<upsilon> ?q (t,n))" by simp}
+ thus ?thesis by blast
+ qed
+ hence ep_nb: "bound0 ?ep" using evaldjf_bound0[where xs="?Y" and f="\<upsilon> ?q"]
+ by auto
+
+ from fr_eq_01[OF qf, where bs="bs" and x="x"] have "?lhs = ?F ?q"
+ by (simp only: split_def fst_conv snd_conv)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (t,n) \<in> set ?Y. ?I x (\<upsilon> ?q (t,n)))" using \<Upsilon>_cong[OF lq YU U_l Y_l]
+ by (simp only: split_def fst_conv snd_conv)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm (x#bs) ?ep)"
+ using evaldjf_ex[where ps="?Y" and bs = "x#bs" and f="\<upsilon> ?q",symmetric]
+ by (simp only: split_def pair_collapse)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm bs (decr ?ep))" using decr[OF ep_nb] by blast
+ finally have lr: "?lhs = ?rhs" by (simp only: ferrack01_def Let_def)
+ from decr_qf[OF ep_nb] have "qfree (ferrack01 p)" by (simp only: Let_def ferrack01_def)
+ with lr show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma cp_thm':
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ and up: "d\<beta> p 1" and dd: "d\<delta> p d" and dp: "d > 0"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1 .. d}. Ifm (real j#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. d}. \<exists> b\<in> (Inum (real i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> p). Ifm ((b+real j)#bs) p))"
+ using cp_thm[OF lp up dd dp] by auto
+
+constdefs unit:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<times> num list \<times> int"
+ "unit p \<equiv> (let p' = zlfm p ; l = \<zeta> p' ; q = And (Dvd l (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (a\<beta> p' l); d = \<delta> q;
+ B = remdups (map simpnum (\<beta> q)) ; a = remdups (map simpnum (\<alpha> q))
+ in if length B \<le> length a then (q,B,d) else (mirror q, a,d))"
+
+lemma unit: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "\<And> q B d. unit p = (q,B,d) \<Longrightarrow> ((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) q)) \<and> (Inum (real i#bs)) ` set B = (Inum (real i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> q) \<and> d\<beta> q 1 \<and> d\<delta> q d \<and> d >0 \<and> iszlfm q (real (i::int)#bs) \<and> (\<forall> b\<in> set B. numbound0 b)"
+proof-
+ fix q B d
+ assume qBd: "unit p = (q,B,d)"
+ let ?thes = "((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) q)) \<and>
+ Inum (real i#bs) ` set B = Inum (real i#bs) ` set (\<beta> q) \<and>
+ d\<beta> q 1 \<and> d\<delta> q d \<and> 0 < d \<and> iszlfm q (real i # bs) \<and> (\<forall> b\<in> set B. numbound0 b)"
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> (x::int) p. Ifm (real x#bs) p"
+ let ?p' = "zlfm p"
+ let ?l = "\<zeta> ?p'"
+ let ?q = "And (Dvd ?l (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (a\<beta> ?p' ?l)"
+ let ?d = "\<delta> ?q"
+ let ?B = "set (\<beta> ?q)"
+ let ?B'= "remdups (map simpnum (\<beta> ?q))"
+ let ?A = "set (\<alpha> ?q)"
+ let ?A'= "remdups (map simpnum (\<alpha> ?q))"
+ from conjunct1[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs"]]
+ have pp': "\<forall> i. ?I i ?p' = ?I i p" by auto
+ from iszlfm_gen[OF conjunct2[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs" and i="i"]]]
+ have lp': "\<forall> (i::int). iszlfm ?p' (real i#bs)" by simp
+ hence lp'': "iszlfm ?p' (real (i::int)#bs)" by simp
+ from lp' \<zeta>[where p="?p'" and bs="bs"] have lp: "?l >0" and dl: "d\<beta> ?p' ?l" by auto
+ from a\<beta>_ex[where p="?p'" and l="?l" and bs="bs", OF lp'' dl lp] pp'
+ have pq_ex:"(\<exists> (x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> x. ?I x ?q)" by (simp add: int_rdvd_iff)
+ from lp'' lp a\<beta>[OF lp'' dl lp] have lq:"iszlfm ?q (real i#bs)" and uq: "d\<beta> ?q 1"
+ by (auto simp add: isint_def)
+ from \<delta>[OF lq] have dp:"?d >0" and dd: "d\<delta> ?q ?d" by blast+
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real (i::int)#bs) t"
+ have "?N ` set ?B' = ((?N o simpnum) ` ?B)" by (simp add:image_compose)
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?B" using simpnum_ci[where bs="real i #bs"] by auto
+ finally have BB': "?N ` set ?B' = ?N ` ?B" .
+ have "?N ` set ?A' = ((?N o simpnum) ` ?A)" by (simp add:image_compose)
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?A" using simpnum_ci[where bs="real i #bs"] by auto
+ finally have AA': "?N ` set ?A' = ?N ` ?A" .
+ from \<beta>_numbound0[OF lq] have B_nb:"\<forall> b\<in> set ?B'. numbound0 b"
+ by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0)
+ from \<alpha>_l[OF lq] have A_nb: "\<forall> b\<in> set ?A'. numbound0 b"
+ by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0)
+ {assume "length ?B' \<le> length ?A'"
+ hence q:"q=?q" and "B = ?B'" and d:"d = ?d"
+ using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def unit_def)
+ with BB' B_nb have b: "?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<beta> q)"
+ and bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b" by simp+
+ with pq_ex dp uq dd lq q d have ?thes by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> (length ?B' \<le> length ?A')"
+ hence q:"q=mirror ?q" and "B = ?A'" and d:"d = ?d"
+ using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def unit_def)
+ with AA' mirror\<alpha>\<beta>[OF lq] A_nb have b:"?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<beta> q)"
+ and bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b" by simp+
+ from mirror_ex[OF lq] pq_ex q
+ have pqm_eq:"(\<exists> (x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?I x q)" by simp
+ from lq uq q mirror_d\<beta> [where p="?q" and bs="bs" and a="real i"]
+ have lq': "iszlfm q (real i#bs)" and uq: "d\<beta> q 1" by auto
+ from \<delta>[OF lq'] mirror_\<delta>[OF lq] q d have dq:"d\<delta> q d " by auto
+ from pqm_eq b bn uq lq' dp dq q dp d have ?thes by simp
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thes by blast
+qed
+ (* Cooper's Algorithm *)
+
+constdefs cooper :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "cooper p \<equiv>
+ (let (q,B,d) = unit p; js = iupt (1,d);
+ mq = simpfm (minusinf q);
+ md = evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) mq)) js
+ in if md = T then T else
+ (let qd = evaldjf (\<lambda> t. simpfm (subst0 t q))
+ (remdups (map (\<lambda> (b,j). simpnum (Add b (C j)))
+ [(b,j). b\<leftarrow>B,j\<leftarrow>js]))
+ in decr (disj md qd)))"
+lemma cooper: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (Ifm bs (cooper p))) \<and> qfree (cooper p)"
+ (is "(?lhs = ?rhs) \<and> _")
+proof-
+
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> (x::int) p. Ifm (real x#bs) p"
+ let ?q = "fst (unit p)"
+ let ?B = "fst (snd(unit p))"
+ let ?d = "snd (snd (unit p))"
+ let ?js = "iupt (1,?d)"
+ let ?mq = "minusinf ?q"
+ let ?smq = "simpfm ?mq"
+ let ?md = "evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js"
+ fix i
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> t. Inum (real (i::int)#bs) t"
+ let ?bjs = "[(b,j). b\<leftarrow>?B,j\<leftarrow>?js]"
+ let ?sbjs = "map (\<lambda> (b,j). simpnum (Add b (C j))) ?bjs"
+ let ?qd = "evaldjf (\<lambda> t. simpfm (subst0 t ?q)) (remdups ?sbjs)"
+ have qbf:"unit p = (?q,?B,?d)" by simp
+ from unit[OF qf qbf] have pq_ex: "(\<exists>(x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?I x ?q)" and
+ B:"?N ` set ?B = ?N ` set (\<beta> ?q)" and
+ uq:"d\<beta> ?q 1" and dd: "d\<delta> ?q ?d" and dp: "?d > 0" and
+ lq: "iszlfm ?q (real i#bs)" and
+ Bn: "\<forall> b\<in> set ?B. numbound0 b" by auto
+ from zlin_qfree[OF lq] have qfq: "qfree ?q" .
+ from simpfm_qf[OF minusinf_qfree[OF qfq]] have qfmq: "qfree ?smq".
+ have jsnb: "\<forall> j \<in> set ?js. numbound0 (C j)" by simp
+ hence "\<forall> j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (subst0 (C j) ?smq)"
+ by (auto simp only: subst0_bound0[OF qfmq])
+ hence th: "\<forall> j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))"
+ by (auto simp add: simpfm_bound0)
+ from evaldjf_bound0[OF th] have mdb: "bound0 ?md" by simp
+ from Bn jsnb have "\<forall> (b,j) \<in> set ?bjs. numbound0 (Add b (C j))"
+ by simp
+ hence "\<forall> (b,j) \<in> set ?bjs. numbound0 (simpnum (Add b (C j)))"
+ using simpnum_numbound0 by blast
+ hence "\<forall> t \<in> set ?sbjs. numbound0 t" by simp
+ hence "\<forall> t \<in> set (remdups ?sbjs). bound0 (subst0 t ?q)"
+ using subst0_bound0[OF qfq] by auto
+ hence th': "\<forall> t \<in> set (remdups ?sbjs). bound0 (simpfm (subst0 t ?q))"
+ using simpfm_bound0 by blast
+ from evaldjf_bound0 [OF th'] have qdb: "bound0 ?qd" by simp
+ from mdb qdb
+ have mdqdb: "bound0 (disj ?md ?qd)" by (simp only: disj_def, cases "?md=T \<or> ?qd=T", simp_all)
+ from trans [OF pq_ex cp_thm'[OF lq uq dd dp]] B
+ have "?lhs = (\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq \<or> (\<exists> b\<in> ?N ` set ?B. Ifm ((b+ real j)#bs) ?q))" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. ?I j ?smq) \<or> (\<exists> (b,j) \<in> (?N ` set ?B \<times> set ?js). Ifm ((b+ real j)#bs) ?q))" apply (simp only: iupt_set simpfm) by auto
+ also have "\<dots>= ((\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. ?I j ?smq) \<or> (\<exists> t \<in> (\<lambda> (b,j). ?N (Add b (C j))) ` set ?bjs. Ifm (t #bs) ?q))" by simp
+ also have "\<dots>= ((\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. ?I j ?smq) \<or> (\<exists> t \<in> (\<lambda> (b,j). ?N (simpnum (Add b (C j)))) ` set ?bjs. Ifm (t #bs) ?q))" by (simp only: simpnum_ci)
+ also have "\<dots>= ((\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. ?I j ?smq) \<or> (\<exists> t \<in> set ?sbjs. Ifm (?N t #bs) ?q))"
+ by (auto simp add: split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> set ?js. (\<lambda> j. ?I i (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))) j) \<or> (\<exists> t \<in> set (remdups ?sbjs). (\<lambda> t. ?I i (simpfm (subst0 t ?q))) t))" by (simp only: simpfm subst0_I[OF qfq] simpfm Inum.simps subst0_I[OF qfmq] set_remdups)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((?I i (evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js)) \<or> (?I i (evaldjf (\<lambda> t. simpfm (subst0 t ?q)) (remdups ?sbjs))))" by (simp only: evaldjf_ex)
+ finally have mdqd: "?lhs = (?I i (disj ?md ?qd))" by (simp add: disj)
+ hence mdqd2: "?lhs = (Ifm bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd)))" using decr [OF mdqdb] by simp
+ {assume mdT: "?md = T"
+ hence cT:"cooper p = T"
+ by (simp only: cooper_def unit_def split_def Let_def if_True) simp
+ from mdT mdqd have lhs:"?lhs" by (auto simp add: disj)
+ from mdT have "?rhs" by (simp add: cooper_def unit_def split_def)
+ with lhs cT have ?thesis by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume mdT: "?md \<noteq> T" hence "cooper p = decr (disj ?md ?qd)"
+ by (simp only: cooper_def unit_def split_def Let_def if_False)
+ with mdqd2 decr_qf[OF mdqdb] have ?thesis by simp }
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma DJcooper:
+ assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (Ifm bs (DJ cooper p))) \<and> qfree (DJ cooper p)"
+proof-
+ from cooper have cqf: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (cooper p)" by blast
+ from DJ_qf[OF cqf] qf have thqf:"qfree (DJ cooper p)" by blast
+ have "Ifm bs (DJ cooper p) = (\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs (cooper q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> q \<in> set(disjuncts p). \<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) q)"
+ using cooper disjuncts_qf[OF qf] by blast
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p)" by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show ?thesis using thqf by blast
+qed
+
+ (* Redy and Loveland *)
+
+lemma \<sigma>\<rho>_cong: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)" and tt': "Inum (a#bs) t = Inum (a#bs) t'"
+ shows "Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t,c)) = Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma>\<rho> p (t',c))"
+ using lp
+ by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct, auto simp add: tt')
+
+lemma \<sigma>_cong: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)" and tt': "Inum (a#bs) t = Inum (a#bs) t'"
+ shows "Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c t) = Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c t')"
+ by (simp add: \<sigma>_def tt' \<sigma>\<rho>_cong[OF lp tt'])
+
+lemma \<rho>_cong: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)"
+ and RR: "(\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` R = (\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` set (\<rho> p)"
+ shows "(\<exists> (e,c) \<in> R. \<exists> j\<in> {1.. c*(\<delta> p)}. Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))) = (\<exists> (e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p). \<exists> j\<in> {1.. c*(\<delta> p)}. Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j))))"
+ (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
+proof
+ let ?d = "\<delta> p"
+ assume ?lhs then obtain e c j where ecR: "(e,c) \<in> R" and jD:"j \<in> {1 .. c*?d}"
+ and px: "Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))" (is "?sp c e j") by blast
+ from ecR have "(Inum (a#bs) e,c) \<in> (\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` R" by auto
+ hence "(Inum (a#bs) e,c) \<in> (\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` set (\<rho> p)" using RR by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (e',c') \<in> set (\<rho> p). Inum (a#bs) e = Inum (a#bs) e' \<and> c = c'" by auto
+ then obtain e' c' where ecRo:"(e',c') \<in> set (\<rho> p)" and ee':"Inum (a#bs) e = Inum (a#bs) e'"
+ and cc':"c = c'" by blast
+ from ee' have tt': "Inum (a#bs) (Add e (C j)) = Inum (a#bs) (Add e' (C j))" by simp
+
+ from \<sigma>_cong[OF lp tt', where c="c"] px have px':"?sp c e' j" by simp
+ from ecRo jD px' cc' show ?rhs apply auto
+ by (rule_tac x="(e', c')" in bexI,simp_all)
+ (rule_tac x="j" in bexI, simp_all add: cc'[symmetric])
+next
+ let ?d = "\<delta> p"
+ assume ?rhs then obtain e c j where ecR: "(e,c) \<in> set (\<rho> p)" and jD:"j \<in> {1 .. c*?d}"
+ and px: "Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))" (is "?sp c e j") by blast
+ from ecR have "(Inum (a#bs) e,c) \<in> (\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` set (\<rho> p)" by auto
+ hence "(Inum (a#bs) e,c) \<in> (\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` R" using RR by simp
+ hence "\<exists> (e',c') \<in> R. Inum (a#bs) e = Inum (a#bs) e' \<and> c = c'" by auto
+ then obtain e' c' where ecRo:"(e',c') \<in> R" and ee':"Inum (a#bs) e = Inum (a#bs) e'"
+ and cc':"c = c'" by blast
+ from ee' have tt': "Inum (a#bs) (Add e (C j)) = Inum (a#bs) (Add e' (C j))" by simp
+ from \<sigma>_cong[OF lp tt', where c="c"] px have px':"?sp c e' j" by simp
+ from ecRo jD px' cc' show ?lhs apply auto
+ by (rule_tac x="(e', c')" in bexI,simp_all)
+ (rule_tac x="j" in bexI, simp_all add: cc'[symmetric])
+qed
+
+lemma rl_thm':
+ assumes lp: "iszlfm p (real (i::int)#bs)"
+ and R: "(\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` R = (\<lambda>(b,k). (Inum (a#bs) b,k)) ` set (\<rho> p)"
+ shows "(\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1 .. \<delta> p}. Ifm (real j#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or> (\<exists> (e,c) \<in> R. \<exists> j\<in> {1.. c*(\<delta> p)}. Ifm (a#bs) (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))))"
+ using rl_thm[OF lp] \<rho>_cong[OF iszlfm_gen[OF lp, rule_format, where y="a"] R] by simp
+
+constdefs chooset:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<times> ((num\<times>int) list) \<times> int"
+ "chooset p \<equiv> (let q = zlfm p ; d = \<delta> q;
+ B = remdups (map (\<lambda> (t,k). (simpnum t,k)) (\<rho> q)) ;
+ a = remdups (map (\<lambda> (t,k). (simpnum t,k)) (\<alpha>\<rho> q))
+ in if length B \<le> length a then (q,B,d) else (mirror q, a,d))"
+
+lemma chooset: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "\<And> q B d. chooset p = (q,B,d) \<Longrightarrow> ((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) q)) \<and> ((\<lambda>(t,k). (Inum (real i#bs) t,k)) ` set B = (\<lambda>(t,k). (Inum (real i#bs) t,k)) ` set (\<rho> q)) \<and> (\<delta> q = d) \<and> d >0 \<and> iszlfm q (real (i::int)#bs) \<and> (\<forall> (e,c)\<in> set B. numbound0 e \<and> c>0)"
+proof-
+ fix q B d
+ assume qBd: "chooset p = (q,B,d)"
+ let ?thes = "((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) q)) \<and> ((\<lambda>(t,k). (Inum (real i#bs) t,k)) ` set B = (\<lambda>(t,k). (Inum (real i#bs) t,k)) ` set (\<rho> q)) \<and> (\<delta> q = d) \<and> d >0 \<and> iszlfm q (real (i::int)#bs) \<and> (\<forall> (e,c)\<in> set B. numbound0 e \<and> c>0)"
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> (x::int) p. Ifm (real x#bs) p"
+ let ?q = "zlfm p"
+ let ?d = "\<delta> ?q"
+ let ?B = "set (\<rho> ?q)"
+ let ?f = "\<lambda> (t,k). (simpnum t,k)"
+ let ?B'= "remdups (map ?f (\<rho> ?q))"
+ let ?A = "set (\<alpha>\<rho> ?q)"
+ let ?A'= "remdups (map ?f (\<alpha>\<rho> ?q))"
+ from conjunct1[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs"]]
+ have pp': "\<forall> i. ?I i ?q = ?I i p" by auto
+ hence pq_ex:"(\<exists> (x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> x. ?I x ?q)" by simp
+ from iszlfm_gen[OF conjunct2[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs" and i="i"]], rule_format, where y="real i"]
+ have lq: "iszlfm ?q (real (i::int)#bs)" .
+ from \<delta>[OF lq] have dp:"?d >0" by blast
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> (t,c). (Inum (real (i::int)#bs) t,c)"
+ have "?N ` set ?B' = ((?N o ?f) ` ?B)" by (simp add: split_def image_compose)
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?B"
+ by(simp add: split_def image_compose simpnum_ci[where bs="real i #bs"] image_def)
+ finally have BB': "?N ` set ?B' = ?N ` ?B" .
+ have "?N ` set ?A' = ((?N o ?f) ` ?A)" by (simp add: split_def image_compose)
+ also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?A" using simpnum_ci[where bs="real i #bs"]
+ by(simp add: split_def image_compose simpnum_ci[where bs="real i #bs"] image_def)
+ finally have AA': "?N ` set ?A' = ?N ` ?A" .
+ from \<rho>_l[OF lq] have B_nb:"\<forall> (e,c)\<in> set ?B'. numbound0 e \<and> c > 0"
+ by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0 split_def)
+ from \<alpha>\<rho>_l[OF lq] have A_nb: "\<forall> (e,c)\<in> set ?A'. numbound0 e \<and> c > 0"
+ by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0 split_def)
+ {assume "length ?B' \<le> length ?A'"
+ hence q:"q=?q" and "B = ?B'" and d:"d = ?d"
+ using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def chooset_def)
+ with BB' B_nb have b: "?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<rho> q)"
+ and bn: "\<forall>(e,c)\<in> set B. numbound0 e \<and> c > 0" by auto
+ with pq_ex dp lq q d have ?thes by simp}
+ moreover
+ {assume "\<not> (length ?B' \<le> length ?A')"
+ hence q:"q=mirror ?q" and "B = ?A'" and d:"d = ?d"
+ using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def chooset_def)
+ with AA' mirror_\<alpha>\<rho>[OF lq] A_nb have b:"?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<rho> q)"
+ and bn: "\<forall>(e,c)\<in> set B. numbound0 e \<and> c > 0" by auto
+ from mirror_ex[OF lq] pq_ex q
+ have pqm_eq:"(\<exists> (x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?I x q)" by simp
+ from lq q mirror_l [where p="?q" and bs="bs" and a="real i"]
+ have lq': "iszlfm q (real i#bs)" by auto
+ from mirror_\<delta>[OF lq] pqm_eq b bn lq' dp q dp d have ?thes by simp
+ }
+ ultimately show ?thes by blast
+qed
+
+constdefs stage:: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> (num \<times> int) \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "stage p d \<equiv> (\<lambda> (e,c). evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))) (iupt (1,c*d)))"
+lemma stage:
+ shows "Ifm bs (stage p d (e,c)) = (\<exists> j\<in>{1 .. c*d}. Ifm bs (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j))))"
+ by (unfold stage_def split_def ,simp only: evaldjf_ex iupt_set simpfm) simp
+
+lemma stage_nb: assumes lp: "iszlfm p (a#bs)" and cp: "c >0" and nb:"numbound0 e"
+ shows "bound0 (stage p d (e,c))"
+proof-
+ let ?f = "\<lambda> j. simpfm (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j)))"
+ have th: "\<forall> j\<in> set (iupt(1,c*d)). bound0 (?f j)"
+ proof
+ fix j
+ from nb have nb':"numbound0 (Add e (C j))" by simp
+ from simpfm_bound0[OF \<sigma>_nb[OF lp nb', where k="c"]]
+ show "bound0 (simpfm (\<sigma> p c (Add e (C j))))" .
+ qed
+ from evaldjf_bound0[OF th] show ?thesis by (unfold stage_def split_def) simp
+qed
+
+constdefs redlove:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
+ "redlove p \<equiv>
+ (let (q,B,d) = chooset p;
+ mq = simpfm (minusinf q);
+ md = evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) mq)) (iupt (1,d))
+ in if md = T then T else
+ (let qd = evaldjf (stage q d) B
+ in decr (disj md qd)))"
+
+lemma redlove: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (Ifm bs (redlove p))) \<and> qfree (redlove p)"
+ (is "(?lhs = ?rhs) \<and> _")
+proof-
+
+ let ?I = "\<lambda> (x::int) p. Ifm (real x#bs) p"
+ let ?q = "fst (chooset p)"
+ let ?B = "fst (snd(chooset p))"
+ let ?d = "snd (snd (chooset p))"
+ let ?js = "iupt (1,?d)"
+ let ?mq = "minusinf ?q"
+ let ?smq = "simpfm ?mq"
+ let ?md = "evaldjf (\<lambda> j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js"
+ fix i
+ let ?N = "\<lambda> (t,k). (Inum (real (i::int)#bs) t,k)"
+ let ?qd = "evaldjf (stage ?q ?d) ?B"
+ have qbf:"chooset p = (?q,?B,?d)" by simp
+ from chooset[OF qf qbf] have pq_ex: "(\<exists>(x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists> (x::int). ?I x ?q)" and
+ B:"?N ` set ?B = ?N ` set (\<rho> ?q)" and dd: "\<delta> ?q = ?d" and dp: "?d > 0" and
+ lq: "iszlfm ?q (real i#bs)" and
+ Bn: "\<forall> (e,c)\<in> set ?B. numbound0 e \<and> c > 0" by auto
+ from zlin_qfree[OF lq] have qfq: "qfree ?q" .
+ from simpfm_qf[OF minusinf_qfree[OF qfq]] have qfmq: "qfree ?smq".
+ have jsnb: "\<forall> j \<in> set ?js. numbound0 (C j)" by simp
+ hence "\<forall> j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (subst0 (C j) ?smq)"
+ by (auto simp only: subst0_bound0[OF qfmq])
+ hence th: "\<forall> j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))"
+ by (auto simp add: simpfm_bound0)
+ from evaldjf_bound0[OF th] have mdb: "bound0 ?md" by simp
+ from Bn stage_nb[OF lq] have th:"\<forall> x \<in> set ?B. bound0 (stage ?q ?d x)" by auto
+ from evaldjf_bound0[OF th] have qdb: "bound0 ?qd" .
+ from mdb qdb
+ have mdqdb: "bound0 (disj ?md ?qd)" by (simp only: disj_def, cases "?md=T \<or> ?qd=T", simp_all)
+ from trans [OF pq_ex rl_thm'[OF lq B]] dd
+ have "?lhs = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq) \<or> (\<exists> (e,c)\<in> set ?B. \<exists> j\<in> {1 .. c*?d}. Ifm (real i#bs) (\<sigma> ?q c (Add e (C j)))))" by auto
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?smq) \<or> (\<exists> (e,c)\<in> set ?B. ?I i (stage ?q ?d (e,c) )))"
+ by (simp add: simpfm stage split_def)
+ also have "\<dots> = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1 .. ?d}. ?I i (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) \<or> ?I i ?qd)"
+ by (simp add: evaldjf_ex subst0_I[OF qfmq])
+ finally have mdqd:"?lhs = (?I i ?md \<or> ?I i ?qd)" by (simp only: evaldjf_ex iupt_set simpfm)
+ also have "\<dots> = (?I i (disj ?md ?qd))" by (simp add: disj)
+ also have "\<dots> = (Ifm bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd)))" by (simp only: decr [OF mdqdb])
+ finally have mdqd2: "?lhs = (Ifm bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd)))" .
+ {assume mdT: "?md = T"
+ hence cT:"redlove p = T" by (simp add: redlove_def Let_def chooset_def split_def)
+ from mdT have lhs:"?lhs" using mdqd by simp
+ from mdT have "?rhs" by (simp add: redlove_def chooset_def split_def)
+ with lhs cT have ?thesis by simp }
+ moreover
+ {assume mdT: "?md \<noteq> T" hence "redlove p = decr (disj ?md ?qd)"
+ by (simp add: redlove_def chooset_def split_def Let_def)
+ with mdqd2 decr_qf[OF mdqdb] have ?thesis by simp }
+ ultimately show ?thesis by blast
+qed
+
+lemma DJredlove:
+ assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "((\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p) = (Ifm bs (DJ redlove p))) \<and> qfree (DJ redlove p)"
+proof-
+ from redlove have cqf: "\<forall> p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (redlove p)" by blast
+ from DJ_qf[OF cqf] qf have thqf:"qfree (DJ redlove p)" by blast
+ have "Ifm bs (DJ redlove p) = (\<exists> q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bs (redlove q))"
+ by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> q \<in> set(disjuncts p). \<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) q)"
+ using redlove disjuncts_qf[OF qf] by blast
+ also have "\<dots> = (\<exists> (x::int). Ifm (real x#bs) p)" by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct, auto)
+ finally show ?thesis using thqf by blast
+qed
+
+
+lemma exsplit_qf: assumes qf: "qfree p"
+ shows "qfree (exsplit p)"
+using qf by (induct p rule: exsplit.induct, auto)
+
+definition mircfr :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "mircfr = DJ cooper o ferrack01 o simpfm o exsplit"
+
+definition mirlfr :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "mirlfr = DJ redlove o ferrack01 o simpfm o exsplit"
+
+lemma mircfr: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (mircfr p) \<and> Ifm bs (mircfr p) = Ifm bs (E p)"
+proof(clarsimp simp del: Ifm.simps)
+ fix bs p
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ show "qfree (mircfr p)\<and>(Ifm bs (mircfr p) = Ifm bs (E p))" (is "_ \<and> (?lhs = ?rhs)")
+ proof-
+ let ?es = "(And (And (Ge (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) (simpfm (exsplit p)))"
+ have "?rhs = (\<exists> (i::int). \<exists> x. Ifm (x#real i#bs) ?es)"
+ using splitex[OF qf] by simp
+ with ferrack01[OF simpfm_qf[OF exsplit_qf[OF qf]]] have th1: "?rhs = (\<exists> (i::int). Ifm (real i#bs) (ferrack01 (simpfm (exsplit p))))" and qf':"qfree (ferrack01 (simpfm (exsplit p)))" by simp+
+ with DJcooper[OF qf'] show ?thesis by (simp add: mircfr_def)
+ qed
+qed
+
+lemma mirlfr: "\<forall> bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree(mirlfr p) \<and> Ifm bs (mirlfr p) = Ifm bs (E p)"
+proof(clarsimp simp del: Ifm.simps)
+ fix bs p
+ assume qf: "qfree p"
+ show "qfree (mirlfr p)\<and>(Ifm bs (mirlfr p) = Ifm bs (E p))" (is "_ \<and> (?lhs = ?rhs)")
+ proof-
+ let ?es = "(And (And (Ge (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (Lt (CN 0 1 (C (- 1))))) (simpfm (exsplit p)))"
+ have "?rhs = (\<exists> (i::int). \<exists> x. Ifm (x#real i#bs) ?es)"
+ using splitex[OF qf] by simp
+ with ferrack01[OF simpfm_qf[OF exsplit_qf[OF qf]]] have th1: "?rhs = (\<exists> (i::int). Ifm (real i#bs) (ferrack01 (simpfm (exsplit p))))" and qf':"qfree (ferrack01 (simpfm (exsplit p)))" by simp+
+ with DJredlove[OF qf'] show ?thesis by (simp add: mirlfr_def)
+ qed
+qed
+
+definition mircfrqe:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "mircfrqe p = qelim (prep p) mircfr"
+
+definition mirlfrqe:: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" where
+ "mirlfrqe p = qelim (prep p) mirlfr"
+
+theorem mircfrqe: "(Ifm bs (mircfrqe p) = Ifm bs p) \<and> qfree (mircfrqe p)"
+ using qelim_ci[OF mircfr] prep by (auto simp add: mircfrqe_def)
+
+theorem mirlfrqe: "(Ifm bs (mirlfrqe p) = Ifm bs p) \<and> qfree (mirlfrqe p)"
+ using qelim_ci[OF mirlfr] prep by (auto simp add: mirlfrqe_def)
+
+definition
+ "test1 (u\<Colon>unit) = mircfrqe (A (And (Le (Sub (Floor (Bound 0)) (Bound 0))) (Le (Add (Bound 0) (Floor (Neg (Bound 0)))))))"
+
+definition
+ "test2 (u\<Colon>unit) = mircfrqe (A (Iff (Eq (Add (Floor (Bound 0)) (Floor (Neg (Bound 0))))) (Eq (Sub (Floor (Bound 0)) (Bound 0)))))"
+
+definition
+ "test3 (u\<Colon>unit) = mirlfrqe (A (And (Le (Sub (Floor (Bound 0)) (Bound 0))) (Le (Add (Bound 0) (Floor (Neg (Bound 0)))))))"
+
+definition
+ "test4 (u\<Colon>unit) = mirlfrqe (A (Iff (Eq (Add (Floor (Bound 0)) (Floor (Neg (Bound 0))))) (Eq (Sub (Floor (Bound 0)) (Bound 0)))))"
+
+definition
+ "test5 (u\<Colon>unit) = mircfrqe (A(E(And (Ge(Sub (Bound 1) (Bound 0))) (Eq (Add (Floor (Bound 1)) (Floor (Neg(Bound 0))))))))"
+
+ML {* @{code test1} () *}
+ML {* @{code test2} () *}
+ML {* @{code test3} () *}
+ML {* @{code test4} () *}
+ML {* @{code test5} () *}
+
+(*export_code mircfrqe mirlfrqe
+ in SML module_name Mir file "raw_mir.ML"*)
+
+oracle mirfr_oracle = {* fn (proofs, ct) =>
+let
+
+fun num_of_term vs (t as Free (xn, xT)) = (case AList.lookup (op =) vs t
+ of NONE => error "Variable not found in the list!"
+ | SOME n => @{code Bound} n)
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "real (0::int)"} = @{code C} 0
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "real (1::int)"} = @{code C} 1
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "0::real"} = @{code C} 0
+ | num_of_term vs @{term "1::real"} = @{code C} 1
+ | num_of_term vs (Bound i) = @{code Bound} i
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "uminus :: real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t') = @{code Neg} (num_of_term vs t')
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op + :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Add} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op - :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "op * :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ (case (num_of_term vs t1)
+ of @{code C} i => @{code Mul} (i, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | _ => error "num_of_term: unsupported Multiplication")
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "number_of :: int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t')) =
+ @{code C} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t')
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "floor :: real \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t')) =
+ @{code Floor} (num_of_term vs t')
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "ceiling :: real \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t')) =
+ @{code Neg} (@{code Floor} (@{code Neg} (num_of_term vs t')))
+ | num_of_term vs (@{term "number_of :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ t') =
+ @{code C} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t')
+ | num_of_term vs t = error ("num_of_term: unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term @{context} t);
+
+fun fm_of_term vs @{term True} = @{code T}
+ | fm_of_term vs @{term False} = @{code F}
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op < :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Lt} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op \<le> :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Le} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op = :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Eq} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op rdvd"} $ (@{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "number_of :: int \<Rightarrow> int"} $ t1)) $ t2) =
+ @{code Dvd} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t1, num_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op = :: bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Iff} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op &"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code And} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op |"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Or} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "op -->"} $ t1 $ t2) =
+ @{code Imp} (fm_of_term vs t1, fm_of_term vs t2)
+ | fm_of_term vs (@{term "Not"} $ t') =
+ @{code NOT} (fm_of_term vs t')
+ | fm_of_term vs (Const ("Ex", _) $ Abs (xn, xT, p)) =
+ @{code E} (fm_of_term (map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs) p)
+ | fm_of_term vs (Const ("All", _) $ Abs (xn, xT, p)) =
+ @{code A} (fm_of_term (map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs) p)
+ | fm_of_term vs t = error ("fm_of_term : unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term @{context} t);
+
+fun term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) = @{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ HOLogic.mk_number HOLogic.intT i
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Bound} n) = fst (the (find_first (fn (_, m) => n = m) vs))
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Neg} (@{code Floor} (@{code Neg} t'))) =
+ @{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "ceiling :: real \<Rightarrow> int"} $ term_of_num vs t')
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Neg} t') = @{term "uminus :: real \<Rightarrow> real"} $ term_of_num vs t'
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op + :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $
+ term_of_num vs t1 $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Sub} (t1, t2)) = @{term "op - :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $
+ term_of_num vs t1 $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Mul} (i, t2)) = @{term "op * :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> real"} $
+ term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) $ term_of_num vs t2
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code Floor} t) = @{term "real :: int \<Rightarrow> real"} $ (@{term "floor :: real \<Rightarrow> int"} $ term_of_num vs t)
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code CN} (n, i, t)) = term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (@{code Mul} (i, @{code Bound} n), t))
+ | term_of_num vs (@{code CF} (c, t, s)) = term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (@{code Mul} (c, @{code Floor} t), s));
+
+fun term_of_fm vs @{code T} = HOLogic.true_const
+ | term_of_fm vs @{code F} = HOLogic.false_const
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Lt} t) =
+ @{term "op < :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::real"}
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Le} t) =
+ @{term "op \<le> :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::real"}
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Gt} t) =
+ @{term "op < :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ @{term "0::real"} $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Ge} t) =
+ @{term "op \<le> :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ @{term "0::real"} $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Eq} t) =
+ @{term "op = :: real \<Rightarrow> real \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_num vs t $ @{term "0::real"}
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code NEq} t) =
+ term_of_fm vs (@{code NOT} (@{code Eq} t))
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Dvd} (i, t)) =
+ @{term "op rdvd"} $ term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) $ term_of_num vs t
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code NDvd} (i, t)) =
+ term_of_fm vs (@{code NOT} (@{code Dvd} (i, t)))
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code NOT} t') =
+ HOLogic.Not $ term_of_fm vs t'
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code And} (t1, t2)) =
+ HOLogic.conj $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Or} (t1, t2)) =
+ HOLogic.disj $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Imp} (t1, t2)) =
+ HOLogic.imp $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2
+ | term_of_fm vs (@{code Iff} (t1, t2)) =
+ @{term "op = :: bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"} $ term_of_fm vs t1 $ term_of_fm vs t2;
+
+in
+ let
+ val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct;
+ val t = Thm.term_of ct;
+ val fs = OldTerm.term_frees t;
+ val vs = fs ~~ (0 upto (length fs - 1));
+ val qe = if proofs then @{code mirlfrqe} else @{code mircfrqe};
+ val t' = (term_of_fm vs o qe o fm_of_term vs) t;
+ in (cterm_of thy o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (t, t') end
+end;
+*}
+
+use "mir_tac.ML"
+setup "Mir_Tac.setup"
+
+lemma "ALL (x::real). (\<lfloor>x\<rfloor> = \<lceil>x\<rceil> = (x = real \<lfloor>x\<rfloor>))"
+apply mir
+done
+
+lemma "ALL (x::real). real (2::int)*x - (real (1::int)) < real \<lfloor>x\<rfloor> + real \<lceil>x\<rceil> \<and> real \<lfloor>x\<rfloor> + real \<lceil>x\<rceil> \<le> real (2::int)*x + (real (1::int))"
+apply mir
+done
+
+lemma "ALL (x::real). 2*\<lfloor>x\<rfloor> \<le> \<lfloor>2*x\<rfloor> \<and> \<lfloor>2*x\<rfloor> \<le> 2*\<lfloor>x+1\<rfloor>"
+apply mir
+done
+
+lemma "ALL (x::real). \<exists>y \<le> x. (\<lfloor>x\<rfloor> = \<lceil>y\<rceil>)"
+apply mir
+done
+
+lemma "ALL x y. \<lfloor>x\<rfloor> = \<lfloor>y\<rfloor> \<longrightarrow> 0 \<le> abs (y - x) \<and> abs (y - x) \<le> 1"
+apply mir
+done
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ROOT.ML Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+
+use_thy "Decision_Procs";
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/cooper_tac.ML Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/cooper_tac.ML
+ Author: Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
+*)
+
+structure Cooper_Tac =
+struct
+
+val trace = ref false;
+fun trace_msg s = if !trace then tracing s else ();
+
+val cooper_ss = @{simpset};
+
+val nT = HOLogic.natT;
+val binarith = @{thms normalize_bin_simps};
+val comp_arith = binarith @ simp_thms
+
+val zdvd_int = @{thm zdvd_int};
+val zdiff_int_split = @{thm zdiff_int_split};
+val all_nat = @{thm all_nat};
+val ex_nat = @{thm ex_nat};
+val number_of1 = @{thm number_of1};
+val number_of2 = @{thm number_of2};
+val split_zdiv = @{thm split_zdiv};
+val split_zmod = @{thm split_zmod};
+val mod_div_equality' = @{thm mod_div_equality'};
+val split_div' = @{thm split_div'};
+val Suc_plus1 = @{thm Suc_plus1};
+val imp_le_cong = @{thm imp_le_cong};
+val conj_le_cong = @{thm conj_le_cong};
+val nat_mod_add_eq = @{thm mod_add1_eq} RS sym;
+val nat_mod_add_left_eq = @{thm mod_add_left_eq} RS sym;
+val nat_mod_add_right_eq = @{thm mod_add_right_eq} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_eq = @{thm zmod_zadd1_eq} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_left_eq = @{thm zmod_zadd_left_eq} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_right_eq = @{thm zmod_zadd_right_eq} RS sym;
+val nat_div_add_eq = @{thm div_add1_eq} RS sym;
+val int_div_add_eq = @{thm zdiv_zadd1_eq} RS sym;
+
+fun prepare_for_linz q fm =
+ let
+ val ps = Logic.strip_params fm
+ val hs = map HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_hyp fm)
+ val c = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl fm)
+ fun mk_all ((s, T), (P,n)) =
+ if 0 mem loose_bnos P then
+ (HOLogic.all_const T $ Abs (s, T, P), n)
+ else (incr_boundvars ~1 P, n-1)
+ fun mk_all2 (v, t) = HOLogic.all_const (fastype_of v) $ lambda v t;
+ val rhs = hs
+ val np = length ps
+ val (fm',np) = foldr (fn ((x, T), (fm,n)) => mk_all ((x, T), (fm,n)))
+ (foldr HOLogic.mk_imp c rhs, np) ps
+ val (vs, _) = List.partition (fn t => q orelse (type_of t) = nT)
+ (OldTerm.term_frees fm' @ OldTerm.term_vars fm');
+ val fm2 = foldr mk_all2 fm' vs
+ in (fm2, np + length vs, length rhs) end;
+
+(*Object quantifier to meta --*)
+fun spec_step n th = if (n=0) then th else (spec_step (n-1) th) RS spec ;
+
+(* object implication to meta---*)
+fun mp_step n th = if (n=0) then th else (mp_step (n-1) th) RS mp;
+
+
+fun linz_tac ctxt q i = ObjectLogic.atomize_prems_tac i THEN (fn st =>
+ let
+ val g = List.nth (prems_of st, i - 1)
+ val thy = ProofContext.theory_of ctxt
+ (* Transform the term*)
+ val (t,np,nh) = prepare_for_linz q g
+ (* Some simpsets for dealing with mod div abs and nat*)
+ val mod_div_simpset = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [refl,nat_mod_add_eq, nat_mod_add_left_eq,
+ nat_mod_add_right_eq, int_mod_add_eq,
+ int_mod_add_right_eq, int_mod_add_left_eq,
+ nat_div_add_eq, int_div_add_eq,
+ @{thm mod_self}, @{thm "zmod_self"},
+ @{thm mod_by_0}, @{thm div_by_0},
+ @{thm "zdiv_zero"}, @{thm "zmod_zero"}, @{thm "div_0"}, @{thm "mod_0"},
+ @{thm "zdiv_1"}, @{thm "zmod_1"}, @{thm "div_1"}, @{thm "mod_1"},
+ Suc_plus1]
+ addsimps @{thms add_ac}
+ addsimprocs [cancel_div_mod_proc]
+ val simpset0 = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [mod_div_equality', Suc_plus1]
+ addsimps comp_arith
+ addsplits [split_zdiv, split_zmod, split_div', @{thm "split_min"}, @{thm "split_max"}]
+ (* Simp rules for changing (n::int) to int n *)
+ val simpset1 = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [nat_number_of_def, zdvd_int] @ map (fn r => r RS sym)
+ [@{thm int_int_eq}, @{thm zle_int}, @{thm zless_int}, @{thm zadd_int}, @{thm zmult_int}]
+ addsplits [zdiff_int_split]
+ (*simp rules for elimination of int n*)
+
+ val simpset2 = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [@{thm nat_0_le}, @{thm all_nat}, @{thm ex_nat}, @{thm number_of1}, @{thm number_of2}, @{thm int_0}, @{thm int_1}]
+ addcongs [@{thm conj_le_cong}, @{thm imp_le_cong}]
+ (* simp rules for elimination of abs *)
+ val simpset3 = HOL_basic_ss addsplits [@{thm abs_split}]
+ val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+ (* Theorem for the nat --> int transformation *)
+ val pre_thm = Seq.hd (EVERY
+ [simp_tac mod_div_simpset 1, simp_tac simpset0 1,
+ TRY (simp_tac simpset1 1), TRY (simp_tac simpset2 1),
+ TRY (simp_tac simpset3 1), TRY (simp_tac cooper_ss 1)]
+ (trivial ct))
+ fun assm_tac i = REPEAT_DETERM_N nh (assume_tac i)
+ (* The result of the quantifier elimination *)
+ val (th, tac) = case (prop_of pre_thm) of
+ Const ("==>", _) $ (Const ("Trueprop", _) $ t1) $ _ =>
+ let val pth = linzqe_oracle (cterm_of thy (Pattern.eta_long [] t1))
+ in
+ ((pth RS iffD2) RS pre_thm,
+ assm_tac (i + 1) THEN (if q then I else TRY) (rtac TrueI i))
+ end
+ | _ => (pre_thm, assm_tac i)
+ in (rtac (((mp_step nh) o (spec_step np)) th) i
+ THEN tac) st
+ end handle Subscript => no_tac st);
+
+fun linz_args meth =
+ let val parse_flag =
+ Args.$$$ "no_quantify" >> (K (K false));
+ in
+ Method.simple_args
+ (Scan.optional (Args.$$$ "(" |-- Scan.repeat1 parse_flag --| Args.$$$ ")") [] >>
+ curry (Library.foldl op |>) true)
+ (fn q => fn ctxt => meth ctxt q 1)
+ end;
+
+fun linz_method ctxt q i = Method.METHOD (fn facts =>
+ Method.insert_tac facts 1 THEN linz_tac ctxt q i);
+
+val setup =
+ Method.add_method ("cooper",
+ linz_args linz_method,
+ "decision procedure for linear integer arithmetic");
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrack_tac.ML Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/ferrack_tac.ML
+ Author: Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
+*)
+
+structure Ferrack_Tac =
+struct
+
+val trace = ref false;
+fun trace_msg s = if !trace then tracing s else ();
+
+val ferrack_ss = let val ths = [@{thm real_of_int_inject}, @{thm real_of_int_less_iff},
+ @{thm real_of_int_le_iff}]
+ in @{simpset} delsimps ths addsimps (map (fn th => th RS sym) ths)
+ end;
+
+val binarith =
+ @{thms normalize_bin_simps} @ @{thms pred_bin_simps} @ @{thms succ_bin_simps} @
+ @{thms add_bin_simps} @ @{thms minus_bin_simps} @ @{thms mult_bin_simps};
+val comp_arith = binarith @ simp_thms
+
+val zdvd_int = @{thm zdvd_int};
+val zdiff_int_split = @{thm zdiff_int_split};
+val all_nat = @{thm all_nat};
+val ex_nat = @{thm ex_nat};
+val number_of1 = @{thm number_of1};
+val number_of2 = @{thm number_of2};
+val split_zdiv = @{thm split_zdiv};
+val split_zmod = @{thm split_zmod};
+val mod_div_equality' = @{thm mod_div_equality'};
+val split_div' = @{thm split_div'};
+val Suc_plus1 = @{thm Suc_plus1};
+val imp_le_cong = @{thm imp_le_cong};
+val conj_le_cong = @{thm conj_le_cong};
+val nat_mod_add_eq = @{thm mod_add1_eq} RS sym;
+val nat_mod_add_left_eq = @{thm mod_add_left_eq} RS sym;
+val nat_mod_add_right_eq = @{thm mod_add_right_eq} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_eq = @{thm zmod_zadd1_eq} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_left_eq = @{thm zmod_zadd_left_eq} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_right_eq = @{thm zmod_zadd_right_eq} RS sym;
+val nat_div_add_eq = @{thm div_add1_eq} RS sym;
+val int_div_add_eq = @{thm zdiv_zadd1_eq} RS sym;
+val ZDIVISION_BY_ZERO_MOD = @{thm DIVISION_BY_ZERO} RS conjunct2;
+val ZDIVISION_BY_ZERO_DIV = @{thm DIVISION_BY_ZERO} RS conjunct1;
+
+fun prepare_for_linr sg q fm =
+ let
+ val ps = Logic.strip_params fm
+ val hs = map HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_hyp fm)
+ val c = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl fm)
+ fun mk_all ((s, T), (P,n)) =
+ if 0 mem loose_bnos P then
+ (HOLogic.all_const T $ Abs (s, T, P), n)
+ else (incr_boundvars ~1 P, n-1)
+ fun mk_all2 (v, t) = HOLogic.all_const (fastype_of v) $ lambda v t;
+ val rhs = hs
+(* val (rhs,irhs) = List.partition (relevant (rev ps)) hs *)
+ val np = length ps
+ val (fm',np) = foldr (fn ((x, T), (fm,n)) => mk_all ((x, T), (fm,n)))
+ (foldr HOLogic.mk_imp c rhs, np) ps
+ val (vs, _) = List.partition (fn t => q orelse (type_of t) = HOLogic.natT)
+ (OldTerm.term_frees fm' @ OldTerm.term_vars fm');
+ val fm2 = foldr mk_all2 fm' vs
+ in (fm2, np + length vs, length rhs) end;
+
+(*Object quantifier to meta --*)
+fun spec_step n th = if (n=0) then th else (spec_step (n-1) th) RS spec ;
+
+(* object implication to meta---*)
+fun mp_step n th = if (n=0) then th else (mp_step (n-1) th) RS mp;
+
+
+fun linr_tac ctxt q i =
+ (ObjectLogic.atomize_prems_tac i)
+ THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (split_tac [@{thm split_min}, @{thm split_max}, @{thm abs_split}] i))
+ THEN (fn st =>
+ let
+ val g = List.nth (prems_of st, i - 1)
+ val thy = ProofContext.theory_of ctxt
+ (* Transform the term*)
+ val (t,np,nh) = prepare_for_linr thy q g
+ (* Some simpsets for dealing with mod div abs and nat*)
+ val simpset0 = Simplifier.theory_context thy HOL_basic_ss addsimps comp_arith
+ val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+ (* Theorem for the nat --> int transformation *)
+ val pre_thm = Seq.hd (EVERY
+ [simp_tac simpset0 1,
+ TRY (simp_tac (Simplifier.theory_context thy ferrack_ss) 1)]
+ (trivial ct))
+ fun assm_tac i = REPEAT_DETERM_N nh (assume_tac i)
+ (* The result of the quantifier elimination *)
+ val (th, tac) = case (prop_of pre_thm) of
+ Const ("==>", _) $ (Const ("Trueprop", _) $ t1) $ _ =>
+ let val pth = linr_oracle (cterm_of thy (Pattern.eta_long [] t1))
+ in
+ (trace_msg ("calling procedure with term:\n" ^
+ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t1);
+ ((pth RS iffD2) RS pre_thm,
+ assm_tac (i + 1) THEN (if q then I else TRY) (rtac TrueI i)))
+ end
+ | _ => (pre_thm, assm_tac i)
+ in (rtac (((mp_step nh) o (spec_step np)) th) i
+ THEN tac) st
+ end handle Subscript => no_tac st);
+
+fun linr_meth src =
+ Method.syntax (Args.mode "no_quantify") src
+ #> (fn (q, ctxt) => Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' (linr_tac ctxt (not q)));
+
+val setup =
+ Method.add_method ("rferrack", linr_meth,
+ "decision procedure for linear real arithmetic");
+
+end
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/mir_tac.ML Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+(* Title: HOL/Reflection/mir_tac.ML
+ Author: Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
+*)
+
+structure Mir_Tac =
+struct
+
+val trace = ref false;
+fun trace_msg s = if !trace then tracing s else ();
+
+val mir_ss =
+let val ths = map thm ["real_of_int_inject", "real_of_int_less_iff", "real_of_int_le_iff"]
+in @{simpset} delsimps ths addsimps (map (fn th => th RS sym) ths)
+end;
+
+val nT = HOLogic.natT;
+ val nat_arith = map thm ["add_nat_number_of", "diff_nat_number_of",
+ "mult_nat_number_of", "eq_nat_number_of", "less_nat_number_of"];
+
+ val comp_arith = (map thm ["Let_def", "if_False", "if_True", "add_0",
+ "add_Suc", "add_number_of_left", "mult_number_of_left",
+ "Suc_eq_add_numeral_1"])@
+ (map (fn s => thm s RS sym) ["numeral_1_eq_1", "numeral_0_eq_0"])
+ @ @{thms arith_simps} @ nat_arith @ @{thms rel_simps}
+ val ths = [@{thm "mult_numeral_1"}, @{thm "mult_numeral_1_right"},
+ @{thm "real_of_nat_number_of"},
+ @{thm "real_of_nat_Suc"}, @{thm "real_of_nat_one"}, @{thm "real_of_one"},
+ @{thm "real_of_int_zero"}, @{thm "real_of_nat_zero"},
+ @{thm "Ring_and_Field.divide_zero"},
+ @{thm "divide_divide_eq_left"}, @{thm "times_divide_eq_right"},
+ @{thm "times_divide_eq_left"}, @{thm "divide_divide_eq_right"},
+ @{thm "diff_def"}, @{thm "minus_divide_left"}]
+val comp_ths = ths @ comp_arith @ simp_thms
+
+
+val zdvd_int = @{thm "zdvd_int"};
+val zdiff_int_split = @{thm "zdiff_int_split"};
+val all_nat = @{thm "all_nat"};
+val ex_nat = @{thm "ex_nat"};
+val number_of1 = @{thm "number_of1"};
+val number_of2 = @{thm "number_of2"};
+val split_zdiv = @{thm "split_zdiv"};
+val split_zmod = @{thm "split_zmod"};
+val mod_div_equality' = @{thm "mod_div_equality'"};
+val split_div' = @{thm "split_div'"};
+val Suc_plus1 = @{thm "Suc_plus1"};
+val imp_le_cong = @{thm "imp_le_cong"};
+val conj_le_cong = @{thm "conj_le_cong"};
+val nat_mod_add_eq = @{thm "mod_add1_eq"} RS sym;
+val nat_mod_add_left_eq = @{thm "mod_add_left_eq"} RS sym;
+val nat_mod_add_right_eq = @{thm "mod_add_right_eq"} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_eq = @{thm "zmod_zadd1_eq"} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_left_eq = @{thm "zmod_zadd_left_eq"} RS sym;
+val int_mod_add_right_eq = @{thm "zmod_zadd_right_eq"} RS sym;
+val nat_div_add_eq = @{thm "div_add1_eq"} RS sym;
+val int_div_add_eq = @{thm "zdiv_zadd1_eq"} RS sym;
+val ZDIVISION_BY_ZERO_MOD = @{thm "DIVISION_BY_ZERO"} RS conjunct2;
+val ZDIVISION_BY_ZERO_DIV = @{thm "DIVISION_BY_ZERO"} RS conjunct1;
+
+fun prepare_for_mir thy q fm =
+ let
+ val ps = Logic.strip_params fm
+ val hs = map HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_hyp fm)
+ val c = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl fm)
+ fun mk_all ((s, T), (P,n)) =
+ if 0 mem loose_bnos P then
+ (HOLogic.all_const T $ Abs (s, T, P), n)
+ else (incr_boundvars ~1 P, n-1)
+ fun mk_all2 (v, t) = HOLogic.all_const (fastype_of v) $ lambda v t;
+ val rhs = hs
+(* val (rhs,irhs) = List.partition (relevant (rev ps)) hs *)
+ val np = length ps
+ val (fm',np) = foldr (fn ((x, T), (fm,n)) => mk_all ((x, T), (fm,n)))
+ (foldr HOLogic.mk_imp c rhs, np) ps
+ val (vs, _) = List.partition (fn t => q orelse (type_of t) = nT)
+ (OldTerm.term_frees fm' @ OldTerm.term_vars fm');
+ val fm2 = foldr mk_all2 fm' vs
+ in (fm2, np + length vs, length rhs) end;
+
+(*Object quantifier to meta --*)
+fun spec_step n th = if (n=0) then th else (spec_step (n-1) th) RS spec ;
+
+(* object implication to meta---*)
+fun mp_step n th = if (n=0) then th else (mp_step (n-1) th) RS mp;
+
+
+fun mir_tac ctxt q i =
+ (ObjectLogic.atomize_prems_tac i)
+ THEN (simp_tac (HOL_basic_ss addsimps [@{thm "abs_ge_zero"}] addsimps simp_thms) i)
+ THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (split_tac [@{thm "split_min"}, @{thm "split_max"},@{thm "abs_split"}] i))
+ THEN (fn st =>
+ let
+ val g = List.nth (prems_of st, i - 1)
+ val thy = ProofContext.theory_of ctxt
+ (* Transform the term*)
+ val (t,np,nh) = prepare_for_mir thy q g
+ (* Some simpsets for dealing with mod div abs and nat*)
+ val mod_div_simpset = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [refl,nat_mod_add_eq,
+ @{thm "mod_self"}, @{thm "zmod_self"},
+ @{thm "zdiv_zero"},@{thm "zmod_zero"},@{thm "div_0"}, @{thm "mod_0"},
+ @{thm "zdiv_1"}, @{thm "zmod_1"}, @{thm "div_1"}, @{thm "mod_1"},
+ @{thm "Suc_plus1"}]
+ addsimps @{thms add_ac}
+ addsimprocs [cancel_div_mod_proc]
+ val simpset0 = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [mod_div_equality', Suc_plus1]
+ addsimps comp_ths
+ addsplits [@{thm "split_zdiv"}, @{thm "split_zmod"}, @{thm "split_div'"}, @{thm "split_min"}, @{thm "split_max"}]
+ (* Simp rules for changing (n::int) to int n *)
+ val simpset1 = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [@{thm "nat_number_of_def"}, @{thm "zdvd_int"}] @ map (fn r => r RS sym)
+ [@{thm "int_int_eq"}, @{thm "zle_int"}, @{thm "zless_int"}, @{thm "zadd_int"},
+ @{thm "zmult_int"}]
+ addsplits [@{thm "zdiff_int_split"}]
+ (*simp rules for elimination of int n*)
+
+ val simpset2 = HOL_basic_ss
+ addsimps [@{thm "nat_0_le"}, @{thm "all_nat"}, @{thm "ex_nat"}, @{thm "number_of1"},
+ @{thm "number_of2"}, @{thm "int_0"}, @{thm "int_1"}]
+ addcongs [@{thm "conj_le_cong"}, @{thm "imp_le_cong"}]
+ (* simp rules for elimination of abs *)
+ val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+ (* Theorem for the nat --> int transformation *)
+ val pre_thm = Seq.hd (EVERY
+ [simp_tac mod_div_simpset 1, simp_tac simpset0 1,
+ TRY (simp_tac simpset1 1), TRY (simp_tac simpset2 1), TRY (simp_tac mir_ss 1)]
+ (trivial ct))
+ fun assm_tac i = REPEAT_DETERM_N nh (assume_tac i)
+ (* The result of the quantifier elimination *)
+ val (th, tac) = case (prop_of pre_thm) of
+ Const ("==>", _) $ (Const ("Trueprop", _) $ t1) $ _ =>
+ let val pth =
+ (* If quick_and_dirty then run without proof generation as oracle*)
+ if !quick_and_dirty
+ then mirfr_oracle (false, cterm_of thy (Pattern.eta_long [] t1))
+ else mirfr_oracle (true, cterm_of thy (Pattern.eta_long [] t1))
+ in
+ (trace_msg ("calling procedure with term:\n" ^
+ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt t1);
+ ((pth RS iffD2) RS pre_thm,
+ assm_tac (i + 1) THEN (if q then I else TRY) (rtac TrueI i)))
+ end
+ | _ => (pre_thm, assm_tac i)
+ in (rtac (((mp_step nh) o (spec_step np)) th) i
+ THEN tac) st
+ end handle Subscript => no_tac st);
+
+fun mir_args meth =
+ let val parse_flag =
+ Args.$$$ "no_quantify" >> (K (K false));
+ in
+ Method.simple_args
+ (Scan.optional (Args.$$$ "(" |-- Scan.repeat1 parse_flag --| Args.$$$ ")") [] >>
+ curry (Library.foldl op |>) true)
+ (fn q => fn ctxt => meth ctxt q 1)
+ end;
+
+fun mir_method ctxt q i = Method.METHOD (fn facts =>
+ Method.insert_tac facts 1 THEN mir_tac ctxt q i);
+
+val setup =
+ Method.add_method ("mir",
+ mir_args mir_method,
+ "decision procedure for MIR arithmetic");
+
+
+end
--- a/src/HOL/Extraction/Pigeonhole.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Extraction/Pigeonhole.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
(* Title: HOL/Extraction/Pigeonhole.thy
- ID: $Id$
Author: Stefan Berghofer, TU Muenchen
*)
--- a/src/HOL/Extraction/Warshall.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Extraction/Warshall.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
(* Title: HOL/Extraction/Warshall.thy
- ID: $Id$
Author: Stefan Berghofer, TU Muenchen
*)
--- a/src/HOL/Imperative_HOL/Array.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Imperative_HOL/Array.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -32,15 +32,6 @@
else raise (''array lookup: index out of range''))
done)"
--- {* FIXME adjustion for List theory *}
-no_syntax
- nth :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a" (infixl "!" 100)
-
-abbreviation
- nth_list :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a" (infixl "!" 100)
-where
- "nth_list \<equiv> List.nth"
-
definition
upd :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<Colon>heap array \<Rightarrow> 'a\<Colon>heap array Heap"
where
--- a/src/HOL/Imperative_HOL/Imperative_HOL.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Imperative_HOL/Imperative_HOL.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-(* Title: HOL/Library/Imperative_HOL.thy
- ID: $Id$
+(* Title: HOL/Imperative_HOL/Imperative_HOL.thy
Author: John Matthews, Galois Connections; Alexander Krauss, Lukas Bulwahn & Florian Haftmann, TU Muenchen
*)
--- a/src/HOL/IsaMakefile Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/IsaMakefile Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
HOL-Auth \
HOL-AxClasses \
HOL-Bali \
+ HOL-Decision_Procs \
HOL-Extraction \
HOL-HahnBanach \
HOL-Hoare \
@@ -36,7 +37,6 @@
HOL-Nominal-Examples \
HOL-NumberTheory \
HOL-Prolog \
- HOL-Reflection \
HOL-SET-Protocol \
HOL-SizeChange \
HOL-Statespace \
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@
Library/Abstract_Rat.thy \
Library/BigO.thy Library/ContNotDenum.thy Library/Efficient_Nat.thy \
Library/Executable_Set.thy Library/Infinite_Set.thy \
- Library/FuncSet.thy Library/Dense_Linear_Order.thy \
+ Library/FuncSet.thy \
Library/Library.thy Library/List_Prefix.thy Library/State_Monad.thy \
Library/Multiset.thy Library/Permutation.thy \
Library/Primes.thy Library/Pocklington.thy Library/Quotient.thy \
@@ -658,6 +658,24 @@
@$(ISABELLE_TOOL) usedir $(OUT)/HOL SizeChange
+## HOL-Decision_Procs
+
+HOL-Decision_Procs: HOL $(LOG)/HOL-Decision_Procs.gz
+
+$(LOG)/HOL-Decision_Procs.gz: $(OUT)/HOL \
+ Decision_Procs/Approximation.thy \
+ Decision_Procs/Cooper.thy \
+ Decision_Procs/cooper_tac.ML \
+ Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order.thy \
+ Decision_Procs/Ferrack.thy \
+ Decision_Procs/ferrack_tac.ML \
+ Decision_Procs/MIR.thy \
+ Decision_Procs/mir_tac.ML \
+ Decision_Procs/Decision_Procs.thy \
+ Decision_Procs/ROOT.ML
+ @$(ISABELLE_TOOL) usedir $(OUT)/HOL Decision_Procs
+
+
## HOL-Lambda
HOL-Lambda: HOL $(LOG)/HOL-Lambda.gz
@@ -680,22 +698,6 @@
@$(ISABELLE_TOOL) usedir $(OUT)/HOL Prolog
-## HOL-Reflection
-
-HOL-Reflection: HOL $(LOG)/HOL-Reflection.gz
-
-$(LOG)/HOL-Reflection.gz: $(OUT)/HOL \
- Reflection/Approximation.thy \
- Reflection/Cooper.thy \
- Reflection/cooper_tac.ML \
- Reflection/Ferrack.thy \
- Reflection/ferrack_tac.ML \
- Reflection/MIR.thy \
- Reflection/mir_tac.ML \
- Reflection/ROOT.ML
- @$(ISABELLE_TOOL) usedir $(OUT)/HOL Reflection
-
-
## HOL-W0
HOL-W0: HOL $(LOG)/HOL-W0.gz
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Code_Index.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Code_Index.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@
(Haskell infixl 7 "*")
code_const div_mod_index
- (SML "(fn n => fn m =>/ (n div m, n mod m))")
- (OCaml "(fun n -> fun m ->/ (n '/ m, n mod m))")
+ (SML "(fn n => fn m =>/ if m = 0/ then (0, n) else/ (n div m, n mod m))")
+ (OCaml "(fun n -> fun m ->/ if m = 0/ then (0, n) else/ (n '/ m, n mod m))")
(Haskell "divMod")
code_const "eq_class.eq \<Colon> index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> bool"
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Dense_Linear_Order.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,879 +0,0 @@
-(* Title : HOL/Dense_Linear_Order.thy
- Author : Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
-*)
-
-header {* Dense linear order without endpoints
- and a quantifier elimination procedure in Ferrante and Rackoff style *}
-
-theory Dense_Linear_Order
-imports Plain Groebner_Basis Main
-uses
- "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/langford_data.ML"
- "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/ferrante_rackoff_data.ML"
- ("~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/langford.ML")
- ("~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/ferrante_rackoff.ML")
-begin
-
-setup {* Langford_Data.setup #> Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.setup *}
-
-context linorder
-begin
-
-lemma less_not_permute[noatp]: "\<not> (x < y \<and> y < x)" by (simp add: not_less linear)
-
-lemma gather_simps[noatp]:
- shows
- "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> x < u \<and> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> (insert u U). x < y) \<and> P x)"
- and "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> l < x \<and> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> (insert l L). y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> P x)"
- "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> x < u) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> (insert u U). x < y))"
- and "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y) \<and> l < x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> (insert l L). y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y))" by auto
-
-lemma
- gather_start[noatp]: "(\<exists>x. P x) \<equiv> (\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> {}. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in> {}. x < y) \<and> P x)"
- by simp
-
-text{* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>-\<infinity>\<^esub>)"}*}
-lemma minf_lt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x < t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
-lemma minf_gt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (t < x \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
- by (simp add: not_less) (rule exI[where x="t"], auto simp add: less_le)
-
-lemma minf_le[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by (auto simp add: less_le)
-lemma minf_ge[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (t \<le> x \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
- by (auto simp add: less_le not_less not_le)
-lemma minf_eq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x = t \<longleftrightarrow> False)" by auto
-lemma minf_neq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
-lemma minf_P[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P \<longleftrightarrow> P)" by blast
-
-text{* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>+\<infinity>\<^esub>)"}*}
-lemma pinf_gt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (t < x \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
-lemma pinf_lt[noatp]: "\<exists>z . \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x < t \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
- by (simp add: not_less) (rule exI[where x="t"], auto simp add: less_le)
-
-lemma pinf_ge[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (t \<le> x \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by (auto simp add: less_le)
-lemma pinf_le[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t \<longleftrightarrow> False)"
- by (auto simp add: less_le not_less not_le)
-lemma pinf_eq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x = t \<longleftrightarrow> False)" by auto
-lemma pinf_neq[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t \<longleftrightarrow> True)" by auto
-lemma pinf_P[noatp]: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z < x \<longrightarrow> (P \<longleftrightarrow> P)" by blast
-
-lemma nmi_lt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x < t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_gt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> t < x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)"
- by (auto simp add: le_less)
-lemma nmi_le[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x\<le> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_ge[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> t\<le> x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_eq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x = t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_neq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow>\<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x \<noteq> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_P[noatp]: "\<forall> x. ~P \<and> P \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_conj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x) ;
- \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
- \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<and> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-lemma nmi_disj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x) ;
- \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
- \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<or> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x)" by auto
-
-lemma npi_lt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x < t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by (auto simp add: le_less)
-lemma npi_gt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> t < x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-lemma npi_le[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x \<le> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-lemma npi_ge[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> t \<le> x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-lemma npi_eq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>False \<and> x = t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-lemma npi_neq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>True \<and> x \<noteq> t \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u )" by auto
-lemma npi_P[noatp]: "\<forall> x. ~P \<and> P \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-lemma npi_conj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u) ; \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)\<rbrakk>
- \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<and> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-lemma npi_disj[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not>P1' \<and> P1 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u) ; \<forall>x. \<not>P2' \<and> P2 x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)\<rbrakk>
- \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not>(P1' \<or> P2') \<and> (P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)" by auto
-
-lemma lin_dense_lt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x < t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y < t)"
-proof(clarsimp)
- fix x l u y assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x"
- and xu: "x<u" and px: "x < t" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
- from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
- {assume H: "t < y"
- from less_trans[OF lx px] less_trans[OF H yu]
- have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
- with tU noU have "False" by auto}
- hence "\<not> t < y" by auto hence "y \<le> t" by (simp add: not_less)
- thus "y < t" using tny by (simp add: less_le)
-qed
-
-lemma lin_dense_gt[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l < x \<and> x < u \<and> t < x \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> t < y)"
-proof(clarsimp)
- fix x l u y
- assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x" and xu: "x<u"
- and px: "t < x" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
- from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
- {assume H: "y< t"
- from less_trans[OF ly H] less_trans[OF px xu] have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
- with tU noU have "False" by auto}
- hence "\<not> y<t" by auto hence "t \<le> y" by (auto simp add: not_less)
- thus "t < y" using tny by (simp add:less_le)
-qed
-
-lemma lin_dense_le[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x \<le> t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y\<le> t)"
-proof(clarsimp)
- fix x l u y
- assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x" and xu: "x<u"
- and px: "x \<le> t" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
- from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
- {assume H: "t < y"
- from less_le_trans[OF lx px] less_trans[OF H yu]
- have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
- with tU noU have "False" by auto}
- hence "\<not> t < y" by auto thus "y \<le> t" by (simp add: not_less)
-qed
-
-lemma lin_dense_ge[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> t \<le> x \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> t \<le> y)"
-proof(clarsimp)
- fix x l u y
- assume tU: "t \<in> U" and noU: "\<forall>t. l < t \<and> t < u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U" and lx: "l < x" and xu: "x<u"
- and px: "t \<le> x" and ly: "l<y" and yu:"y < u"
- from tU noU ly yu have tny: "t\<noteq>y" by auto
- {assume H: "y< t"
- from less_trans[OF ly H] le_less_trans[OF px xu]
- have "l < t \<and> t < u" by simp
- with tU noU have "False" by auto}
- hence "\<not> y<t" by auto thus "t \<le> y" by (simp add: not_less)
-qed
-lemma lin_dense_eq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x = t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y= t)" by auto
-lemma lin_dense_neq[noatp]: "t \<in> U \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> x \<noteq> t \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> y\<noteq> t)" by auto
-lemma lin_dense_P[noatp]: "\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P)" by auto
-
-lemma lin_dense_conj[noatp]:
- "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P1 x
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P1 y) ;
- \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P2 x
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P2 y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
- \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> (P1 x \<and> P2 x)
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> (P1 y \<and> P2 y))"
- by blast
-lemma lin_dense_disj[noatp]:
- "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P1 x
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P1 y) ;
- \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> P2 x
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> P2 y)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>
- \<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l < t \<and> t< u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l< x \<and> x < u \<and> (P1 x \<or> P2 x)
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l < y \<and> y < u \<longrightarrow> (P1 y \<or> P2 y))"
- by blast
-
-lemma npmibnd[noatp]: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<le> x); \<forall>x. \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<le> u)\<rbrakk>
- \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<le> x \<and> x \<le> u')"
-by auto
-
-lemma finite_set_intervals[noatp]:
- assumes px: "P x" and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u" and linS: "l\<in> S"
- and uinS: "u \<in> S" and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
- shows "\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x"
-proof-
- let ?Mx = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> y \<le> x}"
- let ?xM = "{y. y\<in> S \<and> x \<le> y}"
- let ?a = "Max ?Mx"
- let ?b = "Min ?xM"
- have MxS: "?Mx \<subseteq> S" by blast
- hence fMx: "finite ?Mx" using fS finite_subset by auto
- from lx linS have linMx: "l \<in> ?Mx" by blast
- hence Mxne: "?Mx \<noteq> {}" by blast
- have xMS: "?xM \<subseteq> S" by blast
- hence fxM: "finite ?xM" using fS finite_subset by auto
- from xu uinS have linxM: "u \<in> ?xM" by blast
- hence xMne: "?xM \<noteq> {}" by blast
- have ax:"?a \<le> x" using Mxne fMx by auto
- have xb:"x \<le> ?b" using xMne fxM by auto
- have "?a \<in> ?Mx" using Max_in[OF fMx Mxne] by simp hence ainS: "?a \<in> S" using MxS by blast
- have "?b \<in> ?xM" using Min_in[OF fxM xMne] by simp hence binS: "?b \<in> S" using xMS by blast
- have noy:"\<forall> y. ?a < y \<and> y < ?b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S"
- proof(clarsimp)
- fix y assume ay: "?a < y" and yb: "y < ?b" and yS: "y \<in> S"
- from yS have "y\<in> ?Mx \<or> y\<in> ?xM" by (auto simp add: linear)
- moreover {assume "y \<in> ?Mx" hence "y \<le> ?a" using Mxne fMx by auto with ay have "False" by (simp add: not_le[symmetric])}
- moreover {assume "y \<in> ?xM" hence "?b \<le> y" using xMne fxM by auto with yb have "False" by (simp add: not_le[symmetric])}
- ultimately show "False" by blast
- qed
- from ainS binS noy ax xb px show ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-lemma finite_set_intervals2[noatp]:
- assumes px: "P x" and lx: "l \<le> x" and xu: "x \<le> u" and linS: "l\<in> S"
- and uinS: "u \<in> S" and fS:"finite S" and lS: "\<forall> x\<in> S. l \<le> x" and Su: "\<forall> x\<in> S. x \<le> u"
- shows "(\<exists> s\<in> S. P s) \<or> (\<exists> a \<in> S. \<exists> b \<in> S. (\<forall> y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S) \<and> a < x \<and> x < b \<and> P x)"
-proof-
- from finite_set_intervals[where P="P", OF px lx xu linS uinS fS lS Su]
- obtain a and b where
- as: "a\<in> S" and bs: "b\<in> S" and noS:"\<forall>y. a < y \<and> y < b \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> S"
- and axb: "a \<le> x \<and> x \<le> b \<and> P x" by auto
- from axb have "x= a \<or> x= b \<or> (a < x \<and> x < b)" by (auto simp add: le_less)
- thus ?thesis using px as bs noS by blast
-qed
-
-end
-
-section {* The classical QE after Langford for dense linear orders *}
-
-context dense_linear_order
-begin
-
-lemma interval_empty_iff:
- "{y. x < y \<and> y < z} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> x < z"
- by (auto dest: dense)
-
-lemma dlo_qe_bnds[noatp]:
- assumes ne: "L \<noteq> {}" and neU: "U \<noteq> {}" and fL: "finite L" and fU: "finite U"
- shows "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y)) \<equiv> (\<forall> l \<in> L. \<forall>u \<in> U. l < u)"
-proof (simp only: atomize_eq, rule iffI)
- assume H: "\<exists>x. (\<forall>y\<in>L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>U. x < y)"
- then obtain x where xL: "\<forall>y\<in>L. y < x" and xU: "\<forall>y\<in>U. x < y" by blast
- {fix l u assume l: "l \<in> L" and u: "u \<in> U"
- have "l < x" using xL l by blast
- also have "x < u" using xU u by blast
- finally (less_trans) have "l < u" .}
- thus "\<forall>l\<in>L. \<forall>u\<in>U. l < u" by blast
-next
- assume H: "\<forall>l\<in>L. \<forall>u\<in>U. l < u"
- let ?ML = "Max L"
- let ?MU = "Min U"
- from fL ne have th1: "?ML \<in> L" and th1': "\<forall>l\<in>L. l \<le> ?ML" by auto
- from fU neU have th2: "?MU \<in> U" and th2': "\<forall>u\<in>U. ?MU \<le> u" by auto
- from th1 th2 H have "?ML < ?MU" by auto
- with dense obtain w where th3: "?ML < w" and th4: "w < ?MU" by blast
- from th3 th1' have "\<forall>l \<in> L. l < w" by auto
- moreover from th4 th2' have "\<forall>u \<in> U. w < u" by auto
- ultimately show "\<exists>x. (\<forall>y\<in>L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y\<in>U. x < y)" by auto
-qed
-
-lemma dlo_qe_noub[noatp]:
- assumes ne: "L \<noteq> {}" and fL: "finite L"
- shows "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> L. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> {}. x < y)) \<equiv> True"
-proof(simp add: atomize_eq)
- from gt_ex[of "Max L"] obtain M where M: "Max L < M" by blast
- from ne fL have "\<forall>x \<in> L. x \<le> Max L" by simp
- with M have "\<forall>x\<in>L. x < M" by (auto intro: le_less_trans)
- thus "\<exists>x. \<forall>y\<in>L. y < x" by blast
-qed
-
-lemma dlo_qe_nolb[noatp]:
- assumes ne: "U \<noteq> {}" and fU: "finite U"
- shows "(\<exists>x. (\<forall>y \<in> {}. y < x) \<and> (\<forall>y \<in> U. x < y)) \<equiv> True"
-proof(simp add: atomize_eq)
- from lt_ex[of "Min U"] obtain M where M: "M < Min U" by blast
- from ne fU have "\<forall>x \<in> U. Min U \<le> x" by simp
- with M have "\<forall>x\<in>U. M < x" by (auto intro: less_le_trans)
- thus "\<exists>x. \<forall>y\<in>U. x < y" by blast
-qed
-
-lemma exists_neq[noatp]: "\<exists>(x::'a). x \<noteq> t" "\<exists>(x::'a). t \<noteq> x"
- using gt_ex[of t] by auto
-
-lemmas dlo_simps[noatp] = order_refl less_irrefl not_less not_le exists_neq
- le_less neq_iff linear less_not_permute
-
-lemma axiom[noatp]: "dense_linear_order (op \<le>) (op <)" by (rule dense_linear_order_axioms)
-lemma atoms[noatp]:
- shows "TERM (less :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
- and "TERM (less_eq :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
- and "TERM (op = :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)" .
-
-declare axiom[langford qe: dlo_qe_bnds dlo_qe_nolb dlo_qe_noub gather: gather_start gather_simps atoms: atoms]
-declare dlo_simps[langfordsimp]
-
-end
-
-(* FIXME: Move to HOL -- together with the conj_aci_rule in langford.ML *)
-lemma dnf[noatp]:
- "(P & (Q | R)) = ((P&Q) | (P&R))"
- "((Q | R) & P) = ((Q&P) | (R&P))"
- by blast+
-
-lemmas weak_dnf_simps[noatp] = simp_thms dnf
-
-lemma nnf_simps[noatp]:
- "(\<not>(P \<and> Q)) = (\<not>P \<or> \<not>Q)" "(\<not>(P \<or> Q)) = (\<not>P \<and> \<not>Q)" "(P \<longrightarrow> Q) = (\<not>P \<or> Q)"
- "(P = Q) = ((P \<and> Q) \<or> (\<not>P \<and> \<not> Q))" "(\<not> \<not>(P)) = P"
- by blast+
-
-lemma ex_distrib[noatp]: "(\<exists>x. P x \<or> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> ((\<exists>x. P x) \<or> (\<exists>x. Q x))" by blast
-
-lemmas dnf_simps[noatp] = weak_dnf_simps nnf_simps ex_distrib
-
-use "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/langford.ML"
-method_setup dlo = {*
- Method.ctxt_args (Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' o LangfordQE.dlo_tac)
-*} "Langford's algorithm for quantifier elimination in dense linear orders"
-
-
-section {* Contructive dense linear orders yield QE for linear arithmetic over ordered Fields -- see @{text "Arith_Tools.thy"} *}
-
-text {* Linear order without upper bounds *}
-
-locale linorder_stupid_syntax = linorder
-begin
-notation
- less_eq ("op \<sqsubseteq>") and
- less_eq ("(_/ \<sqsubseteq> _)" [51, 51] 50) and
- less ("op \<sqsubset>") and
- less ("(_/ \<sqsubset> _)" [51, 51] 50)
-
-end
-
-locale linorder_no_ub = linorder_stupid_syntax +
- assumes gt_ex: "\<exists>y. less x y"
-begin
-lemma ge_ex[noatp]: "\<exists>y. x \<sqsubseteq> y" using gt_ex by auto
-
-text {* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>+\<infinity>\<^esub>)"} *}
-lemma pinf_conj[noatp]:
- assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
- and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
- shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2'))"
-proof-
- from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
- and z2: "\<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
- from gt_ex obtain z where z:"ord.max less_eq z1 z2 \<sqsubset> z" by blast
- from z have zz1: "z1 \<sqsubset> z" and zz2: "z2 \<sqsubset> z" by simp_all
- {fix x assume H: "z \<sqsubset> x"
- from less_trans[OF zz1 H] less_trans[OF zz2 H]
- have "(P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
- }
- thus ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-lemma pinf_disj[noatp]:
- assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
- and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
- shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2'))"
-proof-
- from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. z1 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
- and z2: "\<forall>x. z2 \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
- from gt_ex obtain z where z:"ord.max less_eq z1 z2 \<sqsubset> z" by blast
- from z have zz1: "z1 \<sqsubset> z" and zz2: "z2 \<sqsubset> z" by simp_all
- {fix x assume H: "z \<sqsubset> x"
- from less_trans[OF zz1 H] less_trans[OF zz2 H]
- have "(P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
- }
- thus ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-lemma pinf_ex[noatp]: assumes ex:"\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" and p1: P1 shows "\<exists> x. P x"
-proof-
- from ex obtain z where z: "\<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" by blast
- from gt_ex obtain x where x: "z \<sqsubset> x" by blast
- from z x p1 show ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-end
-
-text {* Linear order without upper bounds *}
-
-locale linorder_no_lb = linorder_stupid_syntax +
- assumes lt_ex: "\<exists>y. less y x"
-begin
-lemma le_ex[noatp]: "\<exists>y. y \<sqsubseteq> x" using lt_ex by auto
-
-
-text {* Theorems for @{text "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P\<^bsub>-\<infinity>\<^esub>)"} *}
-lemma minf_conj[noatp]:
- assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
- and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
- shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2'))"
-proof-
- from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"and z2: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
- from lt_ex obtain z where z:"z \<sqsubset> ord.min less_eq z1 z2" by blast
- from z have zz1: "z \<sqsubset> z1" and zz2: "z \<sqsubset> z2" by simp_all
- {fix x assume H: "x \<sqsubset> z"
- from less_trans[OF H zz1] less_trans[OF H zz2]
- have "(P1 x \<and> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<and> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
- }
- thus ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-lemma minf_disj[noatp]:
- assumes ex1: "\<exists>z1. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"
- and ex2: "\<exists>z2. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')"
- shows "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> ((P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2'))"
-proof-
- from ex1 ex2 obtain z1 and z2 where z1: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z1 \<longrightarrow> (P1 x \<longleftrightarrow> P1')"and z2: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z2 \<longrightarrow> (P2 x \<longleftrightarrow> P2')" by blast
- from lt_ex obtain z where z:"z \<sqsubset> ord.min less_eq z1 z2" by blast
- from z have zz1: "z \<sqsubset> z1" and zz2: "z \<sqsubset> z2" by simp_all
- {fix x assume H: "x \<sqsubset> z"
- from less_trans[OF H zz1] less_trans[OF H zz2]
- have "(P1 x \<or> P2 x) \<longleftrightarrow> (P1' \<or> P2')" using z1 zz1 z2 zz2 by auto
- }
- thus ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-lemma minf_ex[noatp]: assumes ex:"\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" and p1: P1 shows "\<exists> x. P x"
-proof-
- from ex obtain z where z: "\<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x \<longleftrightarrow> P1)" by blast
- from lt_ex obtain x where x: "x \<sqsubset> z" by blast
- from z x p1 show ?thesis by blast
-qed
-
-end
-
-
-locale constr_dense_linear_order = linorder_no_lb + linorder_no_ub +
- fixes between
- assumes between_less: "less x y \<Longrightarrow> less x (between x y) \<and> less (between x y) y"
- and between_same: "between x x = x"
-
-sublocale constr_dense_linear_order < dense_linear_order
- apply unfold_locales
- using gt_ex lt_ex between_less
- by (auto, rule_tac x="between x y" in exI, simp)
-
-context constr_dense_linear_order
-begin
-
-lemma rinf_U[noatp]:
- assumes fU: "finite U"
- and lin_dense: "\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l \<sqsubset> t \<and> t\<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l\<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> u \<and> P x
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> P y )"
- and nmpiU: "\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x \<and> x \<sqsubseteq> u')"
- and nmi: "\<not> MP" and npi: "\<not> PP" and ex: "\<exists> x. P x"
- shows "\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. P (between u u')"
-proof-
- from ex obtain x where px: "P x" by blast
- from px nmi npi nmpiU have "\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x \<and> x \<sqsubseteq> u'" by auto
- then obtain u and u' where uU:"u\<in> U" and uU': "u' \<in> U" and ux:"u \<sqsubseteq> x" and xu':"x \<sqsubseteq> u'" by auto
- from uU have Une: "U \<noteq> {}" by auto
- term "linorder.Min less_eq"
- let ?l = "linorder.Min less_eq U"
- let ?u = "linorder.Max less_eq U"
- have linM: "?l \<in> U" using fU Une by simp
- have uinM: "?u \<in> U" using fU Une by simp
- have lM: "\<forall> t\<in> U. ?l \<sqsubseteq> t" using Une fU by auto
- have Mu: "\<forall> t\<in> U. t \<sqsubseteq> ?u" using Une fU by auto
- have th:"?l \<sqsubseteq> u" using uU Une lM by auto
- from order_trans[OF th ux] have lx: "?l \<sqsubseteq> x" .
- have th: "u' \<sqsubseteq> ?u" using uU' Une Mu by simp
- from order_trans[OF xu' th] have xu: "x \<sqsubseteq> ?u" .
- from finite_set_intervals2[where P="P",OF px lx xu linM uinM fU lM Mu]
- have "(\<exists> s\<in> U. P s) \<or>
- (\<exists> t1\<in> U. \<exists> t2 \<in> U. (\<forall> y. t1 \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> U) \<and> t1 \<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> t2 \<and> P x)" .
- moreover { fix u assume um: "u\<in>U" and pu: "P u"
- have "between u u = u" by (simp add: between_same)
- with um pu have "P (between u u)" by simp
- with um have ?thesis by blast}
- moreover{
- assume "\<exists> t1\<in> U. \<exists> t2 \<in> U. (\<forall> y. t1 \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> U) \<and> t1 \<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> t2 \<and> P x"
- then obtain t1 and t2 where t1M: "t1 \<in> U" and t2M: "t2\<in> U"
- and noM: "\<forall> y. t1 \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> t2 \<longrightarrow> y \<notin> U" and t1x: "t1 \<sqsubset> x" and xt2: "x \<sqsubset> t2" and px: "P x"
- by blast
- from less_trans[OF t1x xt2] have t1t2: "t1 \<sqsubset> t2" .
- let ?u = "between t1 t2"
- from between_less t1t2 have t1lu: "t1 \<sqsubset> ?u" and ut2: "?u \<sqsubset> t2" by auto
- from lin_dense noM t1x xt2 px t1lu ut2 have "P ?u" by blast
- with t1M t2M have ?thesis by blast}
- ultimately show ?thesis by blast
- qed
-
-theorem fr_eq[noatp]:
- assumes fU: "finite U"
- and lin_dense: "\<forall>x l u. (\<forall> t. l \<sqsubset> t \<and> t\<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> t \<notin> U) \<and> l\<sqsubset> x \<and> x \<sqsubset> u \<and> P x
- \<longrightarrow> (\<forall> y. l \<sqsubset> y \<and> y \<sqsubset> u \<longrightarrow> P y )"
- and nmibnd: "\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x)"
- and npibnd: "\<forall>x. \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. x \<sqsubseteq> u)"
- and mi: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x \<sqsubset> z \<longrightarrow> (P x = MP)" and pi: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. z \<sqsubset> x \<longrightarrow> (P x = PP)"
- shows "(\<exists> x. P x) \<equiv> (MP \<or> PP \<or> (\<exists> u \<in> U. \<exists> u'\<in> U. P (between u u')))"
- (is "_ \<equiv> (_ \<or> _ \<or> ?F)" is "?E \<equiv> ?D")
-proof-
- {
- assume px: "\<exists> x. P x"
- have "MP \<or> PP \<or> (\<not> MP \<and> \<not> PP)" by blast
- moreover {assume "MP \<or> PP" hence "?D" by blast}
- moreover {assume nmi: "\<not> MP" and npi: "\<not> PP"
- from npmibnd[OF nmibnd npibnd]
- have nmpiU: "\<forall>x. \<not> MP \<and> \<not>PP \<and> P x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> u\<in> U. \<exists> u' \<in> U. u \<sqsubseteq> x \<and> x \<sqsubseteq> u')" .
- from rinf_U[OF fU lin_dense nmpiU nmi npi px] have "?D" by blast}
- ultimately have "?D" by blast}
- moreover
- { assume "?D"
- moreover {assume m:"MP" from minf_ex[OF mi m] have "?E" .}
- moreover {assume p: "PP" from pinf_ex[OF pi p] have "?E" . }
- moreover {assume f:"?F" hence "?E" by blast}
- ultimately have "?E" by blast}
- ultimately have "?E = ?D" by blast thus "?E \<equiv> ?D" by simp
-qed
-
-lemmas minf_thms[noatp] = minf_conj minf_disj minf_eq minf_neq minf_lt minf_le minf_gt minf_ge minf_P
-lemmas pinf_thms[noatp] = pinf_conj pinf_disj pinf_eq pinf_neq pinf_lt pinf_le pinf_gt pinf_ge pinf_P
-
-lemmas nmi_thms[noatp] = nmi_conj nmi_disj nmi_eq nmi_neq nmi_lt nmi_le nmi_gt nmi_ge nmi_P
-lemmas npi_thms[noatp] = npi_conj npi_disj npi_eq npi_neq npi_lt npi_le npi_gt npi_ge npi_P
-lemmas lin_dense_thms[noatp] = lin_dense_conj lin_dense_disj lin_dense_eq lin_dense_neq lin_dense_lt lin_dense_le lin_dense_gt lin_dense_ge lin_dense_P
-
-lemma ferrack_axiom[noatp]: "constr_dense_linear_order less_eq less between"
- by (rule constr_dense_linear_order_axioms)
-lemma atoms[noatp]:
- shows "TERM (less :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
- and "TERM (less_eq :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)"
- and "TERM (op = :: 'a \<Rightarrow> _)" .
-
-declare ferrack_axiom [ferrack minf: minf_thms pinf: pinf_thms
- nmi: nmi_thms npi: npi_thms lindense:
- lin_dense_thms qe: fr_eq atoms: atoms]
-
-declaration {*
-let
-fun simps phi = map (Morphism.thm phi) [@{thm "not_less"}, @{thm "not_le"}]
-fun generic_whatis phi =
- let
- val [lt, le] = map (Morphism.term phi) [@{term "op \<sqsubset>"}, @{term "op \<sqsubseteq>"}]
- fun h x t =
- case term_of t of
- Const("op =", _)$y$z => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | @{term "Not"}$(Const("op =", _)$y$z) => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | b$y$z => if Term.could_unify (b, lt) then
- if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
- else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- else if Term.could_unify (b, le) then
- if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
- else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | _ => Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- in h end
- fun ss phi = HOL_ss addsimps (simps phi)
-in
- Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.funs @{thm "ferrack_axiom"}
- {isolate_conv = K (K (K Thm.reflexive)), whatis = generic_whatis, simpset = ss}
-end
-*}
-
-end
-
-use "~~/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/ferrante_rackoff.ML"
-
-method_setup ferrack = {*
- Method.ctxt_args (Method.SIMPLE_METHOD' o FerranteRackoff.dlo_tac)
-*} "Ferrante and Rackoff's algorithm for quantifier elimination in dense linear orders"
-
-subsection {* Ferrante and Rackoff algorithm over ordered fields *}
-
-lemma neg_prod_lt:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x < 0) == (x > 0))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c < 0"
- have "c*x < 0 = (0/c < x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_less_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = (0 < x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x < 0) == (x > 0)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma pos_prod_lt:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x < 0) == (x < 0))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c > 0"
- hence "c*x < 0 = (0/c > x)" by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = (0 > x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x < 0) == (x < 0)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma neg_prod_sum_lt: "(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t< 0) == (x > (- 1/c)*t))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c < 0"
- have "c*x + t< 0 = (c*x < -t)" by (subst less_iff_diff_less_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
- also have "\<dots> = (-t/c < x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_less_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t < x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x + t < 0) == (x > (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma pos_prod_sum_lt:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t < 0) == (x < (- 1/c)*t))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c > 0"
- have "c*x + t< 0 = (c*x < -t)" by (subst less_iff_diff_less_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
- also have "\<dots> = (-t/c > x)" by (simp only: pos_less_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t > x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x + t < 0) == (x < (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma sum_lt:"((x::'a::pordered_ab_group_add) + t < 0) == (x < - t)"
- using less_diff_eq[where a= x and b=t and c=0] by simp
-
-lemma neg_prod_le:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x <= 0) == (x >= 0))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c < 0"
- have "c*x <= 0 = (0/c <= x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_le_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = (0 <= x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x <= 0) == (x >= 0)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma pos_prod_le:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x <= 0) == (x <= 0))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c > 0"
- hence "c*x <= 0 = (0/c >= x)" by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = (0 >= x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x <= 0) == (x <= 0)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma neg_prod_sum_le: "(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) < 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t <= 0) == (x >= (- 1/c)*t))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c < 0"
- have "c*x + t <= 0 = (c*x <= -t)" by (subst le_iff_diff_le_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
- also have "\<dots> = (-t/c <= x)" by (simp only: neg_divide_le_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t <= x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x + t <= 0) == (x >= (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma pos_prod_sum_le:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) > 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t <= 0) == (x <= (- 1/c)*t))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c > 0"
- have "c*x + t <= 0 = (c*x <= -t)" by (subst le_iff_diff_le_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
- also have "\<dots> = (-t/c >= x)" by (simp only: pos_le_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- also have "\<dots> = ((- 1/c)*t >= x)" by simp
- finally show "(c*x + t <= 0) == (x <= (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
-qed
-
-lemma sum_le:"((x::'a::pordered_ab_group_add) + t <= 0) == (x <= - t)"
- using le_diff_eq[where a= x and b=t and c=0] by simp
-
-lemma nz_prod_eq:"(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x = 0) == (x = 0))" by simp
-lemma nz_prod_sum_eq: "(c\<Colon>'a\<Colon>ordered_field) \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> ((c*x + t = 0) == (x = (- 1/c)*t))"
-proof-
- assume H: "c \<noteq> 0"
- have "c*x + t = 0 = (c*x = -t)" by (subst eq_iff_diff_eq_0 [of "c*x" "-t"], simp)
- also have "\<dots> = (x = -t/c)" by (simp only: nonzero_eq_divide_eq[OF H] algebra_simps)
- finally show "(c*x + t = 0) == (x = (- 1/c)*t)" by simp
-qed
-lemma sum_eq:"((x::'a::pordered_ab_group_add) + t = 0) == (x = - t)"
- using eq_diff_eq[where a= x and b=t and c=0] by simp
-
-
-interpretation class_ordered_field_dense_linear_order!: constr_dense_linear_order
- "op <=" "op <"
- "\<lambda> x y. 1/2 * ((x::'a::{ordered_field,recpower,number_ring}) + y)"
-proof (unfold_locales, dlo, dlo, auto)
- fix x y::'a assume lt: "x < y"
- from less_half_sum[OF lt] show "x < (x + y) /2" by simp
-next
- fix x y::'a assume lt: "x < y"
- from gt_half_sum[OF lt] show "(x + y) /2 < y" by simp
-qed
-
-declaration{*
-let
-fun earlier [] x y = false
- | earlier (h::t) x y =
- if h aconvc y then false else if h aconvc x then true else earlier t x y;
-
-fun dest_frac ct = case term_of ct of
- Const (@{const_name "HOL.divide"},_) $ a $ b=>
- Rat.rat_of_quotient (snd (HOLogic.dest_number a), snd (HOLogic.dest_number b))
- | t => Rat.rat_of_int (snd (HOLogic.dest_number t))
-
-fun mk_frac phi cT x =
- let val (a, b) = Rat.quotient_of_rat x
- in if b = 1 then Numeral.mk_cnumber cT a
- else Thm.capply
- (Thm.capply (Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME cT] []) @{cpat "op /"})
- (Numeral.mk_cnumber cT a))
- (Numeral.mk_cnumber cT b)
- end
-
-fun whatis x ct = case term_of ct of
- Const(@{const_name "HOL.plus"}, _)$(Const(@{const_name "HOL.times"},_)$_$y)$_ =>
- if y aconv term_of x then ("c*x+t",[(funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg1) ct, Thm.dest_arg ct])
- else ("Nox",[])
-| Const(@{const_name "HOL.plus"}, _)$y$_ =>
- if y aconv term_of x then ("x+t",[Thm.dest_arg ct])
- else ("Nox",[])
-| Const(@{const_name "HOL.times"}, _)$_$y =>
- if y aconv term_of x then ("c*x",[Thm.dest_arg1 ct])
- else ("Nox",[])
-| t => if t aconv term_of x then ("x",[]) else ("Nox",[]);
-
-fun xnormalize_conv ctxt [] ct = reflexive ct
-| xnormalize_conv ctxt (vs as (x::_)) ct =
- case term_of ct of
- Const(@{const_name HOL.less},_)$_$Const(@{const_name "HOL.zero"},_) =>
- (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
- ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
- let
- val cr = dest_frac c
- val clt = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
- val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
- val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
- val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
- (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
- else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
- val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
- val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x,t])
- (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_sum_lt} else @{thm pos_prod_sum_lt})) cth
- val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
- in rth end
- | ("x+t",[t]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_lt"}
- val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
- in rth end
- | ("c*x",[c]) =>
- let
- val cr = dest_frac c
- val clt = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
- val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
- val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
- val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
- (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
- else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
- val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
- val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
- (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_lt} else @{thm pos_prod_lt})) cth
- val rth = th
- in rth end
- | _ => reflexive ct)
-
-
-| Const(@{const_name HOL.less_eq},_)$_$Const(@{const_name "HOL.zero"},_) =>
- (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
- ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val cr = dest_frac c
- val clt = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "op <"}
- val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
- val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
- val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
- (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
- else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
- val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
- val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [c,x,t])
- (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_sum_le} else @{thm pos_prod_sum_le})) cth
- val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
- in rth end
- | ("x+t",[t]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_le"}
- val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
- in rth end
- | ("c*x",[c]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val cr = dest_frac c
- val clt = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "op <"}
- val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
- val neg = cr </ Rat.zero
- val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
- (if neg then Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt c) cz
- else Thm.capply (Thm.capply clt cz) c))
- val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
- val th = implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
- (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_le} else @{thm pos_prod_le})) cth
- val rth = th
- in rth end
- | _ => reflexive ct)
-
-| Const("op =",_)$_$Const(@{const_name "HOL.zero"},_) =>
- (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
- ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val cr = dest_frac c
- val ceq = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
- val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
- val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Not"} (Thm.capply (Thm.capply ceq c) cz)))
- val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
- val th = implies_elim
- (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [c,x,t]) @{thm nz_prod_sum_eq}) cth
- val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
- in rth end
- | ("x+t",[t]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_eq"}
- val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
- in rth end
- | ("c*x",[c]) =>
- let
- val T = ctyp_of_term x
- val cr = dest_frac c
- val ceq = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
- val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
- val cthp = Simplifier.rewrite (local_simpset_of ctxt)
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Trueprop"}
- (Thm.capply @{cterm "Not"} (Thm.capply (Thm.capply ceq c) cz)))
- val cth = equal_elim (symmetric cthp) TrueI
- val rth = implies_elim
- (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [c,x]) @{thm nz_prod_eq}) cth
- in rth end
- | _ => reflexive ct);
-
-local
- val less_iff_diff_less_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "less_iff_diff_less_0"}
- val le_iff_diff_le_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "le_iff_diff_le_0"}
- val eq_iff_diff_eq_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "eq_iff_diff_eq_0"}
-in
-fun field_isolate_conv phi ctxt vs ct = case term_of ct of
- Const(@{const_name HOL.less},_)$a$b =>
- let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
- val T = ctyp_of_term ca
- val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] less_iff_diff_less_0
- val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
- (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv @{context} (earlier vs)))) th
- val rth = transitive nth (xnormalize_conv ctxt vs (Thm.rhs_of nth))
- in rth end
-| Const(@{const_name HOL.less_eq},_)$a$b =>
- let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
- val T = ctyp_of_term ca
- val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] le_iff_diff_le_0
- val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
- (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv @{context} (earlier vs)))) th
- val rth = transitive nth (xnormalize_conv ctxt vs (Thm.rhs_of nth))
- in rth end
-
-| Const("op =",_)$a$b =>
- let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
- val T = ctyp_of_term ca
- val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] eq_iff_diff_eq_0
- val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
- (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
- (Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv @{context} (earlier vs)))) th
- val rth = transitive nth (xnormalize_conv ctxt vs (Thm.rhs_of nth))
- in rth end
-| @{term "Not"} $(Const("op =",_)$a$b) => Conv.arg_conv (field_isolate_conv phi ctxt vs) ct
-| _ => reflexive ct
-end;
-
-fun classfield_whatis phi =
- let
- fun h x t =
- case term_of t of
- Const("op =", _)$y$z => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | @{term "Not"}$(Const("op =", _)$y$z) => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | Const(@{const_name HOL.less},_)$y$z =>
- if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
- else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | Const (@{const_name HOL.less_eq},_)$y$z =>
- if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
- else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
- else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- | _ => Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
- in h end;
-fun class_field_ss phi =
- HOL_basic_ss addsimps ([@{thm "linorder_not_less"}, @{thm "linorder_not_le"}])
- addsplits [@{thm "abs_split"},@{thm "split_max"}, @{thm "split_min"}]
-
-in
-Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.funs @{thm "class_ordered_field_dense_linear_order.ferrack_axiom"}
- {isolate_conv = field_isolate_conv, whatis = classfield_whatis, simpset = class_field_ss}
-end
-*}
-
-
-end
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Library.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Library.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
Continuity
ContNotDenum
Countable
- Dense_Linear_Order
Efficient_Nat
Enum
Eval_Witness
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Quickcheck.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Quickcheck.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
begin
definition
- "random _ = return (TYPE('a), \<lambda>u. Code_Eval.Const (STR ''TYPE'') TYPEREP('a))"
+ "random _ = Pair (TYPE('a), \<lambda>u. Code_Eval.Const (STR ''TYPE'') TYPEREP('a))"
instance ..
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Random.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Random.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -3,33 +3,29 @@
header {* A HOL random engine *}
theory Random
-imports State_Monad Code_Index
+imports Code_Index
begin
+notation fcomp (infixl "o>" 60)
+notation scomp (infixl "o\<rightarrow>" 60)
+
+
subsection {* Auxiliary functions *}
-definition
- inc_shift :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index"
-where
+definition inc_shift :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index" where
"inc_shift v k = (if v = k then 1 else k + 1)"
-definition
- minus_shift :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index"
-where
+definition minus_shift :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index" where
"minus_shift r k l = (if k < l then r + k - l else k - l)"
-fun
- log :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index"
-where
+fun log :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> index" where
"log b i = (if b \<le> 1 \<or> i < b then 1 else 1 + log b (i div b))"
subsection {* Random seeds *}
types seed = "index \<times> index"
-primrec
- "next" :: "seed \<Rightarrow> index \<times> seed"
-where
+primrec "next" :: "seed \<Rightarrow> index \<times> seed" where
"next (v, w) = (let
k = v div 53668;
v' = minus_shift 2147483563 (40014 * (v mod 53668)) (k * 12211);
@@ -40,22 +36,15 @@
lemma next_not_0:
"fst (next s) \<noteq> 0"
-apply (cases s)
-apply (auto simp add: minus_shift_def Let_def)
-done
+ by (cases s) (auto simp add: minus_shift_def Let_def)
-primrec
- seed_invariant :: "seed \<Rightarrow> bool"
-where
+primrec seed_invariant :: "seed \<Rightarrow> bool" where
"seed_invariant (v, w) \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < v \<and> v < 9438322952 \<and> 0 < w \<and> True"
-lemma if_same:
- "(if b then f x else f y) = f (if b then x else y)"
+lemma if_same: "(if b then f x else f y) = f (if b then x else y)"
by (cases b) simp_all
-definition
- split_seed :: "seed \<Rightarrow> seed \<times> seed"
-where
+definition split_seed :: "seed \<Rightarrow> seed \<times> seed" where
"split_seed s = (let
(v, w) = s;
(v', w') = snd (next s);
@@ -68,9 +57,7 @@
subsection {* Base selectors *}
-function
- range_aux :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> index \<times> seed"
-where
+function range_aux :: "index \<Rightarrow> index \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> index \<times> seed" where
"range_aux k l s = (if k = 0 then (l, s) else
let (v, s') = next s
in range_aux (k - 1) (v + l * 2147483561) s')"
@@ -79,13 +66,9 @@
by (relation "measure (Code_Index.nat_of o fst)")
(auto simp add: index)
-definition
- range :: "index \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> index \<times> seed"
-where
- "range k = (do
- v \<leftarrow> range_aux (log 2147483561 k) 1;
- return (v mod k)
- done)"
+definition range :: "index \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> index \<times> seed" where
+ "range k = range_aux (log 2147483561 k) 1
+ o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>v. Pair (v mod k))"
lemma range:
assumes "k > 0"
@@ -95,17 +78,13 @@
"range_aux (log 2147483561 k) 1 s = (v, w)"
by (cases "range_aux (log 2147483561 k) 1 s")
with assms show ?thesis
- by (simp add: monad_collapse range_def del: range_aux.simps log.simps)
+ by (simp add: scomp_apply range_def del: range_aux.simps log.simps)
qed
-definition
- select :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> seed"
-where
- "select xs = (do
- k \<leftarrow> range (Code_Index.of_nat (length xs));
- return (nth xs (Code_Index.nat_of k))
- done)"
-
+definition select :: "'a list \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> seed" where
+ "select xs = range (Code_Index.of_nat (length xs))
+ o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>k. Pair (nth xs (Code_Index.nat_of k)))"
+
lemma select:
assumes "xs \<noteq> []"
shows "fst (select xs s) \<in> set xs"
@@ -116,34 +95,29 @@
then have
"Code_Index.nat_of (fst (range (Code_Index.of_nat (length xs)) s)) < length xs" by simp
then show ?thesis
- by (auto simp add: monad_collapse select_def)
+ by (simp add: scomp_apply split_beta select_def)
qed
-definition
- select_default :: "index \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> seed"
-where
- [code del]: "select_default k x y = (do
- l \<leftarrow> range k;
- return (if l + 1 < k then x else y)
- done)"
+definition select_default :: "index \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> seed \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> seed" where
+ [code del]: "select_default k x y = range k
+ o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>l. Pair (if l + 1 < k then x else y))"
lemma select_default_zero:
"fst (select_default 0 x y s) = y"
- by (simp add: monad_collapse select_default_def)
+ by (simp add: scomp_apply split_beta select_default_def)
lemma select_default_code [code]:
- "select_default k x y = (if k = 0 then do
- _ \<leftarrow> range 1;
- return y
- done else do
- l \<leftarrow> range k;
- return (if l + 1 < k then x else y)
- done)"
-proof (cases "k = 0")
- case False then show ?thesis by (simp add: select_default_def)
-next
- case True then show ?thesis
- by (simp add: monad_collapse select_default_def range_def)
+ "select_default k x y = (if k = 0
+ then range 1 o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>_. Pair y)
+ else range k o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>l. Pair (if l + 1 < k then x else y)))"
+proof
+ fix s
+ have "snd (range (Code_Index.of_nat 0) s) = snd (range (Code_Index.of_nat 1) s)"
+ by (simp add: range_def scomp_Pair scomp_apply split_beta)
+ then show "select_default k x y s = (if k = 0
+ then range 1 o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>_. Pair y)
+ else range k o\<rightarrow> (\<lambda>l. Pair (if l + 1 < k then x else y))) s"
+ by (cases "k = 0") (simp_all add: select_default_def scomp_apply split_beta)
qed
@@ -177,5 +151,8 @@
end;
*}
+no_notation fcomp (infixl "o>" 60)
+no_notation scomp (infixl "o\<rightarrow>" 60)
+
end
--- a/src/HOL/List.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/List.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
set :: "'a list => 'a set"
map :: "('a=>'b) => ('a list => 'b list)"
listsum :: "'a list => 'a::monoid_add"
- nth :: "'a list => nat => 'a" (infixl "!" 100)
list_update :: "'a list => nat => 'a => 'a list"
take:: "nat => 'a list => 'a list"
drop:: "nat => 'a list => 'a list"
@@ -146,8 +145,8 @@
-- {*Warning: simpset does not contain this definition, but separate
theorems for @{text "n = 0"} and @{text "n = Suc k"} *}
-primrec
- nth_Cons:"(x#xs)!n = (case n of 0 => x | (Suc k) => xs!k)"
+primrec nth :: "'a list => nat => 'a" (infixl "!" 100) where
+ nth_Cons: "(x#xs)!n = (case n of 0 => x | (Suc k) => xs!k)"
-- {*Warning: simpset does not contain this definition, but separate
theorems for @{text "n = 0"} and @{text "n = Suc k"} *}
--- a/src/HOL/MetisExamples/BigO.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/MetisExamples/BigO.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
header {* Big O notation *}
theory BigO
-imports Dense_Linear_Order Main SetsAndFunctions
+imports "~~/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order" Main SetsAndFunctions
begin
subsection {* Definitions *}
--- a/src/HOL/Orderings.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Orderings.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -1033,7 +1033,6 @@
assumes gt_ex: "\<exists>y. x < y"
and lt_ex: "\<exists>y. y < x"
and dense: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>z. x < z \<and> z < y)"
- (*see further theory Dense_Linear_Order*)
subsection {* Wellorders *}
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/generated_cooper.ML Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/generated_cooper.ML Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
(* Title: HOL/Tools/Qelim/generated_cooper.ML
-This file is generated from HOL/Reflection/Cooper.thy. DO NOT EDIT.
+This file is generated from HOL/Decision_Procs/Cooper.thy. DO NOT EDIT.
*)
structure GeneratedCooper =
--- a/src/HOL/ex/Dense_Linear_Order_Ex.thy Fri Feb 06 14:36:58 2009 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/ex/Dense_Linear_Order_Ex.thy Fri Feb 06 15:15:46 2009 +0100
@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
-(*
- ID: $Id$
- Author: Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
-*)
+(* Author: Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen *)
header {* Examples for Ferrante and Rackoff's quantifier elimination procedure *}
theory Dense_Linear_Order_Ex
-imports Dense_Linear_Order Main
+imports "~~/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order" Main
begin
lemma